Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Work Session 3-4-2025

1:20:24EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
0:20

um the time is 5:31 p.m. I would like to

0:24

call our work session to order

0:32

Mr Parker could you please call the

0:46

role Miss

0:51

Daniels Miss Davis present Miss green

0:57

present Mr Jones here

1:01

Ms RS present Mr Rodriguez present misss

1:06

Bowers present thank

1:10

you we have quite a full agenda this

1:13

evening so I'll just get started with

1:16

the work of the administration committee

1:19

we have two bills and three resolutions

1:21

for discussion we will begin with Bill

1:24

one of

1:27

2025 Mr Parker could you please read it

1:30

into the

1:32

record

1:34

yes Bill one of

1:37

2025 an ordinance amending chapter 2-

1:41

515 citizens law enforcement advisory

1:44

committee of title two administrative

1:46

code to Grant City Council exclusive

1:49

appointment authority over the citizens

1:51

law enforcement advisory

1:55

committee thank you um before we open up

2:00

the floor to any questions my colleagues

2:02

may have I just wanted to refresh

2:04

everyone's memory a little bit um about

2:07

the citizens law enforcement advisory

2:13

committee so the Council of the city of

2:16

Harrisburg recognizes that the mission

2:18

of the Harrisburg Bureau of police is to

2:21

protect and serve the public with honor

2:23

integrity and professionalism the

2:25

council acknowledges the importance of

2:28

public accountability of the her B

2:30

Bureau of police as well as law

2:32

enforcement throughout our nation to

2:34

ensure that the constitutional rights

2:36

and freedoms of all people are

2:39

upheld the council further recognizes

2:42

that fostering a strong and Collective

2:44

relationship between law enforcement and

2:46

the community is essential in building

2:49

trust enhancing Public Safety and

2:52

ensuring effective policing the council

2:55

recognizes there is a significant

2:57

community community interest in

2:59

strengthening the relationship between

3:01

the Harrisburg Bureau of police and the

3:03

residents they serve and ensuring that

3:06

the bureau remains accountable to the

3:08

people of Harrisburg the council finds

3:11

that providing opportunities for ongoing

3:14

dialogue oversight and collaboration

3:16

between the community and law

3:18

enforcement will help build public

3:20

confidence in the bureau and support the

3:22

goal of a safer more unified City to

3:25

further these objectives the council

3:27

established the citizens law enforcement

3:30

advisory committee through Bill 8 of

3:33

2020 as an advisory body composed of

3:37

City residents dedicated to promoting

3:40

transparency accountability and trust

3:43

between the community and law

3:45

enforcement the council in its ongoing

3:48

efforts to provide clear and consistent

3:50

leadership in governmental appointments

3:53

has expressed a preference for the

3:55

council to have sole authority over such

3:58

appointments to ensure alignment with

4:00

its broader Public Safety and governance

4:03

priorities in light of this policy

4:05

approach the council has determined that

4:07

the appointment Authority for the

4:10

citizens law enforcement advisory

4:12

committee should reside exclusively with

4:14

the council which was previously shared

4:17

between the mayor and the

4:19

council so uh just to note

4:24

chapter we're amending the

4:27

administrative code um part five of

4:29

title two of the codified ordinances for

4:32

the city of Harrisburg is amended uh to

4:35

read part five

4:38

2-500 entitled boards committees

4:42

authorities chapter

4:44

2-

4:46

515 entitled citizens law enforcement

4:49

advisory committee subsection 2-

4:54

5157 is entitled original committee

4:58

appointments sub sub section A the

5:01

original committee shall be comprised of

5:04

seven members appointed by the city

5:09

council um each of whom must be

5:11

confirmed by a majority vote of the

5:13

council prior to being Seated on the

5:16

committee so if you remember

5:18

previously um the original committee was

5:22

comprised of five members appointed by

5:24

city council and two members um were

5:28

appointed by the mayor so this amendment

5:31

um would provide Council the opportunity

5:35

to

5:36

uh make seven appointments versus five

5:41

um if you also recall during previous

5:45

conversations um regarding the citizens

5:49

law enforcement advisory committee um we

5:52

have been waiting for the final two

5:54

appointments so if you remember all

5:57

seven uh policing districts within the

5:59

city of Harrisburg must be represented

6:02

on this particular board um and we had

6:05

two outstanding uh appointees uh which

6:09

were forly of the mayor um I don't have

6:13

any questions I think that um this

6:16

amendment um offers Council the

6:19

opportunity to uh make the board um

6:24

complete as well as it allows the board

6:28

to begin its work um that it could not

6:31

start uh or have any action occur

6:34

without all seven appointees so I don't

6:37

have any questions I am in support um of

6:41

Bill one of 2025 I will now open the

6:45

floor to my colleagues who may have

6:47

additional questions or comments I will

6:50

defer to our Public Safety Committee

6:53

chair councilman Jones Thank You

6:55

president bers uh yeah um I concur with

6:58

you um I believe that but um this has

7:01

been taking some time for this to happen

7:03

and I believe this is another yet

7:05

another opportunity for our residents to

7:09

uh repair or even build a relationship

7:13

with the police department so um and

7:15

then you know so they can really get an

7:17

in-depth idea of what's happening and

7:19

what uh the residents are seeing so you

7:22

know I too am in support and I hope that

7:24

you know um our colleagues are too and

7:26

that's all I have thank you thank you

7:28

councilman rri Ruez you served as our

7:31

former uh Public Safety Committee chair

7:35

do you have any questions or comments

7:36

related to Bill one of 2025 yes thank

7:40

you madam president um I just Echo the

7:42

sentiments of my colleagues to the fact

7:44

of we need to stop any attempt of a

7:47

tyrannical Association whether it's

7:49

government municipality non-associated

7:52

entity if there's an a mechanism of

7:55

accountability for any Authority I think

7:57

it stops and prevents them from to act

8:00

out of you know the proper uh procedures

8:03

and protocols um I myself had an

8:05

incident just in December um where I was

8:07

illegally pulled over and I feel as

8:09

though that mechanism needs to be there

8:11

for accountability plus if we ask our

8:14

residents to serve on boards and they

8:16

stand up to the test to fight and help

8:19

city council and help the city move

8:20

forward and then we say oh I'm sorry we

8:22

were just playing they showed up for the

8:24

meetings they showed up for the

8:25

appointments and then we just kind of

8:27

leave them out in the in the open I

8:28

think we open them a due diligence to

8:30

fight harder and it's been going on

8:32

since 2020 I just feel as though we're

8:34

doing the right thing but at least

8:36

trying to move this forward it's not

8:39

that we don't want to work with the

8:41

administration and making it happen it's

8:42

just we feel as though maybe this is one

8:44

thing we could take off of the plate of

8:46

the administration and assist with even

8:48

further so I don't want it to be looked

8:50

at as like a tug-of-war type of ordeal

8:52

we just feel as though we had great

8:54

people appointed um the board was nearly

8:56

finished and to wait numerous years just

8:59

just for one or two appointments I think

9:01

it's just a bit ludicrous at this point

9:03

and hopefully we can move this forward

9:04

and get this board appointed and have an

9:06

accountability measurement for the

9:07

residents if or when um any officers or

9:10

our law gets a little bit hellbent and

9:12

out of shape um that's really all I have

9:14

to say thank you thank you councilwoman

9:17

R any questions or comments thank you

9:19

president Bowers and good evening

9:21

everybody um I don't have any questions

9:24

um I'm in support of this I remember um

9:28

councilman rrig gu working diligently on

9:31

interviews on contacting members to be

9:34

on the cleak board I'm so I know we put

9:36

a lot of hard workor in it on this

9:39

project and it's time to move it forward

9:40

and also I believe vice president um

9:43

Asha green also took part and when it

9:46

first started up and she was part of

9:48

Public Safety so this has been a

9:50

long-going process and I I agree with

9:53

councilman Rodriguez it's not a a a tug

9:55

of war it's only hey you know let's get

9:57

this started the residents are looking

9:59

forward to it we they've already been

10:02

picked it's time for them to serve

10:03

they're ready and the community is ready

10:05

so we can continue to build the bridge

10:08

between the police department and the

10:09

residents and accountability and this is

10:11

a great step forward so I'm in full

10:14

support of it thank you vice president

10:18

green another former public safety

10:20

committee chair who was instrumental um

10:23

in the development of Bill 8 of

10:27

2020 do you have any question questions

10:29

or comments uh no questions just

10:31

comments um I agree with everyone else

10:33

um the time has come it's been come um

10:36

you know it's the reason why this this

10:38

came to fruition to begin with um even

10:40

before I let the charge for Bill 8 um

10:43

there was an effort to get this done

10:44

years before when uh councilman Johnson

10:47

and councilman Majors led the charge

10:49

originally um and it just wasn't able to

10:51

come together um in 20120 we really uh

10:54

made sure we got out there spoke with

10:56

the residents held Town Halls even

10:57

during the pandemic we did it virtually

10:59

we did it at parks uh just to make sure

11:01

we could get people's input uh we did

11:03

all that we got the input we got it

11:05

passed and then um for it still not to

11:08

be actually up and running um it just

11:11

doesn't serve the residents well so uh I

11:13

know that Council has made our

11:14

appointments I know the mayor um may

11:16

have had some issues finding people uh

11:18

that lived in those districts to fill it

11:19

so maybe with with our Outreach and our

11:22

resources um we can make those

11:24

appointments to make sure things get

11:25

done and we can continue to move forward

11:27

um I know one of the the parts of the

11:30

CSA program was supposed to be able to

11:31

work uh hand inand with cleak um and the

11:35

CSA program has went from a pilot to a

11:38

full-blown program to director after

11:40

director and and we still don't have

11:42

this up and running yet so I look

11:43

forward to getting this done um to make

11:45

sure that the the residents have that

11:47

input and that ability because it was

11:49

something that that they really wanted

11:50

and continue to want so um I just hope

11:52

everyone can support this so we can move

11:54

forward with it so thank

11:56

you thank you Council woman Davis any

12:00

questions or comments thank you

12:02

president Bowers no questions for

12:05

me okay thank you councilwoman Daniels

12:08

any questions or

12:10

comments no questions okay thank you um

12:15

I did want to

12:16

read uh the remainder of subsection

12:22

2-51

12:23

5.7 um subsection D reads that city

12:27

council shall make a request to City

12:30

neighborhood groups for recommendations

12:32

of qualified residents from their

12:35

neighborhood for appointment to the

12:37

committee uh subsection 2- 515.24h

12:46

[Music]

