Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Legislative Session - 12/15/2025

4:29:07EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
0:25

Prior to calling the meeting to order,

0:27

I'd like to conduct our legislative

0:28

caucus. So, following our caucus, I will

0:32

call the meeting to order. Mr. Trudale

0:34

will call the role. The invocation this

0:38

evening will be led by Councilwoman

0:40

Ross, followed by the pledge of allegian

0:42

allegiance, excuse me, which will be led

0:44

by Councilman Rodriguez.

0:47

For communications this evening, we are

0:49

joined by Mr. Cedric Humphrey, the

0:51

assistant city clerk, who will share a

0:54

presentation, city council's year in

0:56

review. We will then move to courtesy of

0:59

the floor followed by the approval of

1:02

minutes for the legislative session that

1:04

occurred on November 25th, 2025 and the

1:08

approval of the minutes for the special

1:11

legislative session that occurred on

1:13

December 9th, 2025.

1:16

Uh you will hear reports from the

1:19

following committees. I will deliver

1:22

um a report from the administration

1:24

committee on the work session of

1:26

December 9th, 2025.

1:29

Vice President Green will deliver a

1:31

report on behalf of the budget and

1:33

finance committee on the work session of

1:35

December 9th, 2025.

1:39

Councilman Jones, our public safety

1:41

chair, will share a report on the work

1:44

session that occurred on December 9th,

1:46

2025.

1:48

and Councilman Rodriguez, our public

1:50

works committee chair, will deliver a

1:53

report on the work session that occurred

1:54

on December 9th, 2025. There are no

1:58

ordinances for first reading. Ordinances

2:00

for amendment, we have bill 12 of 2025,

2:04

bill 13 of 2025, bill 14 of 2025,

2:10

and bill 15 of 2025.

2:13

Ordinances for final passage. Bill 12 of

2:17

2025, Bill 13 of 2025, bill 14 of 2025,

2:23

and bill 15 of 2025.

2:26

We will then move to resolutions. The

2:28

first resolution for consideration is

2:30

resolution 74 of 2025, which we will

2:34

vote upon. Resolution 86 of 2025, we

2:39

will vote upon. Resolution 87 of 2025,

2:43

we will vote upon. Resolution 88 of

2:46

2025, we will vote upon. Resolution 89

2:50

of 2025, we will vote upon resolution 90

2:54

of 2025. We will vote upon resolution 91

2:59

of 2025. We will vote upon and

3:02

resolution 92 of 2025. We will vote

3:06

upon. Is there any old business for

3:08

discussion, council members?

3:11

Okay, seeing and hearing none, any new

3:13

business?

3:15

Okay, Vice President Green, any other

3:17

new business?

3:19

Okay, and then we will adjourn.

3:27

Okay, if everybody is ready to begin,

3:30

the time is 6:08 p.m. I would like to

3:33

call our legislative session to order.

3:38

Mr. Mr. Trudeale, could you please call

3:40

the role?

3:40

>> Miss Daniels.

3:46

>> Miss Daniels.

3:49

>> Miss Davis,

3:50

>> present.

3:52

>> Miss Green,

3:53

>> present.

3:55

>> Mr. Jones,

3:56

>> here.

3:57

>> Miss Rolls,

3:58

>> present.

3:59

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

4:00

>> present.

4:01

>> Miss Hill,

4:02

>> present. The invocation will be led by

4:05

Councilwoman Ross.

4:07

Thank you. Um, President Hill, I just

4:10

want us all to take a moment. Um, the

4:13

holidays are coming up. Uh, the weather

4:16

is getting cold. Um, snowstorms. Just

4:19

thinking of people who are less

4:21

fortunate, who are not excited for the

4:24

holidays and are just trying to get

4:25

through them. Uh, I just want us to take

4:27

a moment and think of everyone in need.

4:30

Um, for a moment, please.

4:36

Thank you.

4:38

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. The pledge

4:40

of allegiance will be led by Councilman

4:43

Rodriguez.

4:44

>> All rise for the pledge. [clears throat]

4:49

>> I pledge allegiance

4:50

>> to the flag of the United States of

4:52

America and to the stands nation

5:00

for all.

5:05

Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. For

5:07

communications this evening, we are

5:09

joined by Assistant City Clerk, Mr.

5:11

Cedric Humphrey, who will share city

5:14

council's year in review. Mr. Humphrey.

5:17

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, like I've

5:19

said, my name is Cedric Humphrey. I'm

5:20

the assistant city clerk and I'm just

5:22

really quickly going to share the 2025

5:24

Harrisburg City Council year in review

5:26

and we'll take a little stroll down

5:27

memory lane as we wrap up this last

5:29

session of the year.

5:32

So, starting out with some committee

5:34

work and legislative highlights. Um, in

5:36

2025, the Harrisburg City Council

5:38

continued its work with a focus on

5:39

oversight, transparency, and

5:41

collaboration. Uh, the committee

5:43

leadership remained as President Hill,

5:44

the chair of the administration

5:46

committee, Vice President Green, Budget,

5:48

and Finance Committee, Councilwoman

5:50

Daniels, Community Economic Development,

5:52

Councilwoman Davis, Building and

5:53

Housing, Councilwoman RWS, Parks,

5:55

Recreation, and Enrichment. Councilman

5:58

Rodriguez, public works, and Councilman

6:00

Jones, public safety. Over the year,

6:02

council completed several key

6:04

legislative actions, including approving

6:06

multiple land development plans,

6:07

including the landmark Penmark project,

6:10

which also required a zoning MACM

6:11

amendment and a public hearing prior to

6:13

its adoption. Filling all boards and

6:15

commissions for which council holds the

6:17

appointing authority, ensuring full and

6:19

effective membership across the

6:20

adversary adversary bodies, authorizing

6:24

routine operational legislation,

6:26

including contracts, appointments, and

6:28

administrative approvals necessary for

6:30

city functions. And tonight, adopting

6:33

the 2026 budget, completing council's

6:35

annual fiscal responsibilities.

6:39

This year, council held several targeted

6:41

policy work sessions to gather

6:43

information, review performance, and

6:45

promote new ideas, and increase

6:47

transparency. The topics included a

6:50

policy work session around the center

6:51

for employment opportunities um

6:53

providing opportunities for supporting

6:54

re-entry and workforce development, a an

6:57

active boards and commissions policy

6:59

work session where we reviewed vacancies

7:01

and the appointment processes and

7:03

ensured that the bodies remain engaged

7:05

in functional and an ARPA spending

7:08

update um a policy work session around

7:10

the status of the remaining allocations

7:12

from bill 5 of 2023 and council received

7:15

progress updates on the currently funded

7:16

projects. These sessions uh strengthen

7:19

council's oversight role and help inform

7:21

decision-making.

7:26

Recognizing our community throughout

7:28

2025, council celebrated residents and

7:30

organizations whose achievements and

7:32

contributions strengthen the cultural,

7:33

athletic, and creative fabric of

7:35

Harrisburg. This year, council proudly

7:37

recognized the Harrisburg boy Smurf

7:40

football team who were a rowdy bunch to

7:42

say the least. if you were here that

7:44

night. The Harrisburg Flea and Open

7:46

Stage Harrisburg. These recognitions

7:49

reflect council's gratitude for the

7:50

individuals and the organizations who

7:52

inspire pride and strengthen our city's

7:54

sense of community.

7:58

This year, we also uh recognized the

8:01

retirement of city clerk Michael Parker

8:03

um and celebrated the kindness and

8:05

positivity and the friendly spirit he

8:07

brought to city hall. He was always

8:08

someone who greeted others with warmth

8:10

and made the workplace feel welcoming.

8:12

and his upbeat attitude, helpfulness,

8:14

and genuine care for the people around

8:15

him made a lasting impression on staff,

8:18

council members, and visitors alike. He

8:20

was a bright spot in the building, and

8:21

his presence will be missed and has

8:24

certainly been missed since we've since

8:26

he's left us.

8:31

Engaging our community council remained

8:34

active and visible throughout the

8:35

community, engaging directly with

8:37

residents through events including a

8:39

town hall series in partnership with the

8:40

Harrisburg School District which

8:42

launched in October to create an open

8:43

forum for conversations on education,

8:46

safety, and community priorities. The

8:48

National African-American Readin at

8:50

Marshall where council members and

8:51

office staff join students and teachers

8:53

in celebrating literacy, culture, and

8:55

black authors. Council also participated

8:58

in the city's annual holiday parade,

9:00

celebrating community pride and holiday

9:02

spirit and as always participated in

9:04

National Night Out where the council

9:06

connected with families, neighbors, and

9:08

law enforcement to support community

9:09

safety and trust building.

9:14

And there were several council supported

9:16

events and initiatives this year as

9:17

well. council proudly supported

9:19

initiatives in citywide events that

9:21

brought residents together, including

9:23

Hotspot Saturdays in its third

9:24

iteration. Uh this year, they removed

9:27

78.4 tons of illegal dumping and as a

9:30

total have now surpassed 200 tons of

9:32

illegal dumping waste that's been

9:34

removed from the city since the

9:35

program's inception. And the program

9:38

also was part of the reason why um there

9:41

was an award, the keep PA award. Um,

9:44

pre-tick-or- treat night as always in

9:46

partnership with the Harrisburg Fire

9:47

Department. The second annual Dez Mingus

9:50

Classic continuing the celebration of a

9:52

beloved coach in the city and supporting

9:54

youth athletics and the SNAP program

9:56

meal distribution where on November 7th,

9:59

uh, Councilman Rodriguez, Craw Daddy's,

10:00

and the public works team fed over 300

10:02

hot meals to residents that had lost

10:04

their staff benefits due to the federal

10:06

shutdown. And all of this work took

10:08

place at our public works building on

10:09

Paxton Street.

10:14

This year, several council members were

10:16

able to attend the National League of

10:17

Cities Conference in Salt Lake City. Uh

10:20

council members represented Harrisburg

10:21

at the 2025 NLC conference where they

10:24

participated in sessions on housing,

10:26

public safety, infrastructure, and

10:28

municipal innovation, engaged with local

10:30

leaders from across the country, shared

10:32

Harrisburg's priorities, and highlighted

10:34

challenges effective with local

10:36

governments. and the attendance at the

10:38

NLC reinforced council's commitment to

10:40

professional development and informed

10:42

policym

10:46

and so looking back at 2025 by the

10:48

numbers this year Harrisburg City

10:50

Council considered 92 resolutions 15

10:53

bills including the 2026 proposed budget

10:55

which will be voted on tonight. There

10:57

were nine land development plans

10:59

approved by council. Altogether, council

11:01

heard over two hours of public comment

11:03

during meetings, which is always my

11:05

favorite thing to go back and look up

11:06

when making this PowerPoint, and held

11:09

three policy work sessions focused on

11:10

employment opportunities, boards and

11:12

commissions, and Bill 5, 2023, ARPA

11:14

spending.

11:17

And like always, Harrisburg City Council

11:19

is nothing without the community that it

11:20

serves. In 2026, we want to hear from

11:22

more residents in the city, more of you.

11:24

So, you can join us for a meeting. Work

11:26

sessions occur every 1 and third Tuesday

11:28

at 5:30 p.m. Legislative sessions every

11:31

second and fourth Tuesday at 6 pm. You

11:34

can follow us on Facebook, Instagram.

11:36

Um, subscribe to the city's YouTube

11:38

channel where all of the meetings are

11:39

streamed. And you can also check out the

11:41

city calendar for exciting events and

11:43

upcoming meetings.

11:47

>> Thank you very much.

11:50

I always look forward to our year in

11:52

review because it's a great reminder of

11:54

the um hard work that we do throughout

11:59

the year. So, thank you very much, Mr.

12:01

Humphrey.

12:01

>> Thank you.

12:02

>> We will now move on with our meeting

12:04

agenda to courtesy of the floor. Just a

12:07

few housekeeping notes before we begin.

12:09

If you're interested in offering any

12:11

public comment, please state your name

12:13

and your address for the meeting record.

12:15

If you don't feel comfortable sharing

12:16

your address, please share the vicinity

12:18

in which you live within the city, you

12:20

will have four minutes to share your

12:22

comments.

12:24

U Mr. Trudale will serve as our

12:26

timekeeper. I think he's going to add a

12:28

timer to the screen and I will begin to

12:31

my right. Is there anyone that would

12:32

like to offer public comment? Okay,

12:35

seeing and hearing no one, anyone in the

12:37

middle section?

12:39

Seeing and hearing no one, anyone to my

12:40

left? Seeing and hearing no one, we will

12:43

move forward with our meeting agenda.

12:46

Next, we have the approval of minutes

12:48

for the legislative session that

12:50

occurred on November 25th, 2025. Council

12:54

members, are there any revisions to

12:56

those meeting minutes?

13:00

Okay, seeing hearing none, the minutes

13:02

stand approved. Next, we have the

13:04

approval of minutes for the legislative

13:06

session or excuse me, the special

13:08

legislative session that occurred on

13:11

uh December 9th, 2025.

13:15

Are there any revisions to those meeting

13:17

minutes?

13:19

Okay, seeing and hearing none, the

13:22

minutes stand approved. We will now move

13:25

forward with reports of committees. I

13:28

will deliver the first report on behalf

13:30

of the administration committee on the

13:32

work session of December 9th, 2025.

13:43

On Tuesday, December 9th, 2025,

13:48

Harrisburg City Council hosted a work

13:50

session. The administration committee

13:52

met to discuss um one bill and two

13:56

resolutions.

13:57

The first bill was bill 15 of 2025, an

14:01

ordinance amending chapter 2-701,

14:05

compensation of elected officials of

14:08

title 2 administrative code to adjust

14:10

the compensation of the elected

14:12

officials of the city of Harrisburg.

14:16

The interim business administrator,

14:19

uh, Mr. Samowski was present to discuss

14:22

the bill. I would like to note for the

14:24

meeting record, Mayor Williams was not

14:26

present to discuss bill 15 of 2025.

14:31

[sighs] Mr. Sowski shared information

14:35

relating to um other mayoral salaries,

14:40

other uh city treasurer salaries, other

14:43

city controller salaries, and other city

14:46

council salaries. Some, not all, of

14:49

which um are part-time roles. Um, of

14:53

course, the mayor salaries that he

14:56

shared are full-time roles, but the

15:00

majority of the remaining salaries um

15:05

are part-time.

15:07

Council members asked questions um

15:11

relating to the bill. Sh some shared uh

15:13

their thoughts on the bill. Uh at the

15:16

time of the work session, I tabled the

15:19

bill. Um at that time we wanted to

15:23

review the document that Mr. Sowski um

15:26

was referencing during his presentation

15:29

of the bill. Um the next day he shared

15:32

it. So that's why you'll see it on our

15:35

uh legislative session agenda this

15:38

evening for a formal vote. Um I

15:40

recommend to my council members to vote

15:43

as you please um on bill 15 of 2025.

15:48

Um, I will be voting no and I will share

15:50

my thoughts later.

15:52

So, that was bill 15 of 2025.

15:56

Next, resolution 86 of 2025, a

15:59

resolution authorizing the city of

16:01

Harrisburg to negotiate and enter into a

16:04

professional services contract with

16:05

Steve Zimmerman to provide access and

16:08

service of the city's historical

16:10

mainframe programming operations and

16:13

related services in the Bureau of

16:15

Information Technology.

16:17

Uh, Mr. Steve Bortner was present to

16:20

discuss resolution 86 of 2025. Mr.

16:25

Bortner serves as the IT director for

16:27

the city of Harrisburg.

16:30

He shared um that Mr. Zimmerman assists

16:33

with the day-to-day operations uh data

16:36

requests on the mainframe. Uh he assists

16:39

with exporting the data from the

16:41

mainframe. Um he noted that Mr. Zimmer

16:46

Mr. Zimmerman's hourly rate in 2025

16:50

um was $100. There is an increase this

16:53

year to $115

16:56

per hour equating to $120,000

17:01

for the year.

17:03

Um there was one question that I asked.

17:06

I asked how long do we anticipate the

17:09

need for Mr. Zimmerman's services? Um as

17:12

we all know this is a recurring

17:14

agreement every year. Um, Mr. Bortner

17:17

noted that he anticipates the need of

17:20

Mr. Zimmerman's services for the full

17:22

year of 2026 and partially um through

17:27

the following year of 2027.

17:31

I encourage my colleagues to support

17:33

resolution 86 of 2025

17:37

um as the city continues to migrate off

17:40

of the um historic main frame.

17:45

Next, resolution 89 of 2025, a

17:49

resolution approving the extension of

17:51

the Broad Street Market lease and

17:53

management agreement between the city of

17:55

Harrisburg and the Broad Street Market

17:58

Alliance.

18:03

Mi solicitor Grover was present to

18:06

discuss resolution 89 of 2025.

18:11

Um

18:12

the request is to extend the current

18:14

lease until December of 2026.

18:18

Um he mentioned a grant for renovation

18:22

of the stone building.

18:25

Um but he also mentioned that a

18:28

long-term plan is needed.

18:32

Meetings will begin in January.

18:35

Questions. Uh council members asked the

18:38

following questions. really relative to

18:41

the tent. Um what is the city paying?

18:44

How long are the are

18:47

we going to pay that rate? Um Mr. uh

18:51

Grover shared that there are three

18:54

separate leases currently present. Um

18:57

one with the tent, one with the land.

19:01

And

19:03

I think it's unfortunate that today a

19:06

wall collapsed at the market. So, it

19:08

seems timely that we're having this

19:10

discussion. I really do hope that

19:12

whatever meetings of smaller groups are

19:15

coming together with either the um Broad

19:18

Street Market Alliance Board, the

19:21

members of the administration that are

19:22

active in the process of the rebuild of

19:25

the market, um members of the public,

19:27

whoever is a part of these meetings, I

19:30

hope that they do begin in January and

19:32

that we have some type of resolve or

19:34

something to share um with members of

19:36

the public, residents, and all lovers of

19:39

the Broad Street circuit. So, I um

19:42

encourage my colleagues to support

19:45

resolution 89 of 2025 as um a means to

19:50

continue this painstaking work of

19:53

rebuilding the broad street market. This

19:56

concludes um the report for the

19:59

administration committee and the work of

20:01

the administration committee for 2025.

20:05

The next report will be delivered by

20:06

Vice President Green, our budget and

20:08

finance committee chair on the work

20:10

session of December 9th, 2025. Vice

20:13

President Green.

20:14

>> Thank you, President Hill. Uh during the

20:16

work session of December 9th, 2025, the

20:19

budget and finance committee met to

20:21

discuss bill 14 of 2025, an ordinance

20:24

amending chapter 5-503 tax abatement and

20:27

exemption of title 5 licensing and

20:29

taxation code to further extend the

20:31

statutory termination date by one year

20:34

to December 31st, 2026. Uh this was

20:37

discussing LERA. Uh we had a

20:39

presentation by Mr. Graves as well as

20:41

Miss Gloria Martin Roberts uh where they

20:44

told us that there was a draft available

20:46

of the new letter uh new letter bill but

20:49

it was with the school being sent to the

20:51

school district and waiting on a

20:52

response. Uh and until we got a response

20:55

back from the school district we

20:56

couldn't move forward because this has

20:57

to be a collaboration between all

20:59

parties. Um and then we also discussed

21:01

resolution 87 of 2025 a resolution

21:04

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

21:06

negotiate and enter into a collective

21:08

bargaining a excuse me. Oh, I'm just

21:10

making stuff up. Um, enter into a

21:12

collection agreement with the city uh

21:14

the Harrisburg school district for the

21:16

collection of the business privilege

21:18

mercantile tax and the amusement tax for

21:19

the 2026 tax year. This is something

21:22

that comes before us every year so that

21:23

we can collect the merkantile and the

21:26

amusement tax for the school district. I

21:28

would ask that my colleagues support

21:30

both bill 14 and resolution 87.

21:35

While

21:37

in December, the budget and finance

21:39

committee also met several times

21:42

throughout the month of December to host

21:43

a series of four budget hearings about

21:45

the proposed city of Harrisburg 2026

21:48

budget. Uh, as we went through each

21:50

department, we had a presentation from

21:52

department heads regarding their

21:53

department goals, demographics, and

21:55

answering any questions council members

21:57

uh presented prior to the presentation.

21:59

Council members also asked

22:00

administration members questions

22:02

regarding their budget and their

22:04

presentation at the budget hearings. I

22:06

would like to thank all department heads

22:08

and the administration for participating

22:09

in the budget hearings as well as my

22:11

colleagues for taking the time to review

22:13

the budget and ask insightful questions

22:14

to ensure transparency for the residents

22:16

of Harrisburg. Uh, I just want to remind

22:19

everyone that in order for Harrisburg to

22:20

move forward, one of the most important

22:22

things we can do is have respectful and

22:23

honest discourse between council and the

22:25

administration because in the end we

22:27

should all have the same goal of making

22:28

Harrisburg better. Uh, we are the

22:30

capital city. We want to make it the

22:31

best place for all who reside here,

22:33

including us. And that concludes my

22:35

presentation. Thank you.

