Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Work Session - 03/03/2026

1:38:20EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
0:46

like to officially call our work session

0:49

to order.

0:52

>> Mr. Trudeau, could you please call the

0:54

role?

0:57

>> Miss Davis,

0:58

>> present.

0:59

>> Miss Green.

1:01

>> Mr. Jones,

1:03

>> here.

1:04

>> Mr. Lson,

1:06

>> here. Miss Rose

1:10

>> present.

1:11

>> Mr. Rodriguez

1:12

>> present.

1:13

>> Miss Hill

1:14

>> present.

1:16

Um for committee business this evening

1:19

we you will hear the work of two

1:21

committees. The administration committee

1:23

and the public works committee. Um we

1:26

will begin with uh the public works

1:29

committee just for the interest of time

1:30

and the benefit. Um, so I will defer to

1:33

our public works committee chair,

1:35

Councilman Rodriguez, to lead

1:37

discussion.

1:38

>> Thank you, Madame President. Um, on our

1:41

agenda today, public works committee

1:43

will be discussing three, well, two

1:46

resolutions in a bill. Um, uh, Mr.

1:48

Truder, would you mind reading bill 4 of

1:51

2026 into the record, please?

1:53

Bill 4, 2026, an ordinance amending

1:56

chapter 9-301 of title 9 of the

2:00

Harrisburg City Code regarding the

2:02

municipal waste recycling and composting

2:04

composting to authorize the

2:06

identification and designation of

2:08

business establishments for the

2:10

placement of the city designated litter

2:12

receptacles, hotspot cans outside public

2:14

exits consistent with the findings of

2:16

the Pennsylvania Litter Action Plan

2:18

2021.

2:20

>> Thank you for that. And um I just wanted

2:22

to make it known that this is in

2:24

collaboration with the Pennsylvania

2:26

litter control plan as well as the

2:27

Harrisburg comprehensive plan. So the

2:30

Harrisburg comprehensive plan HBG 2020

2:32

is a long range policy document guided

2:35

land loose transportation economic

2:37

development housing utilities public

2:39

service and natural cultural resources.

2:41

It sets priorities for future growth and

2:43

development ensuring decisions are based

2:45

on analysis of current and projected

2:47

conditions. While it does not directly

2:49

address the litter cleanup, it supports

2:51

environmental stewardship by shaping

2:53

policies that can influence waste

2:55

management, public space design, and

2:57

community engagement. My hope is moving

2:59

forward, we can integrate and amend this

3:01

living document known as the

3:02

comprehensive plan to reflect this here

3:05

litter mitigation, greener and cleaner

3:07

city neighborhoods in collaboration with

3:08

environmental friendly entities and

3:10

organizations. Um, under the

3:12

comprehensive plan under park, open and

3:14

civic space, it does refer to pollution

3:16

remediation and ecological stewardship,

3:19

which this legislation aligns with

3:21

perfectly. Um, for this, the roll out is

3:23

looking for late spring, early summer,

3:26

and the goal is to have the hotspots

3:28

cans located at the now defined

3:30

convenience stores and bodeas that are

3:32

now defined by this legislation as

3:34

hotspots. The intention is to work with

3:36

Mr. cues to help identify those entities

3:39

that we can supply the respective

3:40

receptacles at these locations. Um it

3:44

was just something I was not only myself

3:46

but a lot of community members for as

3:48

long as I've been on council have spoke

3:50

about corner store ordinances and the

3:52

cleanliness of our neighborhoods. So,

3:54

just to attach this to Hotspot

3:56

Saturdays, um we had a great

3:57

comprehensive meeting with the mayor's

3:59

office, uh legal as well as public

4:02

works, and we took maybe a few months to

4:05

fine-tune it and get it where it needed

4:06

to be in the code, but I'm very proud

4:08

that we now have the actual definition

4:10

of what a convenience store and bodega

4:12

uh is and are, which we have not

4:15

previously. So, very appreciative of the

4:17

work from our law offices. Um so, thank

4:20

you, Mr. Grover, and your team. Thank

4:21

you, Mr. West, and your team. and of

4:23

course the mayor's office and my

4:25

colleagues on council and thank you for

4:26

the long champions of this bill. Um

4:28

people like Rafika Muhammed, Mr. Leela

4:30

Nelson, people from the EAC and previous

4:33

and eons before that spoke about this

4:35

and fought for this and for some reason

4:37

whether or not we couldn't just pull the

4:38

trigger on it. So I'm really happy to be

4:40

able to bring Bill 4 of 2026 in front of

4:43

council tonight for consideration. Um I

4:45

see Mr. West is with us. I didn't know

4:47

if you wanted to add anything. Maybe

4:48

talk about the outdated cobblestone

4:50

receptacles and why it's important to

4:52

get these in front of the stores

4:56

if council

4:57

just in case they may have questions.

4:59

>> Yes, please.

5:01

>> If council's not aware, um there used to

5:03

be old like cobblestone heavy heavy

5:06

trash receptacles around the city. Very

5:08

outdated. Um they've they've stopped

5:11

being uh really used for a while. So, if

5:12

we put these in the designated now uh

5:15

defined corner stores and bodega spaces

5:18

when patrons come out and throw away

5:20

trash, they will have somewhere

5:21

specific, not the typical everyday black

5:24

cans that the the customers or

5:26

businesses pay to have their trash

5:28

thrown out. These are designated litter

5:30

remediation cans that they'll have. This

5:33

way, we can kind of keep the city

5:34

beautified and uh have a specific place

5:36

for them to throw their waste. Uh Mr.

5:39

West, did you want to touch briefly on

5:41

maybe the outdated cobblestone cans and

5:43

why it's important um to actually use

5:46

the ones we were speaking about with the

5:47

holes in them?

5:49

>> Yes. Uh good evening, council.

5:51

>> Good evening,

5:52

>> council members. Yes. Uh for a long

5:55

period of time, we did have these round

5:57

cobblestone. They were very outdated uh

6:00

cans. They Well, they held the cans and

6:02

we had to purchase these uh metal cans

6:05

to place inside of them. And they were

6:09

being stolen by the people who were

6:12

collecting scrap and we had to continue

6:15

to replace them over and over again. Uh

6:18

so we wanted to start the initiative. We

6:21

did we started at a couple of stores on

6:23

the hill where we took uh we bought some

6:26

lids that had a hole in the top and they

6:30

were orange color orange color lids with

6:33

the black cans. So we start using them

6:38

a couple of the stores on the hill and

6:40

it act the program actually worked. You

6:43

know, it was a pilot and uh there were

6:46

people walking up and down the street,

6:48

they were using the can because a can

6:49

was there. At one time when we took the

6:52

cans away and we didn't have any cans

6:54

there, people were just throwing the

6:56

trash in the street, which made it worse

6:59

for not even for for the city looking

7:01

bad. also with um our sweepers to clean

7:06

the streets like they would throw

7:08

bottles and things like that and the

7:10

equipment was not made to pick up things

7:13

that heavy. So you either had to have

7:16

someone walking the streets and cleaning

7:18

up throughout the streets and asking the

7:20

vendors, you know, to clean up the

7:22

outside of the curb. They would throw

7:24

things in the street and the vendors

7:26

would say that's a city issue. It's not

7:28

my property.

7:29

So, uh, the cans with the hole in them

7:32

would work well. It would at least have

7:35

an attraction for individuals to see

7:37

that there's somewhere to throw their

7:39

trash.

7:40

>> And our team will know um when to

7:42

dispose of them.

7:44

>> When our team, the public works team,

7:46

they'll Yes. Yes.

7:47

>> Oh, yes. We we'll dump them accordingly.

7:49

And what what we do is we'll place them

7:51

out and and we'll continue as as they're

7:56

sitting there, people will continue to

7:58

start to use them and we can um dump

8:01

them actually every day if needed. Y

8:03

>> you know, because we have someone in

8:05

areas five days a week,

8:07

>> you know, we have our luxury of having a

8:10

small sanitation packer to go through

8:12

areas that we need. once we see the

8:14

volume that's placed there as they

8:16

continue to use and we'll make the

8:18

necessary adjustments.

8:20

>> Awesome. Thank you for that. I have

8:22

nothing further, but I'd like to open it

8:23

up to council. Um, start on the far

8:26

right with Councilman Lawson.

8:30

>> Thank you, uh, Councilman Rodriguez. And

8:34

I I I uh and thank you, Mr. West, for

8:37

for coming to to present and and help us

8:40

answer some questions. what I don't

8:42

remember seeing and and I I may not have

8:46

put enough search into this, but is

8:49

there any penalty for um said uh

8:53

establishment for not providing or

8:56

maintaining these cans?

8:57

>> Yeah, so that there's actually a penalty

8:59

already in the ordinance. Maybe

9:00

solicitor Grover can speak to that.

9:03

>> They added this provision to the

9:05

municipal

9:06

um what do we call it?

9:10

the municipal waste code is what we call

9:12

it. And so that's a fairly lengthy code

9:15

which has its own penalty provisions.

9:17

And so um we've added that and there's a

9:20

there's a separate penalty in in the

9:22

health code for litter. So in this

9:25

provision, the last section that we put

9:26

in says, uh if a violation would be a

9:30

violation of either the litter provision

9:32

in health or this, it's the penalties in

9:34

this provision that will apply in the

9:36

waste code which are higher and it has

9:40

It has stages where it can go up for a

9:42

violation. So, um, first offense is less

9:45

than the second offense, and it's it

9:47

could be a major offense or a minor

9:49

offense. It's a fairly complicated

9:51

process. It's not the kind of thing

9:53

where I think we're trying to penalize

9:54

the store owners. We're just trying to

9:56

get them to assist in in knocking litter

9:59

down. It's coming out their front door.

10:02

>> That's great. I I just wanted to make

10:03

sure that we had something set so that

10:05

we had incentive for people to comply

10:08

and to adopt and to help keep the the

10:12

streets a little cleaner, make it make

10:14

life a little easier for our residents

10:16

as they're walking, you know, back and

10:18

forth coming from the stores. And and

10:20

also for our public works department, as

10:23

you're saying, trying to deal with what

10:25

we had before with the cobblestones or

10:27

deal with what we had with uh the the

10:29

trash overflowing that. So, I'm I'm all

10:32

for this. Thanks.

10:33

>> Thank you. Uh, is Councilwoman Green

10:36

online at all? I just wanted to make

10:39

sure. I didn't want to. All right. I

10:41

hope it

10:41

>> Yes, I'm here. Thank you, Councilman

10:42

Rodriguez. Absolutely. I don't have any

10:44

questions regarding this. Um, it's it's

10:46

pretty simple and straightforward. I

10:47

know it's something we've discussed um

10:49

several times in the past, so I'm just

10:50

glad to see it come to fruition. I think

10:52

it' be a great asset to the city. So,

10:54

thank you for working on this.

10:55

>> Thank you, Councilwoman and FeP.

10:58

>> Uh, thank you. Um, no questions at the

11:00

moment. Thank you, Madam V. Uh, Madam

11:03

President.

11:04

>> Thank you. I have a few questions

11:05

regarding the pilot program.

11:08

Um, I was just curious. Well, first,

11:11

thank you for describing what a litter

11:14

remediation trash can looks like versus

11:17

the another one. Um, my first question

11:20

is how many litter remediation trash

11:23

cans were involved in the pilot?

11:26

Like how many trash cans total?

11:29

You said it was in Allison Hill.

11:31

>> Yes. Okay.

11:32

>> They they were on Dair Street.

11:34

>> Okay.

11:35

>> Uh from

11:37

13th to

11:39

19th.

11:40

>> Okay.

11:43

Um and how long were the trash cans

11:46

there?

11:47

>> For about 6 months.

11:48

>> Oh, okay.

11:52

Um, and then my final question, I don't

11:56

I guess how will the hotspot kins, how

12:00

will this program, since it it would

12:02

become official, um, be evaluated moving

12:05

forward?

12:07

>> How

12:08

>> how are you going to evaluate the

12:11

success of this program moving forward?

12:14

Well, once we start once we place the

12:17

cans at the locations,

12:19

>> we will uh continue to monitor to see if

12:23

the volume of pickup becomes more and

12:27

more. Uh like we'll start with once a

12:29

week. Okay.

12:30

>> As we continue, we'll monitor each area

12:32

of of pickup to see if it's improving or

12:35

if it's staying the same or if it's

12:39

decreasing. because if they don't use

12:41

the cans, then there's no need to pick

12:43

them up. So, we'll hold we'll we'll put

12:45

it like a a six month spreadsheet

12:48

>> for each individual locations, how many

12:52

times we pick them up throughout the

12:54

week and so forth and so on. And we will

12:57

distribute that to council once we do

12:59

once we finish the paper.

13:01

>> Okay, that sounds good. Thank you. I

13:02

don't have any other questions.

