Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Morgan Housel: What You Need to Master (And Avoid) to Get Rich, Stay Rich, and Build Wealth

1:34:161,596 summary words · ~8 min readEnglishTranscribed Jun 28, 2026
Summary

True wealth is not a function of financial intelligence or hyper-active market trading, but rather of psychological endurance, the systematic minimization of FOMO, and maintaining a persistent gap between your net worth and your expectations.

By shifting focus from spreadsheet optimization to emotional and temporal autonomy, individuals can avoid the self-destructive status traps and psychological burnout common among high-net-worth achievers.

Section summaries

0:00-7:06

The Rationality of Irrationality: FOMO, Kahneman, and Luck

watch

Morgan Housel establishes that a total lack of FOMO is the single most vital trait for long-term capital accumulation. He uses Daniel Kahneman's cognitive framework to show how purchasing lottery tickets—which looks mathematically absurd on paper—is a highly rational purchase of hope for individuals who feel structurally locked out of traditional career mobility. He then challenges popular self-help culture by defining true luck as systemic variables completely outside personal control, such as one's country and era of birth, citing a striking statistic that brothers' incomes correlate more highly than their physical genetics.

  • Susceptibility to FOMO is a fatal behavioral flaw that prevents compounding.
  • Financial choices that appear irrational on a spreadsheet are often highly rational adaptations to a person's subjective reality.
  • True luck is comprised of massive, unrepeatable environmental factors that cannot be engineered by working harder.

It frames the foundational behavioral economics and sociological perspectives of the entire discussion.

7:06-16:34

The Math of Inaction: Buffett's Endurance and Indexing Mechanics

watch

This section examines how Warren Buffett accumulated 99% of his net worth after age 60, proving that endurance is the real driver of compounding. Housel outlines how the investment world features a unique negative correlation between active effort and long-term performance, due to transaction costs and psychological tampering. He explains that static index portfolios outperform dynamically managed ones because they guarantee ownership of the extreme, unpredictable tail-end winners that drive the vast majority of overall market returns.

  • Compounding is returns to the power of time; survival and longevity are the only variables that truly matter.
  • Investing is one of the very few human endeavors where doing less work consistently yields superior results.
  • Broad index funds work because they ensure you automatically capture the rare, highly concentrated market tail-events.

Provides a comprehensive and highly counterintuitive explanation of compounding and index fund mechanics.

16:34-23:40

Spreadsheet Rationality vs. Psychological Reality

watch

Housel discusses the critical importance of keeping expectation inflation well below net worth growth. He shares his own 'irrational' decision to pay off a low-rate 3.2% mortgage, arguing that this technically suboptimal move was his best money decision because it provided invaluable psychological peace of mind. He critiques standard financial education for treating money as a purely mathematical optimization problem, ignoring that it is actually a qualitative tool to secure personal freedom.

  • Expectation inflation is the ultimate silent destroyer of wealth and life satisfaction.
  • A financial decision can be mathematically wrong on a spreadsheet but entirely correct for your psychological well-being.
  • The primary purpose of money is to buy control over your time, not to maximize an abstract numerical score.

It highlights the core tension between quantitative financial formulas and subjective qualitative happiness.

23:40-35:30

The Pathology of Outliers: Hidden Wealth and the Tortured Achiever

watch

The conversation shifts to defining wealth as the consumption options you choose not to display, making true wealth naturally invisible and hard for society to model. Housel and Parrish dissect the psychology of extreme business founders, profiling them not as healthy, passionate role models, but as tortured souls driven by pathological anxiety or deep feelings of inadequacy. They analyze the absolute existential sacrifices made by figures like Bill Gates and Elon Musk, reminding viewers that outsized outcomes require taking on a highly dysfunctional psychological package.

  • Richness is current consumption displayed; wealth is future options saved.
  • Outsized corporate and economic success is frequently powered by deep-seated psychological pain or chronic anxiety.
  • Envying an outlier's success requires accepting the baseline suffering and absolute sacrifice that produced it.

It offers an incredibly powerful, sober antidote to status envy and superficial success worship.

35:30-47:20

Ingrained Frugality, Dynastic Ruins, and the Power of 'No'

watch

Housel contrasts his parents' early frugality—which bought them retirement autonomy—with the Vanderbilt family, who systematically blew a $400 billion fortune across three generations because they viewed wealth purely as a consumption scorecard. He highlights Anderson Cooper as the happiest Vanderbilt heir because he was freed from the psychological burden of dynastic wealth and forced to build his own career. Housel also explains that managing personal success requires ruthlessly saying no to preserve time and prevent complexity from degrading your work.

  • Frugality learned during poverty acts as a permanent behavioral asset once wealth is achieved.
  • Dynastic wealth often acts as a psychological burden that strip heirs of ambition and self-actualization.
  • Creative success requires a ruthless commitment to saying no to maintain control over your schedule.

It uses concrete historical and personal narratives to demonstrate how family modeling shapes financial destiny.

47:20-59:10

The Hidden Debts of Capital and the Quiet Car Paradox

watch

Housel explains that acquiring money brings a hidden 'social debt' in the form of subtle expectations from peers, family members, and business networks to elevate your lifestyle or rescue others financially. He introduces the 'quiet car paradox' on trains, where having high expectations of peace makes commuters highly anxious and explosive at the slightest whisper. He quotes Will Smith to demonstrate how wealth can induce depression by removing the hopeful illusion that material abundance will someday solve your psychological wounds.

  • Accumulating capital scales your social debt, creating invisible pressure to fund your social ecosystem.
  • High expectations create a fragile psychological environment where trivial disruptions feel like major crises.
  • Wealth strips away the comforting psychological fantasy that more money will fix your internal unhappiness.

Introduces the deeply profound psychological concepts of social debt and expectation-driven fragility.

59:10-1:11:00

Socioeconomic Inequality and the Fragility of Capitalism

optional

The discussion covers the challenge of raising unspoilable children in affluent environments, with Housel advising parents to lead by example and avoid modeling money as a human scorecard. He then analyzes the systemic macroeconomic threats to capitalism, warning that while unequal outcomes are natural and ideal, unequal opportunity is highly destabilizing. He points out that when too large a percentage of the population feels structurally trapped at the bottom, they lose faith in the system and become susceptible to extreme, authoritarian political ideologies.

  • Children learn values by observing parental behavior and emotional reactions, not from explicit lectures.
  • Capitalism is secure only as long as the vast majority of citizens believe they have a fair shot at upward mobility.
  • Severe, prolonged economic deprivation quickly degrades civilized social norms and breeds political extremism.

While highly insightful, this section shifts from individual financial behavior to macro-sociological concerns.

1:11:00-1:20:28

The wide Funnel of Curation and the Leverage of Storytelling

watch

Housel outlines his active curation strategy, advocating for an incredibly wide reading funnel combined with a guilt-free, merciless filter that discards dry or unengaging books. He explains why human psychology is optimized to retain narratives rather than raw statistics, noting that stories act as cognitive leverage. He details filmmaker Ken Burns' obsessive editing techniques—such as aligning narrator vocals precisely with background music beats—to show how strategic storytelling captures deep human emotion.

  • Execute a ruthless, guilt-free filter on books to maximize your exposure to genuinely valuable ideas.
  • A story is cognitive leverage; statistics inform the brain, but narratives change behavior by evoking emotion.
  • Effective communication requires aligning narrative rhythm, emotional tone, and extreme simplicity.

Provides immense, actionable value for anyone interested in writing, marketing, or general communication.

1:20:28-1:32:18

Writing for Yourself, Comedy as Psychology, and Real Success

watch

In the final segment, Housel advises writers to write exclusively for themselves to maintain voice authenticity, while remaining hyper-aware of reader impatience by getting directly to the point. He compares his creative process to that of professional comedians, who test material in small, low-risk venues, sharing how he tested his famous 'stutter' blog post before its viral release. The interview concludes with Housel defining true success as raising balanced, self-sufficient, and happy adults rather than simply building a financial legacy.

  • Authentic writing is produced by writing for yourself, then editing ruthlessly to accommodate reader impatience.
  • Use highly interactive, low-risk platforms as intellectual laboratories to pressure-test concepts.
  • True personal success is measured by the psychological health and character of your children.

Synthesizes Housel's entire professional creative process and his personal philosophy of life.

Key points

  • The Conceptual Split Between Being Rich and Being Wealthy — Being 'rich' is defined by current consumption, highly visible lifestyle assets, and the income necessary to cover current debt. Conversely, 'wealth' consists of unspent assets, hidden option value, and capital saved specifically to purchase temporal independence.
  • The Negative Correlation Between Effort and Outcome in Investing — Unlike physical fitness or professional careers where intensity of effort directly scales with performance, long-term investing rewards extreme passivity and inaction. Because market returns are driven by a highly concentrated, unpredictable tail of extreme winners, a static index strategy systematically outperforms active portfolio manipulation.
  • Expectation Inflation and the Psychological Cost of Wealth — Acquiring capital introduces 'social debt' (the pressure to fund peers and escalate lifestyles) and 'expectation debt' (hyper-sensitivity to minor disruptions). When material aspirations grow faster than net worth, the psychological buffer of hoping that more money will resolve your inner anxieties is permanently shattered.
  • The Barbell Strategy of Getting Rich vs. Staying Rich — Building wealth requires the audacious, optimistic risk-taking of an entrepreneur, whereas maintaining wealth requires acute, paranoid conservatism. A successful long-term strategy requires structuring your balance sheet to accommodate both personalities simultaneously—holding highly conservative cash cushions alongside aggressive, decades-long stock holdings.
getting rich and staying Rich are completely different skills Morgan Housel
wealth is the money that you don't spend Morgan Housel

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:00

not having fomo is the single most

0:02

important Financial skill I think it's

0:04

so important that you cannot ever

0:05

imagine accumulating significant wealth

0:07

over your lifetime if you are

0:09

susceptible to fomo like if there's

0:10

literally one thing like one trait that

0:13

you want that's going to allow you to

0:14

accumulate wealth it's the lack of fomo

0:16

why do index funds work so well two

0:18

reasons one is it's always going to be

0:20

the case that a very small number of

0:22

stocks account for the majority of

0:24

returns the other is I think the whether

0:27

it's like an investing debate or a

0:29

saving or spending debate they're not

0:30

actually debating it's people with

0:31

different personalities talking over

0:33

each other and once you come to terms

0:34

with that there's not one right answer

0:36

for any of this what's the difference

0:38

between being rich and being wealthy

0:40

rich is when you have enough money to

0:42

make your mortgage payment make your car

0:44

payment you can pay off your credit card

0:45

bill every month wealthy I think is when

0:47

you have a degree of Independence and

0:49

autonomy the weird thing here is that

0:51

wealth is the money that you don't spend

0:53

let's switch Garrison talk about reading

0:55

and writing how do you select what you

0:57

read I heard this idea I think it was

0:59

from Patrick oan is years ago who said

1:01

you want a wide funnel and a tight

1:03

filter you're one of the best

1:05

storytellers of Our Generation teach me

1:07

how to tell a story like Morgan hosel I

1:10

think it's two things one

1:16

[Music]

