0:05
jean-jacques Rousseau wrote the social
0:08
contract in 1762 in France at a time of
0:12
great change the moral authority of
0:16
Kings and the church was being
0:17
continually questioned as was political
0:20
power in general and the world was
0:22
becoming less feudal and increasingly
0:25
global and commercial commenting on
0:28
man's condition in this changing world
0:30
Rousseau starts the social contract with
0:33
his famous lines man is born free and is
0:36
everywhere in chains in a discourse on
0:39
inequality Rousseau had argued that in a
0:42
state of nature man has two innate
0:45
impulses self-preservation what he calls
0:48
amour de soie which means love of self
0:51
and pity or a repugnance towards seeing
0:54
suffering in others he argues that in
0:58
the course of evolution man starts to
1:00
become civilized by comparing himself to
1:03
others through what equals
1:04
perfectibility essentially man's
1:07
capacity for mimicry and development by
1:11
copying others as man enters society
1:14
though this amour de soir the love of
1:17
self transforms into a more prop which
1:20
is a sense of his own self-worth this
1:24
stems from man learning from others but
1:26
simultaneously comparing himself to them
1:29
which diminishes is pity for others
1:31
modern society is defined by amour prop
1:34
to the detriment of man and so
1:36
everywhere he is in Chains comparing
1:39
himself to others at the beginning of
1:42
the social contract Rousseau considers
1:44
three ways of organizing society that
1:47
were part of eighteenth-century
1:48
orthodoxy natural Authority right of the
1:52
strongest and slavery many at the time
1:55
argued that rulers are like parents and
1:58
the ruled like children or that rulers
2:01
are naturally better suited to ruling
2:03
all that if these aren't the case maybe
2:05
the strong should rule just for the sake
2:08
of stability Rousseau makes a number of
2:11
arguments against these
2:13
that seemed obvious to the modern mind
2:15
that children become independent from
2:17
parents or that even the strong can't
2:20
rule with physical strength alone he
2:22
argues that all of these arguments have
2:24
been made after the fact that is they
2:27
have been made to justify the very state
2:29
of affairs that they argue for not the
2:32
other way around none of them fit the
2:34
idea of man in a state of nature with
2:37
just a love of self and pity for others
2:39
so he says that the only way a society
2:43
can be formed is by a covenant a pact a
2:46
social contract he argues that even if
2:50
people choose a leader a social pact
2:53
based on a prior agreement must have
2:56
already been in place to begin the
2:57
decision-making process this is the
3:00
basis of the social contract so the
3:03
question for Rousseau becomes how to
3:06
find a form of Association which will
3:08
defend the person and goods of each
3:11
member with the collective force of all
3:13
and under which each individual while
3:16
uniting himself with others a baised no
3:19
one but himself and remains as free as
3:22
before this is the perennial question of
3:26
political philosophy in entering a
3:28
political community of state you give up
3:31
part of your freedom and submit to laws
3:35
anarchists argued that this is never
3:38
is it possible to prove that it is
3:41
Russo's answer he writes is in the total
3:45
alienation of each associate of himself
3:48
and all his rights to the whole
3:50
community he goes on to say that as
3:53
every individual gives himself
3:55
absolutely the conditions are the same
3:58
for all and precisely because they are
4:01
the same for all it's in no one's
4:03
interest to make the conditions onerous
4:05
for others for Rousseau no one gives up
4:09
their freedom for other individuals but
4:11
for the idea of an equal community the
4:14
community then is an abstract idea that
4:17
is part of the individual it is a
4:19
concept that the individual creates
4:21
rationally for himself Rousseau
4:24
conceptualizes a historical con
4:26
tribution to philosophy and psychology
4:29
this metaphysical community or society
4:33
is what Hegel describes as Geist and
4:36
what Freud takes inspiration from for
4:38
the super-ego it is arguably an inherent
4:42
part of our own psychology for Rousseau
4:45
this social contract should be organized
4:48
by his most famous concept the general
4:51
will it is this concept of a
4:53
metaphysical community directed by the
4:55
general will that his sovereign not a
4:58
king or a parliament in a small
5:01
community each individual will be
5:03
motivated by his amour de soir and his
5:06
pity for others in a community of equals
5:09
none will be motivated by the corrosive
5:12
effects of amour prop as comparing
5:15
himself to others Rousseau is not
5:18
talking about equality of property but
5:21
equality of citizenship and direct
5:23
democracy that you have property on the
5:26
basis that is afforded to you by the
5:29
community the community protects your
5:32
individual rights not the other way
5:35
around to act morally than is to act in
5:38
accordance with the general will of the
5:40
community rather than one's own
5:42
particular individual will for Rousseau
5:45
giving up the freedom of natural Liberty
5:47
leads to a greater civil liberty politic
5:51
should be judged on this basis and leads
5:54
Rousseau to one of his most infamous
5:57
phrases if an individual does not act in
6:00
accordance with the general will which
6:02
remember according to Rousseau would be
6:05
rational for them to do so then they
6:08
should be forced to be free this general
6:11
will is worked out by the simple
6:13
debating and voting of an issue but
6:15
importantly each person should be
6:18
directly involved in the process and so
6:21
Rousseau advocates small states and
6:24
direct democracy where interest groups
6:26
and factionalism would be banned
6:29
Rousseau's fundamental belief was that
6:31
society should be homogeneous which has
6:34
led many to accuse him of being one of
6:36
the intellectual sources for
6:40
hurt him at odds with liberals at the
6:41
time like Voltaire and Montesquieu
6:44
Rousseau then is most aptly described as
6:47
a communitarian thinker rather than a
6:49
liberal obsessed with high individuals
6:52
societies and himself could lead
6:54
cohesive authentic lives he argued that
6:59
in an increasingly individualistic
7:01
society everyone pretends to be working
7:04
for the others profits or reputation
7:06
while only seeking to raise his own
7:08
above them and at their expense it's a
7:12
world where sincere friendship real
7:14
esteem and perfect confidence are
7:16
banished from among men jealousy
7:18
suspicion fear coldness reserved hate
7:22
and fraud like constantly concealed
7:25
Russo's influence and reputation is
7:29
he was a leading contributor to the
7:31
philosophy of the Enlightenment and had
7:33
a major effect on the causes in the
7:35
course of the French Revolution which is
7:37
arguably the defining moment in the
7:39
creation of modern Europe and in some
7:43
way he's influenced almost every
7:45
philosopher who came after him
7:47
ultimately the question in judging
7:50
Rousseau is whether you buy into these
7:52
fundamental observations about human
7:54
nature about pity if you don't then the
7:58
rest of the social contract is unlikely
8:01
to be convincing if you like these
8:05
videos and would like to support me
8:06
making more you can follow me on Twitter
8:09
Instagram and Facebook by clicking the
8:11
links in the description below you can
8:13
like this video and subscribe to the
8:16
then and now channel to see more and if
8:19
you're feeling really generous you can
8:21
pledge as little as a dollar towards the
8:24
creation of each new video you can click
8:26
here to find out more thank you