22:37

>> Thank you, Vice President Green.

22:40

The next report will be delivered by

22:42

Councilman Jones, our public safety

22:45

committee chair, on the work session of

22:47

December 9th, 2025.

22:50

>> Thank you, President Hill. On December

22:52

9th of 2025, the public safety committee

22:55

held a work session where we discuss

22:58

resolution 92 of 2025. Resolution 92 of

23:02

2025 is a resolution approving,

23:05

adopting, and placing into immediate

23:07

effect Dolphin County 2025 emergency

23:10

operations plan as the official

23:13

emergency operations plan of the city of

23:15

Harrisburg.

23:17

President to discuss resolution 92 of

23:19

2025 was senior deputy chief chief

23:22

Michael Solder. Uh we discussed uh we

23:26

talked about the need for this emergency

23:28

operations plan. We discuss how local,

23:31

county, and state government would

23:33

implement this plan being on the same

23:34

page with shared information. Also, as

23:38

this resolution is passed, it will allow

23:40

uh certain funding dollars to roll in.

23:43

In that regard, uh council really had no

23:46

questions. Most of my colleagues

23:48

understood the resolution and the need

23:50

for it thereof. Deputy Chief Solder was

23:53

was thanked for his presentation and

23:56

explanation of it. And this will

23:58

conclude the business of the public

23:59

safety committee. And again, I would ask

24:01

my colleagues to support resolution 92

24:04

of 2025.

24:06

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. The final

24:08

committee report you will hear this

24:10

evening will be delivered by our public

24:13

works committee chair, Councilman

24:14

Rodriguez, on the work session of

24:17

December 9th, 20125.

24:20

>> Thank you, Madam President. And um

24:22

please bear with me to my colleagues and

24:24

those in attendance. I'd like to

24:26

consolidate just my point of view of the

24:28

budget hearings uh in collaboration with

24:30

my report. Over the past several weeks,

24:33

city council has dedicated a significant

24:35

amount of time and energy reviewing the

24:37

administration's budget and evaluating

24:39

its vision for a more fiscally

24:41

responsible city of Harrisburg. Before

24:44

sharing my remarks, I want to formally

24:46

commend my colleagues on council for

24:47

your leadership throughout the process.

24:49

Council, I applaud you. The public is

24:52

not always aware of the long hours

24:53

involved during budget season. Twice

24:55

during this process, I found myself

24:57

getting home after midnight, and I would

24:59

do it all again for the residents of the

25:01

city. I cannot forget the

25:03

administration's prep preparation and

25:05

the presentation of the city's proposed

25:07

2026 budget. A huge thank you to our

25:10

city clerk's office, our city clerk, Mr.

25:12

Jared Trudale, and deputy or assistant

25:14

clerk, Mr. Humphre, for everything from

25:17

working on the fly to ensuring we were

25:19

accommodated. They didn't miss a beat.

25:21

And I have to thank you gentlemen on the

25:22

record for your efforts. Still, I'd be

25:25

remiss not to acknowledge every

25:26

department's director and staff for

25:29

taking the time to stay late on occasion

25:30

to share this information. Passing a

25:33

budget that serves more than 50,000

25:35

residents and countless businesses is no

25:37

small task. It requires us to set aside

25:40

our interest and approach this work

25:41

collectively with the responsibility to

25:44

represent every ward and every precinct

25:46

in our city. This process demands that

25:48

we put aside ambitions, considerations,

25:51

or differences and focus solely on

25:53

making the best possible effort for the

25:55

people of Harrisburg. So, in addition to

25:58

the budget itself, Bill 12 of 2025, one

26:01

of the most discussed matters for us has

26:03

been Bill 15 of 2025, an ordinance

26:06

amending chapter 2-71

26:08

of the administrative code to adjust

26:11

compensation of elected officials in the

26:12

city of Harrisburg.

26:14

I want to be clear, this process has not

26:17

been perfect. I would have welcomed the

26:19

presence of Madame Mayor during the

26:21

certain discussions to address some of

26:22

the difficult questions raised,

26:24

particularly regarding the timing of the

26:26

legislation and how such adjustments may

26:29

impact future candidates for public

26:31

office. At times, discussions became

26:34

personal and I believe that energy could

26:35

have been better redirected toward the

26:37

public interest. For me, this is not

26:40

about an increase or decrease in my

26:41

salary. The residents of this city as

26:43

well as this council know I've

26:45

personally given portions of my salary

26:47

for the residents on more than one

26:48

occasion and would happily do it again.

26:51

As with any legislative process, there's

26:53

always room for improvements, stronger

26:55

collaboration, and better communication.

26:57

And I pray the proceedings to follow

26:59

this evening are a demonstration of

27:01

such. That said, my responsibility as a

27:04

councilman is not to govern based on

27:06

personal feeling or opinions alone, but

27:09

to reflect the voices of the people we

27:10

serve. Throughout this budget season,

27:13

I've listened closely to residents,

27:15

former officials, and business leaders

27:17

who share thoughtful and informative

27:19

perspectives on both the budget and the

27:21

proposed compensation adjustments.

27:24

Former city councilman and Harrisburg

27:25

resident, Mr. Bruce Weber spoke to the

27:28

importance of increasing compensation

27:30

for elected officials and referenced

27:31

earlier efforts alongside Dr. Eric

27:34

Waters to pursue similar legislation

27:36

just years ago. Also, Dr. Waters himself

27:39

has publicly announced how such

27:41

adjustments can be critical to

27:43

attracting and retaining qualified,

27:45

committed leadership for the future of

27:46

our city. Additionally, Mr. Ed Jarrick,

27:49

a Harrisburg resident and local business

27:51

owner, noted that the last mayor's

27:53

compensation adjustment occurred in

27:55

around 2013. When accounting for

27:57

inflation and cost of living increases

27:59

over more than a decade, the proposed

28:01

adjustments align closely with what

28:04

could be considered modest and

28:05

reasonable annual increased over time.

28:08

As the capital city of Pennsylvania, it

28:10

is appropriate that the leadership

28:12

structure reflects both responsibility

28:14

and accountability. We also heard from

28:16

Henry Hill, a Harrisburg resident and

28:18

member of the Intergovernmental

28:20

Cooperation Authority. Mr. Hill

28:22

acknowledged the transparency of this

28:24

year's budget process and commended

28:26

council for its thorough questioning and

28:28

public engagement. While the A's formal

28:30

report will follow the budget's uh

28:32

passage, his insight was both valuable

28:35

and constructive. Furthermore, the

28:37

people of city of Harrisburg entrusted

28:39

us with their votes with the expectation

28:41

that we would make decisions not only

28:43

for today, but for the long-term health

28:45

of this city. Every administrative and

28:48

legislative actions carries both

28:50

positive and negative consequences, and

28:52

is our duty to weigh those outcomes

28:53

carefully. As an elected official, I

28:57

must put aside I and continue to think

28:59

about Harrisburg, not just in the

29:01

present moment or who holds a current

29:03

seat, but 10, 20, and 30 years into the

29:06

future. I must also acknowledge the past

29:08

mayors, councils, council members,

29:11

treasurers, controllers, and public

29:12

servants who laid the groundwork that

29:14

would even us allow us to have the

29:16

conversation here today. At the same

29:18

time, I must prioritize, and I have to

29:20

reiterate this, I must prioritize the

29:23

residents who keep this city functioning

29:25

every day. I believe the council's

29:27

objective is to make decisions that

29:29

support Harrisburg's continued economic

29:31

recovery, sustained growth, and eventual

29:34

exit from Act 47. I pray the decisions

29:37

we make today will leave behind a

29:39

stronger capital city for future

29:41

grandchildren, both yours and mine. Now,

29:43

with committee business. First and

29:45

foremost, I'd like to celebrate

29:46

Councilwoman Shemaine Daniels, who I

29:49

believe may be presiding over her final

29:51

council meeting tonight if all goes well

29:52

with the budget. Um, thank you,

29:54

Councilwoman Daniels. Your service for

29:56

over a decade is an accomplishment to

29:58

celebrate. Thank you for your unique

30:00

perspective and approach to being a

30:01

legislator. On December 9th of 2025, the

30:05

public works committee met to discuss

30:06

three resolutions. Resolution 88 of

30:09

2025, Resolution 90 of 2025, and

30:13

Resolution 91 of 2025. Joining us were

30:16

Director David West, Deputy Director

30:18

Kevin Jackson, and department manager

30:20

Mr. John Watson. Questions from the

30:23

council were minimal, but there were

30:24

many salutations and congratulations to

30:26

the public works department for their

30:28

ongoing excellent work. Some statements

30:31

from the council expressed appreciation

30:32

that we can ensure students are

30:34

traveling safely to and from school when

30:36

it's icy due to the benefits of

30:38

resolution 90 of 2025 and noted that the

30:41

department continues to generate revenue

30:43

under resolution 91 of 2025. The

30:46

committee chair moved to have all three

30:48

resolutions on the floor this evening

30:49

for a vote and I ask my colleagues to

30:51

support them in the affirmative. That

30:53

concludes the report from the public

30:55

works committee from the work session of

30:57

129 of 2025 and happy holidays and thank

31:00

you to everyone.

31:02

>> Thank you Councilman Rodriguez. We don't

31:04

have any ordinances for first reading.

31:07

If everybody is

31:10

your pleasure, I would like to move to

31:12

resolutions before um discussing the

31:15

ordinances for amendment and ordinances

31:17

for final passage. So we will move to

31:20

resolutions. The first resolution for

31:22

consideration this evening is resolution

31:24

74 of 2025. Mr. Trudale, could you

31:28

please read it into the record?

31:30

Resolution 74 2025, a resolution

31:33

approving the preliminary/final land

31:35

development plan for 333 Market Street

31:38

submitted by Bradley Jones of Harristown

31:40

Development Corporation to convert

31:42

vacant office space into residential

31:44

units and associated site and access

31:46

improvements.

31:47

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

31:49

any final questions? comments or

31:51

concerns related to resolution 74 of

31:55

2025?

31:57

>> Yeah, I have a question. Um, Councilman

31:59

Jones,

31:59

>> was council um

32:02

I know you guys had asked for something

32:05

from Mr. Jones, some more information. I

32:07

know we were tied up 33. Did everybody

32:09

get what they needed?

32:11

>> It's my understanding I only received a

32:14

letter from Mr. Jones and I don't think

32:16

it provided the clarity that was

32:18

requested.

32:19

So, I will be voting no on resolution 74

32:24

of 2025.

32:27

>> Okay. Yeah. You know, I was a I was a

32:29

yes vote on this, but I know I wanted my

32:31

colleagues to make sure they had

32:33

clarity. So, I mean, I guess the vote's

32:35

going to be what it's going to be. Um,

32:39

>> okay.

32:39

>> All right. That's it.

32:40

>> Okay. Thank you. Any other questions,

32:43

comments, or concerns related to

32:45

resolution 74 of 2025?

32:50

As I mentioned, I will be voting no. Um,

32:52

my concern lies

32:56

um with the lack of information

32:59

regarding the third party that will be

33:01

involved. Um, so I will be voting no.

33:04

Mr. Tuzale, could you please call the

33:06

vote?

33:08

>> Miss Daniels.

33:10

>> Yes.

33:14

>> One more time. We saw you take yourself

33:15

off mute, but the sound didn't come

33:17

through.

33:17

>> I'm off mute. I'm off mute. Let's say

33:19

yes.

33:22

>> Can you hear me?

33:22

>> Yep. Now we can.

33:26

>> Miss Daniels,

33:28

>> yes.

33:29

>> There you go. Miss Davis,

33:31

>> no.

33:33

>> Miss Green,

33:35

>> yes.

33:36

>> Mr. Jones,

33:38

>> yay.

33:40

>> Miss Rose,

33:41

>> yes.

33:42

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

33:43

>> yes.

33:45

>> Miss Hill,

33:46

>> no.

33:47

Resolution 74 2025 passes by a vote of 4

33:51

to three.

33:52

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 86 of

33:55

2025. Mr. Trudeale, could you please

33:58

read it into the record?

34:10

>> It was 5 to2.

34:12

>> I I thought Davis said no or

34:14

Councilwoman Davis said no.

34:15

>> She did. She we both said no.

34:18

>> And then rolls.

34:19

>> She said yes.

34:20

>> My apologies. Clarification. The vote

34:22

passed by a vote of five to two.

34:25

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 86 of

34:29

2025. Mr. Trudale, could you please read

34:32

it into the record?

34:34

Resolution 86, 2025, a resolution

34:37

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

34:38

negotiate and enter into a professional

34:40

services contract with Steve Zimmerman

34:42

to provide access and service of the

34:44

city's historical mainframe,

34:46

programming, operations, and related

34:48

services in the Bureau of Information

34:50

Technology.

34:51

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

34:53

any final questions, comments, or

34:55

concerns related to resolution 86 of

34:58

2025?

35:00

Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr. Mr.

35:01

Trudeale, could you please call the

35:02

vote?

35:03

>> Miss Daniels,

35:05

>> yes.

35:07

>> Miss Davis,

35:08

>> yes.

35:09

>> Miss Green,

35:10

>> yes.

35:12

>> Mr. Jones,

35:13

>> yay.

35:15

>> Miss Rolls,

35:16

>> yes.

35:17

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

35:18

>> yes.

35:20

>> Miss Hill,

35:22

>> yes.

35:23

>> Resolution 86, 2025 passes by vote of 7

35:26

to zero.

35:28

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 87 of

35:32

2025. Mr. Trudale, could you please read

35:35

it into the record?

35:36

>> Resolution 87 2025, a resolution

35:39

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

35:41

negotiate and enter into a collection

35:42

agreement with the Harrisburg School

35:44

District for the collection of the

35:46

business privilege and mercantile tax in

35:48

the amusement tax for the 2026 tax year.

35:53

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

35:54

any uh final questions, comments, or

35:57

concerns related to resolution 87 of

36:00

2025?

36:02

>> Okay, seeing and hearing none, Mr.

36:03

Trudeale, could you please call the

36:05

vote?

36:05

>> Miss Daniels,

36:07

>> yes.

36:08

>> Miss Davis,

36:10

>> yes.

36:11

>> Miss Green,

36:12

>> yes.

36:13

>> Mr. Jones,

36:14

>> yay.

36:15

>> Miss Rolls,

36:16

>> yes.

36:17

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

36:18

>> yes.

36:20

>> Miss Hill,

36:21

>> yes. Resolution 87 2025 passes by voted

36:25

7 to zero.

36:27

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 88 of

36:30

2025. Mr. Trudeale, could you please

36:33

read it into the record? Resolution 88

36:36

2025, a resolution authorizing the city

36:38

of Harrisburg to negotiate and enter

36:40

into an intergovernmental cooperation

36:42

agreement with the Commonwealth of

36:43

Pennsylvania Department of General

36:45

Services for the purpose of authorizing

36:47

the city to provide municipal solid

36:49

waste refuge, industrial, lunchroom,

36:51

office waste, and recycling collection

36:53

and disposal services for designated DGs

36:56

facilities within the city.

36:59

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

37:01

any final questions, comments, or

37:03

concerns related to resolution 88 of

37:05

2025?

37:07

Okay, seeing seeing and hearing none,

37:09

Mr. Chel, could you please call the

37:11

vote?

37:12

>> Miss Daniels,

37:14

>> yes.

37:16

>> Miss Davis,

37:17

>> yes.

37:18

>> Miss Green,

37:19

>> yes.

37:20

>> Mr. Jones,

37:22

>> yay.

37:23

>> Miss Rolls,

37:24

>> yes.

37:25

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

37:26

>> yes.

37:27

>> Miss Hill,

37:28

>> yes. Resolution 88 2025 passes by voted

37:32

7 to zero.

37:34

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 89 of

37:37

2025. Mr. Trudale, could you please read

37:39

it into the record?

37:43

>> Resolution 89 2025, a resolution

37:46

approving the extension of the Broad

37:47

Street Market lease and management

37:49

agreement between the city of Harrisburg

37:51

and the Broad Street Market Alliance.

37:53

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

37:55

any final questions, comments, or

37:57

concerns related to resolution 89 of

38:00

2025?

38:01

>> Uh, yes, Madam President.

38:03

>> Councilman Rodriguez,

38:04

>> I just had a question for legal. Um,

38:06

Solicitor Grover, are there any updates

38:09

yet on the current uh state of the brick

38:12

building in regards to what happened

38:14

today? Um, I'm just not sure if that

38:17

information would be pertinent to the

38:20

lease. I don't think it's pertinent to

38:22

the lease because they're not

38:23

controlling the Rick building until it's

38:26

repaired. Right. Right. Um the update as

38:28

far as I know is that uh the engineers

38:30

and architects were out there today

38:33

because we have an insurance carrier.

38:35

They have an engineer had been involved

38:36

previously. They're coming back to

38:38

Harrisburg this week. Uh I think with

38:40

the with the engineers that we have uh

38:43

and they will have a report as I

38:44

understand it tentatively on Thursday. I

38:47

just wanted to ensure that we were doing

38:49

our due diligence to see if this would

38:51

stagnate the process at all or how this

38:53

would play into anything.

38:55

>> The lease really is about um

38:57

>> the land or

38:58

>> Well, no, it's about the stone building

39:00

and a grant from the Commonwealth to do

39:02

some renovations there that they need a

39:04

full year's lease in order to move

39:05

forward.

39:06

>> Okay. Thank you. Nothing further, Madam

39:08

President.

39:09

>> Thank you. Are there any other

39:10

questions, comments, or concerns related

39:12

to resolution 89 of 2025? Okay. is

39:16

seeing and hearing now. Mr. Trudeale,

39:18

could you please call the vote?

39:19

>> Miss Daniels,

39:22

>> yes.

39:24

>> Miss Davis,

39:25

>> yes.

39:27

>> Miss Green,

39:28

>> yes.

39:29

>> Mr. Jones,

39:32

>> Miss Rolls,

39:33

>> yes.

39:34

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

39:36

>> yes.

39:36

>> Miss Hill,

39:37

>> yes.

39:39

>> Resolution 89 2025 passes by vot 7 to

39:42

zero.

39:44

>> Thank you. Next we have resolution 90 of

39:47

2025. Mr. Trudeale, could you please

39:50

read it into the record?

39:55

Resolution 90 2025, a resolution

39:58

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

39:59

negotiate and enter into a memorandum of

40:01

understanding with the Harrisburg School

40:03

District to provide salt to the school

40:05

district at a price of $125 per ton

40:08

during the 2025 2026 winter season.

40:14

Thank you. Council members, are there

40:16

any final questions, comments, or

40:18

concerns related to resolution 90 of

40:20

20125?

40:22

Seeing and hearing none, Mr. Trudeale,

40:24

could you please call the vote?

40:26

>> Miss Daniels,

40:29

>> yes.

40:30

>> Miss Davis,

40:31

>> yes.

40:32

>> Miss Green,

40:34

>> yes.

40:35

>> Mr. Jones,

40:38

>> yay.

40:40

>> Miss Rolls,

40:41

>> yes.

40:42

Mr. Rodriguez,

40:43

>> yes.

40:44

>> Miss Hill,

40:45

>> yes.

40:46

>> Resolution 90 2025 passes by vot 7 to

40:50

zero.

40:50

>> Thank you. Next, we have resolution 91

40:53

of 2025. Mr. Trudale, could you please

40:56

read it into the record?

40:59

>> Resolution 91205,

41:01

a resolution authorizing the renewal of

41:03

a services agreement with Penn Waste

41:05

Incorporated to continue to serve as the

41:07

city's single stream recycling disposal

41:10

service.

41:12

Thank you. Council members, are there

41:13

any final questions, comments, or

41:15

concerns related to resolution 91 of

41:18

2025?

41:20

Seeing and hearing none, Mr. Trudale,

41:22

could you please call the vote?

41:23

>> Miss Daniels,

41:25

>> yes.

41:26

>> Miss Davis,

41:28

>> yes.

41:29

>> Miss Green,

41:30

>> yes.

41:32

>> Mr. Jones,

41:33

>> yay.

41:34

>> Miss Rolls,

41:35

>> yes.

41:36

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

41:38

>> yes.

41:38

>> Miss Hill,

41:39

>> yes. Resolution 91 2025 passes by vote

41:43

of 7 to zero.

41:45

>> Thank you. Our final resolution for this

41:48

evening is resolution 92 of 2025. Mr.

41:52

Trudeell, could you please read it into

41:54

the record?

41:55

>> Resolution 92 2025, a resolution

41:58

approving, adopting, and placing into

42:00

immediate effect the Dolphin County 2025

42:02

emergency operations plan as the

42:04

official emergency operations plan of

42:06

the city of Harrisburg.

42:08

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

42:10

any final questions, comments, or

42:11

concerns related to resolution 92 of

42:14

2025?

