Outer Space: The Next Economic Frontier | WSJ
I'm Ariel Ekla. I did my PhD at MIT in
robotic self assembling space
structures. The idea basically being
like space legos that build themselves
in orbit so that you can ultimately have
infrastructure in space that is way
bigger than your biggest rocket payload
fairing. And something I like to call
out for people, especially here in New
York, if you're sitting in this room,
you are significantly closer to space
than you are to California. You're only
about 250 miles away from the
International Space Station. So
technically here we are closer to space
than Buffalo, New York. Uh which tends
to kind of surprise people because we
still think of space as very far away or
very hard. And so one of the messages
that I hope you all take away today,
particularly for this business audience,
is that space is no longer a sector that
may or may not be relevant for your
business. Space is a domain. It's a
physical emerging market. It's a layer,
particularly in low Earth orbit, that is
very close to Earth and now has amazing
potential to benefit people's day-to-day
lives in ways well beyond say GPS or
weather satellites, which we've all
become very familiar with. So today
we're going to talk about infrastructure
and architecture. You may be familiar
with space industry's love of Mars. Elon
Musk and SpaceX talk a lot about it. We
just had the amazing news about Artemis
2 historic mission. Astronauts went
farther out than we have ever sent
humans before, orbited around the moon
and came back. But what if we flipped
the script a little bit and said, "Okay,
it's lovely. It's really inspiring. It's
very important and motivational to have
these further out exploration
activities, but could we earn our right
to be a space fairing species by first
showing that we can take care of our
first planet? And so today's talk is
going to be about the infrastructure and
the opportunities in low Earth orbit
immediately relevant near-term
opportunities for building an industry
that would be profoundly beneficial for
our home planet and then hopefully be
the jumping off point for a lot of other
great infrastructure elsewhere in the
near neighborhood of our solar system.
So this is the current state of space
architecture. If you notice, it's all
essentially um aluminum tin cans. It's
pressure cylinders. And I always thought
that it was a little funny that you're
in space where you could grow your
architecture in any dimension and yet we
still do axial xyz
little coordinate planes for space
architecture which is a little funny. So
the alternative to this, how would we
change this paradigm? How could we learn
to build things that are not just
cylindrical because they don't have to
be squeezed into the tyranny of a rocket
tube of a rocket payload fairing? What
would it take to get to something like a
ring world, a much larger structure
often theorized in science fiction that
could actually encircle the Earth? Are
we that far away from this? It turns out
from a science perspective, no. We have
the material science. We have a lot of
the fundamental knowledge of physics,
orbital mechanics to be able to pull off
something like this. To be able to scale
to this kind of infrastructure though,
what we need is a different paradigm for
construction. and we need engineering
and funding progress.
So this is how the International Space
Station was originally constructed. This
is kind of a blowout model of the
current government space station up in
orbit. And the crazy thing is that many
of these pieces that you see in this
diagram were assembled like this
by hand.
So, astronauts doing an incredibly risky
and courageous maneuver in what we call
EVA suits, extra vehicular activity
suits. We call them that because a space
suit is essentially an entire space
vehicle. It's just wrapped around your
body closely. Building some of the most
advanced technology known to humankind
by hand. And this is kind of crazy. It
was very impressive for the first few
decades of human space flight. But we
know that this is not going to scale for
speed or efficiency or cost or even for
safety. It is a little bit wild that
this is how we still build in space. And
so for my PhD at MIT, what I looked at
was other ideas or archetypes for how
can you construct in a more autonomous
fashion really interesting things. And
it turns out from nature we have a lot
of lessons about self assembly. So there
are examples of how DNA self assembles
uh protein and DNA self assembles in
your cells in your body all the way up
to ants and termites self assembling
into little bridges that can actually
span gaps that would be too big for a
single ant to be able to cross. And so
building on some of these different
lessons about pieces parts in nature
where the logic for the final assembly
is actually built into the constituent
parts. What I designed were these tiles,
self assembling. We call them lovingly
space Legos where there's intelligence
built into each unit that helps all of
the units come together in some type of
a predetermined shape that can also grow
and scale a lot like this plant that
you're seeing on the screen. So, I'm
going to play a video for you that is an
artist's render of the work behind this
concept to enable really massive scale
self assembly of space structures. and
then we'll get into the tech and some of
the investment opportunities and
business opportunities that we hope will
come out of this kind of innovation.
So, I'm going to talk over the video a
little bit as you guys see it. So, we're
situating ourselves here in orbit around
the Earth. You're going to see a rocket
take off. This was modeled on a Falcon
9. So, we can do this even before Space
X's Starship becomes operational.
This could stay in orbit around the
Earth. It could go to the moon. In this
case, you're going to see it go all the
way to Mars. It doesn't really matter.
We just want to be in orbit around a
celestial body. And that's because when
you're in orbit around a planet or a
moon, you're in freef fall. So, you feel
like you're floating, which is why you
see all those amazing videos of
astronauts playing with water and all
the physics feeling very different. So,
now that we've got to our orbit, you're
going to see these tiles that are
basically packed flat like Pringles in a
can or like Pez dispenser if people
remember those candies from like a
decade ago. These tiles pop out one by
one and they have very powerful magnets
on their edges. So what these magnets
allow them to do because there's
floating, there's no friction, they're
not being weighed down by gravity, the
magnets pull them together really
elegantly. There's no propulsion