12:59

occurring on the committee and

13:02

subsection uh 2-51 5.8 subsection D Reed

13:08

City Council shall accept the

13:09

committee's recommendation or

13:12

recommendations or otherwise appoint

13:14

another eligible individual subject to a

13:18

majority vote of City Council in

13:21

accordance with the provisions of

13:22

chapter 2 uh section or Chapter

13:27

2-31 3 of the administrative

13:31

code believe those are all the amended

13:34

uh sections so I just wanted to read

13:36

those but if there are no further

13:39

questions or comments I move to add I'm

13:43

sorry president councilwoman Davis yes I

13:45

was just going to ask I guess there's no

13:47

one here from the uh Administration to

13:51

speak on

13:53

this this bill well the solicitor can

13:57

speak to it I guess from the administ 's

13:59

perspective but this bill was at was

14:03

drafted at our request if you would like

14:06

commentary I'm not sure if you have a

14:08

question for the solicitor No my only

14:10

point was that it's a council request so

14:12

there is no the administration doesn't

14:14

present on a council request thank you

14:16

for clarifying yes okay if there are no

14:21

further questions or comments anything

14:23

else councilwoman Davis okay um I moved

14:26

to add Bill one of 202 five to our next

14:30

legislative session agenda for a

14:33

vote next we have Bill two of 20125 Mr

14:38

Parker could you please read it into the

14:42

record Bill two of

14:45

2025 an ordinance for giving and

14:47

discharging 2024 city city real estate

14:52

taxes including interest penalties and

14:55

costs and striking off tax leans for

14:57

certain historically tax exempt

15:01

properties thank you um is there anyone

15:04

from the administration that will speak

15:06

to Bill two of

15:08

2025 so this request actually originates

15:11

out of the law Bureau based on our

15:13

meetings with the other taxing

15:15

authorities um dolin County at I guess

15:18

2023 did a re-registration for the first

15:21

time of every uh exempt property in the

15:24

Dolphin County a few of the churches

15:27

right now we know of three in the city a

15:29

bunch outside the city never turned in

15:30

their paperwork and then got a tax bill

15:33

having never got a tax bill they thought

15:35

it was just a mistake and didn't pay the

15:37

tax bill uh and then finally realized

15:39

they had to go in and deal with the

15:40

board the board was able to give them

15:42

each an exemption but they couldn't

15:43

forgive they don't have the ability to

15:45

forgive the prior year's taxes but it

15:47

really was just a paperwork era those

15:49

churches have all around the three of

15:50

them here for a very long time they

15:52

haven't always been the same

15:53

congregation but they've always been a

15:55

house of worship um and so they were

15:57

traditionally exempt Under Pennsylvania

15:59

Constitution and under under city code

16:01

so this is just this is a request to

16:03

exonerate those past due taxes because

16:06

um neither the mayor or the treasurer

16:07

can just give a blessing and wipe them

16:09

out so the school board as my

16:10

understanding has voted on at least two

16:12

of them and is agreeable with all three

16:14

I think the county has voted on all

16:15

three the Commissioners um and so we're

16:18

just basically in line with that um so

16:20

that they're currently all exempt they

16:22

just have a year of taxes that is deemed

16:24

passed due uh that um and I frankly

16:27

don't know whether they paid them and

16:28

and and appealed or haven't paid them

16:30

and appealed but it was just really from

16:32

the

16:33

administrative uh change in Direction at

16:35

the county that's

16:36

happened thank you for clarifying um I

16:39

don't have any other questions if the

16:42

school board and the Dolphin County

16:44

Commissioners have taken action guess

16:46

we're next in line um so I don't have

16:49

any other questions I'll defer to my

16:51

colleagues who may have some I'll begin

16:53

with our uh budget and finance committee

16:56

chair vice president green any questions

16:59

no I don't have any questions regarding

17:00

this thank you thank you councilwoman

17:02

Davis any questions no questions

17:05

president of ours thank you thank you

17:07

councilwoman Daniels any

17:11

questions yeah what's the value of of

17:15

that of of this

17:18

ordinance what's the dollar amount being

17:20

forgiven yeah actually I don't know I

17:23

didn't look it up because they shouldn't

17:24

have been taxed in the first place but I

17:26

can get you that information

17:29

and have any properties like paid tax

17:31

for 2024 that will have to be

17:34

refunded so if they've paid taxes

17:36

authorizer refunding I did not get into

17:38

the weeds because it was simply agreed

17:40

it was an error across the board um and

17:44

you know they they have emailed they

17:45

have called many people uh and have

17:47

presented already to the school board

17:49

and to the county uh board of appeals uh

17:53

and uh not surprising mostly like unlike

17:57

other developer type people their

17:59

appeals are all by volunteers helping

18:00

them trying to fix their problem and so

18:03

uh but I can get you the details on each

18:04

property what the tax bill that went out

18:06

was what the assessed value is and

18:08

whether they were paid or not um but

18:10

under Pennsylvania real estate law if

18:12

you have three years of non-real estate

18:14

taxes you go up for tax sale so you know

18:17

they they did their part and came in for

18:19

their exemption but they exemption can't

18:21

go back to the prior year it goes when

18:23

they apply so it left one year open in

18:27

question and is are all three properties

18:31

do all three belong to the same entity

18:33

or or is it three separate owners three

18:37

separate congregations nothing as I know

18:39

to even do with each other totally

18:40

different people contacted us on each of

18:43

them do we expect more of these requests

18:47

or do you think the problem has been

18:49

addressed systemically so we were just

18:52

on a call with the county tax Bureau

18:54

Representatives the County's tax lawyers

18:57

and the uh

19:00

um Board of assessment appeals people

19:03

there are a handful around the county

19:05

that still have not responded at all um

19:08

no two years in um they just haven't

19:11

filled out an exemption form they

19:12

haven't done anything I forget if you

19:14

said down to 36 of them around the

19:16

county that there's still an open

19:17

question so they're Pro they're being

19:19

proceeded with as if they are taxable at

19:21

the moment um so there could be another

19:24

that comes but these are the ones that

19:25

have been identified to date

19:29

you that's it for me thank you thank you

19:32

councilwoman RS any questions no I don't

19:35

have any questions but thank you

19:36

president Bowers thank you councilman

19:38

Rodriguez any questions um no this is

19:41

pretty standard in the nonprofit or

19:43

churches um type of world so uh thank

19:46

you for presenting Neil no questions

19:48

thank you councilman Jones any questions

19:51

um no um my concerns were same as um

19:55

councilwoman Daniel so thank you thank

19:58

you you if there are no further

20:01

questions or comments I move to add Bill

20:04

two of 2025 to our next legislative

20:08

session agenda for a vote next we have

20:12

resolution 12 of 20125 Mr Parker could

20:16

you please read it into the record yes

20:19

resolution 12 of

20:21

2025 a resolution authorizing the city

20:24

of Harrisburg to negotiate and enter

20:26

into a Professional Services agre

20:28

agreement with Conrad seagull

20:31

Incorporated to provide Actuarial

20:34

services to assist the city in

20:36

negotiations of certain collective

20:38

bargaining

20:40

agreements thank

20:44

you who will be representing the

20:47

administration for discussion of

20:49

resolution 12 of

20:51

2025 somehow I suspect that's me okay

20:54

solicitor Grover so uh on December 31st

20:59

2025 both the asme contract and the fop

21:02

contract expire in the course of making

21:06

an evaluating proposals back and forth

21:08

we need an actual orial service to

21:10

provide long-term analysis of those

21:13

numbers what what are the Legacy cost of

21:15

a of a proposal in either direction they

21:18

will make analysis of both ones that are

21:20

made and ones that are as as you're

21:23

going through a list of potential things

21:24

to figure out which one makes the best

21:26

sense so they're not they're not NE

21:29

they pre-decisional deliberation type of

21:31

things you present professional with a

21:33

series of potential options and they

21:34

give you how those numbers work um the

21:38

uh right now they are under contract to

21:40

give us OPB analysis for pension only

21:44

but this is to give them a a broader

21:46

scope it's not part of their current

21:47

contract to do this others and they have

21:49

done it for us in the past in other

21:51

contract

21:53

periods okay thank

21:56

you uh I don't have any questions

22:03

um no I don't have any questions the

22:06

hourly rate is

22:09

$325 per hour for the

22:14

services and and the services will

22:17

essentially be how much we give them

22:18

right like if you if you have to look at

22:20

12 options it's a whole lot more than

22:22

six options

22:24

so

22:26

okay I don't have any questions I'll

22:28

open the floor to my colleagues who may

22:30

have additional questions um I will

22:32

begin this time with councilwoman RWS

22:36

any

22:36

questions thank you president bars no

22:39

this was pretty much straightforward I

22:41

know this is a contract we've been

22:42

engaging with with the last bargaining

22:44

agreement so I'm fine thank you

22:48

councilman Rodriguez thank you Madame

22:51

President um solicitor Grover do you

22:53

know how far back the relationship spans

22:55

with the firm and the city I've been

22:58

here since 2014 and they were here

22:59

before I got here okay so I don't know

23:01

when it started okay I just was gazing

23:04

on their website and it seems like they

23:06

handled ourselves as well so I just

23:07

wanted to see how far have they been

23:09

taking care of our accounts and is there

23:11

a great standing relationship yeah they

23:12

were here before receivership through

23:14

receivership and since receivership okay

23:16

awesome no further questions thank you

23:18

thank you councilman Jones um I will

23:22

probably ask you some questions um off

23:25

record um I'm try in here

23:30

so uh no questions right now okay thank

23:33

you vice president green any questions

23:37

no I don't have any questions regarding

23:38

this thank you uh councilwoman Davis any

23:41

questions thank you president Bowers it

23:43

sounds pretty cut and dry to me no

23:45

questions thank you okay councilwoman

23:48

Daniels any

23:50

questions have questions okay thank you

23:54

um if there are no further questions or

23:57

comments related to Res resolution 12 of

24:00

2025 I move to add it to our next

24:05

legislative session agenda for a

24:08

vote resolution 13 of 2025 Mr Parker

24:13

could you please read it into the

24:15

record

24:16

yes resolution 13 of

24:19

2025 a resolution authorizing the city

24:22

of Harrisburg to negotiate and enter

24:24

into a landowner grantee agreement with

24:27

the dolphin County Conservation District

