Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council - Work Session 1/20/2026

2:55:10EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
0:02

All right, good evening everyone. Again,

0:04

thank you. Um, Harrisburg City Council

0:07

hosted an at an executive session,

0:09

excuse me, prior to the start of our

0:10

work session this evening. Um, so I'd

0:13

like to call our work session to order

0:15

at 5:42

0:17

p.m.

0:22

Mr. Humphrey, could you please call the

0:24

role?

0:25

>> Miss Davis,

0:26

>> present.

0:28

Miss Green,

0:29

>> present.

0:30

>> Mr. Jones,

0:31

>> here.

0:32

>> Mr. Lawson,

0:33

>> here.

0:34

>> Miss RWS,

0:35

>> present.

0:36

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

0:37

>> present.

0:38

>> Miss Hill,

0:39

>> present. Thank you. We have a

0:43

semi-lengthy agenda, but I'd like to get

0:45

started and hopefully we can make up for

0:47

some time. We will begin with the budget

0:49

and finance committee. I will defer to

0:51

our budget and finance committee chair,

0:54

vice president Jones, to lead

0:56

discussion.

0:57

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, we have

1:01

from budget and finance. Um, Mr.

1:04

Humphrey, can you please read resolution

1:06

63 of 2026 into the record, please?

1:09

Resolution 3, 2026. A resolution

1:13

approving the first proposed 2026 budget

1:16

reallocation in order to authorize the

1:18

roll forward of certain 2025 budget year

1:20

encumbered commitments and to reaffirm

1:22

certain 2025 capital project and program

1:25

appropriations.

1:27

>> Thank you. Uh gentlemen, can you please

1:30

state your names for the record and

1:32

please give us a overview of resolution

1:35

3 of 2026?

1:38

Sure.

1:39

Bob Kenny, finance director.

1:44

Gotta get used to the new mic. Uh good

1:46

evening everyone. Uh thank you,

1:48

President Hill. Uh Vice President Jones.

1:51

Um what uh Brian McCussen from the U

1:56

accounting um the accounting manager

1:58

here, budget and finance. Um you have uh

2:03

before you the resolution for this

2:05

evening and it's also displayed in Excel

2:08

format. Uh thank you Jared and Cedric

2:10

for doing this. It it makes it easier on

2:12

the eyes.

2:14

Um so this is I don't want to say

2:17

routine but it's the typical first

2:19

budget reallocation adjustment that

2:21

occurs at the start of the new year. uh

2:24

namely we have uh various encumbrances

2:27

which include either purchase orders or

2:30

or contract they're they're called

2:32

contract encumbrances in munis um I

2:35

tried to simplify this um in column um E

2:40

we have the original adopted budget for

2:42

the new year and the proposed budget

2:45

amendment for each line just reflects

2:47

what the open encumbrances were at the

2:50

end of 2025

2:52

still in need still is is a commitment

2:54

and now they're rolling forward into

2:56

2026.

2:57

Um the general fund of course is the

3:00

biggest piece of this and uh if not all

3:04

practically nearly all budget units are

3:06

affected by this uh proposed budget

3:09

amendment.

3:11

Um if uh Cedric if you scroll down

3:14

please to

3:16

um the bottom of the general fund which

3:19

I think it I think it bleeds over into

3:21

the second page.

3:23

So right there uh it's 19.7

3:27

mil uh.7 million is the roll forward for

3:30

the general fund and that is so

3:34

extremely high the the predominant

3:36

factor there is there is the broad

3:39

street market uh expenditure line within

3:42

a facilities

3:44

maintenance and of the 19.7 million 16.5

3:49

is Broad Street and that's that's

3:51

approximately 84% of the total request.

3:54

Uh just for comparison, if we would

3:56

factor that out, that would leave us

3:58

with a roll forward of approximately

4:01

uh 3.2 million, which is more along the

4:04

lines that you typically see in in

4:07

previous years.

4:09

So that is the general fund and um

4:14

somewhat uh favorable news here too.

4:17

part of the way to fund this budget

4:20

adjustment. Uh last year for 2025, you

4:25

may recall there was a delay of course

4:26

in the state budget process to achieve

4:29

the capital fire protection allocation

4:32

for the city. Uh originally the budget

4:34

amount for 25 was 5 million. Uh the

4:38

commonwealth increased that up to seven.

4:41

And the good news here is this uh the

4:43

payment or the check payment just

4:45

arrived last week.

4:47

uh within the treasurer's office. So,

4:49

it's been received and deposited and

4:51

booked, but it is in effect 2026

4:54

revenue.

4:55

>> That's for fire. Correct.

4:56

>> I'm I'm sorry.

4:57

>> Fire capital fire protection.

5:00

>> So, uh we have budgeted for this year uh

5:04

just the 7 million which we anticipate

5:06

to receive uh later on this year when

5:09

the state moves on the uh the new fiscal

5:11

year budget. But with this 7 million

5:13

that that transacted now the the the

5:16

request the reasonable request here is

5:18

to increase our revenue line up to 14

5:20

million to take that into consideration.

5:24

Um so the rest of this funding relates

5:28

to additional draw on cash fund balance.

5:31

Um now the one thing to remember uh

5:35

about the city's budget we we always

5:37

have budget or open encumbrances at the

5:41

end of the year. In other words, not

5:43

still a commitment but not spent. And

5:45

the thing about Broad Street Market,

5:48

16.5 million is is out there in in roll

5:52

forward, but of course the anticipation

5:54

is we will not be spending that much

5:56

>> before the end of the current year. It

5:59

will uh uh spill over into 2027 uh no

6:03

doubt. So, but we still have to reflect

6:06

what what the numbers say and and uh

6:09

budget accordingly.

6:12

Uh that's the general fund and moving on

6:16

down uh all nearly uh all of the main

6:20

funds of the city of course are are

6:22

affected. State liquid fuels fund is

6:24

there. Uh the big roll forward piece is

6:28

uh capital outlay for streets and roads

6:31

uh projects. Um

6:35

moving down to the host fund. Uh again

6:37

this is Broad Street related. There was

6:39

a $500,000 commitment last year. Uh

6:42

that's encumbered at the end of 25 in in

6:45

its entirety. So that's rolling into 26

6:48

for for budget adjustment.

6:50

Uh the next major fund, of course,

6:53

neighborhood services. Um and it's

6:55

predominantly made up of two main two

6:58

main budget units, the public works

7:00

piece and parks maintenance. You can see

7:03

the lines there as they go down the

7:05

list. Um, and uh, Cedric, if you go

7:08

ahead further down, we'll get to a total

7:11

for neighborhood services,

7:14

which is a little over 500,000.

7:18

And again, the way to adjust for this

7:20

accordingly is to utilize beginning

7:22

ofear cash position or or cash carry

7:25

forward, cash carryover. Uh there are

7:28

some encumbrances that involve the three

7:30

burrows of course smaller much smaller

7:33

amounts but they still have uh

7:35

encumbrance commitments.

7:40

So that includes uh the line detail for

7:43

neighborhood services. The next fund is

7:45

the senator's fund. Um not quite $1

7:48

million is still open at the end of 25.

7:50

And this of course relates to the FNB

7:53

stadium upgrade project which is very

7:56

near completion but I I checked with

7:58

facilities maintenance on this and that

8:01

they anticipate that this will be needed

8:03

for for 26 uh the various vendors

8:06

contractor type vendors involved will be

8:08

submitting

8:10

I believe their final invoices. So it

8:12

still is it still is a significant

8:14

commitment out there for the senator's

8:17

fund.

8:21

And there is funding support needed to

8:23

to do that based on what the cash

8:25

balance is in in the senator's fund

8:28

which includes a transfer from the

8:30

general fund uh to bolster that up.

8:35

Uh that's the senator's fund and the

8:37

next three funds are smaller in nature.

8:40

There there are three of the special

8:41

funds including the blight fund, police

8:44

protection fund and parks and wreck.

8:48

the smaller amounts uh but but still

8:50

they're they have commitments uh still

8:52

in effect

8:54

those three

8:56

uh moving down to the final fund on on

9:00

this exhibit A is the capital projects

9:02

fund uh and again streets and roads I

9:05

mentioned there's streets and roads and

9:07

liquid fuels there's a sharing of

9:09

expense there but the bulk of the

9:10

projects are housed in the capital

9:12

projects fund so there are uh um various

9:16

uh incumbrances and and need to be

9:19

rolled uh for roll forward. And again,

9:22

the general fund needs to uh supplement

9:25

the the um resource uh the asset

9:28

resources in that fund to get it to

9:30

where it needs to be. That's the general

9:32

fund transfer piece.

9:38

Uh I can stop and take a breath right

9:40

there. That's that's the the roll

9:42

forward schedule exhibit A. if there's

9:44

any comments or questions.

9:46

>> Uh just for me, um I pretty much

9:50

understand what's happening, but just to

9:52

summarize for uh the public, what's

9:55

happening here is that money that was

9:57

previously budgeted in 2025. Um the

10:00

remaining of those funds still need to

10:02

be utilized in 2026 uh for contracts,

10:06

budget, I mean, um projects that weren't

10:08

paid for that still need to come out.

10:10

So, is that correct?

10:12

>> Yes. Yeah, that that that's the

10:14

understanding given that uh most

10:16

departments prepare their budget

10:19

uh needs ahead of the the old year

10:22

ending. So, they're looking forward and

10:24

we of course we necessarily don't know

10:26

what is going to be paid by the end of

10:28

the year when we're working on the

10:30

budget in November uh with with those

10:32

final couple of check runs that happen

10:34

in in December.

10:37

>> Okay. Um, I just wanted to do that from

10:40

myself and uh edification for our

10:42

residents and I can open the floor if

10:44

you guys um if anyone has any questions.

10:47

I'll open the floor up and I'll start to

10:49

my immediate uh right with uh

10:53

Councilwoman Green.

10:55

>> Good evening, gentlemen. Thank you for

10:57

being here tonight as always. Uh I don't

10:59

have any questions for you. It's a

11:00

pretty standard thing that we do every

11:01

year. So, thank you for being here.

11:03

Thank you,

11:04

>> Councilman Lawson.

11:06

Thank you. I I do not have any

11:08

questions. Thank you for a very thorough

11:10

presentation. Definitely appreciate it.

11:12

>> Certainly.

11:13

>> Councilwoman Davis.

11:15

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Good

11:18

evening, gentlemen. I don't have any

11:20

questions. Thank you for being here.

11:22

>> Councilman Rodriguez.

11:25

>> Thank you. Uh good evening. Thank you

11:26

for your presentation thus far. Uh my

11:29

question um is kind of around the

11:32

remaining funds from the trash relief uh

11:34

fund. Is that a part of the rollover

11:37

from the 1.4 or the estimated cash

11:39

carryover from public works? There was

11:42

still a small balance left from the

11:43

trash relief funds. It was around that.

11:45

That's why I asked um you actually could

11:48

still see it too, Mr. Brian.

11:52

>> I I think I'm on to what you're

11:54

referring to, but when when you say the

11:56

1.4

11:57

>> right there, I was just guessing that

11:59

that would be the line the cash

12:00

carryover because it was generally

12:02

around that ballpark, the 1.14. Oh,

12:05

okay. Uh

12:06

>> or or does that money get rolled over?

12:09

>> Well, it just just to clarify because

12:12

what we're looking at right there,

12:13

what's what's highlighted really is the

12:15

capital projects fund, which is not the

12:18

the the 2 million relief, right, that

12:21

came into neighborhood services

12:24

as income, as revenue to

12:27

>> uh that that fund, you know, before the

12:29

end of last year. So it it it created

12:32

the ending of course u it it

12:35

strengthened up the cash balance at at

12:37

the end of 25 but the roll forward

12:40

request for neighborhood services is a

12:43

little over 500,000.

12:45

>> Okay.

12:45

>> For for the new year.

12:46

>> All right. Thank you.

12:47

>> Sure.

12:49

>> Councilwoman Ross.

12:51

>> Thank you Vice President Jones. And

12:52

thank you both for being here tonight.

12:54

Um this is a standard procedure so I

12:56

don't have any questions. Thank you.

12:59

President Hill,

13:00

>> good evening. Thank you. I don't have

13:02

any questions around exhibit A.

13:05

>> Thank you. You may proceed.

13:08

>> Okay. Uh just one one additional exhibit

13:11

uh exhibit B and uh the presentation

13:16

here is just a formal reminder to to

13:19

council to be aware of the they're

13:23

they're entitled budget reappropriation

13:27

uh items and they mainly represent

13:30

capital uh type expenditures in nature

13:33

and and more so grant uh expenses that

13:36

are funded by the grant funds. Uh the

13:39

first one up here relates to the

13:42

$500,000 to move to the fire protection

13:45

fund. It's all aimed at bolstering that

13:48

fund in anticipation of the need uh for

13:51

the uh new apparatus uh fire truck uh

13:55

equipment uh that is materializing in

13:58

the new year.

13:59

So that that's to uh prepare that fund

14:02

or or or move the funds from the general

14:04

fund. Uh the next section and these are

14:07

all footnoted of course you can see on

14:09

the left there um this uh item B

14:14

footnote B um and it relates to the Dock

14:17

Street Dam where the city is uh in the

14:21

mindset of the um the permanent boy

14:25

installation project which um there is

14:29

this is sort of very preliminary or very

14:32

very early stages but but But the

14:35

strategy here is that to be aware of a

14:37

uh uh reimbursement agreement through

14:40

the Commonwealth, which would uh work

14:43

toward what what what this project

14:46

entails right now, the the the $2

14:48

million for that particular line. That's

14:50

all contained within the state grants

14:52

fund. The city hasn't uh incurred uh as

14:56

of yet any expense related to this

14:58

project.

15:00

Uh the next in in the midsection here,

15:03

footnotes C through I all pertain to

15:07

what originally was uh achieved through

15:11

the American Rescue Plan Act, but of

15:13

course uh everybody has heard me say it

15:17

where those funds for the most part were

15:19

were transferred to the general fund as

15:21

revenue replacement. Uh accordingly, the

15:24

general fund has funded these particular

15:26

initiatives.

