MINDBLOWING: Dr. Michael Heiser Explains Salvation Like You've NEVER Heard Before!
And this guy says,
"I'm a Mormon and you're not."
And uh, you know, you're an evangelical,
so am I going to hell?
And I looked at him and I said, you
know, I'm going to answer that question
the same way I would answer it if I was
looking at a Jehovah's Witness, a
Catholic, a fundamental Baptist, a
Lutheran. I don't care. or fill in the
blank. I don't care what your tradition
is. I don't care what you believe about
other things. It doesn't matter because
the answer is always the same. Salvation
is the central theme of not only Jesus's
ministry but of the Bible in its
entirety. We as Christians toss this
term around frequently. But how deeply
have we examined its actual meaning and
contemplated its implications for our
own lives.
Personally, as a child, I was taught
about the dichotomy of the afterlife,
heaven, and hell, and had a cartoonish
view of what this meant in my head. So,
I was under the impression that
salvation as a whole was simply being
rescued from eternal punishment and
being rewarded with eternal comfort.
There's nothing wrong with this
interpretation of the word salvation
because after all, the literal
definition of the word salvation is the
state of being saved or protected from
harm, danger, or a dire situation. And
while being rescued from impending
torment certainly is one aspect of
salvation, the concept of the salvation
that Jesus Christ offers is far deeper
and more profound than just escaping
hell and receiving the promise of
heaven. Even more than just being saved
from eternal punishment is the salvation
from sin. 1 Peter 2:21-25
tells us, "Because Christ also suffered
for you, leaving you an example so that
you might follow in his steps. He
committed no sin, neither was deceit
found in his mouth. When he was reviled,
he did not revile in return. When he
suffered, he did not threaten, but
continued entrusting himself to him who
judges justly. He himself bore our sins
in his body on the tree, that we might
die to sin and live to righteousness.
By his wounds, you have been healed. For
you were straying like sheep, but have
now returned to the shepherd and
overseer of your souls.
Peter tells us that by Jesus's mighty
work on the cross, he bore our sins in
his body. And as his body passed away,
so did our sins. But then he goes on to
tell us that because of this, we too can
die to sin and live to righteousness.
It's an opportunity to overcome our past
and become better, more capable bearers
of God's image, to model our lives after
Christ, the ultimate image bearer.
So the concept of being saved from sin
can be divided into two categories. The
turning away and repentance from sin,
but also salvation from the
repercussions of the sins we've already
committed. In Romans 6:23, Paul tells
us, "For the wages of sin is death, but
the free gift of God is eternal life in
Jesus Christ our Lord."
But beyond this aspect of salvation,
there's an even deeper meaning that
we've yet to uncover in this study.
While the concept of salvation certainly
does encompass the deliverance from sin
and the promise of eternal life, it's
also an image of the kingdom of God
descending to earth of Yahweh dwelling
within us individually and as a whole.
It's the ultimate redemption plan where
God reinstates Eden. The end of the
Bible is its beginning. And salvation is
the movement between those two points in
time. Salvation isn't one particular
moment in time or an event that takes
place in your life. It's the action of
God rejoining his people the way he
originally intended for mankind to
exist. And with this in mind, it becomes
much easier to understand that salvation
isn't merit-based or performance-based.
It isn't a moment when God suddenly
makes us sinless and that we're never
tempted to do wrong again for the rest
of our lives or that we're perfect
sinless humans forever afterward.
With this in mind, I want you to see
this fascinating clip of Dr. Michael
Heiser explaining what he called
believing loyalty because he puts into
context exactly what we're discussing
here and it's absolutely beautiful.
Let's check it out.
>> I want to start though with uh two
anecdotes, two stories, whatever you
want to call them.
And I'm going to be upfront here. You're
going to listen to these and we're going
to go through a bunch of passages this
morning and you're going to be wondering
what in the world do these things have
to do with each other. Okay? So again,
I'm I'm telegraphing that. And I think
you will see again how they do go
together. My first story again this
relates to I mean most of you sort of
know who I am. I I work at Faith Life
Logos. I'm a biblical scholar by
training.
Um, and one of the things that biblical
scholars do every year is we go to our
version of a geekfest.
That is the annual meetings in November
for biblical studies, theology, all that
sort of thing. And one year, I think
it's I think it's probably less than 10
years ago,
I I went with the specific intention of
meeting somebody.
