Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

The Origins of the Rapture

26:36UrduBy ReligionForBreakfastTranscribed May 11, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
0:00

in the blink of an eye Millions

0:02

disappear and the world is thrown into

0:04

chaos cars crash planes fall out of the

0:08

sky and there are piles of clothes

0:10

everywhere that's the upshot of the 2014

0:12

movie Left Behind starring The One and

0:15

Only Nick cage cage is an airline pilot

0:18

whose co-pilot and many passengers

0:20

simply vanish in fact Millions have

0:23

vanished across the world those who

0:25

disappeared were Christians taken to

0:27

heaven and the unbelievers were well

0:29

Left Behind the Left Behind movie was

0:32

based on a best-selling series of books

0:34

that outline a scenario in which true

0:36

Christians are snatched up to heaven

0:38

right before the appearance of the

0:39

Antichrist this climactic moment is

0:42

called The Rapture the sudden physical

0:45

removal of all living Christians from

0:46

the world into God's presence while the

0:49

Left Behind franchise is probably the

0:50

most famous example within the prophecy

0:52

fiction genre for many American

0:54

Evangelical Christians the core idea of

0:57

the Rapture is not fiction at all they

0:59

believe that the Rapture will actually

1:00

happen Rapture theology as interpreted

1:03

by many American Evangelical Christians

1:05

has several principles first of course

1:07

the Rapture the sudden disappearance of

1:09

Christians at any moment but

1:11

specifically a pre-tribulation Rapture

1:13

meaning that this sudden removal of

1:15

Christians occurs before a time of

1:17

global hardship and suffering called the

1:19

tribulation during this period a human

1:21

foe called the Antichrist will rise to

1:23

power finally at the end of the

1:25

tribulation the second coming occurs

1:27

Jesus Christ will return resurrect all

1:29

believers and dispense Justice to the

1:31

Sinners he will defeat the Antichrist

1:33

imprison the devil and establish an

1:35

Earthly Kingdom that will last a

1:37

thousand years the so-called Millennial

1:40

Kingdom after the 1000 Years there will

1:42

be a final confrontation with Satan

1:44

before he's defeated and thrown into the

1:46

Lake of Fire for good Scholars call this

1:49

theology dispensational

1:50

pre-millennialism it's probably the most

1:52

common form of rapture theology among

1:54

American evangelicals but there are

1:56

other versions that we won't get into

1:57

pre-millennial refers to the belief that

1:59

Jesus Will effectively return twice once

2:01

before his Millennial Kingdom in the

2:03

Rapture and then again after the

2:05

tribulation to establish his kingdom and

2:07

dispensational refers to the idea that

2:09

God's relationship with Humanity has

2:11

undergone distinct phases or

2:12

dispensations throughout history each

2:15

dispensation is a unique stage in which

2:17

God relates to humanity in a certain way

2:19

for many dispensationalists history is

2:21

partitioned into seven dispensations and

2:23

we are living in the second to last one

2:25

on the cusp of the end of the world

2:27

while virtually all Christians believe

2:29

in the second coming of Christ most do

2:31

not adhere to this view of the end times

2:33

belief in the Rapture is not promoted

2:36

among Catholics the different branches

2:37

of Orthodox Christianity or the majority

2:39

of protestant Christians however it is

2:42

popular among American evangelicals as

2:44

one of the largest religious groups in

2:46

the United States American

2:47

evangelicalism has a high visibility in

2:49

the country both culturally and

2:51

politically so the support of rapture

2:53

Theology and the huge popularity of

2:56

Prophecy fiction like the Left Behind

2:57

series gives the impression that this

2:59

view of the end times is more widely

3:01

accepted than it really is but it has

3:04

been hugely influential one historian

3:06

describes dispensationalism as perhaps

3:08

the most resilient popular theological

3:11

movement in American history

3:13

dispensationalist beliefs such as the

3:15

Rapture have even influenced U.S foreign