1:20

is I want to start with a bit of a

1:23

paradox the less money we seem to have

1:26

the more risks we're willing to take can

1:28

you explain that to me Daniel Conan uh

1:32

said something along the lines of when

1:33

all your options are bad your

1:36

willingness to take a risk explodes

1:38

because you got nothing else to lose and

1:40

I think you see this in a lot of areas

1:42

in life one that I see it all the time

1:45

in that is a a big news story in the

1:46

United States I don't know if it's the

1:48

same in Canada but in America we spend

1:50

something like a hundred billion dollars

1:51

a year on lottery

1:53

tickets hundred billion it's massive

1:55

that people spend on lottery tickets and

1:57

if you dig into who's buying it it's

2:00

almost exclusively poor people they buy

2:02

the vast majority of lottery tickets and

2:04

the poorer you are the more lottery

2:07

tickets you buy and these are some

2:09

people for whom they literally can't buy

2:11

food or they might be homeless and when

2:14

whatever little money they have they go

2:16

into a 7-Eleven and buy some scratcher

2:18

tickets and you might look at that and

2:20

say like you you idiots like what are

2:21

you doing you this is the dumbest idea

2:24

I've ever seen and and maybe that's the

2:25

right answer like maybe you could just

2:27

stopped there but in Conan's framework I

2:30

think it starts to make a little bit

2:31

more sense if you have someone in a

2:33

situation like this who in their mind at

2:36

least they think I can't get a raise I

2:39

can't build a career I can't get

2:40

promoted I'm kind of stuck in minimum

2:43

wage job if that's their mindset then

2:45

buying a lottery ticket might be the

2:48

only time in their life where they can

2:50

say to themselves and believe like this

2:53

is my literally ticket out of here this

2:55

is the only chance that I have to get

2:57

ahead and so it starts to make a little

2:59

bit more sense in that situation and

3:01

maybe you contrast that with someone who

3:03

has a very high net worth they might be

3:06

like look I can just put all my money in

3:07

treasuries and just live for the rest of

3:09

my life just off the interest and when

3:11

you have so much you don't need to take

3:13

the risk well it comes down to

3:14

perspective right so like if I could see

3:16

what you see and feel what you feel that

3:18

decision would be rational yeah there's

3:20

so many things in life where you can

3:22

look at other people and the decisions

3:24

they make not just in money but for

3:26

politics their health decisions whatever

3:27

it might be and fierce disagree with it

3:31

but what's easy to overlook is that if I

3:32

were in your shoes and had experienced

3:34

what you had had the same family Dynamic

3:37

that you do the same DNA that you do I

3:39

would do the exact same thing and I

3:41

think that is a more qu important

3:43

question to ask yourself like what

3:45

financial decisions would I make

3:47

differently if I were born in a

3:49

different era born to different parents

3:51

born in a different country and I think

3:53

you can't answer that question honestly

3:55

because you don't know but you know

3:56

there would be a lot of things different

3:59

that are complet outside of your control

4:00

where and when you were born would have

4:02

a massive impact you and I should not

4:04

pretend that if we were born in the

4:06

1960s in Nigeria that we would have the

4:09

same views about investing in the stock

4:11

market over time that you and I do today

4:13

this kind of gets to the topic of luck

4:15

and a lot of people when you bring up

4:16

luck they will say something that sounds

4:18

smart that I I fiercely disagree with

4:20

they say like oh you should increase the

4:23

surface area of your luck you should

4:25

like oh the harder I work the luckier I

4:26

get like some variation of that I'm like

4:28

no if you can can do something that

4:30

changes your odds of an outcome it's not

4:32

luck by definition luck to me the

4:35

biggest are where and when you were born

4:37

you can't control it Bill Gates couldn't

4:39

control it Elon Musk couldn't control it

4:41

but it has a massive income a massive

4:43

impact on where you're going to go in

4:45

life that to me is what luck is it's

4:47

what you truly have absolutely no

4:48

control over and then there's also the

4:51

the not only the country you're born

4:53

into but the socioeconomic household

4:55

you're born into the schools that you go

4:57

to how how much of this is nature versus

5:00

nurture versus chosen nurture the stat

5:03

that I I think is so astounding is that

5:05

income among Brothers is more correlated

5:09

than height or weight so basically that

5:11

means if you have a brother who is Rich

5:13

and tall you are more likely to also be

5:16

rich than you are tall it's more

5:18

correlated than the literal DNA that

5:20

you're that you're that you're sharing

5:21

with each other look is it is it a

5:23

perfect correlation no are there is it

5:24

possible to be raised by a poor family

5:26

and become rich of course is it possible

5:28

to be raised by a Rich family and and

5:30

end up in the streets of course but

5:32

there's a very strong correlation

5:34

between those two I think people get

5:35

really uh can get kind of testy when you

5:39

talk about luck because if I say that

5:41

you got lucky I look jealous and if I

5:45

say that I got lucky uh I feel

5:48

diminished in in what I'm doing in life

5:50

so it plays a massive role but it's very

5:52

easy to ignore the impact that it has in

5:55

the world how do we break down that

5:56

contribution between luck and skill or

6:00

what's repeatable on our part rather

6:01

than saying what is luck I think it's

6:04

important to just say like what is

6:05

repeatable what is something that

6:07

happened that I could do again and if we

6:09

look at Buffett this guy standing behind

6:11

our shoulder here and and let's let's

6:13

look at the course of his life I cannot

6:16

he cannot recreate the trading

6:18

conditions that existed in the 1950s

6:21

that allowed him to buy Blue Chip stocks

6:23

at three times earnings whatever it was

6:25

back then that he was doing he can't

6:26

recreate that he couldn't do it again

6:28

but could I or you or anyone else

6:31

listening try to recreate his patience

6:34

his some of his risk framework like yes

6:36

so that's something we should pay

6:37

attention to you want to find what is

6:39

repeatable and what you could do again

6:42

and those are the things you should just

6:43

pay the most attention to I think that's

6:45

fascinating right because when we look

6:46

at Buffett what we want is the outcome

6:49

and what we don't think about is all the

6:51

things that go into creating that

6:52

outcome so what stays the same between

6:54

all these different decades where he's

6:56

done this right so he's done it from

6:58

buying netet Ben Graham stocks all the

7:01

way to buying great businesses all the

7:03

way to the patience to do nothing and

7:06

then once every 10 years deploy a whole

7:08

bunch of cash yeah what is consistent

7:10

across that period in your mind two of

7:12

the big ones we could come up with

7:13

dozens of things that are consistent

7:15

with someone like Buffett but the two

7:16

big ones are endurance and maybe tied to

7:19

that capping a downside risk that allows

7:22

him to stick around for longer than

7:23

anyone else there's also a psychological

7:25

trait of wanting to keep going longer

7:27

than anyone else um I I I use a stat in

7:30

in my book that 99% of Buffett's net

7:33

worth was accumulated after his 60th

7:35

birthday like the vast majority of

7:37

people including me and maybe you if we

7:40

became a billionaire at age 60 would be

7:42

done you move to Florida and buy a

7:44

private island and like live happily

7:46

ever after for him to be that successful

7:48

and to keep going full blast for what's

7:51

now another 33 years and still going

7:53

stronger than ever is a very unique

7:56

characteristic that plays a massive role

7:58

in his success if Buffett had retired at

8:00

age 60 or 50 like a normal person would

8:03

have in that situation you would have

8:05

never heard of him the whole reason he's

8:06

so successful is just the endurance and

8:09

there's a again there's a psychological

8:11

and a financial component to that never

8:13

getting wiped out financially and the

8:15

psychology that will allow him to keep

8:17

going full blast for nearly a century on

8:20

end now but that sounds academically

8:24

correct but in temperament incredibly

8:27

difficult because I see my friends

8:29

getting rich off like Bitcoin or

8:31

something and that makes me want to

8:34

change the patience that I have I know

8:37

how to get wealthy over time we know

8:39

historically that what's worked is

8:41

saving money being very patient letting

8:44

it compound decade after decade then all

8:47

of a sudden you wake up with a a ton of

8:49

money and financial

8:51

Independence but if I see my neighbor

8:54

getting richer quicker than I am it

8:56

makes me want to accelerate that

8:58

timeline yeah and my lack of patience

9:00

sort of changes the outcome not having

9:03

fomo is the single most important

9:05

Financial skill I think it's so

9:07

important that you cannot ever imagine

9:08

accumulating significant wealth over

9:10

your lifetime if you are susceptible to

9:12

fomo like if there's literally one thing

9:15

like one trait that you want that's

9:17

going to allow you to accumulate wealth

9:18

it's the lack of fomo particularly in

9:20

modern markets that can get so crazy

9:22

with social media and Reddit and Twitter

9:24

and everything if you if you are

9:26

susceptible to fomo there's no hope for

9:28

you over time I I I I really don't think

9:30

that's an exaggeration and that being

9:32

able to see your neighbor get much

9:34

richer than you and not being being

9:37

impacted by it is is so incredibly

9:40

critical and easy to overlook these days

9:42

I don't have that many Financial skills

9:44

I could never be a stock picker I could

9:46

never be a Trader I don't have the

9:48

intellect or the the the horsepower to

9:51

pull that off but I feel like I've never

9:53

been at least that susceptible to fomo

9:56

it doesn't bother me in the slightest to

9:58

watch other people getting rich Brent

9:59

bore our our our mutual good friend had

10:01

a quote that I love he said I am

10:03

perfectly happy watching you get very

10:07

rich doing something that I would never

10:08

want to do and I think that's that's a

10:11

great way to frame it I don't get

10:12

jealous or or anxious to watch other

10:15

people get richer than I am over time my

10:17

investing strategy is to own index funds

10:21

for as long as I possibly can to be

10:23

average for an above average period of

10:25

time and I think that will actually lead

10:27

to an incredible outcome not only will

10:29

it achieve the financial goals that I

10:31

have for my family but I think over a

10:33

long period of time it will put you in

10:35

the top desile at least of people who

10:38

are who are compounding money over time

10:40

I think that's really hard to appreciate

10:42

that what's short-term optimal and

10:43

what's long-term optimal are often two

10:46

different things completely different

10:47

things Howard Marx talked about this

10:49

investor that he knew who in any given

10:51

year he was never in the top half versus

10:55

his peers he was never in the top 50% of

10:58

of other investors and over a 20-year

11:00

period he was in like the top 4% because

11:03

everyone else who was beating him in a

11:04

given year couldn't keep it going and so

11:07

like what's your ultimate goal so much

11:09

of investing is just Define the game

11:10

that you're playing and I don't look

11:12

down upon or criticize people who are

11:14

short-term Traders maybe like that's

11:17

their game and for their investors or

11:19

for their like it makes sense for them

11:21

my game is is different I think your

11:22

game is different most people's game

11:24

might be a little bit different and

11:25

what's important is that if your game is

11:28

to invest for the next 20 30 50 years

11:31

that you're not taking your cues from

11:33

people who are playing a different game

11:35

of trading for the next quarter and

11:37

that's where a lot of danger and

11:38

investing comes from you've changed my

11:41

Capital allocation strategy our

11:42

conversations our walks totally yeah how

11:45

how how so what what what did you used

11:47

to do that you don't anymore uh we used

11:49

to do a lot more private Investments and

11:51

now it's mostly index funds and as

11:54

things sort of roll in uh through

11:56

dividends or whatever it just gets

11:57

reinvested in index funds but it's our

12:00

conversations that change that well

12:01

great that makes me happy and nervous

12:03

that that I'm having influence one thing

12:05

that some people will say when you talk

12:06

about index funds is like what is the

12:08

guarantee that this is going to work for

12:09

the next 50 years okay I understand it

12:11

works in the past 50 years and my

12:14

response is always like nothing there's

12:15

no guarantee that this is going to work

12:17

it's very possible that it doesn't work

12:19

out for whatever reason and there have

12:21

been periods you know from the you know

12:23

the late 1920s to the 1950s where the

12:25

returns were terrible or even from 2000

12:28

to 2010 had basically 0% real returns in

12:31

index funds so it's not perfect in the

12:33

slightest nothing guarantees that it's

12:35

going to work or be satisfactory over

12:37

time but I think when you adjust it for

12:40

the effort that is put in the lack of

12:42

effort that's put in basically zero

12:44

effort to do this and you adjust it for

12:46

the fees which round to zero now when

12:49

you adjust for all those things it's a

12:51

very appealing way to invest over time

12:54

if I was to look at your balance sheet

12:55

what is your Capital allocation strategy

12:57

I'm trying to think what like the

12:59

percentage wise it's probably something

13:01

like 15 to 20% cash the house that I

13:04

live in and then the rest the rest index

13:08

funds and shares of Marquel where I'm on

13:09

the board of directors and that's it th

13:11

those are those are my only assets cash

13:13

house index funds Marquel stock that's

13:15

it which index FS uh Vanguard Total

13:17

stock market index Vanguard value fund

13:20

and a little bit of uh an international

13:23

fund why do index funds work so well two

13:25

reasons one is it's always going to be

13:27

the case that a very small number of

13:29

stocks account for the majority of

13:31

returns so recently it's been uh Fang

13:35

plus Nvidia if you didn't own those

13:37

stocks Fang plus Nvidia over the last

13:39

decade your odds of outperforming are

13:41

are very very low it's not zero but it's

13:44

incredibly hard if you didn't own those

13:46

few and even if you look at an index

13:48

fund that owns a thousand stocks let's

13:50

say you're going to get the majority of

13:52

returns from probably fewer than 20 of

13:54

them and it's always been like that it

13:56

back in the 90s it was uh it was AOL and

13:59

Cisco and Microsoft and Dell and those

14:01

kind of companies in a previous

14:03

generation it was General Electric and

14:05

Intel and those kind of companies it's

14:07

always the case that it's very taal

14:09

driven the distribution of returns and

14:11

owning the index just guarantees that

14:12

whatever is going to be the next driver

14:15

I own because it's extremely difficult

14:17

to know what those are going to be if

14:19

you had gone back to 200 uh 4 20 years

14:22

ago and tried to predict what are the

14:25

big Winners going to be over the next 20

14:27

years well by the some of those

14:29

companies didn't even exist yet Facebook

14:31

didn't even exist yet Google was still a

14:33

private company or maybe it had just

14:34

gone public in 2004 the big winners are

14:37

I think extremely difficult to know with

14:39

any foresight what it's going to be and

14:41

if you had suggested even three years

14:43

ago that Nvidia was going to be one of

14:45

them you would have been like what in

14:46

like they make like it would have

14:49

sounded absurd so you're guaranteeing

14:51

that you're going to own the oddballs

14:52

that account for the majority of the

14:54

returns over time the other is I think

14:56

the the lack of effort that goes into it

14:59

that is needed investing is one of the

15:01

very few Endeavors in life where the

15:04

harder you try the worse you're probably

15:05

going to do and yes there are exceptions

15:07

to that Renaissance Technologies of

15:09

course you you you can name the

15:11

exceptions for people who tried very

15:12

hard and did very well but for the vast

15:14

majority of people there's going to be a

15:16

negative correlation between the effort