15:28

Um, and I I I believe you're familiar

15:31

with with with most if not all of these

15:34

uh the the various initiatives including

15:36

affordable housing, um the home repairs,

15:40

the senior program, uh the uh demolition

15:45

uh efforts. Actually, that one is nearly

15:48

uh all but exhausted. There's only um in

15:51

in in column E, these amounts really

15:53

reflect what's still available in

15:55

project budget.

15:57

And the two bottom lines then pertain to

16:00

the Hall manor pool project which is

16:01

broken up into two phases. Phase one has

16:04

had some activity uh because it was it

16:08

was it was the original amount for phase

16:10

one was 2 million.

16:13

So phase one is being uh is what has

16:17

been active at this point.

16:20

Again this is all contained within the

16:22

state grants fund. So we can track uh

16:24

the activity uh through uh grant project

16:28

identifiers or project strings in in

16:31

Munis.

16:34

So that that's that piece. The bottom

16:36

piece um

16:38

um is and if Cedric if you could please

16:41

scroll down to the next section which is

16:44

coming out of the federal grants fund.

16:46

That's fund 14. Um,

16:49

this relates to the multi- parks and

16:52

playgrounds improvement project that uh

16:56

is being funded by that significantly

17:00

large uh 13 plus million dollar grant

17:03

that's that's HUD source and is being uh

17:08

passed through from uh from DCED.

17:11

And again, these these remaining amounts

17:13

show the project budget that is still

17:14

been that has been available. There's in

17:16

in recent months there's been heavy

17:18

activity uh on the projects which you

17:21

know on those footnotes identify the

17:24

locations as you can see there including

17:27

the sports field uh reservoir park and

17:29

Wilson playground.

17:32

So much expending has occurred and then

17:35

the on on the flip side of this this is

17:37

a reimbursement grant. So there is

17:39

significant already the uh through the

17:41

grants department they've been putting a

17:43

lot of effort into realizing those funds

17:46

to turn it around to reimburse the city

17:48

which has uh has been occurring in

17:51

recent weeks.

17:56

>> So that that uh covers those sections. I

17:59

can stop right there for any comments or

18:02

questions.

18:03

>> Thank you. Um I really don't have no qu

18:06

any questions. Um I do, but I think uh

18:10

um parks and reccks coming up, so I'll

18:12

save that for them. Um I have no

18:15

questions. And again, I'll open the

18:16

floor this time. I'll go to uh my far

18:18

left and start with Councilwoman Davis.

18:21

>> Thank you. I do have a question about

18:23

your last point. Um, you mentioned the

18:26

federal grant is $13 million that comes

18:30

down from the government and then the

18:34

various departments have to reimburse

18:36

the city. Is that correct?

18:40

Well, maybe I didn't say it clearly

18:43

enough, but it's it the the city pays

18:47

out uh ma mainly to the the vendors that

18:50

were that are involved in these various

18:53

pieces and then that um payment

18:56

information, proof of payment gets

18:58

submitted to uh the department of

19:00

community and economic development. And

19:03

there's also a uh a conjunction with HUD

19:06

too. HUD HUD system has to be involved

19:09

and and the two pieces come together but

19:11

and then but DCEED reimbures the city.

19:15

Um it's just there. It's one department

19:18

at at the state level.

19:21

But uh as um as as Vice President Jones

19:25

mentioned, this this is all under the

19:27

oversight and uh uh workflow process

19:30

through the uh the parks and recreation

19:34

>> department of the city. Thank you.

19:38

>> And facilities maintenance, they they

19:39

they play a role, too. I'd be remiss if

19:41

I didn't say that. Okay.

19:47

>> Uh, Councilman Rodriguez.

19:50

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Um, and

19:52

I don't mean to sound redundant, Mr.

19:54

McCutchen. Um, if the rollover or the

19:58

encumbered commitment from the uh trash

20:01

relief program is not recognized through

20:03

line C through I, where would I be able

20:06

to find that balance?

20:08

What's left from the program? Because

20:10

that was an encumbered commitment from

20:12

25,

20:15

>> right? Uh, but you um

20:18

>> there was roughly still a million

20:19

dollars left from the trash relief

20:21

program. So, I'm just trying my best to

20:24

follow those funds so we know um what's

20:26

left, how many more families we could

20:27

assist, etc.

20:29

>> Oh, okay. Um

20:30

>> we don't call it ARPA funding no more

20:32

because it of course. So, correct. I'm

20:34

trying to not say that but to identify

20:36

it, it was through the ARPA program

20:38

which became the trash relief program.

20:40

So, if that's not identified through C

20:42

through I, where could we get a grasp on

20:44

where or how much left is in that

20:47

program?

20:48

and um through the business

20:52

administrator's office. I I wasn't

20:54

involved in the detailed tracking of of

20:56

of what you're saying about which which

21:00

refugees disposal accounts in thei in

21:02

the system in the main frame are being

21:04

adjusted accordingly. uh there there is

21:06

there was a developed list for that on

21:09

on on the financial side why we're not

21:12

seeing up here

21:15

in that midsection I mentioned ARPA the

21:17

the $2 million in full was completely

21:20

transa uh transferred in in 2025 meaning

21:25

that had it not been transferred we

21:28

would still see it up here but uh it

21:31

happened late last year it was moved

21:33

from the state grants fund where where

21:36

it's being tracked and allocated and it

21:39

was transferred into neighborhood

21:40

services the the full 2 million those

21:43

are the financial dollars along those

21:45

lines um I circle back to what I what I

21:49

commented about the uh the business

21:51

administrators department about uh

21:54

working off of a um of a listing of

21:58

accounts that were to benefit. So I I I

22:01

can't I can't detail that for you.

22:04

believe Antonio is here. Would he mind

22:05

giving us um maybe an update about that

22:09

if possible? Like I said, I don't want

22:11

to sound redundant, but I just want to

22:12

make sure we're keeping a track of that.

22:14

And you know, because if there are more

22:15

dollars that could assist families and

22:17

local businesses, that's something we

22:19

definitely want to project and get out.

22:20

>> I understand what you're saying. Y

22:25

>> it actually did. They allocated money to

22:26

churches.

22:31

Church is a nonprofit business.

22:36

Hello, council. Hello, special assistant

22:39

in the business administrator's office.

22:41

Uh, so yeah, just to give an update on

22:42

the trash bill forgiveness program. Uh,

22:45

we did launch uh phase three. So that

22:47

went out to 578 residents. Uh, so they

22:51

have uh 10 days from the time that the

22:54

letter was mailed to get it back to us.

22:56

Um, so that timing is still ongoing. Uh

22:58

basically they have effectively until

23:01

like the beginning of next week to get

23:02

it back to us.

23:03

>> Perfect.

23:03

>> Um so we're we're getting that ongoing.

23:06

Phase one was also residents and then

23:07

yeah phase two was was churches that we

23:09

we gave back. Uh we did the list for

23:11

churches was

23:11

>> that went through hardship during the co

23:13

pandmic.

23:14

>> Right. And it was basically everyone

23:15

that went through hardship during that

23:17

time and still had a a delinquent

23:19

account. Absolutely. Um we didn't you

23:21

know there was no extra parameters on

23:22

that one.

23:23

>> Right. Right. Right. Right. Right. No.

23:24

And I I was clear. I actually spoke with

23:26

um your office about that uh early on.

23:29

So I was aware of it. I've also stated

23:31

that on the record. Um completely aware

23:33

that some churches that went through

23:35

financial hardship due to the COVID 19

23:37

pandemic did receive relief. No no uh

23:39

fighting against that. Just more more in

23:42

the sense trying to keep a track of

23:43

those dollars and how we could, you

23:45

know, stretch it as far as possible to

23:46

assist more residents in the city. That

23:48

was all.

23:49

>> Absolutely.

23:49

>> No malice behind it at all.

23:50

>> No, no, no, no. Yeah, you're good. I

23:52

just wanted to be clear that there is.

23:53

Yeah. Um Yeah. And if depending on how

23:56

many residents return it in phase three,

23:58

we could get as close as about uh $250

24:01

$300,000 remaining, but that would be

24:03

with a near perfect return rate. So uh

24:06

obviously we don't expect that. So uh

24:08

there will likely be some extra funds

24:10

left over and we'll have to figure out

24:11

>> and you guys will just keep getting it

24:13

out there trying to

24:14

>> we'll have to figure out what the next

24:14

steps are.

24:15

>> Perfect. Thank you so much for that

24:16

answer. Nothing further. Thank you.

24:18

>> Thank you.

24:20

>> Um Councilwoman Ross.

24:23

Uh, thank you, Vice President Jones. I

24:25

don't have any questions.

24:27

>> President Hill,

24:29

>> thank you. Um, I have two questions. Um,

24:33

one regarding the

24:37

the pool improvements you mentioned

24:40

phase one

24:42

um is completed, has been completed or

24:45

is near completion. Can you speak more

24:47

to that or should I wait for parks and

24:49

wreck to provide an update there? Uh

24:52

that yeah that's that's probably a

24:53

better bet. But it

24:55

>> I just wanted to

24:56

>> it's but actually it's just been a minor

24:58

chipping away because if you recall it

25:00

was 2 million for phase one. Yes. But

25:02

there's still uh a little over 1.9

25:05

million available.

25:06

>> Okay. Well, I'll follow up with them.

25:08

>> Sure. Certainly.

25:09

>> Thank you. And while you're here,

25:10

Antonio, I have additional questions

25:13

regarding the um trash bill relief if

25:16

you don't mind. Um, you mentioned

25:20

so I think let me back up. The last time

25:23

you were before us was in December and

25:25

at that time I think phase the end of

25:29

phase one was nearing at that point. So

25:32

how many people um received the relief

25:37

from phase one that allowed you to move

25:39

to phase two with churches and then how

25:41

many churches? So how many people were

25:43

impacted in phase one and received the

25:45

relief?

25:46

>> Okay. So I don't remember the exact

25:48

numbers but round like rough ballpark

25:50

numbers it was about 550 were sent in

25:53

phase one approximately 265

25:59

roughly uh returned. So that's how many

26:01

people would have received the

26:03

forgiveness the first time.

26:04

>> Okay.

26:04

>> Um churches it would have been around 25

26:07

were sent out and about 20 returned. So

26:10

20 of them received uh the forgiveness

26:12

and this time we sent out 578. So, we'll

26:15

have to see how many return by the end

26:17

of the phase. Uh, I think so far we're

26:20

at around 70 have returned.

26:23

>> Okay. And when is this phase over?

26:25

>> Uh, the beginning of next week. So, they

26:27

have till till then to return it to us

26:29

either via mail or in person.

26:31

>> Okay.

26:32

Thank you for clarifying. I don't have

26:34

any other questions.

26:36

>> Councilwoman Gray,

26:38

>> thank you very much. I don't have any

26:40

questions regarding this. I think the

26:41

questions I have have been asked and

26:43

answered. Councilwoman,

26:46

I mean, excuse me, Councilman Loss.

26:50

>> No problem. Thank you very much. Um, uh,

26:54

Vice President, and I don't have any

26:57

questions. Just a a a statement, uh,

27:00

based on, uh, things that I've heard

27:02

from from people questioning, um, if we

27:05

were going to keep up with the ARPA

27:08

funds once we put them into the general

27:10

fund. So, I appreciate,

27:13

you know, detailing that we're still

27:14

following the plan that we had laid out

27:17

um for the ARPA funds before we we

27:19

transferred to the general fund so that

27:21

the public is aware that no, it did not

27:24

just go to pay the city's bills. We are

27:26

making the improvements that um we

27:28

determined uh previously. So, thank you

27:30

very much for that.

27:37

>> All right. If anyone has any more

27:39

questions or comments, um, thank you

27:41

guys for your presentation and I would

27:42

ask that resolution three of 2026 be

27:46

moved to our next legislative session

27:48

for vote and I would ask my colleagues

27:49

to support. Thank you.

27:51

>> Yeah. And um, Vice President Jones, just

27:54

one quick followup if

27:56

>> No, your time is expired. Now I'm

27:58

messing with you. Go ahead.

28:01

>> Clock is um the clock is out. Um, no.

28:04

back on uh the 15th when we were working

28:07

through the final phases of the budget

28:08

process, I gave an overview about the

28:10

general fund. Since it's such, you know,

28:12

significant roll forward, I I back at

28:14

that time, I I I said our cash position

28:17

should be I was estimating uh between uh

28:21

21.5 and 22 million. And of course, now

28:25

that the the old year has been closed

28:26

and we're underway with the new year,

28:28

the general fund's cash position at the

28:30

end of 2025 is 14.4 4 million. So had

28:35

the capital fire protection

28:37

materialized, that would have been

28:39

another 7 million. It would have brought

28:40

it up to kind of what we were expecting

28:43

uh for year end. But I I just thought

28:46

that would be a nice uh tiein to what we

28:48

proposed this evening for, you know,

28:50

increasing that revenue.

28:52

>> That's weird. That number is the same as

28:54

for the broad street market that

28:56

>> 14.4 exact number, isn't it?

28:59

>> Oh, it's uh it's close. that budget

29:01

adjustment that was done in in the prior

29:04

year.

29:04

>> Yeah. All right. Thank you, guys.

29:06

>> Very good.

29:06

>> Yep.

29:07

>> Thank you,

29:08

>> President Hill.

29:09

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones. Next,

29:12

we have the business of the Community

29:14

and Economic Development Committee. I

29:17

will defer to our community and economic

29:19

development committee chair, Councilman

29:22

Lawson, to lead discussion.

29:26

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Um

29:30

u Mr. Humphrey, could you please read uh

29:34

resolution for 2026 into the record?

29:39

>> Yes. Resolution 4 of 2026, a resolution

29:42

approving the preliminary/final land

29:45

development plan for 1332 North Second

29:47

Street, submitted by Adam Brenamman of

29:50

Brenamman Properties LLC to expand the

29:52

existing non-conforming multif family

29:54

dwelling use on site by converting space

29:57

occupied by the former funeral home

29:58

funeral home and associated site and

30:01

access improvements.