24:30

in furtherance of the 2024 countywide

24:33

action plan riparian buffer

24:37

project thank you um believe we have

24:41

gentlemen from the district wonderful

24:44

thank

24:50

you yes if you could please move that

24:53

microphone very close to you um press

24:57

the bottom button to make sure that it's

24:59

on

25:01

and is it on yes it's on can you move it

25:04

closer to you though if you uh good

25:06

evening um if you wouldn't mind

25:08

introducing yourself for sure um and

25:10

then providing an overview of the

25:12

resolution thank you yeah thanks a lot

25:14

thank you so much for having us my name

25:16

is Eric nuski I'm the uh department head

25:18

of the Dolphin County Conservation

25:21

District um and uh this is my good

25:25

evening I'm Josh Clark I'm uh the

25:27

countywide action plan program manager

25:29

with hrg and hrg serves as the

25:31

countywide action plan coordinator for

25:33

golin

25:36

County okay great um what we have what

25:38

we brought and thank you very much to Mr

25:40

Parker and Mr Grover for getting us on

25:42

the agenda it's it's a big help we've

25:43

been uh we're kind of up against the

25:45

time constraint to have this grant funds

25:48

these Grant funds spent so again thank

25:50

you very much for having us um the

25:53

property uh that in we're referring to

25:56

is 919

25:58

uh Gibson Boulevard it's uh behind the

26:01

Dolphin County Work Release Center um

26:04

it's about a 2

26:06

acre um lawn at this point um since the

26:11

building to my knowledge and what I was

26:13

been told by the people who work at the

26:15

at the um work Relief Center the county

26:18

has been maintaining this property since

26:20

the center was built in 1996 and

26:23

basically that just means mowing the

26:25

grass and maybe moving some down trees

26:27

if they fall um a couple years ago uh I

26:31

was approached when this the countywide

26:33

action plan funding came um to the

26:36

county and to the district and to the

26:38

County Planning Commission um we were

26:41

out looking for projects um I was

26:43

contacted by the staff at the at the uh

26:46

Work Release Center about maybe doing a

26:49

lawn to Meadow conversion on this

26:51

property to really achieve two main

26:53

goals one is to and probably the most

26:56

important is to at least in my my world

27:00

uh is to improve water quality going to

27:02

Spring Creek um the other the other

27:05

motivation behind this is um basically

27:09

to save costs on the maintenance the

27:11

mowing of the property um and the cap

27:15

I'm going the countywide action plan I

27:16

going refer to it as the cap the cap

27:18

funds um are part of a d Grant to the

27:24

county to improve water quality the

27:26

overall goal of improving water quality

27:28

to s River and then therefore Chesapeake

27:32

Bay as part of the state's Chesapeake

27:34

Bay Watershed um

27:38

yeah Watershed plan sorry um we're

27:42

looking at about 1.4 acres of converted

27:47

um lawn to a

27:50

meadow um and I'm going to let joshh

27:54

talk a little bit more about the the

27:55

technical part of this as far as like

27:57

what exactly that means a meadow um and

28:02

uh um off the top of my head I think

28:05

that's about it um I don't want to take

28:06

up too much of your time so Josh if you

28:08

want to go over what the sort of the the

28:11

nuts and bolts of the conversion what

28:13

that

28:14

means yeah so the idea here would be to

28:17

basically take the turf grass down as

28:20

low as we can get it without really

28:21

disturbing the soil and then conceivably

28:24

we would be drilling the seeds um into

28:27

what would have bin lwn so that it can

28:29

grow back as native plant species which

28:32

would be great for water quality for

28:34

pollinators that sort of thing um the

28:37

way that this is set up um we have about

28:39

a 40 foot um M area that will be

28:42

maintained as Turf so that there's a

28:44

line of sight through and down the hill

28:46

here um and there will also be um about

28:50

15 feet the whole way around for the

28:51

same purpose so that it's kind of

28:53

delineated as an intentional Meadow for

28:55

the whole thing um as Eric mentioned it

28:58

does reduce maintenance over time um

29:01

ideally this will be mowed once a year

29:03

after this after it's established so

29:05

that um Woody plants don't come through

29:07

it will be maintained as a meow over

29:09

time and it will lead to reductions for

29:12

water

29:16

quality okay thank you very

29:19

much could I add something to what Josh

29:22

said um the county has the county at the

29:24

work relase center they they they they

29:26

have um agreed to continue the

29:28

maintenance that annual mowing so there

29:30

would still be no nothing really that

29:32

would fall under the responsibility of

29:34

the city as far as that

29:40

goes thank

29:43

you okay I don't have any questions it

29:46

seems like

29:47

the um the confirmation letter I assume

29:52

this is is pretty clear on the

29:55

responsibilities um and for main areas

29:59

cooperate with the project Partners

30:01

during the preliminary work needed to be

30:03

completed allow project Partners to

30:05

perform site visits during project

30:08

scoping review and approve proposed

30:11

project design documents and allow the

30:14

planting of trees and shrubs on my

30:16

property as you mentioned um thank you I

30:19

don't have any questions thank you for

30:21

your presentation um I will now open the

30:24

floor to my colleagues who may have

30:26

additional questions this time I'd like

30:28

to begin uh with our uh Public Works

30:31

committee chair councilman Rodriguez um

30:34

do you have any questions or comments

30:36

related to resolution 13 of 2025 thank

30:40

you madam president and thank you

30:41

gentlemen for uh giving us that uh brief

30:43

synopsis of the project um are now when

30:47

we speak about uh what you guys are

30:49

talking about it definitely plays within

30:50

the County's comprehensive plan overall

30:53

um is there any assessments or any

30:55

surveys needed um or will you guys you

30:58

ready on

30:59

go yeah we're ready to go as soon as as

31:02

we're allowed to go awesome thank you no

31:04

no further questions thank you

31:06

councilman Jones any

31:07

questions um thank you thank you guys

31:10

for your uh brief presentation you know

31:13

but I do just want to say that um can

31:15

you guys do a little bit more we need

31:17

the best water quality that we could get

31:19

right now no but I appreciate uh you

31:21

know efforts taking steps towards that

31:24

um I think it's a great project and I

31:27

have no questions so thank you thank you

31:30

councilwoman Ros any questions um no I

31:33

don't have any questions I did see that

31:34

it was a meadow that was exciting you

31:37

know um and helps with the water quality

31:40

so um I was excited to see that I did

31:42

want to see what it would look like I

31:44

know you brought some plans and I didn't

31:45

know how we could let the community

31:46

members see that um so those were like

31:49

my two like comments slash questions

31:51

just so everyone could get a

31:52

visual I can forward over the Draft

31:55

plans and get some concept um photos

31:58

included as well that would be great

32:00

thank

32:01

you vice president green any questions

32:04

thank you president Bowers thank you all

32:06

for being here tonight I don't have any

32:07

questions um I would like to see some

32:09

pictures uh when I think Meadows I think

32:11

like frolicking through flowers so um

32:14

yeah like like uh getting to know what

32:16

it would look like a little better um

32:18

just helps from a personal perspective

32:19

so thank you thank you councilwoman

32:22

Davis any questions you president Bowers

32:25

and Mr dudeski and Mr Clark thank you

32:28

for your presentation um you mentioned

32:31

the water quality uh you specifically

32:33

mentioned Spring Creek I was just

32:36

wondering why you specifically mentioned

32:38

Spring Creek I know there's a lot of

32:40

other businesses in between and there I

32:44

so the topography from the Work Release

32:48

Center flows down to Spring Creek so any

32:50

of the Overland flow that goes through

32:52

that Meadow will be clean before it gets

32:54

to Spring Creek

32:57

the actual Creek

33:00

y okay cause he mentioned Spring Creek

33:02

so I didn't know I'm thinking about the

33:05

nursing

33:07

H okay so you're talking about Oak Creek

33:10

well if you don't ask questions you

33:12

won't know right the only dumb question

33:14

is the the one you don't ask thank you

33:18

thank you very

33:19

much councilwoman Daniels any

33:25

questions no questions thank you okay

33:28

thank you if there are no further

33:31

questions or comments I move to add

33:34

resolution 13 of 2025 to our next

33:38

legislative session agenda for a

33:42

vote our final resolution for discussion

33:45

within the administration committee is

33:47

resolution 14 of 2025 Mr Parker could

33:51

you please read it into the record yes

33:54

resolution 14 of 2025

33:58

a resolution authorizing the city of

34:00

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

34:03

memorandum of understanding with the

34:05

Squan Township School District for the

34:07

purpose of the continued use of assault

34:10

Dome storage facility and the removal of

34:13

solar

34:15

panels thank you a solicitor Grover are

34:19

I suspect that's me again you are you

34:21

present okay so um so this property at

34:25

least related to the city has a long

34:27

history it had belonged for decades to

34:29

the Harrisburg School District

34:31

Harrisburg School District got approved

34:33

and transferred the property to Susannah

34:35

School District on January 31st of this

34:38

year for I've I've lost track for eight

34:42

years maybe we've had a salt Dome parked

34:44

on these 40 acres plus solar panels we

34:47

had acquired are stored there under this

34:50

agreement um it extends our time to be

34:53

there formally by one year as long as we

34:55

remove the Sol solar panels off the

34:57

property I think by April 30th is under

34:59

the contract uh and then it's up for an

35:02

extension for a second year as we

35:04

relocate the salt Dome um and I will

35:08

note that that uh the school district

35:10

our school district shares salt with us

35:12

so we're not the only user of that

35:14

particular facility um so they've been

35:17

in the process of relocating a salt Dome

35:18

finding a location for it frankly I've

35:20

lost track how that's going but uh but

35:23

Public Works has been at that for a

35:24

while you need a piece of land that's

35:26

outside the flood plan to do that uh and

35:29

certain certain features uh to be able

35:31

to do it um the uh but this agreement

35:35

allows us to maintain that there without

35:37

having to immediately relocate uh the

35:39

property how long it will take uh that

35:42

property put into use otherwise I have

35:44

no idea where the subsquent school

35:46

district is in the

35:49

process thank you uh just wanted to

35:52

clarify on the removal of the solar

35:54

panels it notes um the solar pan panels

35:58

must be removed from the site within 90

36:00

days of closing or no later than April

36:02

30th of this year which you noted I just

36:04

wanted to note the 90 days in the event

36:07

um something

36:08

changes

36:09

[Music]

