Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Legislative Session 04/17/2024

1:37:49EnglishTranscribed Jun 14, 2026
0:13

we're going to lead our legislative

0:15

caucus before we formally call the

0:19

special legislative session to order so

0:22

I'll call it to order following this

0:24

caucus Mr trusdale will lead us in roll

0:28

call the invocation this evening will be

0:30

led by vice president green followed by

0:33

the Pledge of Allegiance which will be

0:35

led by councilman Jones we do not have

0:38

any

0:39

Communications for tonight we will then

0:42

open the floor for Courtesy of the floor

0:45

follow by the approval of minutes for

0:47

the legislative session that occurred on

0:50

April 9th

0:52

2024 then we will have reports of

0:55

committees you will hear the following

0:58

reports uh I will deliver the report on

1:00

behalf of the administration committee

1:03

on the work session that occurred on

1:05

April 16th

1:07

2024 then vice president green will

1:11

share a report on behalf of the budget

1:13

and finance committee on the work

1:15

session of April 16

1:18

2024

1:20

then chair Jones will share a report on

1:24

behalf of the Public Safety Committee on

1:26

the work session of April 16 2024

1:30

chair Ros will share a report on behalf

1:32

of the parks recreation and enrichment

1:34

committee on the work session of April

1:37

16th

1:39

2024 and councilman Rodriguez is absent

1:42

this evening we do not have any

1:45

ordinances for first reading ordinances

1:47

for Amendment or ordinances for final

1:50

passage we will then move to resolutions

1:53

the first resolution for consideration

1:56

is resolution 21 of 2024

2:00

which we will vote

2:01

upon resolution 22 of

2:05

2024 which we will vote

2:10

upon resolution 23 of

2:14

2024 which we will vote

2:18

upon resolution 24 of

2:22

2024 which we will vote

2:28

upon resol resolution 25 of

2:32

2024 we are going to table that

2:35

resolution uh the request was made by

2:39

councilwoman Daniels our community and

2:42

economic development committee chair to

2:45

add this resolution to our May

2:48

14th legislative session

2:51

agenda resolution 26 of

2:54

2024 we will suspend the rules for

2:57

discussion and then we will vote upon

3:00

this

3:02

resolution is there any old

3:07

business okay any new

3:11

business okay and then we will

3:14

adjourn I'm sorry I do have some some

3:17

new business yes sorry I was looking at

3:19

something I would like to just speak

3:20

about some things happening in

3:21

Harrisburg this weekend

3:30

any other new

3:32

business

3:58

okay

4:28

e e

5:06

evening again the time is 6:07 p.m. I

5:11

would like to call our special

5:13

legislative session to

5:17

order Mr trusdale could you please call

5:20

the

5:20

[Music]