And this somebody was somebody I met
online. I got an email one day that
said, "Hey, you know, you need to go up
go over to this this forum here on the
internet because
your view of Psalm 82, there's this guy
in there defending it and then he's
taking a beating. You know, people are
are really after him." So, I Okay, I'll
go look. So, I went and looked and sure
enough, you know, they're this guy's
trying to defend again what I think is
pretty obviously the the correct way to
look at the passage. And so I threw
something in there and said, you know,
hey, you know, ease up on this guy. You
know, he's he's doing okay. You know,
you know, lighten up essentially. And
the next day I got an email from the guy
taking the beating. And it turned out he
was a professor at Brigham Y Young
University.
He was a Mormon.
And we began a correspondence.
And in the course of our correspondence,
he he let it be known that
yeah, you know, every year I go to the
annual meeting of the Evangelical
Theological Society. And I'm like, why?
You know, you're [laughter] what are you
doing there? And he he said to me, he
goes, we depend on you guys. Because
those of us over in Mormon land who care
about biblical studies, we we really
look for the evangelical scholars to
produce things that we can learn from
because, you know, we're just we're not
so much into that. We do other things
here.
And I said, well, that's fascinating. I
said, "As a matter of fact, this year in
no, you know, this November, I'm going
to be reading a paper critiquing
Mormonism's
understanding of Psalm 82 because I I
don't agree with it."
And he said, "I'm going to be there."
And sure enough, he came. He came
listened to the paper and, you know, had
real nice things to say, and they they
wound up he wound up asking to to
publish it. [sighs]
So that alone was was kind of
interesting. But we went to lunch
afterwards. And so there we there we
are. You know, we get we get our lunch.
We go find a table. We sit down. And he
looks at me and he says,
"Well, I have one question.
I'm a Mormon and you are not. You're an
evangelical.
Am I going to hell?"
Bonapetit.
Just a nice way to begin begin your
lunch there.
Now, I imagine [clears throat] you'd
like to hear what I what I said to him,
correct? Right. You're going to have to
wait.
You're going to have to wait till the
end of the sermon. Here's number two
again. And these things are related even
though they don't seem like it on the
surface.
I got an email. This was probably a
month ago.
And I I I occasionally get emails of
people in
theological distress and it it went like
this. I'm not going to use his name, but
dear Mike,
will you consider covering divorce and
remarage in your podcast?
I am in torment over it. I've heard so
many different views, all of which quote
numerous verses. And now I'm not sure if
I will lose my salvation or not if I get
remarried.
My ex-wife filed for divorce, not me. I
never wanted it. My particular issue is
that the likes of and then we insert
famous preacher names
would say that if I choose to remarry, I
will become an adulterer since it is a
present continuous relationship
and therefore I will not inherit the
kingdom of heaven. 1 Corinthians 6 9-10.
There are people who have divorced their
second spouse because they felt
convicted they were adulterers.
And the question really is, can I lose
my salvation by getting remarried
because I'm choosing to become an
adulterer?
Now, that's obviously a serious email,
[cough]
and I'm not going to tell you what I
wrote back until the end of the sermon.
It's another technique we use.
[laughter]
Now, the the reason I I I bring them
both up is because the answer to both
questions is exactly the same.
It doesn't seem like it, but just trust
me. The answer to both questions is
exactly the same. Now, we began with the
reading in second 2 Kings 5, and we'll
get back there,
but just to sort of recap the story real
briefly and then go into our first
passage in Luke.
and they are connected. Um, you know, we
know the story of Naaman the leper. One
of the, you know, more familiar Sunday
school stories that we hear as kids or
that we tell kids in Sunday school.
Again, Non's a big dude. He's an
important guy. He's a Syrian. He has
leprosy, which is of course a problem.
And the little slave girl, you know,
that ministers to his wife says, "Come
on, dummy. You know, go down there to
Israel and you'll get healed."
And so he takes the trip. He winds up at
the prophet's house. And if you notice,
the prophet doesn't even come out to
talk to him.
Prophet stays in the house and sends
somebody else to the door. Like he
doesn't care who Naan is. You're not
such a big guy.
And the person says to Naamon, "Well,
you know, go go dip yourself seven times
in the Jordan and you'll be clean." And
Naaman has a fit. He's angry,
but he gets talked into doing it. And so
he goes and he dips himself seven times
in the Jordan and he's cleansed. He's
healed.