required, which is useful in this case
because propulsion is non-renewable.
Once you've used up all your chemicals
that are on your particular propulsion
unit, you don't have anything left. And
so this structure allows us to passively
with just the power of the magnets bring
these tiles together. And once one ball
or bucky ball has formed, multiple balls
can form together for a future space
station.
So if that was the artist's render, this
is all of the engineering that actually
makes it happen. So I've been working on
this since 2016, so about a decade now.
First at MIT and now at my spinout
Aurelia Institute. We have this
combination ecosystem. Aurelia Institute
is a incubator nonprofit where we do
really far future space research and
then we have Aurelia Foundry which is
our VC fund where we can invest in
technology that makes sense to spin out.
This is some technology that we have
spun out. I'll show you a little bit
more where it's headed after this but
these are the iterations of how we
actually test prototypes like this in
orbit. So we start on zero G flights.
Has anybody here been on a zero G flight
or familiar with it? Affectionately
known as the vomit comet.
So, this is a plane that does what you'd
want a plane never to do. The plane
pitches really steeply upwards at 45°,
noses over, points towards the ground at
45°. At the top of that arc, you get to
float. If the pilots are good, you get
about 20 to 30 seconds of true
weightlessness. It is incredibly
sublime. And then you do that arc 30 to
40 times in the sky. So it's like a
roller coaster in the sky. This is how
NASA trains astronauts. It's how we test
our work before we actually take it to
space proper. So this is an earth-based
simulation. You're basically in a short
period of freef fall inside of a plane.
So we do all kinds of testing on
platforms like these on Blue Origin's
New Shepard rocket. Yes, Katy Perry did
go up in that rocket. We went about 7
years earlier, but sadly not myself as a
human, just our research payload. Uh,
and then we have graduated now to
multiple tests inside of the
International Space Station. So, we take
these tiles and they're smaller than
what they would ultimately be as habitat
scale and we test them in miniature to
make sure that we get the algorithms
right and the code right and the
autonomous self assembly with the
magnets right as a precursor to now
preparing to really build at scale.
So, these are photos. Um, you're
actually looking down at Earth through
the Koopa window of the International
Space Station. Those tiles are about the
size of my palm and they self assembled
into this beautiful little fuette. You
might be wondering why is it a ball? So,
this is a subsection of the ball. It
turns out that to get stuff to space,
the part that's really expensive is the
exoskeleton. It's the surface area
that's going to encapsulate the
breathable air for the humans or the
satellites or whatever is going to be
stored inside of it. And a given for any
given surface area, you want to maximize
the volume that you get on the inside.
And a sphere is the perfect shape. But
it turns out it's kind of hard to
manufacture a sphere and pack that up in
bits in a rocket. So, a bucky ball or a
glorified soccer ball, which is the
shape of that ball that you saw in the
artist's render video, that is an
approximation of a sphere. And that's
why we're so interested in that
geometry.
So, here's a video from the
International Space Station um from
years ago now. Actually, we've continued
to really progress through the hardware
and you'll get to see what it looks
like. So, this is an astronaut's hand or
two hands inside of a glove box while
they're floating in orbit.
You'll see the tiles be very gingerly
released. He's trying not to impart any
emotion to them. The field of the
magnets cause them to do this dance to
piouette and dock together. So if you
ever put your MacBook charger into your
Mac and you feel how it kind of seats
itself, that magnet seating, that's
exactly what you just witnessed live.
Now imagine that happening at the scale
of a tile that is as big as this stage
and then 32 of those tiles coming
together to form a really massive
structure and that is the engineering
work that we're now doing and that we're
scaling up to. So I mentioned before
that we have this combination ecosystem
Aurelia Institute and Aurelia Foundry.
So the nonprofit research org and the VC
fund. We have just spun out our first
company to take this self assembly work
forward. It's called Rendezvous
Robotics. My passion is really human
space flight and turning this technology
into habitats. What Rendevu Robotics is
going to focus on is near-term beach
head markets in the space industry that
need massive scale self assembly but are
not quite as complicated as habitats.
Turns out it is really hard to get
humans to be able to breathe in space,
do all of the environmental control and
life support systems that you need. So
rendevous is going to focus on things
like massive solar panel arrays in
orbit. You can get very efficient solar
power when you're up above the clouds.
Things like massive communication
antennas for the national security
applications for the US government. And
yes, maybe even AI data centers in
space. I think we can have a great uh
debate off the stage about the technical
pros and cons of this as a concept. But
because there is so much capital being
thrown at this industrialization of AI,
we would really like to be able to be
that partner that can support the
inspace construction at massive scale.
If you're trying to build something that
is three or four football fields in
size, you're not going to fold that up
like origami into a rocket. You're going
to have to learn how to do modular self
assembly in space. So we're really
excited for the future of rendevous
robotics.
Taking this forward within Aurelia,
which is the incubator, we're thinking
about this technology roadmap. So, we've
built a 30foot habitat mockup. It's
actually up in an MIT lobby right now in
Boston if anybody would like to come and
see. And then this is a little bit of
our road map towards the other
structures that we'll be building in
space.
The first application that we think
we're going to have for a habitable
version of this infrastructure in orbit
is going to be a replacement to the
International Space Station, but with a
very specific flavor. And so this is
kind of the next few minutes of the talk
is going to take you guys through what
is a near-term pragmatic, you know,
something that will have revenue that
could actually be generated in lower
Earth orbit based on this type of
habitat tech. So, one of the motivating
