Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

The Physics and Philosophy of Time - with Carlo Rovelli

54:47EnglishBy The Royal InstitutionTranscribed May 27, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
0:00

it's shocking in my opinion is one of

0:02

the most shocking thing in its fact the

0:04

most astonishing conclusion of modern

0:08

physics which is we now are here what

0:17

now

0:18

means what is the meaning of now well I

0:21

know what is meaning of now for me huh

0:24

you know what is the meaning of now for

0:26

you is it the same now

0:43

thank you thank you for this very kind

0:45

of introduction the first thing I have

0:48

to do is to pull up this which I've

0:53

prepared before you came in let's see if

0:55

it yes sorry which I'm gonna use and

1:01

that would be my high high technological

1:04

equipment to talk about time that would

1:10

be my metaphor of time right time is a

1:12

time is a long line there is a present

1:16

there's a the past of our past more for

1:20

our past this is 10 minutes ago this is

1:22

yesterday it is last year down there is

1:24

Big Bang this is tomorrow and the future

1:27

we don't know so this is this is a

1:29

metaphor of time we're sort of here we

1:34

have one hour whatever with questions

1:37

and and so on so we're gonna cover that

1:39

and I'm gonna tell you that time is not

1:42

like that the message and so what I'm

1:49

gonna what I want to do is to give you a

1:56

sense of where I think we are about

2:01

understanding of this strange mysterious

2:04

things which is time it will be sort of

2:08

a journey for me time has been a an open

2:11

question from my early years and that'll

2:15

say adolescent from all the way through

2:17

my studying of physics and then into my

2:19

work as a physicist you know sort of as

2:21

obsession because quantum gravity

2:25

requires us to rethink what is time I've

2:29

been going around around around this

2:31

this question what is time

2:34

so in the book and in what I want to

2:38

tell you tonight is it's a bit of a

2:40

synthesis so that where we are what we

2:42

know what we think is true including the

2:46

parts that we don't yet know we are

2:48

confused we are confused about and I

2:50

will do it is a taking you to a sort of

2:53

journey

2:54

journey which is back and forth so I'll

2:57

start from this idea of time this long

3:00

line that passes we're here actually we

3:04

moved a little bit already with more

3:06

years and time passes and I'll show what

3:11

quite rapidly tell you what's wrong with

3:14

this idea why this is a wrong idea about

3:17

time and in which sense it is wrong and

3:21

this would be a step sort of down into

3:26

more and more general views of nature

3:29

where time has less and less property

3:31

and loses its pieces so to say all the

3:35

way to what I think is the current

3:39

understanding of the structure of time

3:41

which is that there is very little time

3:43

in nature and that would be the journey

3:47

the one-way journey and then there is a

3:49

journey back which is how from this

3:54

nature at the level of quantum gravity

3:57

which is sort of the bottom level of our

3:59

understanding of the physical world in

4:03

sense of general Eiling generality flows

4:05

how from there we get back to this time

4:07

to the time of our our experience so it

4:10

will be a long one one way and return

4:14

trip where I want you to lose all the

4:19

ideas of time to then sort of understand

4:22

back where where our Comment I come from

4:24

right so this is this is the time of our

4:29

experience first of all it's a long line

4:33

namely what would I mean about a long

4:35

line it's a it's a see what we mean it's

4:38

a sequence of moments instant now before

4:44

later which is ordered like the English

4:50

when they wait for the bus so maybe I'm

4:53

trying to Italian eyes you

4:55

but I don't want you to crowd it for

4:58

getting the next bus but all this

5:03

instant are for milonga along the line

5:06

they're there the one next to another

5:08

one in a one-dimensional thing this line

5:12

is it has a direction right the past is

5:15

completely different for the future this

5:17

is one of the most obvious thing and it

5:19

was trivial thing to say but let me say

5:22

it precisely because then I'm gonna say

5:24

it's not true the past is fix it it's

5:29

given we remember it we know it we have

5:32

traces of it we have books talks about

5:35

the past we have a department of in our

5:39

university that study the past is

5:40

history

5:41

we don't have many departments that make

5:43

a historical history about the future

5:46

there are traces in in in nature if you

5:50

look at the moon there are craters that

5:53

are formed by stones fell into me in the

5:57

past so the pasture is all the spaces

5:59

where memories in our mind the future

6:03

there's nothing like that there's no

6:05

memory no traces still has to come right

6:09

so that's part of this idea that we have

6:11

about time um time has a symmetric

6:15

property maybe we can talk about

6:17

duration of time

6:18

this chart I'm giving this presentation

6:23

for the last 45 minutes certain fix the

6:28

amount of time that we measure with

6:29

clocks and we know what it means this

6:32

interval being equal to this integral

6:34

being equal to this integral in clocks

6:38

measure that in clocks are devices that

6:41

are meant to tell us where we are along

6:43

this line what time is it where is where

6:45

am I is it already tomorrow it's not yet