13:03

>> You're welcome. Thank you, Madam

13:04

President. Councilwoman Ross.

13:08

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez, and

13:10

thank you for being here, Director West.

13:12

Um I don't have any questions. I know

13:13

this is something that um Councilman

13:15

Rodriguez has been working with on um

13:18

the public works committee for some

13:20

time. Um and I I do think it's something

13:23

that's necessary to continue to keep our

13:25

streets um beautiful. Um also, if people

13:30

have somewhere to throw trash away, nine

13:32

times out of 10, they're going to put it

13:33

there. it's when there's nowhere to put

13:35

it that um litter does start to occur.

13:39

So, I think this will be something great

13:41

um for our city. Uh my only question,

13:44

well, not a question, but visual. I'm a

13:46

visual person. And so I was just

13:47

wondering if there's any way to get a

13:48

picture if uh of what that might look

13:51

like or and when the initiative um you

13:54

know when it's passed if it's passed

13:55

however goes um after tonight if there's

13:58

something that can go up on our website

14:01

just to say that this is something

14:02

that's going to effect and what the

14:04

trash cans look like and helping us

14:06

keeping the city beautiful. I just

14:08

wonder if that was

14:09

>> Absolutely. Would it be okay if I

14:10

stopped by public works maybe got a

14:12

picture of the can

14:12

>> a shot of the can with the orange lids?

14:14

Definitely. Definitely. I think for us,

14:16

for the community, just so they know

14:17

this is why they're out here.

14:19

>> Let's work together. This is what they

14:21

look like. I I think, you know, make it

14:23

a citywide thing.

14:24

>> So,

14:25

>> yes, that's it.

14:26

>> And another thing uh council needs to be

14:28

aware of that we're not spending any

14:31

extra money to purchase cans for this

14:34

initiative on the side. These are cans

14:37

that are already set within the budget

14:39

for the cans that we have. Thank you for

14:42

that extra um piece of information.

14:44

Thank you. That's it from me.

14:45

>> That'd be something great to get over to

14:47

our research analysts for uh the new

14:49

initiative that she's working on. So

14:51

that will go hand in hand. Awesome. And

14:53

uh Councilwoman Davis.

14:55

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Thank

14:57

you, Mr. West, for being here.

14:59

>> You answered my question in terms of how

15:03

much is this costing the city, but there

15:05

are the payans are already paid for it.

15:08

>> Yes.

15:08

>> Okay. Exactly.

15:09

>> We have a budget of

15:10

>> a certain amount of cans every year and

15:13

we have

15:15

>> uh significant amount of cans that we

15:17

purchased last year that we didn't even

15:20

start purchasing cans this year that the

15:22

money that council and the mayor passed

15:24

for the cans for this year. We haven't

15:26

even touched that money yet.

15:28

>> Okay, great. Thank you. I was wondering

15:31

if we reached out to the store owners to

15:35

maybe let them know to make them aware

15:37

that these cans are coming to maybe

15:40

encourage them in some way. I know in my

15:44

area, I stop by a couple of the stores

15:47

and if I see trash out there, I will

15:50

actually go in the store and ask the

15:52

store owner to maybe gather up a couple

15:55

kids, you know, in the neighborhood and

15:57

have them GI the area,

16:00

>> but I was just wondering. Yeah, I think

16:03

once it becomes ordinance, um, there'll

16:05

be a roll out and I'll be working with

16:07

public works to get that information to

16:09

them and let them know what these orange

16:10

lids are popping up in front of their

16:12

establishments and how to obtain them

16:14

and upkeep them. That was actually one

16:16

thing that Madame Mayor was a stickler

16:18

about. She wanted to make sure that the

16:19

corner stores or bodeas upkept them and

16:22

I was in total agreeance to that. So,

16:24

>> thank you for that, Councilman

16:25

Rodriguez. That's it for me.

16:27

>> Awesome. Thank you. Um, Director West,

16:28

is there anything you wanted to add as

16:30

far as bill uh four of 26 before we move

16:33

forward?

16:34

>> No, just know that um the cans will not

16:36

sit and overflow. We will make sure and

16:40

um and stay consistent in making sure

16:43

that they're dumped. So there it won't

16:45

be another waste site for people, you

16:48

know, to bring their trash to when they

16:49

see overflowing cans and they put their

16:52

trash. That will not happen. That

16:54

happened before, but it will not happen

16:57

again. It happened when we had the stone

16:58

cans and and it was a mess actually with

17:01

the stone cans because it was it was

17:04

they just didn't have the capacity of

17:06

the holes to war when it rained and

17:08

deteriorated the cans. We kept

17:10

purchasing cans and

17:12

>> and this init initiative because we have

17:14

holes in the bottom of the cans for

17:18

waste to not uh overflow in the can the

17:21

water to not overflow in the can this

17:23

wouldn't happen and we're going to

17:25

monitor.

17:25

>> Awesome. Thank you for that. And then um

17:28

just another part of committee business,

17:30

this in conjunction with the EAC, which

17:32

is now um dated to be up and running

17:35

here at the end of this month. They will

17:37

reconvene with a full quorum. So very

17:39

super excited about that. And I did get

17:42

uh the mayor's um promise that she will

17:44

be making her appointments, although

17:45

it's not necessary for them to meet. Uh

17:47

we are working in full conjunction and

17:49

the EAC will be back up and running with

17:51

their first meeting at the end of this

17:53

month. So, a lot of great things coming

17:54

out here um momentarily. Uh so, moving

17:57

forward, uh resolution 10 of 2026. Mr.

18:00

Trudale, do you mind to please read

18:02

Resolution 10 of 2026 into the record?

18:05

Resolution 10, 2026, a resolution

18:08

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

18:10

negotiate and enter into a lease

18:11

agreement with Lamar Advantage GP

18:14

Company LLC for the purpose of

18:16

constructing and maintaining a billboard

18:18

on a portion of city property fronting

18:20

Paxton Street located at 1812 Paxton

18:23

Street.

18:24

>> Thank you for that. And of course, Mr.

18:25

West is still here with us. Mr. West, if

18:27

you'd like to give an overhaul, just a

18:29

quick review of what actually this res

18:31

uh resolution is stating for council,

18:33

please. You talking about the signage?

18:36

>> Yes, the billboard.

18:37

>> That's 1820 Paxton.

18:40

>> It says 1812 over here.

18:43

>> So, just a correction for the record.

18:45

1820.

18:51

>> Oh, okay. Oh, we got Antonio.

18:55

We can move for Well, uh, let me see.

18:58

>> Are you resolution 8 while we have Mr.

19:00

West? Um, that's still the billboard on

19:02

a portion of the city I 83 located. So,

19:04

I guess Mr. West, that was that was it.

19:06

Bill four for you and Antonio can come

19:08

up and discuss resolution 10 and 11 of

19:11

2026.

19:12

>> Yes. Yes. Thank you.

19:18

>> Okay. Madame President, would you like

19:20

me to continue with this in business?

19:23

>> Yes, please continue.

19:24

>> Absolutely. Uh, so I see Antonio here.

19:27

Great to see you. Yeah.

19:28

>> Um, if you'd like to give a overhaul of

19:30

resolution 10 of 2026, please for

19:32

council.

19:34

>> Sure. Uh, Antonio Magna, Business

19:35

Administrator's Office. Uh, thank you

19:37

again, council. Um, I have Mike Adams

19:39

here from Lamar as well. I'll give a a

19:43

breakdown of kind of what's in this

19:44

agreement and then Mike and I can answer

19:46

some questions that everyone has.

19:48

effectively uh for the resolution 10 and

19:52

11 uh the the biggest difference that

19:54

these two are going to have compared to

19:55

the other three resolutions is that uh

19:58

there's going to be a construction of

19:59

two signs um at the 1812 Paxton Street

20:02

location. Um in the resolutions there's

20:05

a picture of where the the location is

20:07

and where exactly the two signs will be.

20:09

>> I'm sorry I'm sorry to cut you off.

20:11

Since you are speaking in terms of both

20:13

res resolutions, I'll just have Mr. Mr.

20:15

Trudale, read resolution 11 of 2026 into

20:18

the record and we can just knock it out

20:19

one time.

20:20

>> Mr. Trudale, can you please read

20:22

Resolution 11 of 2026 into the record?

20:24

>> Resolution 11, 2026, a resolution

20:27

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

20:28

negotiate and enter into a lease

20:30

agreement with Lamar Advantage GP

20:32

Company LLC for the purpose of

20:34

constructing and maintaining a billboard

20:36

on a portion of city property fronting I

20:38

83 located at 1812 Paxton Street.

20:41

>> Okay. Would that be 1820?

20:43

No, it's 181 1812. Okay. 182 just for

20:46

continuity. This way we can keep it all

20:47

on board. Please proceed. Thank you.

20:49

>> Yep. Um so as I was saying uh in the in

20:51

the resolutions uh there is images

20:53

attached uh to show you where the

20:54

location of the signs will be built. Um

20:57

the key here is that this these

20:58

contracts are going to be for 15 years

21:00

in length. uh they start at $12,900

21:04

uh in rent uh for the entire year and

21:06

then they kind of go up depending uh on

21:09

which resolution we're talking about.

21:10

For 10 and uh 12 or 10 and 11, sorry, uh

21:14

they go from 12,900 for the first five

21:17

years. For years 6th through year 11,

21:20

it'll increase to 14,196.

21:23

Years 12 through 15, then we'll be at

21:26

15,600.

21:28

And then at year 16 uh and ongoing from

21:31

there uh it's going to be 17,160.

21:34

Um so you can see on exhibit C in the

21:36

resolutions there's a breakdown of the

21:38

monthly payments. Um there's also a

21:41

second option in there where uh if the

21:44

gross revenues for Lamar exceed uh

21:46

certain percentages 15% for the first

21:48

five, 17.5%

21:50

years 6 through 11 and 20% onwards. uh

21:53

then we can actually collect based on

21:55

those percentages of the gross revenue

21:57

instead of the monthly income if those

21:59

exceed the monthly uh rent. So um and

22:03

then the other key here is that uh these

22:05

leases will uh for the construction

22:07

parts will start either the first day of

22:10

the calendar month following uh the date

22:12

that the construction of the sign is

22:14

completed or uh within the fir within

22:17

nine months. So at the nine month mark

22:19

uh the lease will automatically start

22:21

then.

22:21

>> Awesome. Thank you for that. And uh the

22:23

gentleman to my right, your left, if

22:25

you'd like to.

22:26

>> My name is Mike.

22:26

>> Can you speak directly into the mic,

22:28

please?

22:28

>> Uh my name is Mike Adams. I'm the real

22:30

estate director for Lamar Advertising

22:31

here in Le Moy. U if anybody's not

22:34

familiar with us, we're the largest

22:36

advertising company here in the in the

22:38

midstate.

22:41

Basically, the reason why we came in

22:42

here, we used to have on a billboard on

22:45

right on that site right in the corner.

22:48

It was taken down as part of the uh

22:49

transportation project. when we first

22:51

started trying to to figure out where to

22:53

put it back in 2022. It appears PEDOT is

22:57

finally starting to at least draw some

22:58

harder lines so we can at least start to

23:02

work out where we might be able to

23:03

locate. Um we're on a what I'm going to

23:06

call, for lack of a better way to put

23:08

it, a very short timeline.

23:10

Normally these things take about 18

23:12

months to 21 months to get done, but uh

23:14

we agreed to do the nine months. The key

23:16

is is with pendots, everything they're

23:19

working on out there and you have an

23:21

active public works area out there. We

23:24

cannot interfere with them. We do not

23:25

take up a lot of space, but they have we

23:29

have to ensure that they hit all the

23:30

traffic flows and everything that they

23:32

work on. So location is going to matter.

23:36

Along 83, you're pretty much looking

23:39

will be what you would refer to as what

23:41

a standup billboard looks like. It'll be

23:43

1448. Look the same as every other one

23:46

down through that corridor.

23:48

What we're also asking to do is to go up

23:51

onto Paxton Street, which is a little

23:53

bit different. Now, up there, the board

23:56

won't look like that. It'll look more

23:58

like the the ones you're seeing built

23:59

currently. It'll look the design is a

24:02

lot different. It'll be, how should I

24:05

say, fit neighborhood design, for lack

24:07

of a better way to put it. We'll put

24:09

public works on the top of it, city seal

24:11

on it. It'll look really nifty, but all

24:14

of that stuff takes a bit of time to do.

24:18

If we talk about the leases in general,

24:21

it was brought up very simply, these

24:23

things have a revenue share on it. And

24:25

what they mean is

24:27

if these boards do better than what we

24:29

expect, you participate.

