Do Jesus' Last Words Refute Catholicism?
[Music]
hey everyone welcome to the Council of
trend podcast I'm your host Kelly
dancers apologist and speaker Trent horn
and today we're going to talk about a
Biblical urban legend related to the
last words that Jesus said on the cross
before he died which I think is
appropriate for us to discuss because
Good Friday will be here before we know
it so I think it's helpful to engage
some of the arguments related to this
particular passage from scripture but
before we do that if you could help me
out by liking this video and subscribing
I would greatly appreciate it so all
right let's take a look at the passage
in question John 19 30 records the last
words Jesus Christ spoke on the cross at
least according to the Gospel of John as
it is finished which in Greek is one
word to tell us die now some Protestant
apologists say that Jesus's declaration
should be translated it is paid in full
according to them by saying it is
finished Jesus is saying that nothing
else must be paid or done because of sin
the Protestant apologist Ron Rhodes
writes the following in his book
reasoning from the scriptures with
Catholics he says it is highly
significant that the phrase it is
finished can also be translated Paid in
Full the work of redemption was
completed at the cross nothing further
needed to be done he had paid in full
the price of our Redemption apologists
like Rhodes claim that this means there
is nothing a person must do after making
an Act of Faith in Jesus in order to be
saved since quote nothing further needs
to be done to pay for our sins moreover
no believer undergoes purification after
death through Purgatory because there's
no payment we must make in regards to
our sins and this would include any kind
of temporal punishments related to sin
day hunt says in this context related to
Purgatory quote there is nothing left
for Sinners to pay in order to receive
the pardon offered by God's grace the
debt has been paid in full it is
finished Christ cried in triumphed just
before he died upon the cross to suggest
otherwise is the most serious heresy so
how should Catholics understand what
Jesus said in John 19 30. does it mean
that all we must do in order to be saved
is just believe in Christ and there is
nothing else we must do because Christ
essentially said that our sins were paid
in full when he said it is finished
well Catholics agree with Protestants
that human beings can never remit the
Eternal punishment of sin we can't save
ourselves the catechism says with regard
to God there is no strict right to any
Merit on the part of man between God and
us there is an immeasurable inequality
for we have received everything from him
our creator paragraph 2007 in paragraph
2010 goes on to say since the initiative
belongs to God in the order of Grace no
one can Merit the initial Grace of
forgiveness and justification at the
beginning of conversion so there is
nothing we can do to satisfy God's
justice for the offense caused by our
sins only Jesus Christ who is fully God
and fully man can satisfy God's justice
and remit the Eternal punishment of sin
in fact Jesus didn't just pay for our
sins or the sins of people who believe
even him Christ paid for the sins of
those who don't believe in him and even
of the sins of people who will never
believe in Jesus Christ that's why you
can tell any person you meet that Christ
died for you first John 2 2 says of
Christ he is the expiation for our sins
and not for hours only but also for the
sins of the whole world
the fact that Christ's death paid for or
atoned for our sins does not mean
everything is finished regarding our
Salvation in fact our Lord himself did
things for our Salvation even after the
crucifixion since the Bible says that
Christ's Resurrection justifies us
Romans 4 24-25 speaks of Jesus our lord
who was put to death for our trespasses
and raised for our justification
Saint Paul says if Christ has not been
raised your faith is futile and you are
still in your sins this shows that our
justification even the act of remitting
our sins was not finished when Jesus
said it is finished on the cross we were
Justified at the resurrection
we also have to do something in order to
be saved because if Christ paid for all
of Humanity's sins then the difference
between those who are saved and those
who are damned can only be found in
something the believer chooses to do
that's why some Calvinists say that
Christ only died for the elect so they
speak of a limited or a particular
atonement not a universal one if you
summarize it in a bumper sticker it
might say Calvinism Jesus might have
died for you
but if you believe that Christ atoned
for every human being's sins then there
must be something a Believer does to
have that applied to their souls such as
by being baptized and remaining in
communion with Christ until death John's
gospel records these truths when Jesus
says in John 3 5 unless one is born of
water and the spirit he cannot enter the
kingdom of God and again in John 15 6
when Jesus says if a man does not abide
in me he is cast forth as a branch and
Withers and the branches are gathered
thrown into the fire and burned Christ
sacrificed atones for all sins but the
Bible says that this sacrifice can have
no effect if we reject God through
Disobedience that's the point of the
parable of the unforgiving servant in
Matthew 18. so in that story Jesus told
a king graciously forgave a servant's
debt which would mean the king would
have to incur the himself he would pay
the debt in full instead even but even
though the king essentially declared it
is paid in full by forgiving the debt
the unforgiving servant threatened to
jail another servant who failed to repay
him a much smaller debt so in response
the king revoked his payment and had the
unforgiving servant imprisoned until he
paid his debt which was so large that
biblical Scholars say he could have
never actually repaid it the lesson is
clear God has atoned or paid for all of
our sins but if we refuse to cooperate
with God's grace then the debt can be
reinstated that's why Hebrews 10 26-27
says if we sin deliberately after
receiving the knowledge of the truth
there no longer remains a sacrifice for
sins but a fearful Prospect of judgment
speaking of Hebrews by the way the
author of Hebrews reminds his listeners
that quote all discipline seems painful
rather than Pleasant later it yields the
peaceful fruit of righteousness to those
who have been trained by it Hebrews 12
11. painful discipline is another word
for punishment and so the author of
Hebrews makes it clear that beloved