5:21

role Miss

5:24

Daniels Miss Davis

5:26

present Miss green present Mr Jones here

5:32

Miss Rose present Mr

5:35

Rodriguez Miss Bowers present please

5:39

note for the meeting record that both

5:42

councilwoman Daniels and councilman

5:44

Rodriguez are excused this evening the

5:48

invocation will be led by vice president

5:51

green thank you president Bowers if we

5:54

could take a moment to keep the family

5:56

of Miss Becky Beamer Hicks in our

5:58

thoughts and prayers as well as all

6:00

those in the city of Harrisburg who has

6:01

lost someone and if we could also pay

6:04

our respects to the Fallen K9 Officer

6:08

Zeke thank

6:11

you thank you councilman Jones The

6:15

Pledge of Allegiance will be led by

6:17

councilman

6:21

Jones to the flag of the United States

6:24

of America to the Republic for it stands

6:28

one nation

6:36

indivisible thank you vice president

6:38

green and councilman Jones we do not

6:41

have any Communications this evening we

6:43

will move to Courtesy of the floor just

6:47

a few housekeeping notes before we begin

6:49

please state your name and your address

6:51

for the meeting record if you don't feel

6:54

comfortable sharing your address please

6:55

share the vicinity in which you live

6:57

within the city you will have four

6:59

minutes to share your comments Mr

7:02

trusdale will serve as our timekeeper I

7:05

will begin to my right is there anyone

7:07

that would like to offer public

7:16

comment good evening Council uh Brian

7:18

keyling Midtown I didn't intend to come

7:22

here tonight but I come in peace and in

7:24

good faith to bring something to your

7:26

attention that mutually impacts the her

7:29

harisburg Palestine Coalition and you

7:32

the Harrisburg city council as a body

7:34

you may or may not be aware that

7:37

yesterday afternoon David Cohen

7:39

president and CEO of the Jewish

7:41

Federation of Greater Harrisburg sent

7:42

out an email in which he addressed a

7:44

wide range of pro Palestine activities

7:47

that are taking place in Harrisburg and

7:50

the surrounding communities setting

7:52

aside the overarching dishonesty and

7:54

racism of his email there are some

7:57

things he said that you should be made

7:58

aware of as they directly affect you and

8:01

the work you do first Mr Cohen's email

8:04

claims that he is quote in active

8:06

conversation with the city and city

8:08

solicitor unquote regarding efforts to

8:11

prevent the Harrisburg Palestine

8:12

Coalition from engaging in legal

8:14

permitted activities in violation of our

8:17

first amendment rights as you are surely

8:20

aware the city is already currently

8:22

being sued by the ACU over first and

8:24

14th Amendment violations on another

8:27

matter if what Mr Cohen suggest is true

8:30

and the city solicitor or other

8:32

officials are engaged in activities that

8:33

will further violate the constitutional

8:35

rights of Harrisburg residents this

8:37

Council should be made aware of that as

8:40

you have a duty to intervene to protect

8:42

the rights of your residents and protect

8:44

our city from opening itself up to

8:46

additional costly lawsuits I don't want

8:49

my hard-earned tax dollars to be wasted

8:51

on lawsuits where my own rights were

8:52

violated I'd rather my rights not be

8:55

violated and my tax dollars go to

8:56

addressing the very real problems our

8:58

city faces

9:00

second Mr Cohen's email contains a

9:02

section that specifically pertains to

9:04

the ceasefire resolution HPC presented

9:07

to this Council and in it Mr Cohen takes

9:10

it upon himself to speak on your behalf

9:12

stating what council does or does not

9:14

support and what council will or will

9:17

not do to my knowledge Mr Cohen is not

9:20

the designated spokesman of the

9:21

Harrisburg city council especially given

9:25

that this Council has never made a

9:26

public statement regarding your

9:27

intentions to bring this resolution

9:29

forward or not Mr Cohen's email is a

9:31

Brazen admission of his own efforts to

9:33

have our resolution killed behind the

9:35

scenes

9:36

undemocratically I don't think I need to

9:38

explain how this looks to members of the

9:40

public the CEO of an organization

9:43

confidently assuring his stakeholders of

9:45

his influence over local politics sends

9:47

an alarming message to our Harrisburg

9:49

Community because to be clear that is

9:52

what he's doing it should never have

9:54

needed to be said but since he lived in

9:57

Boston less than a year ago and is new

9:59

here Mr Cohen may not be aware that the

10:01

Jewish community in Central PA is

10:03

significantly more diverse than just the

10:05

Jewish

10:06

Federation and the proud active Jewish

10:09

contingent of the Harrisburg Palestine

10:10

Coalition rejects any suggestion that he

10:13

speaks for us he is not our community

10:15

leader he is the president and CEO of

10:18

one organization an organization that

10:20

has alienated much of the Jewish

10:22

community over this very issue so he

10:25

doesn't speak for me but he also seems

10:27

to think that he speaks for you and

10:29

without the transparency on a resolution

10:31

that HBC has been asking for we won't

10:33

really be able to know for sure if he

10:35

does we have other Council initiatives

10:38

that would be of value to this city but

10:41

we need to know if we're actually

10:42

working with this Council or if we're

10:44

really going up against the mayor

10:45

solicitor and Mr Cohen operating behind

10:47

the facade of

10:49

council so that's all I'm not going to

10:51

ask you for anything tonight uh or take

10:53

more of your time I know the long night

10:55

you had last night and I don't intend to

10:57

drag this out for you any longer for a

10:59

second night in a row I do want to

11:01

respect your time but I'm here to

11:03

protect HPC because Mr Cohen's actions

11:06

are an escalation that uh directly

11:09

targets us and puts our community safety

11:11

at risk and I'm also here in the

11:14

interest of protecting you because

11:16

however HPC and council's relationship

11:18

May sometimes appear the Harrisburg

11:20

Palestine Coalition cares deeply about

11:22

the city of Harrisburg and our

11:24

Collective Community thank you thank you

11:28

thank you is there anyone else my right

11:30

that would like to offer public

11:33

comment seeing and hearing no one anyone

11:35

in the middle

11:36

section seeing and hearing no one anyone

11:39

to my left seeing and hearing no one

11:43

we'll move forward with the agenda as

11:45

printed next we have approval of minutes

11:48

for the legislative session that

11:50

occurred on April 9th

11:52

2024 council members are there any

11:55

revisions to those meeting minutes

11:59

okay seeing and hearing none the minutes

12:01

stand approved we will now move to

12:03

reports of committee I will deliver the

12:06

first report on behalf of the

12:08

administration committee on the work

12:10

session of April 16th

12:14

2024 on Tuesday April 16th 2024 the

12:19

administration committee met to receive

12:21

one quarterly report and one resolution

12:25

Mr Carl Singleton director of The Office

12:27

of equity and compliance was present to

12:30

share the first quarter report for

12:34

2024 highlights included the following

12:36

the mayor's Equity Roundtable small work

12:39

group is preparing to deliver policy

12:42

language to be considered by mayor

12:44

Williams and Harrisburg city council by

12:47

the end of

12:48

April um Mr Singleton participated in

12:51

the visit Hershey Harrisburg Dei

12:54

listening session 2024 annual goals were

12:58

discussed

13:01

monthly uh data showing new business

13:05

applications from the mertile and tax

13:07

office have been

13:10

shared council members ask questions

13:13

regarding local participation timeline

13:15

for legislation meeting attendance on

13:18

current projects Master format language

13:21

educational opportunities for small and

13:24

minority owned businesses and dbe

13:27

certification clarification

13:30

resolution 21 of 2024 is a resolution

13:34

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

13:36

negotiate and enter into a Professional

13:39

Services agreement with revised software

13:42

systems for the purpose of redesigning

13:45

upgrading and hosting the website for

13:48

the city of Harrisburg Mr Matt mael

13:51

communications director Miss Hillary

13:53

green procurement services and Mr Nathan

13:56

grumbine deputy director of The Bureau

13:59

of Information

14:00

Technology were present on behalf of the

14:03

administration Mr maelle noted that Mr

14:06

Jason Graves uh the alerted

14:08

administrator Business Development

14:11

worked diligently on the work group but

14:14

was unable to participate in the meeting

14:16

Mr mael shared that exploration for a

14:19

website redesign began in August of

14:22

2023 due to slow update speeds and a

14:25

lack of accessibility the focus of the

14:28

website read design is to create a Sleek

14:31

design with mobile accessibility there

14:34

were a total of 32 businesses that

14:36

responded to the RFP 15 moved on to the

14:40

second round seven moved to an interview

14:43

process revised software systems was

14:46

unanimously supported by the group

14:49

council members ask questions clarifying

14:51

revises location technical support

14:55

timeline clarification web design and

14:58

hosting capab abilities security issues

15:01

and breaches current website design and

15:03

cost security redesign approval and

15:06

website efficiency Thomas Jean owner

15:09

rise Software System shared those

15:13

various uh that there are various

15:15

approvals needed for the redesign

15:18

there's a 50% chance um that the

15:21

redesign will be completed by September

15:24

completion of the redesign is more

15:26

likely or more realistic to occur during

15:29

the fourth quarter of the Year Mr

15:32

grumbine shared that the design and

15:34

coding will be handled by Revis security

15:37

standards meet the city's capabilities

15:39

and are of no concern the current

15:42

website was designed by Gavin a lanster

15:45

based company and the cost is unknown

15:48

the last website redesign occurred in

15:52

2018 I encourage my colleagues to

15:54

support resolution 21 of 2024 to improve

15:58

the assess ability and userfriendly

16:00

nature of the city's website for

16:02

residents and members of the public this

16:05

concludes the administration committee

16:08

report next you will hear uh from vice

16:12

president green on behalf of the budget

16:14

and finance committee on the work

16:16

session of April 16th

16:18

2024 vice president

16:21

green thank you president Bowers during

16:23

the work session of April 16th of 2024

16:27

uh the budget and finance committee

16:29

discussed resolution 24 of 2024 which is

16:32

a resolution approving the third

16:33

proposed 2024 budget reallocation in

16:36

order to appropriate certain monies

16:38

locally designated as Revenue

16:39

replacement funding through an award

16:41

under the American Rescue plan act to

16:43

provide for specified projects during

16:46

this discussion um the main focus was

16:48

about the the pools in the city um there

16:51

was a request for $2 million excuse me

16:55

$1,945 th000 to be spent to Wards the

16:59

South Harrisburg pool uh in order to um

17:02

start phase one of the project which uh

17:05

consists of groundwork demo um soil

17:08

testing to see if it was an adequate

17:10

site as well as design development for

17:11

the project uh 55,000 was to be

17:14

allocated towards the Jackson lck pool

17:16

for pool repairs to ensure the pool

17:18

could open up for this year and then um

17:20

there was 6 million that would be air

17:21

marked into a special fund to ensure

17:23

that was available for the South

17:25

Harrisburg pool project uh in the

17:27

discussion council members um

17:29

asked questions about what would be done

17:31

with the the Jackson Lake pool um how it

17:33

we make it available for this year what

17:36

the repairs consisted of um and the

17:38

administration kind of went over it what

17:40

it would include Expansion Joints to

17:42

make for sure that there were no leaks

17:44

in the pool uh reox the bottom of the

17:46

pool repainting some of the gutters uh

17:49

redoing the pool bath houses to ensure

17:51

that they were adequate for our

17:52

residents uh and possibly redoing the

17:54

concession facilities um in the

17:56

discussion I think council members made

17:58

it clear that although we support uh

18:00

Jackson Lake pool opening for this year

18:02

so that our residents could have a pool

18:04

and our kids could have a pool uh inside

18:06

the city they could go to uh we were

18:08

interested in looking for other funding

18:10

sources so that we didn't start pulling

18:12

from money that was allocated towards

18:13

the South Harrisburg pool especially

18:16

given that um the funds that are there

18:18

already might not be adequate enough um

18:21

I did have a discussion with the

18:22

administration um the mayor did come to

18:24

the meeting at the end of the meeting

18:26

yesterday uh and she expressed her

18:29

thoughts on the project itself uh and

18:31

the need for the pool to open up uh I

18:33

did meet with the administration

18:35

including the mayor uh the business

18:37

administrator and um members of parks

18:39

and recreations today uh just trying to

18:41

figure out where we could come up with

18:43

some of the other funds from and I think

18:45

we have come up with a solution in order

18:47

to uh pull funds from the Capo project

18:49

line for a capo project for um road work

18:53

that won't be completed this year

18:54

because some things need to be done with

18:56

pined out beforehand so hopefully that's

18:58

a resol um a concession we can agree to

19:01

together uh in order to pull the 55,000

19:03

from a line item that's not going to be

19:05

utilized this year rather than pulling

19:07

it from arpa funds that we look to air

19:09

mark so that the South Harrisburg pool

19:11

can be completed um that's an amendment

19:13

I will bring forth when it's time for

19:16

resolution 24 of 2024 to be discussed

19:18

and um we'll be able to discuss it more

19:20

during that time and I would ask for my

19:22

council member support thank

19:25

you thank you vice president green the

19:28

next report you will hear will be

19:30

delivered by chair Jones the chair of

19:34

our Public Safety Committee on the work

19:36

session of April 16th

19:39

2024 thank you president Bowers uh so

19:43

first I will start with my um report of

19:46

uh the Harrisburg BAU

19:49

police on on April 16 2024 the Public

19:54

Safety Committee work session was held

19:56

um we discussed the quarterly reports of

19:58

the Harrisburg BAU of police um the

20:01

summary of the session was uh the

20:03

reports goals in the year-to DAT spend

20:05

of the C CSD in the

20:08

upd present to discuss uh was Captain uh

20:13

Thomas McGarity of the technical

20:15

services division commissioner Thomas

20:17

Carter uh Captain Russell Winder Mr

20:20

Angelo Craig and deputy chief young they

20:24

discussed the vice um the vice

20:26

statistics noting that 49 cases were

20:29

assigned seizing 60 um

20:33

60.25 ounces of cocaine

20:36

78.75 ounces of crack cocaine

20:40

21550 in US currency um they also served

20:44

uh 16 search warrants um 13 arrests were

20:48

made also there were 151 juvenile cases

20:52

assigned um the community service

20:55

division responded

20:56

to7 calls and issue eight

21:00

citations also discussed with the csa's

21:03

um they handled 172 calls for service

21:07

all in the first quarter uh they

21:09

attended eight community events uh The

21:12

Bu of police were able to take uh 51

21:16

ghost guns off the street and 41 and 43

21:19

manufactured guns off the street the TSD

21:22

division had the bur had a bur wide

21:26

training on use of forth use of force

21:29

tow vehicles and defense tactics the

21:33

uniform police uh division took in

21:37

18,893 calls for service and recovered

21:42

27

21:44

Firearms uh questions asked by Council

21:47

um I asked for an update on uh sidewalk

21:50

parking enforcement I asked uh of the

21:54

7,765 tickets that were issued on the

21:57

side which were which of them were

22:01

sidewalk parking for sidewalk parking at

22:03

the time there is no way that they can

22:05

break that number down noting that all

22:07

tickets written are violations not just

22:10

sidewalk violations Council also asks

22:12

about the status of the gvi Grant in

22:15

response more resources are being

22:17

gathered more Partners all working

22:19

toward the first initial Callin

22:21

commissioner Carter made Council aware

22:24

that um he plans to have a gun buyback

22:27

initiative with Mr Elby he also stated

22:30

that his officers were able to Ser save

22:33

four lives using

22:35

Narcan and that will end the report for

22:38

the Bureau of

22:40

police I will go on to the buau of

22:43

codes on April 16

22:47

2024 the Public Safety Committee work

22:49

session was held with the Bureau of

22:51

codes on their query reports the summary

22:54

of the session was the reports of their

22:57

goals and their year to date spend in

22:59

the first quarter of

23:00

2024 present to discuss the reports were

23:03

director Anne Montgomery she discussed

23:05

the scope of work for codes also

23:07

reported that there were nine prop non

23:10

properties lifted out of condemnation

23:13

via the progress Progressive expe

23:15

inspections there were 501 permits

23:18

issued 375 public complaints and 284

23:23

violations submitted 330 citations

23:26

issued and 84 hours of Court hearings

23:30

that were logged all in the first

23:32

quarter she also shared that the goal in

23:35

2024 uh was to demo 30 properties and

23:38

six of them were done in the first

23:40

quarter also out of the

23:44

67,5 appropriated uh for their budget in

23:48

the first quarter their year-to dat

23:49

spend is $

23:52

7,223 28 which leads a balance of $

23:56

58,5 26

23:59

72 questions that were asked I asked um

24:02

codes could they assist in the parking

24:05

uh violation happening with the vehicles

24:08

parked completely on the parcels in

24:10

response to uh in response director

24:13

Montgomery responded Yes and that two

24:16

call officers were assigned to North

24:18

17th Street uh where the officers will

24:21

be placed will be placing door hangers

24:24

notifications to remove the cars within

24:26

2 days after that citation will be

24:28

written um and an additional code

24:31

officer will inspect the North 18th

24:33

Street area in Holly Street um it was

24:36

further com um communicated that if Cole

24:39

seeds any cars on the sidewalk they will

24:41

notify police officer Justin

24:44

Wells and um there were no questions

24:48

asked by my

24:49

colleagues I mean there were no further

24:52

questions asked by my colleagues and

24:54

that ends a report of the burough codes

24:57

I we'll move on to the of fire on April

25:00

26 I mean April 16th 2024 the Public

25:03

Safety Committee work session was held

25:06

we discussed the quarterly reports from

25:08

the buau of fire the summary of the

25:10

session was the first quarter reports

25:12

and goals in year to spend year to date

25:14

spin present to discuss was Chief Brian

25:17

Interline Chief Interline shared a

25:19

breakdown of the major incident types

25:21

sharing that there was

25:24

16.41% good intent calls 25

25:29

87% false alarm and false cost

25:33

6.23 uh per of fires and 28.8 6 resulted

25:39

I mean of rescue and emergency calls in

25:42

the month from January there were 301

25:45

incidents 252 in February and 282 in

25:50

March as for the year today spend with a

25:52

budget of

25:55

7,274 7834

25:58

cents uh the year-to DAT

26:01

spend uh is

26:06

1,847

26:07

[Music]