6:48

in clocks are designed to work all

6:51

together that's the purpose of a clock

6:54

so if you take two o'clock some of them

6:55

apart wait a little bit you bring them

6:58

back together they still have the same

6:59

time if they had the same time if not

7:02

means one crock is broke one clock is

7:03

broken it's not going well

7:05

thank you thoughts um this is a

7:10

retirement a little bit past this is a

7:13

time of our experience now what's wrong

7:16

with this image first of all there's

7:19

nothing wrong obviously

7:21

as long as we carry on our daily life

7:25

it's a very good construction conceptual

7:29

idea about time that works very well in

7:31

our in our daily life but it does not

7:36

work it stopped working when we look a

7:41

little bit more far ahead and the more

7:47

we look far ahead the more this number

7:51

of properties that I described about

7:55

time go away so the main message somehow

8:01

the fool talk I'm giving is a time it's

8:03

not a single thing it's this

8:05

multi-layered concept that has all this

8:09

property that I told you is one

8:11

dimensional as a metric is oriented

8:14

there is the same for every body's

8:16

measured by clock and so on and so forth

8:18

this which in our intuition comes as a

8:20

package is time it's properly thought as

8:24

a combination of properties that we can

8:27

dismount one by one time and sometimes

8:31

this is is layered or is like a mekinese

8:33

likely engine of your scooter you can

8:35

take away one piece the carburetor you

8:37

can take away the piston you can take

8:39

away this you can take away that and

8:41

what remains is not the scooter what

8:44

remains is nothing at all and that's

8:46

going to happen we think when you take

8:49

away this take away that taker with that

8:51

what remains is nothing at all because

8:52

time is a combination of these

8:54

properties so let's see what properties

8:55

one by one the first one maybe I

9:00

mentioned three or four of these let's

9:02

say for to dismantle this idea of time

9:07

some of this you may know depending of

9:11

how much physics you know or

9:13

Shifa you've heard these stories already

9:15

some you probably haven't known some are

9:20

very solid knowledge some are things we

9:23

suspect them I would say the first three

9:25

a very solid knowledge but the

9:28

implications of taking all them together

9:30

are strong so first one clocks measure

9:35

time fine and clocks go all together at

9:38

the same spin speed oh that's wrong why

9:41

is wrong because it's a fact that if I

9:45

take two clocks and if I take two good

9:48

clocks and I move them apart remove one

9:52

or bring one higher and keep one lower

9:56

and I wait a little bit and I move them

9:58

together if these are good enough clocks

10:01

they will indicate a different time it's

10:04

a fact okay it was clearly understood by

10:07

a nice nine hundred years ago so in a

10:10

sense we've been knowing this for

10:12

hundred years but it's recent that we

10:15

actually have good rocks not these that

10:20

we can measure this and today with

10:22

atomic clocks with clocks that measure

10:25

easily one part time with an error one

10:30

in 10 to the 18 17 18 even 19 this is

10:37

very rapid advancing the technology of

10:39

clocks

10:40

so with these clocks you can take two

10:41

clocks at a different of altitude of 40

10:46

centimeters 50 centimeters and measure

10:49

that so the clock up here goes faster

10:53

than the clock down here there's more

10:54

time here there's more time for thinking

10:57

for for growing older for everything so

11:01

there is more time in your your head is

11:04

older than your feet your head as unless

11:08

you've spent all your time upside down

11:12

in which case is the other way around

11:13

okay why well why is it it's

11:20

it's a funny question yes one could say

11:23

why well because we know from general

11:25

relativity that the switch is a big rock

11:28

big mass slows down time so math slows

11:30

down next to it but why I think the

11:37

right question is why not

11:38

why is still this hard for us to digest

11:43

because we're used to time being the

11:45

same for everybody we used is to person

11:48

have the same age and they separate one

11:52

who goes to America the other goes to

11:53

China and they come back after a while

11:55

they still have the same age

11:56

that's our experience but that's not

11:59

right because they've aged it

12:01

differently depending on how they moved

12:03

the paintings have lived ups more up or

12:05

more down and and so on in our

12:10

experience

12:12

these differences are small and smaller

12:15

than our perception of time or the the

12:18

precision of our watches that we we

12:21

carry so we don't we don't we don't

12:23

notice that but if we lived a little bit

12:29

in in the future when I hope there will

12:32

be starships going around a fast speed

12:34

and coming down we will have to get

12:36

confront that so the reason for which we

12:40

think the time is the same for everybody

12:41

is because we used it we got used to

12:45

each by our approximation it's like you

12:47

know if we if you grew up in in the

12:52

Netherlands which is completely flat you

12:54

think that the earth is just all of the

12:57

same level and somebody says you know

12:58

there are some places of the earth with

13:00

us goes down who say no yeah it's called

13:03

mountains Wow right you have never seen

13:07

mountains then so you're surprised we