42:16

Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr. Trudale,

42:18

could you please call the vote?

42:20

>> Miss Daniels,

42:22

>> yes.

42:23

>> Miss Davis,

42:25

>> yes.

42:26

>> Miss Green,

42:27

>> yes.

42:28

>> Mr. Jones,

42:30

>> yay.

42:31

>> Miss Rolls,

42:32

>> yes.

42:33

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

42:34

>> yes.

42:35

>> Miss Hill,

42:36

>> yes. Resolution 92 2025 passes by votes

42:40

7 to zero.

42:43

>> Thank you.

42:45

Okay. So we are going to begin with the

42:49

ordinances for amendment. I'd like to

42:52

begin with bill 12 of 2025. Mr. Trudale,

42:57

could you please read it into the

42:58

record?

43:00

Bill 12, 2025, an ordinance establishing

43:03

the budget for the municipal government

43:05

of the city of Harrisburg for the year

43:07

2026.

43:09

>> Thank you. I would like to um I will

43:11

entertain a motion to suspend the rules

43:13

for discussion.

43:14

>> So move.

43:15

>> Is there a second?

43:16

>> Second. Thank you.

43:19

>> I'd like to invite Mr. McCutchen to the

43:21

microphone. Is this appropriate for the

43:23

other funds discussion?

43:27

>> Okay. Thank you.

43:30

I will defer to our budget and finance

43:32

committee chair, Vice President Green,

43:34

to lead discussion.

43:35

>> Thank you very much. Good evening, Mr.

43:37

McCutchen. Uh I know you said that you

43:39

wanted to take some time just to go over

43:41

um city fund balances and things like

43:44

that. So, if you'd like to go over that,

43:46

we are here for your pleasure.

43:49

>> Okay. All right. Very good. Thank you,

43:51

uh Vice President Green. Um Thank you,

43:54

President Hill. Uh good evening,

43:56

everyone. City Council members, Brian

43:58

McCutchen, accounting manager, budget

44:00

and finance. And just a real quick

44:03

update and um I wanted to actually

44:06

prepare a schedule summary to distribute

44:08

to council members today, but there was

44:12

additional refine um proofing work

44:14

associated with uh some of the uh the

44:17

budget information. uh relative to the

44:20

the current year 2025. Uh the the two

44:23

main funds of course include the general

44:24

fund and neighborhood services. And for

44:27

the general fund right now it's still

44:30

it's it's very rough because there are

44:32

ongoing revenue that's coming in quite

44:34

significant revenue and we still have to

44:36

process uh two check runs and two

44:41

payrolls before the end of this month.

44:43

But right now what I'm seeing is

44:45

approximately for year-to- date revenue

44:47

for the general fund will be and again

44:50

this is a projection

44:52

uh 80.2 million versus

44:56

uh anywhere between 76 and 77 million in

45:00

e expenses. Um so that works out to

45:03

anywhere between three and $4 million of

45:06

net revenue for the year which of course

45:08

is a

45:09

a favorable thing to report. um what

45:13

that does to uh the city's cash fund

45:15

balance. Based on that, we we should be

45:18

somewhere around 21 to 20 21.5 million

45:22

by the end of the year for the general

45:25

fund.

45:27

Uh and and in in a comparable way for

45:29

neighborhood services. Um and again that

45:33

includes

45:35

uh the mainly the the city's trash

45:37

collecting collection revenue sources

45:39

and involving the the three burrows. But

45:42

right now what I'm seeing is

45:44

approximately a break even result for

45:46

the year uh where where revenue will

45:49

approximate

45:51

uh 21.9 million uh versus the same

45:54

amount in uh in expense. So that would

45:57

get us somewhere around 5.5 million in

46:01

cash fund balance for the neighborhood

46:02

service fund uh by year end.

46:07

So what I can do that the the schedule

46:09

or or summary schedule I had in mind to

46:11

distribute to you I'm I'm going to of

46:13

course keep pushing to work on that and

46:15

I can distribute that to you uh

46:17

hopefully before the end of this week

46:18

just to give you a better a better solid

46:21

update. So thank you for that.

46:24

>> Thank you very much Mr. McCutchen. I

46:26

appreciate your diligence. Um, I think

46:27

that's useful information as we're

46:29

evaluating the 2026 proposed budget. So,

46:32

thank you for that.

46:33

>> Shall I move into amendments or did you

46:34

want to go first?

46:37

>> All right. I will turn it back over to

46:39

President Hill.

46:40

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. I will

46:42

entertain a motion to resume our

46:44

legislative session.

46:46

>> So moved.

46:47

>> Is there a second?

46:48

>> Second.

46:49

>> Thank you. We will now move to Bill 15

46:52

of 2025.

46:57

Mr. Trudeale, could you please read it

46:58

into the record?

47:02

>> Bill 15, 2025, an ordinance amending

47:05

chapter 2-701,

47:07

compensation of elected officials of

47:10

title 2 administrative code to adjust

47:12

the compensation of the elected

47:13

officials of the city of Harrisburg.

47:17

>> President,

47:18

>> yes. that you still had a bill on the

47:20

floor and open when you moved to this

47:22

one without asking for amendments to it.

47:25

>> Well, we have to we have to act on bill

47:28

15 prior to amendments to the budget is

47:30

my understanding.

47:31

>> Yeah, I think just to formally table

47:34

bill 12 for the moment because you got

47:36

two open bills on the floor.

47:37

>> Okay, I'll move to table bill 12 of 2025

47:42

for the moment.

47:43

>> So,

47:44

>> thank you.

47:46

Okay. So, before us we have one bill,

47:49

bill 15 of 2025,

47:52

which Mr. Trudale just read into the

47:54

record. Council members, are there any

47:57

final questions, comments, or concerns

48:00

related to Bill 15 of 2025?

48:06

>> Uh, I do have um

48:10

a statement more than a concern.

48:12

>> Sure, Councilwoman Ross. So, bill bill

48:14

bill 15 which speaks about the

48:16

compensation of elected officials which

48:19

I know is a huge topic. Um

48:25

when I first um heard the bill,

48:29

I initially definitely um in my mind

48:31

thought yes, I think separating

48:36

the person from the seat. Uh

48:41

a raise is necessary and speaking of the

48:44

mayor seat and other elected officials.

48:48

um even in the treasurer's department

48:50

where they've just now resumed hours to

48:53

4 pm

48:56

and then um

49:01

I got an overwhelming amount of emails

49:03

from my constituents, my the residents

49:07

of Harrisburg who feel there should be

49:10

no raises. Our city is in distress.

49:14

um

49:16

the way our city looks, the way our city

49:18

feels,

49:20

that money could be used in a better

49:21

way. Although it is a small portion

49:23

which um interim acting business

49:26

administrator um Mr. Sooski sent us and

49:29

said it's only $65,000

49:31

out of the $88 million budget. Small,

49:35

yes, but couldn't that money be used

49:38

somewhere else? Um, another thing, I

49:42

never asked for a raise as a council

49:45

member. Um, I'm not here in this seat

49:48

for the money. I'm here to help the

49:50

residents of Harrisburg to be their

49:52

voices, which why they elected me

49:55

was because where they are not speaking,

49:58

I am. When they are rooms, not in rooms

50:02

that I am in, I am speaking. Like now,

50:04

everybody in the city is not here. Not

50:07

even a portion of the residents are, but

50:11

they still reached out in their own

50:12

voice and asked no.

50:16

So for me,

50:19

although yes, I do believe setting aside

50:22

the mayor seat other than all the other

50:25

elected officials, that seat does need a

50:27

raise. But now is not the time and my

50:29

residents of Harrisburg have said that.

50:32

So when they reach out to me and say no

50:35

or yes, I vote the way that they asked

50:38

me to because they placed me in that

50:41

this seat for that reason. So I didn't

50:45

want anyone to assume or guess or make

50:48

believe on why my answer was no. I

50:50

wanted to speak on why I'm voting no

50:53

tonight. why I've changed my mind is

50:55

because the residents of Harrisburg who

50:58

reached out to me have asked me to and

51:02

I believe in

51:05

what they need for the city and what we

51:07

need for the city and I will be voting

51:09

no on bill 15 cuz one I don't need a

51:12

raise and I haven't asked for one and

51:14

two the residents of Harrisburg want

51:16

better for this city and I agree with

51:18

them and I will stand with them on that.

51:20

That's it for me.

51:22

Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Councilman

51:24

Jones.

51:26

>> Yeah, thank you Council President Hill.

51:28

Um, yeah, my my no is still the same.

51:30

Um, I just wanted to reiterate and to

51:32

follow up with uh Councilwoman Ross and

51:35

Council President Hills had addressed

51:37

it. This is something that council did

51:38

not ask for. um you know uh but you know

51:42

I can get it on both sides that um

51:45

inflation all of these different things

51:47

that we're going we're dealing with um

51:50

as a city and as individuals when it

51:52

comes to pay. Um but again I just don't

51:56

think um that we're operating properly.

51:58

our process isn't isn't correct and um

52:01

that's why my no is that um again not to

52:05

you know shun my colleagues or anything

52:08

uh but I just don't think that this is

52:10

the right time um and I will be willing

52:12

to revisit this at a later date just not

52:15

today so again I'm sticking with my no

52:18

>> thank you Councilman Jones any other

52:22

questions comments or concerns related

52:25

to Bill 15 of 2025 Yes. Thank you,

52:29

President Hill.

52:30

>> Sure.

52:31

>> Thank you everyone

52:33

um for your comments and good evening.

52:37

The issue of salary adjustments for

52:40

elected officials has been revisited

52:43

on several occasions. Yet compensation

52:46

has remained unchanged for roughly two

52:50

decades.

52:52

With salary increases being planned in

52:55

the 2026 budget, my focus is

52:58

specifically on the proposed salaries of

53:01

the mayor and council. While I do not

53:05

support the large increases that are

53:07

being suggested, I believe a measured

53:10

adjustment is reasonable.

53:13

Given the passage of time and the

53:16

evolving responsibilities of city

53:19

leadership, I believe it is appropriate

53:22

to act on this initiative now while

53:26

maintaining a conservative approach.

53:31

With that said, I make a motion to amend

53:34

I don't know if this is I need to make a

53:36

motion, but amend the proposed budget

53:40

to establish the 2026 salary for the

53:44

mayor at $90,000

53:48

and council members at $22,250

53:54

each.

53:55

This proposal is designed to acknowledge

53:59

the mayor's role by setting compensation

54:03

at a level consistent with other third

54:08

class cities across Pennsylvania.

54:12

The proposed $90,000 salary places

54:15

Harrisburg's mayor in line with

54:20

comparable municipalities.

54:24

This proposal is also designed to

54:26

maintain council salaries responsibly at

54:30

$22,250.

54:34

Harrisburg's council members already

54:36

earn more than their counterparts in

54:39

other thirdclass cities where council

54:42

service is also part-time but full-time

54:46

responsibilities.

54:49

This adjustment

54:51

acknowledges that reality

54:55

while still recognizing the value of our

54:58

work, ensuring compensation remains fair

55:03

without moving into overly generous

55:07

increases.

55:10

This amendment represents a careful and

55:13

balanced step forward. It provides a

55:16

modest adjustment after two decades

55:19

without change while ensuring that

55:22

compensation remains appropriate given

55:26

Harrisburg's position as a capital city

55:30

relative to other thirdclass

55:32

municipalities.

55:34

Rather than pursuing larger increases,

55:37

this proposal offers a measured solution

55:41

that supports fairness.

55:44

acknowledges the responsibilities of

55:47

city leadership and enforces the city's

55:51

commitment to fiscal responsibility.

55:56

Thank you.

55:58

Is there a second? There is a motion

56:03

to amend on the table. Is there a

56:06

second?

56:09

Okay.

56:15

I will just add my discussion in. Um

56:17

>> Okay, that's fine.

56:18

>> Just kind of comments. Um this isn't a

56:21

new discussion as far as increasing

56:23

compensation for elected officials. Um

56:26

it's been talked about for several years

56:28

by several different elected officials.

56:30

Um, and I've I've heard from many

56:31

residents who feel like there should be

56:33

an increase to the salaries of elected

56:35

officials uh for the work that's being

56:37

done, but then also to ensure that

56:40

it is comparable and competitive to to

56:43

our surrounding regions. Um,

56:47

I think that it's important that as we

56:48

look at this, we have to separate people

56:50

from positions. Uh, not just the mayoral

56:53

position, but also council positions,

56:55

treasurers positions. uh and understand

56:59

that even if you're not the biggest fan

57:00

of some of the elected officials that

57:02

the residents have chosen to vote these

57:04

people in. So it's not like we're making

57:06

the choice of who takes the seat. Um so

57:09

I think that this is our opportunity to

57:11

increase the the salary for the elected

57:13

officials and so I will be supporting

57:14

it.

57:16

>> Great. Thank you. I just wanted there

57:18

any other potential amendments

57:21

on the floor? Okay. Seeing and hearing

57:24

none, I'd like to move to uh final

57:27

passage for bill 15 of 2025.

57:30

>> You you have to get through that whole

57:31

section of the thing. You I think you

57:33

know I think you know the intentions

57:34

now, but you have to get through

57:35

amendments first. So

57:38

>> Well, then I'll make my final comments

57:40

on bill 15 of 2025.

57:43

I have thought long and hard about bill

57:46

15 of 2025.

57:49

If I'm being honest, I am disappointed

57:51

that Mayor Williams was not present to

57:53

discuss the bill during the work session

57:56

on Tuesday, December 9th, 2025.

57:59

As I've shared previously, Harrisburg

58:02

City Council did not request this

58:04

legislation. The legislation was

58:06

requested by Mayor Williams. I

58:09

understand the neverending role of a

58:12

member of Harrisburg City Council.

58:14

However, we knew what we've signed up

58:17

for when we decided to run for public

58:19

office. I feel very strongly that

58:23

instead of a raise, the mayor, her

58:25

administration, and Harrisburg City

58:28

Council should focus their energy on the

58:30

number of issues present within our

58:33

city. There are many blighted properties

58:35

throughout the city of Harrisburg. dark

58:37

streets with no lights, a dying

58:40

downtown,

58:41

no real plan to spur economic

58:44

development, and a parking system that

58:46

will drive anyone away. These are just

58:50

some of the issues that should be

58:52

discussed and acted upon instead of a

58:54

raise. I would like to remind everyone

58:57

that the city treasurer's office

58:58

recently resumed regular business hours.

59:02

Finally, I can count the number of times

59:05

Mayor Williams called this council

59:08

incompetent

59:10

under my leadership and she wants a

59:13

raise. The answer is no.

59:17

Okay. So,

59:24

I move to resume discussion on bill 12

59:29

of 2025.

59:31

Mr. Trusdale, could you please read it

59:33

into the record again?

59:36

[clears throat]

59:37

>> Bill 12, 2025, an ordinance establishing

59:40

the budget for the municipal government

59:42

of the city of Harrisburg for the year

59:44

2026.

59:50

>> Okay, I will defer to Vice President

59:54

Green to lead discussion surrounding

59:56

amendments.

59:58

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, so I will

1:00:01

read any amendments that were sent in

1:00:03

beforehand by council members. I will

1:00:05

move each of these amendments. Each of

1:00:07

these amendments then will need a second

1:00:09

before they can be voted on. Uh, to make

1:00:11

it clear, all these amendments are not

1:00:13

from me, but I will move every

1:00:14

amendment.

1:00:17

Amendment number one to increase the

1:00:19

city clerk's 2026 salary to match the

1:00:23

excuse me. I make a motion to amend the

1:00:25

2026 budget for the city council by

1:00:28

increasing the proposed budget and

1:00:30

salaries and wages for the position of

1:00:33

city clerk to $80,765.

1:00:38

Is there a second?

1:00:40

>> Second.

1:00:42

>> It's been moved and second. Does anyone

1:00:45

have any comments that they would like

1:00:46

to make regarding this?

1:00:48

>> I do. Um, I would like to note that I

1:00:51

did not craft this amendment. Um, if

1:00:55

we're looking at salary for the city

1:00:57

clerk and we want something comparable

1:01:00

to that of our former retired city

1:01:03

clerk, Mr. Parker, Mr. Parker was

1:01:06

bilingual, and I think that has to be

1:01:10

taken into consideration here. He was

1:01:12

able to uh translate our documents, our

1:01:15

meeting agendas um and our um

1:01:18

infographics for social media to ensure

1:01:21

that we are able

1:01:24

to

1:01:26

connect with residents of our city and

1:01:30

without

1:01:31

that translation I think there is a a

1:01:34

small disconnect there. So, that is why

1:01:37

I made the decision um to fund the the

1:01:42

city clerk's salary at an even $70,000.

1:01:47

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um I guess

1:01:50

when I was looking at the the budget in

1:01:52

general, um I felt like if the assistant

1:01:56

clerk had been moved into the clerk's

1:01:57

position, uh that that you must have

1:02:00

felt like he was qualified for the

1:02:01

position. And so that um the salary

1:02:04

should then match the previous position.

1:02:06

Um I will say that I wish it would have

1:02:10

been more communication that the the

1:02:12

clerk the assistant clerk was moved into

1:02:14

the clerk's position. Uh I I found that

1:02:16

out through a conversation with the new

1:02:18

clerk himself where I took the time to

1:02:20

congratulate him uh and his his new role

1:02:23

as well as uh Mr. Humphrey moving into

1:02:25

his new role. I mean, I just think as as

1:02:28

council members that that would have

1:02:29

been nice to have heard uh either from

1:02:31

you or from the clerk just like via

1:02:33

email or something because

1:02:34

>> Oh, I'm sorry. I thought it was clear

1:02:36

that that was going to be the transition

1:02:39

following Mr. Parker's retirement, but

1:02:41

that's fine. Okay. I apologize, but I I

1:02:44

don't I think that it is

1:02:50

I think the the fact that Mr. Parker was

1:02:53

able to translate our documents and was

1:02:56

a former Spanish teacher. He's

1:02:58

bilingual. I think that is what I

1:03:01

accounted for and I think it that it

1:03:03

should be accounted for in the current

1:03:05

city clerk salary.

1:03:08

>> Thank you. I do understand that. Um and

1:03:10

this isn't like a back and forth. I was

1:03:12

just finishing up what I was saying. Um,

1:03:14

but just to say that uh if that if we

1:03:16

were looking for someone bilingual, I

1:03:17

think that maybe we should look for a

1:03:19

different candidate that, no offense,

1:03:21

but someone that fit the bill, if that's

1:03:22

the entire bill we were looking for. Um,

1:03:26

and so that that was just kind of my

1:03:27

thought process when I was thinking

1:03:28

about the salaries, just kind of going

1:03:30

if someone moved into the new position,

1:03:32

um, I thought that the the salary would

1:03:34

stay the same. So, I'll open it up to

1:03:35

anyone else. Um, any other comments?

1:03:37

>> Yeah, for me, um, you know, since I've

1:03:40

been here, I I'll just say this. I

1:03:42

didn't take in consideration what

1:03:43

President Hill said about uh bilingual.

1:03:46

Um but Mr. Parker did a wonderful job

1:03:49

and I just thought by moving into that

1:03:51

space, it would naturally go into that

1:03:53

and I can understand uh council

1:03:55

president's concerns. But uh you know

1:03:57

for for me as far as I've been here um

1:04:00

Mr. Trudale has done a wonderful job um

1:04:02

for us as a body not just myself but

1:04:05

just for us as a body and

1:04:07

>> [snorts]

1:04:07

>> um I just want to give you my support

1:04:09

man. So you know that's where I am.

1:04:11

Oh, I have something else. Um,

1:04:15

>> no, no, it's fine.

1:04:18

We are still looking for someone uh who

1:04:21

is bilingual

1:04:23

um to fill that gap. I would also like

1:04:26

to note Mr. Parker is a city resident. I

1:04:29

think that needs to be noted too.

1:04:34

I just had I just wanted to say I

1:04:36

supported the raise due to the fact I

1:04:39

did not take in account of the bilingual

1:04:41

piece and I agree we do need that here

1:04:43

down at at city council for our

1:04:45

documents um so we can stay connected

1:04:47

with um our residents who do not have

1:04:50

English as a first language. Um but I do

1:04:53

take in consideration the parts that our

1:04:57

current uh city clerk plays in the roles

1:05:00

of technology um information and um

1:05:03

making sure we're up to date in those

1:05:05

pieces. I think he brings a wealth of

1:05:06

knowledge in those areas um and is

1:05:10

always um very diligent in our making

1:05:14

our flyers communications. I think a lot

1:05:16

of things that I'm unable to do he can

1:05:19

do. So I was taking that into

1:05:21

consideration. So, I just was putting my

1:05:24

um two cents in there for that part. And

1:05:25

>> I'll just I'll just kind of say I was

1:05:28

looking at it from the perspective of

1:05:31

comparable to the colleagues. Um also,

1:05:34

there wasn't a line item for translation

1:05:36

in the budget. So, I didn't realize that

1:05:38

city council was deducting

1:05:41

that like translation from a salary. Um

1:05:46

but also um the

1:05:50

you know in the time that Mr. Trusel has

1:05:52

been a cler uh has moved up to this

1:05:55

role, he has never failed to send the

1:05:56

bill up to the mayor's office on time

1:05:58

and that is incredibly incredibly

1:06:00

important. Um more so than translation.