30:03

>> Thank you. And um Mr. tonight if you

30:06

could uh expound on uh what we have here

30:09

in this resolution so that we have

30:11

information for council.

30:12

>> Uh sure. As uh Cedric noted, uh this is

30:15

a proposal uh to expand an existing uh

30:18

multif family dwelling at 1332 North

30:21

Second Street. Uh the property is or was

30:24

uh the New Meire Funeral Home. Uh so it

30:26

was a funeral home on the first floor

30:28

and there were five apartments above it.

30:30

Um and the current proposal uh involves

30:34

um establishing uh eight units in uh the

30:37

first floor and uh which is a bit more

30:39

of a sprawling than the upper floors of

30:41

the of the building uh for a total of I

30:44

believe uh 12 or sorry 13 overall um

30:48

apartment units in the building. Um the

30:51

uh I believe the new meer funeral home

30:54

uh exited the uh property sometime in

30:57

the middle of last year. So, the

30:58

property has been vacant for a little

31:00

bit. Um, and uh the applicants came

31:02

through uh for both the zoning relief

31:05

necessary to expand the non-conforming

31:06

use of the multif family uh dwelling.

31:09

Um, and uh I believe that was the only

31:12

zoning relief they needed. Um, there is

31:14

a large accessory surface parking lot on

31:16

site uh that's just to the uh south of

31:19

the property that has I think in the

31:21

neighborhood of 35 spaces. so they have

31:23

enough off- streetet parking uh for uh

31:26

any tenants or their guests of the

31:28

property. Uh and um overall uh this is a

31:33

fairly straightforward proposal for

31:34

reuse of the funeral home. Um you know

31:37

they've uh there are it seems to be the

31:42

uh most reasonable uh reuse for this

31:44

space as opposed to something else like

31:46

I don't know convenience store,

31:47

restaurant or something like that. And

31:49

as council knows, you know, the

31:50

provision of um housing helps put a

31:53

downward pressure on uh the housing

31:55

costs in the city here. So, more housing

31:56

units on our inventory are always

31:58

helpful uh to help address that. So, uh

32:01

with that being said, the planning

32:05

commission uh recommended that city

32:08

council approved the request with the

32:09

following conditions. Uh any exterior

32:11

alterations to the property must be

32:13

submitted for review by the city's

32:14

historic preservation specialist and may

32:16

require har approval of of a certificate

32:18

of appropriateness application. Um and

32:21

the applicant must coordinate with the

32:22

department of public works regarding the

32:24

size, location, and screening of any

32:26

required refuge containers. Uh planning

32:28

bureau recommends the applicant consider

32:29

eventually consolidating all refuge

32:31

storage and access in the existing

32:33

carport along the CER street frontage of

32:35

the building. I know during the planning

32:37

commission meeting they had indicated

32:39

that they uh may be looking at some

32:41

other alternatives and um I think uh in

32:44

their coordination with the department

32:45

of public works they may in fact tell

32:47

them that they need a dumpster to be

32:48

placed in the um in the on-site parking

32:50

lot. So uh we leave it up to the

32:52

applicant to work with um department of

32:54

public works to find the best solution

32:55

uh in that case. Uh the planning

32:57

commission recommends city council

32:58

approved the request for the following

33:00

reasons. The adapter for use of a vacant

33:02

and underutilized funeral home into

33:04

apartments represents a sensible

33:05

expansion of the existing multif family

33:07

dwelling use on site and the project can

33:09

adequately address the primary concern

33:10

regarding such proposals specific

33:13

specifically the provision of off

33:15

streetet parking for tenants and their

33:16

guests. Uh other conversions of former

33:19

commercial spaces elsewhere in the city

33:20

have demonstrated such projects do not

33:22

adversely impact the neighborhoods in

33:23

which they are located and often help

33:25

catalyze other improvements in those

33:26

communities. And finally, the proposed

33:28

redevelopment will add new residents to

33:30

the neighborhood to activate the street

33:31

on nights and weekends and grow customer

33:33

base to support local businesses and

33:35

will provide additional units to the

33:37

Midtown housing inventory. Uh, and with

33:39

that, um, I'll let the applicant

33:41

introduce themselves.

33:45

>> Council, my name is Michael White, um,

33:47

director of acquisitions and development

33:49

for Brenamman Group. Happy to be here.

33:50

Thank you for hearing our proposal.

33:53

Um, I could Would you like me to to

33:57

continue with the description of the

33:58

project or

34:00

>> Yes, please.

34:01

>> Okay. Um, so some of the facts, uh, Jeff

34:05

already noted, but it's an existing uh,

34:08

8,500 square foot building. Um, there is

34:11

a 5,000 square foot commercial space.

34:13

Um, if I could I could clarify, it's

34:15

being it's in light use right now. the

34:17

the current operator of the New Meire

34:20

Funeral Home is is doing sparse services

34:22

there and is is planning to to uh to

34:26

cease operations. Um above it there are

34:29

five existing apartment units. Um and

34:33

then in addition to the building there

34:35

is uh 35 parking spaces. So has a really

34:39

sizable uh parking lot and a larger lot

34:42

um in general almost a half acre. Um,

34:46

you know, with the sale, there is an

34:47

additional surface parking lot, uh, 122

34:50

Calder Street. Um, everything that, um,

34:54

you know, Jeff mentioned in terms of,

34:56

uh, of proposals for improvements that

34:57

we are, we are open to. The one the one

34:59

question that we did have in terms of

35:00

refu we're open to working with public

35:04

works to find, you know, the best

35:05

solution to consolidate trash in a way

35:07

that that doesn't um, you know, expose

35:09

residents or the, you know, the public

35:11

in a way that's that's unsettling. Um we

35:14

have uh uh we're proposing or we're

35:17

approved for eight units in the existing

35:20

funeral home space. Um we have uh a

35:24

great team. We're working with with CDA

35:25

Dawson Architects uh on the project. Uh

35:28

we're working with Inen Co. for the

35:30

construction uh Midtown Property

35:32

Management to to manage once it's

35:34

stabilized. Um we have a proposed

35:39

loan construction closing date. um

35:42

probably the middle of March, but our um

35:45

you know our final uh deadline for that

35:48

or what our goal would be would be by

35:49

the end of March. Um we can commence uh

35:53

construction after you know permit

35:54

feedback um probably about 35 to 45 days

35:58

after that. And uh we hope that we have

36:01

a very conservative timeline just given

36:03

our prior experience of of an

36:04

eight-month uh construction period. Um

36:07

and then thereafter a two to to four

36:10

month stabilization and lease. Um we're

36:13

we're really excited about the project.

36:15

Um we think that it's a it's a unique

36:17

building. It's a unique site. We hope to

36:18

make it a, you know, a wonderful

36:20

addition to the community and, you know,

36:21

add housing units. Um, and, you know,

36:24

looking forward to questions and

36:26

prepared to to help fill in any details.

36:29

Thank you.

36:30

>> Thank you very much, Mr. White. Um,

36:33

thank you. You answered one of my

36:35

questions was just making sure that you

36:37

had the uh the financing in place

36:39

because we see many people that come

36:40

before us

36:41

>> and we approve the the deal and then

36:44

things just don't happen. So, love that

36:46

you you already have that duck in a row.

36:49

Um, one question I would have for you is

36:52

uh you're using Inch and Co. as your

36:54

your general contractor. Do you have any

36:56

say um if you're as if you are able to

37:00

work with any of our um uh diverse uh

37:04

minority businesses in in the area in

37:06

the construction of this this project or

37:08

is that completely in the hand of your

37:11

general contractor?

37:12

>> Uh it's something that I'd be I'd be

37:14

happy to talk. We have an upcoming

37:15

development meeting here on Thursday. Um

37:18

and we're going to learn more about um

37:20

the subcontractor base and and the

37:22

people that the third parties that I

37:23

inch wants to work with. So um if I

37:25

could loop in with you, I'd be happy to

37:27

to receive a list of referrals. If you

37:29

have um contractors in mind, we

37:31

definitely um would be open to talking

37:33

to an about that and and seeing, you

37:35

know, how that can work with their with

37:37

their project scope and the workflow. So

37:39

absolutely open to that.

37:41

>> Okay, great. That's um

37:44

one question. One last question I have

37:46

and and this is just for my own

37:48

information.

37:49

>> I'm sorry if I could just add that that

37:51

that we do hope to be able to to GC uh

37:54

projects in the future and have more

37:55

flexibility. That's something that we're

37:57

that we're building up to um and we can

37:59

have a little bit more autonomy over the

38:01

over that process and then that would

38:02

you know empower us even more to to

38:04

consider um uh contractors independent

38:08

from you know GC controller

38:09

consideration. So sorry to interrupt.

38:10

No, no, that's fine. And and the reason

38:12

I bring that up, uh looking for like

38:14

more the the minority and womenowned

38:16

contractors, it it's basically to help

38:18

um improve uh the life of many of our

38:22

citizens. Um, basically when we uh are

38:27

intentional on on hiring these people,

38:29

we're we're getting people that will one

38:31

a be able to to move into your your

38:34

project because they have a a great

38:36

paying job and and then also we're um

38:38

hiring we're we're hiring companies that

38:40

are going to hire people that um other

38:43

companies may not look to hire because

38:45

they they don't understand necessarily

38:47

that person's background or that

38:49

person's um uh lifestyle where you have

38:53

of a more diverse um contractor group,

38:56

you'll you'll get more people that will

38:58

hire uh people that

39:01

uh others may look at and and not think

39:03

that they're uh appropriate for a job.

39:06

So, just keeping a an open mind on on

39:09

that when you do uh work as the general

39:11

contra um as your as your uh as the

39:14

general, that would be that would be

39:15

great. Um and and then the the last

39:18

question that I have is just is there

39:20

any type of environmental mitigation

39:22

that has to come when you're um

39:24

converting uh a funeral home to a a

39:27

residential unit because I'm not certain

39:28

of different chemicals that may be

39:30

present in in the process. Yeah, that

39:33

was a big um when we were assessing the

39:36

site and and and working with the the

39:38

seller and the funeral, that was a big

39:39

question that that I had and and he's

39:41

going through

39:43

um the appropriate process with I'm not

39:46

ex, you know, totally familiar with the

39:47

regulatory bodies that would supervise

39:49

the the dissolution of the of the

39:51

funeral home. Um and that's actually

39:52

part of the

39:54

>> the um the sale and the escrow and that

39:56

what the Mr. Bitner the seller that he's

39:59

going through and we're giving him time

40:00

to to do that appropriately. So that's

40:03

that's his um under his control and his

40:06

objective and and we you know we've

40:08

talked to him about that a lot just from

40:10

the standpoint that we allow a window

40:11

for that to happen appropriately. So

40:13

that's um but in terms of um the

40:16

building itself and the conversion

40:19

>> um you know we have already mapped the

40:21

sewer system. Um we've had a laser scan

40:24

of the building. Um we've had our

40:25

subcontractors in and to assess any

40:28

environmental hazards in terms of like

40:29

the disturbance of you know um demoing

40:32

the building and the existing layout as

40:35

part of the conversion. So that's

40:36

something that that that we have our eye

40:37

on and there's been prior renovations to

40:40

the building. So we think that it's it's

40:42

in it's in great shape to to be to be

40:45

converted again, I would say. And um

40:47

we're we're satisfied, you know, from a

40:49

safety standpoint.

40:51

>> Okay, great. Thank you very much. That's

40:53

everything that I have as as far as a

40:55

question. I'm going to just go to my

40:58

immediate left here and um Councilwoman

41:01

Green, do you have any questions?

41:02

>> Thank you very much. Thank you,

41:04

gentlemen, for being here tonight. Uh I

41:05

think it was a pretty thorough

41:06

presentation, so I don't have any

41:07

questions. Thank you,

41:11

>> Vice President Jones. Any questions?

41:13

>> Yes. Thank you. Thank you, uh for being

41:15

here and your presentation and being

41:17

willing to do a project in our beautiful

41:19

city of Harrisburg.

41:21

>> Many more to come. Yeah. Uh, I'll just

41:24

reiterate what, uh, Councilman Ross, I

41:26

mean, Lawson has said. Um, for me, I

41:28

won't go into too many things, but I'll

41:30

just ask two questions. And something

41:32

that I'm very passionate about is is

41:34

ensuring that, um, local people in the

41:37

city of Harrisburg, I won't use

41:38

diversity, equity, and inclusion. I'll

41:41

just say, you know, contractors here in

41:43

the city of Harrisburg have an

41:45

opportunity. And I know this is a small

41:47

project, so I'm not looking to get 50%.

41:51

You know, this is just a ask. It's not a

41:53

requirement. It's a ask. Um, this is

41:55

just something that I'm very passionate

41:57

about ensuring that, uh, the locals have

41:59

an opportunity to be included in the

42:01

economic growth of our city. Um, how

42:04

many jobs you think will this create?

42:06

>> I think, uh, 15. um in terms of the

42:10

primarily just via the the um the

42:14

subcontractor

42:15

uh skilled labor base.

42:18

>> Okay.

42:18

>> Um and I also that um we we do have um

42:22

projects that that are coming up too

42:24

that like I said that so when I say that

42:26

you know we we venture to to to GC that

42:28

we we do have projects coming up that

42:30

we're going to have uh specifically that

42:32

we have site control that are you know

42:34

very likely to happen. Um, so I I would

42:36

hope that this could be a, you know,

42:37

continued conversation about absolutely

42:39

who we employ and and how thoughtful

42:41

that process is. So,

42:43

>> well, absolutely. I'm just speaking for

42:44

uh the residents again, um, being my my

42:47

uh my lifetime here in the city, you

42:49

know, I've witnessed a lot of uh

42:51

construction and development happening

42:53

where um, a lot of us were cut out and

42:56

um, I'm just being that voice. Second

42:58

thing, um, safety wise, I see in here

43:00

that you guys won't be changing any of

43:01

the lighting. How efficient is that

43:03

lighting in that area to make to ensure

43:05

that the residents in that uh area can

43:08

have some some good lighting? I see some

43:10

of the historical things that you may

43:12

have to go through, but do you believe

43:14

the lighting is efficient in that area?