13:10

live in a region in which this

13:13

difference of time is small so we're not

13:15

used to this if we had a big massive

13:19

black hole not far from here will be

13:21

used to the fact that when you go to a

13:22

black hole you come back everybody else

13:24

as much has grown older than you good

13:28

which means already that this line is

13:31

just

13:32

wrong because the the time between here

13:34

and here two events is not fixed it

13:38

depends whether you were higher or

13:40

whether were lower for instance so it's

13:43

not there isn't a single time in the

13:45

universe already there are many times in

13:49

fact in ice ice and generativity they

13:51

don't have a single time we have one

13:52

time probably for every line good that's

13:57

point one now point to that follow quite

14:01

rapidly from that which in fact

14:02

something that Einstein realized even

14:04

before generative is special activity

14:06

but it has long take long for for

14:10

becoming absorbed because it is shocking

14:15

in my opinion is one of the most

14:17

shocking thing in fact the most

14:19

astonishing conclusion of modern physics

14:25

which is we now are here what now means

14:33

what is the meaning of now well I know

14:36

what is meaning of now for me you know

14:39

what is the meaning of now for you is it

14:42

the same now obviously yes because I

14:45

look at you you look at me and I say now

14:50

you say yes now I hear yes now so we're

14:52

in the same now right then wait a little

14:54

bit look at we are new now so a little

14:56

bit more moved here but we are together

14:58

always together the same now the think

15:02

of a moment when we look her out if I

15:05

look at you do I see you now well not

15:08

really because time lights take time to

15:12

come from you to me right so I see you

15:16

sort of a little bit in the past now

15:19

time takes a few nanoseconds to come

15:22

from you to me so I see you as you were

15:25

a few nanoseconds ago nanoseconds are

15:28

irrelevant but if you were on Jupiter I

15:31

would see you two hours ago and if you

15:35

were on a star I will see you four years

15:37

ago

15:38

close the star and if you were on

15:40

different galaxies and drum and I would

15:42

see millions of years ago so I couldn't

15:45

say now is

15:45

you see I see you and if you look at me

15:49

in the moment I see you you you are

15:51

gonna see me in the past in the future

15:55

for me so between the UIC and the you

15:59

that see me in the moment I see you

16:01

there's an interval between the two

16:02

which is a few nanosecond here

16:06

but few hours in Jupiter and millions of

16:10

year if you were in a different galaxy

16:11

so if the people in a different galaxy

16:14

want to know what we are doing now they

16:17

don't know because they're looking

16:19

somehow there is all this time for so

16:22

one say well alright okay this is

16:24

because it's hard to check but we can

16:26

devise things to say what it means to be

16:30

at the same time for instance I could

16:35

say well I look at you but I know you at

16:36

a certain distance you're in Jupiter but

16:39

I know it takes half an hour I'll take

16:41

four hours light to come here so four

16:45

hours in the future for when I look at

16:47

you that's now okay except that you be

16:53

maybe moving fast and four hours in the

16:55

future could be in my own future

16:58

maybe 10 years in my future so how come

17:02

the now be 10 years the future does make

17:04

any sense so the more you play this game

17:07

the more you realize that it's a

17:09

question which is ill posed there is no

17:11

meaning of now outside the approximation

17:16

in which we can disregard the time light

17:20

goes back and forth so what we mean by

17:23

now is we both look at one another and

17:26

we are in the same temporalities within

17:30

the resolution of time that we have

17:33

which means that the notion of now makes

17:37

sense on a radius on our honor on a

17:40

bubble around us which has a length size

17:45

L which is given by the speed of light

17:48

time the minimum resolution of time that

17:51

we can resolve the delta T we can

17:53

resolve that's the meaning of now there

17:56

is no meaning of now outside

17:58

this bubble with our brain without using

18:05

sophisticated clock to resolve probably

18:07

what a tenth of a second if you're a

18:10

musician you will be better than that a

18:12

tenth of a second light is much bigger

18:16

than the earth it's a big bubble around

18:19

the earth so on the earth we are all the

18:20

same now but it's just this Proxima B

18:26

which is a closest star has its own now

18:29

there's no sense of putting them

18:31

together you can set signal so one to

18:33

the other signal back but in between

18:36

there is no way of saying there's no

18:37

meaning of now and in fact people work

18:40

in general activities they're additions

18:41

work in general activity study solution

18:45

of Einstein equations they know very

18:46

well that this is four-dimensional

18:48

solution there is no preferred now no

18:52

objective now that you can pick up us

18:55

from from physics of from anything why I

19:01

said why this astonishing because what

19:03

is it real what does it mean to be real

19:05

well we are told that what is real is

19:07

real now right it's a Roman Empire real

19:10

no it was real in the past not now ok

19:14

but this now is only local it's

19:18

something happening on a distant

19:20

galaxies real well it may be in the