15:18

you put into it and the results that you

15:20

got out of it and so the the leave it

15:23

alone aspect of of investing of in index

15:25

funds is very important one little stat

15:27

that I love about this is that if you

15:29

look at both the Dow and the S&P 500

15:31

those are not static indexes they change

15:33

over time there are new constituents

15:35

that are added companies go out of

15:37

business or they merge and then new and

15:38

then new companies are added to that if

15:41

you were to look at the Dow I think one

15:43

one one of the studies showed over the

15:45

last 100 years if rather than adding a

15:47

new company when one of the original

15:49

components uh went out of business or

15:51

merged if you just left it alone don't

15:53

add anything else don't take anything

15:55

out just literally take the original

15:57

components and leave them alone you

15:59

would have done better than the

16:01

companies that were added and removed

16:02

added and removed like any activity that

16:04

goes into it tends to be detrimental

16:06

over time that's I I I've always thought

16:08

is is is very fascinating it's literally

16:11

like there's very few exceptions in the

16:13

index world to where the more effort you

16:16

put into it the better you're going to

16:17

do over time do you think we find it

16:19

boring and that's why we don't want to

16:20

do it it's a combination of boredom and

16:23

just the

16:25

counterintuition of the less effort the

16:27

better we're going to do because any

16:29

Endeavor in life whether it's your

16:30

physical fitness or whatever it might be

16:33

there is a positive correlation if you

16:34

want to become in better shape you

16:36

exercise you put more effort into it in

16:38

most Endeavors in life the harder you

16:39

try the better you're going to do and

16:41

investing is just not one of those and

16:43

it's so not intuitive that people end up

16:45

tripping over themselves I would also

16:47

say too that I am not against active

16:49

investing in the slightest at all I have

16:51

so much respect and admiration for the

16:54

people who do it well and the stats that

16:56

get thrown around that are true that you

16:58

know 90% or more of mutual funds will

17:00

underperform The Benchmark my response

17:02

to that is always like of course that's

17:04

how it is you should not expect to live

17:06

in a world in which everyone who tries

17:08

to beat the market can do it of course

17:10

that's how it is and the people who can

17:12

do it are enormously talented and I have

17:14

so much respect for them two of them are

17:17

sitting behind our shoulders here and

17:19

other people I I know people you know

17:21

people who have been and I think will

17:24

continue to be successful uh at this so

17:27

I I'm not a passive zealot the slightest

17:29

I just think for myself and many other

17:31

people it's probably the smartest way to

17:33

invest how do you keep your goalpost

17:36

from moving as you accumulate and

17:38

compound wealth hey I I think everyone's

17:42

including my and my wife's have not stop

17:45

moving nor nor should they I I I don't

17:47

personally aspire to live in a world

17:49

where if I'm lucky enough for my net

17:51

worth to go up uh 100% of it just acrs

17:54

to savings overtime that's not the life

17:56

that I want to live I want to have a

17:58

great life with some great material

18:00

possessions and travel with my kids and

18:02

live and live well over time if your net

18:03

worth grows 10% but your expectations

18:06

grow 12% that's that's when you get into

18:08

trouble it's just the gap between the

18:09

two and so look I'm making this up this

18:11

is this is not an actual analysis but I

18:13

bet over time if my net worth has gone

18:15

up by 10% per year our goal post has

18:19

grown by 5% per year I'm making those

18:21

numbers up but it's something like that

18:22

so yes my family lives a better life

18:26

materially today than we did 10 years

18:28

ago but we've still saved and lots of

18:31

money during that period I think that's

18:32

all that matters over time is that you

18:34

you know and even uh Buffett and Munger

18:36

who are you know known for being FR

18:38

Buffet lives in the same house he bought

18:39

when he was 26 yes but he also flies a

18:41

private jet and had a beautiful beach

18:43

front house in lagona Beach these guys

18:44

are not living like poppers over time

18:47

and that that's what I think is really

18:48

important it's just making sure that

18:49

there's a gap between your net worth and

18:51

your expectations seems one of the

18:53

things that we inherit from society is

18:56

that the house you live in is your Prime

19:00

financial asset yeah that seems really

19:04

recent as well maybe the last 30 40

19:06

years where that's become the vast

19:09

majority of wealth for Americans and

19:13

Canadians I know in in in United States

19:15

real home prices uh for most of modern

19:19

history in the 20th century were flat as

19:21

a pancake Robert Schiller of Yale did

19:24

did a lot of analysis on this tracking

19:25

us home prices since the 1800s and in

19:29

real terms from probably the 1940s

19:32

through the 1990s were flat as a pancake

19:35

on average across the United States and

19:37

then in the last 20 years starting with

19:39

the housing bubble that started around

19:41

2003 they exploded higher and then of

19:43

course we had the housing crash in 2008

19:46

and people thought that was the end of

19:47

the bubble but then they've exploded

19:49

higher even more and real home prices in

19:52

the US I'm sure it's the same in Canada

19:54

are much higher today than they were at

19:56

the peak of the bubble in 2006 on

19:58

average of course there's many variables

20:00

going into that a lack of building of

20:02

new homes uh that didn't keep up with

20:04

generational growth and it makes it it

20:06

kind of bifurcates the world in terms of

20:10

if you ha if you have owned a home for

20:12

any period over the last 20 years you've

20:14

probably done very well and if you are

20:16

looking for your first home today it's

20:17

harder than it's ever been particularly

20:19

now that interest rates in the US are

20:21

seven or seven and a half% for 30-year

20:23

fixed rate mortgage combine that with

20:26

home prices that are just absurd

20:28

particularly in the in the Metro areas

20:30

that people want to live in it's

20:32

completely bifurcated because if you own

20:35

a house for the last 10 years you can

20:37

sell that house and take the equity that

20:40

has grown in that house to buy a new one

20:42

to use for your down payment on the

20:43

other house that's been infl whose price

20:45

has been inflated but if you're trying

20:46

to break in for the first time like it's

20:48

it's a joke it's a complete joke so

20:51

that's it's a it's a very difficult

20:53

thing I would not I have a lot of

20:55

Sympathy for the first-time home buyer

20:57

today who is just who does not have

20:59

parental support which is the vast

21:00

majority of them uh it's harder than

21:02

it's ever been and there are few things

21:05

that make you feel like you are stable

21:06

in your adult life than owning the house

21:08

that you live in and I think it plays a

21:10

huge role in a lot of things in life a

21:13

lot of people this would have been same

21:15

for my wife and I don't want to start

21:17

having kids until they own their home

21:19

they they they want to have that sense

21:20

of stability before they start having

21:22

kids so I think the lack of housing

21:24

affordability has an impact on

21:25

demographics and having kids over time

21:27

that will Echo the next 50 or 70 years

21:30

so it plays a huge role in in what's

21:32

going on in society there's also sort of

21:34

a difference between what's optimal

21:36

financially and what's optimal

21:38

psychologically and we've had this

21:40

conversation before where you you've

21:43

told me you paid off your mortgage yep

21:45

and that makes no very little Financial

21:48

sense because you you had one of those

21:50

crazy like really low mortgages like

21:52

orate was 3.2% fixed for 30 years and we

21:55

paid it off which I I say is it's very

21:57

true is the worst financial decision

21:59

we've ever made but it's the best money

22:02

decision we've ever made and the

22:04

difference between the two is like look

22:06

on a spreadsheet it's terrible I've done

22:07

the math of like what if I had just

22:09

invested that money instead how much

22:11

would I more money would we have today

22:12

it's a lot it's it's a lot of money but

22:16

nothing that we've ever done in our

22:17

financial life has I think given us more

22:20

happiness than paying that off and a lot

22:23

of that is unique maybe to my

22:24

personality this is not advice for other

22:26

people because maybe you and other

22:28

people don't have that personality I'm a

22:30

worst case scenario thinker uh I also

22:33

have a career that can be fickle and so

22:36

and and I'm the sole bread wetter in our

22:38

household my wife is is is is home with

22:40

our kids so with all of those my

22:42

personality my career and whatnot it

22:43

made perfect sense and when we did it I

22:45

was nearly in tears with joy when we did

22:48

it knowing full well that it was a dumb

22:51

that it was a dumb financial decision so

22:53

I think once you stop viewing money as

22:55

just trying to make the spreadsheet

22:57

happy and you view as a tool to live a

22:59

better

23:00

life a lot of things change and in that

23:03

situation it was a tool that improved my

23:06

the quality of my life and my family's

23:08

life I think dramatically even if it was

23:10

the dumbest thing that we've ever done

23:11

on a spreadsheet and a lot of people

23:13

when I when I say this they'll still

23:14

push back and be like well walk me

23:17

through like why it was why it was

23:18

rational like it's not rational it's not

23:20

rational at all I I I can't explain to

23:22

you on a spreadsheet it was it was dumb

23:24

to do but it made me really happy and

23:26

like is there any worth is there any to

23:29

that you know for you like it made me

23:31

happy we can just stop right there I

23:32

don't need to prove it anymore but

23:33

doesn't that make it rational if you're

23:35

playing a different game right like if

23:37

you're trying to optimize every penny

23:39

over the long term maybe that doesn't

23:41

make sense yeah but if you're optimizing

23:43

for happiness and Longevity maybe it

23:45

does make sense yes and so I think the

23:47

the qu the qualitative factors of money

23:51

are hard for people to wrap their head

23:52

around particularly in a field that has

23:54

been taught as an analytical field when

23:57

you if you get a degree in finance or

23:59

get your CFA or whatever it would be

24:01

it's purely numbers that's that's not

24:03

totally accurate there's some there's

24:04

some in there but vast majority of how

24:06

they teach Finance is just numbers and

24:09

so it can be hard for a lot of people to

24:10

wrap their head around why you would do

24:11

something where the numbers don't make

24:13

sense what can money do for us and what

24:15

can it do for us what's the LIE it tells

24:17

us what's the thing that we we feel like

24:19

it can do for us that it can't well I

24:21

think the the LIE is that a lot of

24:24

people in life if they're unsatisfied

24:26

with how their life is going it's a very

24:28

quick and easy answer to say if I had

24:30

more money things would be better and

24:32

that can be true it can solve a lot of

24:34

your problems but I think what a lot of

24:36

people want in life not everyone I don't

24:38

want to completely generalize this but

24:40

what I want that I think is is

24:42

reasonably uh common for people is I

24:45

want independence and I want to spend

24:47

time with the people who I love my

24:49

family and friends and that's pretty

24:50

much it and can you use money to do that

24:54

of course money is is kind of the oxygen

24:56

of Independence and if you can use your

24:58

Mone to spend more time with your

25:00

friends and family you and I went out to

25:01

a lovely dinner last night with each

25:03

other that cost money thank you for

25:04

buying by the way and we had a great

25:06

time with each other now if you and I

25:07

went for a walk that would have been

25:09

free it would have been great too but

25:10

using money for to spend time with whom

25:13

you want when you want for as long as

25:16

you want waking up every morning and

25:18

saying I can do whatever I want today

25:19

even if what I want to do is go to work

25:21

and and be productive is absolutely

25:23

critical and that is different from the

25:25

knee-jerk of just oh if I have more

25:26

money I can buy more things nicer things

25:29

but what you actually want in your soul

25:31

is to like is you want independence and

25:32

to spend time with people who who who

25:34

you love money can do those things but

25:36

it's not as direct as people as people

25:38

think one one example of this is like

25:40

will having a nicer house make you

25:43

happier it might but be the reason it's

25:46

going to make you happier is because it

25:47

makes it easier to have friends over

25:49

it's it's makes it more convenient to

25:51

hang out with your kids in a big nice

25:53

glorious living room so it's not that

25:55

the house will make you happier but the

25:56

house can make it more conducive to do

25:58

things in your life that those things

26:01

will make you happier I was reading Rich

26:03

Dad Poor Dad with my youngest and it we

26:06

come to the the concept of a house and

26:08

if I get this right it was sort of your

26:09

house is a liability and not an asset so

26:13

don't think of it as like a financial

26:14

asset that's going to grow and acquire

26:16

wealth for you think of it as liability

26:18

that's just a sort of table Stakes for

26:20

playing playing the game if you want or

26:23

living life and having stability and all

26:25

these other things and I thought it was

26:27

really interesting and as we talked

26:28

about it I was like you know it's just

26:30

the house what the house is effectively

26:32

it's a container and what matters is

26:35

what happens inside that container the

26:37

house in and of itself like who cares

26:40

yeah uh just recently just last month uh

26:43

I traveled with my son to the town that

26:45

I grew up in and I stopped by the house

26:48

that I grew up in for the majority of my

26:49

childhood I hadn't been there in 20

26:51

years we we pulled in the driveway of

26:52

course there's people who live there now

26:54

so we just sat in the car but I I sat

26:56

there for 10 minutes just kind of

26:58

reminiscing about as soon as you pull in

26:59

the drive all these memories start

27:01

flooding back of the things that happen

27:03

in that house good and bad fun and sad

27:06

like like so many memories in there from

27:08

my childhood and of course you can go on

27:10

Zillow and see what that house is worth

27:12

it'll give you a very specific dollar

27:14

figure for what the house is worth but

27:16

what the house is worth to me and my

27:18

parents and my siblings is complet is

27:21

invaluable and you can't put a price tag

27:23

on those kind of memories and I think

27:24

that's common for most people there's a

27:26

tangible Financial value there's this

27:28

intangible that you can't ever put a

27:30

price on that's true for vacations it's

27:32

true for a lot of things in life that

27:34

there's a financial value I if if I

27:36

asked you and said what is this house

27:38

worth again you could go on Zillow and

27:40

say but what are the memories built

27:43

inside that house worth it's like you

27:44

can't put a price on that when you've

27:46

reached Financial Independence is is

27:48

that the ultimate when you're spending

27:50

money but it's not a matter of the money

27:52

you're not quantifying it in sort of a

27:54

dollar figure you're quantifying it in a

27:56

feeling or I think there's to that it's

27:58

when you start using it as a tool to

28:00

become happier now what's going to make

28:02

people happy is very different having an

28:04

incredible Ferrari collection might make

28:05

you happy uh so if it's not to say that

28:09

the things will make you happy are not

28:10

material that you should just use us for

28:12

experiences that I think is a step too

28:13

far I think a lot of people have hobbies

28:16

that cost a lot of money that are

28:17

material that really make them happy so

28:19

it's like great it's there are a lot of

28:21

people out there who would say you know

28:23

who would really promote frugality and

28:25

be like you you don't need a big house

28:27

you don't need a nice car well big

28:29

houses and nice cars make some people

28:30

really happy other people they don't

28:32

it's whatever you can use money as a

28:34

tool for to give to live a better life

28:37