factors is that the International Space
Station, which we've been continuously
inhabiting since the early 2000s, is
about to get shut down. NASA has decided
that they're going to decommission it in
2030 or 2031. What decommissioning means
is carefully take everything out of it
and let it burn up completely. Let it
incinerate in the atmosphere basically
and be no more. Um, they're very good at
this. We know how to do it safely, but
it is a huge gap for the United States
to not have a commercial or in this case
originally a government space station in
orbit. There are some proposals to try
to extend its life. But what NASA has
been doing is taking a playbook that
they did very successfully with SpaceX
where they basically said, "Hey SpaceX,
we want you to get us to the
International Space Station. We don't
want to have to supply the
transportation anymore." and they built
up space as a success in being able to
do that. NASA is now saying, "Hey, we
think we've spent enough time as a
nation in low Earth orbit with
government money. This emerging market
is really finally starting to build out.
We're going to let commercial companies
build space stations in low Earth orbit.
And we NASA will go further out. We'll
build the moon base on the moon like
Jared Isacman, the new NASA
administrator, just announced. will go
look for life on Europa. So, there's
this moment right now that's about to
open up for the first ever commercial
space station operators. And there's
maybe six companies that are vying to be
the replacement to the ISS. It's really
urgent. We need to be able to replace
this infrastructure, but we should also
expand. We shouldn't build it in exactly
the same way the second time that we
built it the first time. And so what
Aurelia Institute is looking at is how
could we add a specific type of
capability here to a future space
station. So we would not be the entirety
of the space station. We would use the
tesseray self assembling tech that you
guys saw to self assemble a biotech
module. And this is why. So two trends
here to kind of call out and take away
from this talk. The first is just the
drop in cost to get to space. So 15
years ago under the Obama administration
with the kind of the end of the NASA
shuttle program, it was about $50,000 a
kilogram to get mass to orbit to get
cargo to orbit. Today is about $1,500 a
kilogram. And with SpaceX's Starship
coming online, it's anticipated to be
under $200 a kilogram, which is
remarkable. That's like FedEx. If you
can ship something around the earth,
cargo, not the humans, we're a little
bit more fragile, a little more
expensive, but if you can ship cargo
around the world, you can ship it to
space. It's really remarkable how much
reusable rockets have profoundly changed
the economics of space, which is why
it's plausible to have these massive
scale buildouts of say hundreds of
thousands of space Legos building
infrastructure in space because we can
finally afford to ship that mass up to
space. The second really interesting
driver is that we've had 20 years of
really beautiful, exquisite
biotechnology research that has been
done by the government and some academic
partners on the International Space
Station across a whole range of
different topics. And it's ironic now
that we're about to lose the
International Space Station, right? When
we could finally be scaling up cures for
cancer, organoids, tissue engineering,
all of these really interesting
applications that have been developed in
microgravity because it turns out when
you're floating, the science performs
really differently, particularly biology
because so much of our biology evolved
here, in fact, all of it evolved here on
Earth in a gravity-based environment.
So, with the rise of AI models, wanting
ever more data about biology, and the
opportunity now to build on all of these
NASA insights, and the drop in cost to
get to space, we think we're about to
see basically a little explosion of new
startups and new activity in this
domain.
So, these are a few specific trends to
watch at the intersection of biotech and
space. The first is tissue engineering.
So, a wonderful example here is things
like artificial retinas. These are super
delicate little structures that get
implanted by a surgeon in the back of
your eye. In the future, if this company
that we're working with, if they get FDA
approval, it would be able to restore
sight due to loss of sight from macular
degeneration or retinitis pigmentotosa.
So, basically, as you age, if your eyes
are giving out on you, this is an
opportunity to have a replacement of
your retina. The reason it works so well
is that when you're floating in a
gravity environment, the delicate little
layers of the retina, which take 200
layers of the super super thin layering,
they sag if you're on Earth. They don't
sag when you're floating. And so you can
get this incredible quality improvement.
It's like a manufacturing quality
improvement by taking some of these
processes to space. Second category is
drugs that are based on aging. So it
turns out in the zero G environment,
we've started testing these little
things called organoids. Has anybody
heard of organoids here? It's a model of
organs. So these are tiny little clumps
of cells that are artificial models of
bigger organs in your body. It's really
important because it allows scientists
to grow them artificially without having
to practice on real organs every time we
want to develop a new cure or a new
drug. And it looks like these little
balls of artificial organs, these little
things that we call organoids, they grow
better in zerog than they do on the
ground. They have better 3D shape to
them and they mature a little bit
faster, which means that that's a great
target to test cancer drugs and
Alzheimer's drugs on that tissue in
space. So really, really profound. And
then the most exciting example of the
three, which should be relevant to some
of you here if you're tracking um a drug
like Kruda. So Merc's current cancer
drug, $30 billion drug, like 30 billion
in revenue. Amazing drug for Merc. It's
a cancer drug. They took an early
formulation to space to figure out the
crystallizing the protein
crystallization in the drug and that
helped them take it from a IVbased drug
where you have to go into the hospital
to a shot that you can do as an
outpatient. Now what they used space for
was just to get the data to be able to
make this new formulation. They do not
have to manufacture every dose of Kruda
in space. So it's a huge unlock for
Merc. We're super excited to be working
with a slew now of different biotech
partners to explore this potential of
microgravity for science data that can