36:11

um the city of Harrisburg is authorized

36:14

to negotiate and enter into an agreement

36:16

with the cesan Township School District

36:18

to continue utilizing the salt Dome

36:20

storage area for a period of one year

36:23

with a possible one-year extension

36:25

subject to the school district's

36:27

approval and to remove the solar panels

36:30

from the property no later than April

36:32

30th

36:34

2025 I don't have any questions thank

36:37

you for uh providing the background in

36:39

history or reminding everyone um I will

36:43

again defer to our Public Works

36:45

committee chair councilman Rodriguez um

36:48

do you have any questions or comments

36:50

related to resolution 14 of

36:52

2025 thank you madam president uh

36:55

solicitor Grover would these be the same

36:57

panels that I believe we contracted

37:00

wildart by 2020 to remove it is exactly

37:03

the same they they were wrapped and

37:05

moved there at that time um and uh have

37:09

not as I know that I know have been

37:11

utilized in any way uh there's I think

37:13

differing opinions on their usefulness

37:16

uh as time has gone on but the

37:18

prevailing opinion is they're not very

37:20

useful at this point but that that they

37:22

have salvage value um in terms of having

37:25

them disposed of would we be able to

37:28

utilize our crew at public works or

37:31

within the city to remove them or would

37:34

we go with a similar you um with an

37:36

agency or a nonprofit crew no it will be

37:39

the city's crew the reason we had to use

37:41

another party last time was we were on a

37:43

clock rid of them from the the property

37:45

had been sold and the common was about

37:46

to put a building on that property so

37:49

that was what brought us to have to get

37:51

them out and it was a lot of hands to

37:53

disassemble them okay but now they're

37:55

just now they're wrapped and stacked and

37:57

um and so whether they go directly to uh

38:01

disposal I don't know or whether they

38:03

have a place they're going to locate

38:04

them but they were working on that last

38:06

I talked to them but they did believe

38:07

there was value in

38:10

um the scrap a component of was

38:14

particularly more valuable than other

38:15

parts the copper or internal and so uh I

38:19

had asked law Bureau has asked that they

38:21

get us uh someone of um uh qual

38:25

qualified to render an opinion on

38:28

usefulness of them like why are these no

38:31

longer of value um and this would come

38:34

back if they're going to dispose of them

38:35

they come back on a regular uh

38:37

resolution to council for disposal of

38:39

public property yeah um so uh but that

38:42

was the we were working on through

38:44

Public Works last I asked him to get us

38:45

that information yeah I would imagine

38:47

there's more high efficiency like units

38:49

nowadays but they probably definitely

38:52

have the use somehow some way even if

38:54

it's scrapping and getting from the

38:55

precious metals retaining some of the

38:57

value Val right I think I think the

38:59

theory is that that the having sat there

39:02

the internal parts are just not as

39:04

valuable and a new one is not much more

39:07

expensive than this old one and has a

39:09

longer lifespan but it's for cost

39:11

Effectiveness is something we could

39:12

definitely take care of in housee yes

39:13

absolutely okay thank you sure no

39:15

further questions thank you uh I'll now

39:18

move to the other end councilwoman

39:20

Daniels any

39:24

questions no thank you thank you

39:27

councilwoman Davis any

39:30

questions no questions okay vice

39:33

president green any questions uh no

39:36

questions just will note that the fee is

39:38

$100,000 or no $100 excuse me it's a

39:41

$100 fee for one year correct I guess so

39:44

I haven't pay attention to tell the

39:47

truth it says upon execution of the

39:49

agreement and upon sas's proper

39:52

invoicing of city city shall pay susuan

39:55

a fee of $100 for inter into the

39:57

agreement and for the first year license

40:00

period to

40:01

city right I think the reality is those

40:03

checks never get written When government

40:05

say it's $100 to each other all right

40:07

right it's like used to be you us you

40:09

used to say a dollar now you say $100

40:11

okay so all right thank you okay thank

40:14

you councilwoman Ross any questions that

40:17

was one of my questions um I did not see

40:20

that when I was reading it and I'm sure

40:22

I see it's like right there but um I was

40:24

wondering how much it was cuz I know we

40:26

are going to be in charge of the

40:28

liability for it do we pay the liability

40:30

insurance I so because it is a liability

40:33

they don't want it that's why they want

40:34

it off their property um so uh so that

40:37

that's that was the agreement get of us

40:39

getting rid of it so it's it would be

40:41

covered under our general liability of

40:42

of other property we have um I think

40:45

it's just the public works just trying

40:48

to make a determination whether it makes

40:50

sense to have them for a while and take

40:52

them apart or or to be more dramatic in

40:55

how they're removed and they're for help

40:58

to do that so so and uh but I think the

41:01

city Engineers on it the traffic

41:02

engineer people are on it public works

41:04

people are on it um and I'm waiting for

41:06

an answer back okay sounds good it's

41:09

pretty straightforward other than that

41:11

um thank you sure thank you councilman

41:14

Jones any questions uh yes um how much

41:18

are these were where are they going to

41:20

be no I'm messing with

41:21

you those were the same questions I had

41:24

the questions were asked and answered so

41:25

thank you true thank you if there are no

41:29

further questions or comments related to

41:31

resolution 14 of

41:34

2025 I move to add it to our next

41:38

legislative session agenda for a vote

41:41

this concludes the business of the

41:44

administration committee next we have

41:46

budget and finance committee I will

41:48

defer to our budget and finance

41:50

committee chair vice president green to

41:52

lead discussion thank you president

41:55

Bowers um looks like we have one res

41:57

resolution in the budget and finance

41:58

committee which is resolution 11 of

42:01

2025 resolution approving the second

42:04

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

42:07

appropriation and allocation of certain

42:09

funds and do we have anyone from the

42:11

administration to represent this so

42:13

these are actually both from the legal

42:15

department all right um as you know in

42:17

the annual budget there's a settlement

42:18

fund um it is depleted because we have

42:22

uh entered into or have negotiated

42:24

without final signature for separate

42:26

settlements

42:27

that will deplete the fund and we're

42:29

looking to re refurbish the fund so it's

42:31

moving $500,000 into the fund um you

42:35

know and some of those we've talked

42:36

about in the executive session of of how

42:38

we're resolving

42:41

those all right I thought we might have

42:44

got to hear from somebody else tonight

42:45

but it's good to hear from you I maybe

42:48

Michael just didn't call anybody I don't

42:49

know I have no idea

42:51

so that's incorrect I made sure that

42:54

everyone was going to be here

43:03

um I don't really have any questions

43:04

regarding this um I think the solicitor

43:06

covered it um for and did you want to

43:09

talk to the second one at the same time

43:10

or did you want to take them one at that

43:11

time I was going to do one at a time

43:13

anyone uh have any questions regarding

43:16

schedule one um I will start to my far

43:20

right here with councilwoman

43:25

Daniels no questions thank you

43:28

councilwoman

43:30

Davis no questions thank you president

43:34

Bowers I don't have any questions I'll

43:36

save my comment for the next

43:38

one thank you councilwoman Ross no I

43:42

don't have any questions thank you

43:43

though vice president green thank you

43:46

councilman Rodriguez no questions for me

43:48

thank you thank you and councilman Jones

43:50

any questions yeah I M as well so um no

43:53

I don't have any questions thank you

43:55

thank you very much um we can move on to

43:58

the second part of the schedule uh the

44:00

second item is the initial seed money

44:03

allocation there is no allocation for

44:06

the receivership petition we put in for

44:08

Governor Square um the city has filed as

44:11

you know a petition in the county court

44:13

ask for an appointment of receiver one

44:15

of the conditions of receivership is

44:17

that the Court's order will provide for

44:19

eventual reimbursement to the city of

44:20

any funds put up um I think just for the

44:23

cold hard reality this is an initial um

44:27

allocation as they get underway and

44:30

evaluate the property um I can tell you

44:32

the other step simultaneous with this is

44:35

getting a stipulation of stakeholders in

44:38

the process uh so that there's not a

44:40

fight about the receivership itself um

44:43

we did a similar thing that got us out

44:45

of Bankruptcy Court over to the county

44:48

court and it would be essentially the

44:50

same stakeholders although they're not

44:51

parties to the receivership um but they

44:54

have interest financially in the

44:56

property and in the debt of this so the

44:58

receiver uh we presented um Midtown

45:02

Properties uh as the requested receiver

45:05

they would open a separate LLC they

45:07

avoid the liabilities of the current

45:08

owner and manager and they would be

45:11

appointed to hire a qualified manager

45:13