And then he goes back to Elisha
and says, you know, now I know that, you
know, there there's really no no God,
you know, no true God anyway, um, in all
the earth except for Yahweh of Israel.
And he tries to give Elisha a present,
you know, a gift in return. And Elisha
says, 'N no, we don't need any of that.
And then he says, 'Well, okay, would it
be okay if I take two mule loads full of
dirt
back to Syria cuz I got to go home, you
know, I got to show up for work Monday.
And he's, you know, he explains a little
bit about what why he wants that. You
know, from this point on, I'm not going
to sacrifice to any other god but Yahweh
of Israel,
but I I I have a question, Mr. Prophet.
You know, part of my job is that I've
got to go into the temple of Ramon with
the king.
And, you know, we get the picture that
the king's kind of old, maybe he's a
little feeble or or whatever, but he has
to go in with the king. And he says, 'I
I just want to know that if if while I'm
in there, you know, when I when I bow
down with the king, you know, to to
Ramon, I want to know if that's okay.
I want to know if you know what what
Yahweh thinks of that.
And what does Elisha say?
Shalom. Peace.
You're good.
Now I would suggest that on its own
terms and we're going to talk about this
in in a few minutes that Naaman is a
believer. He's saved in our parlance.
And there's some there's an episode in
the gospels that lends weight to that
and I think nails it down. And that is
in Luke chapter 4. We're actually going
to read all three the episode in all
three synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark,
and Luke. But we're going to start in
Luke here. In Luke 4:16,
this is the scene where Jesus preaches
in his hometown.
And he Jesus came to Nazareth where he
had been brought up. And as was his
custom, he went to the synagogue on the
Sabbath day, and he stood up to read.
And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was
given to him. He unrolled the scroll and
found the place where it was written,
"The spirit of the Lord is upon me
because he has anointed me to proclaim
good news to the poor. He has sent me to
proclaim liberty to the captives and
recovering of sight to the blind to set
at liberty those who are oppressed to
proclaim the year of the Lord's favor.
And he rolled up the scroll, gave it
back to the attendant, and sat down. And
the eyes of all in the synagogue were
fixed on him. And he began to say to
them, "Today, this scripture has been
fulfilled in your hearing."
And all spoke well of him and marveled
at the gracious words that were coming
from his mouth. And they said, 'Is not
this Joseph's son.
And he said to them, "Doubtless you will
quote to me this proverb. Physician,
heal yourself.
What we have heard you did at Capernium,
do here in your own hometown as well."
And he Jesus said,"Truly I say to you,
no prophet is acceptable in his
hometown. But in truth, I tell you,
there were many widows in Israel in the
days of Elijah,
when the heavens were shut up 3 years
and 6 months, and a great famine came
over all the land. And Elijah was sent
to none of them, but only to Zarapath
in the land of Sidon, to a woman who was
a widow.
And there were many lepers in Israel in
the time of the prophet Elisha.
And none of them was cleansed, but only
Naaman the Syrian.
When they heard these things, all in the
synagogue were filled with wrath.
And you know, we we miss a little bit
about what the connection is, but
they're angry.
And they rose up and drove him out of
out of the town and brought him to the
brow of the hill on which their town was
built so that they could throw him down
the cliff.
But passing through their midst, he went
away.
Let's go to Matthew
a second to get there. Matthew 13 53-
58. This is the same episode.
We're going to get a little bit of a
different flavor here.
When Jesus had finished these parables,
he went away from there and coming to
his hometown, he taught them in their
synagogue, so that they were astonished
and said, "Where did this man get this
wisdom and these mighty works? Is not
this the carpenter's son? Is not his
mother called Mary? Are not his brothers
James and Joseph and Simon and Judas?
And are not all his sisters with us?
Where then did this man get all these
things?"
and they took offense at him. But Jesus
said to them, "A prophet is not without
honor except in his hometown and in his
own household.
And he did not do," this is the key
thought here, "he did not do many mighty
works there because of their unbelief."
Okay, store that away and go to Mark
again. Same episode. Mark chapter 6.
Verse one, he went away from there and
came to his hometown, and his disciples
followed him. And on the Sabbath he
began to teach in the synagogue, and
many who heard him were astonished,
saying, "Where did this man get these
things? What is the wisdom given to him?