1:06:03

Translation is something we could

1:06:04

contract out. It's something we could um

1:06:06

you know we have people in the comm's

1:06:08

department who can help with

1:06:09

translation. Uh so you know uh I think

1:06:14

as as far as a legislative body we need

1:06:16

people to send things up on time. Um

1:06:21

and that's like my reasoning.

1:06:24

>> Thank you. Uh President Hill and then

1:06:27

Councilwoman Davis.

1:06:28

>> Thank you. I just wanted to clarify that

1:06:31

we are not uh able to utilize anyone in

1:06:36

the communications department to

1:06:38

translate anything for city council. So,

1:06:40

I just wanted to note that per the

1:06:42

mayor's direction.

1:06:45

>> Councilwoman Davis.

1:06:46

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Um yes,

1:06:49

I was just looking at this from the

1:06:51

perspective of a um a gradual growth

1:06:56

process. If the $78,413

1:07:01

plus a 3% annual raise was Mr. Parker's

1:07:06

uh salary and Mr. Trudale is just

1:07:10

getting promoted. I think that um

1:07:13

somewhere in the middle that he should

1:07:16

be because Mr. Parker was here for many

1:07:18

years and he had to work up to this. So

1:07:21

just from that perspective, but

1:07:23

otherwise Mr. Trudale has been a great

1:07:26

city clerk and I can't take anything

1:07:28

away from him for that. So,

1:07:34

>> any other comments or discussion?

1:07:38

Seeing none, Mr. Trudale, if you

1:07:41

wouldn't mind uh calling the vote.

1:07:44

>> Miss Daniels,

1:07:46

>> yes.

1:07:47

>> Miss Green.

1:07:49

>> Miss Davis.

1:07:50

>> Oh, this this vote sheet's wrong. Miss

1:07:52

Davis,

1:07:54

>> no.

1:07:56

>> Miss Green,

1:07:57

>> yes.

1:07:58

>> Mr. Jones,

1:08:00

>> yay.

1:08:01

>> Miss Rolls,

1:08:02

>> yes.

1:08:03

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

1:08:04

>> yes.

1:08:05

>> Miss Hill,

1:08:06

>> no.

1:08:08

>> Amendment one passes by vote of 5 to2.

1:08:12

>> Thank you. Amendment number two. I make

1:08:16

a motion to amend the 2026 proposed

1:08:18

budget for the Department of Building

1:08:19

and Housing by eliminating the gender

1:08:22

general fund funding for the proposed

1:08:24

2026 budget under salaries and wages for

1:08:27

the position of interimm director for

1:08:29

building and housing and development.

1:08:31

>> So move.

1:08:33

>> That was the second. Thank you.

1:08:36

>> Uh

1:08:38

does anyone have any discussion?

1:08:39

>> Yes, I do. I offer this amendment.

1:08:44

I would like to note the number of times

1:08:47

that we invited the interim director

1:08:51

of building and housing, Miss Gloria

1:08:53

Martin Roberts, to attend council

1:08:55

meetings. So, please bear with me.

1:08:58

December 9th, 2025,

1:09:01

uh the work session that was held, she

1:09:04

was present to discuss bill 14 of 2025,

1:09:08

the LER extension.

1:09:12

December 8th, 2025, that was the budget

1:09:15

hearing. Uh she attended

1:09:18

September 10th, 2025, the policy work

1:09:22

session related to the non-ARPA funding.

1:09:25

Uh she did attend

1:09:28

July 29th, 2025, that was the special

1:09:32

legislative session um to discuss the

1:09:35

2025 annual action plan. Um she

1:09:39

confirmed her attendance

1:09:42

July 1st, 2025 annual action plan

1:09:45

invite. Interim director Martin Roberts

1:09:48

noted inability to attend due to prior

1:09:51

engagement citing a vacation that was

1:09:54

scheduled from June 1st through July

1:09:56

7th.

1:09:58

I think it should have read July 1st

1:10:01

through July 7th.

1:10:04

January 7th, 2025

1:10:08

work session invitation. Um, this was

1:10:11

related to the ARPA funding.

1:10:15

Mr. Sowski responded saying that interim

1:10:18

director Martin Roberts will not be

1:10:20

attending. He cited that she provided a

1:10:22

detailed written report for quarter 3 of

1:10:26

2024.

1:10:28

And Mr. Sokowski offered to respond to

1:10:30

any questions in writing if sent over

1:10:33

and needing more specific responses.

1:10:36

December 12th, 2024. That was a budget

1:10:40

hearing. She confirmed her attendance.

1:10:42

December 9th, 2024, that was a work

1:10:46

session. Bill 9 of 2024, the LERA

1:10:49

extension. She confirmed her attendance.

1:10:53

October 1st, 2024,

1:10:56

a work session invitation was extended

1:10:59

regarding the status updates on ARPA

1:11:01

programs.

1:11:03

Um,

1:11:05

Miss Willingham

1:11:07

emailed noting that Miss Gloria Martin

1:11:09

Roberts was not well at that time and

1:11:11

she would not be in attendance. Um, she

1:11:14

did confirm her attendance prior on

1:11:16

September 27th.

1:11:19

September 17th, 2024, work session

1:11:23

regarding ARPA fund updates. She cited

1:11:27

prior arrangements.

1:11:29

September 10th, 2024, a legislative

1:11:32

session related to resolution 47 of

1:11:36

2024,

1:11:37

she confirmed her attendance. And then

1:11:40

September 3rd, 2024, work session

1:11:44

relating to resolution, the same

1:11:46

resolution 47 of 2024, she cited having

1:11:51

a previous commitment and she couldn't

1:11:53

attend. July 30th, 2024 was a special

1:11:57

legislative session. uh discussing the

1:11:59

annual action plan. She confirmed her

1:12:01

attendance. July 2nd of 2024 was a work

1:12:05

session. She was invited to discuss

1:12:08

resolution 41 of 2025 which or 24 which

1:12:13

was the 2024 annual action plan. She

1:12:16

confirmed her attendance. And then July

1:12:20

4th or excuse me, June 4th, 2024, a work

1:12:24

session related to the Harrisburg

1:12:26

Housing Authority Board of Directors

1:12:28

consideration. She confirmed her

1:12:30

attendance. Then um I

1:12:34

offered this amendment because

1:12:38

there's still nothing happening

1:12:41

um with the general fund portion of her

1:12:44

salary related to uh community and

1:12:48

economic development. So I say all this

1:12:50

to say I shared her attendance and we've

1:12:53

extended invitations time and time again

1:12:55

over the past two years now. and

1:13:00

sometimes she comes, sometimes she

1:13:01

doesn't. And I just think it's a it's a

1:13:03

disservice to our residents. Um, this

1:13:06

information that's shared is critical. I

1:13:09

still haven't received a response for

1:13:11

the LERA information that I asked for

1:13:13

every single year. And the home funding,

1:13:17

um, it's just what are did we meet our

1:13:19

benchmarks? Simple question. Still

1:13:21

haven't received a response because Mr.

1:13:24

Trudale didn't uh share a date that it

1:13:27

was needed. I think it's just

1:13:29

unfortunate. I really wish that the

1:13:32

position was opened up so that other um

1:13:36

talented and qualified residents could

1:13:40

apply. So that's why I offered this

1:13:42

amendment. Thank you.

1:13:44

>> Thank you. Anyone else?

1:13:46

>> I did have something to say. Um, I

1:13:49

wanted to speak because I do um agree

1:13:52

with this amendment, but I wanted to say

1:13:54

first it's not a personal reason. I

1:13:57

think um at our last meeting that was

1:14:00

brought up uh that there are personal

1:14:03

tensions um between council and um uh

1:14:07

Miss Gloria Martin Roberts. And I want

1:14:09

to say my decision on this has nothing

1:14:11

is nothing personal. It's nothing

1:14:13

personal against her. For me, it's the

1:14:15

process and what's right here in our

1:14:17

government. There's a process for

1:14:19

someone to become a director. They do

1:14:21

start as entrram acting um for a certain

1:14:25

amount of days and then they come down

1:14:27

for a vote. I think it's been over 300

1:14:29

and some days, but I'm probably wrong. I

1:14:31

think it's been even more than that.

1:14:33

Yeah, that it's been more than a year

1:14:35

that she's been in this position and we

1:14:37

have no communication if if she will be

1:14:39

coming down for a vote. Is she going to

1:14:41

be the director? And I think that um we

1:14:45

need to follow the processes. They they

1:14:46

are what keep us accountable. Um so I

1:14:49

think that it's unfair for her to be in

1:14:52

this position when there have not been

1:14:54

correct processes followed. So I agree

1:14:57

that the portion of the money that comes

1:14:58

from our budget should be taken from her

1:15:01

and I do understand that she still gets

1:15:03

federal um portions of her money, but I

1:15:06

do think we we need to follow the

1:15:07

correct processes when we have

1:15:09

directors. So, I do support this

1:15:11

amendment for those reasons. Nothing

1:15:14

personal.

1:15:15

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones.

1:15:17

>> Yes. Uh thank you, Council uh Vice

1:15:20

President Green and Councilwoman Ross

1:15:23

for your sentiments. Um I too made this

1:15:26

amendment and my reason being again is

1:15:29

the process isn't fair. And there was a

1:15:32

statement made that this is personal. It

1:15:34

is personal for me. This is personal

1:15:36

that our residents get what they

1:15:38

deserve. You know, when you're in a

1:15:40

position of of leadership, you have to

1:15:43

be held accountable. What does

1:15:44

accountability look like? You know, we

1:15:46

have accountability. When we call out

1:15:48

these things, we get thrashed and

1:15:50

whether it's the media or social media,

1:15:52

people will come after you. But I I just

1:15:55

want to stand on the side of

1:15:56

righteousness. Um again, the process is

1:15:59

flawed. And for me, I think it's a it's

1:16:03

a disrespect to council when um people

1:16:07

have sat in this chair before. You know,

1:16:09

you you know what this process is.

1:16:11

You're going to have to make tough

1:16:12

decisions. There's going to be nos,

1:16:14

there's going to be yays, there's going

1:16:16

to be nays, and they're not always going

1:16:17

to fall on the right side of what people

1:16:20

feel they should. But I think in this

1:16:22

instance, for us to be completely

1:16:24

ignored in my opinion, um this is why I

1:16:26

also uh made this amendment. So those

1:16:29

those are my sentiments.

1:16:32

>> Councilman Rodriguez.

1:16:33

>> Thank you, Madame Vice President. Um

1:16:35

Madame President, I just wanted to get

1:16:37

your idea of why specifically u moving

1:16:40

them to the municipal host fee. Just for

1:16:43

my just

1:16:44

>> it's not we can't

1:16:46

>> Oh,

1:16:46

>> so it's just right now it's just the

1:16:48

funding uh the portion of the funding in

1:16:52

the general fun.

1:16:53

>> Okay. Thank you. Thank you.

1:16:56

Any other comments or questions

1:16:58

regarding amendment two?

1:17:01

Seeing none, Mr. Trudeau, could you call

1:17:03

the vote?

1:17:06

>> Miss Daniels.

1:17:10

Miss Daniels.

1:17:11

>> Yes.

1:17:12

>> Yes.

1:17:13

>> Miss Davis.

1:17:17

>> Yeah, she knows.

1:17:18

>> Yes, she knows.

1:17:19

>> She's here. She was just unmuting her

1:17:20

mic.

1:17:22

>> Is it my turn?

1:17:23

>> Miss Davis? No,

1:17:26

>> Miss Green.

1:17:27

>> No,

1:17:29

>> Mr. Jones.

1:17:30

>> Yay.

1:17:31

>> Miss Rolls.

1:17:33

>> Yes,

1:17:34

>> Mr. Rodriguez.

1:17:36

>> Uh, no.

1:17:37

>> Miss Hill.

1:17:39

>> Yes.

1:17:40

>> Amendment two passes by vote of four to

1:17:42

three.

1:17:45

>> Thank you very much. Amendment number

1:17:47

three.

1:17:49

>> Right here.

1:17:50

I make a motion to the amend to to amend

1:17:53

the 2026 proposed budget for the

1:17:55

business administrator's office by

1:17:57

eliminating the funding for the proposed

1:17:59

2026 budget under the salaries and wages

1:18:02

for the position of business

1:18:03

administrator.

1:18:05

>> You have a second.

1:18:07

>> Thank you. Is there any discussion?

1:18:10

>> Yeah, I guess I'll start here too. Um um

1:18:13

I I also,

1:18:15

you know, helped make this amendment um

1:18:18

again for the purpose of our process. Um

1:18:22

the business administrator is definitely

1:18:24

a vital role in city government.

1:18:26

However, I've seen other governments or

1:18:28

municipalities work without it. And just

1:18:31

to the mere fact that um there was a

1:18:33

vote um I do give Mr. Sowski. Um, kudos

1:18:37

for at least coming in front of us and

1:18:39

having that respect to to be voted yay

1:18:41

or nay. And um, and for that, you know,

1:18:44

I just have to have respect in that

1:18:46

regard. But again, um, there was a vote

1:18:48

and it wasn't being followed. And so I

1:18:52

just think this is a time again, I know

1:18:53

people, we're in a time where everyone

1:18:55

wants to be uh, politically correct. U,

1:18:58

we want to pick a side of who we're with

1:18:59

or who we're not with. you know, I'm

1:19:01

with the people of the city of

1:19:02

Harrisburg, and I think that um until we

1:19:05

have that respect for our citizens, our

1:19:07

residents here, um I'm just going to be

1:19:10

a continual voice that speaks in a

1:19:12

regard that those phone calls that I get

1:19:14

from my residents, uh the emails that I

1:19:17

get from the residents that um like what

1:19:20

is going on with the city of Harrisburg?

1:19:22

What's happening? What's going on? And

1:19:23

to the best of my ability, I tried to

1:19:25

speak to it um and and be courageable

1:19:28

about it and not worry about the

1:19:30

repercussions or who's going to not like

1:19:32

or you know I was put here for a reason

1:19:35

and I'm going to hold to that in that

1:19:38

regard of keep to keep the people's

1:19:40

voices heard and respected. So um that's

1:19:44

why I made my adjustments for this

1:19:45

amendment.

1:19:47

>> Thank you. Any other comments regarding

1:19:49

this?

1:19:52

Seeing none, Mr. Trudo, could you call

1:19:55

the vote?

1:19:57

>> Miss Daniels,

1:19:58

>> yes.

1:20:00

>> Miss Davis,

1:20:02

>> no.

1:20:03

>> Miss Green,

1:20:04

>> no.

1:20:05

>> Mr. Jones,

1:20:07

>> yay.

1:20:08

>> Miss Rolls,

1:20:12

>> yes.

1:20:14

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

1:20:15

>> no.

1:20:17

>> Miss Hill,

1:20:18

>> yes.

1:20:20

Amendment three passes by vote of 4 to

1:20:22

three.

1:20:29

Amendment number four. I make a motion

1:20:32

to amend the 2026 proposed budget for

1:20:35

the department of building and housing

1:20:37

by eliminating the funding for the

1:20:39

proposed 2026 budget under salaries and

1:20:41

wages for the position of project

1:20:44

director for business development and

1:20:45

learn administrator.

1:20:50

Second.

1:20:52

>> It's been moved and second. Is there

1:20:54

anyone interested in discussion?

1:20:58

>> Councilman Jones.

1:21:00

>> Uh yeah. I just think um again, you

1:21:03

know, we we've we've summoned not

1:21:05

summoned, I hate to use that word. Um I

1:21:08

didn't make this amendment, but I'm

1:21:09

going to support it. Um because I think

1:21:12

that, you know, um as I go back in time

1:21:14

and I just keep looking at these um

1:21:16

discussions that we're having, the same

1:21:19

conversations are being held. And I hate

1:21:22

for someone to pee on me and tell me

1:21:24

it's raining. Not saying that this is

1:21:26

the case here, but I just think that um

1:21:28

in this space, we're not really getting

1:21:31

what I think we could with uh out of

1:21:34

this department. And I'm not knowing if

1:21:35

this person's hands being tied behind

1:21:37

her back because of other leadership,

1:21:39

but I just don't think um at this time

1:21:42

we can continue down this path with with

1:21:44

with no results.

1:21:47

>> Thank you, President Hill.

1:21:49

>> Thank you. Um I'll just note that we've

1:21:52

we've been having the same conversation

1:21:56

for four years now. Um, and personally,

1:22:00

I've been looking and waiting for a

1:22:02

clear economic development plan to move

1:22:05

this city forward. So, I support the

1:22:08

amendment.

1:22:10

>> Thank you very much, Councilwoman Ross.

1:22:12

>> Um, I just wanted to add that I just

1:22:17

this position is so important. Our our

1:22:20

downtown, our economic development is

1:22:23

not where it needs to be. And we've been

1:22:24

asking for a plan for

1:22:28

since I've been on council and probably

1:22:30

before that and there just hasn't been

1:22:32

one and I'm just very displeased with

1:22:34

that and so are the residents of

1:22:36

Harrisburg. So that's why I do support

1:22:38

this amendment.

1:22:41

>> Councilman Jones.

1:22:42

>> Yeah. Just and just to be clear on um

1:22:45

for for these type of uh amendments,

1:22:47

this doesn't mean we don't want these

1:22:49

individuals in the city of Harrisburg. I

1:22:51

just think they could do better in a

1:22:53

different department. This one is just

1:22:55

not working for me.

1:22:58

Um, I'll just make my my little comments

1:23:00

on this one. Uh, I will agree that the

1:23:03

position has not been

1:23:07

yielding the results that the residents

1:23:08

of Harrisburg deserve. Um, but I don't

1:23:11

think it's the position. I think I don't

1:23:13

know if it's what's being asked of the

1:23:15

position. I don't know if the person is

1:23:17

being stretched into too many different

1:23:19

ways. Uh, I think this is a very

1:23:21

important position. Um, we talk about

1:23:23

development. We talk about wanting more

1:23:26

economic development and as of right now

1:23:29

um according to the administration this

1:23:31

is the only road doing that job. Um my

1:23:34

question is what other job is being done

1:23:36

because we're not seeing that job being

1:23:39

done. So I kind of am on the fence about

1:23:42

this. Um I think the role is very much

1:23:44

needed. I think it needs to be a better

1:23:47

job and perhaps that means a different

1:23:49

person for the job. So that's my

1:23:51

comments. Uh President Hill.

1:23:52

>> Thank you. I just like to note that

1:23:54

we've had successful uh business

1:23:57

development and learner administrators

1:24:00

even during the pandemic. The former

1:24:04

uh business development learner

1:24:06

administrator um held online uh training

1:24:11

certificate programs with Google hosted

1:24:14

um regular um co-working meetings for

1:24:18

startups. So I think I don't know if

1:24:21

it's the person I don't know what what

1:24:24

the disconnect is, but we've seen this

1:24:26

role perform successfully. So I don't

1:24:29

maybe there's not a need to reinvent the

1:24:32

wheel, but it's been done before.

1:24:36

>> Councilwoman Davis.

1:24:38

>> Yes. Thank you, Vice President Hill.

1:24:41

Um I just wanted to mention that um

1:24:47

if the disconnect is with the person

1:24:50

again as my uh colleague Mr. Jones,

1:24:53

Councilman Jones mentioned it could go

1:24:55

to another position and it's okay that

1:25:00

you know someone may not be suitable for

1:25:03

a specific job. You know they may be

1:25:05

suitable for another position.

1:25:09

Thank you.

1:25:11

Thank you. Um, just my final comment.

1:25:13

I've made my decision. Um, [laughter]

1:25:18

um, I will say that I'm going to vote

1:25:21

not to support this because I think the

1:25:23

role is needed. Uh, but I do think that

1:25:25

we need to find someone more suitable

1:25:27

for the position. But I think the role

1:25:29

is needed. As noted by President Hill,

1:25:32

this role has performed successfully in

1:25:34

the past. So I can't say defunding the

1:25:36

role gets us the results we want because

1:25:38

that defunds the entire position.

1:25:41

>> So madam vice president would it be

1:25:43

appropriate to amend the amendment

1:25:45

keeping the allocations in under the

1:25:47

contingency of maybe an open

1:25:51

>> we do not we do not hire or fire. That

1:25:53

is the role of the administration. Um we

1:25:55

can have discussions with the

1:25:56

administration but we do not make that

1:25:58

call. So um we control the power of the

1:26:01

purse and so we fund we defund we um we

1:26:04

can do that but we cannot we cannot

1:26:06

choose who stays in in any any role.