24:32

>> You get paid. If they don't, it doesn't

24:36

make any difference. we pay you that

24:38

base rent and it doesn't. I fully expect

24:40

these sports to do fairly well,

24:41

especially the one on Paxton Street if

24:44

we can. But again, with everything going

24:47

on out there, it's for me is at the end

24:50

of the day, I've been put on a very

24:52

short lease in nine months to get these

24:54

things done. It's who do I talk to with

24:56

design? How do we set up someone to help

24:59

with where these things go?

25:01

That type of ar that type of thing.

25:04

>> Absolutely.

25:04

>> Okay. That's really from our side of it

25:06

where we are. Uh we do over a million

25:10

dollars worth of pro bono advertising in

25:12

this area every single year. The city

25:14

participates. We do a lot of stuff with

25:16

you. So I that's basically my a bridged

25:19

version. I think I heard on the essence

25:21

of time.

25:22

>> Awesome.

25:23

>> So if you have any questions, I'll be

25:24

more than happy to answer.

25:25

>> Well, thank you for that. I think um

25:28

>> any additional mechanism that can help

25:29

draw in some revenue for the city is a

25:31

plus. And by way of advertising, I see

25:34

it as a double plus. Okay.

25:35

>> Um, so the one on 18th, that would be at

25:37

the public works building or above the

25:39

public works building like behind near

25:41

the highway area.

25:42

>> Yeah. Where I kind of see it right now.

25:44

If you look where Pendock condemned the

25:46

building next to it, then they have a

25:47

paper street and then they put that

25:51

>> wall like tight.

25:52

>> Gotcha.

25:53

>> So I'm going to try to basically where

25:54

I'm thinking of it is to hug that

25:57

building as tight as I can so you don't

26:00

have any traffic flow move. So I don't

26:01

I'm trying not to affect any traffic.

26:03

>> Yeah. No, I understand.

26:03

>> That's exactly where it is. Before it

26:05

was up on it was up closer to the

26:09

interchange.

26:10

>> I just don't know how that's going to

26:11

work right now with Pendot working.

26:13

Right.

26:13

>> There's no way in nine months they're

26:14

done. I'm can assure you of that.

26:16

>> My question would be for businesses um

26:20

entities that like to participate in

26:22

order to get their let's say information

26:24

business event on the bulletin. Is it

26:26

something we can cross-promote on the

26:28

city's website to help get that

26:29

notoriety out or how can we collaborate

26:32

to get even more individuals to perhaps

26:35

pay for these uh promotions,

26:36

endorsements, etc.

26:39

>> We'll figure that out.

26:41

>> Yeah.

26:42

>> Gotcha. Gotcha. Well, if if someone was

26:44

interested in promoting, how would they

26:46

reach uh

26:47

>> they would just contact our office. They

26:49

would go to our sales team. I have Tim

26:50

Joyce who's here tonight. He's the vice

26:52

president, general manager for the

26:54

office here. Well, just for the people

26:56

at home, maybe they're interested in

26:57

their business. Is there a number or

26:59

website you want in

27:00

>> uh lamar.com or or Lamar Harrisburg?

27:03

Either one of those two. You search any

27:04

one of those, you can find us.

27:05

>> Awesome. Well, thank you. Um I have

27:07

nothing further. I will open it up to my

27:10

immediate left right now with

27:11

Councilwoman Davis.

27:12

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Good

27:14

evening, Mr. Uh I wrote your name down.

27:18

>> You can just call me

27:18

>> Mr. Adams. Good evening. Good evening.

27:21

Thank you for being here. I don't have

27:22

any questions currently. Thank you.

27:25

>> All right, Councilwoman Ross.

27:27

>> Thank you so much, Councilman Rodriguez,

27:29

and good evening to you both. Um, for

27:31

me, this is uh I don't have many

27:33

questions. I mean, anything that can

27:35

bring more revenue into the city, bring

27:37

it on. Um, we love it. I think the only

27:39

thing I want I'm a person who likes

27:41

things to look pretty and, um,

27:44

Harrisburg, we are going through a phase

27:46

where we're just trying to bring

27:48

ourselves up and, um, look good while we

27:50

do it. We're going through a

27:52

reconstruction phase and I think as the

27:55

capital, whatever makes us look that

27:58

what we are, which is the capital, I'm

28:00

for it. So, as you design, I would just

28:03

ask for something that is eye popping,

28:05

eyeopening, and something that's just

28:07

going to add extra flare to our city.

28:09

Um, but other than that, I'm I'm for

28:12

this. Um, I love it. Um, I would say

28:15

maybe for Harrisburg based businesses if

28:18

they get like a small discount, but if

28:21

not, that's okay. Just a suggestion. I'm

28:23

always looking out for Harrisburg. So,

28:25

anyway, but yes, just please make it

28:28

eye-catching, something that's going to

28:29

add to our city and not take away from

28:31

it.

28:32

>> I can do that one on Paxton Street will

28:34

look pretty nifty.

28:36

>> Okay. Thank you.

28:37

>> I can guarantee you that. All right.

28:39

>> That's all. No questions, just

28:40

suggestions. Thank you,

28:41

>> Madam President.

28:43

I don't have any questions. Thank you.

28:45

>> Right, Vice President Jones.

28:49

>> Good evening. Um, don't have any

28:50

questions. I share the sentiments with I

28:52

guess all of my colleagues. Um, you

28:55

know, I'm a big stickler for our city

28:57

being able to generate revenue. Um, you

29:00

know, over over the time this this can

29:01

be accumulating and hopefully you do get

29:03

those million two three million dollar

29:06

sales so we can get a little more. But

29:08

uh um I'll just say thank you for doing

29:10

business with the city of Harrisburg.

29:11

Well, thank you.

29:12

>> All right. Councilwoman Green,

29:15

>> thank you very much. I don't have any

29:17

questions regarding this.

29:18

>> All right. And Councilwoman Lawson,

29:21

>> thank you very much. I as a business

29:24

owner, I worked with Lamar and I don't

29:26

know, you said nine months. I've given

29:27

you guys a lot of like last minute um

29:30

changes and you you seem to make it. So,

29:32

I I think nine months will give you

29:34

plenty of time.

29:35

>> Okay. It usually takes me 18 to 21

29:37

months from start to finish. So, yeah,

29:39

I'm on a very short leash on this one,

29:41

>> right?

29:42

>> This one we got to move.

29:43

>> But, but I I definitely appreciate the

29:45

uh the idea of the revenue share. At

29:47

first, I looked at the lease and I

29:48

thought, okay, well, that's that's fine.

29:50

But, um, you know, again, when I worked

29:53

with Lamar, I knew sometimes that the

29:54

pricing was a little bit more than than

29:56

this. But, but giving us a revenue

29:57

share, I think, is extremely fair for

29:59

the city. Um, and I I appreciate that

30:02

being part of our contract as opposed to

30:04

just the straight um lease because, you

30:06

know, in good times you you'll benefit

30:09

the city a little bit more. So, um,

30:11

thank you. That's that's all I have.

30:13

>> All right. Thank you.

30:14

>> All right. Is there anything uh you or

30:16

Antonio would like to add?

30:19

>> I really am good. I just like I said,

30:21

we're we got to go. So,

30:23

>> all right. And speaking of e uh

30:25

economical and ecological stewardship, I

30:28

just mentioned Miss Muhammad as she

30:29

walked in and I see Ed. Uh so thank you

30:32

both for joining us as well this

30:33

evening. And um with that being said,

30:35

I'd like to add bill 4 of 2026,

30:38

resolution 10 of 2026 and resolution 11

30:41

of 2026 on the next agenda on our next

30:44

legislative agenda. And that concludes

30:45

the business of the public works

30:47

committee. Thank you.

30:49

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. We will

30:51

now move to the work of the

30:53

administration committee.

30:56

Our first piece of legislation for

30:58

discussion is bill two of 2026. Mr.

31:02

Trudale, could you please read it into

31:03

the record?

31:04

>> Bill two of 2026, an ordinance forgiving

31:07

and discharging 2024 and 2025 city real

31:10

estate taxes, including interest,

31:12

penalties, and cost and striking off tax

31:14

leans for certain historically taxexempt

31:16

properties.

31:20

Uh, thank you. Sorry. Okay. Um,

31:22

Solicitor Grover, do you mind providing

31:25

an overview or perspective from the

31:27

administration on bill 2 of 2026?

31:31

>> Certainly. This is, I think, the fourth

31:33

one of these that have come through. And

31:35

just to give an historical uh

31:37

perspective, in 2022 or three, uh

31:41

Dolphin County for the first time

31:42

required everyone who is taxexempt to

31:44

reertify uh and including the city and

31:48

and other agencies and the nonprofits. A

31:50

series of uh institutions, mostly small

31:54

churches, did not respond to that um and

31:57

therefore went onto the tax roles,

31:58

although they've always been exempt. and

32:00

the county has been very good about

32:02

tracking them down and getting them to

32:04

recognize they have to actually fill out

32:06

the exemption paperwork and get it

32:08

passed. As they get passed, we then uh

32:12

bring these forward to council to uh

32:13

basically forgive the taxes that were in

32:16

place because they they should have been

32:17

exempt but for their paperwork missing.

32:20

And uh so these are two more churches.

32:22

The one is uh uh

32:26

Mount Olive Baptist Church I believe is

32:28

the first one out on 14th Street. But

32:29

Tarsa prepared these and she's not here

32:31

tonight. She's the one who did the back

32:32

and forth with the county, but these are

32:34

we believe the last two um that they

32:37

have approved. I don't know if there's

32:38

any outstanding at this point. Um one of

32:40

them I think communicated that they were

32:42

uh no longer going to be functioning as

32:44

a church at all anyway and I think the

32:46

pastor had left the state who was

32:48

handling it. Um but these are the last

32:50

ones of that. So the school district and

32:52

the county have already forgiven these

32:53

taxes for these churches and we are uh

32:56

the last ones doing

32:59

Thank you.

33:02

I believe I did see the pastor of Mount

33:05

Olive. She was here. I'm not sure where

33:06

she went. Um, okay. So, I I I don't have

33:11

any questions. I'm pretty familiar with

33:14

this practice at this point. Um,

33:20

sorry. I'm just trying to determine the

33:22

other church. Is it agape? Does that

33:25

sound right to you?

33:27

I I don't know. We we we deal in partial

33:29

numbers when we're talking about taxes

33:30

at my office.

33:31

>> Okay.

33:32

>> Well, I believe that it is

33:35

>> Hold on. I

33:40

zoomed in too far.

33:45

>> Hold on.

33:46

Hold on. I want to be clear since we

33:49

named the other church. One moment.

34:02

believe it is Agape Tabernacle of Praise

34:06

and that's located at 1336 Green Street.

34:16

And hold on, there's one more address

34:19

listed. So I just want to make sure that

34:22

it's not the same.

34:26

>> It would be the same that we just would

34:27

have two parcels being put to a

34:32

nonprofit purpose which is religious

34:34

education or religious services.

34:36

>> Okay. So just for everyone's reference,

34:38

the 1336 Green Street parcel number and

34:42

1330 Green Street uh both belong to

34:47

Agape.

34:48

I don't have any questions. I'm going to

34:50

open the floor to my colleagues who may

34:52

have some additional questions. I'll

34:54

begin with Councilwoman Davis. Do you

34:56

have any questions regarding bill two of

34:59

20126?

35:00

>> Thank you, President Hill. I don't have

35:03

any questions. Thank you.

35:04

>> Okay. Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez.

35:07

Any questions on Bill Two?

35:08

>> Thank you, Madam President. No questions

35:10

for me. Thank you.

35:11

>> Okay. Thank you, Councilwoman Ros. Any

35:13

questions on bill two? No, no questions.

35:16

Just wanted to note it's for tax year

35:18

2023. I know we know that, but I wasn't

35:21

sure if the public did. Am I that's

35:23

correct for

35:24

>> No, it's actually discharging 24 and 25.

35:27

>> Okay.

35:28

>> Yeah. 23 is when they got the notice.

35:30

>> Gotcha.

35:31

>> Right. And then 24 25 they got taxed

35:33

because the paperwork wasn't filled out.

35:35

So that's what we're forgiving.

35:36

>> Well, thank you for correcting me. So

35:38

then it's still the public knows. I

35:41

>> Great. Thank you. No questions. Okay,

35:44

Vice President Jones, any questions on

35:46

Bill Two?

35:49

>> I don't know if this is a question. Um,

35:51

and I'm I'm very familiar with a lot of

35:54

the businesses or buildings, nonprofits,

35:58

501c3s, state buildings that are exempt

36:00

from our taxes. There was something

36:02

recently, you know, I went to uh the

36:05

meeting with the A and um I came across

36:07

some information that was very

36:09

eyeopening for me where we have at least

36:13

1640

36:15

properties that are tax exempt and over

36:18

a period of time

36:21

amounted equated to 1.5 with a B billion

36:27

dollars in revenue that we're not

36:29

getting. It's not revenue. It's a

36:31

>> tax. Yes.

36:33

>> Yes.