43:16

>> Um we're we're continuing to assess. I

43:18

think that that we want it to be a um a

43:22

much improved site in general. Um, and

43:24

we're we're still working um with some

43:27

of our subcontractors to figure out with

43:29

the facade and like what what the best

43:31

way for the building to present uh you

43:33

know as safe uh and attractive for the

43:36

community. So I don't I don't have a

43:37

specific answer right now other than to

43:39

say that it's for me personally it's

43:41

something that I'm I'm very focused on

43:43

even from a from a marketing standpoint

43:45

you know just uh in terms of the

43:47

profitability of the project that you

43:48

know we want um the site to be

43:51

transformed. Yeah. And we want people to

43:53

feel, you know, we want people to feel

43:54

good uh and safe about where they live

43:56

and we want the neighbors to feel good

43:58

and and and safe about what is is put in

44:00

their community or how buildings are

44:02

changed in their community. So whether

44:04

you know uh lighting um to the degree

44:06

that that we're allowed to um and then

44:10

uh safety in terms of safe access to the

44:12

building. Um

44:14

>> yeah, I see you have maybe three

44:15

different interestes to this property.

44:18

>> Yep. So, that's something that we're,

44:20

you know, we're working on with our

44:21

subcontractors and that we're at a

44:23

really critical point right now. We're

44:24

going to get a lot more detail here in

44:26

our in our coming meetings, but it's

44:27

it's a focus of mine. I can say that.

44:29

>> I appreciate it and I hope we can get an

44:30

update on that on those safety measures.

44:32

So, that would be great. And that's all

44:34

my questions. Thank you.

44:37

>> All right. And, uh, President Hill,

44:40

>> thank you. Good evening. My questions

44:43

are around affordability.

44:45

So, I wanted to know if uh this project

44:49

will be participating in the affordable

44:53

housing 20% relief.

44:56

>> Uh it will not. Um but when I when I

44:59

came before about 3:15 North Second I

45:01

think we we heard that feedback and and

45:04

we did um rework our you know our

45:07

performing our project and we were

45:09

working with the affordable housing

45:10

trust fund to try to take two of those

45:12

units um of the 10 and and make them

45:14

affordable. So we're it's something that

45:16

we're working on. Um we have other

45:19

actually our next two projects that we

45:21

hope to complete are going to be 100%

45:22

affordable um 28 units total um as

45:26

proposed right now. So, it's something

45:27

that we're, you know, going back to a

45:30

prior project to try to institute um and

45:32

that in our future projects that um when

45:36

and you know, we look at a lot of

45:37

different things, but these are very

45:38

present and future projects that that

45:40

are going to be 100% affordable. So, for

45:42

this one, it is not going to be, but

45:44

that we it's something that we're

45:47

passionate about and focused on and that

45:49

we're putting a lot of resources into

45:50

now and I think um over the next year

45:53

and a half that we're going to be able

45:54

to add a lot of affordable housing to

45:55

the and these are all projects in the

45:57

city. So,

45:58

>> Okay, great. Um for this project, it

46:01

would have only been approximately three

46:03

of the 13 units, but I'm glad to hear

46:06

that you are revisiting with the other

46:09

project. Um, it's just it's something

46:13

that I'm passionate about because it's

46:16

great to have um

46:20

rehabbed

46:22

um properties or even new units

46:27

available to our residents, but if

46:29

nobody can afford them, they're going to

46:31

remain vacant, right? Um, so I think I'm

46:35

glad to hear that you heard what I said

46:38

and that I'm going to continue to ask

46:40

because it's important, right? Um, one

46:44

developer once said, "Oh, it's going to

46:45

be a beautiful building." I'm like,

46:47

"That's nice. It's going to be beautiful

46:48

and empty because nobody can afford it."

46:51

So I just want to ensure that um I guess

46:55

not this project but your future

46:57

projects you are um taking the city

47:01

proper median income into consideration.

47:05

>> Yes.

47:05

>> I don't have any other questions. Thank

47:07

you.

47:09

>> Thank you. Um Councilwoman Ross.

47:11

>> Thank you very much um Councilman um

47:15

Lawson.

47:17

Um I just just to piggyback off of um

47:20

President Hill, I was wondering um if

47:23

there not going to be any affordable

47:25

apartments, how much are how much is the

47:28

rent going to be uh for the apartments?

47:30

I think it's one bedroom and two

47:32

bedrooms.

47:33

>> Yes. Yes. Um the the rents range from uh

47:37

1,000 per month to 1,800 per month and

47:41

the average is uh just over 13.

47:45

>> Okay. So, the 10,000 would be for the

47:47

one bedroom and

47:48

>> that's for a studio actually.

47:49

>> Oh, that's a studio. Okay.

47:52

>> Oh, wow.

47:54

Okay. Um, and then I just had a couple

47:57

more questions. Um, one of my questions

48:00

and it it actually wasn't until you were

48:03

speaking about that there were

48:05

apartments currently in the funeral home

48:07

and then you're converting um the bottom

48:09

level into I think eight more

48:11

apartments. There's five at the top. So,

48:13

I was thinking, are is there anybody

48:15

living currently in the five apartments

48:17

at the top? And okay. And so, I was just

48:21

thinking about them like, are you going

48:22

to be rehabbing their apartments? If so,

48:25

how are they going to be displaced? And

48:27

if you're not, then how are they going

48:29

to be displaced? If you're while you're

48:30

doing the bottom level. Um, so I guess

48:33

my question is just around like how are

48:35

you working with those residents? And is

48:37

there going to are they going to be

48:38

displaced at all? What kind of

48:40

provisions are you putting in place to

48:41

make sure that they're okay?

48:43

>> We do not have any plans to displace

48:45

those residents. Um

48:48

>> they are in terms of the current

48:49

occupation, I would need to when we went

48:52

under contract, it was uh 100% occupied.

48:56

So all five of the apartments were

48:57

occupied.

48:58

>> Okay.

48:58

>> Um we do not have any

49:01

>> we would like to from a maintenance

49:03

standpoint, the units are very nice

49:05

right now, but we would like from a

49:06

maintenance standpoint to improve them,

49:07

but we don't have any plans. It's not in

49:09

our budget to totally renovate them and

49:12

give the residents notice. So, our plan

49:13

is is to is to keep the residents in

49:16

place.

49:17

>> Okay. And you're and since you're not

49:18

going to re be redoing their apartments,

49:21

is their rent going to be raised?

49:23

>> The we don't have any plans to to to

49:26

raise rent on those residents right now.

49:27

Um we haven't had any communication with

49:29

the residents. Um I uh you know, and I

49:34

actually need to get more updates on

49:36

exactly the status of the occupancy. Um,

49:39

okay.

49:39

>> And, uh, but as of right now, we just

49:41

want to keep things as they are.

49:43

>> Okay. I mean, I know, um, per se it

49:46

doesn't really have anything to do with

49:49

the a vote on this property. It's not

49:51

part of the land development, but they

49:53

are a concern for me, the residents that

49:55

are in there, and just making sure, you

49:57

know, they're okay. The rent's not going

49:59

to be raised just because you are

50:01

rehabbing the bottom level, but you're

50:03

not going to be re renovating their

50:05

apartments. But if would would you be

50:07

able just to let us know how many um

50:10

residents are currently just living

50:12

there just for our

50:14

>> Yeah, I can get an update from the from

50:16

the seller and then as we kind of get

50:18

closer to our our actual settlement date

50:21

which is related to the construction

50:23

loan closing that I can get exact

50:25

information.

50:26

>> Okay, thank you. I appreciate that. Um

50:28

and then I just had um and just correct

50:30

me if I'm wrong. I just wanted residents

50:32

to know about the parking because

50:34

parking is a huge issue in the city. I

50:36

just wanted to make sure they knew that

50:38

um from the understanding you're going

50:39

to be providing 16 spaces for this um

50:44

multifamily dwelling that which is the

50:46

recommended amount and there could be

50:49

more spaces because there's a I think I

50:52

think uh you said across the street

50:54

there was a possibility or you could use

50:57

extra space. the the second street lot

51:00

actually has 36 spaces. Um and so

51:05

actually the you know separate from the

51:06

16 there's an additional 20

51:08

>> um that will be

51:10

>> um

51:11

>> there for flexibility. Okay. Um and so

51:13

there's that one of the uniqueness

51:16

things about this site is that there's

51:17

plenty of parking. So um and that right

51:20

now that parking will not be leased to

51:23

the public. Um okay because we do not

51:26

have permission to do that. Um,

51:28

>> so from the current resident standpoint,

51:31

um, that there's going to be plenty of

51:33

parking.

51:34

>> Okay. And will the parking be free for

51:35

them and the current residents that are

51:37

living in this dwelling?

51:40

>> Uh, right now for the the current

51:42

residents, it is free and we don't have

51:44

a plan to change that, but for the for

51:46

the new units, we're we're working on

51:48

our proform. There might be a fee for

51:49

parking. Um, and that's part of

51:52

assistance to to finance the project.

51:54

>> Okay. And how much are you looking for

51:56

to possibly charge the new residents of

51:59

the eight newly constructed apartments

52:01

or renovated apartments for parking?

52:04

>> My awareness of um the the rates is that

52:08

we we're either going to put it into

52:11

rent and it'll be part of the rental

52:12

consideration. We need to talk to our

52:13

property management company about where

52:15

that would be, but my awareness of the

52:16

market is between um 50 and and $75 per

52:21

month. Um but we have to, you know, once

52:24

we get um greater clarity on cost, we

52:28

have to decide exactly what we're going

52:29

to do with that. Um but um right now

52:32

it's up in the air. I need more info

52:34

from the property management company

52:35

about what they think would be the best

52:36

thing to do.

52:37

>> Okay. Thank you so much for answering my

52:39

questions. That's all for me.

52:42

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez.

52:44

>> Thank you, Chair Lawson. U Thank you

52:46

both for joining us this evening and

52:47

providing this presentation. I don't

52:49

really have questions, just some

52:51

sentiments for it. Um, I'm appreciative

52:53

that you'll be overhauling the amenities

52:55

for the current residents that are

52:57

there. Um, just to kind of match up if

53:00

there is I I guess if there isn't a

53:02

chance to upgrade, um, how would you go

53:05

about that or you just work like a

53:07

normal maintenance kind of let them

53:09

know, give them a heads up, make the

53:11

corrections, and kind of keep them in

53:12

the apartment?

53:13

>> Yeah, I think we take a lot of pride in

53:15

in in maintenance and our

53:17

responsiveness. Um, so I think that it's

53:19

a little bit of a of a balance to not be

53:21

disturbing, but wanting to improve the

53:23

quality. Um, so I think that our normal

53:26

process would be to reach out to all

53:28

those residents, you know, uh, how has

53:31

maintenance been? Do you have any

53:32

problems? What would you like to see

53:33

improved? You know, what are your plans

53:35

long term, you know, for for residing

53:37

here? And then, um, I think the basis

53:40

would just be super responsive to

53:42

maintenance and immediately take care of

53:44

of any problems, especially as they

53:46

relate to habitability. So, um I think

53:48

it would just be some communication and

53:49

kind of understand, you know, many that

53:52

they may say, "Hey, my unit's great. I

53:54

like my privacy." They may say, "Hey,

53:55

this these issues have been ongoing and

53:57

we need you to take care of them." And

53:58

and we are well resourced to do that and

54:00

we take tremendous pride in, you know,

54:02

all of our properties um that that's the

54:05

case that they're they're well taken

54:06

care of.

54:07

>> Thank you for that. And um I do

54:09

understand there has to be a bottom line

54:10

when you're doing any kind of

54:11

development so you can make the project

54:13

work. But uh 1,300 for a studio and like

54:17

upwards to 1,800 I think you mentioned

54:20

>> thousand for the studio, 13 average.

54:21

Yeah.

54:21

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. That kind of just

54:23

screamed, you know, not so affordable

54:26

for the area. Um and just kind of the

54:28

question of what kind of tenant are we

54:31

looking for? or is it just business

54:32

people coming into the city to work

54:34

downtown, which we definitely need some

54:36

more life pumped into the Midtown

54:38

downtown area? But we definitely need

54:40

some affordability for maybe, you know,

54:42

single parents or, you know, something

54:44

something afford along the lines of

54:46

that. So, that just kind of screams out

54:47

to me right away. Um, but I do

54:49

understand there's, you know, a bottom

54:51

line that you have to, you know, even to

54:52

make the project work, something has to,

54:54

you know, give weight. But I am

54:55

appreciative of uh the consideration of

54:58

your previous you know developments and

55:00

going into the affordability with those

55:02

units and I just look forward to future

55:04

developments and how we can make that

55:05

work for the families in the area. But

55:08

um the current parking lot you did

55:10

mention you would retain that as well

55:12

though, right? Um the the one that's

55:14

connected to the Okay.

55:16

>> Yes, that's part of the

55:17

>> And just for my own curiosity, is there

55:19

a crematory like in the building right

55:21

now like in the facility? Uh yes,

55:24

>> there is.

55:25

>> There is.

55:26

>> Yeah, I believe there's Well, I'm not

55:29

totally I don't I don't believe so

55:31

actually. I don't think that there is

55:34

cremation proceedings.

55:36

>> That's what I was I was curious about

55:37

that.

55:38

>> No, I don't I don't I don't think so. I

55:39

have not I have not seen that. It has

55:41

not been disclosed and I think that

55:44

their process is is different from that

55:47

on that on that site.

55:48

>> I didn't want to be on Ghost Hunters or

55:50

anything.

55:50

>> Yeah. No, this is Yeah, this is

55:53

>> But people are going to be living here

55:55

now.

55:55

>> Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And what I just

55:57

was curious because I know sometimes a

55:58

lot of fuel lines would have to be

56:00

connected to those furnaces. So that

56:02

could just be a lot of more work on your

56:04

end, but I was just curious more than

56:05

anything. It's not very frequent we get

56:08

these kind of developments, you know, um

56:10

restructuring old, you know, uh morg or

56:12

funeral home or crematory. So I I am

56:15

appreciative for you gentlemen being

56:16

here this evening. And that's all I

56:18

have. Thank you.