1:26:08

>> Well I didn't mean choose at no regard

1:26:10

but maybe work in collaboration to

1:26:12

ensure we're going back into a hiring

1:26:14

phase but um I totally understand. It's

1:26:17

just I hear the general common synopsis

1:26:20

that the role is you know intricate for

1:26:23

the city but may just not be the

1:26:25

individual currently. So, I'd hate to

1:26:27

wipe it away and not be able to fill it,

1:26:29

but I do understand council's take on

1:26:32

that. Thank you.

1:26:34

>> And I would hope that we could have a

1:26:35

discussion with the administration as

1:26:36

far as um

1:26:40

finding a better suited person for that

1:26:42

role and maybe finding a better position

1:26:44

for the other person, but I cannot

1:26:45

guarantee that. Uh it looks like leak

1:26:48

has something.

1:26:49

>> I just want to make sure everyone

1:26:50

understands what you're doing. You're

1:26:52

reorganizing the government. You're so

1:26:54

there will be no director of economic

1:26:56

development there will be no business

1:26:57

administrator portions of the code that

1:26:59

dictate that and if you do this there'll

1:27:01

be no so it's not that there will be a

1:27:02

position it's not that there'll be a

1:27:04

position to fill when you do do it this

1:27:06

way so I'm just make want to make clear

1:27:08

that's that's what it will be so um then

1:27:12

there will I'm not quite sure where it

1:27:14

goes from then because they have to

1:27:15

start pulling apart the code for example

1:27:17

with the business administrator what do

1:27:19

you do because they have statutory

1:27:21

duties

1:27:22

>> follow the process

1:27:23

>> may I ask a question So you mentioned, I

1:27:26

guess this was last week, that the

1:27:29

previous Oh, that the previous

1:27:32

administration operated how long without

1:27:34

a business director?

1:27:36

>> They did, but they had it budgeted. So

1:27:38

I'm saying you you you're by eliminating

1:27:40

the position by defunding it. You know,

1:27:42

you you are you are basically

1:27:44

eliminating the position, it's going to

1:27:46

be a zero position in the budget. So

1:27:49

they searched for for a business

1:27:51

administrator. Um, but frankly, I don't

1:27:54

know why anyone's going to apply to my

1:27:55

office or anyone's going to apply to any

1:27:56

other office.

1:27:58

>> So,

1:27:58

>> the city of Harrisburg when the council

1:28:01

defunds positions of existing employees.

1:28:03

>> So, I mean, that is one of the realities

1:28:05

of of what decisions you are making.

1:28:08

>> I think this is short of taking

1:28:09

ourselves to court because there's

1:28:12

there's law and I asked you about this

1:28:14

several time that's on the books. The

1:28:16

mayor has the the right to appoint long

1:28:19

as council approves. He was voted down

1:28:22

yet he's still here.

1:28:24

>> I believe I believe it's the longest

1:28:26

legal opinion I've ever written was

1:28:27

related to this issue four years ago.

1:28:29

>> So you you're saying what we what what

1:28:31

we should do and I asked you but I think

1:28:33

this is this would this would make the

1:28:35

process something something has to

1:28:38

happen because um we didn't approve this

1:28:40

gentleman.

1:28:41

>> I understand

1:28:42

>> we have we something has to happen. If I

1:28:44

give if I I didn't win um in the

1:28:46

election do I still take the seat? I sir

1:28:50

I got I'm just I'm just trying to make

1:28:52

clear what you know what what the

1:28:53

rearrangement does and what happens.

1:28:56

>> So how do we do this without removing

1:29:00

the position

1:29:02

>> defunding the position?

1:29:04

>> I mean isn't the BA slightly different

1:29:06

because it is a statutory position.

1:29:09

I think maybe the other ones are are

1:29:12

being totally removed, but the BA will

1:29:14

always exist because it's part of our

1:29:16

>> but they cannot run a search for dis for

1:29:19

a position that has no funds, right? I

1:29:21

mean, this is this is the issue. So,

1:29:23

you're going to have to come back and

1:29:24

the mayor's going to have to come back

1:29:26

and you're guys going to have to figure

1:29:27

something out together. I mean, that's

1:29:28

simply the reality of it.

1:29:30

>> But we've been asking

1:29:31

>> we have and I think the reality too is

1:29:33

certain jobs aren't being done. Our city

1:29:36

is in a certain disarray because certain

1:29:39

people have hold certain roles and

1:29:41

certain jobs that are so important

1:29:43

they're not being done. And after time

1:29:45

and time of asking you get nothing.

1:29:49

And what in in reality if you don't do

1:29:51

your job

1:29:54

you you get let go. I I hear you. There

1:29:57

there is where I tell you the difference

1:29:58

between executive function legislative

1:30:00

function. You have the power of the

1:30:01

purse. That is absolutely right. But I

1:30:03

want to be real clear there. There

1:30:04

wouldn't be a search to be done for a

1:30:07

position that has no funds in it. The

1:30:09

other side is I don't know why anyone

1:30:11

would apply to work for the city of

1:30:12

Harrisburg if your position is defunded.

1:30:17

>> Why would you apply for any job here?

1:30:19

>> Any job.

1:30:21

>> Your job.

1:30:21

>> What do you re what do you gave us? You

1:30:24

really gave us no. Now we have a great

1:30:26

legal opinion because we're in this

1:30:27

situation. When we ask about this

1:30:29

illegal opinion of what could we do?

1:30:32

This is short of us taking ourselves to

1:30:34

court, which will really look crazy

1:30:37

because we made a decision here at

1:30:40

council and it was ignored.

1:30:43

>> I believe a legal opinion was provided

1:30:46

uh that stated that they are no longer

1:30:49

and they are no longer in an acting

1:30:51

position but now in an interim position

1:30:54

which isn't a position that is legally

1:30:56

defined in the code. And so, uh, it's

1:30:59

been used in the past

1:31:00

>> for for years. And and unfortunately,

1:31:02

it's where it is. It just is where it

1:31:04

is. I I I'm just telling you where, at

1:31:07

least from my my seat, what it what it

1:31:09

looks like. It's hard enough to attract

1:31:11

people as it is. I don't think this

1:31:13

makes it easier. Um, and I go to court

1:31:16

all the time, so I'm not that unus to

1:31:18

it. The, uh, other things is you can

1:31:20

amend the code otherwise. You can add

1:31:22

other you can add other carrots and

1:31:24

sticks, but that's, you know, that you

1:31:25

can take a legislative action to do

1:31:26

that. that when you ask what else you

1:31:28

do.

1:31:28

>> Yeah, that's what I was getting back to.

1:31:30

So,

1:31:30

>> carrots and sticks, that's that's you

1:31:32

know, you have provisions already that

1:31:34

restrict the what the controller can do.

1:31:36

So,

1:31:42

>> Councilwoman Davis,

1:31:44

>> thank you, Vice President Green. I just

1:31:46

don't see how defunding the position is

1:31:50

going to help us. Um, I think that by

1:31:53

inter having the interim directors

1:31:55

there, it gives the administration the

1:31:58

opportunity to look for

1:32:01

uh more qualified.

1:32:03

>> These positions were never opened up.

1:32:05

>> Yes,

1:32:05

>> they were never opened up when they had

1:32:07

ample time to do

1:32:08

>> positions were not opened again. The

1:32:11

>> what is this? The interim building and

1:32:14

housing director that was never open.

1:32:17

So, we were never able to see if there

1:32:20

were other residents, members of the

1:32:22

public that were even interested in the

1:32:24

role. This this amendment right now

1:32:26

though, I understand the need, but

1:32:30

again, we've seen this role done

1:32:32

successfully and this just is not a

1:32:35

success for me.

1:32:39

And just piggybacking off of the general

1:32:41

conversation, not so much this role, um,

1:32:44

but kind of more into the like interm

1:32:46

roles, um, I suppose the the other

1:32:49

option for the administration would be

1:32:50

to fire and hire someone every 120 days.

1:32:54

So essentially, um, they have to come

1:32:57

before us every 120 days, I believe

1:32:59

statute says. Uh and so the mayor has

1:33:02

the right to or the ability, the duty,

1:33:05

um and the privilege to appoint someone

1:33:08

to fill the role for 120 days. They can

1:33:11

then reappoint them again without them

1:33:14

having to come back come to council

1:33:16

because they have to come once they hit

1:33:17

that 120day mark. Am I correct?

1:33:21

>> Yeah. The the only case law out there

1:33:22

was a governor reappointing someone the

1:33:24

Senate had rejected and then

1:33:26

reappointing them again. and the court

1:33:28

said that was the governor's right to do

1:33:30

and it was the legislator's right to

1:33:32

reject them and that's the only guidance

1:33:34

we have from the courts on this question

1:33:36

in Pennsylvania.

1:33:37

>> Okay. And has that been done as far as

1:33:39

these uh positions?

1:33:41

>> They that's when they converted to the

1:33:43

interim was basically to so to to not

1:33:45

keep going through that process. That's

1:33:47

that's how this came about.

1:33:50

>> Well, when exactly did they convert to

1:33:52

the interim? I think that happened under

1:33:55

well I think it was done in both the

1:33:57

patent flu administration. It was done I

1:34:00

believe in the Reed administration and I

1:34:02

believe it was done in the uh Thompson

1:34:04

administration. I believe Mayor Reid

1:34:07

took one director and and made them the

1:34:09

deputy without a director over them

1:34:11

because he could not come to an

1:34:12

agreement with city council. I mean

1:34:14

there's no this is this is really

1:34:15

government at its most fundamental with

1:34:17

the two branches of government is trying

1:34:19

to find a way to govern and operate and

1:34:21

trying to find a way to get the branches

1:34:23

to agree. Um you know the uh uh and my

1:34:28

point is really just simply about

1:34:31

I have no concern that people vote the

1:34:34

way they vote. I just want to make sure

1:34:36

it's understood that you can't search

1:34:38

for a position that has no funds. Right.

1:34:41

the the mayor doesn't have the

1:34:42

>> we understand that. But again,

1:34:46

I I can't speak for my colleagues. I'm

1:34:48

only speaking for me. And it's it's very

1:34:50

frustrating when we get to a point like

1:34:52

this now, everybody's paying attention

1:34:54

to what we have to say.

1:34:56

>> And that's wrong. And I find it

1:34:59

disrespectful that when we we we we

1:35:02

again, if we pass anything here tonight,

1:35:05

it has to be followed.

1:35:08

If not, what are we here for? What are

1:35:11

we doing? The disrespect that comes out

1:35:14

of that position

1:35:17

for for this body

1:35:20

is is disrespectful and it's

1:35:21

disrespectful for our people. We knew it

1:35:24

when we came in. I I I said it

1:35:27

personally to Mr. Sowski that I would

1:35:29

not be supporting him just based off the

1:35:32

resume and then the attitude didn't

1:35:35

help. No one comes and talks to us until

1:35:38

this point now until it's time to we're

1:35:41

we're making a decision and I think that

1:35:43

this is the right decision whether it

1:35:45

passes or not. I just think it's the

1:35:47

right decision until we can correct our

1:35:51

process.

1:35:52

>> I will say I feel like I feel like the

1:35:57

disconnect here is communication, right?

1:35:59

Um it seems like there there isn't much

1:36:01

communication happening on an atlarge

1:36:04

basis between the administration and

1:36:06

council. Um and so it kind of comes down

1:36:09

to okay well I'll call your bluff right

1:36:13

you don't talk to me I'll I'll take your

1:36:14

funds right um because the communication

1:36:17

is at a standstill. The unfortunate part

1:36:20

is that

1:36:23

it's the city that suffers, right, by by

1:36:25

the mayor, not talking to council, by

1:36:28

council, not talking to the mayor. I'm

1:36:30

not pointing fingers in either

1:36:32

direction. I'm simply saying that no

1:36:34

matter what the case, if this is how the

1:36:39

communication continues in the future,

1:36:40

the city's not going to move forward.

1:36:42

Um, just because

1:36:45

the residents talk to us, we make it

1:36:47

clear what the residents are telling us.

1:36:48

We make it clear what we're expecting to

1:36:51

get from the administration as far as

1:36:54

communication, as far as reports, um, as

1:36:56

far as community economic development

1:36:58

plans. And it seems like we're not

1:37:00

getting those things. And uh, to my

1:37:03

colleagues points and and then there's

1:37:04

no communication after we don't get

1:37:07

them. Uh, and so the only time we seem

1:37:09

to get the communication is when it's

1:37:11

time for a budget hearing and then, you

1:37:13

know, we kind of get a little bit of a

1:37:14

conversation here and there. Um, so I

1:37:17

think that's kind of where where the the

1:37:19

biggest issues coming in at is just it

1:37:21

seems like we're not talking. So, um,

1:37:24

President Hill,

1:37:26

>> I don't know if I agree with that. So

1:37:28

the quarterly reports

1:37:32

um were implemented as a mechanism

1:37:36

for us to learn what goes on in these

1:37:39

departments and bureaus on a quarterly

1:37:42

basis so that when we arrived at this

1:37:45

point today to vote on a budget nothing

1:37:48

was a surprise. we would have known

1:37:50

maybe months ago in some cases uh what

1:37:53

the needs were and how the departments

1:37:55

and bureaus were operating through their

1:37:57

budgets throughout the year. So I don't

1:37:59

know if it's a matter of communication

1:38:01

and maybe it's one-sided because as I

1:38:03

mentioned during amendment one when the

1:38:06

suggestion was made for city council to

1:38:10

utilize a staffer or staffers in the

1:38:13

communications department to translate

1:38:16

our documents into Spanish. many of

1:38:18

these departments aren't even allowed to

1:38:20

communicate with us. So, that's the

1:38:23

reality. So, it's a one-sided

1:38:25

communication issue. I don't think

1:38:27

anybody up here on this day is um

1:38:32

doesn't want to communicate or maybe

1:38:34

want to foster better relationships with

1:38:36

the directors

1:38:39

um or anyone in the departments or

1:38:43

bureaus under their purview. But when

1:38:46

they're being told they can't

1:38:48

communicate with us, that's crazy.

1:38:51

>> I think that gets exactly to my point of

1:38:54

the issue seems to be communication.

1:38:56

Lack of it.

1:38:58

>> Yeah. But it's not tick for tack. If you

1:39:00

don't speak to me, I'm going to take

1:39:01

your I that's not my narrative. So I

1:39:03

don't want that to be my narrative. You

1:39:06

don't talk to me, so I'm going to take

1:39:07

your funding. But I do think this is an

1:39:10

opportunity for us as a body

1:39:13

to let not only the administration

1:39:17

but our public know that we are willing

1:39:19

to stand to correct what's happening in

1:39:23

our city. If we don't do this and it's

1:39:25

just my opinion if we don't take these

1:39:27

hard stances and we have friends there's

1:39:29

people that I communicate with. This is

1:39:31

not a personal thing in that regard.

1:39:34

It's personal in the city as a whole.

1:39:36

But if we don't take a stance now and

1:39:39

change this direction of the history of

1:39:42

city council and administrations, we

1:39:44

have an opportunity to do that. And I

1:39:46

think um until we can correct

1:39:50

in-house stuff, and I hate to do these

1:39:52

things publicly because it just doesn't

1:39:54

it's not a good look for us. However,

1:39:57

we're not being heard on the other side.

1:40:00

I agree with President Hill. Some people

1:40:02

get phone calls from administration and

1:40:05

others are just completely ignored. And

1:40:07

I agree that we've been told that they

1:40:11

are not allowed to communicate with us.

1:40:13

Now, what does that do for our

1:40:14

constituent services that is bad for our

1:40:18

residents? So, I'm just going to stand

1:40:20

in this space. Whatever the

1:40:22

repercussions to this is, um, Lamont's

1:40:25

willing to stand in it.

1:40:28

>> Councilwoman Davis and then President

1:40:29

Hill. Thank you, President Vice

1:40:32

President Green.

1:40:33

Um, I think that the

1:40:38

uh concern for me is that a lot of the

1:40:41

back and forth is personal.

1:40:44

It is personal. Um, I've heard from

1:40:48

uh members of the administration

1:40:52

and I've sat here, I haven't missed a

1:40:54

meeting since I've been here. um they

1:40:58

feel threatened.

1:41:00

You know, I've watched pretty much I've

1:41:03

watched I've been here watching the back

1:41:06

and forth this total disrespect in

1:41:10

communication.

1:41:11

So, I think that this is good that we're

1:41:15

having this conversation, but

1:41:18

um and it's also an opportunity

1:41:21

to move forward. the administration and

1:41:24

council, we have to communicate. Our

1:41:25

residents deserve

1:41:28

communication without the personal

1:41:31

attacks that I've witnessed. I've

1:41:34

witnessed

1:41:34

>> or the personal relationships if that's

1:41:37

allow everyone to finish speaking.

1:41:44

>> President Hill,

1:41:45

>> thank you. I just wanted to note for the

1:41:47

meeting record that the mayor does not

1:41:49

communicate with me. It's a one-way

1:41:53

phone call. When I call her back, if she

1:41:56

does in fact call, she's only called me

1:41:57

twice this year, it goes straight to

1:42:00

voicemail. So, do you know what that

1:42:01

means? That means I'm blocked on her

1:42:03

phone. So, I wanted I wanted to note

1:42:05

that she only communicates with three

1:42:07

people on council. So, it's never And I

1:42:10

wanted to address Councilwoman Davis's

1:42:13

point. Nothing is personal in this seat.

1:42:18

It is about the residents of the city of

1:42:20

Harrisburg.

1:42:22

That's who we have to answer to. So

1:42:25

nothing is personal. It's business.

1:42:28

I wanted to reiterate with the

1:42:30

communication. Communication is very

1:42:32

important and there is no communication

1:42:35

right now. But I want to I have always

1:42:37

said I will say again one nothing up

1:42:39

here is personal. Everything I am voting

1:42:42

on is because I see our city. We all see

1:42:45

our city and there are at least two

1:42:47

positions on here, business

1:42:48

administrator and Lerta that have a lot

1:42:51

to do with our city and the business

1:42:52

administrator told interim acting told

1:42:54

me last week he had no opinion on

1:42:56

anything that wasn't his business. So

1:43:00

that's concerning. Lerta has so much to

1:43:03

do that that whole position has so much

1:43:05

to do with our city and our economic

1:43:06

development. As I said, we have asked

1:43:08

time and time again, when you don't get

1:43:11

your job done, this is what ends up

1:43:13

happening. It's not personal, it's

1:43:16

business. Also, I've the mayor has

1:43:19

called me probably maybe three times

1:43:21

this year. I cannot call her. I'm

1:43:24

blocked. I cannot send her any text

1:43:26

messages. I am blocked. So, the

1:43:28

communication is only when she wants it.

1:43:31

I am here and I am willing to work with

1:43:33

her whenever. I will take any meeting,

1:43:35

any phone call. had one meeting with her

1:43:37

which was on the $250,000

1:43:39

for senior citizen programming. That was

1:43:42

the only meeting I had with her and

1:43:44

nothing happened after that. So once

1:43:47

again, nothing I'm doing up here is

1:43:49

personal. It is business for our city,

1:43:51

for our residents, and I want nothing

1:43:53

more but to communicate with the

1:43:55

administration so we don't come to or

1:43:57

have to have or make decisions like

1:44:00

this. Thank you.

1:44:04

Any other Councilman Rodriguez,

1:44:06

>> thank you. Um, I too have had my phone

1:44:09

blocked for nearly a year, but all of my

1:44:11

communication goes through my department

1:44:12

directors and they do their best to

1:44:14

coordinate different meetings, whether

1:44:16

it's with the business administrator or

1:44:18

Madame Mayor herself, but I don't let

1:44:20

you know something just like a block

1:44:22

phone or I get it. You know, sometimes

1:44:24

people hate you one day, they love you

1:44:26

the next day, but I still want to try my

1:44:28

best and attempt to reach out in good

1:44:30

hopes to communicate and get things

1:44:32

done. So even if I was referenced as one

1:44:34

of those people reached out, I have to

1:44:36

elaborate and many of you seen me try to

1:44:38

make phone calls and go to voicemail. So

1:44:40

you know um I just I just I'm willing to

1:44:43

try and I care and not saying no one on

1:44:45

this day doesn't and not saying that the

1:44:47

administration doesn't. I just think

1:44:48

it's going to take a lot more to

1:44:50

overcome a lot of the hurdles and

1:44:51

obstacles that we're facing. But I

1:44:53

appreciate everyone's time. Thank you.

1:44:56

>> All right. Any questions regarding

1:44:58

amendment four, which is a motion to

1:45:03

eliminate the funding in the proposed

1:45:04

2026 budget under salaries and wages for

1:45:07

the position of project director for

1:45:09

business development and alert

1:45:10

administrator.

1:45:14

Seeing none, Mr. Trudell, would you call

1:45:16

the vote?

1:45:17

>> Miss Daniels,

1:45:19

>> yes.