19:23

future maybe in the past but if

19:25

everything is real in between it's

19:27

confusing because there are things which

19:28

are the past on the future one another

19:30

what did this mean to be real after we

19:34

have understood that the world works

19:36

like that namely that there is not now

19:38

in the universe there are philosophers

19:42

who are discussing there that's why I

19:44

talked the philosopher who are

19:46

discussing that and and and you know

19:49

pulling each other here is and fighting

19:53

the the very meaning of being real of

19:56

reality in the sense of what is real now

19:59

has to be rethought after what we've

20:04

understood about about physics so the

20:05

idea of one insert of time it's

20:07

completely destroyed in our

20:11

little bubble we can talk about instance

20:13

of time that we share provided that we

20:17

don't go too fast we don't we don't not

20:21

precise but globally there is this

20:24

series of events in the universe with

20:29

some temporal relation between a couple

20:33

of them but no common now at all and no

20:37

order no order in the mathematical sense

20:41

two three and this is a little bit more

20:46

complicated and less well understood the

20:52

first well understood the first part

20:55

less understood the second part the past

21:01

is different from the future right where

21:04

there is a local past local future it's

21:07

the past Atif of the future so let's

21:10

forget that other galaxies select loop

21:12

let's look around us and yesterday is

21:15

completely different story than tomorrow

21:17

yes it is fix that we know it tomorrow

21:19

it's open we don't know it good so I'm a

21:24

physicist I want to know where does this

21:27

distinction come from in the laws of

21:30

physics and as you probably know the

21:34

laws of mechanics don't have this

21:36

distinction the laws of electrolyte

21:38

Yeti's don't have this distinction

21:40

Standard Model of particle physics does

21:42

not have this distinction general

21:44

relativity does not have this

21:45

distinction right so all the basic

21:48

equations of physics quantum field

21:51

theory does not have this distinction

21:52

all the fundamental equation of physics

21:54

luckly distinction between past and

21:56

future but for us the past is completely

22:01

different for the future we have books

22:02

written in the past we don't have book

22:03

through it in the future so where does

22:06

this thing shall come from well there is

22:08

a story about that which is there's one

22:14

finds that sees clearly the distinction

22:18

between the past and future with

22:19

thermodynamics and in thermodynamics is

22:22

one law which is a second

22:24

thermodynamics the the second principle

22:28

of thermodynamics that says that entropy

22:30

always grossed over the future so that

22:34

clearly makes a distinction between the

22:36

past and the future fantastic so we've

22:38

found the basic the key fundamental

22:43

grammar of the world the elemental

22:47

machine that distinguish the past or the

22:49

future that law was written by trousers

22:54

19th century but shortly later sometime

22:59

later Boltzmann and his friends marks

23:02

will also but Boston was I think the

23:03

person was greatest clarity understand

23:06

that this law is statistical namely

23:10

Boltzmann understand that is entropy

23:13

this quantity that you can compute

23:14

category and chemistry always compute

23:17

the entropy in in a reaction energy heat

23:21

you do this calculation you get the

23:23

entropy before and to be look after and

23:25

it always goes up Boltzmann understand

23:29

that the entropy is just not a

23:32

fundamental quantity but a measure of

23:34

how how mechanical things are disordered

23:37

right you know that

23:38

entropies disorder that's a great sort

23:42

of understanding that we we got

23:45

footballs but what mean disorder you

23:47

take you take a box you have some green

23:52

balls some red balls you put all the

23:54

green on one side the red on the other

23:56

side this is ordered you mix everything

23:59

this is disordered and if an entropy

24:01

counts exactly that how much order how

24:04

much disorder if they're separated this

24:06

low entropy do your little calculation

24:08

or entropy for mixes high entropy which

24:11

makes a lot of sense because when you

24:13

shake things I get disordered so entropy

24:15

goes up good now you look at these balls

24:19

green and red and your friend is

24:23

colorblind so he doesn't see any order

24:28

because his collar bright it doesn't see

24:31

any order so for him there's no order

24:33

for you to his order but actually is

24:35

worth of that your friend

24:37

a very keen eye that distinguished some

24:39

wolf you were a little small and some

24:41

little bit bit larger much better eyes

24:44

at yours you don't see this difference

24:45

so for him order means all the little

24:50

balls on one side all the big balls on

24:52

the other side so for him the entropy is

24:56

a completely different story so what we

24:59

mean by the order of the world see I

25:01

think you see clearly that order is in

25:04

the eye of the person who looks it's not

25:08

in the things themselves order counts

25:10

once instead of recognizing the balls

25:13

one by one if you if you number all the

25:17

balls and all of you give names to all

25:18

the balls whatever the way you put them

25:20

they are ordered in that particular way

25:24

[Music]