56:18

>> Thank you. Yep. Thank you. And then

56:21

Councilwoman Davis.

56:22

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. Good

56:24

evening, Mr. Knight and Mr. White. Um,

56:27

most of my questions were answered, but

56:29

I still have a few, well, two and then

56:33

one statement. What drives what what is

56:37

driving you to consider uh your next

56:40

project of 28 units and all of those to

56:43

be affordable?

56:46

>> Two separate projects um for 14 each.

56:49

Um,

56:50

I think it's really important. Um, you

56:53

know, I, uh, I didn't grow up directly

56:55

in the city of Harrisburg, but I spent

56:57

my entire life in, in the area. Um, and,

57:00

uh, I think that I'm very interested in

57:04

in learning um, and and participating in

57:07

more opportunities for affordable

57:08

housing. I think that they're and I just

57:11

look as a company, we want to be

57:12

balanced. You know, if we're going to do

57:14

market rate projects, I want to do

57:15

affordable projects, too. So we have

57:17

>> um you know two market rate projects

57:19

that you've heard about. We've gone back

57:21

and and made an adjustment to one and

57:22

then we have two affordable projects um

57:24

coming up. And then part of that was

57:25

actually just a process of you know

57:27

we've you know been educated by uh other

57:30

people on um you know what the

57:32

opportunities could be for the city um

57:35

and for us. So now

57:36

>> that's why you know the next couple you

57:38

know we're we're working hard for

57:39

affordable projects. So, it's balance.

57:41

Um, it's a it's a love for the for the

57:44

city of Harrisburg and and and wanting

57:46

there to be, I would say, a beautiful

57:48

building that is also affordable,

57:50

wanting to do great structures that are

57:52

accessible to a broader part of the

57:55

population in the market. And then from

57:57

a just wanting to be balanced and and

58:00

and help all the city's residents as

58:02

opposed to like a target population that

58:04

can afford rent that that might not be

58:07

accessible to to others.

58:09

>> Thank you. I appreciate that. And are

58:12

any of your units um developed for or

58:16

will they be developed for uh handicap

58:19

persons?

58:20

>> Well, on 1332, one of the interesting

58:25

things about the building is it has many

58:27

ground level access points. So, the

58:30

entire all of the units um and

58:35

the I think per code actually there's

58:38

going to be accessibility all the way

58:40

around the building just because of the

58:42

nature of the the units being on the

58:43

ground floor. So,

58:45

>> right.

58:45

>> So, I would say that a big part of, you

58:47

know, the the work around the building

58:48

is making sure that we have the

58:50

appropriate ramps and access all all

58:52

across the building and that's a big

58:54

part of what we're working on right now.

58:55

So, for 1332 and then

58:58

>> um for 315, yes, um too, we do have um

59:02

accessible units and then for our

59:05

upcoming projects um they're going to be

59:07

a little bit more challenging. um 2100

59:10

North Third, it's going to be a little

59:11

bit more challenging just because of the

59:12

historical nature of the building and

59:14

we're going to have to create that

59:15

access. Um but yeah, the general answer

59:18

would be yes. And sometimes it's

59:19

dependent on the site and the project

59:21

and we take advantage of that when we

59:22

can and sometimes we need to work to to

59:24

make sure that's the case.

59:26

>> And some of the other handicap features

59:29

would include like the bars in the

59:32

bathrooms to help persons too

59:34

>> that are handicapped.

59:36

>> Yep. I think openings, thresholds,

59:38

>> right?

59:38

>> Um access to the building and then um I

59:41

would just say in general just from

59:44

humanto human standpoint that um

59:46

>> we are open to we want to make units

59:50

available to everybody from the leasing

59:52

st you know standpoint and if somebody

59:53

came to me that needed accommodations um

59:56

like you know um accessibility bars and

59:58

bathrooms that I would be happy to to to

1:00:01

accommodate that. Um so thank you for

1:00:04

asking.

1:00:04

>> Thank you. And then

1:00:07

would you send out a letter to the

1:00:10

residents in the neighborhood um making

1:00:12

them aware that there's going to be

1:00:14

construction and maybe heavy equipment

1:00:17

there. Um, often times, uh, companies

1:00:21

come into the neighborhoods and they may

1:00:23

start working at 7:00 in the morning,

1:00:26

8:00 in the morning, and they're making

1:00:29

all this noise and nobody in the

1:00:31

neighborhood is aware that this uh, I

1:00:34

just think it's a, you know, nice uh,

1:00:36

touch and shows the respect for the

1:00:39

community as well as your tenants on the

1:00:42

second floor in that property.

1:00:44

>> Yeah. What? Absolutely. Um, and I know

1:00:45

that there's already been notice as part

1:00:47

of the standard process for our our

1:00:49

zoning hearing and and planning

1:00:50

commission. So, we we have had public

1:00:52

circulation of the, you know, of the

1:00:54

project approval process. And then I

1:00:55

think given the gap in time that it

1:00:58

would be appropriate to give an

1:00:59

additional notice when we have a a firm

1:01:01

construction day so everybody's aware.

1:01:02

That's

1:01:03

>> Thank you, Mr. White. That's it for me,

1:01:05

Mr. Councilman Lawson.

1:01:08

>> Thank you. And then, uh, Vice President

1:01:10

Jones said he had a follow-up. Yeah,

1:01:12

just one quick question um that I meant

1:01:14

to ask you. Uh far as the do you have an

1:01:17

estimate of what kind of taxes this

1:01:20

project would bring into the city

1:01:23

>> um

1:01:26

in terms of uh property tax revenue?

1:01:28

>> Yes, sir. Um I apologize. Yes.

1:01:30

>> Is it uh

1:01:34

>> just off the top of my head? I mean the

1:01:36

current um assessment um is around

1:01:40

20,000 uh a year and then

1:01:43

>> the improved at the common level ratio

1:01:46

there would be uh a significant increase

1:01:48

but I wouldn't know exactly until the

1:01:50

the the appraisal and I work with we

1:01:52

work with Van Allen and they're really

1:01:54

helpful on the tax side. So I don't know

1:01:56

exactly but there's definitely going to

1:01:57

be a massive improvement um you know to

1:02:00

the building and um

1:02:02

>> so you have to reassess.

1:02:04

>> Yeah, but we might I want to be that

1:02:06

that we might also pursue abatement

1:02:08

though too. So long term um it's going

1:02:11

to be a much improved building that is

1:02:13

much more valuable and um has a much

1:02:17

higher assessed value.

1:02:19

>> And so when you're looking at abatement

1:02:20

what what time I mean like five 10

1:02:23

>> there's a I think for it was just it was

1:02:25

just um or it's in the process of being

1:02:27

approved or it was just approved again

1:02:29

for 2026 and this would be the the 100%

1:02:32

residential tenure.

1:02:34

>> Okay. Thank you. No further questions.

1:02:37

>> Thank you. And then I had just one

1:02:39

followup just because there were a

1:02:41

question about the uh the rent range. Uh

1:02:43

what is the the unit mix as as far as

1:02:46

like types of bedrooms? Uh what are we

1:02:49

looking at there?

1:02:50

>> Uh primarily one-bedroom units, uh a

1:02:53

two-bedroom unit, and a studio. in terms

1:02:55

of the units created and then the

1:02:57

existing I think that there's there's

1:02:58

two threes

1:03:00

uh two twos and a one or a two and two

1:03:04

once I haven't really we don't um just

1:03:06

with respect to the residents and like

1:03:08

the current owner we haven't had the

1:03:09

most access to the to the occupied units

1:03:11

because that's disturbing and so um but

1:03:14

that's my that some of those units are

1:03:15

actually bigger

1:03:17

>> great thank you very much

1:03:19

um council would anyone have any

1:03:22

follow-up questions

1:03:24

>> not a follow-up question. Just want to

1:03:25

say within the perimeter of that

1:03:27

facility, of course you have Morris

1:03:29

laundry mat, you have Stillies, you have

1:03:31

the Grilled and Juice Bar. So just that

1:03:34

development alone or rejuvenate just

1:03:36

that small corridor right there, Second

1:03:37

Street. So you know, we get into the

1:03:39

habit of creating more developments like

1:03:40

this, we could really pump some more

1:03:42

life into Harrisburg. So

1:03:43

>> yeah, we're very we're very excited. I

1:03:45

appreciate you mentioning that. It's a

1:03:46

really cool corridor and part of the

1:03:47

city and we're hoping to contribute to

1:03:49

that.

1:03:49

>> Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you, Chair

1:03:51

Lawson.

1:03:53

>> Thank you. Thank you gentlemen very

1:03:54

much. Um I would uh like to uh move uh

1:03:59

resol resolution 4 2026 to our next uh

1:04:03

legislative um session. And I'm going to

1:04:07

uh encourage my uh fellow council

1:04:10

members to support this as we do need uh

1:04:13

more development in our in our in our

1:04:16

city and bringing it to that area would

1:04:18

be a great asset to the city. So,

1:04:22

thank you very much.

1:04:23

>> Thank you.

1:04:30

>> And I believe Mr. Knight, you're going

1:04:32

to stay right where you're at. Um,

1:04:34

Mr. Humphre, could you read please uh

1:04:36

resolution 52026 into the record?

1:04:40

>> Yes. Resolution 5 of 2026, a resolution

1:04:44

approving the preliminary/final land

1:04:46

development plan for 2601 North 3rd

1:04:49

Street, building 1, submitted by Gregory

1:04:52

Hawquist of Penmark Harrisburg Holdings

1:04:54

LLC to convert the vacant hospital

1:04:56

building into a mixeduse building and

1:04:58

associated site and access improvements.

1:05:02

>> Thank you. And once again, we have Mr.

1:05:04

Knight. And this time, I'll remember to

1:05:06

ask um who are you sitting with?

1:05:09

>> Sorry. Go ahead. council.

1:05:12

Uh my name is Greg Hulquist and I'm with

1:05:15

Penmark.

1:05:16

>> Okay. Thank you very much, Mr. Hulquist.

1:05:18

And uh it looks as if we have a uh

1:05:20

presentation if you could please.

1:05:22

>> Yeah, I'll do a little introduction and

1:05:23

I'll hand it off to Mr. Hawquist to go

1:05:26

through the PowerPoint. Um uh so as

1:05:28

Cedric noted, uh this uh proposal is

1:05:32

actually the um second phase of the uh

1:05:35

poly clinic hospital campus

1:05:37

revitalization.

1:05:38

um council may remember I think last

1:05:40

year uh reviewing uh building number

1:05:42

three which is phase one uh which is at

1:05:44

the northern end of this site um and was

1:05:47

the former nurses quarters uh so that

1:05:49

was a bit more of a I think easy

1:05:50

conversion to apartments this is going

1:05:52

to be a conversion of the main hospital

1:05:54

building uh at the southern end of the

1:05:56

site uh so much bigger um institutional

1:05:59

space um so uh the proposal is um

1:06:03

significantly different in terms of both

1:06:05

the number of units and the types of

1:06:07

uses that will on site. Um they're

1:06:10

proposing to convert the vacant hospital

1:06:11

into a mixeduse building featuring 130

1:06:13

residential units, associated amenity

1:06:15

space for tenants and both space

1:06:18

reserved for retail store uses and space

1:06:20

set aside for future development

1:06:22

proposals. Um so that will allow the

1:06:24

project to I think evolve over time um

1:06:27

as uh some of these units come on board

1:06:29

and as I think they probably further

1:06:31

their engagement with the neighborhood

1:06:32

uh the surrounding neighborhood. They've

1:06:34

been um h having a lot of meetings as

1:06:36

you may recall from the first phase of

1:06:37

this project. Uh the project proposes

1:06:40

units in a variety of configurations and

1:06:42

sizes from studios to three-bedroom

1:06:44

apartments and from 544 ft to 1144 or

1:06:48

sorry 1143 ft. Um again this is uh the

1:06:53

second phase here. Uh the um applicants

1:06:56

have a uh significant amount of parking

1:06:59

associated with that. You can see in the

1:07:00

upper right hand corner of that uh uh of

1:07:03

the um PowerPoint slide there, the

1:07:05

parking garage. I think it's somewhere

1:07:06

in the neighborhood of like 400 parking

1:07:08

spaces, 440 parking spaces in that

1:07:10

garage. And then there's also a

1:07:11

significant amount of on-site surface

1:07:14

parking um to the west of the main

1:07:16

buildings there. Um and uh as noted, uh

1:07:20

there will be it's going to be a

1:07:21

mixeduse building, so there is space um

1:07:23

along the fourth street frontage for um

1:07:25

some outward facing commercial uses and

1:07:28

then some kind of flex space for the

1:07:30

future on all of the floors. Uh so that

1:07:33

would be I think a really unique aspect

1:07:35

of having some sort of a commercial or

1:07:37

community focused space on upper floor.

1:07:39

So it's not necessarily just entrance

1:07:41

right in at the ground level. Um but uh

1:07:44

overall, you know, this uh is a very

1:07:47

unique and challenging um footprint of a

1:07:50

building and floor plan of a building.

1:07:52

Uh so we're excited to have somebody uh

1:07:55

that is um on site and uh working

1:07:58

through the process to hopefully bring

1:08:00

this property uh back into productive

1:08:03

use for the city. Both contributing to

1:08:05

uh the tax base as we've heard before

1:08:07

here and then also providing um new

1:08:10

housing units for um potentially current

1:08:13

residents of the neighborhood as well as

1:08:14

future residents. and then some um

1:08:17

neighborhood focused um commercial and

1:08:20

community uh amenity space. Uh with that

1:08:22

all being said, uh the planning

1:08:24

commission recommend that city council

1:08:27

approved the request with the following

1:08:28

conditions. Uh the applicant must

1:08:30

reconstruct portions of the fourth

1:08:32

street sidewalk to be ADA compliant and

1:08:34

specifically the loading dock in the

1:08:36

middle of the block. Uh the bureau

1:08:37

recommends that other points with

1:08:38

vehicular crossings utilize driveway

1:08:40

designs with consistent raised safe

1:08:43

raised sidewalks across them for safer

1:08:46

uh vehicular pedestrian conflict points.