1:45:22

Miss Davis.

1:45:29

>> Okay.

1:45:34

>> No.

1:45:37

>> Miss Green.

1:45:38

>> No.

1:45:40

>> Mr. Jones?

1:45:41

>> Yes.

1:45:43

>> Miss Rolls?

1:45:44

>> Yes.

1:45:45

>> Mr. Rodriguez?

1:45:47

>> Yes.

1:45:49

>> Miss Hill?

1:45:50

>> Yes.

1:45:51

Amendment four passes by vote of five to

1:45:53

two.

1:45:56

Excuse me, Vice President Green, just u

1:45:59

just for me just a a simple point of

1:46:01

clarification.

1:46:03

>> Uh project director of business

1:46:05

development and learner administrator

1:46:07

that correct that is just one position.

1:46:10

>> Yes, that is one position.

1:46:11

>> All right. Yeah. Great. Thank you.

1:46:16

>> Amendment number five. I make a motion

1:46:19

to amend the 2026 proposed budget for

1:46:21

the office of mayor by eliminating the

1:46:23

funding in the proposed 2026 budget

1:46:26

under salaries and wages for the

1:46:28

position of director of equity and

1:46:30

compliance.

1:46:31

>> You have a second.

1:46:33

>> It's been moved and second. Is there any

1:46:35

discussion?

1:46:39

>> Yeah. Um, again, this is another

1:46:41

position that, um, you know, since I've

1:46:44

been here, this role has been in

1:46:45

question. And, um, what are we actually

1:46:48

getting out of this department? Um,

1:46:52

again, I think the people in that office

1:46:53

are better suited in a in a different

1:46:55

position. Um, you know, I hate to to be

1:46:58

in a um be in a position to make a

1:47:01

financial decision, but again, this job

1:47:03

wasn't easy, and I knew it when I took

1:47:04

it. Um, again, this isn't about Lamont

1:47:08

where people can say it's personal and

1:47:10

it's really not. Our people that are

1:47:13

paying their taxes and live here in this

1:47:15

city to to deserve better, this is their

1:47:18

tax dollars being spent and if nothing

1:47:20

is being produced [clears throat]

1:47:22

and I will give um, you know, the

1:47:24

individual in that position the benefit

1:47:26

of the doubt being here a short period

1:47:27

of time. However, this was the same

1:47:30

motions that we made last year and I

1:47:32

don't think anything has changed. So,

1:47:35

um, that's where I am on this one.

1:47:38

>> Any other discussion?

1:47:42

>> Counciloman Ross.

1:47:43

>> Yes. I was just going to say, um, I to I

1:47:45

do understand this amendment. I think

1:47:47

that,

1:47:49

um, we haven't seen much movement in

1:47:51

this department, which is once again

1:47:53

very important um, with compliance and

1:47:56

equity and making sure that, um, one,

1:48:00

we're using more individuals from our

1:48:02

city. that has always been an issue. Um,

1:48:05

and if we don't have enough licensed

1:48:07

individuals or companies in our city to

1:48:09

use, then how do we get them to that

1:48:12

spot which dealt with LERA and Equinox

1:48:15

equity and compliance working together.

1:48:17

However, um I do know this role is newly

1:48:21

um the position just got filled and I

1:48:24

would like to see what this individual

1:48:26

does moving forward. So, I will not be

1:48:29

supporting this amendment because I

1:48:30

would like to see her meet her goals um

1:48:34

uh and and do her job well as she laid

1:48:37

out um our last meeting. So, I just

1:48:39

wanted to explain why I was not

1:48:41

supporting this amendment.

1:48:43

Thank you. Um when it comes to this

1:48:45

amendment, I will say um I remember I

1:48:48

think it was three years ago. I think I

1:48:50

was the first person to make this

1:48:51

amendment because I felt like we weren't

1:48:53

getting much from the office. Um, I

1:48:55

think the presentation contains

1:48:57

something of I go to conferences and

1:48:59

take notes for the mayor and I answer to

1:49:01

the mayor. Um, I will say I've seen

1:49:04

development in this role since um with

1:49:07

this with the predecessor as well as um

1:49:10

the individual who currently has this

1:49:12

role. Uh it seems like there is some

1:49:14

movement going on. I would like to see

1:49:16

what comes to fruition. Um I like the

1:49:18

idea of starting an internship program.

1:49:21

I like the fact that we are having

1:49:23

meetings with small businesses and

1:49:25

developers um small businesses and small

1:49:28

developers and uh people from Harrisburg

1:49:31

to teach them how to start businesses in

1:49:34

Harrisburg as well as teaching them how

1:49:36

to um get some of the contracting funds

1:49:40

uh so we can increase our our minority

1:49:42

and DBD excuse me DBE funding um in some

1:49:47

of our contracts. So, I will say um I

1:49:49

will not support this motion uh because

1:49:51

I want to see where it goes. I also feel

1:49:53

like there has been movement in this

1:49:55

position. Are there any other President

1:49:57

Hill?

1:49:58

>> Thank you. Um

1:50:01

I think it's interesting now that you

1:50:04

are supportive of the amendment or not

1:50:07

supportive of this amendment, but

1:50:08

whatever the case. Um, as I read the job

1:50:11

description the other day during the

1:50:14

budget hearing,

1:50:16

um, I don't think that really much of

1:50:20

anything that was shared, um, or even

1:50:24

started relates to the role. So, I will

1:50:28

be uh, supporting this amendment.

1:50:31

>> Thank you. I believe last year I didn't

1:50:32

support it um, if it came forth. Uh, I

1:50:35

don't believe I supported last year. And

1:50:37

um just to note, I think you were the

1:50:39

one that didn't support it when I

1:50:40

originally put it forth. I believe it

1:50:41

was yourself and Councilman Major who

1:50:44

fought to get it back in.

1:50:45

>> Yeah. What happened was I

1:50:48

then recommended a motion to keep the

1:50:52

salary at the same year's salary. There

1:50:55

was no increase for the role. So yeah, I

1:50:57

did um and I thought I found value in

1:51:00

the role, but now um with the new

1:51:04

individual and all that she mentioned, I

1:51:07

just don't feel like there's alignment.

1:51:09

So it's interesting our our minds kind

1:51:12

of changed flip-flopping. Yeah. Any

1:51:15

other questions or comments regarding

1:51:17

amendment five, which is an amendment to

1:51:19

eliminate the funding in the proposed

1:51:21

2026 budget under salaries and wages for

1:51:23

the position of director of equity and

1:51:25

compliance.

1:51:27

>> Yes. Thank you, Vice President Hill. I

1:51:30

think I would um not support this

1:51:33

amendment. I'd like to uh give the give

1:51:36

her an opportunity to um uh develop in

1:51:41

this role. She has a team. She has great

1:51:44

ideas and I think that she would be

1:51:47

competent in this role. So I like to

1:51:49

give her an opportunity. Uh this is an

1:51:52

important uh department and I I don't

1:51:56

want to see it go away. So thank you.

1:52:00

>> Any other questions or comments?

1:52:03

Seeing none, Mr. Trudale, could you call

1:52:05

the vote?

1:52:07

>> Miss Daniels.

1:52:10

>> Sorry, one more time.

1:52:15

Yes.

1:52:16

Could you hear me?

1:52:17

>> Yep. Thank you.

1:52:19

>> Miss Davis?

1:52:22

>> No.

1:52:24

>> Miss Green?

1:52:25

>> No.

1:52:27

>> Mr. Jones?

1:52:28

>> Yay.

1:52:30

>> Miss Rolls?

1:52:32

>> No.

1:52:34

>> Mr. Rodriguez?

1:52:35

>> No.

1:52:37

>> Miss Hill?

1:52:38

>> Yes.

1:52:40

Amendment five fails by a vote of three

1:52:43

to four.

1:52:46

>> Amendment number six. I make a motion to

1:52:50

amend the 2026 proposed budget for the

1:52:52

office of mayor by eliminating the

1:52:54

funding in the proposed 2026 budget

1:52:56

under salaries and wages for the

1:52:57

position of special assistant for the

1:53:00

director of equity and compliance.

1:53:04

Is there a second?

1:53:07

Seeing no second.

1:53:11

Seeing no second, this motion dies.

1:53:16

Amendment number seven. I make a motion

1:53:18

to amend the 2026 budget for the Bureau

1:53:21

of Police by eliminating the proposed

1:53:23

funding in the 2026 budget under

1:53:25

salaries and wages for the position of

1:53:27

director of community engagement and

1:53:29

relations. Is there a second?

1:53:32

>> I second.

1:53:33

It's been moved and second. Is there

1:53:35

anyone interested in discussing this

1:53:37

this amendment?

1:53:41

Um, I'll just say um this has been a

1:53:44

conversation for a couple of years. Um,

1:53:49

I still kind of feel like this role is a

1:53:51

little redundant. Um, and that it seems

1:53:54

like a lot of the the CSAs answer

1:53:56

directly to Captain Winner. And so I

1:54:00

kind of feel like why do we have a

1:54:01

middleman um when it doesn't seem I mean

1:54:04

we have really great national night outs

1:54:07

but I feel like that can be um that's

1:54:10

not an entire year's position. Um and so

1:54:14

I kind of feel like in some ways it's

1:54:15

redundant. Um and that's kind of

1:54:17

something I've said repeatedly and that

1:54:19

one hasn't changed for me.

1:54:22

Any other comments?

1:54:24

No, I would just say my sentiments are

1:54:26

the same as um Vice President um Greens.

1:54:30

I've this was the same for me last year.

1:54:32

I do feel like it's a redundant

1:54:34

position. Once again, nothing personal.

1:54:36

Um it's just to me it's a very redundant

1:54:39

position and unnecessary.

1:54:43

>> Councilwoman Davis.

1:54:44

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Just a

1:54:46

question. Is this for the CSAs the

1:54:50

community?

1:54:51

>> Okay. Okay. Thank you. Any

1:54:57

other questions or conversation?

1:55:01

Seeing none, Mr. Trudeau, would you call

1:55:03

the vote?

1:55:04

>> Miss Daniels?

1:55:07

>> Yes.

1:55:09

>> Miss Davis?

1:55:11

>> Yes.

1:55:13

>> Miss Green?

1:55:14

>> Yes.

1:55:16

>> Mr. Jones?

1:55:17

>> Yay.

1:55:19

>> Miss Rose.

1:55:21

>> Yes.

1:55:22

Miss Mr. Rodriguez.

1:55:24

>> Yes.

1:55:26

>> Miss Hill.

1:55:27

>> Yes.

1:55:29

>> Amendment seven passes by voted seven to

1:55:31

zero.

1:55:34

>> Amendment number eight. I make a motion

1:55:36

to amend the 2026 proposed budget under

1:55:39

the host municipal fee fund by

1:55:41

increasing the grant to local units item

1:55:44

line item, excuse me, by the sum of

1:55:46

$12,600

1:55:48

and designating it to Evolve Youth

1:55:50

Trades. Is there a second?

1:55:53

>> Second that.

1:55:54

>> It's been moved and second. President

1:55:56

Hill.

1:55:57

>> Thank you. Um I authored this amendment.

1:56:00

Um we heard from Miss Robinson. I would

1:56:03

like to correct [snorts] the amount. Um

1:56:07

that amount was for one um one marking

1:56:11

period of instruction.

1:56:14

Um so the the cost is $1,800

1:56:18

per student. Um the request or the total

1:56:21

number of students um that would be able

1:56:24

to participate under this appropriation

1:56:26

would be seven students from the

1:56:28

Harrisburg School District and the total

1:56:30

for the year would be $25,200.

1:56:38

>> Second.

1:56:40

>> All right.

1:56:41

Any discussion on the proposed amendment

1:56:45

to the amendment?

1:56:48

>> 25,000.

1:56:50

>> Just clarification that again this would

1:56:52

provide um a year's

1:56:55

uh coverage tuition for seven students

1:56:59

from the Harrisburg School District to

1:57:01

participate in the

1:57:04

um

1:57:06

Evolve

1:57:08

program. They are currently working um

1:57:11

on a house. So this these students um

1:57:14

would have an opportunity to participate

1:57:16

on that project on day one.

1:57:21

>> Thank you. Any other comments or

1:57:22

questions?

1:57:23

>> Questions for clarity. Thank you, Vice

1:57:25

President Green. So the amount again for

1:57:28

each student is $1,800.

1:57:32

>> That's correct.

1:57:32

>> The first for seven students.

1:57:34

>> Yes.

1:57:34

>> Okay. So I think the amount is correct.

1:57:37

It's not. It's for one uh marking

1:57:40

period. That amount that's noted was for

1:57:43

one marking period. The $25,200

1:57:46

would be for the entire year for seven

1:57:50

students.

1:57:51

>> Got it.

1:57:52

>> Okay.

1:57:53

>> So, for the clarity of the motion, it

1:57:56

may be worth just withdrawing it as

1:57:57

first stated and then restating the

1:57:59

motion.

1:58:01

>> I move to withdraw my motion.

1:58:04

>> Do I need a second?

1:58:06

>> Yes. Second.

1:58:08

>> I would like to make a new motion. I

1:58:11

make a motion to amend the 2026 proposed

1:58:13

budget under the host municipal fee fund

1:58:16

by increasing the grant to local unit

1:58:18

line item by the sum of 12, excuse me,

1:58:21

$25,200

1:58:23

and designate designating it to Evolve

1:58:26

Youth Trades.

1:58:28

>> Have a second.

1:58:30

>> It's been moved and second. Is there any

1:58:31

further discussion or questions?

1:58:35

Seeing none, Mr. truth. Could you call

1:58:37

the vote?

1:58:41

>> Miss Daniels?

1:58:43

>> Yes.

1:58:45

>> Miss Davis?

1:58:46

>> Yes.

1:58:48

>> Miss Green?

1:58:49

>> Yes.

1:58:50

>> Mr. Jones?

1:58:52

>> Yay.

1:58:53

>> Miss Rolls?

1:58:54

>> Yes.

1:58:56

>> Mr. Rodriguez?

1:58:57

>> Yes.

1:58:58

>> Miss Hill?

1:58:59

>> Yes.

1:59:00

>> The amendment passes by vote of seven to

1:59:02

zero.

1:59:03

That is all the mo amendments that were

1:59:06

received prior. I will open it up to

1:59:08

anyone who has any other amendments

1:59:10

they'd like to make regarding the 2026

1:59:13

proposed budget um that was not covered

1:59:15

or that you would like to make a motion

1:59:17

from the floor. If so, now is the

1:59:19

perfect time.

1:59:21

>> Hold on.

1:59:24

>> For point of clarification, you may want

1:59:26

to make a motion if you basically have

1:59:28

decided on the payraises now. It's just

1:59:31

just a simple one to to reduce uh those

1:59:34

numbers to the current levels if that's

1:59:36

what the council's will is.

1:59:41

>> Can we do that before we vote?

1:59:42

>> Right. Can we vote?

1:59:43

>> Well, no, because it's a budget

1:59:44

amendment still. It's in the budget.

1:59:45

You're reducing those numbers in the

1:59:47

budget. You can do it that way.

1:59:49

>> Unless I don't I don't think we have the

1:59:51

answer yet.

1:59:52

>> Ah, it's okay.

1:59:57

>> Yeah.

2:00:02

So if that's all the current amendments

2:00:04

for the budget, I then is that one time

2:00:08

for the last amendment, the wrap-up

2:00:11

amendment

2:00:11

>> that Well, that and you need to talk

2:00:13

about the technical changes.

2:00:14

>> All right. Um I make a motion to approve

2:00:17

the 2026

2:00:18

proposed budget as Oh, wait. No, that's

2:00:21

that's for after

2:00:22

>> that's why I have a line there. Yeah.

2:00:24

All right. I think that is all for the

2:00:26

amendment portion.

2:00:28

Wait, I have a question. Um, can we move

2:00:35

all of the positions that were defunded,

2:00:38

the funds to the host municipality fee

2:00:42

fund?

2:00:42

>> I don't believe so because that is

2:00:44

funded by the host municipality fee.

2:00:47

>> Okay.

2:00:47

>> So unlike un there's certain funds that

2:00:49

are there because of the source of

2:00:51

funding. So that's why that's it's just

2:00:53

general fund money that's left in the

2:00:55

fund balance.

2:00:56

>> Okay. Thank you.

2:01:01

Thank you. I make

2:01:03

I don't think I have to do anything. It

2:01:05

just goes goes back to you right

2:01:08

>> for I think we have to talk about

2:01:11

amending bill 13 and 14 and then 15.

2:01:15

>> Um sorry, Vice President Green. Yes.

2:01:18

>> One one more question just to back up to

2:01:20

all the way to the beginning to

2:01:21

amendment one.

2:01:24

um the city clerk's salary and I know

2:01:27

you started it by by mentioning the the

2:01:30

$80,765

2:01:32

annual salary and then President Hill

2:01:34

mentioned and this is me7,000

2:01:38

are we is really the amount to focus on

2:01:40

in the in the proposed amendment it's

2:01:42

the larger $80,765.

2:01:46

>> Yes, because it passed.

2:01:47

>> Okay.

2:01:48

>> So it'll be the $80,765.

2:01:51

>> Okay. Thank you.

2:01:59

Okay.

2:02:02

So, we have additional ordinances for

2:02:05

amendment bill 13 of 2025.

2:02:10

Mr. Trudeale, could you please read it

2:02:11

into the record?

2:02:18

Bill 13, 2025, an ordinance amending the

2:02:21

codified ordinances of the city of

2:02:23

Harrisburg. Title five, licensing and

2:02:25

taxation. Part five, real estate taxes.

2:02:28

Chapter 5-501,

2:02:30

property tax by establishing for the

2:02:32

year 2026 a tax levy on land and

2:02:35

improvements and providing for the

2:02:37

distribution of taxes levied and

2:02:39

assessed and providing for a tax rebate

2:02:40

for the difference between the tax due

2:02:42

and attributable to the year 2026

2:02:46

tax levy over the tax due and

2:02:47

attributable to the year 2006 tax levy

2:02:51

for qualifying senior citizens.

2:02:54

Thank you. Uh, council members, are is

2:02:58

there an appetite to suspend the rules

2:03:00

for discussion around this or are we

2:03:02

okay to proceed with the vote? What is

2:03:04

your pleasure?

2:03:07

>> Okay, we're good. Um, next we have bill

2:03:10

14 of 2025. Mr. Trudeale, could you

2:03:13

please read it into the record? Bill 14,

2:03:15

2025, an ordinance amending chapter

2:03:18

5-503

2:03:19

tax abatement and exemptions of title 5

2:03:22

licensing and taxation code to further

2:03:24

extend the statutory termination date by

2:03:27

one year to December 31st, 2026.

2:03:30

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

2:03:31

any amendments or questions related to

2:03:35

bill 14 of 2025? Okay, seeing and

2:03:38

hearing none, next we have bill 15 of

2:03:42

2025. Mr. Mr. Trudeelle, could you

2:03:44

please read it into the record?

2:03:46

>> Bill 15, 2025, an ordinance amending

2:03:48

chapter 2-701,

2:03:51

compensation of elected officials of

2:03:52

title 2, administrative code, to adjust

2:03:55

the compensation of the elected

2:03:56

officials of the city of Harrisburg.

2:03:59

>> Thank you, council members. Um, an

2:04:02

amendment was offered earlier.

2:04:04

Councilwoman Davis, what is your

2:04:06

pleasure? Will you be offering your

2:04:08

amendment for a second time or

2:04:12

>> Okay, if you wouldn't mind turning on

2:04:14

your microphone.

2:04:15

>> Yes, thanks.

2:04:16

>> I'll offer it a second time.

2:04:19

>> So, I might read it again. Okay.

2:04:25

>> Thank you.

2:04:27

Good evening again. The issue of salary

2:04:30

adjustments for elected officials has

2:04:33

been revisited on several occasions. Yet

2:04:36

compensation has remained

2:04:41

just Oh, okay. I'm sorry.

2:04:45

I'd like to make an amendment to the

2:04:47

proposed budget to establish the 2026

2:04:50

salary for the mayor at 90,000 and

2:04:54

council members at 22,250

2:04:58

each.

2:05:01

That's it.

2:05:03

>> Is there a second?

2:05:07

I'll second it.

2:05:09

>> Okay. So, there's a motion on the table.

2:05:12

Mr. Chale, could you please uh reread

2:05:14

the motion?

2:05:18

>> Sorry, did you say reread the motion?

2:05:20

>> So, the the motion was to increase or to

2:05:22

decrease the salary as stated in Bill 15

2:05:24

to $90,000 and then the respective

2:05:27

council members to $22,250.

2:05:30

And a point of clarification for I guess

2:05:33

Miss Davis.

2:05:36

Well, not and just that the C the

2:05:37

president of council has a small stipen

2:05:40

above that. Is your motion to keep that

2:05:42

same stipen or is it to

2:05:45

>> Yes.