26:09

15238 which would leave a balance of

26:13

5,427

26:16

6315 which equals

26:19

25.4% use of that budget we also spoke

26:22

about the three firefighters that

26:24

retired also informed Council that the

26:27

first quarter that there was one loss of

26:29

Life Council had no questions for chief

26:32

Interline and that concludes my report

26:35

for the Bureau of

26:36

fire now I will conclude with uh Public

26:39

Health Report on April 16th 2024 the

26:43

Public Safety Committee work session was

26:45

held on the quarterly reports of the of

26:48

the health department summary of this

26:50

session the reports were on the goals

26:53

and vacancies and Community engagement

26:56

present to discuss was director NVA

26:58

Wright we discussed the training

27:00

opportunities that are being identified

27:02

for 2024 the health office was invited

27:05

to present at the trans transitional

27:09

research Cancer Center um Consortium in

27:12

March also reported was there was 27

27:16

General inspections five new business

27:18

inspections eight Progressive

27:20

inspections and five public complaint

27:23

inspections and 10 special event

27:26

inspections all in the first quarter

27:29

there is a onep part-time uh inspector

27:32

position open as of April 5th of 2024

27:35

nine applicants applied and five

27:37

interviews are scheduled there's also an

27:40

updated Health license application now

27:42

available in Spanish there were also no

27:45

questions from my Council uh members and

27:48

that also concludes the report of Public

27:54

Health thank you the next report you

27:57

will here will be delivered by chair RS

28:01

on behalf of the parks recreation and

28:04

enrichment committee on the work session

28:07

of April 16th

28:09

2024 chair RS thank you president BS and

28:12

good evening every um body here in

28:14

person and online on April 16th 2024 the

28:19

Parks and Recreation and enrichment

28:21

committee convened to address resolution

28:24

22 of 2024 which is a resolution

28:28

ratifying the submission of a Grant

28:30

application to the Pennsylvania

28:31

Department of Conservation and natural

28:34

resources for the purpose of developing

28:36

a natural Green greencap Park to be

28:39

known as the SWAT Street

28:42

Park Mr Kevin Saunders the Parks and

28:45

Recreation manager shared a

28:47

comprehensive overview of the proposed

28:50

project project Partners sh Alex Rea and

28:54

George Payne elaborated on the park

28:57

green SC

28:58

space initiative planned for swader

29:01

Street in the AL in the South Allison

29:04

Hill

29:07

Neighborhood the partners presented a

29:09

two-phase project covering 10 Parcels

29:12

with phase one dedicated to eight

29:14

Parcels in phase two to the remaining

29:16

two Parcels they showcased visual

29:19

representations comparing the projects

29:22

envisioned outcome to the current state

29:24

of the parcels key benefits highlighted

29:27

included natural stress reducing

29:29

environments children's amenities solar

29:32

lighting security features like a police

29:36

substation and a focus on creating green

29:39

spaces and familyfriendly activities

29:41

driven by Community

29:43

preferences discussions involved post

29:46

completion responsibilities for the city

29:49

residents and project Partners including

29:51

maintenance supported by a dcnr grant

29:55

for 5 years responsibilities such as

29:58

creating at least one Ada accessible

30:01

curb cut and assuming maintenance duties

30:04

after the initial 5-year period were

30:06

allotted to the City community members

30:09

from groups like The South Allison Hill

30:11

homeowners association committee wildart

30:15

Ministry and other residents agreed to

30:17

share upkeep duties on a rotating basis

30:20

Council inquiries revolved around parcel

30:23

coverage the rational behind the

30:26

Project's location change con concerns

30:28

regarding gentrification and the

30:30

preference for aou over a contract

30:34

members of the Allison Hill Community

30:36

came out and strongly advocated for the

30:39

Green Space Project emphasizing its

30:41

positive influence on providing

30:43

recreational op options for harrisburg's

30:46

youth with robust Community backing and

30:49

acknowledgement of the Project's merits

30:52

the recommendation is for council

30:53

members to support resolution 22 of 2024

30:57

to Advance this community's initiative

30:59

in Harrisburg this summarizes the

31:02

proceedings of the park recreation and

31:04

enrichment committee thank

31:06

you thank you um as I mentioned earlier

31:09

chair Rodriguez is absent this evening

31:12

but I'll just provide a brief uh summary

31:16

report uh on the work session on behalf

31:19

of the Public Works committee that

31:21

occurred on April 16th

31:24

2024 on April 16th 2024 the public

31:27

Public Works committee met to consider

31:30

one resolution resolution 23 of

31:34

2024 which is a resolution of the

31:36

Council of the city of Harrisburg

31:38

authorizing and appointing Austin

31:41

Griffin deputy director of Public Works

31:43

as the city of harrisburg's design to

31:46

execute any forms documents contracts

31:50

and reimbursement agreements in the

31:52

Pennsylvania Department of

31:54

transportations electronic engineering

31:57

and construction management system and

31:59

reimbursement Agreement System um Mr

32:02

Griffin was present last night and he

32:05

shared that um due to the

32:10

um absence of Mr Daniel snow our city

32:15

engineer uh this would provide and

32:17

ensure that the Department of Public

32:19

Works had access uh to pend Do's

32:22

electronic engineering and construction

32:24

management system and would be helpful

32:27

um as they peruse um different projects

32:31

to determine the status um so that

32:34

concludes the brief report for the

32:36

public works committee we do not have

32:39

any ordinances first for first reading

32:42

ordinances for Amendment or ordinances

32:45

for final passage we will move to

32:47

resolutions the first resolution for

32:49

consideration is resolution 21 of 2024

32:54

Mr trusdale could you please read it

32:55

into the record resolution 21 2024 a

33:00

resolution authorizing the city of

33:01

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

33:04

Professional Services agreement with

33:05

Revis software systems for the purpose

33:08

of redesigning upgrading and hosting the

33:10

website for the city of

33:12

Harrisburg thank you council members are

33:15

there any questions comments or concerns

33:18

related to resolution 21 of

33:22

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trusdale

33:25

could you please call the vote Miss

33:27

Davis

33:29

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

33:35

roll yes Miss

33:37

Bowers yes resolution 21 2024 passes by

33:42

a vote of 5 to

33:44

Zer thank you next we have resolution 22

33:48

of

33:49

2024 Mr trell could you please read it

33:51

into the

33:54

record resolution 22 2024 resolution

33:58

ratifying the submission of a Grant

34:00

application to the Pennsylvania

34:01

Department of Conservation and natural

34:03

resources for the purpose of developing

34:05

a natural green skate park to be known

34:08

as the satera street park thank you

34:11

council members are there any questions

34:13

comments or concerns related to

34:15

resolution 22 of

34:18

[Music]