How are such mighty works done by his
hands? Is not this the carpenter, the
son of Mary, and the brother of James,
and Joseph, and Judas, and Simon? and
are not his sisters here with us?" And
they took offense at him? And Jesus said
to them, "A prophet is not without
honor, except in his hometown and among
his relatives and in his own household.
And he could do no mighty work there,
except that he laid his hands on a few
sick people and healed them." And he
marveled, he thought. He marveled
because of their unbelief.
Now, why? Let's go back to the Luke
passage.
It's the only place in the New Testament
that Naaman is mentioned by name.
In conjunction with the widow of
Zarapath,
why is Jesus
referencing these two people?
Why do they get so angry when he does?
Because Jesus is using them as
templates,
as perfect examples
of faith.
They were believers. They believed.
Let's go back to First Kings 17. Let's
read the widow of Zerapath story.
First Kings 17. We know Naaman believed
because now I know there's no God on all
the earth except in Israel. Okay?
And that's a good example. Jesus
approves of Naaman. But let's just, you
know, throw the widow in here. The widow
of Zerapath. First Kings 17:8.
Then the word of the Lord came to him.
This is Elijah.
Arise, go to Zerapath, which belongs to
Sidon, and dwell there. Behold, I have
commanded a widow there to feed you. So
he arose and went to Zerapath. And when
he came to the gate of the city, behold,
a widow was there gathering sticks. And
he called to her and said, "Bring me a
little water in a vessel that I may
drink."
And as she was going to bring it, he
called to her and said, "Bring me a
morsel of bread in your hand."
And she said, "As the Lord your God
lives,
I have nothing baked, only a handful of
flour in a jar and a little oil in a
jug. And now I am gathering a couple of
sticks that I may go in and prepare it
for myself and my son that we may eat it
and die.
This is all we got. And Elijah said to
her, "Do not fear. Go and do as you have
said, but first make me a little cake of
it and bring it to me, and afterward
make something for yourself and your
son. For thus says the Lord God of
Israel,
"The jar of flour shall not be spent,
and the jug of oil shall not be empty
until the day that the Lord sends rain
upon the earth."
So what does she do?
She believes him.
She went and did as Elijah said,
and she and he and her household, ate
for many days. The jar of flour was not
spent, neither did the jug of oil become
empty according to the word of the Lord
that he spoke by Elijah.
So Jesus showing up in the synagogue
says, "Yeah, I hear all these nice
things you're saying about how well I
read
and you've all heard about the things
that I've done in Capernium and other
places."
And surely somebody here is going to
say, "Hey, physician, heal yourself.
Let's see some of those miracles that we
heard about in Capernium. Can you do
that here?
And Jesus does do a few things, but he
doesn't do what he could do and what he
has done in the past. Why?
He was just shocked at their unbelief.
And to dig at them, he says, you know,
there were lots of widows
in the days of Elijah,
but only one of them had enough to eat
and drink. Only one of them got by, the
one from Zarapath.
And they know the story. They know their
Bible. And there were lots of lepers in
the days of Elisha, but only one of them
was healed.
Naaman, the Syrian.
They know what those two people have in
common.
They had faith.
And by using them as examples, Jesus is
saying, "You people are pathetic.
I'm shocked at your unbelief."
And they get angry.
Now, that's all well and good, but I
actually think even that misses
something.
What do the widow of Zerapath and Non
the leper have in common?
They are pagans.
They are Gentiles.
Naaman lives in Syria.
The widow of Zerapath is in Sidon. This
is Gentile territory. Why is that
important?
Jesus
picks two
people hopelessly cut off
from any of the things that the Jews
around him would think assist them in
their salvation.
They're not elect. They have no temple.
They don't have a Bible.
They're never, you know, let's just
restrict our comments to Naaman. Naaman
is never going to show up at temple.
He is never going to read his Bible.
He is never going to look at a psalm and
think, "Well, this is probably the kind
of prayer that Yahweh likes. I think
I'll pray that."
He doesn't have it. He's never going to
observe a festival. He is never going to
observe one of the feast days, one of
the rituals. He's never going to be
connected to the sacred calendar of
Israel. And oh, by the way, he ain't
getting circumcised either.
In other words, he brings nothing to the
table. He he he is totally emptyhanded.
He brings nothing to the table.
And he goes to Elisha.