36:33

>> I apologize. I didn't mean to say it

36:35

like that.

36:37

>> We We'd be mounting a war against

36:38

>> Right. Right.

36:40

>> I didn't mean to say it like that, but

36:42

but you know, um and and and one of the

36:44

things that was put out there for a lot

36:46

of these uh exempt tax exempt entities

36:50

was um can you help, you know, donate

36:53

something for the city, you know, and

36:56

nobody gave a penny. So

37:00

my question would be

37:03

I know we're not rewriting law to start

37:05

taxing non-exemp uh you know tax exemp u

37:09

entities but you know how does this play

37:11

out for us moving forward with a lot of

37:13

these things and in this revitalization

37:16

period?

37:18

>> Well I'm not elected to anything so you

37:20

guys have to figure out how it plays

37:22

out. Um, but it's it's in the state

37:24

constitution. So, it's not it's it's it

37:26

would literally take a constitutional

37:28

change to change the the charitable uh

37:30

purposes. And some people can see very

37:32

easily and and it's I've been to I've

37:34

been to hearings up on the hill about

37:35

this where they've tried to discuss it.

37:37

There's a really big difference between

37:40

a local church, you know, who has a, you

37:42

know, maybe a daycare in there in the

37:44

day during the week and services a few

37:46

nights a week and on the weekends and a

37:49

billion dollar medical facility. They're

37:52

very different entities and they're

37:54

treated in Pennsylvania under the

37:55

Constitution exactly the same.

37:56

>> Okay.

37:57

>> Um and so um and then government

38:00

entities aren't taxed because taxpayers

38:02

don't pay one government tax to pay

38:05

another government tax.

38:06

>> Um so and I will note there are and I

38:09

don't know the number off the top of my

38:10

head because I haven't looked in a

38:11

while. We do have annual pilots with

38:13

quite a number of of nonprofits who do

38:16

every year they it's an agreement and

38:18

while they put it into an agreement,

38:20

it's not an enforceable agreement. It's

38:21

it's basically them agreeing in lie of

38:23

taxes they will pay us amount of money

38:26

because they know they use city.

38:27

>> Has that been happening?

38:28

>> Yeah, it's that's consistently happened.

38:30

There's not been a years where we

38:31

haven't done that. It's not a bunch of

38:33

them and maybe maybe 20

38:35

UPMC does it.

38:37

>> That's good because

38:38

>> Homeland does it, other ones do it

38:40

>> when the school district acts. And you

38:42

know, frankly, I think we got some of

38:43

the highest taxes taxes property school

38:46

district taxes in the 15 districts or

38:48

whatnot. But um yeah, I'm I'm glad to

38:52

know that somebody is doing something.

38:54

So not again that I was looking to tax

38:56

them. I know especially when it comes to

38:58

our churches, there are some of the

39:00

supposed to be some of the pillars or

39:02

backbones of especially the urban

39:04

communities. So yeah, that was just a

39:07

question I had. You know, that was just

39:08

some eyepopping numbers that I came

39:10

across and saw. So just thought I'd ask.

39:14

Um,

39:14

>> and I and I realize a lot of people do

39:16

talk about it's you gave a number the

39:18

percentages, but I think it's just over

39:20

50% is exempt within actual real estate

39:22

of the city. A huge chunk of that

39:24

obviously being the Commonwealth of

39:26

Pennsylvania.

39:26

>> Yeah.

39:27

>> At the same time, because we're here, we

39:29

may not be able to get some things. If

39:31

you look at all the grants and then the

39:34

what fire gets and all there is, they

39:35

and they've put a lot of money into the

39:37

city of Harrisburg. You know, could they

39:40

put more? Sure. But the reality is they

39:42

have put a lot. Frankly, they picked up

39:44

the burden when we dropped the ball when

39:46

they put us in receiverhip, you know,

39:48

because we didn't write a check for

39:49

that. You know, they hired entire teams

39:52

of people and spent millions and

39:53

millions and millions of dollars,

39:54

borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars

39:57

uh for the parking system. Um so, um

40:00

>> we need that back.

40:02

>> We we don't need the parking system.

40:03

>> N I'm talking about the money, but go

40:05

ahead.

40:06

>> But I'm just saying so so they are a

40:07

partner with the city. Um, you know,

40:09

it's always a bumpy relationship, but

40:11

you know, we're they have us and we have

40:13

them, and you know, so it's it's got to

40:15

be a working relationship uh for both

40:17

sides of it.

40:19

>> All right. Thank you. No further

40:20

questions.

40:22

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. Any

40:24

questions on Bill Two?

40:28

>> Thank you, President Hail. Uh, I will be

40:30

recusing myself from Bill Two as my aunt

40:32

is the pastor of Mount Olive Baptist

40:34

Church, so I don't have any comments.

40:36

>> Thank you. Uh, Councilman Lawson, any

40:40

questions on Bill Two?

40:42

>> Um, thank you, um,

40:45

uh, President, and and I don't have any

40:47

questions. I I just um will piggyback

40:51

with uh uh vice president here and and

40:54

and say that uh there are entities that

40:57

we could possibly try to incentivize to

41:01

to offer a a pilot as we look to um uh

41:05

revitalize the city, renew civic pride,

41:08

and and and I don't mean the small

41:10

churches, but I do mean some of the um

41:12

some of the other nonprofits that do

41:14

have that ability to to help um within

41:16

the city and and we'd we'd love to uh to

41:19

reach out to them and see how they we

41:20

can get them involved. But um oh, there

41:23

is one question. Uh Solicitor Grover,

41:26

you said that you believe that all of

41:28

the churches have responded or do you

41:30

think that there may be some that

41:32

probably need to get in touch with us

41:34

because of um uh this outstanding tax?

41:39

So, as far as I know from the

41:40

communication with the county, everyone

41:42

who is still functioning and it's still

41:44

a church and some were other things than

41:47

churches that were nonprofit

41:48

organizations. All of them, as far as I

41:50

know, have responded. Could there be a

41:52

straggler? I don't know. The notice of

41:54

your real estate going up for tax sale,

41:57

which takes three years. If they haven't

41:58

responded, they'll notice by next year,

42:01

right? And then they will be here if

42:03

there if anyone's missing. So,

42:05

>> Okay, great. And then um obviously the

42:08

county has provided a process for them

42:10

to uh to start that uh

42:12

>> it's a very simple process you can do it

42:14

any time. There's a form to fill out for

42:16

for when you are exempt other than like

42:18

a tax relief. You can only do it once

42:20

one time a year. Exemptions if you're

42:22

exempt um you you can come in at any

42:24

time and fill that paperwork out. Give

42:26

it to the county tax office. Uh and they

42:28

will they will work with you to get you

42:29

on a in front of a board to get a vote.

42:32

>> Okay. Great. Thank you very much. That's

42:34

everything.

42:35

Thank you. Um, if there are no further

42:38

questions, um, I would like to move to

42:41

add bill 2 of 2026 to our next

42:45

legislative session agenda for a formal

42:48

vote. Next, we have Bill 3 of 2026. Mr.

42:52

Trudale, could you please read it into

42:54

the record? Bill 3, 2026, an ordinance

42:57

amending chapter 2-301 of part three of

43:01

the administrative code regarding

43:02

department heads, appointments, and

43:04

duties and acting heads to update and

43:06

clarify provisions regarding such

43:08

appointments.

43:11

>> Thank you. Um, bill 3 of 2026

43:16

was a request of Harrisburg City

43:18

Council. Um, if you remember and if

43:21

you've been following along uh with our

43:25

lawsuit when the mayor sued us, there

43:27

were two pieces of legislation

43:30

um that were a part of the joint

43:33

stipulation

43:34

um with the court. Um so this is the

43:37

first. Um,

43:39

and what this one does is

43:44

we've kind of nicknamed it the 121st day

43:49

um, ordinance. So, um, as Mr. Trudell

43:54

noted in the caption, um,

43:59

we are amending the administrative code.

44:02

So that's part three of title two of the

44:05

codified ordinances of the city of

44:07

Harrisburg. Um are amended as follows.

44:10

Part three uh 2-300 the administrative

44:14

code chapter 2-301

44:17

entitled departments and bureaus

44:20

generally section 2-301.5

44:24

subsection C entitled department heads

44:28

appointment and duties acting heads. Uh,

44:31

the mayor may appoint an acting direct

44:33

department head, excuse me, for a time

44:36

period not to exceed 120 days unless the

44:39

appointment of such acting department

44:41

head has been subject to the advice and

44:45

consent of counsel. No individual may

44:48

serve, and this is where the amendment

44:51

comes, or be entitled to compensation,

44:55

now we're going back to the language, as

44:57

an acting department head for more than

45:01

120 days during a mayor's term of

45:04

office. This is additional amendment

45:06

language without the approval of the

45:09

council. Upon expiration of the 120day

45:13

acting appointment period, if such

45:16

individual has not been approved by the

45:19

council as department head or for an

45:22

extension of the 120day period, the

45:26

controller shall be prohibited from

45:29

approving or issuing any further

45:31

compensation associated with such

45:34

appointment. Nothing herein shall

45:37

prohibit the mayor and council from

45:40

authorizing an acting department head to

45:43

serve beyond

45:45

120 days as circumstances dictate.

45:50

So I just wanted to read that amendment

45:52

language. I don't know Solicitor Grover

45:55

if you have any comments um before I

45:57

open the floor uh for questions from my

46:00

colleagues. O only some context that's

46:03

beyond I think what most people think

46:06

about acting department heads. An acting

46:08

department head can be here because the

46:10

approved department head is on a lead

46:12

for some reason. So it's used for two

46:14

different purposes. Um and if you take

46:17

for example um if if the director of a

46:20

department themselves or their spouse

46:22

had a baby, they would be entitled to to

46:24

12 weeks uh of leave and their deputy

46:28

would be made acting. Right? That's

46:30

that's a different thing. But it's it so

46:33

it's sort of inter intertwined with

46:34

those two things. When when we're

46:36

talking about circumstances, that's the

46:38

kind of stuff you have to think about

46:39

because if the same family had two

46:41

babies in four years, that would be in a

46:43

mayor's term. You would you would be way

46:45

past 120 days. So that's where you kind

46:48

of have to take is a case-byase basis if

46:50

there's a reason someone is in that

46:52

acting role. And and and the obviously a

46:55

director is entitled to the family

46:56

medical leave. That that's the other

46:58

side there. So there's two. There's the

46:59

I am making you the head of the

47:00

department. But historically,

47:02

Harrisburg's had both of those things

47:03

over the many years.

47:07

>> Understood. But I think well, we know

47:10

that this transpired from the other side

47:13

of the of the coin, not from a

47:17

circumstantial situation.

47:19

>> I I I am not saying differently. I'm

47:21

just saying just for for what I think

47:23

the purpose of the statute was from its

47:25

beginning, it had multiple applications.

47:27

>> Sure, I hear you.

47:29

Um I don't have any questions. I know

47:31

that this is um we've anticipated this

47:35

ordinance along with one more resolution

47:39

um as a part again of the joint

47:42

stipulation. So I don't have any

47:43

questions. I will open the floor to my

47:45

colleagues who may have some questions.

47:48

Councilwoman Davis, do you have any

47:49

questions related to bill three?

47:52

>> Thank you. Coun uh President Hill. No, I

47:55

don't have any questions. It's pretty uh

47:58

clearcut. We've been going over this for

48:01

the last three weeks. So, it's pretty

48:04

clear what a department head is, how

48:08

long they can actually work in an acting

48:11

position, and then on the 121st day, if

48:18

council and the mayor agree that the uh

48:23

acting head stays in that position, then

48:26

they will be able to continue to work.

48:28

If not, the controller will not be

48:31

paying for the position

48:34

past 120 days. Thank you.

48:38

>> You're welcome. Councilman Rodriguez,

48:40

any questions on bill three?

48:42

>> Um, no questions for me. I've been

48:44

through the procedure with council as

48:46

it's unfolded throughout court and

48:48

currently, so I'm privy to this new

48:50

information and um just glad to see it

48:54

uh coming into fruition. So, nothing

48:55

else from me. Thank you. Thank you,

48:58

Councilwoman Ross. Any questions on Bill

49:00

three?

49:01

>> No, I do not have any questions on Bill

49:02

Three. Thank you.

49:04

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Any

49:06

questions on Bill three?

49:08

>> No questions, just more of a comment.

49:10

Um, again, I'd like to thank all my

49:12

colleagues for coming together on this

49:15

and making sure that we were able to um

49:17

get this on the agenda. And actually,

49:20

it's not this is not new. This is

49:23

something that was there. This is more

49:24

about the compliance of that 120day

49:27

rule. Um, and I think, you know, this

49:30

was a good thing that we were able to

49:33

get it into in this form that so that

49:35

it's clearly understood by not only us

49:37

but also um any future council members

49:40

and any future administrations. Um, this

49:42

is a a big step in the right direction

49:45

for us as a whole. I think again one of

49:48

the things I think we got out of this

49:49

was putting to bed old practices from

49:53

previous uh administrations and anyone

49:55

that else looks to maintain these

49:57

positions. I think this is uh very good

49:59

clut and clear and we're going to stand

50:02

on this one. That's it.