34:19

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trale

34:23

could you please call the vote Miss

34:26

Davis no

34:28

Miss

34:30

green

34:32

yes Mr

34:34

Jones

34:36

yay Miss

34:38

Rose

34:40

yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 22 2024

34:46

passes by a vote of 4 to

34:49

one thank you next we have resolution 23

34:54

of

34:55

2024 Mr trusdale could you please please

34:57

read it into the

35:01

record resolution 23 2024 a resolution

35:05

of the Council of the city of Harrisburg

35:07

authorizing and appointing Austin

35:09

Griffin deputy director of Public Works

35:11

has the city of harrisburg's designate

35:13

to execute any forms documents contracts

35:16

and reimbursement agreements in the

35:18

Pennsylvania Department of

35:19

transportations electronic engineering

35:20

and construction management system and

35:23

reimbursement Agreement

35:24

System thank you council members are

35:27

there any questions comments or concerns

35:30

related to resolution 23 of

35:34

2024 seeing and hearing none Mr trusdale

35:37

could you please call the vote Miss

35:40

Davis

35:42

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

35:48

rolls yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 23

35:54

2024 passes by vote of 5 to zer thank

35:58

you next we have resolution 24 of

36:02

2024 Mr trale could you please read it

36:06

into the

36:10

record oh that's

36:17

right impeccable timing so this is

36:20

resolution 24 of

36:23

2024 am as amended okay a resolution

36:28

approving the third proposed 2024 budget

36:30

reallocation in order to appropriate

36:33

certain monies locally designated as

36:35

Revenue replacement funding through an

36:37

award under the American Rescue plan act

36:40

to provide for specific projects thank

36:43

you uh at this time I will entertain a

36:45

motion to suspend the rules for

36:48

discussion so move is there a second I

36:50

second that motion thank you I will

36:53

defer to our budget and finance

36:55

committee chair vice president green

36:58

thank you president Powers um I guess um

37:02

I kind of went over in my report that I

37:04

would be making a um a motion to amend

37:07

this resolution uh so that the money for

37:10

the Jackson L prepars would come out of

37:12

a general fund reallocation um coming

37:14

out of a line item for um road project

37:18

that will not be completed this year

37:20

because the project is at a stand still

37:22

until pendot does the pre-work they need

37:24

to do so um I guess it looks look like

37:27

we have the finance team here that maybe

37:29

can go over the numbers a little better

37:31

kind of to to show um where the funds

37:34

are coming from and the back of the

37:35

amended resolution um there is a

37:39

Schedule D that was added or exhibit D

37:41

excuse me that was added that shows

37:43

which line items the funds will be

37:45

coming from and um how it will impact

37:48

things whenever you're ready if you

37:52

could use the microphone please thank

37:54

you thank you madam chair president

37:56

powers I will have um our accounting

37:59

manager go into the uh accounting and

38:02

budgetary details so that uh you know

38:05

we'll be hon do and explained to you

38:07

clearly if you have any questions from

38:09

he and I when he's complete please let

38:11

us know thank

38:15

you uh yes good evening get situated

38:18

here everyone uh hope you're all doing

38:21

well uh thank you president Bowers uh

38:25

president green vice president green

38:29

um I uh the city solicitor distributed

38:33

early the uh amended proposed third

38:36

budget reallocation it's been amended I

38:38

believe for the second time now my the

38:41

main focus there as you've gone over uh

38:44

a good summary ahead of me is exhibit

38:47

D and we became aware of the of a

38:51

lessening of the need to

38:54

fund uh streets and Roads project

38:57

projects in the capital projects fund so

39:00

the move to enhance the general fund and

39:03

to enable it to um address the $555,000

39:06

for Jackson lick is just a simple budget

39:10

uh Amendment adjustment moving from

39:12

transfers out to capital projects and

39:16

funding up the particular account uh P

39:20

pool improvements also in the general

39:22

fund in the Parks Recreation and

39:24

enrichment budget unit

39:28

so that's the $55,000 plus up because

39:31

it's interfund originally it was

39:33

appropriated for transfer to the capital

39:35

projects fund we have to mirror the

39:38

adjustment in the capital projects fund

39:40

by reducing both revenue and expense

39:43

because that $55,000 has determined to

39:46

not be needed in in cap projects so

39:49

that's why you're seeing the

39:50

corresponding uh two additional lines

39:52

for the capital projects

39:54

fund and again that's exhibit the

39:57

and it's footnoted footnoted a with the

40:00

uh brief

40:02

description thank you very much are

40:04

there any questions regarding this I'll

40:07

start my far left with councilman Jones

40:10

sorry thank you uh vice president green

40:13

just only one question you you said that

40:15

these funds aren't needed anymore um and

40:18

if they are uh what's going to replace

40:21

this

40:22

55 um it at the present time it's been

40:25

determined that there's just a lessening

40:27

of uh a particular streets and RADS

40:30

project uh there are several U but it's

40:33

been determined that the the the outlays

40:36

for 2024 won't be at the level that was

40:40

represents the original

40:42

appropriation okay but if if you

40:45

indicate if the possibility does develop

40:47

later in the year that there's uh a turn

40:51

of events or a need we can accordingly

40:53

come back and and readdress that okay no

40:56

further

40:58

questions thank you uh councilwoman R

41:01

any questions uh I don't have any

41:03

questions I just want to First just say

41:05

you know thank you for um vice president

41:09

green for um looking into this

41:12

diligently today and asking them to do

41:15

so but also thank you Miss Kelly and

41:17

Brian for looking into this and I'm

41:19

trying to find a way to work this out so

41:21

that we didn't set a precedent that we

41:24

are taking money from um projects such

41:27

as as um the pool that would be going

41:29

out the sou or um any other projects

41:31

that we know are are very necessary but

41:34

actually trying to find it coming out of

41:36

other Appropriations that as you said we

41:39

don't um need have a need for at the

41:41

moment and don't see one in the near

41:44

future so I just want to thank you both

41:46

for working on that

41:48

today yes well three of you everybody I

41:51

want say you both I was but but um all

41:53

three of you working together I know

41:55

last night was a little SP spicy at the

41:57

end but I think it proved to show that

42:01

we can we we can um act as adults and um

42:06

figure things out um even when um at

42:10

first there's there a b turmoil so just

42:12

um thank you for all of us coming

42:14

together and doing that y thank you no

42:16

you're welcome yeah and it it was a

42:18

collective effort with the team

42:20

including uh budget manager input from

42:23

the mayor and also the uh business

42:25

administrator well I hope they're watch

42:26

I say than you to all of them as well so

42:28

I always worry about the numbers but I I

42:31

appreciate Neil's office being able to

42:33

handle the intricate legislation

42:35

adjustments that go along with something

42:37

like this so it was big big team effort

42:40

it was well thank you team anybody miss

42:43

I'm so sorry but yes thank you everybody

42:45

and I'm sorry for not recognizing the

42:47

mayor and Mr Brooks I to do that earlier

42:50

sorry oh that's so oh it was your idea

42:53

okay it was his thank you councilman

42:56

Jones

42:58

that's it for me thank you president

43:00

Bowers thank you um I don't have any

43:04

questions as long as we're confident

43:06

that uh the funds won't be needed for

43:09

our streets and Roads um and if that's

43:11

clear I'm fine with moving forward um

43:14

thank you for the collaboration uh and

43:18

communication uh I think that um both

43:21

are very much needed particularly in

43:24

instances like this one um and I'm glad

43:27

glad that we were able to come to some

43:29

level of a compromise so thank you thank

43:32

you thank you councilwoman Davis thank

43:35

you vice president

43:37

green I just like to say that I'm glad

43:41

that everything has worked out um it is

43:45

good to see our teams work together and

43:48

come to a positive solution for our

43:52

residents

43:53

so thank you that's it thank you very

43:58

much um I want to say thank you to all

43:59

of my council members um just for having

44:01

the conversation last night and um

44:03

ensuring that we did do our job and we

44:05

were diligent with uh looking over

44:07

everything uh and keeping our priorities

44:09

first um thank you to the mayor and the

44:11

administration for being willing to have

44:13

the conversation today um so that we

44:15

could come to this point and work

44:16

together um I will say I am confident in

44:19

our finances at this point um and there

44:23

were several other places we could have

44:24

pulled the money from we chose this

44:26

because we're confident we won't be

44:28

needing this money this year for this

44:29

project uh but there were other places

44:31

we could have pulled it from we could

44:32

have patched it together so um I do feel

44:35

confident that if the need would arise

44:37

to do a road project uh we would be able

44:40

to to come up with the money so thank

44:42

you very much for everybody um and I

44:44

think that's all that I have when it

44:46

comes time for the actual amendments I

44:49

will need help from our solicitor

44:51

though all

44:54

right okay so

44:58

so any further comments questions on

45:02

resolution 24 of

45:05

2024 before we return to our legislative

45:09

session okay seeing and hearing none

45:11

I'll entertain a motion to return to the

45:14

legislative session so moved is there a

45:16

second second thank you so before us we

45:19

have resolution 24 of

45:23

2024 Mr trusel could you please read it

45:25

into the record one more time

45:30

resolution 24 2024 a resolution

45:32

approving the third proposed 2024 budget

45:36

replacement or reallocation in order to

45:38

appropriate certain monies locally

45:39

designated as residue replacement

45:41

funding through an award under the

45:43

American Rescue plan act to provide for

45:45

specified projects as amended as amended

45:48

as amended thank you thank you uh

45:51

council members I'll defer to vice

45:54

president green for her amendment I

45:57

would like to propose an amendment with

45:58

the assistance of the solicitor because

46:01

this is not an ordinance but a

46:02

resolution it's just very simply the

46:04

count a motion to adopt the

46:08

uh third budget reallocation as amended

46:12

as of April the 17th

46:15

2024 okay I would like to make a

46:17

resolution to adopt the resolution 2024

46:21

of 2024 as amended as of April 17 2024

46:28

is there a second I second that thank

46:31

you council members any questions

46:33

comments or concerns related to the

46:36

amendment seeing and hearing none Mr

46:39

trale could you please call the

46:42

vote Miss

46:45

Davis

46:47

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

46:54

Rose yes Miss Bowers

46:58

yes the amendment passes by a vote of 5

47:01

to

47:01

[Music]

47:03

zero

47:06

okay so we're good to go we don't have

47:08

to have another vote because it's a

47:09

resolution as amended thank you um

47:12

resolution 25 of

47:14

2024 as we noted during our caucus has

47:18

been tabled and will be included on our

47:20

May 14th legislative session agenda our

47:24

final resolution this even is resolution

47:28

26 of

47:29

2024 Mr trale could you please read it

47:32

into the record resolution 26 2024 a

47:36

resolution authorizing the city of

47:37

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

47:40

Professional Services agreement with

47:42

Alexander boding construction company to

47:44

serve as the construction manager for

47:46

the reservation Rehabilitation and

47:48

reconstruction of the Broad Street

47:49

Markets red brick

47:52

building thank you council members I

47:54

will entertain a motion to suspend the

47:56

rules for for discussion soon moved is

47:58

there a second second thank you I will

48:02

defer to our parks recreation and

48:05

enrichment committee chair to lead the

48:07

discussion chair

48:09

Ros thank you very much

48:13

um so is there anybody here from the

48:16

administration to talk about resolution

48:18

26 of

48:20

2024 and if so please join us up here at

48:22

the front

48:29

we'll be right with you we're grabbing a

48:30

computer real quick

48:39

for yeah they get a computer

48:59

this

49:12

[Music]

49:49

to be up with

49:55

this what you got Pres

50:50

um please excuse our brief submission

50:52

right now we're just trying to get a few

50:54

things um up and running with the

50:56

computer Compu so give us a moment if

50:58

you are joining us online and uh we'll

51:01

get started shortly thank you for your

51:03

patience

51:55

m for

52:37

I USB the HDMI

52:46

[Music]