1:08:48

And uh that first point was if you uh

1:08:51

are familiar with the process, there's

1:08:52

like uh two loading docks off of Fourth

1:08:54

Street that trucks would back into right

1:08:56

off the street. So it kind of cuts up

1:08:57

the sidewalk right there. So, we're just

1:08:59

recommending that that be, you know,

1:09:00

reconstructed and hopefully to have a a

1:09:03

raised crosswalk design across some of

1:09:05

the two vehicular access points um into

1:09:08

the site on Fourth Street. Uh the

1:09:11

applicant must coordinate with the

1:09:12

Department of Public Works regarding the

1:09:13

size, location, and screening of any

1:09:15

required refuge containers. Uh the

1:09:16

planning bureau recommends the applicant

1:09:18

consider eventually consolidating all

1:09:20

refuge storage and access in the

1:09:22

existing vehicular access areas along

1:09:24

the Fourth Street frontage. And again,

1:09:26

there are two kind of little pocket um

1:09:28

parking areas, loading areas off of

1:09:30

Fourth Street uh for the former hospital

1:09:33

there um that would perhaps make a good

1:09:36

location for uh trash trucks to be able

1:09:38

to get into and also to keep uh the

1:09:41

refues uh off of the public rightway uh

1:09:43

frontage. Um the applicant must ensure

1:09:46

that any proposed signage for the

1:09:47

businesses on site is in conformance

1:09:48

with the applicable regulations or they

1:09:50

must secure the necessary zoning relief.

1:09:52

And finally, the planning bureau

1:09:54

recommends that sheltered bike parking

1:09:55

be provided at the main entrances to

1:09:57

both the residential and commercial

1:09:58

components of the property with secured

1:10:00

bike storage potentially located in one

1:10:02

of the proposed amenity areas on the

1:10:04

first floor as shown in the floor plans.

1:10:07

Uh planning commission recommends that

1:10:08

Harrisburg City Council approve the

1:10:10

request for the following reasons. The

1:10:13

adaptive reuse of a large vacant and

1:10:15

underutilized institutional building

1:10:16

into a mixeduse building with lower

1:10:18

level retail store spaces and apartments

1:10:20

above represents a unique and

1:10:22

challenging project in the city and will

1:10:24

support redevelopment of the remaining

1:10:25

buildings that comprise the former

1:10:27

hospital campus. Additionally, the

1:10:28

applicant is retaining flexibility in

1:10:30

the project by reserving portions of the

1:10:31

building for future development

1:10:32

proposals which will help the project

1:10:34

grow more organically to support the

1:10:36

needs of existing residents of the

1:10:37

neighborhood and future residents of the

1:10:39

development. A successful redevelopment

1:10:41

of this institutional site may help

1:10:43

catalyze redevelopment and reactivation

1:10:45

of other institutional sites to the

1:10:46

north, including the former William Penn

1:10:48

High School and the Zebo Shrine. Other

1:10:51

conversions of former commercial or

1:10:52

institutional buildings elsewhere in the

1:10:53

city have generally de demonstrated such

1:10:55

projects do not adversely impact the

1:10:57

neighborhoods in which they are located

1:10:58

and often help generate other

1:11:00

improvements in the in those

1:11:01

communities. And finally, the proposed

1:11:04

redevelopment will add new residents to

1:11:05

the neighborhood to activate the street

1:11:07

on nights and weekends and grow customer

1:11:09

base to support local businesses while

1:11:11

providing a new neighborhood focused

1:11:13

space and will provide additional units

1:11:14

to the uptown housing inventory.

1:11:27

>> Mr. Hus, please.

1:11:29

>> So, I put a little presentation

1:11:30

together. to see everybody again. Uh,

1:11:33

council,

1:11:35

um, is it okay if I give a quick update

1:11:36

on building three, what you guys

1:11:39

approved in November, just to sort of

1:11:40

update you on what's happening?

1:11:42

>> Um, next slide, please.

1:11:44

>> So, this is an overall progress schedule

1:11:46

of building three. Um,

1:11:50

yeah, it started out with city council

1:11:52

approving the zoning. We went in for

1:11:54

land development approval.

1:11:56

Uh, we submitted that in August, so you

1:11:58

all approved it. I think it was July 7th

1:12:01

and then we submitted on August 1st. We

1:12:03

went in front of uh planning commission

1:12:05

on 93

1:12:07

and they recommended it for approval and

1:12:09

then we uh went in front of you on 113

1:12:12

and then 1110 you voted it into

1:12:15

into action there and so we from that

1:12:19

point we went into detail design.

1:12:22

The detailed design is basically at the

1:12:24

point now of going out for bid. Um the

1:12:27

reason I highlight that uh is about the

1:12:29

questions around minority participation,

1:12:32

you know, which is something I'm sorry

1:12:34

I'm a little sick. So, uh something that

1:12:36

I um talked about every time I've been

1:12:40

in front of council is something that's

1:12:41

important to us. And um so

1:12:46

hopefully all those the subcontractors

1:12:48

will be seeing those drawings. Uh we got

1:12:52

our demo permit on 9:30 and we started

1:12:54

demolition as soon as council approved

1:12:58

in November. Um we started demolition

1:13:02

and we actually had to stop because we

1:13:04

ran into some structural questions. This

1:13:06

is an old building. It's 100-y old

1:13:08

building or at least portions of it are.

1:13:11

It's um actually was built over four

1:13:14

different time periods. So all these

1:13:18

different structures and questions came

1:13:20

up. So, we had to stop, pause, get

1:13:24

questions answered, and then we're back

1:13:26

under construction again with the

1:13:27

demolition.

1:13:29

And our construction will really get

1:13:30

started in earnest as soon as that demo

1:13:32

is far enough along. We did get our

1:13:34

building permit. Um,

1:13:37

I guess uh yeah, January 13th. So, we're

1:13:41

ready to start and we'll steam ahead as

1:13:44

soon as our demo is far enough along.

1:13:45

Next slide, please.

1:13:49

I wanted to give a quick update on the

1:13:52

um historic tax credit process. It is

1:13:54

very involved and

1:13:57

um it's important that I talk about it

1:13:59

because we have told the neighbors and

1:14:03

told council that we're going to

1:14:04

preserve the building and I just thought

1:14:06

it would be important to let you guys

1:14:08

know where we are with that. Next slide.

1:14:14

So this is kind of the layout of the

1:14:16

overall program. When you submit for

1:14:18

historic tax credits, you have to go in

1:14:20

with the whole campus all at one shot.

1:14:24

So that's building three, building one,

1:14:25

and building two. Our main focus right

1:14:28

now is building three, but we are

1:14:30

working on the tax credits for buildings

1:14:33

three and building one at the same time.

1:14:36

I circled that building three because

1:14:38

the next slide,

1:14:40

uh, please, next slide.

1:14:43

This is the the schedule for building

1:14:46

three only. And every one of those lines

1:14:48

is a lot of work. So we have a

1:14:50

fourperson team working about halfime

1:14:54

for the last five or six months on

1:14:56

getting the historic tax credit. So it's

1:14:58

just sort of a no one can read any of

1:15:01

that I know but uh

1:15:07

next slide please. Uh a little uh sense

1:15:11

of the progress. We are very fortunate

1:15:13

to have an excellent uh demolition

1:15:16

contractor

1:15:17

who's really doing a great job and um

1:15:20

this is kind of some before uh we really

1:15:23

started on the first first the fourth

1:15:25

floor, excuse me. Uh and are working our

1:15:29

way down. And next slide. And this is

1:15:32

what that looks like after about four

1:15:35

weeks. I mean the I want to say the

1:15:38

hardest part of the fourth floor looks

1:15:40

like this. and you could eat your dinner

1:15:44

off the floor. I mean, it's insane how

1:15:47

clean and and thorough and good a job

1:15:49

that's a local contractor.

1:15:51

There are ample

1:15:54

folks here. We just have to find them.

1:15:56

And um this is an example of that. So,

1:16:00

next slide.

1:16:03

We talked a little bit about

1:16:05

um the last time we got in front of you

1:16:08

guys about site logistics and that was

1:16:10

important and we it is locked down just

1:16:14

like this. Hopefully if any of you have

1:16:16

driven by you see that we really try to

1:16:18

make sure that the site is tight

1:16:21

um that there's not loose anything

1:16:24

anywhere. It's like we've got a really

1:16:25

good construction manager, a really good

1:16:27

demolition contractor,

1:16:29

and we're doing our best to follow the

1:16:31

the rules. We have a couple more um

1:16:35

meetings with the neighbors coming up.

1:16:37

Um those are going to go on the city

1:16:39

website out of the gate this time

1:16:42

instead of the last time. We found out

1:16:43

the hard way that we were getting a poor

1:16:46

showing because we weren't advertising

1:16:48

it the right way. And uh so we'll just

1:16:50

do that right out of the gate. This will

1:16:52

be our sixth and seventh

1:16:55

u meeting with the neighbors and we'll

1:16:56

give them an update uh as well and talk

1:16:59

about building one because right now all

1:17:02

eyes are on building three but building

1:17:04

one's more the same. So we want to make

1:17:06

sure everybody's

1:17:08

u connected with what's going on.

1:17:11

Building one would follow building three

1:17:13

by about two or three months. Three

1:17:15

months say

1:17:16

u so it had to do with financing why we

1:17:20

split it up that way.

1:17:22

couldn't go to a bank and have them

1:17:23

finance 230 units all at one shot.

1:17:28

Um, next slide.

1:17:30

Um, so a little bit uh more about uh

1:17:34

building one which is phase two. So land

1:17:36

development on building three is done.

1:17:39

This is about building one. Next slide.

1:17:44

Uh this is where it sits on the site. I

1:17:46

think most folks are aware of it. You

1:17:47

all have seen I think all of this

1:17:49

before.

1:17:51

um in the zoning uh the resoning

1:17:54

application and again with the land

1:17:56

development application that we just

1:17:57

submitted

1:17:59

and these are just some 3D views of it's

1:18:02

all in a model so I asked the architect

1:18:05

you know sent me some pretty pictures

1:18:07

whatever and that's what he sent me so

1:18:10

next slide

1:18:14

um so this is an aerial from the fourth

1:18:16

street side and the uh reason I wanted

1:18:19

to show that is one. It kind of shows

1:18:21

the mass of this. I get lost every time

1:18:24

I go in this building. It's five

1:18:26

stories, including the lowest level.

1:18:28

It's 205,000 square feet roughly.

1:18:32

We can't use all the square footage with

1:18:35

the zoning uh limit that we have with

1:18:39

230 units. This campus really could

1:18:41

support more like 300 units. Um

1:18:45

we just we can't use it all. Um, next

1:18:50

slide.

1:18:52

And the these are some street views. Um,

1:18:55

the main entrance, that's the

1:18:56

picturesque entrance that everybody

1:18:58

sees, but honestly, the street views on

1:19:01

the right and on the bottom is really

1:19:03

what everybody sees. And that's the old

1:19:06

on the right is the old emergency um

1:19:09

entrance,

1:19:11

which lends itself to a grocery store.

1:19:15

Um,

1:19:16

pardon me.

1:19:20

So, we are talking to someone right now.

1:19:22

It's not Whole Foods.

1:19:26

It's a local

1:19:28

It's a local uh merchant who has two

1:19:31

facilities in the city now. And this

1:19:34

would be about 6,000 square feet. We We

1:19:38

could do like 10 or 12, honestly. And

1:19:41

for a

1:19:42

medium-sized grocery store, you want

1:19:46

like 10 to 12. Uh,

1:19:50

but they want about six. And we think it

1:19:53

would be great uh to be able to have a

1:19:56

local

1:19:58

merchant, you know, provide that kind of

1:20:00

resource for the neighbors. Uh, we will

1:20:03

make no money here. We know that. It's

1:20:05

not for that. It's really to try to

1:20:08

though

1:20:10

we're going to try to work something out

1:20:12

with them. Hopefully we can. Um they

1:20:15

were going to be here tonight but their

1:20:17

daughter is sick. So um so that's

1:20:21

you know a use there. That would be

1:20:23

great. And that's on that corner on the

1:20:25

bottom. But what you see when you go

1:20:28

down four street and I know it's quiet

1:20:29

and we've heard the neighbors loud and

1:20:31

clear. We understand their concerns. We

1:20:33

think now not like we live there and we

1:20:35

don't proclaim to act like we know

1:20:39

exactly but I've had developments come

1:20:41

in my neighborhood and where I lived in

1:20:43

outside of Philadelphia and I'd like to

1:20:46

think I understand that

1:20:49

uh we need to listen to them. But right

1:20:51

now it's a blight like it's an eyesore

1:20:54

and it's getting worse. And one of the

1:20:57

nice things about the historic tax

1:20:58

credits is it gives us some funding to

1:21:00

clean the brick up. Um, and that's a lot

1:21:04

of brick in that building.

1:21:06

Hundreds of thousands of square feet of

1:21:08

brick. It's crazy.

1:21:11

But anyway, so next slide.

1:21:14

This is the first floor. It gives you an

1:21:16

idea of the apartment layout. This was

1:21:18

in your should have been in your packet.

1:21:20

You all you all got a packet right from

1:21:23

Yeah. Okay.

1:21:25

Um and you see on the upper right there

1:21:27

that we left

1:21:29

an area um conveniently for future that

1:21:33

was it would be easy to develop later

1:21:37

because it's vertical. So you can

1:21:39

imagine running sanitary stacks with

1:21:41

apartments up on below you. So we we

1:21:44

kind of left a wing.

1:21:47

Right now, our zoning limits us to

1:21:49

really apartments um in terms of use,

1:21:53

but we're capped out in terms of

1:21:55

capacity. So, we're

1:21:57

whatever we do, we're going to have to

1:21:59

go in for zoning relief

1:22:02

um and get approval and go through

1:22:03

zoning hearing board and go through

1:22:05

planning, go through city council. And

1:22:07

obviously, that's a very heavy neighbor

1:22:11

community concern. So, we'll have to do

1:22:14

our homework and make sure we get the

1:22:16

word out and solicit uh feedback from

1:22:19

the neighbors and make sure we hear

1:22:21

them. So, so that's one possible use.