3:17

policy as former Secretary of State Mike

3:19

Pompeo is a dispensationalist

3:21

Evangelical and has spoken openly about

3:23

his belief in the Rapture so where did

3:26

this idea of a pre-tribulation Rapture

3:28

come from proponents of rapture theology

3:30

look especially to one particular Bible

3:32

passage composed by the Apostle Paul

3:34

which they argue refers to a

3:36

rapture-like event first Thessalonians

3:38

chapter 4 verses 16 and 17. it's worth

3:41

quoting the whole thing for the Lord

3:43

himself with a cry of command with the

3:45

archangel's call and with the sound of

3:47

God's trumpet will descend from heaven

3:49

and the dead in Christ will rise first

3:51

then we who are alive who are left will

3:54

be caught up in the clouds together with

3:56

them to meet the Lord in the air and so

3:58

we will be with the Lord forever so what

4:00

does this mean first of all I need to

4:02

stress Scholars are not 100 sure it's

4:05

famously one of the most confusing

4:07

passages in the entire New Testament as

4:10

the scholars candida moss and Joel Baden

4:12

say desp despite the many many studies

4:15

on this passage the cultural and

4:17

intellectual context of being quote

4:19

caught up in the clouds together with

4:21

the Lord and the air has remained

4:23

obscure has remained obscure is an

4:25

academic way of saying we just don't

4:27

know what Paul means here but let's try

4:29

our best this verse comes from a letter

4:31

that Paul wrote to a church that was

4:33

worried that the return of Christ had

4:35

not happened yet especially because some

4:37

members of the congregation had already

4:39

died without experiencing the second

4:40

coming that's not supposed to happen

4:42

they're supposed to witness the

4:44

inauguration of a new kingdom not simply

4:46

die so Paul is offering an

4:48

interpretation of what will happen to

4:50

those that had already died and ends the

4:52

passage with therefore encourage one

4:54

another with these words he was trying

4:56

to comfort a bunch of Christians who

4:58

thought the return of Christ should have

4:59

happened by now the dead in Christ will

5:01

resurrect don't worry the New Testament

5:03

scholar helmet Kester argued that

5:05

ancient Imperial military imagery is

5:07

bubbling under the surface of this

5:09

passage the text says the Lord himself

5:11

with a cry of command and with the

5:14

Angel's call and what the sound of God's

5:16

trumpet will descend from heaven this

5:18

description can be seen as echoing the

5:19

imagery of an emperor visiting a colony

5:21

or Province who would be escorted by

5:23

trumpets and other symbols of authority

5:25

when Paul says they will meet the Lord

5:27

in the air that word is translating the

5:29

Greek word apontesis which is a

5:31

technical term for the act of going out

5:33

to meet a dignitary or Monarch from

5:35

another city so according to kester's

5:37

interpretation which is shared by other

5:39

Scholars such as Bart Ehrman the people

5:41

meeting Christ and the clouds are

5:43

basically an imperial delegation of

5:44

emissaries going out to meet the emperor

5:46

Kester argues that there's no sense at

5:49

all that they will stay up there in the

5:50

clouds but rather will promptly return

5:52

to Earth escorting Jesus to establish

5:54

his new kingdom just as a delegation of

5:56

emissaries would escort the emperor into

5:58

the city Kester concludes that it is not

6:01

possible to understand this passage as a

6:03

statement about the Rapture of the

6:05

Believers into heaven in their study on

6:07

this passage Dr Moss and Dr Baden offer

6:09

another complementary interpretation

6:11

arguing that Paul may have been

6:13

influenced by ancient Jewish ideas that

6:15

God's chosen people will literally gain

6:18

the ability to fly at the end of days

6:20

the key text here is Isaiah chapter 60

6:22

verse 8. who are those who fly like a

6:25

cloud like doves to their coats although

6:28

this is a reference to the white sails

6:29

of a ship bringing the Israelites back

6:31

from diaspora later Jewish theologians

6:34

interpreted this text apocalyptically

6:36