53:06

do it

53:20

under good experience thank you yeah

53:28

okay all right uh let me know when you

53:31

guys are ready I we're ready when you

53:33

are okay all right good evening city

53:36

council um I'd like to I'd like everyone

53:39

to introduce himself to the table here

53:40

real quick and then we can start the

53:41

slideshow if we can start from my right

53:44

and then work our way over to the left

53:46

um please go ahead and introduce

53:48

yourself good evening nice to see you

53:50

guys again I'm Terrell Davis with

53:52

Alexander building construction project

53:55

manager good evening everyone Steve Wilt

53:58

project executive with Alexander

54:00

building

54:01

construction good evening Debbie reart

54:03

project manager with the Department of

54:06

facilities and special

54:08

projects all right good evening Senate

54:10

council my name is David Baker I'm the

54:12

facilities director for the city of

54:13

Harrisburg uh tonight we'd like to bring

54:15

to you uh what what I foresee as one of

54:18

uh many approvals um for the Broad

54:21

Street Market brick building uh this is

54:24

a um basically a break down of our uh

54:28

scoring process for the uh Broad Street

54:31

Market construction manager portion of

54:33

this project um in front of you you see

54:37

a uh breakdown of the scoring uh for the

54:40

construction manager uh portion of the

54:42

project um as you can see at the bottom

54:45

the totals on the scoring you see the

54:47

individuals uh Daniel Hartman our City's

54:50

business administrator was one of the

54:51

individuals Scott Miller who is a

54:53

project manager for the facilities

54:55

Department who has um 25 years of

54:57

experience in the field and Deborah

54:59

reart who has over 25 years of

55:01

experience in project management um in

55:03

this field as well um in the two

55:06

paragraphs below you can see some of the

55:09

some of the many key features uh that

55:11

kind of separated the um Alexander group

55:15

as far as the construction management

55:16

firm goes um and uh I think some of the

55:20

ones that I noticed were uh their um you

55:24

know their deep understanding and um you

55:28

know years of work in the fire

55:29

restoration field and also doing period

55:32

specific rebuilds uh before you some of

55:35

the pictures of a few of the different

55:37

projects that they've completed and on

55:39

that note I'm going to hand this one

55:41

over to Alexander to kind of give you a

55:43

synopsis on what it is that they're

55:45

going to be bringing to the table for

55:47

the city and what their role is in the

55:49

project um or in the um construction

55:52

manager uh role that they'll be playing

55:56

thank

55:57

you again I'd like to start off by

55:59

telling you a little bit about Alexander

56:01

Alexander lives works and plays in the

56:04

city we've been in business since 1928

56:07

over on vaugh Street same location and

56:10

have done a lot of the work in the city

56:11

over the

56:12

years we're a construction management

56:15

firm we do a lot of interaction with

56:17

different um communities within the uh

56:21

Harrisburg Area um and we looking

56:23

forward to bringing our fire uh water

56:26

wind and Restoration company to the

56:29

table to assist in this uh historical

56:32

and and unique

56:34

building it's been a long time coming to

56:38

actually do some work uh on this

56:40

building I remember as a young child my

56:42

grandmother would take me here to to buy

56:45

her products and everything uh and it

56:48

has been just a just a beautiful

56:50

beautiful building back in the day and

56:52

we want to take it back to that Glory we

56:55

will be uh bringing in a superintendent

56:57

the superintendent will be uh working as

57:00

a eyes and ears of of you an extension

57:04

of your services since we work directly

57:06

for you and give advice and direction to

57:09

the prime contractors that are brought

57:11

on board we will direct them through the

57:14

coordination and communication with the

57:19

city we are looking forward to um

57:22

engaging the community we know there's a

57:25

lot of uh PR around this project and we

57:28

are looking forward to making sure

57:30

people are understanding what's going on

57:33

um the way that you want it distributed

57:35

and sent out to the

57:38

community um as far as the uh the job

57:42

that we're going to be doing we will

57:43

assist with the hiring of the architect

57:49

and the and the um Engineers we'll make

57:52

sure that uh it's vetted properly

57:54

working through hand in hand with the uh

57:57

buildings and grounds folks and making

58:00

sure that we uh are able to lay out the

58:04

best team for the project taking a look

58:06

at our staff uh when we looked at this

58:08

project we were adamant about putting on

58:11

the right team to this project it's a

58:13

unique job so we made sure that we have

58:15

our restoration advisors we have a

58:18

project manager that has has done this

58:20

type of work before and other team

58:22

members that are really dedicated to

58:25

filling the team team out properly in

58:27

order for us to make sure that we can

58:29

perform the best for you on this

58:32

project quality control is a key issue

58:35

for us uh we're going to make sure that

58:38

it's a quality job that everybody can be

58:40

proud of we'll make sure that when we're

58:42

bringing on contractors they're local to

58:44

the community we Engage The the wbe MBE

58:48

and disadvantaged

58:50

businesses we have a large database and

58:54

we've worked in concert with many

58:56

uh folks in the area that will really

58:58

help us work towards a common

59:02

goal and I think that's pretty much

59:06

where I'm at with the the overall

59:08

construction there's many other elements

59:09

in our proposal but one thing I would

59:11

would highlight and I don't know that um

59:14

it's been talked about much but there's

59:17

Insurance monies that are dealt with

59:19

this project our our fire restoration

59:22

folks they deal with insurance carriers

59:25

all the time and and there are other

59:28

processes that they're familiar with

59:30

with the estimating software with the

59:33

with the understanding what U unforeseen

59:36

items can be actually going back to the

59:39

insurance company so it's not a cost to

59:41

the city so we're going to take every

59:43

step we can to make sure that you're

59:46

getting as much as you possibly can for

59:49

our

59:51

services right on that note uh do any

59:54

members of council have any questions

59:56

for us oh thank you um I'm sure we've um

1:00:00

a few of us do have some questions I

1:00:02

know the Broad Street Market is a um a

1:00:04

huge undertaking and a loss to the city

1:00:07

right now so we are definitely looking

1:00:09

forward to it being rebuilt um not just

1:00:12

back to um what it was but even better

1:00:17

um I think um we're definitely looking

1:00:19

forward to that so I thank you all for

1:00:21

coming out tonight and speaking to the

1:00:23

to us about this about the project

1:00:26

um thank you also for um uh director

1:00:30

Baker for putting up how the scoring

1:00:31

system went who was on the team I know

1:00:34

that is something I'm always looking for

1:00:36

uh with the bed process and so are the

1:00:38

residents to see how um construction

1:00:41

companies are being picked um I did have

1:00:43

a few questions for you and then also

1:00:45

for Alexandra and Co and then I will um

1:00:48

pass it to my council members um my

1:00:50

first question um for you uh director

1:00:52

Baker was um I had noticed that when the

1:00:55

bid process went out one of the

1:00:57

qualifications was you were looking for

1:01:00

the lowest bid now I didn't see up there

1:01:02

what the bids were but then I did notice

1:01:05

that um when the bids were finished

1:01:07

Alexander and Cole were the highest bid

1:01:09

so I was just wondering um even though

1:01:12

your you were your qualifications were

1:01:14

the lowest bid why did you all decide

1:01:17

and was there a score my first question

1:01:19

was would be were was there a score for

1:01:23

um the the money bid was there a scoring

1:01:27

process for that and if so uh what did

1:01:30

each bidder get for that score and uh

1:01:34

when did you change your qualifications

1:01:36

for um wanting the lowest

1:01:40

bid all right so um to that question

1:01:43

with this process this RFP process we

1:01:45

the city doesn't actually have to go

1:01:47

with the lowest bid the lowest cost for

1:01:49

the bid we try and go with the most

1:01:51

responsible bidder to get the most U

1:01:53

bank for our buck as far as what cont

1:01:55

contractors we go with what Consultants

1:01:57

that we go with um and and in this

1:02:00

process you know after the scoring was

1:02:02

all said and done uh that was what the

1:02:04

individuals doing the scoring felt is

1:02:06

that with this uh particular firm that

1:02:09

we would get the most benefit out of out

1:02:11

of these individuals for the money that

1:02:13

we'd be paying um and Alexander was not

1:02:16

the highest uh I think they were second

1:02:18

the highest no they were the highest

1:02:21

they were second I thought they were the

1:02:24

highest oh so so that's confusing there

1:02:27

were actually two Alexanders um that

1:02:29

were being scored so okay I'm sorry my

1:02:31

eyes could have went really quick you

1:02:32

know once I saw the 984 th000 I could

1:02:35

have wandered a little bit right so that

1:02:38

yeah hope hopefully that answers the

1:02:41

does that um well yes and partial I know

1:02:44

but

1:02:46

um I think my confusion comes with if

1:02:49

and I would be confused if I was put in

1:02:51

a bid if the qualification says we're

1:02:53

looking for the lowest bid but then that

1:02:56

kind of comes off the table when you end

1:02:58

up picking a company you didn't really

1:02:59

pick the company that did that had the

1:03:01

lowest bid because maybe as you're going

1:03:03

through figures you're trying to get it

1:03:04

as low as possible but then you actually

1:03:08

aren't looking for that when everything

1:03:10

is said and done so I think

1:03:12

that as we're putting out bids making

1:03:15

sure we stick to what we asked for and

1:03:18

our scoring process reflects that

1:03:21

because that wasn't part of a score was

1:03:23

it like you know how much the bid came

1:03:25

in

1:03:28

as that was I didn't see the fee was

1:03:31

part of it okay that was that's my

1:03:33

question I didn't can you go back to

1:03:35

that

1:03:36

slide and Madam chair to be a lawyer for

1:03:38

a second please do um a request for

1:03:42

proposal is different than a bid okay

1:03:45

okay and so request for proposal is a

1:03:48

proposal which has many factors into

1:03:51

qualification numbers what the plan is

1:03:54

there's um and it's just it's not the

1:03:56

same rules you're talking about the

1:03:58

submission of The Proposal no the whole

1:04:00

thing there is it starts it starts as a

1:04:02

as a request for proposed RFP whereas a

1:04:05

bid has a different legal structure to

1:04:06

it right okay even a bid is not required

1:04:09

in Pennsylvania to be the lowest bid

1:04:10