approv approved by Hud and the court so

45:16

they would report to the court not the

45:18

city um and um the uh and we're doing

45:23

something I think fairly it's a fairly

45:25

big lift that we're undertaking but

45:27

there's no one else taking it um the

45:29

threat has been at different times just

45:31

for them to walk away and leave the

45:32

tenants there um so uh half of the

45:36

properties are vacant or supposed to be

45:39

vacant um the uh I think they 23 of the

45:43

buildings are

45:44

condemned um and so the idea is to come

45:47

up with a plan through someone who is

45:49

disinterested like a receiver to assess

45:51

both the accounts the vouchers the

45:55

physical plant and come up with a longer

45:57

term plan how to do it ultimately it

46:00

probably has a sale but frankly if

46:02

that's going to be HUD the receiver the

46:04

city and Court coming up with that but

46:08

ultimately right now HUD has the

46:09

approval of any purchaser the receiver's

46:12

original proposal in ter of the court is

46:15

not to sell the property but to assess

46:17

and get a manager and come up with a

46:19

plan to recover that property and put it

46:21

back into Service as a a low and

46:23

moderate income facility

46:29

all right um I have a couple of

46:31

questions but I'll I'll wait a little

46:33

bit um I'm going to start to my far

46:35

right ha with councilwoman Daniels do

46:37

you have any questions or

46:39

comments uh no thank you thank you

46:42

councilwoman Davis any questions or

46:46

comments thank you vice president green

46:48

no questions at this time thank you

46:51

president BS questions or comments I

46:53

don't have any questions uh related to

46:55

exhibit B I would like to offer an

46:58

amendment to the resolution as a whole

47:01

though um I would like

47:04

to um amend the document to add uh

47:09

funding from the municipal host fee um

47:15

$59,000 um as an allocation to the

47:17

Harrisburg Youth Sports

47:20

Association um I will have the language

47:23

and representation from uh the

47:26

Harrisburg Sports Association um during

47:29

our legislative session so I would like

47:31

to um suspend the rules for further

47:35

discussion then but I did want to just

47:37

note uh for the record that I will be

47:40

offering an amendment to um the

47:43

resolution thank you very much uh

47:45

councilwoman

47:46

Ross thank you vice president green um I

47:50

don't have questions I think just the

47:52

situation is disheartening for the

47:54

residents that's just

47:57

a concern of mine I mean that I don't

47:59

know I just wish there was more we could

48:03

do you know so I I think that's just my

48:06

biggest concern right now but I um I

48:09

would hope the receivership since they

48:11

don't have any ties either way um would

48:15

be able to help with this because there

48:16

are residents just living in real time

48:19

of disheartening conditions so um and we

48:23

would end up with a presentation for you

48:25

from the receiver as well approves them

48:27

but my understanding is they have about

48:28

a thousand units now under management

48:31

that are both commercial and residential

48:33

and buried in in in their youth so they

48:35

at least they have they have 25 people

48:37

in their employee they are very on the

48:40

ground experienced people okay um

48:42

frankly the city has gotten calls from

48:44

all over once we say we're going to do

48:45

this people offering to say they'd be

48:47

great at this from Vegas from New York

48:51

Jersey we the mayor the administration I

48:53

think the council they want someone

48:55

local who knows where to find a a sink

48:58

on a Saturday morning you know and and

49:00

who can install it who can get it done

49:02

for these people and that's what so we

49:04

wanted someone local on the ground who

49:05

knows the markets knows the most knows

49:07

where to buy things and it just isn't

49:09

going to be tied up in a lot of nonsense

49:10

no I agree I think

49:13

um I love out of town Out of Towners I

49:16

have nothing against anybody that's out

49:18

of town but we have so many issues

49:21

already with just out of town landlords

49:24

and property managers and um it's just

49:26

just really been um tough on our

49:29

residents so I I'm going please somebody

49:32

local please for the sake of those

49:34

residents and for a city that this this

49:37

project is just you know way too huge to

49:41

have anybody from out of town but I'm

49:42

sure you got inquiries from everywhere

49:45

everywhere so yeah but no thank you

49:48

that's

49:49

it thank you very much councilman rodri

49:52

councilman Rodriguez excuse me thank you

49:54

madam vice president um I pretty much

49:57

Echo those sentiments I think sometimes

49:59

just finding someone isn't good enough

50:02

we got to make sure it's not only the

50:03

right and qualified individual entity is

50:06

someone that has the heart and passion

50:08

CU we could be looking at the same

50:10

scenario 10 years down the line you know

50:12

if we're just talking about tax credits

50:13

or a quick benefit or a quick exchange

50:16

you know I just as Council will raw said

50:20

um Madam president has been up there as

50:22

have have I and I've seen condemned

50:25

homes condemn homes with babies still

50:27

living in them I've seen you know where

50:30

they're expected to still pay the rent

50:31

and there the bricks aren't finished on

50:33

the home you know is disheartening even

50:35

to the amenities I've run into a few

50:38

diabetic patients that have to put their

50:40

medicine in a cooler it's just not the

50:43

way you know our residents should live

50:45

um so although it's a difficult

50:47

situation my heart goes out to those at

50:49

Governor Square and um just hope we

50:52

could push past and to the exhibit uh

50:54

Madame President has referred to for the

50:56

amendment I too support that Amendment

50:58

um no further questions thank you very

51:01

much councilman Jones yes

51:05

um I I can say I Echo that with everyone

51:08

else said too um being that um you know

51:11

I will say this um you know early on

51:14

that you know the struggle that they

51:15

were having up there and I was trying to

51:17

get those uh places those vacant places

51:20

boarded up I'm glad to see that they are

51:23

now um with one of the initiatives where

51:25

I had the community come out we cut the

51:26

grass they seem to been able to maintain

51:29

that as well now my question for the

51:32

residents and viewers that are are

51:33

watching or maybe will check this out at

51:36

some point can you share what will

51:38

happen to those individuals because I

51:40

think that was part of the big thing

51:41

that no one you couldn't sell it because

51:43

someone would have to make sure that

51:45

those residents were moved and taken

51:48

care of until it was uh back up to cold

51:52

and and and being able to you know

51:55

occupy that space again so I can speak

51:57

in two ways to that okay um first is is

52:00

first there's going to be a plan on how

52:01

to restore what's there um and that I

52:05

don't want to pregu the people that have

52:07

the qualifications to put that plan

52:09

together or the Court's approval of it

52:11

right it's going to they're going to ask

52:12

about funding credentials licensing all

52:14

those things but under the federal

52:17

uniform relocation act if your facility

52:20

is supported by federal funds and for a

52:24

temporary basis or permanent basis you

52:27

were going to relocate someone and I

52:28

think the important word here is

52:31

temporary that so you can go into that

52:33

unit and repair it for them there is a

52:36

payment that has to be made to that

52:37

tenant here the one good thing about how

52:40

bad this is is that there are so many

52:43

empty units that if they'll have places

52:46

that are fixed so they can go fix the

52:48

ones people are in so it's nearly not

52:50

putting anyone in a hotel at this point

52:53

there's no there's no again it's not

52:55

going to be my plan it's not going to be

52:57

the council's plan but there's been no

52:58

talk of that it seems there's enough

53:00

facilities there as they get them back

53:03

up and occupiable and get an occupancy

53:05

permit that would be available to use

53:07

for the people that are there

53:09

temporarily as they get their unit back

53:11

up and probably they would have the

53:12

option of staying in that new unit if

53:14

they wanted that right you know that

53:16

that'll be there'll be options then but

53:17

I don't want to second guess the

53:18

management of this thing right right and

53:20

I don't want to second guess HUD I don't

53:21

want to second guess the well that

53:23

that's not that's not my aim here it's

53:25

just more so um in for residents because

53:27

you know we all

53:29

been figuring trying to figure out

53:31

what's going to happen with the people

53:32

there so um if you're if you're just

53:36

again that that sounds like something

53:37

that may be feasible but then I also

53:39

will have question that once we do get

53:41

that information will we be able to

53:42

share that so we can report out to the

53:44

community or there would be something on

53:46

the website for them to see so all of

53:48

this is going to be public it's going to

53:49

be supervised by a court right who has

53:52

no interest in the outcome other than to

53:54

make sure this place gets back up and

53:56

run running right the condition of

53:58

receivership which Under Pennsylvania

53:59

law is temporary is that it expires when

54:03

the property becomes um code compliant

54:06

right so the objective is to bring it up