those that fly like a cloud are

6:38

literally people who will fly at the end

6:40

of the world for example a passage in

6:43

the rabbinic text called the talmud says

6:45

in the future the Holy One will lift

6:46

Jerusalem three parasangs High unless

6:49

you think it is painful to go up to it

6:51

scripture teaches who are those who fly

6:53

like a cloud like doves to their coats

6:56

so according to this the end of days

6:58

Jerusalem will be a floating city but

7:00

fortunately you can reach it because you

7:02

will fly this idea is repeated in

7:04

multiple rabbinic texts not just the

7:06

talmud it's worth mentioning that these

7:08

texts are much later than the letters of

7:10

Paul but moss and Baden theorize that

7:12

the ideas found in these texts might

7:14

stretch back to the lifetime of Paul and

7:17

that these people being taken up in

7:18

first Thessalonians 4 may be viewed as

7:21

traveling via Cloud to reach the end of

7:23

days Jerusalem floating in the sky

7:25

do they stay up there well Scholars

7:28

don't know the phrase so will be with

7:30

the Lord forever might imply that they

7:32

remain up there in the clouds though as

7:34

we saw with Scholars like Dr Kester

7:35

others argued that Paul would have

7:37

likely assumed that these people then

7:39

returned to Earth regardless this

7:40

passage is not describing a Rapture Paul

7:43

is describing the resurrection event at

7:44

the end of days the same event he

7:46

describes elsewhere like in First

7:48

Corinthians 15 when he says that our

7:49

bodies will be transformed into Immortal

7:52

bodies in an instant but now he's

7:54

describing it with a colorful metaphor

7:56

of escorting Jesus like an emperor into

7:58

the city the notion of being Zapped away

8:00

like in the Left Behind movies would

8:01

have been Unthinkable to Paul proponents

8:04

of rapture theology have interpreted

8:06

this passage alongside other apocalyptic

8:08

passages in the gospels Matthew 24 says

8:10

then two will be in the field one will

8:13

be taken and one will be left two women

8:15

will be grinding meal together one will

8:17

be taken and one will be left keep awake

8:20

therefore for you do not know what day

8:22

your lord is coming these verses are the

8:24

partial inspiration for how the Rapture

8:26

has been depicted in film sudden

8:28

disappearance but in this verse it's a

8:31

bit vague as to who's being taken and

8:33

who is being left are the Believers

8:35

taken or the unbelievers the verse is

8:37

not entirely clear a parallel passage in

8:40

Luke 17 is more explicit on that day no

8:43

one who is on the roof of his house with

8:45

his Goods inside should go down to get

8:47

them likewise no one in the field should

8:49

go back for anything remember Lot's wife

8:52

which is a reference to the woman in

8:53

Genesis who looked back at the burning

8:55

city of Sodom while escaping turning her

8:57

into a pillar of salt because proponents

8:59

of rapture theology read these passages

9:01

alongside first Thessalonians they

9:03

assume that the one being snatched away

9:05

in Matthew and Luke is the lucky one the

9:07

one escaping Calamity but in these texts

9:10

the metaphor is surviving a Calamity in

9:13

Matthew 24 the disaster is specifically

9:15

a flood so the one being snatched away

9:17

is The Unlucky One Swept Away by the

9:19

flood the person who pauses to try to

9:21

save their belongings are the ones Swept

9:23

Away to judgment while those who are

9:25

Left Behind are the ones to be saved

9:28

without the context of first

9:29

Thessalonians no one would assume a

9:32

Rapture is being described in these

9:33

passages although the New Testament does

9:35

speak of a second coming of Christ these

9:37

and other verses taken by themselves do

9:39

not point to the end time scenario of

9:41

the sudden disappearance of Christians

9:43

these ideas developed over time and like

9:45

the belief in the Antichrist are a

9:47

Pastiche of ideas drawn from multiple

9:49

different biblical passages passages

9:51

that were not originally intended to be

9:53

interpreted side by side so if it's not

9:55

in the Bible where did the idea of a

9:57