2:05:45

>> Okay.

2:05:46

>> Yes.

2:05:47

>> And treasur and controller

2:05:51

>> the same. I'm not I'm making a motion to

2:05:54

change anything else.

2:05:58

>> Is that

2:05:59

>> so the

2:06:01

Right. The treasurer and the controller

2:06:05

are included in in bill 15.

2:06:07

>> Yes. That their their uh salaries would

2:06:10

be um adjusted as the budget recommends.

2:06:18

They would both increase. Yes.

2:06:22

Okay.

2:06:25

Is there any discussion on the

2:06:28

amendment?

2:06:30

Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr. Trudale,

2:06:32

could you please call the vote?

2:06:34

>> Miss Daniels,

2:06:36

>> no.

2:06:38

>> Miss Davis,

2:06:40

>> yes.

2:06:41

>> Miss Green,

2:06:42

>> no.

2:06:44

>> Mr. Jones,

2:06:45

>> nay.

2:06:47

>> Miss Rolls,

2:06:49

>> no.

2:06:50

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:06:51

>> no.

2:06:52

>> Miss Hill,

2:06:54

>> no.

2:06:55

>> The amendment fails by vote of one to

2:06:56

six.

2:06:59

Thank you.

2:07:01

So, we still have before us. Never mind.

2:07:04

We're going to go to ordinances for

2:07:06

final passage.

2:07:10

We'll begin with Oh, no. We can't begin

2:07:13

with Bill 12. Bill 13 of 2025. Mr.

2:07:16

Trudeelle, could you please read it into

2:07:18

the record?

2:07:23

Bill 13, 2025, an ordinance amending the

2:07:26

codified ordinances of the city of

2:07:27

Harrisburg, title 5, licensing and

2:07:29

taxation, part five, real estate taxes,

2:07:32

chapter 5-501,

2:07:34

property tax, by establishing for the

2:07:37

year 2026 a tax levy on land and

2:07:39

improvements and providing for the

2:07:41

distribution of taxes levied and

2:07:43

assessed and providing for a tax rebate

2:07:45

for the difference between the tax due

2:07:46

and attributable to the year 2026 tax

2:07:49

levy over the tax due and attributable

2:07:51

to the year 2006 tax levy for qualifying

2:07:54

senior citizens.

2:07:56

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

2:07:58

any final questions, comments, or

2:08:00

concerns related to Bill 13 of 20125?

2:08:05

Okay, seeing and hearing none, Mr.

2:08:06

Trudeale, could you please call the

2:08:07

vote?

2:08:09

>> Miss Daniels,

2:08:11

>> yes.

2:08:13

>> Miss Davis,

2:08:14

>> yes.

2:08:15

>> Miss Green,

2:08:16

>> yes.

2:08:18

>> Mr. Jones,

2:08:19

>> yay.

2:08:20

Miss Rolls,

2:08:21

>> yes.

2:08:22

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:08:23

>> yes.

2:08:24

>> Miss Hill,

2:08:25

>> yes.

2:08:26

>> Bill 13, 2025 passes by vote of 7 to

2:08:29

zero.

2:08:30

>> Thank you. Next, we have Bill 14 of

2:08:33

2025. Mr. Trudeau, could you please read

2:08:36

it into the record?

2:08:39

Bill 14, 2025, an ordinance amending

2:08:42

chapter 5-503

2:08:44

tax abatement and exemptions of title 5

2:08:46

licensing and taxation code to further

2:08:49

extend the statutory termination date by

2:08:51

one year to December 31st, 2026.

2:08:56

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

2:08:57

any final questions, comments, or

2:09:00

concerns related to bill 14 of 2025?

2:09:05

Yeah, I have a question just for clarity

2:09:07

to make sure. Um,

2:09:10

if this is voted down, this won't affect

2:09:12

anyone that's doing business right now

2:09:14

in this space. Correct.

2:09:18

I don't know the answer to that in that

2:09:20

it won't affect anyone who already has

2:09:22

their uh building permit applied for

2:09:25

even though their project's not started,

2:09:27

but would it would affect some of the

2:09:29

projects that have come before you at

2:09:31

land development plans that haven't

2:09:32

gotten to the permit stage?

2:09:37

Okay.

2:09:40

>> Are there any final questions, comments,

2:09:43

or concerns related to Bill 14 of 20125?

2:09:48

I was just going to speak on um why I'm

2:09:51

going to vote yes for bill 14. I do have

2:09:54

concerns. Um it's the Lura program,

2:09:56

correct?

2:09:58

um it does benefit mostly large

2:10:00

establishments, not um

2:10:04

just residents of Harrisburg. And I do

2:10:06

understand that. Um my concern is for

2:10:10

the businesses who currently have land

2:10:14

development plans in right now, right?

2:10:17

They if if this gets voted down, that

2:10:20

could affect them. Correct.

2:10:29

If this is voted down and there's a land

2:10:31

development plan that has come before

2:10:32

you and been approved but hasn't gotten

2:10:34

to building permits yet,

2:10:35

>> right?

2:10:36

>> They would either end up delaying, which

2:10:37

they could do till there is another

2:10:39

alert in place or they would proceed

2:10:41

without one, right? That that would be

2:10:43

where they are. But, you know, you will

2:10:45

always have that equation in when you're

2:10:49

when you're going from a tax abatement

2:10:51

program to a tax abatement program.

2:10:53

>> Okay. So, but um but yeah, the ones that

2:10:55

you most recently looked at, say since

2:10:57

September, construction is a springtime

2:10:59

activity, right?

2:11:00

>> Right. Not winter.

2:11:02

>> Right. So, I'm saying so I don't I I

2:11:03

just have no idea how many of those

2:11:05

projects have started permit

2:11:06

applications were not I I would know

2:11:09

that.

2:11:09

>> Yeah. And that's a concern for me. I

2:11:11

don't know who it would affect. Um and

2:11:13

I'm putting myself in their shoes in

2:11:15

that instance. So, I will be voting yes

2:11:17

for that because of the uncertainty of

2:11:20

um what could [clears throat] happen.

2:11:22

So, I just wanted everyone to know why.

2:11:26

Thank you.

2:11:27

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez.

2:11:29

>> Thank you, Madam President. Um, I guess

2:11:31

I just have a point of information for

2:11:33

Solicitor Grover. I just like to know

2:11:35

with

2:11:37

that directorship, who would be the

2:11:39

learner administrator being that was

2:11:41

stricken out of the budget due to the

2:11:43

amendment, who then even if we this is

2:11:46

passed?

2:11:48

So, I always say the shortest sentences

2:11:50

in the law are the ones that have the

2:11:51

most power.

2:11:53

>> The executive authority of city

2:11:54

Harrisburg is vested in the mayor. That

2:11:56

is the entire sentence. It would be for

2:11:58

the mayor to determine who to assign

2:11:59

those duties to. Um, you don't need the

2:12:02

title to be assigned a duty by the mayor

2:12:04

in the administration. And it does it

2:12:06

doesn't really matter that the job

2:12:07

description says it matters that the

2:12:09

mayor directs someone to help carry out

2:12:12

her authority as the executive. So,

2:12:15

that's that's what matters.

2:12:16

>> All right. Thank you. Sure.

2:12:19

>> Are there any further questions,

2:12:21

comments, or concerns related to Bill 14

2:12:25

of 2025?

2:12:27

Okay. Seeing and hearing none, Mr.

2:12:28

Trudeale, could you please call the

2:12:30

vote?

2:12:32

>> Miss Daniels,

2:12:36

>> no. No.

2:12:37

>> Miss Davis,

2:12:40

>> yes.

2:12:43

>> Miss Green,

2:12:44

>> yes.

2:12:46

>> Mr. Jones.

2:12:47

>> Nay.

2:12:49

>> Miss Rolls.

2:12:50

>> Yes.

2:12:52

>> Mr. Rodriguez.

2:12:54

>> Uh, yes.

2:12:57

>> Miss Hill.

2:12:58

>> Yes.

2:13:00

>> Bill 14 2025 passes by vote of 5 to2.

2:13:04

>> Thank you. Bill 15 of 2025. Mr.

2:13:07

Trudeale, could you please read it into

2:13:09

the record?

2:13:12

Bill 15, 2025, an ordinance amending

2:13:16

chapter 2-701,

2:13:18

compensation of elected officials of

2:13:19

title 2 administrative code to adjust

2:13:22

the compensation of the elected

2:13:23

officials of the city of Harrisburg.

2:13:26

>> Thank you. Council members, are there

2:13:28

any final questions, comments, or

2:13:30

concerns related to bill 15 of 2025?

2:13:38

Okay.

2:13:41

I want to ensure my comments are added

2:13:43

to your record. So, I'm going to repeat

2:13:46

them just for this portion.

2:13:48

I have thought long and hard about Bill

2:13:50

15 of 20125. I am disappointed that

2:13:53

Mayor Williams was not present to

2:13:55

discuss the bill during the work session

2:13:57

on Tuesday, December 9th, 2025.

2:14:01

As I've shared previously, Harrisburg

2:14:03

City Council did not request this

2:14:05

legislation. The legislation was

2:14:07

requested by Mayor Williams. I

2:14:10

understand the neverending role of a

2:14:12

member of Harrisburg City Council.

2:14:14

However, we knew what we signed up for

2:14:16

when we decided to run for public

2:14:18

office. I feel very strongly that

2:14:21

instead of a raise, the mayor, her

2:14:24

administration, and Harrisburg City

2:14:26

Council should focus their energy on the

2:14:29

number of issues present within our

2:14:31

city. There are many blighted properties

2:14:33

throughout the city. dark streets with

2:14:36

no lights, a dying downtown, no real

2:14:39

plan to spur economic development, and a

2:14:42

parking system that will drive anyone

2:14:45

away. These are just some of the issues

2:14:48

that should be discussed and acted upon

2:14:50

instead of a raise. I would like to

2:14:53

remind council that and everyone that

2:14:56

the city treasur's office recently

2:14:58

resumed regular business hours. Finally,

2:15:01

I can count the number of times Mayor

2:15:04

Williams called this council incompetent

2:15:07

under my leadership and she wants a

2:15:10

raise. No. Mr. Trudeelle, please call

2:15:13

the vote.

2:15:17

>> Miss Daniels,

2:15:21

>> no.

2:15:23

>> Miss Davis,

2:15:24

>> yes.

2:15:26

>> Miss Green,

2:15:27

>> yes.

2:15:28

>> Mr. Jones.

2:15:30

>> Nay.

2:15:32

>> Miss Rolls,

2:15:33

>> no.

2:15:35

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:15:36

>> no.

2:15:38

>> Miss Hill,

2:15:39

>> no.

2:15:40

>> Bill 15, 2025 fails by a vote of two to

2:15:43

five.

2:15:46

>> Thank you.

2:15:49

At this time, I would like to pause our

2:15:52

legislative session um for the

2:15:55

amendments that were offered to bill 12

2:15:57

of 2025.

2:16:04

>> So, the there are some technical

2:16:06

amendments from the administration that

2:16:08

should be uh put forth in the record

2:16:11

based on the language of the final

2:16:12

motion.

2:16:13

>> Okay.

2:16:14

>> Um and I said I will do what I can and

2:16:16

Mr. I think McCutchen will do what he

2:16:18

can and uh and Mr. Kenn may have able to

2:16:22

provide some additional if we suspend

2:16:24

the rules.

2:16:27

>> I will entertain a motion to suspend the

2:16:29

rules for further discussion around Bill

2:16:31

12 of 2025.

2:16:33

>> So move.

2:16:34

>> Is there a second?

2:16:35

>> Second.

2:16:35

>> Thank you.

2:16:49

Okay. I don't know who which one of you

2:16:51

will be discussing the technical

2:16:53

amendments related to bill 12 of 2025.

2:16:59

>> Um yeah certainly I I can can start the

2:17:02

discussion if that's if that's

2:17:04

agreeable. Um so um there are

2:17:07

approximately 15 pages within the budget

2:17:10

document that was submitted upon

2:17:12

introduction to city council and

2:17:17

uh the main thing about that about

2:17:19

reviewing such pages and they they

2:17:22

pertain to personnel. Um there are some

2:17:25

integration issues that are in need of

2:17:28

refinement uh with how the budget book

2:17:30

is developed. uh namely

2:17:33

uh for personnel specifically uh there

2:17:36

are very supporting detailed Excel files

2:17:39

that uh deta detail each individual

2:17:42

position and those particular schedules

2:17:45

were developed painstakingly

2:17:48

and were um inter were um uh exported

2:17:54

into the the budget book software which

2:17:57

is the pattern stream which actually

2:17:59

creates uh the the develop developed

2:18:02

budget book. So there's a lot of

2:18:04

programming and a lot of interplay

2:18:06

um between Excel and pattern stream and

2:18:09

then also in the munis system uh there's

2:18:13

a module that's that's that's referred

2:18:15

to as central budget entry or CBE which

2:18:18

is where the heart of the numbers live.

2:18:21

So there is an import from uh Munis from

2:18:25

CBE as well in into the software for the

2:18:28

budget book. So within these 15 or so

2:18:30

pages

2:18:32

there depending on the budget unit and

2:18:34

this this all pertains to the general

2:18:36

fund there is also a location in

2:18:38

neighborhood services for the city

2:18:40

services public works module. Um

2:18:43

anywhere within those particular budget

2:18:45

sections the personnel section section

2:18:48

appears two to three times. uh there's

2:18:51

the detailed which uh line items which

2:18:54

look like an Excel file actually and

2:18:57

then there is also in the uh summary

2:19:00

pages that are that that follow that

2:19:04

detail section there's there's a couple

2:19:05

of places where personnel the numbers

2:19:08

are the subtotals in in those pages in

2:19:12

in the the non excel portion uh we're

2:19:15

we're confident we verified those totals

2:19:18

back to the the budget ordinance

2:19:20

which was um which is what is under uh

2:19:23

review and vote this evening. Um so

2:19:27

there are some u again some errors that

2:19:31

technical errors that relate to where

2:19:33

descriptions didn't come across in the

2:19:34

import. Uh there's some dollars uh older

2:19:39

dollars from the prior year I believe

2:19:40

that are in the one column but are not

2:19:42

part of the total which is fine because

2:19:45

that total actually reconciles back to

2:19:47

what we've uh uh determined for the

2:19:50

budget ordinance. So um it's again make

2:19:54

making a bit of a long story short

2:19:56

there's some fine-tuning that needs to

2:19:57

be done but it's the interplay of

2:19:59

essentially three systems that are uh

2:20:02

creating the budget book and in in some

2:20:04

cases in these particular pages there

2:20:05

are uh some refining technical

2:20:09

corrections that need to be made.

2:20:13

Um and I think that translates into a

2:20:15

motion to provide substitute pages for

2:20:18

those pages that they're talking about.

2:20:20

The understanding is the total doesn't

2:20:22

change a penny of the budget. It's it's

2:20:25

just that the subp parts are

2:20:26

inconsistent because of programming. So,

2:20:29

um, and just for the record, since we're

2:20:32

on the record, it's pages 47, 57, 58,

2:20:38

71,

2:20:39

80,

2:20:41

84,

2:20:43

85,

2:20:45

98,

2:20:46

131, 132,

2:20:49

145,

2:20:52

146,

2:20:54

156,

2:20:55

157, and 221. one. So those pages will

2:20:59

be substituted to the binder when the

2:21:02

program

2:21:04

uh is clarified to to to make the

2:21:06

numbers consistent.

2:21:07

>> I'm sorry. Can you please repeat those

2:21:08

again? I missed some in the beginning.

2:21:10

>> Sure. The page numbers are 47

2:21:14

57

2:21:17

58

2:21:18

71

2:21:20

80

2:21:22

84

2:21:24

85

2:21:26

98

2:21:28

131

2:21:30

132

2:21:33

145

2:21:34

146

2:21:37

156

2:21:39

157 and 221.

2:21:43

>> Thank you.

2:21:48

>> Is there any further discussion on

2:21:52

>> that? That's a wrap on my section of the

2:21:54

of the uh these adjustments. Okay.

2:21:56

>> But there are two other types of motions

2:21:58

that have to come.

2:21:59

>> Okay.

2:22:02

>> I just want to emphasize that these are

2:22:03

only subsidiary schedules that are

2:22:05

intended to support what's already uh

2:22:08

proposed for the ordinance. And uh we've

2:22:11

had a great deal of difficulty with the

2:22:13

software uh the pattern screen software

2:22:16

that's supposed to integrate nicely with

2:22:18

Tyler Munis, but it doesn't always play

2:22:21

fairly. Uh sometimes the goalpost moves

2:22:24

and sometimes there is no goalpost. It

2:22:27

has been a real incredible learning

2:22:29

experience and I apologize for the

2:22:31

inconvenience of having us have to

2:22:33

substitute these pages. Uh but it's a

2:22:36

necessary evil under the circumstances.

2:22:39

>> Thank you. I'll defer to Vice President

2:22:41

Green.

2:22:43

>> Thank you very much. Um I believe this

2:22:45

is the portion where I make the motion.

2:22:47

Like the official motion. No, the next

2:22:48

one. No, no, there's there's a bunch of

2:22:50

smaller motions that have to be made on

2:22:52

the technicals.

2:22:53

>> Okay,

2:22:53

>> which is that was that sheet I shared

2:22:55

with you at the beginning. Um, and one

2:22:58

would be a motion uh to increase under

2:23:03

police personnel uh the total sum by

2:23:06

$14,83

2:23:10

um from errors that had occurred uh in

2:23:13

the budget book. So moving it from

2:23:16

15,386193

2:23:19

to $15,490.96.

2:23:23

I make that motion.

2:23:27

Second.

2:23:30

It's been moved and second. Is there any

2:23:32

discussion?

2:23:35

>> No, but I thought we suspended the rules

2:23:38

for this discussion. So we have to

2:23:40

resume. I'll entertain a motion to

2:23:42

resume the legislative session.

2:23:46

>> Second.

2:23:47

>> Is there a second? Okay. Thank you. Now,

2:23:50

sorry. Go ahead.

2:23:52

>> I'll make the motion

2:23:54

to do what the solicitor just read

2:23:58

[laughter]

2:23:59

>> to to to increase the police personnel

2:24:01

line item by $14,83

2:24:04

to correct errors in that provision of

2:24:07

the budget.

2:24:08

>> Yes. There's a second.

2:24:11

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:24:14

related to the first technical

2:24:16

amendment?

2:24:18

>> Okay, seeing and hearing none, Mr.

2:24:20

Trudale, could you please call the vote?

2:24:22

>> Miss Daniels,

2:24:26

>> yes.

2:24:28

>> Miss Davis,

2:24:29

>> yes.

2:24:32

>> Miss Green,

2:24:33

>> yes.

2:24:34

>> Mr. Jones,

2:24:35

>> yay.

2:24:37

>> Miss Rolls,

2:24:38

>> yes.

2:24:39

Mr. Rodriguez, [clears throat]

2:24:40

>> yes.

2:24:41

>> Miss Hill,

2:24:43

>> yes.

2:24:43

>> That amendment passes by voted seven to

2:24:45

zero.

2:24:47

>> The second involves the fire bureau.

2:24:50

There was a contractual provision that

2:24:53

was uh accidentally left at zero for

2:24:56

what's called longevity for post 2014

2:24:59

uh and the related taxes. Um, and so

2:25:02

that would be a motion to increase that

2:25:06

provision by $66,551,

2:25:11

bringing the total of that provision to

2:25:14

$7,8715,

2:25:18

I'm sorry, $7,871,560.

2:25:24

I make the motion to increase the

2:25:26

longevity line item to comply with the

2:25:29

contractual obligations as stated by the

2:25:31

solicitor.

2:25:33

>> Second.

2:25:33

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:25:35

related to technical amendment number

2:25:38

two?

2:25:40

Okay. Seeing and hearing none, Mr.

2:25:41

Trudeelle, could you please call the

2:25:42

vote?

2:25:46

>> Miss Daniels

2:25:51

one more time. It didn't come through.

2:25:57

Miss Daniels.

2:26:00

>> Yes.

2:26:02

>> Miss Davis.

2:26:03

>> Wait,

2:26:03

>> we we heard that that time.

2:26:06

>> Miss Davis.

2:26:07

>> Yes.

2:26:08

>> Miss Green.

2:26:09

>> Yes.

2:26:11

>> Mr. Jones.

2:26:12

>> Yay.

2:26:14

>> Miss Rolls.

2:26:15

>> Yes.

2:26:16

>> Mr. Rodriguez.

2:26:17

>> Yes.

2:26:17

>> Miss Hill.

2:26:18

>> Yes.

2:26:19

>> That amendment passes by vote of seven

2:26:21

to zero. Thank you.