50:05

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. Any

50:07

questions on bill three?

50:10

>> Thank you. Uh I don't have any questions

50:12

regarding this. Um, I think it's it's

50:14

pretty simple um and straightforward. I

50:16

think it's a ne necessary trigger

50:18

mechanism uh due to recent events. So,

50:20

I'm just glad we've got it on the books.

50:23

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. Any

50:26

questions on bill three?

50:28

>> Thank you, President Hill. No, no

50:30

questions. just glad that we were able

50:32

to um close this uh which was a a bit of

50:37

a loophole, but that now we can um

50:41

clarify the process and and make it

50:44

easier for everyone as as Vice President

50:48

Jones said to to follow that procedure

50:50

and um you know do their job. So we

50:53

appreciate this.

50:55

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones.

50:57

>> Yeah, just one one last comment. Not

50:59

only do I thank my council, I can't

51:01

leave the administration, uh, Mayor

51:02

Williams, uh, you know, for agreeing to

51:05

these things. Um, that was a that's big

51:07

and it's another step for us, um, as

51:09

council and the administration to work

51:12

together, being on the same page to help

51:14

move our city forward. I think this is

51:16

big for both for both of us, for all of

51:18

us and city residents. So, I just wanted

51:20

to make sure we made sure we gave the

51:21

administration uh, acknowledgement is

51:24

this as well.

51:26

>> Thank you. Um, if there's no further

51:28

discussion on bill 3 of 2026,

51:32

I move to add bill 3 of 2026 to our next

51:36

legislative session agenda for a formal

51:39

vote. Next, we have resolution 12 of

51:42

2026,

51:44

resolution 13 of 2026, and resolution 14

51:49

of 2026. Mr. Trudale, could you please

51:52

read them into the record? Resolution 12

51:55

of 2026, a resolution authorizing the

51:57

city of Harrisburg to negotiate and

51:59

enter into a lease agreement with Lamar

52:01

Advantage GP Company LLC for the purpose

52:04

of maintaining an existing billboard on

52:06

a portion of city property located along

52:09

South Cameron Street north of the

52:10

intersection on Magnolia Street.

52:13

Resolution 13, 2026, a resolution

52:16

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

52:18

negotiate and enter into a lease

52:19

agreement with Lamar Advantage GP

52:22

Company LLC for the purpose of

52:24

maintaining an existing billboard on a

52:26

portion of city property located along

52:28

South Cameron Street south of the

52:30

intersection of Magnolia Street.

52:32

Resolution 14, 2026, a resolution

52:35

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

52:37

negotiate and enter into a lease

52:38

agreement with Lamar Advantage GP

52:40

Company LLC for the purpose of

52:43

maintaining an existing billboard on a

52:45

portion of city property located along

52:47

South Cameron Street near the

52:48

intersection of Elliot Street.

52:51

>> Thank you.

52:54

Okay, so I wanted to to tackle these

52:57

together. if we could start with

52:59

resolution 12 and resolution 13 since

53:02

they both involve um intersections of

53:06

Magnolia Street.

53:08

>> Yep. Um it's nice seeing everyone again.

53:11

Um effectively uh the biggest difference

53:14

uh from the previous contracts is um

53:16

these are signs that are already built

53:18

um and are currently on um the location

53:22

on Cameron Street. Uh so the the new

53:25

agreement here uh is taking over from a

53:28

from a previous agreement made back in

53:30

2007. Um it is now we're updating it so

53:33

that it's 15 years in length. Uh the

53:36

starting rent is uh

53:39

hold on to my sheet.

53:45

Starting rent is $1,200

53:48

per year or $100 monthly. uh that will

53:51

go through uh until 2031, so year six.

53:55

Um and that's when it'll go up to $1,800

53:58

per year or $150 monthly. Um and that'll

54:01

be the rate for the remainder of the

54:02

contract. Um and then after 2041

54:06

and onwards, uh we either can

54:08

renegotiate or it'll just continue year

54:10

to year at $1,800 uh per year at that

54:13

point.

54:14

Otherwise, the contracts are effectively

54:17

the same as the other ones.

54:19

>> Thank you. Um, I don't have any

54:21

questions. I'm going to open the floor

54:23

to my colleagues. Um, I'd like to begin

54:25

with Councilman Lawson. Do you have any

54:27

questions related to resolutions 12 and

54:31

13?

54:32

>> No questions. Thank you.

54:34

>> Thank you. Councilwoman Green, do you

54:37

have any questions related to

54:38

resolutions 12 and 13?

54:42

>> No, I don't have any questions.

54:43

>> Thank you. Vice President Jones, any

54:46

questions regarding resolutions 12 and

54:49

13?

54:50

>> No questions. Thank you.

54:51

>> Thank you.

54:53

Councilwoman Ross, any questions? Oh,

54:56

good evening again. Uh, no president

54:58

here. I don't have any questions. Thank

54:59

you.

54:59

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

55:02

questions?

55:02

>> Thank you, Madam President. I just

55:04

wanted to commend Antonio for the great

55:06

work he's done jumping in in lie of uh

55:08

not having a BA any longer. Not only has

55:10

he been productive in showing up and

55:12

speaking, he's just been able to answer

55:14

a lot of questions that, you know, we've

55:16

turned to him for, but it I think these

55:18

resolutions um are a testament to like

55:20

the aesthetics of the city moving

55:22

forward. Uh really rejuvenate it, giving

55:24

it that, you know, pop that we're

55:25

looking for, especially with all the new

55:27

construction, especially.

55:37

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Do you

55:39

have any questions?

55:40

>> Thank you, President Hill. No questions

55:42

for me. Thank you.

55:44

>> Thank you. Thank you, Antonio. Let's

55:47

move to resolution 14 of 2026.

55:52

>> Okay. Um, this is the same exact uh

55:55

agreements essentially that I just read

55:57

out with the same rates of 1,200 and

55:59

moving up to 1,800. Um, effectively the

56:02

only difference is it's further down

56:03

Cameron Street. It's closer to the um uh

56:06

the Elliot Street. uh like ramp there

56:09

instead of near the Magnolia Street. Uh

56:12

but effectively it is the same contract.

56:16

>> Okay. Thank you. Um again, I don't have

56:20

any questions. I'll open the floor. I'll

56:22

begin with Councilwoman Davis. Do you

56:24

have any questions?

56:26

>> No questions.

56:27

>> Thank you. Councilman Rodriguez, any

56:29

questions?

56:29

>> Thank you, Madam President. Nothing for

56:30

me. Thank you.

56:31

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

56:32

>> No questions for me. Thank you.

56:34

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones.

56:36

>> No questions. Thank you, Councilwoman

56:39

Green.

56:41

>> No questions. Thank you.

56:42

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson.

56:44

>> No questions. Thanks.

56:46

>> Thank you. Thank you. I move to add

56:48

resolution 12 of 2026,

56:52

resolution 13 of 2026, and resolution 14

56:56

of 2026 to our next legislative session

57:00

agenda for formal votes. Our final

57:04

resolution for discussion this evening

57:06

is resolution 15 of 2026. Mr. Trudeale,

57:11

could you please read it into the

57:12

record?

57:13

>> Resolution 15 2026, a resolution

57:16

ratifying and approving the 2026 2028

57:20

basic labor agreement between the city

57:21

of Harrisburg and local 521 American

57:24

Federation of State, County, and

57:26

Municipal Employees. Council 13.

57:30

>> Thank you.

57:31

Um I believe we are joined

57:35

>> uh we have Jack Dean who is the city's

57:37

labor council who was negotiated on

57:38

behalf of the city online.

57:41

>> Thank you.

57:43

>> Good evening.

57:45

>> Good evening. And I want to thank you.

57:48

Can everyone hear me?

57:49

>> Yes.

57:50

>> Yes, we can hear you

57:52

>> for accommodating me by Zoom. I sort of

57:54

got iced in today when I was in

57:57

northeastern Pennsylvania. So, I do want

57:59

to thank you for your courtesies and

58:00

allowing me to participate remotely.

58:03

>> Uh, as most of you have know, uh, we

58:06

have served as labor council for the

58:08

city of Harrisburg, uh, for the last 10

58:12

plus years. Uh I am pleased to inform

58:15

you tonight that over the last year uh

58:19

over multiple meetings with ABSME

58:22

starting on May 15th through the summer

58:26

uh culminating on February 5th we were

58:29

able to successfully negotiate a

58:32

tenative agreement with the over 170

58:35

member ABSME union. Uh the negotiations

58:40

uh were professional and collegial on

58:43

both sides. It was a pleasure de dealing

58:46

with uh ABSME and your employees and

58:50

after much back and forth uh we were

58:53

able to reach a tenative agreement and I

58:55

have

58:58

highlighted and I'll highlight the

59:01

substantive terms of this agreement for

59:03

your consideration.

59:05

uh keeping in mind that there's a lot a

59:08

lot of the back and forth was just

59:11

language cleanup. For example, ABSME

59:13

changed their their their district

59:15

number. So, we had to go through and

59:16

make sure that was all correct. Uh there

59:19

was some language in there that no

59:21

longer applies. So, we all agreed that's

59:24

that was extraneous. So, we agreed to

59:25

strike it. Uh but as to the substantive

59:28

matters, there really are only four uh

59:33

substantive matters. The first is it's a

59:36

three-year proposed deal, 2026 to 2028.

59:41

Uh we're already into 2026,

59:44

so we had to consider uh uh we wanted to

59:48

make sure that these valued employees

59:51

didn't go very long without a raise. So

59:55

the other substantive provisions are

59:57

article 9 holidays. We have agreed to

1:00:00

add another holiday to their uh uh uh uh

1:00:06

CBA which I believe they were receiving

1:00:08

anyway. It just wasn't uh officially in

1:00:11

the CBA. We decided to add it and that's

1:00:14

Junth. So they will have Junth as an

1:00:17

official city holiday starting this year

1:00:20

if this contract is ratified. Uh the

1:00:24

second article that's substantive is the

1:00:26

big one obviously wages.

1:00:29

It's article 15 section one.

1:00:32

The wages that we offered for three-year

1:00:35

deal were for year 1 2026

1:00:39

20 4%.

1:00:41

We agreed for this offer that that 4%

1:00:43

will be retroactive to January 1st. So,

1:00:47

if this contract is ratified, in

1:00:50

addition to the employees wage of

1:00:53

paycheck going up by 4% on their hourly

1:00:56

rate, they'll also get a a one-time

1:00:59

check of whatever that 4% is for the

1:01:02

last month, month and a half. We also

1:01:06

agreed to give the employees and they

1:01:08

agreed to a one-time $1,000

1:01:12

signing bonus. Uh in the last contract,

1:01:15

there were other bonuses associated with

1:01:17

it, but we had ARPA money at that time

1:01:20

and COVID money. Uh that money uh is all

1:01:23

allocated right now. So, the employees

1:01:25

agreed to a one-time $1,000

1:01:29

essentially sign on bonus for every

1:01:31

employee in the bargaining unit. There

1:01:33

are about 170 employees in the

1:01:35

bargaining unit.

1:01:37

>> Year two of the contract 2027,

1:01:40

the employees will receive a 3% raise.

1:01:43

Year

1:01:45

four, year three of the contract 2028,

1:01:47

the employees will see receive a 3%

1:01:49

raise. So it's four, three, and three

1:01:52

with a onetime $1,000 signup bonus.

1:01:56

There are no other bonuses associated

1:01:57

with this contract.

1:02:00

The final substantive provision is just

1:02:02

a continuation

1:02:04

of article 20, the reimbursement for

1:02:09

Medicare supplement payments for our

1:02:11

retired employees who receive health

1:02:13

care or who have Medicare supplement

1:02:16

insurance. For traditionally for the

1:02:18

last 10 years, that's been increasing by

1:02:21

$10 a year. We can we agreed to continue

1:02:24

to increase it by $10 per year. So by

1:02:28

the end of the contract, Medicare

1:02:30

supplement receiving retirees will

1:02:32

receive $370

1:02:35

uh to uh towards their Medicare

1:02:38

supplement.

1:02:39

We also agreed it's not it's not a

1:02:42

substantive change. There is a rule of

1:02:44

80 requirement for retirement which

1:02:47

means that if you receive uh if you're

1:02:50

80 which means age plus years of

1:02:53

service. So, if I'm 65, I have 15 years

1:02:56

of service, the rule of 80 will allow me

1:02:58

to retire and get my normal retirement

1:03:01

without penalty. Uh, that expired by its

1:03:06

own terms at the end of the last

1:03:08

contract, which was December 31st, 2025.