pre-tribulation Rapture come from if

9:59

you've looked into the subject before

10:00

you may have heard that the Rapture was

10:01

invented in the 1800s by a man named

10:04

John Nelson Darby and as we'll see in

10:06

the next section that's definitely when

10:08

the precise Contours of

10:09

dispensationalist theology were first

10:11

developed systematized and popularized

10:14

but there are some possible hints that

10:16

Christians starting in the late antique

10:18

period believed in a pre-tribulation

10:20

rapture-like event even if that event

10:23

does not resemble the dispensationalist

10:25

version of the Rapture scene today now

10:27

I'm using the qualifier possible hints

10:30

because the evidence we're dealing with

10:32

are not well-developed theological

10:34

treatises the evidence I'm about to show

10:36

you are passing references in a small

10:38

handful of Fringe ancient and medieval

10:40

texts moreover these passages have been

10:43

analyzed almost exclusively by Pro

10:45

Rapture Evangelical theologians people

10:48

who may be motivated to prove that this

10:49

idea was taught by the early church more

10:52

research is needed in this field

10:53

conducted by more critical Scholars but

10:56

I'm sharing these passages as potential

10:58

evidence that problematizes the idea

10:59

that a pre-tribulation Rapture was

11:01

invented in the 1800s first let's

11:03

consider a document called The

11:05

Apocalypse of Elijah a text that was

11:07

circulated among Egyptian Christians

11:08

around the 3rd Century CE the document

11:10

outlines a scenario in which an

11:12

antichrist-like figure called the

11:14

Lawless one is persecuting Christians

11:15

when God sends an army of angels to

11:17

rescue them

11:19

on that day the Christ will pity those

11:21

who are his own and he will send from

11:23

Heaven his 64 000 Angels now those upon

11:27

whose forehead the name of Christ is

11:28

written and upon whose hand is the seal

11:31

both the small and the great will be

11:33

taken up upon their wings and lifted up

11:35

before his wrath archangels then lead

11:37

the rescued Believers into a liminal

11:39

Place simply called The Holy Land it's

11:42

unclear if the author specifically means

11:44

the land of Israel but it's a logical

11:46

conclusion the text draws imagery from

11:48

the book of Exodus in which the

11:49

Israelites follow a pillar of fire but

11:52

in this case the archangels Gabriel and

11:54

Uriel make a pillar of light once they

11:56

arrive in the Holy Land the text says

11:58

they will neither hunger nor thirst nor

12:00

will the Lawless one have power over

12:02

them the next chapter describes the

12:04

decline of the Earth the trees are

12:06

uprooted wild beasts and farm animals

12:09

will die in catastrophe birds will fall

12:11

on the ground so here we see a possible

12:14

early example of Jesus rescuing

12:16

Christians from experiencing the

12:18

destruction of the Earth but it's

12:20

nothing like the Left Behind Rapture

12:21

mainly there's no indication that

12:23

they're transported to heaven but rather

12:25

remain on Earth in a safe place the Holy

12:27

Land another example comes from a sermon

12:29

probably composed in the 7th or 8th

12:31

centuries called The Apocalypse of

12:33

pseudoefram pseudoephram because it

12:35

seems to have been forged in the name of

12:37

the Syrian Church Father Ephraim the

12:39

text describes a tribulation at the end

12:41

of the world you know the drill Wars

12:43

disasters diseases then the Antichrist

12:45

arises and rules of the world from

12:47

Jerusalem in this text is a passage that

12:50

appears to some Modern Evangelical

12:52

theologians as a rapture-like event for

12:54

all the saints and elect of God are

12:56

gathered prior to the tribulation that

12:58

is to come and are taken to the Lord

13:00

lest they see the confusion that is to

13:02

overwhelm the world because of our sins

13:04

this seems pretty straightforward but

13:06

it's more complicated than that Scholars

13:08

have described the end times theology

13:09

found in this text as confused

13:11

contradictory and muddled for example in

13:14

the very next section it says that