it's the lowest responsible bid based on

1:04:13

the bid package put out you know and so

1:04:16

and so you look at the you look if you

1:04:18

say and we'll take it out of this thing

1:04:20

like let's say you're you're you're

1:04:21

doing a road work and part of it is um

1:04:24

we we are uh we are a new road company

1:04:27

we've never done any road work or we

1:04:28

don't have a bond that has to come with

1:04:30

it I mean there's a lot of little things

1:04:31

that come in it and I didn't do this one

1:04:32

I'm just I'm but there is a lot of

1:04:34

nuance when you're doing these and

1:04:36

there's some of them are check boxes

1:04:37

right you got to have this like remember

1:04:39

the incinerator there was no bond you

1:04:40

got to have you got to have your

1:04:41

performance bond you got to have your

1:04:43

payment Bond different things come into

1:04:46

these but there's also other in most of

1:04:49

these you have a list of things you have

1:04:51

to have in terms of conditions and some

1:04:53

of them are the qualifications of of the

1:04:56

different Professionals in it some of

1:04:57

them are um the uh sticking with the

1:05:01

categories that were there some are

1:05:03

having experience doing certain things I

1:05:05

mean but so everyone is sort of unique

1:05:07

to our project and that's just not

1:05:08

Harrisburg you take the project and you

1:05:11

and and they try to write up something

1:05:12

that covers the actual project that's

1:05:13

trying to get done but they are

1:05:15

different and so that there that's and

1:05:17

so they to drill into what you really

1:05:19

drill into the whole RFP packet like not

1:05:22

just the one piece it's a it's a pretty

1:05:24

thick packet that that went out the door

1:05:27

yeah I I do understand what you're

1:05:28

saying I just want to make sure we're

1:05:30

clearing what we ask um companies or

1:05:34

what we're saying the qualifications are

1:05:36

because that is how they I would would

1:05:38

think create their proposal round this

1:05:41

is what they're looking

1:05:43

for that's all I'm saying just I just

1:05:45

want to say be clear and and be concise

1:05:48

and then keep that same requirement as

1:05:50

you go through the process cuz that

1:05:53

would only be fair that's that's my only

1:05:55

point in that that um if I'm not

1:05:56

clearing what I'm saying please let me

1:05:58

know but I just wanted to make I was

1:05:59

just saying it felt like we switched it

1:06:01

up once the bids came in or the rfps

1:06:04

came in as I if we switched it I'm

1:06:07

unaware of that

1:06:09

okay

1:06:12

um it just it just seemed that way to me

1:06:15

like I thought it was saying you know

1:06:17

we're kind of looking for the the lowest

1:06:20

bid but or the lowest RFP but that's not

1:06:25

really what it

1:06:27

was that's what well if it was a bid

1:06:30

would still it's still responsible bid

1:06:32

it's not lowest we we we have

1:06:35

responsible to do the project as

1:06:37

proposed like you know there is some

1:06:39

knowledge when you put the bid package

1:06:41

together it's going to require this much

1:06:43

time this many people and if if if a

1:06:46

number doesn't hit that number we've had

1:06:48

that for example with lawn cutting like

1:06:49

where someone comes in and their bid

1:06:51

couldn't cover the gallon of gas for

1:06:53

each lawn they were cutting you know so

1:06:54

how are you going to do this you know um

1:06:57

but it's it's a it's initially comes up

1:06:58

a lot in procurement okay all right

1:07:02

thank you um also I

1:07:06

um I think my other thing my other

1:07:09

question was going towards a wbe

1:07:11

participation I know that I think on

1:07:13

your application you said you don't

1:07:15

participate

1:07:17

and we always participate okay always we

1:07:22

actually have a mentor prot program very

1:07:25

active active um on all our jobs not you

1:07:28

know a requirement or you know a set a

1:07:31

set amount we don't we don't go by that

1:07:33

we go by going out to all our our

1:07:37

contractors and and just saturating the

1:07:41

market I that's what we do so

1:07:46

um we have a lot of we have a lot of

1:07:48

people in our database um that it's just

1:07:52

a good it's a good process that we've

1:07:54

always had and we we will get you know a

1:07:58

lot of participation we always do

1:08:01

it Tyrell didn't seem too impressed with

1:08:04

that answer no he was like no I'm going

1:08:08

to move on I have other questions but

1:08:10

I'm goingon to let my council members go

1:08:11

I don't like to be greedy um uh so I

1:08:14

want them to ask some questions too so

1:08:16

I'm going to start on my uh farle with

1:08:18

councilman uh

1:08:20

Jones thank you uh councilwoman Ross

1:08:26

how how are you guys today my question

1:08:28

is going to start out with you Mr Baker

1:08:31

so these numbers up here what do they

1:08:35

mean so we have uh multiple categories

1:08:39

that everything is graded off of there's

1:08:41

there's a a slew of different categories

1:08:43

the whole packet that the the grading

1:08:45

team will go through so um each

1:08:49

different category they'll go across and

1:08:52

they'll grade from that specific

1:08:54

category for every single r RP that they

1:08:56

read so let's say you get a 30 page RFP

1:08:57

they read every page of the RFP they go

1:09:00

through on these you know every single

1:09:02

line on the scoring sheet and then they

1:09:04

score each individual RFP on every

1:09:07

single line and then all those lines

1:09:09

they add up you they get in a room

1:09:10

together they all go over their

1:09:12

different um scoring numbers and then

1:09:15

these are the end results for all the

1:09:17

scoring that's done for every single RFP

1:09:19

that comes in and they read and go

1:09:22

over okay so this is like the the end

1:09:24

result the tabulation after all the math

1:09:27

problems have been done and this is the

1:09:29

end result for that that tabulation okay

1:09:32

what do they

1:09:33

mean um so each category and I mean we

1:09:38

could I don't know just give me an

1:09:40

example because I'm just all I'm seeing

1:09:41

is like numbers I'm just seeing numbers

1:09:44

I don't know what these numbers mean

1:09:46

some numbers are high some numbers are

1:09:47

low I don't know what they mean right um

1:09:50

so what we did is we set up a scoring

1:09:52

Matrix and

1:09:55

there several categories that we score

1:09:57

on I can't hear you ma'am yes sorry um

1:10:01

several categories that we score on so

1:10:03

for example the first one is plan

1:10:05

purpose objectives and challenges so

1:10:08

what what we're looking for is the

1:10:10

proposal the contractor's proposal of

1:10:12

how well they understand what we're

1:10:14

looking for that's one we score on that

1:10:17

um another criteria is the team

1:10:20

qualifications and experience do they

1:10:22

have the correct experience right people

1:10:24

assigned to the team

1:10:25

um and we read proposals on that um we

1:10:29

also had a criteria this particular one

1:10:31

because we wanted to make sure that the

1:10:34

uh construction manager had his staff or

1:10:37

their staff excuse me on site every day

1:10:40

to make sure that things are going way

1:10:42

they should be so we scored on that if

1:10:44

they if they address that in the

1:10:46

proposal then they got a certain amount

1:10:48

of points yeah I would you know uh again

1:10:50

Mr Baker what I would love to do for me

1:10:53

to to let me have a butter

1:10:55

understanding how you're selecting these

1:10:57

individuals and no disrespect to your

1:10:59

company you guys seem to been around for

1:11:01

a very long time but this is like for me

1:11:03

is my second time seeing you guys in

1:11:05

front of me and is that based on is that

1:11:07

is those any of these numbers represent

1:11:10

the level of their experience or how

1:11:11

many years they've been in business does

1:11:13

any of these numbers up here represent

1:11:16

that yes we one of the criteria is it a

1:11:19

main factor let me ask it that way so

1:11:21

every single one of these factors are

1:11:23

weighted in in their own regard and one

1:11:25

of the factors is how much uh experience

1:11:28

they have in this specific type of

1:11:30

restoration project and that that that's

1:11:33

a big determination on on who we move

1:11:36

forward with so that is one of the the

1:11:38

grading criteria that we look for is the

1:11:41

this exact type of restoration work and

1:11:43

how much experience they have and the

1:11:45

ability they have to do what we need

1:11:47

them to do in our specific case okay so

1:11:50

I'm going say

1:11:52

this I'm going to look at Jem right

1:11:57

right is that 22 points

1:12:02

off and the bid was maybe $400,000

1:12:06

cheaper why weren't they

1:12:09

selected so we always just gone by the

1:12:12

point system on here as far as and I

1:12:15

shouldn't just say that it's the point

1:12:17

system is a huge Factor but also you

1:12:19

expect to see a certain amount of money

1:12:21

for the services rendered and if the

1:12:24

number is completely out of the park

1:12:27

either above or below what you're

1:12:28

expecting to see what industry standards

1:12:30

are that is a factor that you take into

1:12:33

account whenever you're doing the

1:12:34

grading as well so you're saying that

1:12:36

there's a concern if it doesn't meet the

1:12:37

threshold that you think that the amount

1:12:39

of money that it would take for to get

1:12:40

this project done what about the the

1:12:42

level of experience because if we're

1:12:44

just now what I'm asking for is is

1:12:46

specifically the numbers I said they're

1:12:48

400,000 short than what their bid

1:12:51

was right right okay so if you're

1:12:55

looking at that that number that lower

1:12:59

number doesn't have anything to do with

1:13:01

their experience maybe they may have

1:13:02

know how to do this work that they SC so

1:13:04

let me just say this this is what I

1:13:06

would like to see before I vote on this

1:13:08

I would like to see the rfps that were

1:13:10

out there and then I want to sit with

1:13:12

you and show me how you grade this

1:13:14

that's that's what I would like to see

1:13:16

we can do that all right no further

1:13:19

questions thank you councilman Jones um

1:13:22

president Bowers do you have any

1:13:24

questions I did thank you m um my first

1:13:28

question is I wanted to know how the

1:13:31

team was assembled that review the rfps

1:13:35

that were received uh so we try and keep

1:13:38

an odd number of individuals on the

1:13:41

grading sheet so we don't have any sort

1:13:42

of you know ties or anything and in this

1:13:45

case we took individuals that all had

1:13:47

institutional knowledge in the area that

1:13:49

we'd be grading in

1:14:00

it

1:14:01

seems this has been a recurring question

1:14:04

with Mr Singleton the director of equity

1:14:06

and compliance his involvement in uh

1:14:10

Broad Street Market meetings generally

1:14:14

um but it seems like in this instance um

1:14:18

he should have been

1:14:21

included in some iteration of the odd

1:14:24

number

1:14:26

of individuals assembled for this

1:14:28

[Music]