versus I think a yard stick of status

28:40

and success to compare yourself against

28:42

other people that's what gets dangerous

28:44

is when you're just using it as a

28:45

scorecard to compete with other people

28:48

how do we catch oursel in a status game

28:50

where we're playing a status game but we

28:51

don't we can't see it because we're in

28:53

it it's unavoidable at the economy level

28:55

especially at the broad macro level it

28:58

makes sense from an evolutionary

28:59

perspective that people compete with

29:01

each other there's limited resources and

29:03

like if I want if I want the food if I

29:05

want the mate whatever it would be I

29:07

need to compete with you that's always

29:08

what so it's so natural it's never going

29:10

to go away this is truly like same as

29:13

ever people are always going to be

29:14

keeping up with the Joneses and you can

29:16

imagine a world in which our kids and

29:17

our grandkids are living way better

29:20

lives than you and I are and living

29:22

longer and have better material uh

29:25

access you and I do and they're no

29:26

happier for it because they're just

29:28

competing with other people who have

29:29

even more than that that's always been

29:31

like that if people a hundred years ago

29:33

could see how you and I are living today

29:36

they would be completely dumbfounded

29:37

with virtually everything we have in our

29:40

life but I would also wager that you and

29:42

I are not that much happier than they

29:44

are there' be some aspects of life we're

29:46

healthier we don't have to wake up you

29:48

know worry that we're going to die die

29:49

from the flu next week kind of but um

29:52

people just adjust their expectations to

29:54

whoever is around them a lot of this is

29:56

like a a a DNA thing some people are

29:59

just way more susceptible to wanting to

30:02

keep up with others and other people

30:03

could just care less what other people

30:04

think about them there's probably uh six

30:07

people in my life who I'd really

30:09

desperately want their love and respect

30:12

my parents my wife my kids a handful of

30:14

friends and everyone else it's not that

30:16

I could care less But after those six or

30:19

maybe eight people it drops dramatically

30:22

and the vast majority of people on

30:23

Twitter and whatnot I could I could care

30:25

less what you think about the decisions

30:26

that I'm making so I think you define

30:28

that it's it's you know who's whose love

30:31

and admiration do I want in life

30:33

defining who those people are and what

30:35

do I have to do to earn their love and

30:38

respect the love and respect of my wife

30:40

and my kids and and my parents and

30:42

that's what I want to use money to do in

30:45

my life so like spending time with my

30:47

family taking them to cool places and

30:48

whatnot there is a financial aspect to

30:50

this but once you define that personal

30:52

game you're playing a lot of these

30:54

decisions clear up I think a lot of

30:55

people don't actually think about what

30:57

game they're playing they at people and

30:59

you know from My Lens you should be

31:01

doing something different but that

31:02

really comes CU we're optimizing for

31:04

different things yes I bet if you and I

31:06

sat down and like deeply compared our

31:08

lives there would be things that we do

31:09

very differently spending like you spend

31:11

a lot of money on this and I don't I

31:13

spend a lot of money on this and you

31:14

don't and it's not a disagreement it's

31:16

just we're different people even if you

31:18

are about you and I are about the same

31:19

age same education you know there's

31:22

probably a lot that is just like yeah

31:24

but we're we're different so I think

31:25

most Financial debates whether it's like

31:28

an investing debate or a saving or

31:29

spending debate people are not actually

31:31

disagreeing with each other they're not

31:33

actually debating it's people with

31:34

different personalities talking over

31:36

each other and once you come to terms

31:38

with that there's not one right answer

31:39

for any of this there's so many things

31:42

that we inherit though from our parents

31:43

like invisible rules about money or

31:46

practices around money I remember like

31:48

these moments in my childhood where you

31:51

know my parents had to decide between

31:53

fixing the roof and fixing the car and

31:55

they couldn't afford to do both and I

31:57

remember remember they you know they

31:59

worked for the military and the military

32:00

had sent them a financial adviser and I

32:04

remember listening to the conversation

32:05

they had with the financial adviser and

32:07

how out of the loop they were with what

32:10

was happening with my you know the the

32:13

severance pay that my mom was getting

32:15

and what was happening and they had no

32:17

knowledge of it and I was like I never

32:18

want to be in this position yeah what

32:21

are the lessons that you learned from

32:23

your parents that really stick with you

32:26

today that sort of Define how you think

32:28

about money the two things that stick

32:30

out for my parents my my parents

32:31

upbringing so my dad started

32:33

undergraduate college when he was 30 and

32:35

had three kids I'm the youngest of three

32:38

he started his undergrad uh when I was

32:40

like a month old something like that and

32:42

he became a doctor when I was in third

32:44

grade my Early Childhood my parents were

32:45

very very poor they were students and

32:47

maybe they had some like student grants

32:49

that allowed us to buy groceries and

32:51

live in a tiny little apartment we were

32:53

very happy had a great childhood but

32:55

they were very very poor and then my my

32:57

My dad became a doctor when I was in

32:59

third grade and had the so then it was

33:02

immediate shift towards very poor to

33:04

like upper middle class literally

33:06

overnight when I was in third grade and

33:08

my sibling my brother and sister were

33:10

teenagers at that point so I got to see

33:12

very like both sides of the spectrum and

33:14

I remember the year 1993 is the year

33:17

everything changed in our family what

33:19

sticks out from that is that the

33:21

frugality that was demanded of my

33:23

parents when they were poor stuck with

33:25

them after they started making more

33:28

money and so even after my dad became a

33:31

doctor they were we were very frugal we

33:33

lived a much better life than we did

33:34

when we were poor because we were we

33:35

were living in abject poverty for most

33:37

of my childhood and but but after that

33:39

it was they had a very high savings rate

33:41

we were not spending money like my dad's

33:43

uh co-workers were like you would expect

33:45

a normal doctor too it was nothing close

33:47

to that I think I looked down upon my

33:49

parents for that I was like we could be

33:50

living in a nicer house I know how much

33:52

money you make we could be living in a

33:53

better house and driving a better car

33:55

but we don't because you're cheap skates

33:57

that was my view for my teens and early

34:00

20s my dad was an ER doctor which is a

34:03

very stressful field it's literally

34:05

people dying in front of you in your

34:06

arms every day and working night shifts

34:08

and it's a very stressful field so after

34:11

about 20 years or so he had just had

34:13

enough and well before I think he

34:16

intended to retire he more or less woke

34:18

up one day and said I'm done it was a

34:20

little more planned than that but that

34:21

was that was that was close to it and

34:24

because he had saved so much he could do

34:25

that he had the independence to wake

34:27

wake up one day and say I'm going to do

34:29

like I'm proud of what I did but I'm

34:31

going to go do something else now and a

34:33

lot of his peers could not do that

34:36

because they spent like doctors they

34:38

lived in big houses and sent their kids

34:40

to private school and drove fancy cars

34:42

so when they wanted to quit they

34:43

couldn't they wanted to retire they were

34:46

they were tired and they wanted to quit

34:48

but they couldn't do it and that was

34:49

such a profound shift in my thinking

34:52

this was not that long ago I don't know

34:53

12 years ago or so of when I was like oh

34:56

that's that's why you were saving so

34:58

much it wasn't because you were cheap

34:59

skates it's because you were wanted to

35:01

become independent and now you are you

35:04

want to quit so you could quit that's

35:06

why you were saving that was a profound

35:08

shift for me of like you're not saving

35:10

because you're just scared to spend

35:12

you're saving because you want something

35:13

different which is independence and

35:16

Independence is going to give you so

35:18

much more pleasure than the big house

35:20

ever would that really stuck with me how

35:22

did they talk to you when you said hey

35:25

you're just being cheap skates like

35:27

let's do this thing or let's get this

35:29

bigger house or if they heard what I

35:32

just said they would say yes in

35:34

hindsight that's all true but we didn't

35:35

know we were saving for

35:37

Independence they also my my parents are

35:39

very interesting that they have dollar

35:40

cost averaged into Vanguard index funds

35:43

for more than 40 years and never sold

35:45

anything ever so they would be like

35:47

literally in the top probably 2% of

35:49

investors during that period without any

35:52

Financial education no Financial skill

35:54

like no no nothing like that so I think

35:56

a lot of the decisions they've made made

35:57

have worked out well but it hasn't

35:59

really been conscious so I think back

36:02

when I said your cheap skat I'm sure

36:03

they just kind of shrugged and you okay

36:06

well this is what we're doing but I

36:07

don't think they actually had a plan for

36:08

what they were doing it was just again

36:10

the frugality that was demanded of them

36:11

my parents also met on a hippie commun

36:13

in the

36:14

1970s uh not exactly the breeding ground

36:17

for like good saving skills and so for

36:21

their entire adult lives for literally

36:23

decades they were they they had they had

36:25

zero money they had absolutely nothing

36:27

so they learned how to be poor and

36:29

they're also very happy and have a great

36:31

marriage if you can learn how to be poor

36:33

with dignity that skill will just like

36:36

stick with you forever so when they

36:37

started making money I think I think

36:39

it's probably true that they didn't

36:40

exactly know what to do with it because

36:41

they were so used to be they were so

36:43

used to being poor but um whether it was

36:46

conscious or not it created this thing

36:48

that has given them so much happiness

36:50

and pleasure which is Independence

36:51

what's the difference between being rich

36:53

and being wealthy the definitions are

36:54

are my own so I'm just making this up

36:56

but I think rich is when you have enough

36:58

money to make your mortgage payment make

37:01

your car payment you can pay off your

37:02

credit card bill every month like you

37:04

can afford the things that you're buying

37:06

technically wealthy I think is when you

37:09

have a degree of Independence and

37:10

autonomy the weird thing here is that

37:12

wealth is the money that you don't spend

37:14

that's what wealth is like the homes you

37:16

didn't buy and the car you didn't buy

37:18

it's money that you saved and invested

37:20

that is going to give you

37:21

Independence and that's a hard thing for

37:23

people I think to wrap their head around

37:25

that wealth is what you don't see

37:26

because I can see your your house I can

37:29

see your car I can see your clothes but

37:32

I have no idea what your net worth is I

37:33

can't see your your brokerage account I

37:35

can't see your bank account so wealth is

37:37

always hidden and it throws a lot of

37:40

people for a loop because if if I was

37:42

looking for a role model of physical

37:45

fitness well I I can see your Fitness I

37:47

can see your weight and your muscle tone

37:49

what not it's it's all visible but when

37:51

you're looking for a financial role

37:53

model who do you look up to and a lot of

37:55

people particularly young people will

37:56

look up to the guy in the mansion with

37:58

the Ferrari but that guy for all you

38:00

know is living paycheck to paycheck a

38:02

lot of a lot of those people are and the

38:04

person who is actually wealthy and

38:05

independent might be the person in the

38:07

modest house driving the modest car that

38:09

you would actually want to be if you

38:11

want to be wealthy instead of just Rich

38:14

you want to be independent instead of

38:15

just making your monthly payments the

38:18

people that you actually want to look up

38:20

to are some of the hardest people to

38:21

identify in society who do you look up

38:23

to in general who I look up to are

38:25

people who do whatever they want and

38:27

people with Independence and there's a

38:30

huge range of that I think there are

38:31

people whose net worth is you know in

38:33

the low six figures who are independent

38:36

there's a guy Nam named Mr Money

38:37

Mustache who kind of started the fire

38:39

movement I don't know 10 or 15 years ago

38:42

and his story was when his net worth was

38:44

$600,000 not not that much money he

38:47

retired and lived a great life on it and

38:49

there's other people you know obviously

38:51

Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are independent

38:54

but I would I would venture that more

38:56

than half of Elon musda is doing things

38:59

that he doesn't want to do it's like

39:00

there's it's you know piling on all

39:02

these things that you know he's he's

39:04

still driven to do them and get them

39:05

done and of course he of course he could

39:07

quit tomorrow uh but doing things that

39:10

he doesn't necessarily want to do so

39:11

anyone who can wake up every day and say

39:14

like I can do whatever I want today if

39:15

you have Independence that that's my

39:18

personal goal so the people who have

39:19

that at any income level are the ones I

39:21

look up to why are so many people

39:24

who have money I think the the answer is

39:26

sort of maybe better than the last one

39:28

but why are so many people who actually

39:30

have a lot of objective wealth or money

39:33

if you will unhappy Andrew Wilkinson our

39:36

our friend had a saying where he says

39:38

like a lot of

39:40

people I'm paraphrasing him but a lot of

39:42

people who are very successful are just

39:44

walking anxiety disorders harnessed for

39:47

productivity and I think it was Patrick

39:50

oanes who said the single word that he

39:53

would use to describe a lot of very

39:54

successful people is not driven it's not

39:57

passionate it's tortured they wake up

40:00

every morning tortured about like I'm

40:02

trying to solve this problem I have to

40:03

get ahead I have to hit this goal and

40:06

they are literally it's they they wake

40:08

up very anxious and depressed and like

40:11

you know just tortured about about

40:12

achieving their things Elon Musk a

40:14

couple months ago gave an interview

40:15

where he said you might think you want

40:17

to be me yeah as in like the richest

40:20

person in the world richest person in

40:21

history but you don't and he was like I

40:24

think he said something like it's a it's

40:25

a tornado up here it's a mess inside of

40:28

this head you do not want to be inside

40:30

of this head I think that's really true

40:32

I think that's a profound truth that you

40:33

might think you want that kind of life

40:37

but there is a cost to that life and the

40:39

reason he's successful is because he's

40:42

probably woken up tortured for his

40:43

entire adult life trying to solve these

40:45

problems I am so glad and grateful that

40:48

people like himself exist because they

40:50

made the world a better place with new

40:52

technologies that we can all benefit

40:53

from but there's a big difference

40:55

between saying I'm glad you exist and I

40:57

would want your life those are two very

40:59

different things it's almost like we're

41:00

looking at the outcome we're like I want

41:02

the outcome I don't want I don't want

41:04

all the stuff it it we do this with

41:05

athletes too right like I want the gold

41:07

medal I don't want the 5 am. practices

41:10

seven days a week I don't want the I

41:12

think it was nval who said you can't

41:14

just pick and choose bits of someone's

41:17

life and say I want his physique and her

41:20

net worth and I want his house and like

41:23

you have to take the whole package and a

41:25

lot of the great things in anyone's life

41:28

there there there's a cost that came

41:29

with that whether it's their Career

41:31

Success that they had to put into it you

41:33

know there's stories that Bill Gates

41:35

worked I think it was 25 years without

41:37

ever taking a single day off and most of