13:16

during this terrible time neither

13:18

Christian nor heretic neither June or

13:20

Pagan will have time to bury their dead

13:22

a few sections later the text says that

13:24

the tribulation will overwhelm all

13:26

people just an unjust which suggests

13:29

that the author assumes that Christians

13:31

are still there on Earth to experience

13:33

the tribulation they're not all gone The

13:36

Scholar David Malcolm Bennett one of the

13:37

few researchers to study this text says

13:40

that these pre-tribulation theologians

13:42

are imposing their own theology on the

13:44

text since pseudoefram seems to assume

13:46

that Christians are still on Earth

13:47

during the tribulation Bennett concludes

13:49

what is probably intended by those

13:51

comments is that the Saints will be

13:53

protected by God within the tribulation

13:55

rather than removed from it left

13:57

behind's rigid literal interpretation is

14:00

clearly alien to the thought of Ephraim

14:02

whose method was much Freer and more

14:04

imaginative

14:05

fast forward to the turn of the 14th

14:07

century a document dating to around 1307

14:10

called the history of brother dulcino

14:12

mentions a rapture-like teaching among a

14:14

renegade monastic order called the

14:16

apostolic Brethren led by a friar simply

14:19

known as dulcino this group was

14:21

violently persecuted by the Catholic

14:23

church and his leaders were burned at

14:24

the stake the text says that the members

14:26

of the apostolic Brethren will be caught

14:28

up into heaven three and a half years

14:29

into the reign of the Antichrist and in

14:32

this way they will be preserved unharmed

14:34

from the persecution of antichrist after

14:36

the death of the Antichrist brother

14:38

dulcino himself would return to Earth as

14:40

pope now it's worth mentioning that this

14:42

text was composed by an opponent of the

14:44

apostolic Brethren so we should be

14:46

skeptical that the text accurately

14:47

reports their theology but whether or

14:49

not dulcino held to this belief some

14:52

pro-rapture theologians in recent years

14:54

have held this up as an example that the

14:56

idea of a pre-tribulation Rapture was

14:58

held by at least some Christians before

15:00

the 1800s though with some important

15:03

changes notice that the text says

15:05

dulcino and his followers would be

15:06

transferred into Paradise not the whole

15:08

of Christianity only dulcino's followers

15:11

and there's little to indicate that

15:13

Jesus Christ is doing the Rapture and

15:14

returning here it's brother dulcino who

15:17

returns to earth judging from texts like

15:19

The Apocalypse of pseudoefram the idea

15:21

that God will rescue some or all

15:23

Christians and spare them from the

15:25

tribulation may have been held by some

15:27

Christians but these texts do not mirror

15:30

what we see in modern Rapture theology

15:32

two of our three examples seem to

15:34

suggest that Christians remain on Earth

15:36

during the tribulation and the third

15:38

example only describes a small group of

15:41

one man's disciples so how do we get to

15:43

the left behind style of the Rapture the

15:46

complete sudden removal of Christians

15:48

from Earth for that we need to turn to

15:50

this guy the Englishman John Nelson

15:53

Darby known as the father of

15:55

dispensationalism Darby was an

15:58

influential preacher Theologian and

16:00

Bible translator Who Rose to prominence

16:02

in the 1830s originally in Anglican

16:04

priest in Ireland he eventually grew

16:06

disillusioned with the church and

16:08

resigned his position in the 1820s and

16:10

30s he became associated with a

16:12

Christian Movement called the Plymouth

16:13

Brethren named for the fact that one of

16:15

their largest congregations was based in

16:17

the port city of Plymouth and Southwest

16:19

England

16:20

the Plymouth Brethren were a group of

16:22

anti-establishment Christians who

16:24

rejected professional clergy were very

16:26

critical of established churches like

16:28

the Church of England and claimed to

16:30

read the Bible literally now to say that

16:32

Darby invented dispensationalism in