25:25

is only by distinguishing two big

25:28

bunches of balls that you can talk about

25:31

order or disorder and in thermodynamics

25:36

when Boltzmann understands a statistical

25:38

and depending on thermodynamics he

25:41

thinks he understand is that the notion

25:43

of entropy depend on the macroscopic

25:45

variables that you use to describe the

25:47

system on the coarse graining of the

25:49

system which is a simplification of

25:52

description the system which disappears

25:54

if you look at the micro physics of the

25:57

system all right so what does it mean it

26:00

means that this growing of entropy it's

26:05

tied to the approximation we make in

26:09

describing a system it's not fake is not

26:11

illusionary

26:12

but it depends on the way we've we've

26:17

described the system or the macroscopic

26:19

wave we have described the system which

26:20

in turns depend of how interact with a

26:22

system so it's not a mental thing is not

26:25

idealistic thing so the subjective

26:28

things the really concrete things depend

26:30

on the way you interact with a system

26:32

then we interact with the system is your

26:35

interaction with some variables of the

26:37

system which are few out of the many and

26:40

these few determine a coarse graining of

26:45

the microscopic variables and define a

26:47

name to be and then to be gross

26:50

oh this is fine so in the future the MPT

26:54

grows in the past the entropy with

26:56

respect to our coarse graining was slow

26:58

why was it universe all do it in the

27:02

past who order it I mean few if you go

27:06

to your little children little child

27:09

bedroom and they even is a complete mess

27:12

and the morning is an order

27:14

you know why is in order because

27:15

somebody put it in order but why the

27:17

Union who prepared the universe in order

27:19

and the universe in order in the right

27:25

way that looks in order for us mystery

27:28

yeah what does it have to do with time

27:31

everything because the distinction

27:34

between the past and the future is only

27:37

that is this strange order in the past

27:41

and I want you to reflect about that

27:44

because I'm saying something very very

27:46

strong this has been recognized by some

27:49

people I came back in the philosophy of

27:52

science Russell have clear ideas about

27:55

that but few it hasn't permeated I think

27:58

the the the global thinking about the

28:03

order of time everything in our

28:06

experience which is ordered in time is

28:09

because of entropy there is nothing else

28:12

in the world that distinguish the past

28:15

in the future except this entropy

28:18

concretely

28:20

any phenomenon that you can imagine

28:22

where you distinguish future for past

28:26

this an entropy if you if I throw this

28:30

it stops right if you film it and if you

28:34

look at back back backwards

28:36

this is starts by itself so you said no

28:38

no no no that's wrong so this is a

28:42

irreversible phenomenon okay there is

28:47

entropy

28:48

namely this heat what is going on is

28:51

that is friction and the mechanical

28:54

energy of the clock goes into thermal

28:57

energy off the table that go is a little

29:01

bit heated up

29:03

so all the molecules start of the table

29:05

start agitating because of the friction

29:08

and the order the motion of the clock is

29:11

transforming a disordered motion of the

29:14

of the molecules right every time there

29:17

is this thing shoved in the past the

29:19

future is because it's heat this entropy

29:22

this temperature

29:23

involved if there's no heat no

29:25

temperature if this rolls

29:28

this is move without heat it will go

29:29

forever and if you feel and and and

29:32

project it backward it goes forever in

29:34

the opposite direction

29:36

you wouldn't distinctly the future or

29:37

the past any mechanical thing you can

29:40

think about pendulum without friction

29:42

you take a movie you project the

29:45

backward with a pendulum the solar

29:47

system the earth of the moon goes around

29:49

suppose you film it you project it

29:51

backward who can say which isn't the

29:53

right one it's exactly the same motion

29:55

to distinguish in the past in the future

29:56

you need entropy disorder which means

30:04

that the reason we have traces of the

30:09

past has not in the future is nothing

30:10

else that entropy okay if we have a

30:14

texture say something it had to be this

30:21

has had to be some enter production some

30:24

heat some disorder at some point if a

30:28

monk in the Middle Ages in a monastery

30:31

wrote down something and now we know

30:34

something about the middle age because

30:36

we have this text in a world without

30:39

friction the ink would have not stayed

30:43

on the paper would have chopped away so

30:47

you need friction is a the ink glues to

30:50

the paper because it produces a little

30:53

bit of heat that this dissipate and so

30:57

it's some disorder which can happen

30:59

because it was a higher order in the

31:01

past so it is high order in the past

31:03

that determines the existence of traces

31:06

and we think in terms of cause and

31:10

effect

31:11

cause coming first and effect becoming

31:13

after only because of the second

31:16

dynamics because of entropy otherwise

31:18

there could be no dis symmetry

31:20

no physics says that the physical if

31:22

this is connected to that this is

31:23

connected to that both way we cannot say

31:26

this causes this more than this causes

31:29

that because the symmetric Russell used

31:31

to say that the notion of course would

31:34

disappear is wrong it doesn't belong to

31:37

physics it would be recognizes as

31:41

something what is it

31:44

totally useless and mistakenly

31:46

mistakenly considered non damaging like

31:51

the British monarchy and and and sooner

31:57

or later we'll get rid of it he was

31:59

wrong but we'll come back why why he was

32:04

wrong the point is that the entire

32:07

distinction between past and future is a

32:10

microscopical effect due to the fact

32:14

that under our perspective the past look

32:19

more ordered so not only the instant of

32:24

time is not aligned because every line

32:27

in the universe has its own it's on its

32:30

own temper allottee not only makes no

32:33

sense to take one to talk about the now

32:35

of the universe but the distinction with

32:39

one direction of time they are the

32:40

direction of time is some strange

32:42

microscopical effect which you don't see

32:44

in the micro physics 3 oh boy time is

32:48

passing fast us

32:50

I should speed up I am gonna speed up

32:55

because the fourth reason for which the

32:57

our community of time is completely

32:59