Here's his theology.
Hey, I'm clean now.
That's awesome.
You know, now I know that there's
really, you know, Yahweh is the true
God.
And from this point on, whenever I offer
my own little sacrifice, and of course,
Elisha doesn't jump in and say, "Oh,
don't do that. You got to go to the
temple. You're not going to do it right.
Whenever I bring sacrifice,
I'm only going to do it to Yahweh. Can I
take some dirt back with me?"
And then he has this question. He has
this nagging doubt.
I got to be honest with the Elisha. You
know, part of my job is I got to go into
this temple, this temple of this God who
I no longer believe in.
And I just want to know that when I go
in there with the king and we do our
little thing that we're supposed to do,
how does Yahweh feel about that?
In other words,
will Yahweh look differently at his
faith if he messes up theologically?
Does Yahweh know his heart or not? I
mean, that that that's really really
where it's at. He's asking, "Look, when
I do this, does Yahweh know that I know
he is God?
Does he know that?
Does he know that I believe?
And so what does Elisha say?
You're good. You know, shalom.
Go home.
So what's the point?
What I want us to begin to see is we
really need to look, I think, clearly
and differently
at faith, at grace. You know, these
sorts of things. Naaman wants the
prophet to know
that even if he goes and goes off with
the king to the temple of Ramon, his
heart has not changed.
He believes in the God of Israel alone.
And he wants to know if God knows that.
Will God look at me differently?
He has no theology.
He's never going to get any.
He has no work to bring to the table at
all. All he's got is his belief
statement, his faith. That's it.
I think Naaman is actually the perfect
example.
And I think there's a reason why Jesus
endorses him as an example of faith and
the widow at Zarapath because they're
both pagans and they're both Gentiles.
Unlike the Jews around him in the scene
who can say, "Well, we're elect. You
know, we got the temple. We're all
circumcised. We're this, we're that, we
do this, we do that." These two people
can say nothing.
And the implication is that's what
counts.
They have nothing to bring. They have no
single point of merit
about them at all.
Their entire relationship to the true
God, to the God of Israel, is based on
believing that he is who he says he is.
That's it.
Now, you could say, well, you know, the
Israelites knew more. You know, they
they had more information.
They had the law. Well, you know, that
was really important and all that sort
of stuff. Yeah. But let me ask you a
question.
If God looks at two pagans and Jesus
endorses this, because he uses them as
an example of faith, if if God and Jesus
look at two pagans and the only thing
that matters is whose side are you on?
Who is your God?
Who do you believe in? Who do you trust?
If it's good enough for two pagans, why
isn't it good enough for an Israelite?
I would suggest to you that it is.
Now, we look at the Jews, and the Jews,
of course, are going to trust in Torah,
works, calendar, ritual, circumcision,
all these things. And we know from the
New Testament, Paul, you know, when he
gets to talking about grace, he uses
Abraham pre-law, pre-ircumcision, all
this. He's trying to make the point it's
by faith. Salvation is by faith. There
is nothing in it. There there is there's
no little sprinkle of merit, personal
merit and performance has nothing to do
with a right relationship to God.
Not even election.
Because people, oh, they were elect, you
know, blah. Yeah. Well, if if you're
thinking election is a synonym for
salvation in Old Testament theology,
you're wrong. It's easy to prove. It's
this thing called the exile.
Was Israel elect? Yeah. Israelites
elect? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Hey, most of the country, most of them
go off and worship Baal and other gods.
That's why we had the exile.
We don't have Baal worshshiping
Israelites in heaven.
Okay? We have the exact opposite. This
is why the relationship gets severed.
Election just means that they were in a
position to know who the true God was.
They had the oracles of God as Paul
likes to say. They had the truth and
nobody else did. They still had to
believe it.
They still had to believe it. If they
don't believe it, you go off and worship
another god, forget it. This is why the
what's the greatest commandment?
Thou shalt love the Ly. You worship the
Lord your God alone. No, you know, you
bow down and worship no other.
Okay, David. Okay, David's an Israelite.
He's elect. He's the king. God's made a
covenant with him. He commits some of
the most heinous crimes that you can
commit.
But what he doesn't do is he never
changes allegiance.
There's never a question in his mind.
David is he's ridiculous, okay? He's a
parody, okay, of what a believer should
be. He's ridiculous. He's awful,
okay? But what he doesn't ever do is
throw his allegiance to another God. He
does just about everything else wrong.