41:39

the days he's working it would be like

41:41

he came home at midnight and crashed on

41:43

the couch for four hours and went back

41:44

to work I'm so grateful that he exists

41:47

but I would not want that for myself

41:49

that's not my definition of the life

41:51

that I would want our friend David senra

41:53

who runs the the podcast Founders has uh

41:56

profiled I think now proba

41:58

350 Founders over time and he says I

42:02

don't want to put two don't want to put

42:03

words in his mouth I'm pretty sure he

42:05

said the only founder that he has ever

42:08

read their biography and thought I want

42:11

his life is Ed Thorp and and everybody

42:14

else that he reads it I think he comes

42:16

to the same conclusion that I do I'm

42:18

glad they exist I would never want to

42:19

live their life because there's always a

42:21

hidden cost that when you dig into it

42:23

you're like yes he was very successful

42:25

because he sacrificed a million things

42:28

that would be very um that are very

42:31

important to you and I well let's talk

42:32

about that a little bit like you're

42:34

you're incredibly successful your books

42:36

have sold well over 5 million copies now

42:39

the inbound to you for requests of your

42:43

time your speaking your presence hop on

42:46

the phone for 15 minutes must be off the

42:48

charts how do you keep your surface area

42:52

small or keep doing the things that you

42:54

want to do well the only way to manage

42:56

that is to say no to virtually everyone

42:59

and that sucks for me for two reasons a

43:01

I don't have any assistant I'm

43:03

personally saying no to them I don't pwn

43:04

it off to anyone else and I don't like I

43:07

don't like making making people sad when

43:09

when you blow someone off or even

43:11

respectfully say no uh they're they're

43:13

going to be hurt a little bit I vividly

43:15

remember I'm not going to say who but

43:17

names that you and people would would

43:19

would know that I reached out to early

43:22

in my career and said hey I would can I

43:24

please pick your brain for 15 minutes

43:25

and they said no and I was hurt

43:27

I still remember it I still remember the

43:29

emails I remember reaching out to a

43:32

couple of authors probably 15 years ago

43:35

and saying my name is Morgan I'm an

43:37

aspiring author I'm trying to I'm trying

43:39

to do this I so admire you can I please

43:42

ask you you know just 10 minutes on the

43:43

phone and some of them didn't respond

43:45

and I still remember that so if if

43:48

anyone who remembers that gets in that

43:51

same position theirselves where they

43:52

have to say no to a lot lot of people it

43:54

sucks but there's no other way to to

43:55

handle it there's no other way to manage

43:56

it it seems like success and we've

43:59

talked about this before but success

44:00

sews the seeds of its own destruction

44:03

how do you think about that in what ways

44:04

does it do it the the biggest is just

44:06

that it allows you to become uh lazy and

44:09

it's going to degrade the thing that

44:11

made you great what made you what made

44:13

you like literally you um successful is

44:17

probably like some degree of like waking

44:18

up and feeling uh feeling feeling

44:21

inadequate just waking up and being like

44:23

I I know I'm capable of doing more than

44:24

I've achieved already and I got to go do

44:26

it and it's it's pretty common like

44:29

whether that was driven by um a lack of

44:32

uh self self-esteem like whatever it was

44:35

you're waking up you're like I need to

44:37

achieve more than I have today and once

44:38

you achieved some level it's easy to be

44:40

like well I've already done that and the

44:42

thing that made you successful that

44:44

drive you had is diminished you see this

44:46

in companies and in people and the other

44:48

thing that's really powerful is when you

44:51

are lower lower on the totem pole it's

44:53

very it's easier for everyone around you

44:56

to tell you what you're doing wrong

44:57

wrong and the higher you gain

44:59

particularly when you get up to the very

45:00

high levels no one wants to tell you

45:01

doing wrong because you're probably

45:02

paying those people to to be surrounded

45:06

uh you know to to surround you with

45:07

advice and they don't want to tell the

45:09

emperor he has no clothes that happens

45:11

to a lot lots of people lots of

45:13

companies and whatnot the thing that

45:14

made you great is degraded the more

45:17

successful that you become and some

45:19

people fight this very well but a lot of

45:22

people don't it's a it's a tough thing I

45:23

think the laziness aspect of it of once

45:26

you become more f independent you're not

45:28

driven for most of my career I was

45:30

writing because that was how I fed my

45:32

children I have I have to do this yes I

45:35

love it yes I enjoy it but I absolutely

45:37

have to do this once you get to a point

45:39

where it's like look I still love to do

45:41

this but I don't have to do it anymore

45:43

um is my motivation lower than it used

45:47

to I think the answer is yes like I I I

45:49

I don't like to admit that but I think

45:51

the answer is yes now I'm still as

45:53

motivated I'm still very motivated to

45:55

keep writing because I love doing it and

45:57

I think I there's a part of it that I

45:59

enjoy more now that I'm not doing it to

46:02

feed my children I'm doing it because I

46:04

just love because I love the the the art

46:07

of writing rather than just the business

46:08

of writing but people's motivations

46:11

change over time now part of that is is

46:13

great I don't want to be 60 years old

46:15

and having to work to to feed myself

46:17

this week but you shouldn't pretend that

46:18

it's going to not impact the thing that

46:21

made you great I want to come to writing

46:22

later on I got a lot of questions about

46:25

your process around that but before

46:26

before we get there what is risk you can

46:29

have a million different definitions of

46:30

risk I think broadly it's anything

46:32

that's going to prevent you from

46:35

achieving the goals that you want that's

46:36

a a very basic answer but I think that's

46:39

what it is and the reason that's

46:41

important is because take volatility in

46:43

the stock market is that risk well it

46:46

could be if you're a day trader then yes

46:48

if the market goes down tomorrow that's

46:49

a risk for you if you're in if you're

46:51

going to retire in 50 years it's not

46:53

whatsoever so just defining it in

46:55

personal terms

46:57

is I think the most important but a lot

46:59

of Finance is not that they Define risk

47:01

as volatility whatever it might be

47:04

recessions all these different things

47:06

but it's a very personal answer what is

47:08

risky for me might not be for you and

47:11

vice versa and this is what gets back to

47:13

most Financial debates are people with

47:14

different time Horizons talking over

47:16

each other there's a quote I love that

47:18

is personal finance is more personal

47:19

than it is finance that is really

47:22

important for everyone you and I should

47:24

not pretend that risk for Renaissance

47:26

Technologies is going to be the same for

47:27

you and I within our personal households

47:29

like complet completely and utterly

47:31

different so anything that pulls you

47:33

away from whatever goals you personally

47:34

have is what what I would Define as risk

47:36

if you had to break down the skill

47:38

differences between accumulating money

47:41

keeping money and spending money how

47:44

would you do that I've often defined it

47:46

as like getting rich and staying Rich

47:48

are completely different skills and

47:50

there's not that many people who are

47:52

equally skilled in getting rich versus

47:54

staying Rich there's you know a sliver

47:56

Society that's very good at getting rich

47:58

that has no ability to stay rich and

48:01

there's some people who are very good at

48:02

holding on to money but much less

48:05

talented at at building it and growing

48:06

it over time when you have both skills

48:08

combined it's it's a very special thing

48:10

Buffett is obviously that Bill Gates is

48:12

that there's a handful of people who are

48:14

extremely good at getting rich and have

48:15

stayed Rich very well the example that I

48:18

always use is Bill Gates when he started

48:20

Microsoft took the most audacious

48:23

entrepreneurial swing that maybe

48:25

anyone's ever taken of saying every desk

48:27

in the world needs a computer on this

48:29

and he's saying this in 1974 whatever it

48:31

was crazy amount of risk crazy bold

48:35

Vision at the same time he said that he

48:38

always wanted Microsoft to have enough

48:40

cash in the bank to make payroll for one

48:43

year with no Revenue which is the most

48:46

conservative pessimistic way to run a

48:48

business so he's like very risk-taking

48:52

and very conservative paranoid at the

48:54

same time very good at getting rich very

48:57

good at staying Rich at the same time

48:58

it's very unique to have both of those

49:00

acting at the same time and I think at

49:02

at the individual level you can have it

49:04

too my my net worth you'd say is like is

49:07

very barbell like a lot of cash that's

49:09

the paranoid conservative side and

49:11

stocks that I hope to own hold for 50

49:14

years that's like incredibly audacious

49:16

that that this is actually going to work

49:18

out over the next half century and I I

49:20

don't think that's that's any

49:21

contradiction it's just trying to get

49:23

both of the skills of getting rich and

49:25

staying Rich work at the same time

49:27

speaking of staying Rich one of the

49:29

stories we talked about last night was

49:30

the Vanderbilts and how they basically

49:33

blew $400 billion Fortune what happened

49:37

if you look at all of the Rober Baron

49:39

very wealthy families the carnegies the

49:42

JP Morgans the Fords The Rockefellers

49:45

the Vanderbilts I think virtually all of

49:48

them did well or did a decent job at

49:51

managing that dynastic money except the

49:53

Vanderbilts the Vanderbilts completely

49:55

and utterly botched it um the stat is

49:57

you know when Cornelius Vanderbilt died

49:59

his net worth adjusted for inflation uh

50:02

because he died in the 1800s was the

50:04

equivalent of $400 billion and in three

50:06

generations there was nothing left which

50:08

is an astounding thing to think about

50:10

and in between there sat three

50:12

generations who just blew money in the

50:15

dumbest ways you can imagine and the the

50:17

reason you could say it was dumb is

50:18

because I don't think any of them were

50:20

happy I think they were pretty much all

50:22

miserable if you dig into the

50:23

biographies of these three generations a

50:25

lot of the other

50:27

Rober Baron families taught their

50:29

children taught their heirs to run the

50:31

business or to become good

50:33

philanthropists whatever it was the

50:35

Vanderbilts effectively told their heirs

50:37

your job your sole purpose on this on

50:41

this planet is to spend more money than

50:44

anyone else and to and and so they did

50:46

it they built the biggest houses that

50:48

were so big they didn't even want to

50:49

live in them because they were too big

50:51

they threw parties that were so

50:52

extravagant they were just burdens on

50:54

themselves it's they they were used like

50:56

their sole Financial metric is can you

50:58

spend more money than the other

51:00

socialite and they were all miserable

51:02

for it and the the the story that a lot

51:04

of people know now is that the first

51:05

vendable air to not get any money when

51:08

all the money was exhausted the first

51:10

air where there was nothing left was

51:12

Anderson Cooper of CNN his mother was a

51:15

woman named Gloria Vanderbilt was she

51:17

she got kind of the last trust fund in

51:19

the family and Cooper is not only the

51:22

most successful Vanderbilt Heir in like

51:25

180 years he's probably happiest and

51:28

he's talked about this that money that

51:30

you are given that you inherit can be a

51:34

burden to your ambition a burden to your

51:36

identity of building a name for yourself

51:39

and he was kind of the first vanderbel

51:41

era who was like relieved of the burden

51:43

of having to carry on this thing of like

51:46

I'm a socialite I'm a vanderbel he's

51:47

just like I got to build my own name and

51:49

my own career and I'm sure because his

51:51

mother was Gloria Vanderbilt there were

51:52

doors open to him uh that would not be

51:54

open to anyone else but he pretty much

51:56

had to build it for himself for the

51:57

first time in 150 years do you believe

52:00

that money should be able to pass

52:03

between parents and kids well able sure

52:05

it's your decision but there are

52:07

obviously downsides and I'm sure I hope

52:10

it's a long time for now that I'll leave

52:12

my kids some money not a lot I love the

52:14

buffet quote where he says leave your

52:17

kids enough money so they can do

52:18

anything but not so much money that they

52:20

could do nothing and that I think is

52:23

really important I want to use whatever

52:25

money I've saved to give my kids the

52:27

best opportunity of building the life

52:29

that they that they want but not so much

52:32

money that they are forced to live the

52:34

life that I want for them I've met some

52:37

families who are who are very wealthy

52:40

and wealth becomes like a personality

52:42

burden of because I inherited this much

52:46

money my job is to just be an heir of my

52:50

grandfather and heir of my of of of my

52:53

parents rather than finding out who I am

52:55

and discovering who I am myself that's

52:57

true at like the very high levels but

52:59

you you don't want the wealth that you

53:01

pass your kids to burden them into a

53:03

lifestyle that they don't want for

53:05

themselves you just want to be like

53:06

here's enough money so that you can have

53:08

the leverage and the tools to find out

53:10

who you want to be and live the life

53:11

that you want but not so much that it's

53:13

going to burden you into like forcing

53:15

you into a direction that you don't want

53:16

to be it's almost like there's a a

53:18

geometric progression of surface area

53:21

here where the more houses you acquire

53:24

the more staff you need the more staff

53:25

you need the more man you have the more

53:27

managers you know as you I was talking

53:29

to Sam zel we were supposed to record a

53:31

podcast it never happened because he he

53:33

unfortunately passed away but when I was

53:35

talking to him he he just wanted two

53:37

houses right he didn't want 10 houses he

53:40

didn't want all of these things he like

53:42

I can just rent them I don't want the

53:43

hassle I don't want the burden that

53:45

comes with that do do you think that we

53:47

lose sight of that and then there's sort

53:50

of like a natural entropy to wealth

53:52

right like it starts to expand yeah and

53:54

you actually have to apply a lot of

53:56

energy to keep it small yeah it's

53:58

obviously not the case that the more

53:59

money you have the less happy you're

54:01

going to be that's obviously wrong but I

54:03

think if you have more money you can

54:04

have a more complicated life and

54:06

complication can lead to a lot of

54:08

unhappiness that's definitely true and I

54:11

think this is mostly true for people who

54:13

are like middle wealth if you're like

54:15

extreme upper wealth you can just hire

54:16

out every decision people can take care

54:18

of for you it's people who have enough

54:20

money to buy a second home but they have

54:22

to manage it themselves that's when

54:23

things get like really complicated in

54:25

your life many years ago I did this

54:27

Consulting session with a group of NBA

54:29

rookies they were they were some of them

54:32

were 19 20 years old and they're Mal

54:34

making millions and a lot of them grew

54:36

up in like inner city poverty they grew

54:38

up very very poor and when they are

54:40

teenagers they signed contracts for

54:42

millions of dollars it's like such a

54:44

stark uh movement for them and the

54:46

purpose of this conversation was to talk

54:49

about money to try to prevent the very

54:52

well-known path of athletes going

54:54

bankrupt a very significant percentage

54:57

of these people who make millions of

54:58

dollars are bankrupt by the time they're

54:59

30 so like how do we prevent that and

55:01

one of these athletes who was I think it

55:03

was 19 said something that I thought was

55:06

so profound and wise he said when you

55:10

grow up in inner city poverty and then

55:12

you make millions of dollars when you're

55:14

still young that's not just your money

55:17

that is Mom's money that is brother's

55:19

money that is cousins money that is

55:21

neighbor money you can't just tell

55:23

everyone back at home good luck to y'all

55:26

I got my money I'm going to go live in