16:35

general and the Rapture specifically is

16:37

probably an overstatement the concept of

16:39

dispensations predates Darby and at the

16:42

time pre-millennialism was already an

16:43

idea held by some Anglican Christians in

16:46

English and Irish intellectual circles

16:48

though more on the margins of those

16:50

intellectual circles moreover a Baptist

16:52

Theologian named Morgan Edwards who was

16:54

active decades before Darby throughout

16:56

the 1700s seems to have taught a version

16:59

of The Rapture that also placed it

17:00

before the tribulation so while Darby

17:02

was not inventing ideas out of whole

17:04

cloth we can definitely say that he

17:06

systematized and popularized the idea of

17:08

the Rapture within his complex

17:10

theological system that went on to get

17:12

very popular and we can trace a direct

17:14

line of influence from Darby To the Left

17:16

Behind series here in the 21st century

17:18

Darby argued that history tree is

17:21

divided into dispensations which we

17:23

defined at the start of this video as

17:24

discrete ages during which God relates

17:26

to humanity in different ways later

17:28

popular formulations divide history into

17:31

seven dispensations the first begins

17:33

with creation and ends when Adam and Eve

17:35

sin against God the next one is the

17:37

anti-diluvian dispensation or the time

17:39

before the flood which goes from Adam to

17:41

Noah and ends with the great flood

17:43

described in the Book of Genesis the

17:45

second to last is the age of the church

17:47

and the final is the millennial Kingdom

17:48

now Darby's exact divisions are not

17:50

quite so clear-cut he seems to have

17:53

divided history like this on screen

17:54

starting with Noah and ending with the

17:56

final dispensation that begins with the

17:58

Rapture Darby argued that these

18:00

dispensations were a boom and bust cycle

18:02

always ending in tragedy always with

18:05

humans failing the fall of humanity into

18:07

sin Noah's flood the Babylonian exile

18:10

disaster after disaster after disaster

18:13

like later formulations Darby believed

18:16

that we are living in the second to last

18:18

dispensation the age of the church but

18:21

even this dispensation is headed for

18:22

ruin like other Plymouth Brethren he

18:24

thought that most established churches

18:26

in this era have fallen into apostasy he

18:29

believed that only a small remnant of

18:31

Christians were truly destined to be

18:33

saved Darby taught that the church

18:34

dispensation would end with the Rapture

18:36

a two-stage return of Jesus first Jesus

18:39

would appear in the clouds and

18:41

Christians would rise to him as

18:42

described in first Thessalonians chapter

18:44

4 then seven years of tribulation then

18:47

Jesus would return physically to Earth

18:49

after the tribulation establishing his

18:51

1000 year Rule and commencing the final

18:53

dispensation as we said these ideas were

18:56

not 100 novel The historian Daniel

18:58

Hummel who wrote the most recent and

19:01

comprehensive history of

19:02

dispensationalism says that Darby was

19:04

not making entirely novel contributions

19:07

on any of these points but he was

19:09

shaping a new type of Christian identity

19:12

that bundled a condemnation of

19:14

established churches a pre-millennial

19:16

eschatology and a dualism Between Heaven

19:19

and Earth so how did Darby's theology

19:22

get so popular well the Plymouth

19:24

Brethren went abroad throughout the

19:26

mid-1800s Plymouth Brethren preachers

19:27

started to bring their ideas to North

19:29

America where they found a bunch of

19:31

people already obsessed with predicting

19:32

when the second coming of Jesus would

19:34

occur William Miller whose followers

19:36

would later form the Seventh-day

19:38

Adventist denomination taught that the

19:40

second coming of Christ would occur in

19:41

1843 or 1844 when this prediction failed

19:45

others stepped in with their own

19:46

predictions so the Plymouth Brethren

19:48

found a very receptive audience in the

19:50

U.S Darby himself also traveled to North

19:52

America visiting seven times between