wrong is less solid than the first three

33:01

first two is science of unison very well

33:04

the fourth reason is the science that I

33:07

do so it's less solid why because I'm

33:10

still doing it right it's not yet in the

33:13

textbook i and all my friends we're

33:15

working on and the point is that there

33:19

is a connection which I just mentioned

33:21

before between time and gravity gravity

33:25

the mass effect

33:27

the speed of time but we know that

33:30

gravity that the understanding way of

33:32

gravity may disregard quantum mechanics

33:34

so this is the proper quantum gravity

33:36

this job of my life so I'm paid for to

33:39

try to write the equation for quantum

33:42

gravity there are a set of equation that

33:46

we have written down for describing the

33:49

quantum properties of gravity and these

33:52

equations tell us something about this

33:58

what the clock measure and tell us I

34:01

would say three things one is that a

34:05

anything that works like a clock cannot

34:09

measure time local time continuously

34:11

because there's a minimal amount of time

34:14

so there is something granular in the

34:16

passage of time I understand that in the

34:18

UK there is a current debate on children

34:23

not being able to read analogous clocks

34:27

so they only read the digital clocks so

34:30

they come out with the wrong idea that

34:32

time is discrete that is digital right

34:34

which is the right thing so very good I

34:38

don't see why kids should be able to

34:40

read digital clock I wasn't very good in

34:43

reading digital clock when I was a kid

34:45

because I didn't use clock so Chinese

34:49

digital as a very short scale of course

34:51

not seconds of fraction of a second of

34:53

the Planck scale 10 to the minus 44

34:55

seconds very very small time intervals

35:01

but that's a minimal timing there's no

35:03

smaller time interval than that not only

35:06

that but the clocks itself because a

35:08

quantum object everything's a quantum

35:10

object can be in super positions of

35:12

different position of the handle a

35:15

different reading so you cannot say that

35:18

between this event and this event is a

35:20

certain amount of time there because as

35:22

always in quantum mechanics there could

35:24

be a probability distribution of time

35:27

passing from one and the other so you

35:29

see that everything you use to think

35:33

about time disappears when you go to the

35:36

widest possible

35:38

situation which is quantum gravity which

35:40

you keep into account everything we know

35:42

about the world world today in fact in

35:45

the equations of look onto gravity the

35:47

theory which I'm working brings together

35:50

quantum mechanics general activity in

35:52

the equations of that theory there is no

35:54

time variable at all why because you

35:57

don't need a time variable you have a

35:59

lot of variables you have a lot of

36:01

clocks you have a lot of things that

36:02

change at the basic level time is just

36:07

any way of counting the change of

36:11

something which by the way is the

36:13

definition of time that Aristotle gave

36:17

25 whatever centuries ago time is a

36:20

number of changing you look at something

36:22

changing day night day night day night

36:25

you count and this is time time is a

36:28

counting of change then Newton came out

36:31

with this idea

36:32

you completely knew that time is not

36:35

just a changing of something but it's

36:38

some uniformly flowing something that

36:44

flows irrespectively of whether is

36:47

matter changing or not is completely

36:50

Newtonian idea is a new idea it is in

36:53

your mind because you studied it at

36:54

school because it's a permeated our

36:56

society but it's not the old way of

36:57

thinking about that the old way of

36:59

thinking about time is that you see sink

37:00

changing you number them she's fine

37:03

but Newton comes up we said well there

37:05

is that way of seeing of times it's not

37:07

other way of thinking of time my

37:08

newtonian way which is the time just

37:12

passes even if nothing changes then I

37:15

still recognizes that this Newtonian

37:18

time in this Newtonian space which also

37:21

you to introduce city of empty space

37:23

there's nothing else about space um are

37:26

actually the gravitation field it's

37:30

nothing else the gravitational field so

37:31

I think in a sense says oh yeah you're

37:34

right Newton that there is something

37:35

else beside the counting of things

37:38

there's this absolute time maps of space

37:40

but you're wrong in not seeing that

37:44

these are dynamical object is just

37:45

electromagnetic wave it's just a little

37:48

magnetic field this is a gravitational

37:50

field so it's a sort of

37:52

something that fills up everything which

37:54

is the Einstein four-dimensional a

37:57

curved space-time and once you realize

37:59

that this ice and four dimensional

38:01

curved space-time which is a

38:02

gravitational field as quantum

38:03

properties it can be in superposition is

38:05

granular it has all the funny thing

38:08

there does all the funny things up when

38:09

two things do the Newtonian time is a

38:12

completely exploded it depends on the

38:15

interaction is granulars

38:16

different point of point there is two T

38:19

Leontine the basic idea that you can

38:21

count event still there so in quantum

38:25

gravity of events not order it in line

38:29

that the British but all confused like

38:31

the Italians connected to one another

38:34

you can follow this one this one this

38:37

one and you can see okay doing this blah

38:39

blah blah number of things happened so

38:41

this moved a certain number of clicks

38:43

and so you can have a local notion of

38:46

sequence of event which is a minimal

38:49

notion of time and that's the only thing

38:51

that remains locally probabilistic

38:54

discrete without a prefer a time

38:57

variable anything at work as a variable

38:59

and that's the no time the minimum time

39:02

of quantum gravity I promised you a

39:06

journey back so I have less time

39:09

remaining because I was supposed to

39:11

finish here and already here to take you

39:14

back so I hope I convinced you well I

39:18

don't hope I convince you I hope I gave

39:20

you a sense of the very very weak

39:25

temporal notion needed to do fundamental

39:27

physics I've written a paper whose title

39:31

is forget time so write the fundamental

39:35

equation of quantum gravity and if you

39:36

don't see there which one's the time

39:38

variable don't worry you don't need a

39:40

time variable because the time variable

39:41

is something microscopic not something

39:45

down there down there if many variables