55:28

the Mansion you stay in this level of

55:30

you can't do that and he said the reason

55:33

so many athletes go bankrupt is not

55:35

because they bought themselves a mansion

55:37

it's because they bought their fifth

55:39

cousin a house and they felt so much

55:41

pressure to do it that they had this

55:43

like social burden that came with the

55:46

money and I think at many different

55:48

levels that's an extreme example but at

55:50

a lot of levels there is social debt

55:53

that comes with money so if you that at

55:56

every level of net worth like if your

55:58

net worth Grows by $1 with that comes a

56:01

couple pennies maybe of like social debt

56:04

where you are like incentivized or like

56:07

pushed towards to increase your

56:09

lifestyle or to take care of other

56:11

people in ways that might be great but

56:12

might be a burden might be a debt that

56:14

comes with it and at some point I think

56:16

that social debt explodes I mean people

56:18

who are worth you know 50 or hundred

56:20

billion dollars obiously there's not

56:22

that many of them but their social debt

56:24

to use that money wisely to donate that

56:26

money money wisely is off the charts

56:28

it's enormous the pressure that they

56:30

have to use that money well to not end

56:33

up like the Vanderbilts to you know how

56:34

much pressure does uh Jeff Bezos and

56:37

Bill Gates have to donate their money

56:39

effectively and no matter what they do

56:41

no matter what causes they give to

56:43

people are going to say well that's not

56:44

a worthy cause this was more worthy than

56:46

that enormous amount of like invisible

56:48

social debt that comes with that talk to

56:50

me more about that like I love that

56:52

concept I don't want to talk about the

56:53

extremes where like Bezos musk and that

56:56

but the the social debt like almost like

56:58

you go to a wedding and you have to give

57:00

more because you have more is that or

57:02

you go out to if your friends know you

57:04

have money you go out to dinner you're

57:05

you're forced to pay kind of thing or

57:07

like oh I heard I heard this guy just

57:09

got a huge bonus last year let's see

57:11

what he gets me for Christmas kind of

57:12

thing that there's there's a lot of that

57:14

that comes with it and of course it's a

57:16

good problem to have it's you you should

57:18

not have sympathy for people who made so

57:19

much money that they now have social

57:20

debt like boohoo you know deal with it

57:23

but it's a real thing and a lot of it is

57:25

just the um incentive on yourself or

57:29

within your own family to be like oh we

57:30

have more money now we should I guess we

57:31

should buy more stuff it's like this

57:33

pressure to do something that you may or

57:35

may not actually want one one other like

57:38

like weird Oddball story that I thought

57:39

about here on the Amtrak train from

57:41

Washington DC to Boston is where it goes

57:44

um there is always a quiet car it's it's

57:47

one section of the train where you're

57:48

supposed to be completely quiet if you

57:50

want to get some work done or whatnot

57:52

and always what happens you go there for

57:54

peace and serenity but everyone on the

57:56

quiet car is so anxious and upset

58:00

because on the quiet car if someone so

58:02

much as Whispers or if your phone

58:05

accidentally goes off people lose their

58:07

minds because they have this expectation

58:09

that it's going to be completely quiet

58:11

and so the slightest little sound sets

58:13

them off and like the irony is you go

58:15

there for serenity but you're just so

58:17

angry while you're there because of

58:19

anyone's making any noise to drives you

58:20

crazy and it's this thing of just like

58:22

if your expectations

58:24

shift then the littlest thing can can

58:27

make you upset it's like when you go to

58:28

the quiet car yes it is quieter but you

58:30

also have this like sound debt that

58:32

comes with it you could say this

58:33

invisible sound debt that is a liability

58:35

now and I think it's so true with money

58:37

as well that the more money you gain the

58:40

more pressure you have to live a better

58:43

life that may or may not actually make

58:44

you happier Will Smith the actor said

58:46

that when he was poor and depressed he

58:49

could tell himself if only I had more

58:52

money all my problems would go away

58:53

right and then when he became rich and

58:55

he was still depressed he couldn't say

58:57

that anymore he was still depressed but

59:00

he was like I can't say that if I had

59:02

more money I would be happier because I

59:03

already have more money that I could

59:04

ever spend so he said what happened when

59:06

he became rich is it just removed the

59:08

hope that he had when he was poor he had

59:10

this hope like a I got to make more

59:11

money and then I'll be okay when he's

59:13

rich is like lost all the hope he's

59:15

still depressed like it's it's very

59:17

inspiring to think if I have more money

59:19

my problems will go away but then once

59:21

you have that money and you realize that

59:23

you still have just as many problems

59:24

maybe even more problems than you had

59:26

for that could be a tough thing for

59:27

people to wrap their heads around we

59:29

were talking about that a little bit

59:30

last night in the sense of people who

59:32

have money can't really talk about money

59:34

either because they have all the same

59:36

problems that everybody else has but

59:37

they don't feel like they can openly

59:40

Converse about it yeah because it's like

59:42

boohoo and and and and it's true like

59:45

they are boohoo problems there are much

59:47

bigger problems in the world if you are

59:48

you know have can't afford health

59:50

insurance you're homeless whatever they

59:51

are much much bigger problems but first

59:54

world problems are real problems in

59:55

people's head and you're right that

59:57

they're by and large can't talk about

59:58

them it's very interesting when you get

1:00:00

together a group of wealthy people into

1:00:03

a room where they can all start like in

1:00:05

that safety zone they can talk about

1:00:07

their problems and they all have the

1:00:08

same problems how do I not spoil my kids

1:00:10

how do I do this things that they can't

1:00:12

talk about with anyone else in their

1:00:13

life because it's because those those

1:00:15

problems are so different from the the

1:00:17

other like very real material Health

1:00:19

living problems but there are lots of

1:00:21

things that are very difficult to figure

1:00:23

out when you have a lot of money or even

1:00:24

just a modest amount of money

1:00:26

that you can't talk about even with some

1:00:27

of your closest friends yeah I I'm sure

1:00:29

you do have friends who have less money

1:00:32

than you and I do and you can talk about

1:00:34

with those friends you can talk about

1:00:35

anything else in life yeah problems with

1:00:37

your marriage problems with your health

1:00:39

whatever it might be and there's all

1:00:40

these other things that you're like I

1:00:42

can't talk about the things that are

1:00:43

actually giving me anxiety right now it

1:00:45

seems like the meta skill to think about

1:00:48

right now throughout this conversation

1:00:49

is how do we learn to manage our

1:00:51

expectations we this is maybe this is

1:00:53

how we started the podcast I don't want

1:00:54

my expectations to never remove I want

1:00:57

them to just grow a little bit slower

1:00:59

than my wealth over time I want it so

1:01:02

that in 50 years I hope that I'm living

1:01:05

a better material life to to some degree

1:01:08

I just want that level to not exceed my

1:01:11

net worth over time once your

1:01:12

aspirations exceed your the growth of

1:01:14

your wealth that's when people get they

1:01:16

take too much risk they go into debt

1:01:17

whatever it might be you've hung around

1:01:19

spent time with a lot of wealthy

1:01:21

families either giving talks or

1:01:23

individually the problems are the same

1:01:26

how do they deal with not raising

1:01:29

spoiled children how do they what have

1:01:31

you learned from that i' say most of

1:01:33

them how do they deal with not raising

1:01:34

spoiled children is uh they they don't

1:01:37

deal with it well it's a very hard thing

1:01:38

to do I had a conversation recently with

1:01:41

a guy who was um his father is a

1:01:43

billionaire and they they've lived like

1:01:46

billionaires his entire life he's he's

1:01:47

roughly our age and he's a very downto

1:01:49

Earth grounded polite guy and so I asked

1:01:53

him like how did you grow up with in

1:01:56

private jets and mansions and not not

1:01:58

become a spoiled little prick because

1:02:00

he's such a nice guy and he said despite

1:02:03

having that much money and living like a

1:02:05

billionaire his parents never taught him

1:02:09

never told him that because we have more

1:02:11

money we're better than anyone else and

1:02:13

they told him quite the opposite like

1:02:14

it's and he he said something I thought

1:02:16

was was really uh important he said the

1:02:18

reason that so many kids grow up spoiled

1:02:21

is because their parents are obsessed

1:02:22

with money that's why the parents are

1:02:24

rich is because they're obsessed with

1:02:25

money but it naturally grows into this

1:02:28

thing of like you are better than other

1:02:30

people if you have more money and if

1:02:32

people have less money than us then

1:02:33

we're not they they are not equal to us

1:02:37

and it it's so basic and almost cliche

1:02:40

but if you are very wealthy but you're

1:02:42

still teaching your kids good values

1:02:43

that will stick with them and the

1:02:45

opposite is true too if you raise your

1:02:47

kids even if you have a lower income but

1:02:49

you raise them with an obsession with

1:02:51

money to like that's the scorecard of

1:02:53

measuring other people is it's like well

1:02:55

what's your network what's your salary

1:02:56

that's what I'm going to measure You by

1:02:57

and rank you by that's when you get

1:03:00

spoiled little jerks as children how do

1:03:02

you in Gretchen and talk to your kids

1:03:03

about money well our kids are four and

1:03:05

eight so not not that much yet the other

1:03:07

thing that I've noticed I'm sure it's

1:03:09

the same for you and other people who

1:03:10

have multiple children is that my kids

1:03:13

could not be more different in their

1:03:15

personalities totally and of course

1:03:17

they're raised by the same parents they

1:03:18

shared they shared half their DNA like

1:03:20

it's the same house the same rules the

1:03:22

same upbringing and they're utterly

1:03:24

different people so you can't create one

1:03:27

philosophy one parenting Philosophy for

1:03:29

that the other thing is even if I know

1:03:31

my children today I don't know who

1:03:33

they're going to be when they're adults

1:03:35

does my daughter want to be a a partner

1:03:37

at Goldman Sachs does she want to work

1:03:38

for Green Peace does she want to be a

1:03:40

kindergarten teacher you have no idea

1:03:42

what they're going to do and the the

1:03:43

different you know rules are going to be

1:03:45

different for them I also think that

1:03:47

what's true is that the more you try to

1:03:50

tell your kids this is what you should

1:03:52

do the more they're going to rebel

1:03:54

against that particularly when they're

1:03:56

teenagers but the more that you can just

1:03:58

lead by example like a they are going to

1:04:01

pick up on it you don't need to sit your

1:04:03

kids down and say let me teach you about

1:04:05

money and in fact if you do that most

1:04:06

kids are going to yawn and and and and

1:04:09

say I'm not interested in this but they

1:04:11

are definitely paying attention to every

1:04:14

time you say we can't afford this

1:04:16

they're they're making a mental note of

1:04:18

it every time you say that's too

1:04:19

expensive every time you say I value

1:04:21

this I don't value that they're they're

1:04:23

forming a model in their head um that's

1:04:25

it's going to stick with them forever

1:04:27

and so I think just leading by example

1:04:28

with them is what we try to do rather

1:04:29

than trying to say this is what I want

1:04:31

to teach you these are the values I want

1:04:32

to instill back to my own parents I

1:04:35

don't think they ever sat me or my my

1:04:38

siblings down and said let me teach you

1:04:39

about money but I I learned profound

1:04:43

money lessons for them by just observing

1:04:45

when I was eight years old well let's

1:04:47

invert it uh well we can go from

1:04:50

parenting and then maybe to money

1:04:51

broader but like what lesson don't you

1:04:53

want your kids to learn about money what

1:04:55

be the worst thing that they could take

1:04:57

away from you about money don't think

1:05:00

that all poverty is due to laziness and

1:05:02

don't think that all wealth is due to

1:05:03

hard work it's not if you are just

1:05:05

ranking people by their net worth and

1:05:08

ranking their value by the net worth

1:05:10

that's that that's probably the most

1:05:11

dangerous thing you could do with money

1:05:12

it's the most profoundly wrong takea

1:05:15

away from money and yes a lot of wealthy

1:05:17

people earned it of course and a lot of

1:05:19

wealthy people or a lot of poor people

1:05:20

made some very bad decisions but once

1:05:22

you just use it as a yard stick to

1:05:24

measure people's value by you're making

1:05:27

a you're making a huge mistake there are

1:05:29

a lot of wealthy people who I cannot

1:05:31

stand and some of my best friends don't

1:05:33

make that much money and I think you you

1:05:36

can only have that in your life if you

1:05:39

divorce someone's salary and net worth

1:05:41

from their their personal worth in life

1:05:44

what else keep going I think what what's

1:05:46

interesting I don't know if this is a

1:05:47

lesson but what's interesting is that if

1:05:48

you want if you ask most parents what do

1:05:50

you want for your kids almost every

1:05:52

parent will say I just want them to be

1:05:53

happy I just want to raise happy kids

1:05:55

and then if you said do you want your

1:05:56

kids to be rich and successful be like

1:05:59

well sure but I just want them to be

1:06:00

happy I just I just want them to be

1:06:02

happy so I think figuring out how to use

1:06:04

money as a tool to make you happier

1:06:06

rather than just a tool to pile on to

1:06:08

become wealthier is is really important

1:06:10

that I would you know there are for sure

1:06:12

people who earn 30 grand per year that

1:06:14

are so much happier than people who earn

1:06:16

$3 million per year and understanding

1:06:19

that value of money I think is is is

1:06:21

really important like what what can

1:06:22

money do to make you happier because

1:06:24

there's no other purpose there's nothing

1:06:26

else that you should even think about

1:06:28

other than that what do you think is the

1:06:29

biggest risk to capitalism I think it's

1:06:32

always going to be the case it is

1:06:34

inevitable and it is actually ideal that

1:06:36

there is some level of inequality in in

1:06:39

the world it's it's not only it's not

1:06:41

only inevitable it's ideal the opposite

1:06:42

of that is is a nightmare but it's also

1:06:45

the the case that you do not want a

1:06:48

third of society waking up every morning

1:06:50

and saying this doesn't work for me this

1:06:51

system doesn't work for me so once you

1:06:54

get to some critical Lev I I maybe it's

1:06:56

not 30% whatever it is but if enough

1:06:59

people wake up in the morning and say

1:07:00

this sucks this system doesn't work then

1:07:03

it's going to reverse itself and there's

1:07:04

a very long history of that so the

1:07:07

balance of you want inequality you

1:07:09

because people's skills are inequal you

1:07:12

want you want that to be the case but

1:07:14

there is some barrier at which it starts

1:07:15

to reverse itself and it becomes a pitch

1:07:18

Fort pitch Forks in the streets kind of

1:07:21

scenario uh that that reverts now in the

1:07:23

history of the United States that's

1:07:24

happened several times

1:07:26

the 1920s and the Great Depression I

1:07:28

been thinking what we've dealt with in

1:07:30

the last couple years there's always a

1:07:31

pendulum between labor and capital

1:07:34

workers and investors and it kind of

1:07:35

swings back and forth of who's taking

1:07:37

the Lion Share of the spoils in this

1:07:41

this economy in the 1920s it was capital

1:07:44

from the 19 probably 50s to 7s it was

1:07:47

Labor uh and and since then it's been

1:07:50

capital and it kind of shifts back and

1:07:52

forth now just in the last three or four

1:07:54

years there's been a huge growth the

1:07:57

segment of society whose incomes have

1:07:59

grown the most tends to be the lower

1:08:01

incomes we're still kind of attached to

1:08:04

this Narrative of the rich get richer

1:08:05