54:08

to building code and health and safety

54:09

code and that would be the how

54:12

receivership expir and that's when

54:13

somebody probably look to swoop in in

54:15

right and grab it I'm sure long before

54:17

that lots of people want to buy it but

54:19

that money but i' say no one wants to

54:21

pay for what they should pay and the

54:23

city has taken a pretty hard line

54:26

there's been frankly a lot of Bottom

54:28

Feeders trying to get this and seems

54:30

like they would just let it go until it

54:32

was no longer required to be kept

54:34

affordable housing right right and so

54:36

we've been pting back pushing back very

54:38

hard that the city needs low and

54:40

moderate income housing desperately and

54:42

we can't afford to lose this much

54:44

property to absolutely Market look's

54:46

that 220 222 units yeah yeah so so the

54:50

the last thing I would ask too for not

54:52

just for myself but for the residents as

54:54

well those ones that are still in I want

54:57

to say squatting what's is is there a

55:00

plan for that that's beyond my thinking

55:03

that's why you need a property manager

55:05

comes in how to deal with it right and

55:07

then you and I I don't want to get into

55:08

the technicalities of squatting whether

55:10

there's property rights tenancy rights I

55:12

got you I got you you don't want to give

55:15

out all right that's all I have thank

55:18

you thank you very much um I do have a a

55:22

couple of questions uh first I guess

55:25

would be what will be the process

55:26

process of finding the receiver like

55:27

what would be the process that the city

55:29

would go through I've already found the

55:30

receiver the Mayor found the receiver

55:32

the first people that we've informally

55:35

talked to both most of them just shook

55:36

their head and said no um the people

55:39

from Property Maintenance were U Midtown

55:41

property main were very enthusiastic

55:44

they consider it part of their Community

55:46

part of their town they would like the

55:47

chance to make help make this right they

55:50

were seemed very very enthusiastic uh

55:53

they did accompany us to court uh about

55:55

it um and again they have they've

55:58

expanded to about a thousand units

55:59

already managing and they know the area

56:03

um and you know and in the end I think

56:05

improving this location helps them with

56:07

their locations right it just does and

56:10

it helps everybody um and so uh you know

56:14

the the always the devil's going to be

56:16

in the details right and uh I don't know

56:19

if a court will have its own

56:21

unique uh conditions it puts on it

56:23

that's going to be up to the court um I

56:25

don't know if

56:26

if it exists by the end of the year uh

56:29

it has its own conditions that they put

56:31

on to it um the you know the uh but

56:35

right now their requirements are it's a

56:38

check box of things you have to meet and

56:40

no one who had put in uh that claimed

56:44

that they were that the owner's claim

56:46

was a successful bidder none of them the

56:48

last I talked how had ever submitted the

56:50

paperwork to Hut they sub a request to

56:52

get the paperwork they couldn't they

56:54

could not come up with a recovery plan

56:56

which is one of Hud's requirements you

56:58

had a full recovery plan for the entire

57:00

property in order to be able to take it

57:02

over and that receiver will help put

57:05

together whether that becomes their plan

57:07

or a potential owner's plan you know

57:09

that's yet to be

57:10

seen okay all right uh and then my other

57:14

question was uh funding source um it it

57:18

shows here in the resolution it says

57:20

that

57:22

um we appropriated the amount of okay

57:25

where is the program funds described in

57:27

resolution 17 of 2024 is amended and

57:29

reauthorized in resolution 5 of 2025 is

57:32

amended or appropriated in the amount of

57:34

$8 million for affordable housing what

57:37

shall be the source of funding is that

57:38

the arpa funding the original arpa money

57:40

that's now in the state grant program

57:42

funding so that is the uh that is the

57:45

source of the

57:46

$250,000 okay um I think everyone should

57:49

be braced that it's going to be a lot

57:50

more than that right as time goes on um

57:53

but with the condition that as they get

57:56

the place to a positive cash flow Andor

57:59

sale the city will then get its funding

58:01

back into that state grant program okay

58:05

so it's we're looking to be able to

58:06

recover the funding at some point all

58:08

right um and I guess it was just

58:11

confusing just because of the way it's

58:13

written in the addendum that we were

58:16

given uh it's just written as grants to

58:18

local units and so I wanted to make sure

58:21

it was clear that it was coming out of

58:22

the arpa fund because in the resolution

58:24

here it seems pretty pretty clear to me

58:26

where it's coming from but in the agenda

58:28

we were given it says grants to local

58:30

units if you if you look up at line

58:32

three it says state grants

58:37

fund okay all right thank you I help any

58:42

other

58:43

questions I just had a clarification um

58:47

solicitor Grover I'm not sure if you

58:49

said it I thought you did but I think

58:50

you said they already had found kind of

58:52

a receiver that the mayor did Midtown

58:54

property Midtown Town Property

58:56

Maintenance okay but that but that

58:59

Corporation will open a separate LLC

59:02

which will formally be the one allowed

59:03

to manage the receivership oh okay I see

59:06

but they're still going through the

59:08

process like when what are the next

59:10

steps where we say okay they're

59:12

definitely the receivers like what's

59:14

going to the court says it right so so

59:16

we have the petition in front of the

59:17

court already if we had our funding and

59:19

we had our stipulation with the

59:20

stakeholders the judge would have signed

59:22

it at the very first day we were there

59:24

but we need one fund

59:26

uh we did not want to if the council

59:28

decided funding was inappropriate there

59:30

we we'd have to withdraw the petition

59:33

right and two if if the stakeholders

59:35

aren't in agreement of the terms it just

59:38

we're not here to litigate about

59:40

receivership you know that we're just

59:42

not going to spend taxpayers money

59:43

fighting on this private property uh to

59:46

make their lives better they have

59:48

they've cost us an awful lot of time and

59:49

money um so we're just trying to get a a

59:52

stipulation as we did in bankruptcy

59:54

court uh that the judge can then review

59:57

if he's good with it sign off and then

59:59

the receiver would be appointed

1:00:01

instantly and then they would have

1:00:02

either you know a 90 or 180-day window

1:00:05

to come up with a recovery plan to

1:00:07

assess the property to assess the

1:00:09

accounts which is important to us to

1:00:12

hire the property manager because he's

1:00:13

going to be the receiver um and Property

1:00:16

Management has to be approved by Hud

1:00:18

under their conditions has to be a

1:00:19

qualified HUD property manager um and uh

1:00:23

and so there's a lot of steps a lot of

1:00:29

yes thank you for that breakdown I was

1:00:30

wondering what the process was now that

1:00:32

we've now that the mayor Administration

1:00:35

found so when they want to be the

1:00:36

receiver what were the next steps just

1:00:38

so anybody who's listening and for us to

1:00:40

know this is what's happening right now

1:00:42

so thank you there'll be public other

1:00:44

public meetings on it as we get moving I

1:00:46

hope so yeah thank you for that sure

1:00:49

that's it for me thank you vice

1:00:50

president green thank you are there any

1:00:53

other questions comments concerns

1:00:57

seeing none I will recommend this move

1:00:59

to our next legislative agenda and that

1:01:01

concludes the business of the budget and

1:01:03

finance

1:01:04

committee thank you vice president green

1:01:07

the final committee business this

1:01:09

evening lies with the community and

1:01:12

economic development committee I will

1:01:14

defer to our chair uh councilwoman

1:01:17

Daniels to lead

1:01:20

discussion thank you um Mr Parker could

1:01:23

you read um uh resolution 13 He 2025

1:01:28

into the record

1:01:29

please yes Bill three of

1:01:34

2025 an ordinance amending the city of

1:01:36

harrisburg's official zoning map to

1:01:39

change the parcel zoning designation of

1:01:41

640 Al alrick Street to the industrial

1:01:46

IND zone of the residential medium

1:01:49

density RM Zone pursuant to chapter

1:01:53

7-33 of the codified order es of the

1:01:56

city of

1:01:59

Harrisburg thank you is there someone

1:02:02

representing the city and who could give

1:02:04

us a brief history of this resolution uh

1:02:07

yes uh good uh evening Council Jeffrey

1:02:09

Knight planning director with the city

1:02:11

could you speak into the microphone I

1:02:12

can't hear you yes uh Jeffrey Knight

1:02:14

planning director with the

1:02:15

city that

1:02:19

better it's a little better but the

1:02:21

sound is muffled for some reason all

1:02:24

right uh I'll try to make sure I speak

1:02:27

up that's that's why

1:02:29

better uh so the um application before

1:02:33

uh the council tonight uh is more of a

1:02:36

corrective action um than anything else

1:02:38

uh when the current zoning code and

1:02:41

zoning map were developed between 2008

1:02:43

and

1:02:44

2010 um at the time they had included uh

1:02:49

642 and I believe uh or sorry 640 and

1:02:52

642 I believe all Rick Street um which

1:02:55