19:54

1862 and 1877. he spent most of his time

19:58

in the American Midwest and New England

19:59

between several major cities and urban

20:01

evangelicals started to adopt his ideas

20:04

most importantly a man named Dwight L

20:07

moody moody was a Revival Preacher based

20:10

in Chicago at the time though he had

20:11

some disagreements with Darby he started

20:13

teaching pre-millennial ideas in his

20:15

sermons spreading far and wide the idea

20:17

that a pre-tribulation Rapture was about

20:19

to happen any day Moody thought he was

20:22

living in the final days he wrote I look

20:24

on this world as a wrecked vessel God

20:27

has given me a Lifeboat and said to me

20:29

Moody save all you can but Rapture

20:32

theology really exploded in the U.S

20:34

thanks to this guy Cyrus Schofield he

20:38

was a confederate soldier turned Union

20:39

sympathizer turned politician and lawyer

20:42

who converted to Evangelical

20:43

Christianity in the late 1880s launching

20:46

a second career as a theologian and

20:48

preacher he was part of the whole to

20:50

White L Moody movement and he started

20:52

preaching within the local Moody network

20:53

of congregations where he adopted

20:55

dispensationalist ideas he went on to

20:58

publish the Scofield reference Bible in

21:00

1909 a King James version of the Bible

21:02

with commentary explaining the text from

21:05

a dispensational pre-millennial

21:06

perspective so for example right here at

21:08

the beginning in the Book of Genesis the

21:10

Scofield bible has a subheading above

21:12

Genesis chapter 1 verse 28 calling it

21:14

the first dispensation below the text in

21:17

the footnotes it provides a helpful

21:19

definition of what that is and in a note

21:21

under the all-important passage first

21:23

Thessalonians chapter 4 verse 16 the

21:26

Scofield bible takes the two-stage

21:28

Resurrection narrative for granted

21:29

explicitly saying that the passage

21:31

describes the first resurrection so by

21:33

using footnotes and subheadings the

21:35

Scofield reference Bible basically

21:37

builds a pre-millennial

21:38

dispensationalist framework around the

21:41

entire Bible and as a study Bible it

21:43

presents itself as a scholarly Authority

21:45

using scholarly academic language to

21:47

disregard competing interpretations

21:49

especially rejecting critical biblical

21:51

scholarship and darwinian evolution

21:53

which made it a very popular bible

21:55

within fundamentalist circles and it was

21:58

very popular it sold one million copies

22:01

within a decade and exceeded 2 million

22:03

copies by the end of World War II the

22:05

Scofield bible thus spread

22:06

dispensationalist ideas like the Rapture

22:08

to millions and millions of conservative

22:10

Evangelical Christians effectively

22:13

solidifying dispensationalism as a part

22:15

of American Evangelical culture for the

22:17

rest of the 20th century so by the mid

22:19

20th century capture and other

22:21

dispensationalist beliefs had become a

22:23

staple of end times thinking among

22:25

conservative American Evangelical

22:27

Christians and it reached new heights of

22:29

popularity during the Cold War when many

22:31

began to look for a religious

22:33

explanation for current events like the

22:35

rise of the Soviet Union and the

22:36

establishment of the modern state of

22:38

Israel a new generation of Evangelical

22:40

authors started to interpret geopolitics

22:42

through the lens of dispensationalist

22:44

thinking most importantly Hal Lindsey

22:46

I'm speaking to you today from the last

22:49

Battlefield on planet Earth

22:51

Hal Lindsay was an author who sparked a

22:53

cottage industry interpreting current

22:55

events as fulfilling biblical prophecy

22:57

many people think that because this

22:59

man's called the Antichrist that he'll

23:01

appear to be evil but Satan's no fool a

23:04

graduate from Dallas Theological

23:05

Seminary he published a book in 1970

23:08

called the late great planet Earth it

23:10

was basically an explainer of

23:12

pre-millennial dispensationalism

23:13

packaged for a popular audience blending

23:16

prophecy spirituality and geopolitics