1:14:29

team

1:14:32

um was a pre-proposal meeting held yes

1:14:38

can you please speak into the microphone

1:14:40

yes when was it held um I don't remember

1:14:44

the day it's generally about three weeks

1:14:47

after the

1:14:57

well do you know how many people or how

1:14:59

many companies were

1:15:02

present

1:15:03

four it's a required walkth

1:15:13

through I would like more clarification

1:15:16

on the scoring rubric and what's

1:15:19

included I think that you you you

1:15:23

mentioned maybe three areas is but I I

1:15:25

didn't hear

1:15:27

seven and what is the scale for the

1:15:33

rubric two 100 points

1:15:38

total you us to read each

1:15:42

individual I would like to know or see

1:15:45

it or something because I can also okay

1:15:49

thank you read that yes okay um plan

1:15:54

Purp goals objectives and challenges the

1:15:57

first criteria that was allotted 10

1:16:00

points team qualifications or experience

1:16:03

was allotted 15

1:16:06

points uh firm will indicates

1:16:09

willingness to have staff on site daily

1:16:11

was allotted Five

1:16:14

Points firm prior experience with

1:16:16

restoration of historical structures was

1:16:19

lotted 10

1:16:22

points the proposed construction manager

1:16:24

back background education Knowledge and

1:16:27

Skills was a lotted 10

1:16:31

points project schedule um just ensuring

1:16:35

that it's detailed and comprehensive and

1:16:37

reasonable that's 15

1:16:41

points project budget was allotted 10

1:16:46

points the fee was allotted 20

1:16:50

points say fee that much the Fe that

1:16:54

they were would be charging

1:16:58

okay and the quality of The Proposal

1:17:01

response was

1:17:05

fiveth seems like a few people

1:17:09

drops so

1:17:12

only go ahead go ahead I I was still

1:17:14

writing go ahead all right I think the

1:17:16

only way that we can actually see how

1:17:18

this I mean I can hear all of those

1:17:20

things now we have to see the well again

1:17:23

I would love to see the rfps and then

1:17:26

compare them if council members want to

1:17:28

sit down and walk through all of them I

1:17:30

mean I don't think I'm not how many of

1:17:33

them were submitted no yeah I want to no

1:17:36

I think I talked with the mayor's office

1:17:38

they have no issue of setting up a time

1:17:39

and taking people and walking through

1:17:41

the whole thing absolutely and so and I

1:17:43

and I think that's a fair way to people

1:17:45

to look at it it's it is a detail

1:17:47

oriented thing it's a lot of data a lot

1:17:49

of information um and you can see the

1:17:52

whole flow of it like I mean I'm

1:17:54

familiar what rfps look like but I'm

1:17:56

saying understanding this scaling and

1:17:58

this grading system I mean for Council

1:18:00

when when you bring these projects or

1:18:02

these uh um yeah projects to to to

1:18:06

council all we see is this we don't

1:18:08

really get to see right so so we're

1:18:10

really concerned about this goes back to

1:18:12

where I started earlier the difference

1:18:14

when there's bids you don't ever you

1:18:16

never see the bid because the bid abut

1:18:18

because the bid is picked by by the way

1:18:20

the law works so rfps come back to you

1:18:22

because there's this other component to

1:18:24

them right but I would suggest if

1:18:26

council members want to do that the most

1:18:28

efficient may have like two people at a

1:18:30

time if you want to do it because you CU

1:18:33

scheduling everybody one at a time will

1:18:34

take a lot of hours however we got to do

1:18:36

it now we want to see it but that well I

1:18:38

talked to the mayor today I talked to Mr

1:18:39

Hartman and that was with the what I got

1:18:41

coming out of that meeting

1:18:44

okay thank you did anybody determine

1:18:47

when the pre-proposal meeting was held

1:18:49

March the 12th thank you

1:18:56

I don't have any other questions just a

1:18:58

comment I just I'm not sure how

1:19:00

Equitable this process was so I don't

1:19:03

know if us

1:19:05

reviewing the rfps at this point if

1:19:08

there's a process issue um I don't have

1:19:11

any further comments thank you thank you

1:19:13

president bar would agree with

1:19:16

that what you just said

1:19:18

so um vice president green do you have

1:19:22

any

1:19:23

questions uh I I think kind of some of

1:19:25

the comments that I I would have had

1:19:26

were already stated so it's no need for

1:19:29

me to go into it further thank you MH

1:19:32

and um councilwoman Davis do you have

1:19:34

any questions thank you councilwoman

1:19:38

Ross I think I'll uh re I'll reserve my

1:19:43

questions until after we get a chance to

1:19:46

review the project um so thank you

1:19:50

you're welcome um yes if we could

1:19:55

set up some time to uh review the

1:19:58

project I know this is what council is

1:20:00

asking for I believe they might have

1:20:02

asked for a few things to be emailed um

1:20:05

if I forgot what that may be does

1:20:07

anybody want to reiterate so I don't

1:20:09

miss it I thought somebody well you

1:20:11

wanted the I think president bers you

1:20:13

were but you read um Miss Reinhardt read

1:20:15

off the rubric did you want that emailed

1:20:17

yes I would like to see okay thank you I

1:20:20

think my just small reservation I first

1:20:23

of all Alexander and Co I think that

1:20:26

you're a great company I know you're

1:20:27

going to be doing the senator

1:20:29

Stadium um so it's not that we feel like

1:20:33

you do not do uh quality work I think

1:20:37

some reservations are that um and you

1:20:40

may not know of this but uh when the

1:20:42

federal building went up when the new

1:20:44

courthouse went up uh residents had

1:20:48

some concerns feelings and

1:20:51

concerns because we weren't a part of it

1:20:55

um no con no rfps or bids however we

1:20:59

want to say the words that went out

1:21:02

included anybody in our community um no

1:21:07

disadvantage business businesses were

1:21:10

included we were left out but it's in

1:21:12

our

1:21:14

community so we can't allow that to

1:21:19

happen again we saw how it felt we saw

1:21:21

the aftermath so what we want to make

1:21:24

sure is that the Broad Street Market

1:21:27

that we've all went to grew up

1:21:31

with we have a seat at the table and

1:21:34

that any company that comes

1:21:36

in and whoever is going to restore that

1:21:39

and preserve it does it with us hand in

1:21:44

hand so I think that's where our

1:21:47

reservation comes from and um it it just

1:21:50

kind of was you know you you already

1:21:52

have the senator Stadium now the Broad

1:21:55

Street Market so you know how does that

1:21:56

work that's two really large projects

1:21:58

where we're not a part of so uh yeah if

1:22:01

we could just get some information I

1:22:03

will not be putting this on the

1:22:04

legislative agenda for the next meeting

1:22:07

uh although I I know we want the Broad

1:22:10

Street Market done we're ready for it to

1:22:12

up and go but I I think that we have to

1:22:15

make sure we're doing this the right way

1:22:17

um I have one last question though um

1:22:20

and nil you may be able to answer answer

1:22:22

this in a legal way when uh or you made

1:22:25

to Mr Baker the team that is

1:22:29

formed uh to go over the the scorings or

1:22:33

go over the interviews and do the

1:22:34

scoring system is it allowed to be um

1:22:39

anyone do they have to be a city

1:22:41

employee and I asked that because the

1:22:45

vendors who were affected in that in the

1:22:47

brown the The Brownstone of the BR

1:22:49

Street Market the brick building would

1:22:52

they be allowed to be on the team since

1:22:55

CU I know you said Mr Baker you put

1:22:57

people on a team who have direct

1:22:59

knowledge of whatever the project is

1:23:02

which they would have direct knowledge

1:23:04

they were affected they know what they

1:23:05

need they know what kind of company

1:23:08

they're looking for is that would that

1:23:10

be allowed so every one of these is

1:23:13

unique but there's not a Prohibition to

1:23:15

have non- city employees on there you

1:23:17

have to as the responsible person with

1:23:19

having Insurance have our people there

1:23:21

they have to be part of it um but at the

1:23:24

end of the today those appointments are

1:23:25

simply an executive function it's up to

1:23:27

a mayor in in this form of government to

1:23:30

to assign people to take care of these

1:23:32

things whether they she ask them or

1:23:34

requests them it's much easier to assign

1:23:36

someone who works for you than assign

1:23:38

someone who

1:23:39

doesn't pragmatic piece that's all right

1:23:42

right but if you but also if you're

1:23:44

trying to make I'm you know and this

1:23:46

isn't towards you or anyone really

1:23:48

directly but just to say I just wanted

1:23:50

to see you know if you're able to have

1:23:53

non City absolutely have on some things

1:23:56

so it just it just depended on the

1:23:58

project I can't you know I think you

1:24:00

know there's a lot on the plate right

1:24:01

now that's large and and I think that's

1:24:03

part of why when it's large you just go

1:24:05

with what who's here right right so okay

1:24:09

thank you I hope moving forward we can

1:24:11

change up our the teams that uh do do

1:24:15

the scoring system I think they've been

1:24:17

the same for the past couple of projects

1:24:20

and I think also making sure uh we're

1:24:23

we're placing people on there that it

1:24:25

also directly affects I have a question

1:24:28

though what was the process prior to

1:24:31

this scoring

1:24:33

system when you how did you select the

1:24:36

people that that bid or this scoring

1:24:39

system was always in place the very

1:24:42

similar scoring system has been around

1:24:44

for years I mean there's a little

1:24:45

variation whether it's a road project or

1:24:47

something else but for harisburg I mean

1:24:49

you you're seeing back toback two of the

1:24:50

largest projects we've had in a dozen

1:24:53

years right they're just aren't a lot of

1:24:55

giant multi-million dollar projects here

1:24:57

um which one are you referring to the

1:24:58

stadium and the Broad Street Market I

1:25:00

mean there just aren't multi there

1:25:01

aren't big projects like that coming

1:25:03

through well I'm I'm speaking to I'm

1:25:06

following up with the sentiments that

1:25:08

Council woman RW had $396 million

1:25:11

project in the heart of Harrisburg

1:25:13

Pennsylvania not one local vendor not

1:25:16

even a gopher got a job

1:25:19

here 300 yeah $396 million project not

1:25:24

one person and we had to March around

1:25:27

this building still didn't get a job so

1:25:30

the concern is like you know again no

1:25:33

disrespect to your company when you keep

1:25:35

seeing the same people getting these

1:25:37

projects I got to start thinking about

1:25:39

why are they the only ones getting

1:25:42

them and our job is to stand in Vanguard

1:25:45

for this community and sure is something

1:25:48

that I completely ran on to make sure

1:25:50

that uh local vendors and businesses are

1:25:53

included in economic growth of the city

1:25:55

of Harrisburg so that's that's just my

1:25:58

concern of just seeing this process how

1:26:00

it actually works so that we know that

1:26:03

there really

1:26:05

isn't I would just call it

1:26:07

favoritism all right I'm going to speak

1:26:09

now speak up I I think listen to what

1:26:13

you guys are concerned I Shar the

1:26:16

sentiment

1:26:17

100% okay um being as a minority myself

1:26:22

in the construction industry majority

1:26:24

time that's not another person that

1:26:25

looks like me all right I've been in