Okay? But he never does this. And God
has mercy on him.
Now, he pays for his sin in in the
course of life. You know, you sow what
you reap. But as far as his relationship
with God,
he's there. He worships no other.
This is what God wants. I think we need
to start thinking about grace and
salvation. I I like to use this phrase,
believing loyalty.
Believing loyalty.
It has nothing to do with personal
merit.
I believe. And because I believe I am
not going to worship, I'm not going to
follow another god or no god at all.
I might not know anything beyond that. I
might be like Naaman.
I might flunk a theology quiz
spectacularly
and Naaman would have.
[clears throat] But he knows who God is
and that is where he is at. That is the
end of the trail. He is not throwing his
allegiance to any other. Period.
Now, I know again the reason that we're
tracking on this and we're going to
transition to New Testament a little
bit. I know that Christians Christians
struggle with the concept of grace.
Okay, I did. You're not you're not going
to be any different than I was.
And you there just comes a point where
you have to be able to grasp it.
Lots of Christians believe
and then they're troubled.
You know, and you know, it's good to be
sensitive to sin. Okay, we all
understand that.
But if you're thinking thoughts like,
"Does God look at me the same way? Am I,
you know, the guy with the with the the
divorce thing? Am I going to lose my
salvation?
is is God as fond of me today in my
spiritual defeat or in this habit I have
or in this circumstance I've created for
myself because my behavior is
self-destructive.
Does God look at me the same way? Am I
still his? Am I still a child of God? Am
I still going to get to heaven?
I understand why those questions are
asked, but if you're asking them and
you're troubled by them, this is this is
just factually where it's at. You do not
understand the gospel. You do not
understand grace because it has nothing
to do at all with performance. Nothing.
You do things like Naaman. Why does
Naaman ask for dirt? Well, I got to add
this to my faith so Yahweh will be happy
with me. No, he does it because he
believes.
He does what he does because he
believes. He doesn't do it to believe a
little bit more. He doesn't do it again
to stroke Yahweh.
He just wants to know now, does the Lord
know my heart? I got this job. I got to
do this, but when I do it, does he know
that I put nothing into it? I put I I
don't believe in Ramon. Ramon's a jerk.
You know, whatever. I don't believe in
him at all. This is where my my
believing loyalty is at. It's with him.
Does Does Yahweh know that? And is like,
yeah, he knows. You're good.
He brings nothing to the table. Now,
when I became a Christian as a teenager,
I I you know, big big true confession
time here, I would have flunked a
theology test, believe it or not. You
could have asked me about the deity of
Christ. I wouldn't have known what to
say. What's that?
You could have asked me about all sorts
of doctrinal issues that you I hope not,
but maybe you are that you are attaching
to your status as a believer. Well, you
don't believe that? I'm not sure if
you're really saved if you don't believe
in, you know, fill in the blank. Yeah.
Yeah. I got news for you. I wouldn't
have believed in any of it because I
didn't know any of it.
I knew one thing.
Yeah. You know, I was naan.
I got one thing right. Okay. And and
that is sufficient.
That is all God is interested in.
Period. End of story. Now, he knows I'm
a doofus. Okay?
But that's all he cares about. Which
side are you on? Believing loyalty. Are
you wor is this your God? Are you going
to go worship another or no God at all?
Are you going to embrace Christ or
something else or nothing at all?
That's the question.
Now, this is actually consistent in the
New Testament. Go to Romans 5. You know,
we all know this passage.
We all know this passage, but we I think
we need to think about a little bit
more. Romans 5, we're going to read
verses 6-8.
I can find it here.
Romans 5
verses 6-8.
For while we were still weak, at the
right time Christ died for the ungodly.
For one will scarcely die
for a righteous person. Though perhaps
for a good person, one would dare even
to die. But God shows his love for us in
that while we were still sinners, Christ
died for us.
Now, notice
not only what the passage says, but
notice what it doesn't say.
Let me give you a few examples here.
It doesn't say while we were cleaning up
our act,
Christ died for us.
While we were correcting our theology,
Christ died for us.
While we were regular in prayer,
Christ died for us.