23:19

and it was a mega bestseller it became

23:22

the best-selling non-fiction book of the

23:24

1970s with 10 million copies sold in the

23:26

1970s and 28 million sold by the year

23:29

2000. the historian Daniel Hummel says

23:31

that the book entered the bloodstream of

23:34

American culture making the word rapture

23:36

a household term the book also

23:38

kick-started Decades of people

23:40

monetizing dispensationalist Theology

23:42

and Rapture predictions in books radio

23:45

shows movies and later on social media

23:47

notably one of these authors was Tim

23:49

lahaye the Baptist Minister who would go

23:52

on to co-write the Left Behind series in

23:53

the 1990s but he got his start in the

23:56

1970s soon after Lindsay published his

23:58

book though lahaye's first book was

24:00

nowhere near as popular as the Left

24:01

Behind series which sold 80 million

24:04

copies perhaps no other work is more

24:06

responsible for belief in the Rapture in

24:08

other words the idea was spread not by

24:10

theologians but by popular media and

24:13

here we see an interesting phenomenon

24:14

here in the 21st century tension between

24:16

the Evangelical Intelligentsia and

24:19

popular Evangelical belief Dr Hummel

24:21

argues that we're witnessing a collapse

24:24

in dispensationalist theology here in

24:26

the 2020s in the early 2000s

24:28

conservative American evangelicalism

24:30

swung toward what some have called new

24:32

Calvinism led by figures like the

24:34

Baptist Theologian John Piper Piper

24:37

explicitly rejected the concept of a

24:39

pre-tribulation Rapture as did NT write

24:41

an Anglican Theologian and Scholar who

24:43

became very popular among certain

24:45

segments of American evangelicalism

24:47

Wright explicitly attacked Rapture

24:49

theology in his 2008 book surprised by

24:51

hope Evangelical universities founded by

24:53

dispensationalists such as Biola college

24:55

and Gordon College ditched the theology

24:57

as well as did some Evangelical

24:59

denominations in 2019 the Evangelical

25:02

Free Church of America removed

25:04

pre-millennial theology from its

25:05

statement of faith so while Rapture

25:07

theology remains very popular today it

25:09

draws most of its inspiration from pop

25:11

dispensational writings like the Left

25:13

Behind series some historians go so far

25:15

as to call it a form of folk

25:17

evangelicalism as the theological muscle

25:19

backing the belief has diminished as

25:21

Evangelical theologians and institutions

25:23

have turned away from it all this to say

25:25

belief in the Rapture started on The

25:27

Fringe of Evangelical theology but it

25:29

may be headed to The Fringe once again

25:31

as we talked about in this video Rapture

25:33

theology draws a lot of inspiration from

25:35

first Thessalonians a text composed for

25:37

a congregation that was very concerned

25:39

that Jesus had not returned yet as the

25:41

decades and centuries went on Christians

25:43

started to Grapple with this delayed

25:45

return in writing developing new

25:47

theological Frameworks to make sense of

25:49

it one of these texts is the Gospel of

25:51

Thomas which has passages that describe

25:53

the coming of the kingdom of God as an

25:55

internal event rather than an external

25:57

political event I'll be teaching an

25:59

online webinar about the Gospel of

26:00

Thomas on Monday July 31st starting at 6

26:03

30 PM U.S east Coast time tickets cost

26:06

whatever you want I don't want cost to

26:07

get in the way think of this webinar

26:09

like a guided close reading of a very

26:11

complicated text I'll walk us through

26:13

the major themes in the Gospel of Thomas

26:15

some key passages and the scholarship on

26:17

what the text actually means if you

26:19

can't make it during that exact time

26:20

slot don't worry afterward I'll send out

26:22

a recording of the webinar to everyone

26:23

who signed up just head on over to

26:25

religion for breakfast.eventbrite.com to

26:28

join so again that's religion for

26:30

breakfast.eventbrite.com thanks everyone

26:32

hope to see you there

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.