are on the north side of all Rick Street

1:02:56

in the industrial uh zoning District uh

1:02:58

the property uh behind them and uh the

1:03:01

property just to the east were both in

1:03:03

the industrial district their auto

1:03:05

repair shops they probably had were like

1:03:07

that uh back when the map was developed

1:03:09

and it was probably more an issue of

1:03:11

just grouping whole properties within a

1:03:13

block uh into a single zoning District

1:03:16

um so the owner of the property uh came

1:03:19

to uh the city um actually the uh

1:03:22

realtor for the owner uh came to the

1:03:25

city and expressed that uh having a

1:03:29

zoning designation which did permit uh

1:03:33

the um a single family dwelling as a

1:03:35

byright use uh was either necessary for

1:03:38

them to uh sell the property or would uh

1:03:41

greatly assist uh in the property uh

1:03:44

sale process um and uh as noted uh a

1:03:49

single family dwelling is not permitted

1:03:50

by right in the industrial district um

1:03:53

so uh the the property owner uh through

1:03:56

their realtor did request uh that this

1:03:59

property be rezoned uh to residential

1:04:01

medium density which does permit uh by

1:04:03

right uh single family um dwelling uh

1:04:07

and so this is a relatively

1:04:08

straightforward um application

1:04:10

relatively straightforward proposal it's

1:04:12

a little different than maybe what some

1:04:14

of the other zoning map amendments that

1:04:16

Council has seen in recent years where

1:04:18

we've got somebody maybe looking to do

1:04:19

something in a property that's um you

1:04:22

know maybe zoned appropriately but the

1:04:23

building on site or the property itself

1:04:25

uh um you know accommodates other types

1:04:27

of uses this is more as I said a

1:04:30

corrective action um to address what was

1:04:32

you know a minor oversight uh when the

1:04:34

map was initially developed um and uh

1:04:38

with that all being said uh the Planning

1:04:41

Commission recommended that city council

1:04:43

approve the request for the following

1:04:45

reasons the subject property is adjacent

1:04:47

to and representative of Residential

1:04:49

Properties to the South uh which are

1:04:51

located in the residential medium

1:04:52

density zoning District meaning that

1:04:54

uses permitted by the new zoning

1:04:56

District would not be contrary to the

1:04:58

character of the neighborhood and would

1:04:59

includes th include those which could

1:05:02

otherwise be established in adjacent

1:05:04

properties uh the property appears to

1:05:06

have been incorrectly zoned as

1:05:07

industrial by previous City staff an

1:05:09

error propagated during the 2014 review

1:05:12

and Adoption of the current zoning code

1:05:13

and map the property is and always has

1:05:15

been residential yet the current zoning

1:05:17

designation would not permit such use by

1:05:19

right uh and finally the applicant has

1:05:21

provided evidence and testimony

1:05:22

documenting that the current industrial

1:05:25

zoning District adversely impacts the

1:05:27

value and salability of the

1:05:31

property thank you so I just I looked at

1:05:34

the that area and is that the only unit

1:05:38

that's uh industrial or there other

1:05:41

homes in that on that street that are

1:05:44

industrial as well that we need to fix

1:05:46

uh well so it I believe the um structure

1:05:49

uh directly to the east uh which I

1:05:51

believe is 642 uh alri Street um is also

1:05:56

um located in the industrial district

1:05:59

however we usually want to wait to have

1:06:02

a property owner uh bring this to us uh

1:06:05

because the owner of that property may

1:06:08

choose to sell their property to

1:06:09

somebody um who is uh proposing a use

1:06:13

that is permitted by right in the

1:06:14

industrial district um so they may want

1:06:17

to combine it with the adjacent Parcels

1:06:19

just to the east there or maybe they

1:06:21

want to run an auto repair shop out of

1:06:23

that and they would like to you know or

1:06:25

either they or a future property owner

1:06:26

would like to do that so they prefer to

1:06:28

keep the industrial district um so we

1:06:30

don't want to um necessarily speak uh

1:06:32

for the property owner um in a case like

1:06:34

this and if they did come to us we would

1:06:37

um of course recommend support uh for

1:06:40

such a proposal um using the same

1:06:42

justification as we are doing in this

1:06:44

case um but we do want that to be the

1:06:47

decision of a current or future property

1:06:51

owner um so is this is six 42 a brick

1:06:57

home or is it a white cinder block

1:07:00

looking

1:07:02

building

1:07:05

um the property to the um directly to

1:07:08

the east is a two and a half story brick

1:07:14

residence okay um have we ever done a

1:07:18

resoning

1:07:21

for pardon me I okay n just looking at

1:07:26

the geography it's obvious to me that

1:07:29

the GIS mapping like missed a little

1:07:32

piece and that's how it fell into this

1:07:34

industrial zoning category but if we

1:07:36

could fix a problem for a bunch of

1:07:40

people at once rather than peac mailing

1:07:43

it um because I mean like I doubt

1:07:46

someone wants a mechanic shop like right

1:07:49

next right next to

1:07:51

them so um well I

1:07:55

somewhat ironically there is you kind of

1:07:58

understand what what I'm trying to

1:08:00

communicate and I'm not articulating it

1:08:02

really well but um yeah I I do kind of

1:08:06

understand you're saying that yeah if we

1:08:07

could solve a problem more

1:08:10

broadly with this

1:08:12

bill I think we should well I guess what

1:08:15

I would say to that is um this was only

1:08:20

a problem because the current property

1:08:21

owner considered it a problem if the

1:08:23

owner of the adjacent property intends

1:08:25

to live there for 20 years and they

1:08:27

don't really care that their property is

1:08:28

owned industrial because they're going

1:08:29

to continue living there as a legal

1:08:31

non-conforming uh use on site that's

1:08:34

fine um if they again if they did want

1:08:36

to come to us but I don't know that um

1:08:38

the city should necessarily be in the

1:08:41

position to say like okay we're g to do

1:08:44

an action that your neighbor is doing

1:08:46

just because we think it makes sense uh

1:08:48

we we'd like to allow the property owner

1:08:51

to come to us uh with a proposal of that

1:08:53

nature

1:08:56

yeah but we kind of have to be uniform

1:08:58

and consistent and we tend to I mean you

1:09:01

know the the spot zoning is always a

1:09:04

little bit

1:09:06

questionable um I don't know uh could

1:09:09

law buo give us a little bit more

1:09:11

feedback on this like between now and

1:09:14

next

1:09:15

Tuesday um and is the applicant present

1:09:18

and uh and if they are could you just

1:09:21

give us a little bit of the issues that

1:09:23

you're facing it it is my understanding

1:09:25

talk to the broker the applicant may be

1:09:27

infirmed U and it's not actually in the

1:09:29

house right now but cannot sell it um

1:09:32

because it's it's zoned industrial but

1:09:35

let me say you cannot vote on this next

1:09:37

week There's a whole series of

1:09:38

requirements for public advertising a

1:09:40

public hearing has to be held um the

1:09:43

property has to be reposted so on those

1:09:46

things and and our office is working

1:09:47

with the clerk's office for the schedule

1:09:50

we have got an extension agreement with

1:09:52

the on behalf of the property owner to

1:09:54

be done by April 30th I think or April

1:09:57

28th so um we will we will give uh the

1:10:00

council at least what the advertising

1:10:02

requirements are it's a special ad with

1:10:04

more detail than usual you did one of

1:10:06

these two or three years ago maybe and

1:10:09

TI I can speak to the details I haven't

1:10:11

been into the details I will note spot

1:10:14

zoning is the government doing it as

1:10:16

opposed to the property owner doing it

1:10:19

so the idea that we would pick something

1:10:21

and say it should be this as opposed to

1:10:23

an applicant who's allowed to make an

1:10:25

applicant a property owner that is the

1:10:26

difference like a spot zoning and the

1:10:29

right to request a zoning map change for

1:10:31

your property um if we were just picking

1:10:34

properties out one by one for spot

1:10:36

zoning it would be a different issue um

1:10:39

we could treat this whole thing as a

1:10:42

correction um and that would take a

1:10:43

different

1:10:44

evaluation um but that would we are on a

1:10:48

clock with the current application so I

1:10:50

don't know if we could do both at the

1:10:51

same time but here I can speak to the

1:10:53

advertisement

1:10:57

uh yes the statute actually I believe

1:10:59

chapter 7

1:11:01

303.15 requires initially that 30 days

1:11:05

before the public hearing there needs to

1:11:07

be a posting on the perimeter of 640 a

1:11:10

street as well as uh certified first

1:11:14

class mailing sent to any other

1:11:15

surrounding Property

1:11:17

Owners um after that um there has to be

1:11:21

a special posting two consecutive weeks

1:11:25

um the first publish the first posting

1:11:27

not being more than 30 days before the

1:11:31

last posting not being no less than

1:11:33

seven days so um like I said we can work

1:11:38

with you together um I assume we would

1:11:41

work in collaboration with Mr Knight for

1:11:43

the postings and um we can assure that

1:11:46

you can pick out a timeline that either

1:11:49

works with your current sessions to have

1:11:53

like a public meeting right before one

1:11:54

of the sessions or if you decided to

1:11:57