1:03:11

So, we agreed to keep the rule of 80 uh

1:03:14

in place

1:03:16

uh for the next contract. There are

1:03:19

again some substantive language cleanup

1:03:21

uh or non-substantive language cleanup

1:03:25

uh items, but everything was very

1:03:28

collegial. Uh the union voted and

1:03:30

ratified it. Uh and I'm here to answer

1:03:33

any questions on these proposed changes

1:03:36

uh that you may have.

1:03:39

>> Thank you very much. Um thank you for

1:03:42

the for highlighting um the four major

1:03:45

areas. I don't have any questions. Um, I

1:03:49

appreciated your overview. I will open

1:03:51

the floor to my colleagues who may have

1:03:53

some questions for you. Um, I'd like to

1:03:55

begin with

1:03:57

Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

1:03:59

questions?

1:04:00

>> Thank you, President Hill. No questions

1:04:02

for me at this time.

1:04:04

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez.

1:04:06

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh, good

1:04:08

evening. Thank you for joining us. Um my

1:04:10

question is relative to uh the union

1:04:14

actual negotiations. Um council uh we've

1:04:18

been trying to achieve something with a

1:04:20

few groups around the city, but uh I

1:04:23

know personally in the public works

1:04:24

department we've kept hitting kind of

1:04:26

blockades because we never wanted to

1:04:28

impede on negotiations.

1:04:30

How would I be able to perhaps get our

1:04:32

city clerk to arrange a meeting just so

1:04:35

I know um different ways we could step

1:04:37

around it without interfering with the

1:04:39

negotiations or uh contract theirs to be

1:04:43

>> arrange a meeting

1:04:44

>> uh the gentleman

1:04:46

>> yeah you're not

1:04:47

>> you can't

1:04:48

>> no you're not that's that's their labor

1:04:50

negotiation council

1:04:52

>> okay

1:04:54

so what I'm I guess what I'm trying to

1:04:56

get across is uh perhaps even being more

1:04:59

specific speific with the CEO um

1:05:01

situation. We've keep hit we've hit many

1:05:04

blockades where they're saying we

1:05:05

couldn't move forward because of the

1:05:07

union negotiations. So if we had people

1:05:10

from ask me here and we can't speak to

1:05:12

this gentleman, who do we speak to to

1:05:14

accomplish what we're trying to

1:05:15

accomplish?

1:05:16

>> Can you remind me what the CEO is?

1:05:17

>> So we were trying to organize a contract

1:05:20

for litter mitigation through a group

1:05:22

called CEO um to help uh end recetivism

1:05:25

and give second, you know, re-entrance

1:05:27

and opportunity. They said because it

1:05:30

may impede on uh you know ask me

1:05:32

negotiations, we wouldn't be able to

1:05:34

move forward.

1:05:35

>> Not just ask me negotiations, it's

1:05:37

literally by contract union work. That's

1:05:40

what

1:05:41

>> there is no union work where they're

1:05:42

cleaning up the street. So that's that's

1:05:45

the only part that was confusing.

1:05:46

>> I don't I'm confused. Think

1:05:48

>> we had a whole policy work session

1:05:50

around it. You were president.

1:05:51

>> Okay. But I'm still conf when you say

1:05:53

cleaning up the street. I guess we can

1:05:55

dive deeper into it just so there's no

1:05:57

tension on the floor. But you were in

1:05:59

attendance. We had a whole policy

1:06:00

session around it. I realiz CEO Miss Kia

1:06:03

Hanser was in attendance. I I

1:06:05

>> we actually had to ask me presidents and

1:06:06

other entities here

1:06:08

>> and what we kept being told was we

1:06:10

couldn't because it impedes on

1:06:11

negotiations.

1:06:12

>> It impedes on the contract. The contract

1:06:16

makes them the exclusive performers of

1:06:18

certain work.

1:06:19

>> I 100% understand that. But if that work

1:06:22

is not in the contract, how would that

1:06:23

be impeding? Like there's no there's no

1:06:26

work where they say litter control or

1:06:28

litter cleanup or litter mitigation is

1:06:30

done by an ASME employee. It doesn't

1:06:32

exist in the contract.

1:06:33

>> City labor on city property

1:06:36

>> including the streets is ASME's work.

1:06:40

>> Whether you have enough people to do it

1:06:41

is a different question.

1:06:42

>> It's nowhere in the contract though. But

1:06:44

that's why I said just to alleviate any

1:06:45

tension on the floor. Perhaps we could

1:06:46

continue the conversation.

1:06:47

>> We disagree with you that it's not in

1:06:49

the contract. We've we've looked it up.

1:06:51

>> Okay. But I respectfully disagree with

1:06:52

you that it's not in the contract.

1:06:54

>> That's interesting. I'd love to continue

1:06:56

the conversation.

1:06:58

>> Thank you.

1:06:58

>> But it's but the bottom line of who it

1:07:00

is, it's the mayor you have to work with

1:07:02

to get there. Like if they she would

1:07:04

work through asks me with their people,

1:07:07

but it's the mayor bringing in someone

1:07:09

else to do other work that is which

1:07:12

would trigger an ask me that you should

1:07:14

be paying us to do that work, not

1:07:16

someone else. But taking care of

1:07:19

basically public property is

1:07:20

>> well well not to interrupt but like you

1:07:21

said it's vague in your memory but we

1:07:23

did have a whole work session policy and

1:07:25

the answers we were getting at that time

1:07:26

completely different so I'd like to

1:07:28

revisit it if possible

1:07:29

>> sure

1:07:29

>> thank you

1:07:31

>> just for everyone's reference CEO is the

1:07:34

center for employment opportunities

1:07:36

um they provide immediate effective and

1:07:39

comprehensive employment services

1:07:41

exclusively to people recently released

1:07:43

from incarceration and they operate are

1:07:46

currently operating in 30 cities ities.

1:07:49

Um they're dedicated to ensuring that

1:07:51

justice impacted job seekers have

1:07:54

opportunities to achieve socioeconomic

1:07:56

mobility.

1:07:59

Councilwoman Ross, do you have any

1:08:01

questions related to resolution 15?

1:08:04

>> Um

1:08:05

uh I would say good evening first of

1:08:07

all. Thank you for um explaining this to

1:08:10

us a little bit more. Um I don't have

1:08:12

any questions really. I think just a

1:08:14

comment. I mean, I understand council's

1:08:16

duty um when it comes to uh ratifying um

1:08:21

contracts and I know we can't

1:08:23

particularly talk to the union um the

1:08:27

people within this union, the workers

1:08:28

who I think are so important. I just

1:08:31

hope that they are satisfied. I'm going

1:08:32

off of your word that they're satisfied

1:08:34

with this contract that you all did come

1:08:36

to an agreement. Um because it's not

1:08:38

something particularly that um they can

1:08:40

come in front of us and say yes, we

1:08:42

agree to this. I think um also being an

1:08:45

uh a union worker and under contract and

1:08:48

understanding that uh sometimes we don't

1:08:51

always agree with um the things that are

1:08:54

placed in front of us and there's a lot

1:08:57

of conversations

1:08:59

um and some sometimes people don't

1:09:01

always hear from the people who it

1:09:03

affects. So, I would just say I hope

1:09:05

that this is um a contract that those

1:09:09

the workers who this will affect

1:09:11

completely agree with this that's in

1:09:13

front of us. That's all I ask. And if if

1:09:15

it's not um going back to the drawing

1:09:18

table, but if this is something they

1:09:20

agree with and it's and it's here, then

1:09:21

I I hope it's something we're passing

1:09:23

that that's going to ultimately provide

1:09:26

um work life balance for them in great

1:09:28

work conditions. So, I guess that's my

1:09:30

only question statement, but not really

1:09:32

a question, just a statement.

1:09:35

>> Thank you.

1:09:35

>> I I could briefly respond uh is that we

1:09:39

we don't I don't come before council and

1:09:42

I have for the last 10 years. I don't

1:09:43

come before council until the entire

1:09:45

union votes to ratify the proposal.

1:09:49

Thank you for that reassurance because

1:09:51

you are who we speak with and see and

1:09:54

and know and and want to um get that

1:09:57

information from of knowing that we're

1:09:59

passing something that is um working for

1:10:02

the employees of this this city that we

1:10:04

do represent as well in that sense. So,

1:10:06

thank you for um answering my question

1:10:09

comment all in one. I appreciate it.

1:10:12

>> You're welcome. Thank you.

1:10:14

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Any

1:10:16

questions? Uh yeah, thank you. Um good

1:10:20

evening. Um thank you for uh talking

1:10:23

about this um agreement with um ask me

1:10:28

and you know one of my questions is um

1:10:34

looking at

1:10:36

the medical benefits

1:10:39

retirement

1:10:40

and um everything that's in place. you

1:10:42

know, I I know again being a distressed

1:10:45

city, I again I don't know if this is a

1:10:47

question for Anthony or this is

1:10:48

something for you. Um just making sure

1:10:52

again I it's obvious that you know the

1:10:54

um union workers must be you know

1:10:57

agreeable to this to these terms but my

1:11:00

my question would be on a monetary basis

1:11:03

looking at the increases the 4% 3% then

1:11:06

looking at retirement um are these

1:11:08

things sustainable for our city in this

1:11:11

condition financially right now?

1:11:13

Well, I I I could answer in just on

1:11:16

procedure

1:11:18

uh is that

1:11:21

we don't and and when I say we, I mean

1:11:25

myself because I'm the lead negotiator.

1:11:27

I don't I do not make a financial offer

1:11:32

uh unless I clear it through the

1:11:36

business office to understand that they

1:11:40

understand the financial impact whether

1:11:42

it's zero one two three or four or 5%

1:11:45

whatever the case may be. So in this

1:11:48

particular case, uh we ran the numbers,

1:11:52

compared them to where we were

1:11:54

previously, and for this three-year

1:11:57

contract, the business office determined

1:12:01

that that is sustainable for the next

1:12:03

three years. And this was including

1:12:06

analyzing tax revenue coming in, uh the

1:12:09

things that that business office does.

1:12:11

And by the way, I echo the comments on

1:12:13

Antonio that were made before.

1:12:16

He's doing a fantastic job. Whenever we

1:12:19

uh whenever we tried to crunch numbers,

1:12:22

he was prompt getting back to us, which

1:12:25

is the key to negotiations because I've

1:12:28

seen far too often in negotiations I've

1:12:31

been involved with where my team gets

1:12:34

excited and then they walk out of the

1:12:36

room and they didn't run the numbers and

1:12:38

they can't afford it. We don't do that

1:12:40

here. and Antonio is fantastic getting

1:12:44

the numbers in hand to us for every

1:12:46

negotiation session.

1:12:49

>> Yeah. Um thank you for that. And um the

1:12:51

question I'm asking is is is is a reason

1:12:54

you know just because council's not a

1:12:56

part of these negotiations. We're the

1:12:58

last ones to to get this and we you know

1:13:00

have to put our stamp of approval. Um

1:13:02

and then also for our residents so that

1:13:05

they understand uh what's happening

1:13:07

here. So that's the reason why I'm

1:13:08

asking the question in the public forum

1:13:10

to to make sure um again we just have to

1:13:13

watch what we're doing here uh with the

1:13:15

city's you know um revenue streams and

1:13:18

and again just making sure that it's

1:13:20

it's sustainable. Um but all the other

1:13:23

parts of the negotiations I'm pretty

1:13:25

sure that those um union members have

1:13:27

agreed upon it or or you wouldn't be

1:13:29

here right now. So um that was my

1:13:32

question um and I'll continue to just

1:13:34

keep an eye on that. So again, after the

1:13:37

three-year, I get I'm sure you'll be

1:13:38

back at the CBA table looking crunchy

1:13:41

numbers again. Correct.

1:13:44

>> I I would be back at it probably in in

1:13:46

the next month or so with we have a

1:13:48

couple other contracts on standing. So

1:13:51

>> all right, that's all I have. Thank you.

1:13:54

>> Thank you.

1:13:55

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. Any

1:13:58

questions?

1:14:00

>> Uh the couple of questions I had were

1:14:02

asked and answered, so I don't have any

1:14:03

questions. Thank you for all the hard

1:14:04

work to get this done.

1:14:06

>> Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

1:14:08

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. Any

1:14:11

questions?

1:14:12

>> Um, probably just one question. And

1:14:14

thank you very much for taking the time

1:14:16

and uh coming out and hopefully the the

1:14:18

roads are starting to become a little

1:14:20

better for you. Um,

1:14:21

>> I'll let you know in about 20 minutes

1:14:23

hopefully.

1:14:24

>> Sounds good. Um, just how how does this

1:14:27

contract reflect to the uh the contract

1:14:31

that we're replacing? Um, is do are we

1:14:33

looking at similar increases, similar

1:14:35

bonuses? Uh, I I know that we're adding

1:14:37

a uh an extra holiday.