1:22:24

Another would be a small hotel that

1:22:27

would require zoning use relief.

1:22:31

We're not allowed to do that right now

1:22:32

with CN zoning. So, again, we'd have to

1:22:34

go in front of the neighbors.

1:22:37

Whether or not that's even in the cards

1:22:39

or not is to be determined. you know,

1:22:41

we'd have first have to attract someone

1:22:42

to go in front of zoning, you know, so

1:22:45

we're somewhat limited. It's a big

1:22:47

building. Um, and then the next slide.

1:22:50

Oh, I'm sorry. I'm go back to So, the

1:22:54

building itself is 203,000 square ft.

1:22:58

Uh, it's five stories. We are utilizing

1:23:03

124 of residential and retail is 15,000.

1:23:07

So, it's about 139 of the 203. So that

1:23:10

gives you an idea. There's still 63,000

1:23:13

square feet which in itself is a whole

1:23:16

project.

1:23:18

Um and then building two is another 27.

1:23:21

So it's

1:23:23

90,000 square feet. That

1:23:28

it's a lot. Um next slide. And this is

1:23:33

an important slide because this is the

1:23:35

first floor which is massive. It's all

1:23:38

the back of house for the hospital and

1:23:41

you are somewhat limited to what you can

1:23:43

do down there. I mean there is window on

1:23:46

the four street side.

1:23:51

Um so we could do residential units

1:23:53

there but I mean even we have a lot of

1:23:57

amenity uh carved out here. You still

1:24:01

have a lot of future. So,

1:24:04

um, but the retail along Fourth Street

1:24:06

is really what we're we're excited about

1:24:10

trying to make, um, as much of that

1:24:12

happen as possible. And so, the grocery

1:24:14

would go in the corner right now, and I

1:24:16

just got plans back from

1:24:19

from that merchant, uh, on Saturday, and

1:24:22

we're going to meet on Friday

1:24:24

and start to work the numbers and see if

1:24:27

we can come to a an agreement there. And

1:24:30

then the middle section is what we had

1:24:33

called out as a possible restaurant. It

1:24:35

is also too big for a restaurant.

1:24:38

Um, so it could be two or three

1:24:41

restaurants. Honestly, it's big enough.

1:24:46

Um, if anybody's interested in some old

1:24:49

boiler room steel,

1:24:51

we're we're taking inquiries. I mean,

1:24:53

that thing is loaded with boiler room

1:24:56

steel. But

1:24:59

um and then the the far left is was the

1:25:02

old wash room and we had that pegged as

1:25:05

a gym.

1:25:07

It's too big for a gym,

1:25:11

but I mean certainly a portion of it and

1:25:14

there's a good amount of amenity here

1:25:16

that we could we could make use of and

1:25:18

more retail if if there's an interest.

1:25:21

But the the retail is somewhat

1:25:23

fragmented. It's not like a strip mall

1:25:26

because there's space in between. So,

1:25:28

it's sort of isolated, but it still will

1:25:30

generate some foot traffic. Next slide,

1:25:33

please.

1:25:36

Um

1:25:38

I This is a slide I presented last time.

1:25:40

There's at least $30 million in

1:25:42

construction, about uh 50 full-time

1:25:46

equivalent

1:25:48

conservatively

1:25:50

uh phase three jobs and 70 I think the

1:25:53

last applicant said 15 and this is more

1:25:57

than three times the size. So I think

1:25:59

that's conservative 50 but um

1:26:04

and uh they this building would be 90.

1:26:08

So, it's a lot of jobs. And our our goal

1:26:11

is to try to

1:26:14

we're going to try to split this

1:26:15

building up so that more folks that are

1:26:18

local can participate and get their beak

1:26:22

wet, so to speak. Um there's plenty of

1:26:24

work to go around.

1:26:26

There's really too much for anyone

1:26:28

contractor here in any trade. So,

1:26:32

we expect there will be two or three

1:26:35

drywall and framing contractors. uh two

1:26:38

or three demo contractors,

1:26:40

two or three electricians, you know, or

1:26:42

more, whatever it needs to be. Um but

1:26:44

that it's it's a good opportunity for

1:26:46

that.

1:26:48

Um next slide.

1:26:51

Uh we talked about uh not to beat a dead

1:26:54

horse, but we have meetings six and

1:26:56

seven coming up on 23 and 210,

1:27:01

and we'll go through uh the city website

1:27:04

for that. I talked to Jared today about

1:27:06

who to do that with and he sent me the

1:27:08

information. So, we'll set that up. Uh,

1:27:12

I want to touch on I know the questions

1:27:14

will be asked, so I'm going to touch on

1:27:16

it anyhow. The past neighbor meetings,

1:27:19

the questions were around parking.

1:27:24

We talked about parking last time that

1:27:26

we have more than enough parking and

1:27:28

that a lot of the parking like right now

1:27:30

there's no one in these buildings. like

1:27:32

we're not taking up any parking in the

1:27:34

neighborhood. It's not what it's not us

1:27:36

that's doing it. It's still a concern

1:27:40

that we do not add to that. Um

1:27:46

it's really UPMC is is the issue. We've

1:27:49

offered spaces to residents if we have

1:27:52

the garage and anybody that wants one

1:27:54

and we'll continue to offer that at the

1:27:55

public meetings.

1:27:57

Um traffic was a concern as a an office

1:28:01

building. We So we we hired for building

1:28:04

three, we hired a firm to do a tripgen

1:28:08

letter and that was at the city

1:28:10

engineers request and we met with the

1:28:12

city engineer.

1:28:15

They asked us to do a campuswide letter

1:28:18

or a tripgen letter which we did. We met

1:28:20

with the city engineer. So I'll show you

1:28:22

what that showed in one second. Um

1:28:27

security and safety was a concern. you

1:28:30

know, will this bring crime into the

1:28:31

neighborhood? We explained that studies

1:28:34

would show that it does the opposite. It

1:28:36

brings

1:28:38

population that otherwise it's a it's a

1:28:42

vacant lot. Like we've found squatters,

1:28:45

you know, there's it's hard to keep up

1:28:49

with with that. There's not a fence, you

1:28:51

know, like a barbed wire fence around

1:28:53

this property. So it would bring light

1:28:56

and you know not overly done but it

1:29:00

would bring

1:29:02

attention and focus to the to the area

1:29:06

uh as far as security and safety go.

1:29:09

And then they had the neighbors had

1:29:11

construction related questions. When

1:29:13

would it start? What time would it

1:29:14

start? Things like that. We think we've

1:29:16

hopefully we've ironed that out with

1:29:18

building three. Um, in terms of we

1:29:22

haven't had complaints. Uh, we did have

1:29:24

one call a neighbor explained that there

1:29:27

was a strobing light going off in our

1:29:29

building. So, that's good. It was an

1:29:32

false alarm, but

1:29:34

that was good. I think it was a power

1:29:35

outage or something in the area. Next

1:29:38

slide, please.

1:29:40

We showed you the parking plan last

1:29:42

time, and that's the garage that Jeffrey

1:29:44

was referring to in the upper right

1:29:46

there.

1:29:48

And so it's not nothing's changed as far

1:29:51

as that goes. We have

1:29:55

actually

1:29:57

we have more more than enough parking

1:29:59

because the parking the more than enough

1:30:01

parking was based on a certain maxed out

1:30:04

situation which we're not even going to

1:30:06

exceed with phases one and two. So

1:30:10

next slide.

1:30:14

So there it is. Uh that's the capacity.

1:30:17

Next slide.

1:30:20

Um, this you didn't see. Uh, this was

1:30:23

the trip. This was the, uh, campuswide

1:30:26

tripgen. The most recent use of this was

1:30:30

as office and we went over this with the

1:30:33

city engineer building one, which is the

1:30:36

ones that are circled.

1:30:39

We just lost that lease like a year and

1:30:42

some months ago. Um,

1:30:45

so it'll go from 252 peak in the AM to

1:30:51

66 as an apartment building

1:30:54

at 240 to 266 and on the weekend 179 to

1:30:59

63. So it's a redu a significant

1:31:02

reduction from an office use to a

1:31:05

apartment building use and

1:31:06

multi-residential use

1:31:09

uh mixed use. Next slide.

1:31:13

That's it.

1:31:18

>> All right. Thank you very much. That was

1:31:20

a a great presentation. Um I personally

1:31:23

have uh a stake in this project just

1:31:27

because I live not too terribly far away

1:31:29

and hopefully um the retail is going to

1:31:32

be something that we can enjoy. I love

1:31:34

the idea of bringing a grocery store a

1:31:36

little closer to home that I can walk to

1:31:38

and and and take items back. And also as

1:31:41

a hotel, excuse me, not a hotel. Very

1:31:44

wishful thinking there. But as a uh

1:31:48

as a hospital, this is where I I learned

1:31:51

my grandmother was human. So getting

1:31:54

Yeah. Actually, she she became sick. And

1:31:56

before that, you know, you you just look

1:31:58

at your your your parents, your

1:31:59

grandparents is they're they're super

1:32:01

human. But right there is so it's a it's

1:32:02

a it's a piece of of Harrisburg history

1:32:05

that does mean a lot to me. And I and I

1:32:07

appreciate you um touching base on some

1:32:11

of the questions that I would I would

1:32:12

have had for you is definitely want to

1:32:14

see minority uh and and diverse business

1:32:17

um uh

1:32:20

access to this to this project as well

1:32:22

as a lot of our our local residents

1:32:24

because again we want to keep as much of

1:32:26

that money in the city limits as

1:32:28

possible um so that we're we're

1:32:30

providing good jobs for for our

1:32:32

residents. Um, and it it may have been

1:32:34

in there just of curiosity from uh from

1:32:38

our last discussion. What what is like

1:32:40

the the mix of apartments? Are we

1:32:42

looking at one bedrooms, two bedrooms?

1:32:44

>> So, it's uh studios to two beds. We may

1:32:47

in building three have some three beds.

1:32:49

Um, we're going to continue to look at,

1:32:53

you know, what the market says. It's

1:32:55

really saying studios ones, twos, but we

1:32:58

we have enough room to have some threes.

1:33:00

Um, so we'll I think we'll have some

1:33:02

threes. The rents are

1:33:06

uh they were a tad higher, they're a tad

1:33:10

lower now. Uh we start in the mid 900s

1:33:13

for studio

1:33:15

and uh we're right now we're we're not

1:33:19

at subsidized

1:33:21

you know low-inccome h tax tax credit

1:33:23

housing levels of affordability

1:33:27

but we are at market rate 80% AMI for

1:33:30

many of our units. um the financing that

1:33:33

we have just won't allow for u

1:33:38

the lower level of affordability like

1:33:40

30% AMI.

1:33:42

>> Um but like the last applicant, we're

1:33:46

actually

1:33:48

we're meeting with Brian Hudson, we're

1:33:50

we're exploring

1:33:52

really being able to do affordable with

1:33:55

the right financing.

1:33:57

um Allah

1:33:59

Tar Castile and Leseawn McCoy and Aaron

1:34:03

Donald like those guys got his

1:34:05

low-inccome housing tax credits which is

1:34:07

what you need for that level of

1:34:09

affordability whether you do four or 9%

1:34:12

deter you know it's whether or not

1:34:14

you're at 30 or

1:34:16

50 or 60% we're at 80 but that's what

1:34:19

the private market would require but

1:34:23

that's where our levels are so it's that

1:34:25

mix and about that that uh price around

1:34:30

u 13 to450 for a one bed and uh 1,600

1:34:36

for a two bed.

1:34:39

>> Okay. Thank you very much.

1:34:40

>> Yeah,

1:34:40

>> that's that's everything I had as far as

1:34:43

questions. So, I will uh come to my left

1:34:47

here with uh Councilwoman Green if you

1:34:49

have any questions.

1:34:51

>> Thank you very much. Thank you,

1:34:52

gentlemen, for being here tonight. Um, I

1:34:54

don't really have many questions. We've

1:34:56

discussed this project a few times over.

1:34:58

So, glad to see it it progressing and

1:35:00

moving forward. Also glad to see that

1:35:02

you're using some some local companies

1:35:04

uh in the construction uh which is

1:35:06

something that you discussed, but a lot

1:35:07

of times we never hear the followup

1:35:09

whether people actually use them or not.

1:35:11

Everyone says they're going to, but not

1:35:12

many actually do. So, thank you for

1:35:14

following through with that. So, thank

1:35:15

you.

1:35:17

>> Thank you, Vice President Jones.

1:35:20

>> Thank you. Thank you for uh coming in uh

1:35:22

this evening and giving us an update.

1:35:25

But I will just share that I I have been

1:35:27

to this site several times and um you

1:35:30

are correct, Councilwoman Green, that um

1:35:33

I I've actually seen locals working

1:35:35

there and and and I thank you. Um she's

1:35:38

correct. A lot of people come in and say

1:35:40

that they're going to do these things.

1:35:42

Not that we have any compliance around

1:35:43

that. And hopefully it's okay that I

1:35:46

stop by because I don't want to seem

1:35:47

like I'm the compliance officer.

1:35:49

>> You're all welcome.

1:35:51

I I did go there and I seen it and um

1:35:53

>> just stop telling our contractors what

1:35:55

to do. But

1:35:57

>> no uh but I really appreciate that

1:35:59

because um that that is something that's

1:36:01

very near and dear to my heart. Not that

1:36:02

my uh opinion or you know uh weighs on

1:36:06

this project. But I I really am glad to

1:36:08

see that that that's happening. And um

1:36:10

to hear the future um I agree with

1:36:13

Councilman um Lawson um grocery stores.