and the poor get poorer but in the last

1:08:07

couple years it has kind of flipped

1:08:08

around at least to a degree that we

1:08:09

haven't seen in a very long time is that

1:08:11

the pendulum shifting towards another

1:08:13

you know 30-year Trend maybe I have no

1:08:16

idea but that pendulum is always there

1:08:18

to kind of keep itself in check and I

1:08:20

think if it gets too extreme you can get

1:08:23

very extreme outcomes we don't remember

1:08:25

this now but in the 1930s during the

1:08:29

Great Depression the words dictator and

1:08:33

authoritarian and even fascism were not

1:08:36

the dirty words that they are today a

1:08:38

lot of people during that era it was

1:08:41

very it was not uncommon for people to

1:08:43

say capitalism and even having a a big

1:08:48

democracy just doesn't work the Great

1:08:50

Depression in their minds proved that it

1:08:51

didn't work and people's push to say hey

1:08:55

look at all these countries in Europe

1:08:56

that are going towards fascism maybe we

1:08:58

should try that cuz this didn't work I

1:09:00

think that's the danger when you get too

1:09:02

inequal in society is that too many

1:09:04

other people can be tempted to saying

1:09:06

that didn't work let's try something

1:09:07

even more extreme it's almost like I

1:09:09

feel like I don't have opportunity and

1:09:11

the minute I I feel like I don't have

1:09:14

opportunity and it's almost like we want

1:09:16

equal opportunity and we're okay with

1:09:18

unequal outcomes yeah it's a it's it's

1:09:22

it's a really tough thing and I would

1:09:23

not you I think you and I if we felt

1:09:25

that we were trapped that there's no way

1:09:28

no matter how hard we work if we felt

1:09:30

whether it's true or not that we were

1:09:32

trapped in a low-income job you and I

1:09:34

would be prone to some extreme views too

1:09:37

oh totally there's a saying I that I

1:09:39

love that um it was from a Russian poet

1:09:41

who spent a lot of time in the goolag

1:09:44

and he says um man becomes a beast in

1:09:47

two weeks if you have two weeks of

1:09:49

deprivation two weeks without without

1:09:51

food two weeks in solitary confinement a

1:09:54

refined kind polite person becomes an

1:09:56

animal so like if if if you put someone

1:09:59

in an extreme scenario they're going to

1:10:01

be prone to extreme views extreme

1:10:03

outcomes do you think most adults

1:10:05

understand compounding I think it's not

1:10:07

intuitive to virtually anyone Michael

1:10:09

batnick good friend of mine has a saying

1:10:12

that's so simple but I think sums this

1:10:13

up the best he said if I asked you what

1:10:16

is 8 plus 8 plus 8 plus 8 you could

1:10:19

figure that in your head five seconds if

1:10:21

I said what is8 time 8 time 8 time 8

1:10:24

time 8 even if you're a math genius

1:10:26

you're like I don't know it's such a

1:10:29

huge number like I I have no idea what

1:10:31

it is basic linear math is very

1:10:34

intuitive very easy compounding math is

1:10:35

just it's so it's so unintuitive for

1:10:38

even people who understand it and it's

1:10:40

everywhere compounding is not just in

1:10:42

your bank account your brokerage account

1:10:43

there's compounding in nature there's

1:10:45

compounding for social trends and it's

1:10:47

easy to underestimate how big something

1:10:49

can become because compounding is so

1:10:52

counterintuitive you see this with Co

1:10:54

which was compound interest at its at

1:10:56

its prime like this virus that in the

1:10:58

early days is you know doubling every

1:11:00

day whatever it would be and that's how

1:11:02

you go from oh three people are infected

1:11:05

in March of 2020 to today like I I don't

1:11:07

know anyone who's not had covid that's

1:11:09

how it goes from literally three people

1:11:10

to the entire world in the blink of an

1:11:12

eye when it's doubling that quickly how

1:11:15

would you explain it to kids or adults

1:11:17

like what is the best way to teach

1:11:19

people the power of compounding it's

1:11:21

like the one formula I I tell my kids

1:11:23

this when they're in math and they're

1:11:25

learning this in sort of grade eight

1:11:27

grade nine they learn about compounding

1:11:29

and I'm like your teacher's never going

1:11:30

to tell you this but this is the most

1:11:32

important formula you're probably going

1:11:34

to learn in your math class yeah I don't

1:11:36

know if I don't know I'm I'm making this

1:11:38

up right now I've not thought about this

1:11:39

I don't know how I explain it but just

1:11:41

growth fuels more growth it's like the

1:11:44

the more you grow the more fuel you have

1:11:46

for more growth that's that's that's not

1:11:48

a very good explanation for it but

1:11:49

that's that's the thing to wrap your

1:11:50

head around is like it's uh it's not

1:11:53

what you start with it's just like how

1:11:55

long you're doing it for and it's not

1:11:57

even the growth it's the duration that

1:11:59

matters yes so I I said this earlier how

1:12:02

I think about my own investing

1:12:03

philosophy if I can be average for an

1:12:06

above average period of time that leads

1:12:08

to a way above average result it's not

1:12:12

it's it's not about like what are the

1:12:13

returns that I can earn this year if I

1:12:15

can earn 8% returns for 50 years the

1:12:17

results are ridiculous the results are

1:12:20

absurd and so maximizing the variable

1:12:22

that matters which is time and endurance

1:12:25

you know all compounding is effectively

1:12:26

is returns to the power of time and so

1:12:29

if you understand math that the exponent

1:12:31

there is what's doing all the heavy

1:12:33

lifting like maximize for that but where

1:12:36

is all of the effort in the investing

1:12:38

industry it's in the the smaller number

1:12:40

it's in returns how do I increase my

1:12:41

returns this year but I think when you

1:12:44

understand like no all the power all the

1:12:46

wealth all the Leverage is in the

1:12:47

endurance just focus on that before you

1:12:50

think about anything else that's a

1:12:51

really powerful way to think about it

1:12:53

let's switch gears and talk about

1:12:54

reading and writing how do you select

1:12:57

what you read I heard this idea I think

1:12:59

it was from Patrick oanes many years ago

1:13:00

who said you want a wide funnel and a

1:13:03

tight filter I will start reading any

1:13:07

book on any topic that looks even mildly

1:13:10

interesting to me but I will slam it

1:13:12

shut without mercy and move on to

1:13:15

something else if it's not working for

1:13:16

me a lot of the reason that people don't

1:13:18

like read why why people don't read as

1:13:19

much as they should or if they say ah

1:13:22

I'm I'm not a big reader a lot of the

1:13:23

reason is because they feel feel like

1:13:25

morally that they need to finish every

1:13:27

book that they start and we realize that

1:13:29

the majority of there's 4 million books

1:13:31

for sale on Amazon I I I bet 3.9 million

1:13:35

of those are not meant for you or for me

1:13:37

they they're meant for other people but

1:13:39

they're not they just don't work for

1:13:40

what what we want out of them and if you

1:13:43

force yourself to finish every book your

1:13:44

start of course it's going to be a

1:13:45

miserable experience but when you when

1:13:48

you are willing to try anything but have

1:13:51

a a a filter that is that just has no

1:13:54

mercy to to move on if you don't like it

1:13:57

that's when you find the great books

1:13:58

because if you only stick to books that

1:14:00

you know you're going to like about

1:14:01

topics that you're interested you are

1:14:03

missing so many other topics out there

1:14:06

that you don't even know that you would

1:14:07

like you have to try a million different

1:14:09

things but then cut it off very quickly

1:14:11

if you don't like it so that's how I try

1:14:13

to read if it's even slightly

1:14:15

interesting if someone has said oh this

1:14:17

is a good I I will start reading it by

1:14:19

the way Kindle samples are free you have

1:14:21

no excuse to not try any book um and and

1:14:25

then just mercilessly cut it off if it's

1:14:27

not working for you I find this really

1:14:28

interesting because uh with my oldest

1:14:30

who who reads a ton uh I just put books

1:14:33

on his nightst and you know some of them

1:14:36

I think he'll like some of them I don't

1:14:37

think he'll like and he randomly he'll

1:14:39

pick them up and he read like an immune

1:14:41

system textbook last year yeah and loved

1:14:43

it yes I think there's a lot of like

1:14:45

that if you ask me right now would I

1:14:47

like to read a book on the immune system

1:14:49

I I I don't know not not really but

1:14:51

there are so many topics like that over

1:14:52

the years that I never would have

1:14:54

thought that I would would like that I

1:14:55

start reading I'm like this is

1:14:56

incredible or it's working for me in

1:14:59

that moment it's a missing puzzle piece

1:15:00

in that moment there are a couple books

1:15:03

that have always been on my go-to books

1:15:05

that I recommend to other people oh this

1:15:07

is one of my favorite books of all time

1:15:09

a couple of those books I went back and

1:15:11

reread and I'm like they're really not

1:15:13

that good but at the time that I read

1:15:16

them it was a missing puzzle piece that

1:15:18

it was like perfect for me in that

1:15:19

moment even if when I read it now I'm

1:15:21

like this book's kind of very basic not

1:15:24

that well written

1:15:25

and so I think that missing puzzle piece

1:15:27

is true for a lot of people and that's

1:15:29

why like you need to read a lot of books

1:15:30

because what other people think are good

1:15:33

may or may or may not be the book that

1:15:34

you need at that moment are you a Kindle

1:15:36

reader mostly I'd go back and forth I'm

1:15:39

in a Kindle kick right now um and I've

1:15:42

been in physical U books before what I

1:15:45

love about Kindle is so easy to

1:15:47

highlight and go back and search which

1:15:49

for me as a writer is really important

1:15:51

when I'm writing I'm like ah what was

1:15:52

that quote from this book I need to go

1:15:54

find that really hard to do that in a

1:15:56

physical book uh where's Kindle it's

1:15:58

just so easy do you take them out of the

1:15:59

Kindle or just leave the highlights on

1:16:01

the Kindle or I use the readwise app and

1:16:04

so everything that I highlight whether

1:16:06

it's in a blog post or in Twitter or it

1:16:08

goes all into that David senra is the

1:16:10

one who said his readwise feed of all of

1:16:13

his highlights is his Smart Twitter feed

1:16:16

Twitter can be filled with so much

1:16:17

garbage and noise but readwise you can

1:16:19

flick through I think David Sun said he

1:16:21

has like 28,000 highlights and he can

1:16:24

sit there and scroll it of these like

1:16:25

amazing quotes and anecdotes that he's

1:16:27

highlighted over the years are there

1:16:29

passages that that stick with you or

1:16:30

haunt you that you've read that you

1:16:32

can't stop thinking about it this might

1:16:34

seem a weird one but I just because I'm

1:16:35

a writer too as you are I'm a sucker for

1:16:37

just a well-crafted

1:16:39

phrase but there was one I I I forget

1:16:42

who wrote this I'm sorry I can't tell

1:16:44

you who wrote this but it was a book

1:16:45

about uh D-Day and it was talking about

1:16:49

this one uh this one group this one one

1:16:53

company of soldiers on D-Day of

1:16:55

uh many of them died and the passage was

1:16:59

all of them were prepared to die that

1:17:00

day and all of them did die that day and

1:17:04

that was something it's it's such a

1:17:05

beautifully crafted sentence and it's

1:17:07

also just Haunting in its own way that

1:17:09

I'm I'm I'm such a sucker for that it's

1:17:11

not like I always say the best story

1:17:13

wins you could phrase that fact that

1:17:16

they all died a million different ways

1:17:17

but how whoever the author was phrase

1:17:19

that always really stuck with me why do

1:17:21

you think the best story wins what

1:17:23

what's behind that what we're trying to

1:17:24

do when we read a lot of times is just

1:17:26

contextualize whatever fact or story

1:17:28

that was within our own lives and it's

1:17:30

much easier to contextualize a story

1:17:33

than a statistic because there's a human

1:17:34

element to a good story and I also it's

1:17:37

just so much easier to remember and

1:17:38

stick with you I don't remember any of

1:17:41

the formulas that I was forced to

1:17:43

memorize in school forced to memorize

1:17:45

the night before the test I don't

1:17:46

remember a single one but every good

1:17:48

story that I was told some of when I was

1:17:51

6 years old I still remember so because

1:17:53

it's just so much easier to remember a

1:17:55

story than a statistic and it's easier

1:17:57

to contextualize it within your own life

1:17:59

and because there's so much emotion

1:18:01

embedded in it stories are like Leverage

1:18:04

for good statistics if you just like

1:18:05

there's some statist like I just said if

1:18:08

if I

1:18:09

said uh first Splatoon of Company E all

1:18:12

died on D-Day that's a statistic but if

1:18:15

you phrase that if you put a name or a

1:18:17

face to it it becomes a completely

1:18:19

different thing I always use the example

1:18:21

of Ken Burns who makes the best

1:18:23

documentaries about us history and the

1:18:26

vast majority of what is in his

1:18:28

documentaries are already known the

1:18:30

documentary about the Civil War or World

1:18:32

War II You Know How It Ends you know

1:18:33

what happened there's not that much new

1:18:35

in there but he is a better Storyteller

1:18:38

than I think any historian has ever been

1:18:40

in history he can tell a story about the

1:18:43

Civil War that will literally bring you

1:18:45

to tears even if you know what happened

1:18:47

you knew what happened but when you hear

1:18:48

the story and see the face and hear the

1:18:50

music in the documentary it will

1:18:52

literally bring you to tears and Ken

1:18:54

Burns has talked about how important

1:18:56

music is in his documentaries the

1:18:58

background music and he said that he

1:19:00

will literally edit the script so that

1:19:03

when the narrator says a specific

1:19:05

emotional word it matches up with a beat

1:19:08

in the background music so that the

1:19:10

emotion and the music is literally

1:19:12

aligned like that no other historian's

1:19:14

doing that no other historian does that

1:19:16

and that's why he can create he has the

1:19:19

leverage by telling by talking about the

1:19:21

Civil War that no other of the of the

1:19:24

his torians who are who are writing

1:19:26

about the Civil War can recreate take a

1:19:28

few seconds and think about how you

1:19:31

would teach me to tell a better story

1:19:34

you're one of the best storytellers of

1:19:36

Our Generation teach me how to tell a

1:19:39

story like Morgan hosel I think it's two

1:19:42

things one is um write for an audience

1:19:46

of one which is yourself don't think

1:19:49

about other people don't think about

1:19:51

who's going to read this don't think

1:19:52

don't ask yourself how is the reader

1:19:54

going to interpret the sentence write a

1:19:56

sentence that moves you that makes you

1:19:59

when you read it you're like I I I like

1:20:01

that without thinking about anyone else

1:20:04

I think once you start thinking about

1:20:06

who is my audience and what are they

1:20:07

going to like you start to Pander and

1:20:10

you start to like perform for them in a

1:20:12

way that is very hard to like create a

1:20:15

good emotional story about just write

1:20:16

for yourself the other is don't forget

1:20:20

how

1:20:21

impatient everyone is so this is a sense

1:20:24

where Maybe are thinking about the

1:20:25

reader but everyone is so impatient when

1:20:28

they're reading that you just always

1:20:29

have to ask yourself what is the point

1:20:31

that I'm trying to make make that point

1:20:33

and get the hell out of people's way and

1:20:35

move on to another point and most

1:20:38

storytelling you lose it once you lose

1:20:41

the reader Mark Twain used to he said at

1:20:44

one point

1:20:45

that when he would edit his work he

1:20:48

would read it aloud to his family he'd

1:20:50

read the story aloud and when he saw

1:20:52

them getting bored he he would make a

1:20:55

not all right cut that part they're

1:20:56

clearly dozing off here and when he

1:20:58

would see their eyes bug up he'd be like

1:21:01

oh this is a good thing this is a good

1:21:02

part and I think Mark Twain was the one

1:21:04

who said leave out the parts that

1:21:07

readers tend to skip that's the key to

1:21:09

good writing leave out the parts people

1:21:10

tend to skip I think that's important to

1:21:12

keep in mind too is just write for

1:21:14

yourself in a way that you like and get

1:21:17

to the point and get out of people's way

1:21:19

after that how did you learn to write