change your drug formulation and then
maybe eventually manufacturing of really
unique drug formulations in zero g.
So, if you're curious how all of this
works within a space station and within
this new model of space stations that
we're pioneering, these self assembling
ones, this is a little bit about what
the system architecture, what we like to
call in the space industry, the conops,
the concept of operations might look
like. So, you have this payload fairing
from the tip of a rocket spits out the
tiles very gingerly, one by one. They
self assemble into this bucky ball, this
glorified soccer ball. On the inside of
the soccer ball, we have outfitted it to
be a next generation biolab. This means
best-in-class robotics, uh, benchtops
for not just astronauts, but citizen
scientists. So, I usually say it about
this point in the talk, if you guys have
kids, your kids may very well commute to
space for work. And maybe not 9 to5
every day, but in the way that you would
go two weeks on to go do a study in
Spalbard in the Arctic and then come
home for two weeks or three weeks on an
oil rig and then you get two weeks off.
That potential is now coming for space
applications in orbit like this. And so
you could very well have your child or a
niece or a nephew be a scientist who
doesn't have to be a NASA astronaut
their entire career, but they get to go
to space to be part of this new wave of
industry. And so we are really
intentionally designing now because as
architects we have to think about this
20 years in the future. We are designing
the interiors of these bio facilities in
space to be more welcoming to a much
broader swath of humanity. And then you
see a little uh Dragon capsule. So this
is an example of a current delivery
vehicle that is part of the SpaceX
ecosystem that is able to dock with that
space station, bring up samples, bring
up supplies, and then take some of the
research back down, take some of the
samples or the produced activities back
down.
So we're coming to the end of the talk
here and I just wanted to call out two
really big picture ideas that I think
you can take away from the field of
space architecture which feels very new
to many people. So the first is I just
shown you this example of an orbital
biolab
near-term a lot of capital being put
into this right now. But if we take a
step back, the reason that space is such
a special domain to build in is that you
can make things that you would never
have been able to make on Earth. And so
I just want to show you guys this
example as one of the two closing
thoughts. This was meant to be Newton's
scenet. So it was meant to be a memorial
to Isaac Newton. It was designed in the
mid to late 1800s. It's a 150 meter span
dome. And those tiny tiny little things
that you guys see on the screen at the
bottom, those are the humans for scale.
This could not be built at the time
because it would be near impossible to
build an arch of that span. But this is
the kind of monument to humanity. If we
have ambitions as a society and as a
space fairing species to go out and do
really big things, this is the kind of
thing you could uniquely build in space
because you don't have gravity. You're
going to have other forces. You're going
to have some air pressure trying to push
out against a vacuum. But this is the
kind of incredible monumental
architecture that we could be building
in space. And so I really like to
encourage people to think about space as
this domain that opens up not a blank
slate, but an incredible new series of
opportunities for humanity. And it's
worth also thinking about this in the
context of what I call the
anthropocsmos, which we need to do a
little bit of better branding on that.
We need a slightly less of a tongue
twister, but the idea is to call into
consideration this notion of the
anthroposine, which is the era of
Earth's history where we've now come to
accept that humanity has a really
dominant role on Earth for good and for
worse. If we're about to go into our
next era where we will have all of this
opportunity and potentially a big impact
as a species on the near neighborhood of
our solar system, that would be the era
of the anthropo.
And it comes with really amazing
opportunities but also a lot of
responsibilities. And so at Aurelia
Institute we try to think of the balance
of those different opportunities and
policy work about the responsibilities.
And then the final idea that I want to
leave you with today if Newton's scen is
an example of kind of looking outward
and looking up and into space about what
we could build. This is an idea to
anchor us back on earth like we started
at the beginning of the talk. So there's
this notion in science fiction about
off-worlding, not off-worlding the
humans, but off-worlding the heavy
industry. So get mining, get chemical
byproduct manufacturing that pollutes
our waterways. Try to eventually get
those industries off of Earth. You can
do them in space in some cases in a much
more responsible way. It's not like
we're just going from polluting Earth to
polluting space. When you're in the
vacuum, you don't have a water vapor
atmosphere that's trapping a lot of this
stuff in the way that we trap it down
here on Earth in our biosphere. So,
there's a really profound opportunity to
begin to think of space as a tool for
Earth. So, space exploration is not
about abandoning Earth. If you don't
want to go live and die on Mars with
Elon, that's okay. He's allowed to do
that, making incredible progress towards
it. But we can also use space
technologies as a lever to help Earth
and to try to treat Earth well and maybe
eventually let Earth recover as a garden
planet. And I think one of the maybe the
first applications of this is things
like AI deniseters in space. They're the
first new wave of industrialization that
hasn't really been built extensively on
Earth yet. Maybe it's a great
opportunity to move that natively into
space. begin thinking about offloading
off-worlding that carbon footprint
before we have a big scale out. So,
there's some really interesting
near-term opportunities with things like
off-worlding.
And on that note, I just want to say I
think it's time to build. I hope I've
shown you a bunch of different ways that
we might be able to get there with self
assembly, future of orbital biotech in
space, and then also just these grand
ambitions that I think we can have as a
society, as a species around going out
to space and having great exploration
opportunities, but also thinking about
space as a tool for Earth. And let's put
space to work for Earth. Thank you so
much.
More transcripts
Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