39:48

change one or respect to another how do

39:52

we go back from there from that

39:57

basic reality we have to find the

39:59

conditions under which we live which

40:03

allow us to talk about this long line

40:06

oriented and common which is time and

40:08

this is a number of steps there are many

40:10

steps different levels different layers

40:13

each one is interesting by itself but

40:16

they're separated time doesn't come up

40:18

off in one step comes up at various

40:21

levels first of all the granularity of

40:24

time is so small we don't have such

40:28

precision so we don't see it

40:30

this flow we can see it continues the

40:34

quantum mechanical superposition aspect

40:36

of time we are big and heavy and much

40:41

work at scale much larger than the

40:43

Planck constant which is what determines

40:46

the quantum mechanical effect so we

40:48

don't see it so we actually see a

40:51

gravitational field as a continuous

40:53

things like I stand described but we

40:56

live in a region in which gravity is

40:58

very very weak compared to black hole

41:01

though is really strong and is very very

41:04

weak essentially this nice thing curved

41:07

space time is flat and this is flat

41:10

Einstein space time are assembled very

41:13

much Newtonian space in Newtonian time

41:15

not exactly because link Oskie

41:17

space-time but very much but we don't

41:23

move fast to respect one respect to one

41:25

another so we can disregard the time

41:28

back and forth of the light and we are

41:30

so so we can assume that light instead

41:32

of going a finite speed goes at infinite

41:34

speed because now experience life is

41:37

sent essentially infinite velocity don't

41:41

resolve the light travel at a time

41:44

travel of light so if time is a at

41:47

infinite speed then we have these

41:49

surfaces of simultaneity we can think

41:53

that we're in this in our bubble and so

41:56

we can talk about one single time right

42:00

so now we have a one-dimensional line

42:03

which is still not oriented past and

42:06

future so what is it oriented it past if

42:09

you

42:09

well let's go slowly first of all

42:12

remember it's entropy entropy depend on

42:19

the way we look at the world or the way

42:21

we interact with respect to the world so

42:24

I think and take this as an hypothesis

42:28

not as something demonstrated some of my

42:30

colleagues disagree that what makes

42:35

entropy low down there in the past

42:39

saying the early universe entropy was

42:41

very very low he's not the fact that the

42:44

universe was arranged in a very ordered

42:46

way the universe was arranged whatever

42:48

it was a you arranged is the fact that

42:51

we look at the universe we interact with

42:53

the rest in a way which is very

42:56

particular because we are particular we

42:58

meaning we as a physical system

43:00

interacting with the race though such

43:02

that under this perspective the past was

43:07

special imagine you take a cart you mix

43:10

them you look at them and you remember

43:14

the order okay that order disappears

43:18

when you mix again so you see a

43:21

increasing of disorder but that order

43:23

was special because you decided to a

43:25

special you looked at them and learned

43:27

it so in some sense we are special

43:31

subset of the universe that interact

43:34

with the rest of the universe in such a

43:35

way then the past looks ordered to us

43:38

what is special is not the universe is a

43:41

subset of the universe to which we

43:43

belong this is called area the Pacific

43:45

title origin of entropy and I think it

43:51

could be an ingredient for understanding

43:53

why the past even for the future there's

43:55

nothing special in the early universe is

43:57

special the microscopy the coarse

43:59

graining that we do are we done not yet

44:04

not yet and there is a last step and to

44:09

me this has been the greatest surprise

44:12

and here I'm stepping a little bit out

44:15

of my own comfortable zone but it's what

44:17

I've been learning and learning and

44:18

um there is something about time which

44:22

is still missing

44:23

and there are some philosopher even some

44:25

physicists who says we have got the

44:27

entire story wrong because time flows

44:30

train passes time sort of passes at a

44:33

certain speed and we don't see that in

44:36

all this physical picture so maybe there

44:39

is some fundamental fundamental

44:40

fundamental law of time that says after

44:43

all there is this passing of time I

44:44

think they're right they're wrong and

44:47

and and many other colleagues of mine

44:51

including many Philosopher's

44:52

increasingly getting convinced that what

44:57

we refer to when we refer to this

44:59

flowing of time this passing of time

45:01

this clear feeling that we have about

45:06

the flowing of time is not in the

45:09

quantum gravity is not in generative it

45:11

is not in quantum mechanics is not in

45:13

thermodynamics is in the specific way

45:16

our brain works and there is an enormous

45:20

amount of working today in the

45:23

neurosciences in the function our brain

45:26

with a title of a book by a

45:28

neuroscientist called dilben Amano

45:30

a recent book in America if the title is

45:33

your brain is a time machine what does

45:35

it mean the way the brain works is to

45:38

exploit this entropy gradient and the

45:41

fact there traces of the past to build

45:44

memories and in terms of this compute

45:47

the future and anticipate the future

45:50

that's basic working of the plane

45:52

according to one of the importance of

45:54

how the brain works so the brain is the

45:56

time machine brings us continuously sort

45:58

of grasping to some events in this

46:01

confused set of events around ask we are

46:05

connected by traces to some event tour

46:07

the past we are connected by

46:09

anticipation on the other direction so

46:13

in our mind there is this opening space

46:17

okay you think that this is a metaphor

46:22

of what this is metaphor our memories of

46:26

some of the past and in fact that's why

46:28

is much more confused over the future

46:29

because we don't have

46:31

of the future when we think about time

46:33

very often we're not thinking about the

46:36

physical part of the physical future but

46:38

we are considering the memories we have

46:41

about physical person and and the anta

46:44

patient we have about the future um

46:46

philosopher has been saying that for a

46:48

very long time who sir has been saying

46:51

that it goes back to st. Augustine

46:53

famous pages about the nature of time in

46:57

his book the confessions he says when I

47:05

listen to music I get a meaning from a

47:10