While we were faithful in reading
scripture, Christ died for us. Doesn't
say any of this. While we were attending
church regularly,
Christ died for us. While we were having
more spiritual victories than losses,
Christ died for us. You can fill in the
blank. While we while we were not
cheating on our spouses, Christ died for
us. While we weren't doing XYZ, bad
thing, Christ died. It doesn't say any
of that.
In fact, it says the exact opposite.
Couple paraphrases here. While we were
wicked,
while we were alienated from God,
because we wanted to live the way we
wanted to live, because we didn't want
God or anyone else telling us we
couldn't have or do what we wanted,
then Christ died for us. While we were
contemptable human beings,
Christ died for us while we shook our
fist at God. while we couldn't have
cared less.
Okay, Christ died for us. While we
didn't believe or even knew that we
should believe,
Christ died for us.
As soon as you insert any point of merit
into that passage and any point of merit
into the Naaman story,
you defile the gospel. You don't
comprehend it.
You just don't and I know it's hard
again even as a as a Christian because
you are sensitive to sin your mind keeps
going back to this question how does God
look at me how does God you know is it
still the same you know look
while you were a contemptable human
being while you didn't even know you
should believe Christ died for us
it doesn't say anything that you might
be concerned about in the verse so let
the verse go
this is All you need. It's all Naaman
had.
Again, catch the point. Naaman brings
nothing to the table.
He will never get circumcised.
He will never know what the law of God
says or if he's violating it. He will
never go to a feast. He'll never go to a
festival. He'll never hit the temple.
He'll never, you know, like pray the or
sing the psalms or what. He won't do
anything
except he believes that Yahweh is the
true God. And when he does offer
sacrifices, oh, you should use the
priesthood for that. That's defiling,
you know, the ritual washings.
Elisha could have cared less
because he knows God could have cared
less because that isn't the question.
The question isn't did you dip in the
labor, okay? The question is whose side
are you on? And naan had that answer.
That's all he had. Period.
And that is how we need to look. Not
just in terms of a theology lesson. How
were people saved before Jesus? Okay.
No, this is about you. Okay. This is
about us understanding
what the gospel is and is not.
Now, back at our academic conference,
I'm sitting there with my fork in my
hand,
and this guy says,
"I'm a Mormon, and you're not."
And uh, you know, you're an evangelical,
so am I going to hell?
And I looked at him and I said, 'You
know, I'm going to answer that question
the same way I would answer it if I was
looking at a Jehovah's Witness, a
Catholic, a fundamental Baptist, a
Lutheran. I don't care. Fill in the
blank. I don't care what your tradition
is. I don't care what you believe about
other things. It doesn't matter because
the answer is always the same. I don't
care what you are. If you can look me in
the eye, this is the way I said it to
him. If you can look me in the eye
and say to me
that my hope for salvation, the
forgiveness of my sins, my hope for
eternal life is based entirely
on what Jesus did on the cross.
And I bring no merit at all to the
issue. No works, no performance,
nothing. If I can say that I believe
that exclusively what Jesus did on the
cross is is how my sins are forgiven and
my hope of eternal life. If you can look
me in the eye and say that you're in.
If you can't, you're not.
That's just the way it is. Now, I might,
you know, and we talked you a little bit
after. I mean, I might think that your
theology is goofy.
Hey, my theology was goofy when I got
saved. Okay, when I became a believer.
Some people would say, "Your theology is
still goofy, Mike." Okay,
[clears throat] I get that. But that
isn't the question. The question is not,
can you articulate this point of
doctrine to my satisfaction
or to the satisfaction of somebody who
wrote XYZ creed? That is not the
question. The question is upon what are
you basing forgiveness of sins and
eternal life? It has nothing to do with
merit at all.
And he looked at me and he said,
"I'm not completely sure, but I think I
can say that."
And at that point, I'm not going to look
at the guy and say, "Well, you must be a
liar because you're a Mormon.
No, I'm going to look at the guy and
think, I sure hope so, because that's
the gospel. That's what you need to
focus on.
You know, maybe next year we can have
some theological discussion, but this is
the question today. And the and the
question and the answer is going to be
the same no matter who you are. I don't
care what you are. Can you say this or
not?
Now, as far as the email,
here's part of what I wrote back.
Dear XYZ,
the fact that you're not sure whether
you'll lose your salvation over a
divorce and remarage makes me wonder if
you understand the gospel.
Salvation cannot be earned. It was
extended to sinners, not to people in
the process of cleaning up their act.
Romans 5'8.