[ DARING ] XI RPL 2 - Kegiatan Minggu Pertama
ebadrus.com · Indonesian

Sesi 1 | Memahami Esai Secara Luas
Rita Primayuni · Indonesian

Why 99% of Power Bank Reviewers Are WRONG! (UGREEN Nexode 200W Test)
TechDayEveryDay · Polish

Milenial Anti Narkoba - BNN Short Movie
Lembaga Administrasi Negara RI · English

Hidrokarbon (1) | Kekhasan Dan Jenis-Jenis Atom Karbon (C) | Kimia kelas 11
Kimatika · Indonesian

IA GRÁTIS que Faz Cortes de Vídeos e Podcast - CELULAR e PC
Ygor Ortega Editor de Vídeos · Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil)

とあ - ツギハギスタッカート - ft.初音ミク ( Toa - Patchwork Staccato - ft.Hatsune Miku )
- Toa Official - · Japanese

El poder del autocoaching en 5 pasos
Psicólogo Abel Núñez · Spanish

Khutbah Jum'at Paling Menyentuh. - Ustadz Adi Hidayat
Adi Hidayat Official · Indonesian

CSL Pewarnaan Gram BEM FK UNIBOS
BEM FK UNIBOS · English

Gwen Visits Miles | Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023) | Now Playing
NOW PLAYING · English

Apa Itu Manajemen Perkantoran? Dasar-Dasar yang Wajib Diketahui Siswa MPLB!
Ruang Edukatif · Indonesian
Get the TLDR of any YouTube video
Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.