1:26:26

Industry going on for 10 years all right

1:26:29

and only I've only met one other black

1:26:31

project manager and that was in the city

1:26:32

of Philadelphia and that's working here

1:26:35

in the state of PA so I understand your

1:26:37

sentiment um but what I would ask add to

1:26:40

that is that you guys are 100% right

1:26:43

that's a process and that's a procedure

1:26:45

that is incorrect and a lot of it comes

1:26:47

down to educational um what you guys are

1:26:50

asking or expecting is for people to

1:26:53

have the opportunity to say at the table

1:26:55

but there many of us lack the education

1:26:57

I'm going to say us because I'm one of

1:26:58

those individuals there as the person

1:27:01

who has owned a business who has worked

1:27:03

in the construction industry here I

1:27:04

don't necessarily have the opportunity

1:27:06

to bid on the project this large give me

1:27:08

a road home oh I can do it give me a fit

1:27:10

out a million dollars sure I could do it

1:27:13

but we're talking about something that

1:27:14

is you know8 10 15 20 I don't know what

1:27:17

the dollar value of this project would

1:27:18

be but that requires a different level

1:27:20

of education and experience that a lot

1:27:22

of us just don't have and so

1:27:25

while we want this to happen I think we

1:27:26

got to go back okay how can we start

1:27:28

educating the community far few in

1:27:31

advance so when opportunities like this

1:27:32

show up here like this is something just

1:27:34

like a year two three years in the works

1:27:36

it takes time to do um I'm right through

1:27:39

with you guys I I I understand I

1:27:42

understand it and it hurts to even hear

1:27:44

a $250 million project so

1:27:46

396 I don't care if it's over a million

1:27:49

dollars like the fact that no one had

1:27:50

the opportunity to sit at the table and

1:27:52

there's plenty of contractors here like

1:27:55

I feel that I feel that um that

1:27:59

particular job was was awarded to a firm

1:28:03

in Pittsburgh Pittsburgh and they

1:28:04

brought their own team and they B their

1:28:06

own team and we were just as frustrated

1:28:09

about that because literally we could

1:28:11

have walked to that site from our office

1:28:13

and we had a plan that was all

1:28:16

inclusive and again we didn't get a

1:28:20

crack at it and it upset us but

1:28:25

and and I and and so if you if you can

1:28:27

feel that sentiment right how do you

1:28:29

think some of these

1:28:31

other uh companies would feel too that

1:28:34

they didn't really get a opportunity and

1:28:37

and and again you guys were just before

1:28:39

us think I would say I would say that

1:28:42

they got an opportunity we all had to go

1:28:44

to the pre bid we all had the same

1:28:46

requirements in the RFP which I so

1:28:48

that's why I want to learn the system so

1:28:50

so we I need to learn that we got the

1:28:52

RFP

1:28:54

I brought I brought it all tonight we we

1:28:55

brought an the RFP that was sent there

1:28:58

were certain guidelines that had to go

1:28:59

by the RFP to make sure you were

1:29:02

responsive bidder we put together a so

1:29:04

you you were a part of the grading no no

1:29:07

no I was part of of of providing a

1:29:09

proposal and we put together a proposal

1:29:13

did you see the other proposals no so

1:29:16

this has really be the first time they'd

1:29:18

be available to someone outside that's

1:29:20

how that works like you know so so say

1:29:23

to me I I hear you Neil but what he's

1:29:25

saying to me is that this is you feel as

1:29:28

though that you were the best qualified

1:29:29

pretty much is what you're saying right

1:29:31

I I think we offered more than other how

1:29:33

if you haven't seen the other ones

1:29:34

because I know I know a lot of these

1:29:35

firms are I know Jonathan B that doesn't

1:29:38

mean anything so so you brought Jonathan

1:29:41

bers he's in the building right now this

1:29:43

man has just been awarded three times in

1:29:46

one year for the work he's done he's

1:29:48

done plenty of work in the city of

1:29:50

Harrisburg

1:29:51

absolutely so the 185 no no no I I know

1:29:55

Jonathan bers I you asked me how I I

1:29:57

know Jonathan bers he doesn't have a

1:29:59

restor a fire restoration group and and

1:30:02

and doesn't do a lot of that type of

1:30:03

historical work same with so you can't I

1:30:05

see has he can sub can

1:30:09

he I'm just saying I have two questions

1:30:13

I wanted to know

1:30:15

um how do we Define most responsible

1:30:19

bidder Mr Baker that's what you referred

1:30:22

to this company as the most responsible

1:30:26

bidder and that we would get the most

1:30:28

bang for our buck is there a definition

1:30:31

for most responsible

1:30:34

bidder I would say the definition I

1:30:36

would use would be a bidder that meets

1:30:38

the qualifications that we're looking

1:30:40

for in the certain criteria that we're

1:30:42

asking so whenever we put that RFP out

1:30:44

and we say we're looking for all these

1:30:46

different criteria we want to see you

1:30:48

know X Y and Z we we look for specific

1:30:50

items and then when we get those

1:30:52

proposals back that's how we grade off

1:30:54

of the proposals and that's how we

1:30:56

decide who the most responsible bidder

1:30:58

is Miss rard I see you shaking your head

1:31:00

are you confirming that there is a

1:31:02

actual definition for most responsible

1:31:05

bidder or you're just affirming what Mr

1:31:08

Baker is saying that his hypothetical

1:31:11

definition I I just to CL that would be

1:31:13

my definition I know it's your

1:31:15

definition that's why I'm asking if no

1:31:17

not Webster's Dictionary something in

1:31:20

the rubric something in what is Define

1:31:23

what is

1:31:24

how is a the most responsible bitter

1:31:28

defined so I don't know if there's a

1:31:30

very specific legal definition but the

1:31:32

way that we defined it for this team the

1:31:35

scoring team was how well the proposals

1:31:38

met the criteria that were listed in the

1:31:44

RFP okay and then I had a comment for Mr

1:31:47

Davis

1:31:49

um I found some of your commentary a

1:31:52

little offensive let's not assume that

1:31:54

everyone lacks education in this

1:31:57

instance it's a lack of opportunity it's

1:32:00

not the education so I just wanted to

1:32:02

clarify that thank

1:32:06

you does any other council members have

1:32:08

any other questions my mic's not on any

1:32:11

questions or

1:32:14

concerns okay well does does anybody

1:32:17

else have anything else to say from the

1:32:18

administration or Alexander and

1:32:21

Cole thank you for the opportunity to

1:32:24

yeah you're welcome thank you for coming

1:32:26

thank you all for coming that concludes

1:32:28

the business of the Parks and Recreation

1:32:30

enrichment committee thank you um I will

1:32:34

entertain a motion to resume the

1:32:36

legislative

1:32:38

session motion moved is there a second

1:32:41

thank you so we returned to the session

1:32:44

uh before us we had resolution 26 of

1:32:47

2024 but I believe chair Ross noted she

1:32:50

would like the resolution to remain in

1:32:52

committee at this time

1:32:55

um I you know I did but you

1:33:00

know what's the process if it remains in

1:33:02

committee it just comes back to another

1:33:04

work session you can bring it out

1:33:07

anytime so some things remain in

1:33:09

committee a year and a half depending on

1:33:10

the complexity right all right I I would

1:33:12

do that because I feel like my my uh

1:33:14

council members need some time to look

1:33:16

at some documents and then I'll converse

1:33:18

with them and have it brought back in

1:33:21

and if and Tiffany from my office

1:33:22

participated in the legal side of these

1:33:24

okay so if you need her available to

1:33:27

walk people through things she can do

1:33:29

that okay you too right okay all right

1:33:33

thank you I assigned her this contract

1:33:36

I'm bouncing off but she's in the weeds

1:33:38

okay right that has to more more to do

1:33:41

with language

1:33:43

right on the documents I our office is

1:33:46

working on the language of the document

1:33:48

right that's what we're trying to get to

1:33:49

I got you

1:33:51

yep thank you is there any old Business

1:33:54

Council Members yes thank you president

1:33:58

Bowers I'd like to make a motion to

1:34:02

revisit resolution

1:34:05

22224 it's it's reconsidered reconsider

1:34:09

uh resolution 22

1:34:12

d224 is there a

1:34:14

second

1:34:17

second the motion on the floor is to

1:34:20

reconsider resolution 22 of 202 four um

1:34:25

council members is there any

1:34:28

discussion yes oh no I don't have okay I

1:34:32

just misread the resolution and want to

1:34:37

yes re vote cash your vote over please

1:34:41

okay so we have resolution 22 of 2024 Mr

1:34:45

trale could you read it just to refresh

1:34:47

everybody's

1:34:49

memory resolution 22 2024 a resolution

1:34:53

ratifying the submission of a Grant

1:34:55

application to the Pennsylvania

1:34:57

Department of Conservation and natural

1:34:58

resources for the purpose of developing

1:35:00

a natural greencape park to be known as

1:35:03

the Tera Street Park thank you assuming

1:35:07

there's no further questions comments or

1:35:09

concerns Mr chel can you please call the

1:35:11

vote on the motion to reconsider which

1:35:13

is not motion to

1:35:18

reconsider yeah on the motion to

1:35:19

reconsider

1:35:22

yes oh okay

1:35:25

Miss

1:35:26

Davis

1:35:28

yes Miss green yes Mr Jones yay Miss

1:35:34

rolls yes Miss Bowers yes resolution 22

1:35:39

2024 passes by a vote of no the motion

1:35:42

to reconsider has passed oh the motion

1:35:45

to reconsider is passed now we can call

1:35:49

it for a formal vote got resolution 22

1:35:53

of 20 24 Mr chel can you please call the

1:35:56

vote Miss Davis yes Miss green yes Mr

1:36:01

Jones yay Miss Rose yes Miss Bowers yes

1:36:06

resolution 22 2024 passes by vote of 5

1:36:08

to zero thank you thank you any new

1:36:12

business council members yes Sor I

1:36:16

was typing away yes very quickly I would

1:36:20

like to go over um some things happen in

1:36:22

Harrisburg this weekend

1:36:25

or Thursday to Sunday and on um so

1:36:30

what's happening in harrisburger family

1:36:31

singles and couples Earth Day Festival

1:36:34

Saturday April the 20th from 12:00 p.m.

1:36:38

to 2:00 p.m. at Reservoir Park

1:36:40

Brownstone there will be info tables

1:36:42

educational sessions beekeepers and

1:36:45

crafts so please come out and join us on

1:36:47

Saturday April the 20th also don't

1:36:50

forget that um The Parks and Recreation

1:36:52

is still holding watercolor painting

1:36:54

class and that ends April 25th and that

1:36:57

is at the reservoir park Brownstone from

1:37:00

Wednesday um on Wednesdays from 11:00

1:37:02

a.m. to 20 to 12:00 p.m. so please don't

1:37:05

miss

1:37:06

out also extreme hip hop Thursdays is

1:37:10

still happening it started April 11th

1:37:12

and it ends May 9th and it will be at

1:37:14

the Reser Park pavilion from 6:00 to 7

1:37:17

p.m. so please don't miss out on all the

1:37:19

great activities that are happening

1:37:21

right now in the city if you would like

1:37:22

more information you can visit

1:37:25

harrisburg.pa doov um for the Flyers and

1:37:29

for any more information that you may

1:37:31

need thank you thank you any other new

1:37:34

business okay seeing and hearing none

1:37:36

the time is 7:39 p.m. I will entertain a

1:37:40

motion to adjourn motion to adjourn is

1:37:43

there a second second thank you we stand

1:37:45

adjourn

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free