1:14:41

>> We're adding an extra holiday obviously.

1:14:43

Uh, the raises are similar. Uh,

1:14:47

the the bonuses uh last contract it were

1:14:52

they weren't in the contract uh per se,

1:14:55

the bonuses because it was all

1:14:58

subsequent ARPA money. So there were mo

1:15:01

there was essentially memorandum of

1:15:04

understandings which are essentially

1:15:05

amendments to the contract which were

1:15:07

done uh to provide these employees with

1:15:10

some yearly bonuses but obviously as

1:15:13

stated uh that money has has uh expired.

1:15:17

So there will not be yearly bonuses this

1:15:19

year just a one-time bonus in this

1:15:21

contract. Naturally, uh uh should the

1:15:25

city have a windfall or another

1:15:29

uh uh uh

1:15:33

area of the federal government giving us

1:15:35

an infusion, the city can go back to any

1:15:39

bargaining unit and say, "Hey, we have

1:15:41

this infusion. It's designed for this."

1:15:43

And part of it can be given as a bonus,

1:15:45

but the bonuses are less because there's

1:15:47

only a one-time bonus in in this

1:15:49

contract.

1:15:51

And the unions obviously union is well

1:15:53

aware of that. I actually brought that

1:15:54

up at our August 9th meeting and they

1:15:57

they acknowledged it.

1:16:00

>> Okay.

1:16:01

>> And and the and the rate increase

1:16:02

annually in the one that expired

1:16:04

December 31st was 3% for each year of

1:16:07

that contract.

1:16:07

>> Okay. So the 3% is is something that

1:16:10

we're we're fairly consistent. Okay.

1:16:12

Great. So one year

1:16:14

>> we get a a bonus year essentially for

1:16:17

the first Historically what happened in

1:16:18

receiverhip is they got zeros

1:16:20

>> like all of them did for a while got

1:16:22

zeros which is a tough tough thing to

1:16:24

sign up for.

1:16:25

>> Correct.

1:16:26

>> All right. Thank you. I I'm I'm not

1:16:28

opposed just wanted to uh get a little

1:16:30

bit of history so that I had an idea of

1:16:32

if this if this is the norm or if this

1:16:34

is an outlier. So thank you very much.

1:16:37

>> You're welcome. Thank you for the

1:16:38

question.

1:16:39

>> Thank you. Um, if there are no further

1:16:41

questions, no further discussion, I move

1:16:44

to add resolution 15 of 2026 to our next

1:16:49

legislative session agenda for a formal

1:16:52

vote.

1:16:56

We will move forward with our meeting

1:16:58

agenda. Next, we have public comment.

1:17:00

Just a few housekeeping notes before we

1:17:02

begin. Please state your name and your

1:17:05

address for the meeting record. If you

1:17:07

don't feel comfortable sharing your

1:17:09

address, please share the vicinity in

1:17:11

which you live within the city. You will

1:17:13

have four minutes to share your

1:17:15

comments. Mr. Trudale has added a timer

1:17:18

to the screen for your reference.

1:17:21

And thank you. I will begin to my right.

1:17:24

Is there anyone that would like to offer

1:17:26

public comment?

1:17:35

>> Hello council. That's Ed Jerk, 1521

1:17:38

Second Street. I just want to comment on

1:17:40

the hotspot uh garbage cans. Uh thank

1:17:44

you for introducing this. Uh Councilman

1:17:46

Rodriguez Rodriguez did send me the bill

1:17:48

last whatever Friday after it got put on

1:17:51

the table or whatever for comments. And

1:17:52

so I sent it out to our friends of

1:17:54

midtown. I'm I'm the beautifification

1:17:56

chair of the Friends of Midtown. So I

1:17:58

sent it out to them and I just want to

1:17:59

read just some positive things. Uh Chris

1:18:02

Greenblat said, "Hey, thanks for

1:18:04

sharing. love the idea of hotspot

1:18:06

receptacles.

1:18:08

Andy Hughes, who's our vice president,

1:18:10

say, "Hey, this is great." Um, and then

1:18:12

I also sent it Ralph to uh Strong

1:18:16

Harrisburg. That's a informal group. And

1:18:18

give me one second. I got to pull up

1:18:20

Slack to

1:18:22

find all that. I don't know if you guys

1:18:24

are Slack users or not, but the Strong

1:18:26

Harrisburg group is a bunch of young,

1:18:28

smart people that are really interested

1:18:30

in the city. And if you if you're

1:18:32

interested in joining, I can send it to

1:18:33

you. Uh, so I sent the bill and and I

1:18:36

put all your comments in there, Ralph.

1:18:38

Uh, Joe Kavanaaugh said, "Hey, I'm for

1:18:41

this." He says, "I'm I am however

1:18:43

concerned that our public trash cans

1:18:45

aren't emptied frequently enough, and

1:18:47

currently I wonder if adding more cans

1:18:49

will affect that." Uh, Will Rose said,

1:18:52

"Um, who will be responsible for

1:18:54

identifying and placing the receptacles

1:18:56

outside the stores? I also would like

1:18:58

more information about when the existing

1:19:00

receptacles are emptied right now. Is

1:19:03

there a list of all the city- owned

1:19:04

receptacles? Are they emptied once a

1:19:06

week during trash collection on the

1:19:08

street in which they are located? How

1:19:11

about receptacles not located directly

1:19:13

on trash collection routes? Is there

1:19:15

increased collection during times of

1:19:17

hightra events? So, those are my

1:19:20

comments. All generally positive. You

1:19:22

know, we do litter cleanups once a month

1:19:24

or try to in the summer. Um, and

1:19:26

obviously we, you know, want our

1:19:28

neighborhood to look nice in the whole

1:19:30

city. So, just want to give those

1:19:31

comments. Thank you.

1:19:34

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

1:19:35

right that would like to offer public

1:19:37

comment?

1:19:47

Good evening everybody.

1:19:49

Uh real quick, uh my name is Joshua

1:19:51

Barker. I live in the uptown area of

1:19:54

Harrisburg.

1:19:56

Um real quick, uh I have a few programs

1:20:00

that I do every year. Uh I have a

1:20:03

nonprofit called uh the B shop Boys and

1:20:06

Girls Club. So um currently have a few

1:20:10

programs that we're doing um in March.

1:20:13

One of them being a program where we're

1:20:16

teaching families how to grow their own

1:20:19

food um within buckets,

1:20:24

uh grow bags, stuff like that. Um we

1:20:26

know it's

1:20:28

very important for us to have food um in

1:20:32

this time, you know, just tough for some

1:20:36

families to have food, healthy food,

1:20:38

fruits and vegetables and stuff like

1:20:40

that. So we're going to teach them pe

1:20:42

teach people how to um start with seeds

1:20:45

and stuff like that. Uh I'm very um

1:20:50

involved also with youth teaching them

1:20:53

um entrepreneurship and trades. So um

1:20:57

this month in March we'll be starting a

1:21:00

program um you know every summer I do a

1:21:04

program but this March I'll be starting

1:21:07

a program where teaching the kids

1:21:09

entrepreneurship and trades also. So um

1:21:12

you know I just want to keep everybody

1:21:15

posted. I'll have an exact date when we

1:21:18

start in March and inform you guys. Um,

1:21:20

so, you know, I think it's very

1:21:22

important now that we see uh

1:21:26

the school being destroyed over there,

1:21:29

um, that we keep everybody in the the

1:21:32

loop of teaching our children

1:21:35

entrepreneurship and trades. So, thank

1:21:38

you.

1:21:40

>> Thank you.

1:21:43

Is there anyone else to my right that

1:21:45

would like to offer public comment?

1:21:47

Okay, seeing and hearing no one, anyone

1:21:49

in the middle section.

1:21:56

Greetings, city council.

1:22:00

My name is Rafika Muhammed, resident of

1:22:02

Harrisburg, uptown Harrisburg. I got a

1:22:04

little list as I'm going be coming

1:22:06

around and feeling better. been down for

1:22:09

a while. Getting back into the swing of

1:22:11

things, there's something I do want to

1:22:12

bring up. Um, on my list here, I got air

1:22:16

quality, data centers, e-waste, and

1:22:20

urban heat island. All of that impacts

1:22:22

our community and our city and our

1:22:24

residents. But one main thing I really

1:22:26

want to talk about tonight is um farm

1:22:30

animals.

1:22:31

I know this comes up over and over and

1:22:33

over and it is in our codes and I I

1:22:35

pulled it up and I had a long

1:22:36

conversation with our police

1:22:37

commissioner. I want to say we're in 26

1:22:40

maybe in 24 uh talked to him in detail

1:22:43

about farm animals which he said that

1:22:45

this is something that he's really not a

1:22:48

lot familiar with but he does get a lot

1:22:50

of calls about farm animals.

1:22:53

So I do know a lot of people want to

1:22:55

have chickens and do things and I get

1:22:57

it, trust me. But if we don't have

1:22:59

60,000 square feet of land,

1:23:03

we can't raise chickens. We can't raise

1:23:06

farm animals. And then after your first

1:23:08

animal, then it's an additional 20,000

1:23:12

square feet of land. We don't have that

1:23:15

capacity in the city. I think this is

1:23:17

something that the I would like council

1:23:19

to reook at as far as ordinances.

1:23:22

Um,

1:23:24

and we might have to go after people's

1:23:26

pockets because farm animals do run

1:23:28

around. My concern in dealing with uh

1:23:31

food and dealing with food for decades

1:23:35

is when we're talking about dealing with

1:23:36

chickens and then we talk about

1:23:38

influenza, people do not get the

1:23:40

connection. Um, I've heard this over the

1:23:43

years and have spoken publicly about,

1:23:44

okay, what are you going to do with

1:23:45

those chickens if something happens to

1:23:47

them? How do you properly dispose them?

1:23:49

who's going to be responsible for the

1:23:51

veterary costs and etc etc. See a lot of

1:23:53

people want to do things and they do

1:23:55

want to put it back on a city and that's

1:23:56

not our responsibility

1:23:58

and we don't get any answers. So that's

1:24:01

just something I feel that I really

1:24:03

would like for y'all to really look into

1:24:04

look at. I have seen pigs run down

1:24:07

Jefferson Street.

1:24:09

I have seen roosters and I'm in Uptown

1:24:11

Harrisburg. And I do think a lot of it

1:24:14

could be because we do have immigrants.

1:24:15

I don't have nothing against nobody.

1:24:17

Nowhere. No way. No shape. know how, but

1:24:20

once they come into our communities,

1:24:22

they're still leaving from a home that

1:24:24

maybe they could do those things. So,

1:24:26

again, education really needs to come

1:24:28

into play. So, I wanted to share that

1:24:30

real quick with you. Also, I'm a little

1:24:32

concerned and was a little upset when I

1:24:33

read about a data center today coming in

1:24:35

Dolphin County. Um, we all need to be

1:24:40

aware about these data centers. Um,

1:24:42

everybody's in this AI thing, AI, AI.

1:24:45

And um I know I my electric bill is

1:24:48

going up and I'm buying generators. I'm

1:24:50

trying to take my house off the grid.

1:24:51

I'm being very serious. There is no way

1:24:54

that we're going to be able to pay four

1:24:56

and $500 light bills. It's not going to

1:24:59

happen. We're going to have people that

1:25:01

will just cut off their and then we

1:25:03

that'll be another issue that we're

1:25:04

dealing with the city. So again, we need

1:25:06

to come up with some some information

1:25:08

education and I do know at our county

1:25:11

meetings there is someone that comes and

1:25:13

talks about these data centers. cuz I

1:25:14

know one of the golf if I'm not mistaken

1:25:16

one of the golf places in our county is

1:25:19

being sold for a data center and that's

1:25:21

that's very very bad. Um we're not going

1:25:23

to have water

1:25:25

or air. Um but we love AI and we don't

1:25:29

understand how these are connected and

1:25:31

what that means. So if you're concerned

1:25:33

again about the planet, if you're

1:25:35

concerned about your water and air and

1:25:36

you like AI, I would say use AI in

1:25:39

moderation

1:25:41

only when you need it. It's not Google

1:25:45

and I'm not concerned about money as far

1:25:47

as this is income, but it's hurting us

1:25:50

in the process.

1:25:52

When we talk about uh heat islands,

1:25:55

I'll come back and talk about that and

1:25:57

e-waste. Ralph, I want to talk to you

1:25:59

about getting together on some sites

1:26:00

throughout the city. March, April, and

1:26:02

May. I'm going to start now, but

1:26:05

consistently how we can keep our e-waste

1:26:07

out of our community, off the streets.

1:26:09

The city does not take e-waste, but we

1:26:12

can have something that we can work

1:26:13

together. This is not no labor thing, so

1:26:14

I'm not going to put that I'm doing

1:26:16

this.