2:26:24

>> The third is in the Bureau of Codes and

2:26:26

it's actually simply to add a position

2:26:29

without funding at this point that was

2:26:31

discussed during u Miss Wright's

2:26:33

presentation to you for food safety

2:26:35

inspector. Uh it was discussed it's a

2:26:37

July one job but they can't fund it come

2:26:40

July if they don't have it in this

2:26:41

budget. So the position to add is food

2:26:44

safety specialist

2:26:46

uh and it's a management position.

2:26:51

I make the motion to add the position of

2:26:53

the food safety specialist.

2:26:55

>> Second.

2:26:56

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:26:58

related to technical amendment number

2:27:00

three? Okay. Seeing and hearing none,

2:27:02

Mr. Trudeelle, could you please call the

2:27:04

vote.

2:27:07

>> Miss Daniels?

2:27:09

>> Yes.

2:27:11

>> Miss Davis?

2:27:12

>> Yes.

2:27:13

>> Miss Green?

2:27:15

>> Yes.

2:27:16

>> Mr. Jones?

2:27:17

>> Yay.

2:27:18

>> Miss Rolls?

2:27:19

>> Yes. Mr. Rodriguez,

2:27:21

>> yes.

2:27:22

>> Miss Hill,

2:27:23

>> yes.

2:27:24

>> That amendment passes by vote of seven

2:27:25

to zero.

2:27:28

>> Next is in the parks and recreation

2:27:30

department. There was an employee, the

2:27:32

community event coordinator whose salary

2:27:35

was misstated uh in there. So therefore,

2:27:38

that and the wage increase are both

2:27:41

incorrect. So, it would uh change the uh

2:27:47

total budget for that for personnel by

2:27:50

$4,36.

2:27:53

Uh it's bringing it from 651,613

2:27:59

to $655,919.

2:28:04

I make a motion to correct the community

2:28:06

events coordinator salary and associated

2:28:09

um cost as stated by the solicitor.

2:28:13

>> A second.

2:28:14

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:28:16

related to technical amendment number

2:28:18

four? Okay. Seeing and hearing none, Mr.

2:28:21

Trusio, could you please call the vote?

2:28:23

>> Miss Daniels,

2:28:27

>> yes.

2:28:28

>> Miss Davis,

2:28:29

>> yes.

2:28:30

>> Miss Green,

2:28:31

>> yes.

2:28:32

>> Mr. Jones.

2:28:34

>> Yay.

2:28:35

>> Miss Rolls,

2:28:36

>> yes.

2:28:37

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:28:38

>> yes.

2:28:39

>> Miss Hill,

2:28:40

>> yes.

2:28:40

>> This amendment passes by vote is 7 to

2:28:42

zero.

2:28:44

>> Uh the next is in the park maintenance.

2:28:46

There was a an error in the overtime

2:28:48

calculation. Uh and it is an increase of

2:28:52

$25,067

2:28:54

for that for both the overtime and the

2:28:56

related taxes. Um, moving from 93,348

2:29:01

to 108,000 I'm sorry, $118,415.

2:29:07

It's a difference of $25,67.

2:29:10

>> I make a motion to correct the park

2:29:12

maintenance overtime line item as stated

2:29:14

by the solicitor.

2:29:16

>> Second.

2:29:17

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:29:20

related to technical amendment number

2:29:22

five? Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr.

2:29:25

Trusdale, could you please call the

2:29:26

vote?

2:29:27

>> Miss Daniels,

2:29:31

>> yes.

2:29:32

>> Miss Davis,

2:29:33

>> yes.

2:29:33

>> Miss Green,

2:29:34

>> yes.

2:29:35

>> Mr. Jones,

2:29:36

>> yay.

2:29:37

>> Miss Rolls,

2:29:38

>> yes.

2:29:39

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:29:40

>> yes.

2:29:41

>> Miss Hill,

2:29:42

>> yes.

2:29:43

>> This amendment passes by vote of 7 to

2:29:44

zero.

2:29:46

>> And the final one is in the

2:29:47

communications department. Um there is a

2:29:50

union position where the individual

2:29:52

moved up to a a step two earlier in the

2:29:55

year but the original step one numbers

2:29:57

were put in there so it didn't capture

2:29:59

uh so it changes by $3,113

2:30:04

for both the salary and the taxes moving

2:30:07

from $50,241

2:30:09

to $53,355.

2:30:13

I make a motion to correct the

2:30:15

communications line item salary related

2:30:18

to this employee as stated by the

2:30:20

solicitor.

2:30:21

>> Second.

2:30:22

>> Thank you. Are there any questions

2:30:24

related to technical amendment number

2:30:27

five?

2:30:28

>> Oh, six. I'm sorry. Uh could read my own

2:30:31

handwriting. Um seeing and hearing none,

2:30:34

Mr. Trudeelle, could you please call the

2:30:36

vote?

2:30:37

>> Miss Daniels,

2:30:41

>> yes.

2:30:42

Miss Davis,

2:30:44

>> yes.

2:30:45

>> Miss Green,

2:30:46

>> yes.

2:30:47

>> Mr. Jones,

2:30:48

>> yay.

2:30:49

>> Miss Rolls,

2:30:50

>> yes.

2:30:52

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:30:53

>> yes.

2:30:53

>> Excuse me.

2:30:54

>> Miss Hill,

2:30:55

>> yes.

2:30:56

>> This amendment passes by vote of seven

2:30:58

to zero.

2:30:59

>> I believe that is all of them unless

2:31:01

finance has something in addition.

2:31:04

>> Finance, do you have any additional

2:31:06

technical amendments? Is there anything

2:31:08

that we may have missed? Uh, President

2:31:10

Hill, I have no additional technical

2:31:12

amendments. However, I would be remiss

2:31:15

if I didn't own up to the fact that I

2:31:16

screwed up a couple of these things.

2:31:18

This wasn't all just software. There

2:31:20

were a couple things that were my bad,

2:31:22

and I just want to own up and take

2:31:23

responsibility for that.

2:31:24

>> Well, that's okay. But thank you for

2:31:26

taking ownership. We appreciate it. Your

2:31:29

honesty. So, if there are no further

2:31:32

technical amendments at this time, it is

2:31:34

8:36 p.m., we will um pause our meeting

2:31:40

um to allow finance to account for the

2:31:43

amendments that were made.

2:31:46

>> Thank you.

2:31:47

>> Thank you.

2:31:50

>> Is it

4:11:25

Okay, good evening everyone. The t the

4:11:27

time is now 10:16 p.m. I would like to

4:11:32

resume our legislative session.

4:11:37

We left off

4:11:41

with the finalizing of numbers

4:11:44

um from the proposed amendments.

4:11:47

>> So so madame president this these

4:11:49

numbers finance have prepared include um

4:11:52

each of the amendments the council had

4:11:53

made each of the technical amendments

4:11:56

that had numbers associated with them

4:11:58

and the uh removal of the increase in

4:12:02

the 10 public official salary. All three

4:12:04

of those have been accounted for.

4:12:06

>> Okay.

4:12:09

Thank you.

4:12:14

Are we going to read through the

4:12:17

numbers?

4:12:18

>> We would have to read them into the

4:12:19

record. I didn't know if you wanted to

4:12:21

make the motion first.

4:12:22

>> Okay.

4:12:22

>> Or you want So, we could do either way.

4:12:24

We can make the uh a summary of the

4:12:27

changes and make a motion to that. or

4:12:30

you can make your motion to adopt the

4:12:31

budget with the following changes,

4:12:33

whichever the the chair prefers.

4:12:36

>> I'll defer to Vice President Green.

4:12:38

>> I will make the motion first and then we

4:12:40

can read amend. Yes, ma'am.

4:12:42

>> Uh I make a motion to approve the 2026

4:12:44

proposed budget as amended and further

4:12:47

to authorize necessary technical

4:12:49

corrections as discussed in the course

4:12:50

of budget hearings.

4:12:52

>> Second.

4:12:54

>> And would you like me to summarize the

4:12:56

changes?

4:12:57

>> If you would, Solicitor Grober.

4:12:58

>> Thank you.

4:13:00

The uh there is an amendment to uh line

4:13:03

8 section one general fund decreasing

4:13:06

the total budget number from $88,182,276

4:13:13

to 88 million $20

4:13:18

$20,000 and $172. Yeah, whatever it is.

4:13:21

It's late. I'm tired.

4:13:23

uh and then there are corresponding

4:13:25

changes on line uh 10 and 11 to to

4:13:29

represent those number changes. There is

4:13:32

a amendment to line 14 for general

4:13:35

government uh reducing the number uh for

4:13:38

that section from 3,458,978

4:13:44

to 3,419,863.

4:13:50

There is an amendment to line 17

4:13:52

personnel under city council. Uh

4:13:55

reducing that number from

4:13:59

do I got that right?

4:14:02

Okay. From

4:14:05

first for line 17 it's from 43,482

4:14:10

to 391,280.

4:14:16

Is that 86?

4:14:18

It's 80.

4:14:19

>> That's a zero.

4:14:20

>> Zero.

4:14:20

>> So, so I just got a clarification.

4:14:21

Didn't we increase that line item?

4:14:25

>> No.

4:14:25

>> Oh, was the elected official salaries.

4:14:26

I'm thinking, okay.

4:14:27

>> Yes.

4:14:29

>> It's the combination of

4:14:30

>> they were included.

4:14:32

>> So, and line it also amends line 21 from

4:14:36

$557,482

4:14:39

to $545,280.

4:14:42

There is amendments to line 24 into the

4:14:44

mayor's office personnel reducing the

4:14:47

line item from 514,34

4:14:51

to $497,54.

4:14:55

>> It's $519,34.

4:14:59

>> Yeah. Okay. 519,34

4:15:02

>> $594 to $49754.

4:15:07

There is an amendment to line 28 in the

4:15:10

mayor's office reducing it from $583,99

4:15:15

to $562,379.

4:15:20

There is an amendment to line 31 in

4:15:23

personnel reducing the controllers's

4:15:24

office from $184,477

4:15:28

to $179,094.

4:15:32

There is an amendment to line 35 for the

4:15:34

controllers's office reducing the total

4:15:36

budget from $185,72527

4:15:41

to $180,344.

4:15:49

There is [clears throat] an amendment to

4:15:50

line 50 under the Department of

4:15:51

Administration uh reducing the total of

4:15:54

7,246,818

4:15:57

to $7,15,788.

4:16:03

There is a amendment to line 53 under

4:16:07

the office of business business

4:16:08

administrator under personnel reducing

4:16:10

the number from $224,215

4:16:14

to $80,72.

4:16:18

There is an amendment for line 57 for

4:16:20

the total business administrator's

4:16:21

office from $31,365

4:16:26

from to $157,222.

4:16:31

There is an amendment to line 74

4:16:33

personnel under Bureau of Communications

4:16:36

uh increasing the number from $423,255

4:16:41

to $426,368.

4:16:46

There's a amendment to line 78 for the

4:16:48

total for communications increasing the

4:16:51

number from $518,755

4:16:55

to $521,868.

4:17:02

There is an amendment to line 101,

4:17:04

Department of Building and Housing

4:17:06

Development total, reducing the number

4:17:08

from 400, I'm sorry, $73,259

4:17:13

to $617,712.

4:17:18

There is an amendment to line 111 on

4:17:20

personnel Bureau of Business Resources

4:17:22

Development reducing the number from

4:17:25

199,226

4:17:28

to $113,679.

4:17:34

There is an amendment to line 115 total

4:17:37

budget for business resources

4:17:39

development from $26,426

4:17:43

to $120,879.

4:17:48

There is an amendment to line 118

4:17:50

Department of Public Safety uh

4:17:53

increasing the total from 37,579,650

4:17:59

to 37,6678,932.

4:18:06

There is a amendment to line 28 under

4:18:09

Personnel Bureau of Police

4:18:12

uh increasing from 17,971,333

4:18:18

to $18,4064.

4:18:23

There is an amendment to line 132,

4:18:25

Bureau of Police,

4:18:28

increasing the line from 20,731,759

4:18:34

to 20,764,490.

4:18:40

There is an amendment to line 135 for

4:18:42

personnel under fire increasing the line

4:18:46

from 11,430,041

4:18:50

to 11,496,592.

4:18:56

There is an amendment to line 139, the

4:18:58

total for Bureau of Fire, increasing the

4:19:00

total budget from 15,330,678

4:19:06

to $15,397,229.

4:19:12

There is an amendment to line 142,

4:19:15

Department of Public Works, increasing

4:19:18

the line from $9,982,479

4:19:23

to 9,986,785.

4:19:32

There is an amendment to line 60 under

4:19:34

parks and recreation enrichment

4:19:36

personnel uh increasing the number from

4:19:38

1,271,613

4:19:42

to1,275,1919.

4:19:48

There is a line for an amendment to line

4:19:50

164 for the total for parks, recreation,

4:19:52

enrichment for the budget number of

4:19:54

1,890,113,000

4:19:59

to1,894,419.

4:20:08

There is an amendment to line 210 under

4:20:11

section 3 for host municipalities fee

4:20:13

fund

4:20:15

uh increasing the total from $522,842

4:20:20

to $548,042

4:20:23

and making the related uh changes to

4:20:25

line 213 and two4.

4:20:30

There is a change to line 221 under host

4:20:33

municipality fee fund on other

4:20:36

increasing the line from $350,000

4:20:39

to $375,200.

4:20:43

There's a change to line 222 for the

4:20:45

total for host municipality fee funds

4:20:48

increasing the line from $522,842

4:20:53

to $548,042.

4:20:58

There is a change to line 337 section 5

4:21:01

neighborhood services fund uh increasing

4:21:04

the total from $22,67,160

4:21:09

to 22,92,227

4:21:13

and corresponding changes to lines 239

4:21:16

and 240.

4:21:18

There is an amendment to line 251 under

4:21:22

Bureau of Neighborhood Services

4:21:24

Personnel uh increasing the number from

4:21:27

1,340,457

4:21:31

to1,365,524.

4:21:36

There is a

4:21:38

line uh an amendment to line 255

4:21:42

uh for total for parks maintenance of

4:21:45

from $1,84,77

4:21:49

to1,829774

4:22:00

and I believe that represents all

4:22:02

changes.

4:22:11

Thank you.

4:22:14

>> And if it please the the council

4:22:15

president, we will reduce these to a

4:22:17

digital form of changes tomorrow at the

4:22:18

clerk's office prior to submitting to

4:22:21

the mayor for signature.

4:22:22

>> Okay. Thank you.

4:22:33

Yeah,

4:22:41

>> thank you again. Sorry, I couldn't find

4:22:43

my agenda anymore. Okay, so before us we

4:22:47

have bill 12 of 2025

4:22:51

um as amended.

4:22:53

>> You need to vote on that. What the

4:22:54

motion on? Oh, the motion on the floor

4:22:56

for the this the changes. Okay, excuse

4:22:59

me. There's a motion on the floor to

4:23:02

adopt the changes that were physically

4:23:05

made um on bill 12 of 2025. Is there a

4:23:10

second?

4:23:11

>> Second.

4:23:12

>> Is there any final discussion on the

4:23:16

amendments

4:23:18

to bill 12 of 2025?

4:23:22

Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr. Trust,

4:23:24

could you please call the vote?

4:23:28

>> Miss Daniels.

4:23:30

>> Um, this is the final bill, right?

4:23:32

>> No, this is the mot the final motion to

4:23:35

for the technical corrections. Neil or

4:23:37

Solicitor Grover just read into record.

4:23:40

>> Okay. Yes,

4:23:43

>> Miss Davis.

4:23:44

>> Yes,

4:23:46

>> Miss Green.

4:23:48

>> Yes,

4:23:49

>> Mr. Jones.

4:23:50

>> Yay. Miss Rolls,

4:23:54

>> yes.

4:23:56

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

4:23:57

>> yes.

4:23:58

>> Miss Hill,

4:23:59

>> yes.

4:24:01

>> This motion passes by vote of 7 to zero.

4:24:08

>> Thank you.

4:24:16

So now we have bill 12 of 2025 as

4:24:21

amended

4:24:23

for consideration. Are there any final

4:24:26

questions, comments, or concerns related

4:24:29

to Bill 12 of 2025 as amended?

4:24:34

>> Uh just a question for solicitor Grover.

4:24:36

uh when is the deadline for us to be

4:24:38

able to make a decision on bill 12

4:24:40

without forfeiting our our power to

4:24:43

override a veto? So if we want to take

4:24:46

time to have a conversation with the

4:24:47

administration if they're willing to

4:24:48

have a conversation, one is our deadline

4:24:51

before

4:24:51

>> well there's a couple deadlines

4:24:53

involved. One is you would have to

4:24:55

recess the meeting which would allow you

4:24:57

to bring it back. But as of today, if

4:25:00

you have voted on it tonight, um because

4:25:02

of the way the law works, the mayor has

4:25:04

10 days to either approve veto or do

4:25:07

line item vetos or do nothing and let it

4:25:10

pass. You know, just not have it signed.

4:25:12

Those are her options. Um that is on as

4:25:16

of today, May or or

4:25:20

December 26th. Um because although the

4:25:23

city is closed but under union contract

4:25:26

for the 26th it is not a state or

4:25:28

federally declared holiday. So that is

4:25:31

your 10th day. The 10th day would be

4:25:32

Christmas day right now. So that Friday

4:25:35

the mayor would have to act. So if you

4:25:36

move it even by a day, you move it into

4:25:40

the following week. Um and and that will

4:25:44

leave you in the same position you were

4:25:46

in last year.

4:25:47

>> Thank you. I just wanted to make that

4:25:48

clear. um because I would love to be

4:25:51

able to open it up to have conversation

4:25:52

that maybe we might get more

4:25:54

conversation now. Um but I also don't

4:25:55

want to take powers away from from city

4:25:58

council by doing that. So um I do hope

4:26:01

that maybe after this uh you know if

4:26:04

there is a veto forthcoming that at

4:26:05

least it can spur some conversation uh

4:26:08

so that we can come to the best

4:26:09

resolution for the the residents of

4:26:10

Harrisburg.

4:26:12

Yeah, there's a 72-hour wait, a

4:26:15

three-day wait if the mayor vetos it

4:26:17

from a minimum you have and you have to

4:26:18

be done before midnight on December

4:26:21

31st. That's the council. If if they

4:26:23

were to come back, if the mayor had a

4:26:24

veto of anything and the council wanted

4:26:26

to vote to override that, that's your

4:26:28

clock.

4:26:34

>> Thank you. Are there any final

4:26:37

questions, comments, or concerns related

4:26:39

to bill 12 of 2025 as amended?

4:26:47

>> Okay, seeing hearing none, Mr. Trude,

4:26:50

could you please call the vote?

4:26:52

>> Miss Daniels,

4:26:54

>> no.

4:26:55

>> Miss Davis,

4:27:05

Yes,

4:27:07

>> Miss Green.

4:27:08

>> Yes,

4:27:10

>> Mr. Jones.

4:27:12

>> Yes,

4:27:13

>> Miss Rolls.

4:27:16

>> Yes,

4:27:17

>> Mr. Rodriguez.

4:27:18

>> Yes,

4:27:20

>> Miss Hill.

4:27:21

>> Yes.

4:27:22

>> Bill 12 2025 as amended passes by vote

4:27:26

of six to one.

4:27:34

Is there any old business for

4:27:36

discussion? Council members.

4:27:40

Okay, seeing hearing none. New business,

4:27:42

Vice President Green.

4:27:46

>> Yes. Um, thank you, President Hill. Uh,

4:27:49

I would just like to take time to say

4:27:51

thank you to Councilman Daniels. Um, I

4:27:53

know this will likely be your last

4:27:55

legislative meeting with us. Um, so just

4:27:58

thank you for representing the residents

4:28:00

of Harrisburg for what I believe is 12

4:28:02

years. Uh, for advocating for all those

4:28:04

that are often forgotten, for fighting

4:28:06

for the use of language line services

4:28:09

before the issue was popular, uh, for

4:28:11

starting our youth commission, which

4:28:12

still continues on today, uh, giving our

4:28:15

youth the opportunity to get firsthand

4:28:16

experience in our local government. For

4:28:18

chairing different committees from parks

4:28:20

and wreck to building and housing and

4:28:21

community economic development. uh

4:28:23

through the journey of becoming a

4:28:24

mother, starting new jobs, and many

4:28:26

other life milestones, you still took

4:28:28

time to represent the residents of

4:28:29

Harrisburg with respect and dignity. Um,

4:28:32

as a resident of Harrisburg and as a

4:28:34

colleague, I just want to say thank you

4:28:35

for always being you and uh to for

4:28:37

dedicating so many years to the

4:28:39

residents of Harrisburg and the

4:28:40

betterment of Harrisburg. So, just thank

4:28:41

you.

4:28:45

>> Is there any other new business?

4:28:53

Okay, there's no other new business. The

4:28:56

time is 10:33 p.m. I will entertain a

4:29:00

motion to adjurnn.

4:29:01

>> So moved.

4:29:01

>> Is there a second?

4:29:03

>> Second.

4:29:03

>> Thank you. We stand a journ.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free