children of God can be disciplined and
when God disciplines us this yields the
fruit of righteousness but since
children of God do not receive the
Eternal punishment related to sin as
discipline this discipline can only
refer to the temporal punishment of sin
rooted in the disordered attraction we
have to sin because of how venial sin
damages our relationship with God even
if it doesn't destroy it
so we've seen that we can agree with our
Protestant friends that Christ fully
paid for all of our sins indeed Christ
paid for everyone's sins on the cross
but this doesn't mean there is nothing
more we must do to cooperate with God's
gift to Salvation it also doesn't mean
that we don't pay a temporal penalty for
our sins through God's discipline of us
just because Christ paid for the Eternal
consequences of our sins
all right so what did Jesus mean when he
said it is finished on the cross first
he did not literally mean it is paid in
full that can be a truth we glean from
the passage but Rhodes is wrong when he
says we can translate to telistai as
simply paid in full that's not what the
word means it's a form of the Greek word
taleo which just means to end or finish
or complete the idea that it means paid
in full is something of an urban legend
in biblical exegesis it came from
Scholars who noted that receipts from
around the time in the New Testament had
the Greek word tetel stamped on them
meaning it's paid but taytel is an
abbreviation and there are five
different Greek words that begin with
these letters to telesti is one of them
but another is tetelo natai which is a
different word than tetelestai to tell
High literally means tax or paid as
taxes and it can be found on dozens of
receipts where it refers to a tax that
has been paid not a debt that's fully
paid the word tetelestai on the other
hand is used in ancient Greek sources to
talk about finishing art or sculptures
or pieces of cloth not the paying of
debts in the New Testament the root word
taleo is only used for payments in
Matthew 17 24 and Romans 13 6 where it
doesn't talk about paid in full it just
talks about paying taxes according to
one academic article on the subject the
expression to tell is followed by an
abbreviated form of Dia pules through
the gate suggesting that these are
receipts or records of toll payments so
if Jesus did not mean paid in full then
what did he mean when he said it is
finished it could mean Christ's passion
had now come to an end his ordeal on the
cross was now finished or as many
scholars note that Old Testament
prophecies about the Messiah were now
fulfilled or finished through Christ's
sacrificial death look at the preceding
verses which describe what happened
after Jesus entrusted his mother to the
Apostle John after this Jesus knowing
that all was now finished to telesti
said to fulfill teleafe to fulfill the
scripture I thirst a bowl full of
vinegar stood there so they put a sponge
full of the vinegar on hyssop and held
it to his mouth when Jesus had received
the vinegar he said it is finished and
he bowed his head and gave up his Spirit
John 19 28 is the only other place where
tetelestai is used in scripture and when
it's combined with the related word
telefe we see the context is related to
finishing complete eating or fulfilling
the Messianic prophecies of the Old
Testament especially those related to
the death of the Messiah Jesus could
also have been referring to the
finishing of the Last Supper the
Catholic Theologian Scott Hahn has
proposed this hypothesis in his book the
Lamb's supper and in more detail in his
2018 book the fourth cup Han notes that
Jesus conspicuously did not drink from
the fourth cup of the Passover meal
instead Jesus refused to drink wine
until he came into his kingdom and then
before dying Jesus drank sour wine on
the cross Han says it was the Passover
that was now finished more precisely it
was Jesus's transformation of the
Passover sacrifice of the old Covenant
into the Eucharistic sacrifice of the
New Covenant and so now that the
Passover was completed Jesus the
Passover Lamb that had been sacrificed
would now be received by his followers
or eaten just like the old Passover Lamb
was through the Eucharist
this last word of Christ could include
all of these meanings and even others
that have not been explored however we
do know that Jesus did not mean that our
sins had been paid in a way that removes
any obligation on our part to cooperate
with God's grace in order to remain in
communion with Christ John 3 36 puts it
well he who believes in the son has
eternal life but he who does not obey
the son shall not see life but the wrath
of God rests upon him well thank you
guys so much for watching this video I
hope this is helpful to show that when
Catholics and Protestants engage
scripture
in many cases there is significant
overlap and agreement that we have on
what the scripture means and so it's
important to emphasize that
but also to point out when there are
aspects of scripture where the
interpretation goes far beyond what the
original text says in a way that
contradicts what the Catholic Church
teaches so thank you guys so much and I
hope you have a very blessed day and a
blessed Lent
hey thanks for watching this video if
you want to help us produce more great
content like this be sure to click
subscribe and go to
trenthornpodcast.com to become a premium
subscriber you'll help us create more
videos like this and get access to bonus
content and sneak peeks of our upcoming
projects
Continue with YouTLDR
Analyze another video with Pro
Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.
More transcripts
Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Kant: KrV B 59 – 73 – D. Hattrup liest
Dieter Hattrup · German

The Truth Behind Liquidity
Inter Equity Trading · English

Kant: KrV B 46 – 59 – D. Hattrup liest
Dieter Hattrup · German

Kant: KrV B 31 – 45 – D. Hattrup liest
Dieter Hattrup · German

Secrets To Identifying Correct Liquidity
Inter Equity Trading · English

Finding the Daily Bias ONLY Using Liquidity
Inter Equity Trading · English

Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft 1787 (Vorrede B VII) – Dieter Hattrup liest
Dieter Hattrup · German

D. Hattrup liest – C.F. von Weizsäcker: Wahrnehmung der Neuzeit: Einstein
Dieter Hattrup · German

هل يمكن الوثوق بعقلك؟ كيف غيّر هيوم وكانط فهمنا للحقيقة
الفلسفة للنوم · Arabic

Opus 5 released! Is it better than Fable?
Mastra · English

Leilão de Embriões Nelore PO DNA Genética Aditiva
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

Leilão Peso Pesado Rima Agropecuária
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)