1:26:17

>> Thank you very

1:26:18

>> working with some stuff.

1:26:19

>> So, thank you.

1:26:22

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else in the

1:26:23

middle section that would like to offer

1:26:25

public comment?

1:26:29

>> Good evening, council members. Kia

1:26:30

Fowler, North Fifth Street. Um, first

1:26:33

couple of shoutouts to I believe his

1:26:35

name is Mr. Lamar. Um,

1:26:39

No, no. This one, this one's actually

1:26:40

really good. He was speaking with a

1:26:42

member of the public prior to this

1:26:43

meeting beginning. I'm sorry. I don't

1:26:45

>> I believe he's in connection with Lamar,

1:26:48

but um he was speaking with a member of

1:26:49

the public who had some concerns about

1:26:50

the impact of some of the billboards on

1:26:52

her local community, and he immediately

1:26:54

said, "Here's my card. I'd love to have

1:26:56

discussions with your neighborhood." So,

1:26:58

it's really nice to see a contractor um

1:27:00

really trying to integrate themselves

1:27:02

into the neighborhood like that instead

1:27:03

of just saying, "We're coming in dealing

1:27:04

with it."

1:27:05

Um, number two would be

1:27:09

the council generally does this, but

1:27:10

tonight I observed Councilwoman RWS and

1:27:12

Councilman Jones trying to really

1:27:14

emphasize the point that the public

1:27:16

understood what's being said, what's the

1:27:18

meaning of some of these proposed

1:27:19

ordinances, what is the context behind

1:27:21

them, what are the implications of it

1:27:23

for those who might not be as familiar

1:27:25

with technical jargon or whatever it may

1:27:28

be. So, I really appreciate your

1:27:29

consistency in trying to make sure the

1:27:31

public understands what's being

1:27:32

discussed and what's happening. Third

1:27:35

question regarding the uh 120day

1:27:38

proposed change. Maybe I didn't hear

1:27:41

this when I was listening to it. Um I

1:27:44

understood that if 120 days elapses

1:27:47

while the mayor is still in their

1:27:49

current term, then that interim

1:27:51

department head must cease being paid

1:27:54

and or cease being in that position.

1:27:56

What happens if, say, 80 days elapses,

1:27:59

the mayor's term ends, the mayor's

1:28:01

reelected, can that department head stay

1:28:03

in for another 120 days? Does that kind

1:28:05

of violate the intention of the act?

1:28:10

We normally don't respond, but um no.

1:28:15

So, well, I don't want to speak to

1:28:18

circumstantial

1:28:19

situations, right? So, but the answer

1:28:22

would be no. It would it it should be

1:28:25

one individual or appointment per term.

1:28:27

>> Okay. Thank you. That's why I spent some

1:28:29

time in model UN in high school and so

1:28:30

understanding that commas and periods

1:28:32

can be used and abused by people looking

1:28:35

to do that. Um third would be coming

1:28:38

before you again as always to discuss

1:28:39

some of the um impacts I'd like to see

1:28:42

of especially really bill one and

1:28:43

amendments like to see to bill one. I've

1:28:45

spoken a couple times with several

1:28:47

council members about trying to require

1:28:50

all law enforcement, local, state, and

1:28:51

federal, to visibly identify themselves.

1:28:54

Um, if they have badges, visibly display

1:28:56

badges, vis visibly display agency

1:28:58

affiliation. I know Pennsylvania already

1:29:00

has a law requiring all of their

1:29:01

officers to have identification upon

1:29:04

request. Um, in a lot of instances,

1:29:06

visibly display their agency

1:29:08

affiliation. I would love to see

1:29:09

Harrisburg pass just a blanket all law

1:29:12

enforcement must display. Obviously,

1:29:14

there's things like SWAT that have to be

1:29:15

accepted, but in all other general

1:29:18

cases, um identification must be visibly

1:29:22

given, must be visibly seen, as well as

1:29:23

agency affiliation. I know in DC, law

1:29:26

officers must provide their um

1:29:28

information in writing upon request. Uh

1:29:30

I think that would be really neat to see

1:29:32

here as well. I know I have less than a

1:29:34

minute. Um

1:29:36

I do have some I'm not going to read

1:29:37

them now, but uh I may email them to you

1:29:39

later. Just some examples of other

1:29:41

states that have passed

1:29:43

um legislation about identification. Um

1:29:48

I had a conversation a while ago with

1:29:50

Councilman Jones about not being able to

1:29:53

ban masks. I know that 23 states do

1:29:56

currently ban masks in some capacities

1:29:58

such as one may not wear certain face

1:30:00

coverings in commission of a crime. Um

1:30:03

and so I would be interested if anyone

1:30:05

has more knowledge on that than I do

1:30:06

about having a more nuanced discussion

1:30:08

so I can kind of understand where some

1:30:10

of these thought patterns are. Thank

1:30:11

you.

1:30:14

Thank you. Is there anyone to my left

1:30:16

that would like to offer public comment?

1:30:30

>> Good evening, Council Libby Profit,

1:30:33

2000 block of Chestnut Street. um

1:30:37

about those billboards. It'll be nice if

1:30:40

the vacant billboards are publicized for

1:30:43

the local community that individuals

1:30:46

that want to use it can lease it because

1:30:48

for $1,000 a year,

1:30:52

those are some great prices. I've been

1:30:55

looking at marketing and um if you guys

1:30:59

have Billboard and us if we can get it

1:31:02

for that price, huh, those are some

1:31:06

great prices.

1:31:08

Now, as far as the um I heard Miss

1:31:11

Muhammad mention something about

1:31:14

the grids,

1:31:16

the connection between

1:31:18

what the public utility commission is

1:31:20

doing. They had a hearing today about

1:31:22

it.

1:31:24

And it's important because

1:31:28

we are paying more because our energy is

1:31:32

being outsourced to Maryland and

1:31:35

Virginia. They're keeping it in data

1:31:37

banks over there and then they're

1:31:39

selling it back to us at a higher rate.

1:31:42

So it coming to the Dolphin County area

1:31:46

is a way that they're trying to balance

1:31:49

the cost. I think it'll be good for us

1:31:52

to bank some of our own her own energy.

1:31:56

I spoke to a senator today,

1:32:00

Senator, she's from the Lancaster area.

1:32:04

She was speaking about how

1:32:08

two of the companies in her area within

1:32:11

the last year lost over 100 employee

1:32:14

each that was

1:32:18

generating energy and how the cost of

1:32:22

them generating this energy

1:32:25

supersede what they could actually

1:32:28

afford. So she lost

1:32:32

jobs in her district because the price

1:32:34

of energy is going up. So I understand

1:32:38

there's environmental issues, but we

1:32:41

can't be producing all this energy

1:32:44

and having it bank in Maryland and

1:32:47

Virginia

1:32:49

while their energy cost is going down

1:32:52

and our energy in Pennsylvania cost is

1:32:55

going up.

1:32:56

So that is something I wanted to balance

1:33:00

and again thank you.

1:33:04

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

1:33:06

left that would like to offer public

1:33:07

comment? Okay, seeing and hearing no

1:33:10

one.

1:33:12

Councilwoman Raj, you had a number of

1:33:14

announcements you'd like to make.

1:33:17

>> Yes, I do. Good evening again,

1:33:18

everybody. I just wanted to make a few

1:33:20

announcements about some things

1:33:22

happening um this weekend and next week.

1:33:27

So this weekend, I'm sure we also the

1:33:29

press conference the administration made

1:33:31

on the ice and fire festival. So I just

1:33:33

wanted to remind everybody it's going to

1:33:35

be 70° on Saturday. So although the ice

1:33:39

may melt a little bit, I think it would

1:33:40

be a great time for us all to finally

1:33:42

get outside. Um the snow and the

1:33:45

freezing rain has definitely kept us

1:33:47

indoors long enough. So, that is going

1:33:49

to be um this weekend

1:33:52

um from 11:00 am to 7 pm. And I think

1:33:54

it's just a great way to get some foot

1:33:57

traffic in our city um and just have

1:33:59

some fun. So, I wanted to remind

1:34:01

everybody again about the fire and ice

1:34:04

um festival. Um it's going to be around

1:34:07

tier 10 North Second Street. Um but I

1:34:10

know there will also be I think a little

1:34:12

bit on Front Street too because I know

1:34:14

they have fire pits um and other

1:34:16

activities. So, um that it will sure to

1:34:19

be fun. I know it's fun. Every year I

1:34:20

take my kiddos down.

1:34:23

Um next week, um on Thursday, March the

1:34:27

12th, I'm going to announce this again

1:34:29

next Tuesday during our legislative

1:34:31

session, but I wanted to make sure um

1:34:33

residents could plan adequately. Um

1:34:36

there's going to be a town hall meeting

1:34:38

at uh for uh 15th and Vernon playground

1:34:42

um for some building um um concepts and

1:34:47

um for residents to give their ideas. So

1:34:50

that's Thursday, March 12th from 6:00 to

1:34:52

8:00 p.m. and it's going to be at the

1:34:55

Hamilton Health Center, which is uh 110

1:34:58

South 17th Street. So I hope to see

1:35:01

everybody out there. I've put it in my

1:35:02

calendar to um come and hear what

1:35:05

residents are requesting and asking for

1:35:08

and uh just to hear what uh the parks

1:35:10

and recreation and enrichment department

1:35:12

have planned for that playground. Also,

1:35:15

uh roller skating is back. Um I know

1:35:17

President Hill and I are enthused to see

1:35:20

roller skating coming. That was

1:35:21

something that we spoke about with the

1:35:23

administration and at the time it was

1:35:25

something that could not happen. Um, and

1:35:28

even though they went ahead and planned

1:35:29

it, um,

1:35:31

to have it, uh, I would say I'm just

1:35:34

really glad to see that it's happening,

1:35:36

even if, um, we weren't able to give any

1:35:37

more input on it. So, uh, roller skating

1:35:40

is back at City Island. Um, it's going

1:35:43

on Friday and Saturday night starting

1:35:46

March 7th through March 28th. Um,

1:35:49

there's Teen Tuesdays, which starts on

1:35:52

March 10th. um March 10th, March 17th,

1:35:56

and March 24th. And Teen Tuesdays are

1:35:59

from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Um this

1:36:02

roller skating will be going on at the

1:36:04

Carousel Pavilion on City Island, which

1:36:06

is right across from the carousel. Um

1:36:11

there it's from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

1:36:14

Adult skate is from 8:00 p.m. to 9:00

1:36:16

p.m. We love to see your adult moves. I

1:36:18

have no more, but I can roller skate

1:36:20

backwards. Um,

1:36:23

children 16 and under must be

1:36:25

accompanied by an adult.

1:36:28

Um, attendees seven attendees 17 and up

1:36:32

must provide ID for attendance. The

1:36:34

injury fee is $5. Skate rental is $2,

1:36:38

chips are a dollar and candy is $2. So,

1:36:41

um, I hope to see everybody out there. I

1:36:43

know it was fun when I took the kiddos

1:36:45

um, last year. So, those were just a few

1:36:46

of my announcements of what's coming up

1:36:48

and happening um, in the city. Thank

1:36:50

you.

1:36:52

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones.

1:36:54

>> Uh yes, thank you. Um so I just want to

1:36:56

put out to the public that uh the

1:36:58

National Coalition of 100 Black Women

1:37:01

Incorporated, the Harrisburg Chapter of

1:37:03

Public Policy is hosting enough is

1:37:07

enough. Gun Violence Demands Real

1:37:09

Solution. Um one of the uh keynote

1:37:11

speakers would be Dr. Sylvia C.

1:37:13

Washington. Um, this will be happening s

1:37:17

uh Saturday, March 28th from 12:00 noon

1:37:20

to 3:00 p.m. at the community charter

1:37:23

academy um one innovation way Harrisburg

1:37:27

PA17110.

1:37:29

Um again, I'll be making this

1:37:30

announcement up until that date. I think

1:37:33

this is something that um all of the

1:37:35

nonprofits, all of everyone that's

1:37:36

working out there with our youth,

1:37:39

something to get involved with. Um, I

1:37:41

think this is going to be a great

1:37:42

program coming to our area. Great

1:37:44

opportunity to network with other

1:37:46

individuals uh facing these same issues

1:37:48

in their communities. So again, that'll

1:37:51

be March 28th

1:37:53

uh Saturday, March 28th from 12:00 to 3

1:37:56

at the Commonwealth Charter Academy and

1:37:59

this again is hosted by

1:38:02

uh the 100 black women here at their

1:38:05

chapter here in Harrisburg. So thank

1:38:07

you.

1:38:09

>> Thank you. If there's no further

1:38:11

business, the time is 7:08 p.m. I will

1:38:14

entertain a motion to adjourn.

1:38:16

>> So move.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free