musical phrase but I never listen to the

47:15

phrase I listen to one note at a time

47:17

right if I listen to one note how do I

47:20

know about the previous notes okay get

47:23

the meaning well of course I know

47:24

because I remember them but if I

47:27

remember them and who sir is very clear

47:29

in that the meaning comes from the notes

47:32

beings playing now and the memories of

47:36

the previous one so it's all in the

47:39

present so to say and it can be only the

47:41

present together because as memory but

47:45

it's more than that

47:45

because since the brain is designed by

47:48

evolution to use memory to anticipate

47:50

for a purpose because it it designed to

47:55

try to get somewhere that that's how

47:57

living evolution design our our our

48:00

behavior then all this is strongly

48:05

emotionally charged the passage of time

48:08

is not for us a rational thing to

48:11

contemplate it's something we live in -

48:14

we are the past this passage of time

48:16

where this constant computing of time

48:18

you can think about reality without

48:21

space we can think about reality without

48:24

things you can say it's very hard to

48:26

think yourself in a reality without time

48:28

you wouldn't know how to start thinking

48:31

but the confusion is is this because

48:33

rarity by itself cannot be thought

48:35

without time no is because our thinking

48:38

cannot be talked about time we cannot

48:41

think

48:41

we are a time machine not the universe

48:43

use a time machine you use just a bunch

48:46

of thing of events vertically connected

48:48

to one another which in some

48:49

approximation are nicely ordered but

48:52

what we think when we think about time

48:54

is the personal of the memory and in the

48:59

anticipation give us the sense that we

49:02

are in this space right all of us what

49:06

is the real time real time is now ten

49:08

minutes ago my life but then I've been

49:10

to school so I know about all the kings

49:13

of England

49:14

so this long line right the line of the

49:16

kings of England in Queens and and so I

49:20

have some extended memory which is a

49:21

cultural memory I've studied physics and

49:23

cosmology so I have this memory longer

49:26

it's all today it's all my knowledge

49:29

days all here in the book I talk about

49:32

post post as the reason has written this

49:35

fantastic novel in search of lost time

49:39

it's all about time he says that

49:42

explicitly section of the meaning of

49:45

time and the novel is full of stories

49:48

character things but then novel is

49:50

presented not as what is happening in

49:53

the world or what has happened in the

49:55

world but as the memory of the main

49:58

character whose name is probably Marcel

50:04

so all the 3,000 pages of Proust novel

50:08

are about what's in this you know five

50:12

inches between the years of Marcel it's

50:15

all here and that's the greatest

50:17

intuition of truth to understand what is

50:22

time for us we have to look at the

50:23

specific of our brain functioning more

50:28

than the temporal structural universe

50:31

itself of course these religions were

50:33

not saying that temple structures unit

50:35

still is irrelevant but I'm saying that

50:38

by looking only at the temporal

50:40

structure of the units you always get

50:41

the feeling that there's something

50:42

missing with respect to the time of our

50:45

experience and so you do metaphysical

50:49

speculation about the primary key of

50:51

time to completely wrong because of

50:53

course there's something

50:54

because doesn't pertain to the

50:56

fundamental strike for us it pertain to

50:58

the way our brain machine works and last

51:05

point it's truly emotionally colored

51:10

time is not emotionally neutral to us

51:14

precisely because we are our brain is a

51:19

machine designed to tell the story about

51:22

the past and do something in the future

51:25

we are full of motivation hunger if

51:28

thirst

51:28

we have ambition with curiosity with

51:30

love with hate that's what we are

51:33

before being rational beings and this

51:36

drive is the drive of the brain that you

51:41

know control our hostesses and and and

51:44

and and struggle to make us survive and

51:47

do better because evolution wants us to

51:49

be like that it's already entering time

51:53

it's all in time so time is emotionally

51:57

charged for us time is what brings us

51:59

things we want is the opening of the

52:01

future okay in time is what is motional

52:04

charge for us because it makes us lose

52:06

thing constantly all the time in in in

52:09

in Buddhism there is the speed

52:14

psychological side I think the main

52:16

truth of Buddhism IRS's life is

52:18

sufferance but the second is that the

52:19

life is sufferance because we have

52:22

difficulty of dealing with impermanence

52:24

with time so time is a source of our

52:27

suffering we suffer because we lose

52:29

thing or because we have lost things or

52:32

because we shall we think we will lose

52:33

things so it's we're gonna die so this

52:36

is a quintessential

52:37

source of anxiety for for human so x is

52:41

strongly colored emotionally and why I'm

52:43

saying this because I think if we think

52:46

that this emotional side of time is a

52:51

sort of fog that does not allow us to

52:55

see the real nature of time we are

52:58

confusing yourself because this

53:01

emotional aspect of time is precisely

53:04

what is deeply time for us

53:06

time for us is this emotional connection

53:11

to the event of the world that go away

53:14

that pass that flow that we lose and

53:20

this is a looot of our strong sense of

53:24

passing time and feeling feeling time is

53:26

ingrained working of our of our brain

53:31

this is vaguely connected to this event

53:33

it works because it's entropy of course

53:35

because it our scale we can orient Orion

53:39

things like like like this but you see

53:42

understanding time means bringing out

53:47

the pieces of the of the of this layer

53:50

the complex object time is not a single

53:53

thing is all my grass is not a single

53:56

thing is all these layers that come from

53:59

approximation from this regarding aspect

54:02

of nature from thermodynamics from our

54:06

particular relation to the world n from

54:09

our function if our brain including this

54:13

emotional level out there the more we go

54:17

general in the picture of the universe

54:19

the more time loses species there is a

54:21

very weak form of temporality and in

54:24

closest to us I think the strong

54:28

emotional connection with time the

54:30

motion of time is what time is for us

54:44

you

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.