Consequently,
that which cannot be earned by moral
perfection,
okay? Salvation is not of works and
we're not we're never going to be
perfect. So, it's all it's totally out
of reach. That which cannot be earned by
moral perfection
cannot be lost by moral imperfection.
And to bring it down to the divorce,
salvation wasn't earned by getting
married,
so it cannot be lost by getting divorced
and remarried.
And then I added a few things about, you
know, his situation, but he wrote back
and said that was helpful. Now, we can
look at that and say,
I mean, look, dude, you're in a church.
You know, you're in a How did you not
know this?
It's difficult. It's difficult to
surrender any sense of merit
in part because we're sensitive, you
know, to sin. But you got to get over
the hump that God looks at you based on
something you do. This is not how your
relationship started.
Okay?
Christ didn't die for you while you were
in the process of cleaning up your life.
While you were in the process of
learning to articulate the hypothatic
union and the depth of the incarnation.
Okay? He ain't waiting around for that.
He died for you while you were yet a
sinner.
That's it. Period.
Exclamation point. Really,
that's what you need to grasp. And
again, I know Christians who just
struggle with this. No different than
me, no different than anybody else who,
you know, who, you know, has sort of
come to grips with what grace is.
>> This was absolutely amazing. We don't
earn salvation. We don't gain salvation
by being in the right denomination,
understanding the Bible, or by believing
the right set of doctrines. We're saved
by believing in Jesus. It's really that
simple. Probably the most famous passage
in all of scripture, John 3:16, tells
us, "For God so loved the world that he
gave his only son that whoever believes
in him should not perish but have
eternal life." It's really all about
Jesus. He's the focal point of
salvation. All we have to do is believe
in and love him with our whole hearts
and we're saved.
And each one of us believing in him
brings the kingdom of God here to earth
where he indwells us and leads us to
change the world one moment, one action
at a time. And this is how the fruit of
our salvation begins to grow. As we
continue in salvation, Jesus is able to
continue his earthly mission of bringing
the kingdom of God here to earth through
us. Acts 17:28 tells us, [snorts] "In
him we live and move and have our
being." As we continue to move and live
in him and him in us, the kingdom of God
spreads and inches us closer to the
eternal promise of what we like to call
heaven. And the list goes on of what
we're actually saved from. Jesus saved
us from eternal judgment. He saved us
from the second death. He saved us from
sin. He saved us from being under the
authority of the powers and
principalities of this world. He saved
us from the figurative chaos and
destruction of the sea. He saved us from
the three-fold fall that led to the
depravity of this world. And ultimately,
he saved us from being separated from
him. And he saved us so he can be with
us at all times. Thy kingdom come, thy
will be done on earth as it is in
heaven.
But at any rate, I pray that this video
has been a blessing to you. And if
you've made it this far, please like
this video, subscribe to Dance Like
David, and leave a comment that says,
"Thank you, Jesus, for the gift of
salvation." As any interaction with this
video allows our content to reach and
help more people. [music] And may God
shine his face upon you and give you
peace.
>> [music]
>> Heat. Hey, Heat.
Continue with YouTLDR
Analyze another video with Pro
Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.
More transcripts
Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Finding the Daily Bias ONLY Using Liquidity
Inter Equity Trading · English

Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft 1787 (Vorrede B VII) – Dieter Hattrup liest
Dieter Hattrup · German

D. Hattrup liest – C.F. von Weizsäcker: Wahrnehmung der Neuzeit: Einstein
Dieter Hattrup · German

هل يمكن الوثوق بعقلك؟ كيف غيّر هيوم وكانط فهمنا للحقيقة
الفلسفة للنوم · Arabic

Opus 5 released! Is it better than Fable?
Mastra · English

Leilão de Embriões Nelore PO DNA Genética Aditiva
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

Leilão Peso Pesado Rima Agropecuária
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

النبي .. جبران خليل جبران .. إقرا بودانك
اقرا بودانك · Arabic

Leilão Internacional CIA
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

23° Mega Leilão Genética Aditiva - 1ª Etapa Fêmeas Nelore PO
LANCE RURAL OFICIAL · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

كتاب رسالة الغفران
كتابي المنقذ · Arabic

Erkenntnistheorie 7 Immanuel Kant II
Dominik Finkelde - Hochschule f. Philosophie · English