1:21:21

you didn't even go to high school right

1:21:24

um when I was at the mle fool for 10

1:21:26

years that was a 10-e period where I was

1:21:28

sometimes writing three posts per day

1:21:30

three articles per day doing that every

1:21:33

day for almost a decade I wrote

1:21:34

thousands and thousands of blog posts

1:21:37

and when you write online people are

1:21:40

merciless about the feedback they give

1:21:42

you uh the the readers in the comment

1:21:45

sections are on Twitter will tell you in

1:21:47

no uncertain terms this article was

1:21:50

and you did a terrible job or they'll

1:21:52

say this was really good I really

1:21:53

enjoyed it so having that level of

1:21:56

constant feedback and doing that

1:21:58

thousands of times over a decade will

1:22:00

turn anyone into a a much better writer

1:22:02

than they were when they started so that

1:22:04

was that was really what it was for me

1:22:05

it's a combination of of quantity and

1:22:09

fierce unvarnished feedback from readers

1:22:12

do you test ideas I think in some ways

1:22:14

you test ideas in Twitter and if they

1:22:17

work you can turn those ideas into a

1:22:18

blog post and if the blog post worked

1:22:21

you can turn it into a book idea or book

1:22:23

chapter that's kind of the natural

1:22:25

progression for a lot of these things

1:22:27

and just like uh it's very true in

1:22:28

comedy too even the best comedians The

1:22:31

worldclass Comedians don't necessarily

1:22:33

know what's funny until they've tested

1:22:34

it and this is why George Carlin Chris

1:22:38

Rock Jerry Seinfeld they test their new

1:22:40

jokes in tiny clubs because even Chris

1:22:42

Rock does not know what's funny until

1:22:44

they've tested it till he's tested it

1:22:46

and I think it's true for uh writers as

1:22:49

well I've had a lot of experience with

1:22:51

I'll write a blog post and I'm like this

1:22:53

is good this is some of my best work and

1:22:56

it flops no one else likes it and and

1:22:59

the opposite is true too the biggest

1:23:01

most popular blog post I've ever written

1:23:03

were always ones where when I was

1:23:05

writing it I was like I don't I don't

1:23:07

think this is any good this is so

1:23:08

obvious it's so boring it's too personal

1:23:11

no one else is going to care about this

1:23:13

that does well so even after doing this

1:23:15

for so many years I don't know if my

1:23:18

ability to find a topic and say like oh

1:23:20

that's going to turn into a good post is

1:23:22

is really that good which is why you

1:23:23

kind of have to ideas over time it's so

1:23:26

interesting because podcasts are like

1:23:27

that too I'll record an episode and I'll

1:23:29

be like oh my God that was mindblowing

1:23:31

and then you know three months later

1:23:33

I'll check at the stats and I'll be like

1:23:34

what and then I'll record a podcast

1:23:36

where I'm like oh you know I wasn't that

1:23:37

engaged and I look at the stats and it's

1:23:39

like off the charts yes the most popular

1:23:42

blog post I've ever written by far by

1:23:45

like an order of magnitude was a post in

1:23:48

2017 that I wrote about I grew up with

1:23:50

and still have a a stutter and when I

1:23:53

was a child and teenager I could barely

1:23:55

speak it was a it was a very severe

1:23:57

stutter when I was a child and I

1:23:59

couldn't really overcome it to where I

1:24:01

can talk to you like it to now until I

1:24:02

was 30 years old and so I wrote a PO a

1:24:05

post about this trial uh it's called

1:24:08

overcoming your demons and it was the

1:24:10

most popular post I ever wrote when I

1:24:12

published it I literally hid it from our

1:24:14

blog feed because I was like no one's

1:24:15

going to be interested in this I was

1:24:17

literally hidden like the the link was

1:24:19

out there but it wasn't even on the feed

1:24:20

cuz I was like I'm so embarrassed about

1:24:22

this that I would just be writing about

1:24:24

a personal thing no one else cares about

1:24:26

this and I really felt that way and it

1:24:28

turned into the most popular thing I

1:24:29

ever wrote hard to tell do you think you

1:24:31

were scared to put it out there

1:24:33

combination of scared also the the point

1:24:36

of the post was overcoming your demons

1:24:38

that I started with this like profound

1:24:40

disability that had such a big impact on

1:24:43

my childhood and I overcame it and now I

1:24:46

speak on stage and do these kind of

1:24:47

podcasts and I felt like it was too look

1:24:50

at me look at me look at me I didn't I

1:24:52

didn't want that but I think everyone

1:24:55

has their demons you do I do everyone

1:24:58

has something where they're like I've

1:25:00

got this problem in my life and a lot of

1:25:02

those are hidden people don't talk about

1:25:04

them because they're embarrassed they

1:25:05

don't want to talk about it's too

1:25:06

personal and I think when you are

1:25:09

vulnerable and open people love it

1:25:11

because even if you don't stutter you're

1:25:13

like oh I I I have this similar I have

1:25:16

this issue whatever it would be and like

1:25:17

thank you for telling me that your life

1:25:19

was not as was is not perfect thank you

1:25:21

for being open about the struggles that

1:25:23

we all have in our Liv lives I think

1:25:24

people like that but it's a fine balance

1:25:26

between that and being too personal

1:25:28

which we've all seen online or being too

1:25:32

braggy egotistical about like look how

1:25:34

much I overcame I'm so important I'm so

1:25:36

special it's a hard it's a balance

1:25:38

between like some people use

1:25:40

vulnerability strategically yes you can

1:25:43

tell there was that Viral LinkedIn post

1:25:45

a year or two ago of it was a founder

1:25:48

and he said I just had to lay off half

1:25:49

my company and he included a picture of

1:25:51

him with like tears running down his

1:25:53

face and people are like

1:25:55

that's terrible you like shame on you

1:25:57

for just trying to like pull up the

1:25:58

heart strings and say like oh I'm I'm so

1:26:01

empathetic that I cry when I feel like

1:26:03

it's actually a hard balance between

1:26:05

like why why did my stuttering post work

1:26:08

but that picture was just universally

1:26:11

panned it's a it's a balance but I think

1:26:13

it's hard to know where you cross the

1:26:15

line there I want to come back to

1:26:16

comedians for a second what did they

1:26:18

know about telling stories that we

1:26:21

should learn from them I forget who says

1:26:23

this and this is not a direct quote I'm

1:26:25

paraphrasing it I'm going to do a much

1:26:27

poor job paraphrasing it but it's like

1:26:28

comedy is a way to show you're

1:26:31

smart without being arrogant something

1:26:34

like that that's not the quote I'm doing

1:26:35

such a bad job paraphrasing this but I I

1:26:38

I honestly think that the best comedians

1:26:40

are the some of the smartest people in

1:26:42

society they understand psychology

1:26:44

George Carlin understood

1:26:46

psychology I think better than Daniel

1:26:48

conman did that's a bold statement but I

1:26:50

think that is I think that is actually

1:26:51

true they are so smart at understanding

1:26:54

how the world Works what make what makes

1:26:56

people tick how people think but they're

1:27:00

doing it in a way where they don't want

1:27:01

to just impress you with their

1:27:02

intelligence they want to make you laugh

1:27:04

what could be better than that and so

1:27:07

I'll give you one example my favorite

1:27:08

George Carin line he says have you ever

1:27:10

noticed that everyone driving slower

1:27:12

than you as an idiot and everyone

1:27:14

driving faster than you as a

1:27:16

maniac a it's it's funny but be it's

1:27:18

like God that is if you think about it

1:27:20

that's profound and understand like how

1:27:22

like relative views of other people

1:27:24

whatnot and so they are I think they're

1:27:26

absolute Geniuses but they want to

1:27:27

deliver it in a way rather than using

1:27:29

big words to say like look how smart I

1:27:31

am they just want to make you laugh and

1:27:33

they are also because particularly for

1:27:35

like a young comic if they are not

1:27:38

making you laugh quickly they're going

1:27:40

to get booed off stage so they are the

1:27:42

epitome of one line or just like so

1:27:45

succinct in their delivery so succinct

1:27:47

in their writing because they don't have

1:27:49

the luxury that a lot of authors do of

1:27:51

like let me write a 7,000 word chapter

1:27:55

a comedian on stage is like if you don't

1:27:56

make me laugh every 10 seconds you're

1:27:58

going to get booed off it's interesting

1:27:59

because you mentioned psychology there

1:28:01

they they're Keen observers of human

1:28:04

nature and psychology and all we've

1:28:06

talked about today we've talked about it

1:28:08

through the lens of money but it's

1:28:10

basically psychology well I think a lot

1:28:13

of things in life fall under this

1:28:15

umbrella of how do people make decisions

1:28:18

around uncertainty risk and lack of

1:28:21

information and that is health that is

1:28:24

politics that is friendships and

1:28:26

marriages and it's also money a lot of

1:28:28

things fall under the same umbrella

1:28:30

there's a study of like how do people

1:28:32

behave and one of the things I think is

1:28:35

important here is that you can learn so

1:28:36

much about money by studying and reading

1:28:39

fields that have nothing to do with

1:28:41

money I think you can learn more about

1:28:43

money by reading about politics military

1:28:45

history biology sociology than you will

1:28:47

by reading a finance book because you're

1:28:50

just trying to figure out how do people

1:28:51

make decisions how do you make decisions

1:28:53

and how do other people make decisions

1:28:55

and by and large you're not going to

1:28:56

learn that in an economics textbook but

1:28:58

you will learn about it by reading all

1:29:00

of these other fields that have nothing

1:29:01

to do with money what's your process for

1:29:03

writing I I I don't think this is a good

1:29:05

advice so if you're a writer out there

1:29:07

I'm not saying this is the right way to

1:29:08

do it but one of the things that I do

1:29:10

that I think is is not common is I write

1:29:15

by the time I get to the bottom of a

1:29:16

post it's pretty much the final draft

1:29:18

not because I can write a final draft in

1:29:22

in in the in the in one shot but because

1:29:24

I by and large don't move on to the next

1:29:26

sentence until I'm satisfied with the

1:29:28

previous one most writers most very good

1:29:31

writers will do the opposite they say

1:29:33

your first draft should just be a brain

1:29:35

dump and then you go back and edit and

1:29:37

it's that's never for whatever reason

1:29:38

it's never really worked for me so the

1:29:41

other thing is I can't sit I think I get

1:29:43

too anxious uh and jittery sitting for

1:29:46

too long so a lot of times I'll write

1:29:48

one sentence when I'm satisfied with it

1:29:50

I'll get up and like go do the laundry

1:29:52

and I'll come back and write two more

1:29:53

sentences and and then I'll go do the

1:29:54

dishes or walk my dog or something so

1:29:57

it's very sporadic like that and I think

1:29:58

that contrasts with a lot of writers who

1:30:00

are like oh I sit down and I can dump

1:30:02

5,000 words on the page and then I go

1:30:03

back and edit it that's that that that

1:30:05

is probably the the best advice to give

1:30:08

like that's what you should do and it's

1:30:10

for whatever reason this this never

1:30:12

really worked for me well you should do

1:30:13

what works for you I guess that that's

1:30:15

it but um most writers that I look up to

1:30:18

I think a much better writers than I do

1:30:19

it the opposite how do you hook people

1:30:22

you're one of the best at sort of you

1:30:24

and James CLE the two people who uh you

1:30:27

know the first sentence to your

1:30:28

paragraph and sort of like the first

1:30:30

part of your story really pulls people

1:30:33

in what would you what do you say what

1:30:34

do you think you do differently I think

1:30:36

it's a constant reminder of how how

1:30:38

impatient people are and if you don't

1:30:40

hook them in five seconds you're gone

1:30:41

and I know that because I'm a big reader

1:30:43

and if you don't hook me in five seconds

1:30:45

I'm probably gone unless you are like a

1:30:48

an author who I really know that I I

1:30:51

will give you a little bit more leeway

1:30:52

to be like okay I I don't know where

1:30:54

your article's going but I'm going to

1:30:55

I'm going to stick with you cuz I like

1:30:56

you if you're not that you got 5 Seconds

1:30:59

to catch your attention or else you're

1:31:00

out of there and I think that is a it's

1:31:04

it's easy to overlook that that it's not

1:31:06

just being

1:31:07

succinct you know in in the core of your

1:31:09

article but like it's uh it's it's

1:31:12

almost like an inverted period in where

1:31:13

it's like people are most impatient in

1:31:16

the first two

1:31:17

sentences it's like you would think it'd

1:31:19

be the other way around they would get

1:31:20

impatient after they've worked the way

1:31:22

through your article and they're getting

1:31:23

bored like no they're most impatient at

1:31:25

the top and there's a there's a lot of

1:31:27

data that can be very disheartening for

1:31:29

authors there was a mathematician who

1:31:31

looked at Kindle highlight data and he

1:31:33

used highlights as a proxy for how far

1:31:35

people make it in a book and the

1:31:37

Assumption was when people stop

1:31:38

highlighting in Kindle they probably

1:31:40

stopped reading and he showed that even

1:31:42

among bestselling books the most popular

1:31:44

books the average reader makes like a

1:31:46

quarter of the way through that's in the

1:31:48

best sellers that's in the good books a

1:31:50

quarter the way through and they're done

1:31:52

and so just always reminding yourself

1:31:54

how impatient people are it's just like

1:31:55

what's your point like make your point

1:31:57

and get the hell out of people's way I

1:31:59

also think Twitter has made people

1:32:01

better writers because the character

1:32:03

count limitation has forced people to be

1:32:07

like you have two sentences to tell me

1:32:09

your idea and that that that that's all

1:32:12

you get that's actually I think that's

1:32:14

been a great thing overall for making

1:32:15

people more succinct what makes a good

1:32:17

hook it could be a lot of things I could

1:32:19

think it could be funny it could be

1:32:21

profound we I think we were talking

1:32:23

about this last night about I I forget

1:32:24

who said it that like good writing fits

1:32:27

one of the acronyms of like OMG LOL you

1:32:31

know like like something like that it

1:32:32

should be shocking or funny or profound

1:32:35

or scary something like that that's

1:32:37

going to invoke em emotion yeah yeah

1:32:40

something like that I want to end with

1:32:42

two questions so one being what you can

1:32:46

um leave everybody some parting wisdom

1:32:49

on money and life what would it be I

1:32:52

think the most important is is to

1:32:54

realize how personal it is and therefore

1:32:57

you really got to be careful taking your

1:32:58

cues from other people you and I again

1:33:01

same same age same like like going down

1:33:04

the list you and I are very similar

1:33:05

people probably have very different

1:33:06

views about what to do with money and

1:33:07

that is fine just like you and I might

1:33:09

have different views about food you like

1:33:11

this food I like that doesn't mean that

1:33:13

you're wrong it's got different tastes

1:33:15

whatnot people understand that with food

1:33:17

but there is a a common sense with money

1:33:19

that there is one right answer for

1:33:20

everybody and so I think you really have

1:33:22

to be introspective look in the mirror

1:33:24

and just say like what works for myself

1:33:26

and my own family and even if there are

1:33:28

holes and flaws and other people

1:33:30

disagree with that if it works well for

1:33:32

me that's that's as good as you can do

1:33:34

that's an important thing and final

1:33:35

question what is success for you I heard

1:33:38

I think Jim o shanesy said uh that his

1:33:41

goal as a parent was not to raise good

1:33:44

kids it was to raise good adults like he

1:33:47

he wanted to be the kind of father that

1:33:49

when his kids became adults they were

1:33:50

well balanced that's different from

1:33:51

raising good kids you want to raise a

1:33:53

good adult

1:33:54

so that would be a big like maybe the

1:33:57

top box to check in my life is looking

1:34:01

back and being like my wife and I did

1:34:02

our best to cre to raise kids that

1:34:06

became good self-sufficient

1:34:07

well-balanced polite happy adults that's

1:34:11

excellent thank you very much Morgan

1:34:12

thanks Shane

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free