just have a whole another public hearing

1:11:59

you know whatever dates that you want to

1:12:01

do we can ensure that your postings and

1:12:04

your

1:12:05

publishings um fall in line with the

1:12:12

chapter and actually I think speaking to

1:12:15

what councilwoman Daniel says right now

1:12:17

that chapter actually requires that the

1:12:20

property owner apply to because oh and

1:12:24

sorry after this

1:12:25

the after the public meeting if the

1:12:28

public meeting if at that time if the

1:12:30

proposed amendment is changed in any way

1:12:32

you would then have to repost and have

1:12:34

an additional public meeting if not you

1:12:38

have 30 days to um send the resolution

1:12:42

over to Dolphin County and then the

1:12:46

actual zoning map gets amended

1:12:52

so okay um so I'll open it up for

1:12:56

questions um I'll start to my left

1:12:59

councilwoman

1:13:00

Davis oh thank you councilwoman Daniels

1:13:04

I don't have any questions thank

1:13:07

you thank you vice president bre thank

1:13:09

you I don't have any

1:13:12

questions uh president Bowers I don't

1:13:15

have any questions I just look forward

1:13:17

to working with the law Bureau and Mr

1:13:19

night on a clear schedule moving forward

1:13:22

thank you

1:13:25

councilwoman Ross thank you I'm

1:13:27

councilwoman Daniels um just a small

1:13:30

question um because what councilwoman

1:13:32

Daniels was saying I I do partially

1:13:35

agree with her especially with not peac

1:13:37

Milling it but if there's other

1:13:39

properties that are also in this

1:13:41

industrial district being able to put

1:13:42

them in the um medium residential medium

1:13:45

dis um

1:13:47

density um portion of the zoning map so

1:13:50

I was wondering when we do the public

1:13:53

comments or the public engage

1:13:55

and the meetings does the information

1:13:59

say or ask other residents if you feel

1:14:01

like you're in also this industrial

1:14:03

district or if you are if you would like

1:14:05

to then be a part of the residential

1:14:07

medium density District or not District

1:14:10

but zoning um does it allow them that

1:14:13

chance to do that I'm just just a little

1:14:15

clarification on what that I'm I'm

1:14:18

assuming the point of them of us having

1:14:20

to let the surrounding Property Owners

1:14:22

know what's happening would then be time

1:14:25

for them to be able to come forward and

1:14:26

say you know what I want to do that too

1:14:29

that's what I was or I don't or why I

1:14:31

don't want them to do it you know what I

1:14:32

mean but so that is the point of the

1:14:35

surrounding Property Owners being

1:14:36

involved because it's their neighborhood

1:14:39

so at that time I would think they would

1:14:41

say oh well this is a process I follow

1:14:43

if I want to get that done as well okay

1:14:46

that's what I needed clarification on I

1:14:48

thought and figure that was the reason

1:14:50

but I didn't want to assume because I

1:14:53

also think let's not peace mil if we can

1:14:55

get more um residents who would like to

1:14:58

change their zoning that would make

1:14:59

complete sense instead of them coming

1:15:01

back one at a time so um thank you for

1:15:04

answering that question that allows me

1:15:05

to make a sound

1:15:08

decision thank you thank you um

1:15:11

councilwoman Daniels

1:15:13

sorry that's okay thank you uh

1:15:15

councilwoman Rodriguez thank you madam

1:15:17

chair um thank you Mr Jeff for being

1:15:19

here as always uh what would qualify a

1:15:23

um a home or someone request for the

1:15:25

medium density Zone what what would

1:15:27

qualify that um so I mean the this uh

1:15:31

property owner could have asked for

1:15:33

perhaps any uh zoning designation change

1:15:35

it to downtown Center if they wanted to

1:15:37

I think in that case that's what I would

1:15:39

consider spot zoning is there specific

1:15:40

like density or per capita that needs to

1:15:43

be in the equation so uh our current

1:15:46

zoning code only really has two uh

1:15:48

uniquely residential or specifically

1:15:50

residential zoning districts there

1:15:52

residential low density and residential

1:15:53

medium density uh we only have two

1:15:55

sections of residential low density

1:15:57

Academy Manor um up along Northern

1:15:59

Harrisburg and then Bel Park out in East

1:16:02

Harrisburg everything else whether

1:16:03

you're um you know kind of duplexes or

1:16:06

row homes is residential medium density

1:16:08

um I think there was like a residential

1:16:10

high density at one point in a previous

1:16:11

version of the zoning code that got

1:16:12

stripped out so it just kind of

1:16:14

flattened it all out pretty standard RM

1:16:16

District yeah so if you're almost any

1:16:18

home you're going to Pro and you are not

1:16:20

RM and you want to be more conforming to

1:16:23

what your property is you would ask for

1:16:24

an RM

1:16:25

okay great and then the amendment

1:16:27

application uh you had mentioned that

1:16:30

the tenant was enabled at the time is

1:16:32

this being done on behalf of like the

1:16:35

property owner or

1:16:36

realtor so it's not the actual like

1:16:39

tenant per se oh no so the property

1:16:41

owner uh has requested through the

1:16:43

realtor I think to Mr Grover's Point um

1:16:46

the property owner might be a little

1:16:47

infirm so I think the realtor's handing

1:16:49

handling a lot of this stuff uh for her

1:16:52

um I I think she has been included on

1:16:54

some of the communications he's aware of

1:16:55

what's going on so the property owner is

1:16:57

the one that put in the amendment

1:16:58

application correct okay yeah this is

1:17:00

not done on behalf of the property owner

1:17:01

by the realtor and just for council's

1:17:03

edification with that application

1:17:05

according to uh 73031 five the zoning

1:17:09

code Amendment uh subsection B would say

1:17:12

they would need to have the statement of

1:17:13

why the change would be in the interest

1:17:14

of the city including uh conformance

1:17:17

with the city's comprehensive plan and

1:17:18

neighborhood plans two a statement

1:17:20

addressing any adverse effects on

1:17:22

adjacent properties three a state

1:17:25

addressing any major traffic access or

1:17:27

congestion concerns four a map showing

1:17:30

the proposed boundaries of any proposed

1:17:32

map changes the existing zoning of the

1:17:34

subject land and adj excuse me adjacent

1:17:37

lands and the current use of the

1:17:38

adjacent Lots five completion of the

1:17:41

zoning text Amendment application or

1:17:43

zoning map Amendment application and of

1:17:45

course six the payment uh fees as set

1:17:48

forth and to the Publications uh public

1:17:51

notice shall be published once week uh

1:17:53

for two consecutive weeks in the newsp

1:17:54

paper or general circulation the first

1:17:57

publication shall not be more than 30

1:17:58

days and the second publication shall be

1:18:00

less than 7 days from the date of the

1:18:02

hearing for the zoning map amendments

1:18:05

public notice shall also include the

1:18:07

posting of a sign at conspicuous

1:18:09

locations along with the perimeter of

1:18:11

the subject property at the first class

1:18:12

mailling of the public notice shall be

1:18:14

set all current property owners who own

1:18:16

Parcels within the area proposed to be

1:18:18

reson at least 30 days prior to the

1:18:20

hearing by city council and number four

1:18:23

if any public hearings held upon on an

1:18:25

amendment the proposed amendment is

1:18:26

changed substantially or revised to

1:18:28

include the land previously not affected

1:18:31

by it the city council shall hold

1:18:33

another public hearing pursuant to

1:18:35

public notice before proceedings to vote

1:18:37

on the amendment so just wanted to make

1:18:39

sure they had the application in and to

1:18:41

council's point we were following

1:18:43

everything to statute yes and they

1:18:45

presented um to planning and were

1:18:48

approved and also to Dolphin County as

1:18:50

well with that application perfect um is

1:18:52

there any way Council can get a look at

1:18:55

their application answers um I believe

1:18:57

that was included in the pack that is in

1:18:59

there yeah okay perfect perfect if not

1:19:02

that would be great thank you we can

1:19:04

forward the package awesome thank you no

1:19:05

further

1:19:07

questions thank you councilman

1:19:09

Jones no

1:19:12

questions thank you so um Jeff I'll

1:19:16

connect with you um at some point and

1:19:19

then president Bowers will coordinate

1:19:22

scheduling sounds good

1:19:26

and that concludes the business of the

1:19:27

community and economic development

1:19:29

committee thank Youk you thank you uh we

1:19:33

will now move forward with our meeting

1:19:35

agenda next we have public comment uh

1:19:39

just a few housekeeping notes before we

1:19:41

begin please state your name and your

1:19:43

address for the meeting record if you

1:19:46

don't feel comfortable sharing your

1:19:47

address please share the vicinity in

1:19:49

which you live within the city you'll

1:19:51

have four minutes to share your comments

1:19:53

Mr Parker

1:19:55

will serve as our timekeeper I'll begin

1:19:57

to my right is there anyone that would

1:20:00

like to offer public

1:20:01

comment seeing and hearing no one anyone

1:20:04

in the middle section okay seeing and

1:20:07

hearing no one anyone to my left seeing

1:20:11

and hearing no one the time is 6:50 p.m.

1:20:14

I will entertain a motion to a journ

1:20:17

don't move is there a second a second

1:20:19

thank you we stand a journ

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free