1:36:15

We know we're in a food desert. that's

1:36:17

something that's really needed in the

1:36:19

city and I think um again being in that

1:36:21

walkable area it would definitely help

1:36:23

the residents and the last thing that I

1:36:25

would say is um please keep me updated

1:36:27

because I did um come to a few of the

1:36:30

first community meetings that you had um

1:36:32

and just giving that update I just I

1:36:34

would love to hear what some of the

1:36:36

residents in that area have to say about

1:36:38

the potential of the things that you're

1:36:40

looking to do and where they're at with

1:36:42

that. So and I can also share that with

1:36:44

my colleagues. So again, I just want to

1:36:45

thank you uh for bringing this project

1:36:47

to our city and uh keep up the good

1:36:49

work.

1:36:50

>> 700,000

1:36:53

>> taxes.

1:36:57

Well, I'll say thank you, Vice President

1:37:00

Jones, and I'm going to say thank you

1:37:01

for that 700,000 as as well, President

1:37:05

Hill.

1:37:06

>> Thank you. Good evening. Um many I think

1:37:09

many of my questions um were answered

1:37:12

through your presentation, but I'm

1:37:15

excited we're moving to phase two. Um

1:37:18

also excited that the grocery store

1:37:21

you'reing a local merchant, so that's

1:37:23

really exciting. I hope their daughter

1:37:25

feels better. Um a restaurant or

1:37:29

restaurant. Um the gym, maybe downsizing

1:37:33

the gym. Um, and then some of the

1:37:35

concerns of the neighbors. I'm glad to

1:37:38

hear that you're continuing to

1:37:40

communicate. That was going to be one of

1:37:41

my questions. Um, but the two meetings

1:37:44

on February the 3rd and February 10th,

1:37:48

I'm hopeful that you'll have good

1:37:49

attendance there. Um, also happy to hear

1:37:53

that you're re-evaluating the rent

1:37:55

range. Um, I'm sure you knew that was

1:37:58

going to be a question of mine

1:38:00

>> somehow.

1:38:00

>> Not so much. Not so much. um

1:38:05

the low income. I'm trying to capture

1:38:09

the median. So, those that fall in the

1:38:12

middle that sometimes um don't have an

1:38:16

option for affordable housing. So, um

1:38:20

that would be in your discussions

1:38:23

um moving forward. Just remember that

1:38:26

catchall in the middle that sometimes um

1:38:30

is not eligible right for the low income

1:38:33

um

1:38:35

set aides and then

1:38:38

it they don't make enough for the um

1:38:41

higher rent range. So just keeping that

1:38:45

communication open around the rent I

1:38:47

think will be helpful for me. But um I

1:38:50

don't have any other questions. Thank

1:38:52

you for your updates.

1:38:56

Thank you. Um, Councilwoman Green or

1:38:58

Green,

1:38:59

>> don't worry. I I messed yours up

1:39:01

earlier, so you got me. I

1:39:05

>> um No. Um, I was just also going to uh

1:39:09

just the same sentiments as um President

1:39:12

Hill with the median income because

1:39:14

there are those those slight people in

1:39:16

the middle. I always say I've been one

1:39:18

of those who just um I don't get

1:39:20

approved for lower income, but I really

1:39:23

don't make enough for what they want me

1:39:25

to pay. So, just that little middle

1:39:26

person. So, just thank you again for

1:39:29

think rethinking those prices. Um and I

1:39:32

also wanted to say I I applaud you for

1:39:34

trying to find retail businesses, local

1:39:37

ones to come in. Um I think the grocery

1:39:40

store idea is great. We are in a food

1:39:42

desert as um Vice President Jones said.

1:39:44

So having that grocery store right there

1:39:46

helps a lot of um individuals, a lot of

1:39:49

people get to food and people who aren't

1:39:51

living in that building, people around

1:39:52

the neighborhood. So I think that's just

1:39:55

going to pump up our local businesses

1:39:57

and really help our residents. I know

1:39:59

you guys were looking for more ideas. So

1:40:01

I was over here thinking to definitely a

1:40:03

hairdresser. If you find one, just say

1:40:06

it helps. Um, but even with the gym, I

1:40:10

know you said that space was really

1:40:11

huge. So, if you can put an indoor track

1:40:13

within that gym, I think I know a lot of

1:40:16

people say, you know, there's isn't one

1:40:18

really. I mean, there is a talion lake

1:40:21

near there in a way. You can walk on

1:40:23

Front Street, but if you can't go

1:40:25

outside, I feel like an indoor track is

1:40:27

helpful. And then it also helps people

1:40:29

in the neighborhood to come in and use

1:40:31

those facilities, too, as you all let

1:40:34

them. So, I just wanted to throw out

1:40:36

some ideas and say thank you.

1:40:38

>> Can I touch on that?

1:40:39

>> Yeah, sure.

1:40:40

>> So,

1:40:42

regarding the grosser, you know, we also

1:40:44

don't want to be the the developer that

1:40:47

brings a grosser in from outside. That's

1:40:50

going to that's just going to fail

1:40:52

>> because they're not connected with the

1:40:54

community. They're too big. The the the

1:40:57

quality is not there. The prices are too

1:40:59

high. Like so this grosser we're excited

1:41:03

is that they have two locations. One is

1:41:06

about 3,000 square feet, one's about

1:41:09

2,000. So the combined of those two is

1:41:12

5,000. Like

1:41:14

>> this would probably be cheaper rent.

1:41:16

>> Right.

1:41:16

>> Honestly, and we're we're looking to try

1:41:18

to make it work. Like

1:41:20

>> Right. And like you said, they're local,

1:41:21

so people know them. They're connected

1:41:23

to the community. They know those needs.

1:41:25

So um that was really that's really

1:41:27

important. So, I think that's a great

1:41:29

idea.

1:41:30

>> So, I'm glad you all you I can see that.

1:41:33

So, thank you because it's a like you

1:41:34

said, it's a huge vacant building and to

1:41:36

leave it the way it is will bring more

1:41:38

crime. That's a fact. There's statistics

1:41:41

on that. More blighted buildings, more

1:41:44

crime. So, um

1:41:46

>> with the school, middle school,

1:41:48

>> right? The pendant. Yeah.

1:41:50

>> The old um v high school and then a

1:41:52

vocational school. So, I I just think

1:41:54

that um this is needed. So, just thank

1:41:57

you. Um, but that's it for me,

1:42:00

Councilman Lawson.

1:42:03

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

1:42:09

>> All right, Councilman Rodriguez.

1:42:10

>> Thank you, Chair Lawson. Um, it's

1:42:13

refreshing when developers come in front

1:42:15

of us and they listen. I'm not saying we

1:42:18

know all or have the recipe, but uh you

1:42:21

know, if you add up all the years that

1:42:23

you know, we've been residents in

1:42:24

Harrisburg, it's a pretty heavy weight,

1:42:26

you know, on this uh day, and it's just

1:42:29

it's refreshing that you take the ideas

1:42:31

and even if you can't, you try to work

1:42:32

them in. Um everything from the progress

1:42:34

chart to the community outreach update.

1:42:37

It's refreshing. A lot of times we ask

1:42:39

for this feedback. We ask for, you know,

1:42:40

have you done community outreach? You've

1:42:42

came with a whole table, right? And

1:42:44

showed how it goes on. Um, it's very

1:42:46

appreciative and it seems like to me

1:42:48

you're building an ecosystem where

1:42:50

families can work, eat, live, learn,

1:42:51

play all in one setting. Don't have to

1:42:54

travel too far. From the kind of setting

1:42:56

that you're putting together in the

1:42:57

team, you won't even need a car, you

1:42:59

know, really. You you'll be

1:43:00

selfestablished right where you are. And

1:43:02

and and that that's just pie in the sky.

1:43:04

That's amazing. Um, I know we previously

1:43:07

previously spoke about a jazz club. Is

1:43:09

that like out out the window?

1:43:12

I mean, honestly, the the Well,

1:43:16

>> I'm a I'm a huge jazz person myself. Um,

1:43:20

>> but I'm not going to sit here and shine

1:43:21

you on like

1:43:23

>> the neighbors are concerned about noise.

1:43:26

Now, if we can design it in like to a

1:43:28

restaurant where we I we I can't sit up

1:43:32

here and do something different than I

1:43:33

told the neighbors.

1:43:34

>> Absolutely.

1:43:35

Uh but if we can design it in like back

1:43:38

off the street and it's not going to be

1:43:41

a problem for the neighbors.

1:43:43

>> Yeah,

1:43:43

>> absolutely.

1:43:44

>> All day long.

1:43:44

>> And it's not like you said like a a

1:43:46

hip-hop forum where they'll be, you

1:43:48

know, artists coming and doing big

1:43:49

shows. Jazz is really kind of, you know,

1:43:52

sedated, lowkey. Um but it is up to

1:43:55

those residents in that area and their,

1:43:57

you know, uh thoughts and suggestions

1:43:58

nonetheless. But even the flex space

1:44:00

community rooms on each floor, you know,

1:44:02

where you're giving families the

1:44:04

opportunity to maybe celebrate birthdays

1:44:05

or have meeting spaces, you know,

1:44:08

community spaces, that that's huge. So,

1:44:10

um, thank you. And also, I'm very

1:44:11

appreciative that you kept your word

1:44:13

with the parking and allowing the

1:44:14

residents to park in the ample spaces,

1:44:16

you know, for anyone that needed help.

1:44:18

Um, one thing I did want to touch on and

1:44:20

I had a question for was the refues. I

1:44:22

know, um, trash was something that we

1:44:25

weren't too sure of where to keep units.

1:44:28

Um, has an inside incinerator ever been

1:44:31

thought of where families can just kind

1:44:32

of come in the hallway, pull the bin

1:44:34

down, throw the trash?

1:44:35

>> We have We have a trash shoot.

1:44:36

>> Oh, there is a shoot. Okay. Because I

1:44:38

know previously it was up in the air.

1:44:40

Wasn't really too sure where we keep the

1:44:41

bins and the black cans. And so the

1:44:44

chute is like the way we

1:44:46

>> It's in the design.

1:44:47

>> Oh, that' be amazing. I think that would

1:44:49

be amazing and the best way to go.

1:44:50

>> The only way to go. You can't rely on

1:44:53

anybody, you know, somebody. So, I have

1:44:57

partners that

1:44:59

tried to talk me out of it. Like,

1:45:01

>> they they're not apartment people. They

1:45:03

don't know. They just they're trying to

1:45:04

save a buck. Like, it's not going to

1:45:06

work cuz it's tight. This is a tight

1:45:08

project

1:45:08

>> and it's huge. And it's huge. And I know

1:45:11

growing up in um project facilities.

1:45:13

We've always had that floor to floor in

1:45:15

New Jersey. There's like 15 floors and

1:45:17

each floor you got that shoot, you throw

1:45:19

the trash down, done deal.

1:45:21

>> You have to make it and then you still

1:45:22

have to clean up. You still have to

1:45:24

>> and you can't get mad.

1:45:25

>> Yep.

1:45:25

>> Like you just got to do it.

1:45:26

>> Yep. No, I think that's a great idea and

1:45:28

and a great compromise and resolve

1:45:30

>> trash and track trash compactor

1:45:32

>> and that'll go straight down to like the

1:45:34

basement area.

1:45:34

>> It goes into the first floor where

1:45:36

there's a compactor and then that gets

1:45:37

picked up. What we have to work out is

1:45:39

whether or not it's a compactor with uh

1:45:41

public services, but

1:45:42

>> Gotcha.

1:45:43

>> There will be um trash shoot for sure.

1:45:46

100%.

1:45:46

>> Awesome. Well,

1:45:47

>> and 99 this is so building 3 is 99. This

1:45:50

is 131. So it adds to 230. Okay.

1:45:53

>> Um,

1:45:55

yeah, there'll probably be two in

1:45:56

building one.

1:45:57

>> That'd be amazing. That'd be amazing and

1:45:59

easier for maybe our seniors that may be

1:46:01

in there that can't go all the way

1:46:03

downstairs, dispose their trash, go all

1:46:04

the way back up. That'd be so

1:46:06

convenient. So, thank you for uh

1:46:08

listening and taking what we say and,

1:46:10

you know, and just kind of being

1:46:12

proactive with it all. So, thank you for

1:46:13

your presentation and thank you, Mr.

1:46:14

Jeff. That's all I have.

1:46:16

>> Thank you. And Councilwoman Davis.

1:46:19

>> Thank you, Councilman Lawson. And good

1:46:21

evening um again, Mr. Halquist. Good to

1:46:24

see you.

1:46:25

>> Good to see you.

1:46:27

>> I want to just make a statement in

1:46:30

regards to the grocery store. I used to

1:46:33

live in that neighborhood and I would

1:46:36

drive either to Camp Hill to Giant, to

1:46:40

Linglestown to Giant or out on 29th

1:46:44

Street to Giant to go to to get decent

1:46:47

food. Um, I remember the grocery store

1:46:50

that was there. There was a lot of

1:46:51

processed food, a lot of lowquality

1:46:54

food. And unfortunately, I don't think

1:46:57

everybody could go to the other grocery

1:47:00

stores. So, I would just um encourage

1:47:04

you to keep that in mind and I'm sure

1:47:06

you will just to have whole fresh foods

1:47:09

there for the for the neighborhood and

1:47:12

affordable hopefully also too. So you

1:47:16

said whole foods and you said whole

1:47:18

fresh foods.

1:47:21

>> Whole fresh foods.

1:47:22

>> Okay,

1:47:24

>> that's

1:47:26

Yeah, but that's all.

1:47:28

>> No, we will we'll we'll talk a little

1:47:30

bit more about that.

1:47:31

>> Okay. Thank you, Councilman Lawson.

1:47:33

That's it for me.

1:47:34

>> Thank you. Um, I'm going to uh like to

1:47:39

uh move resolution uh 5 uh 2026 to our

1:47:44

next le leg legislative session. And uh

1:47:47

this will and actually well I got a lot

1:47:50

of positive feedback, but I'm going to

1:47:51

ask my council members to support this

1:47:54

as well as as we look to move that to

1:47:56

the next legislative meeting and then

1:47:58

that would conclude the business for uh

1:48:02

economic development.

1:48:04

Thank you very much.

1:48:07

Our next committee business lies with

1:48:10

the public safety committee. I will

1:48:12

defer to our public safety committee

1:48:15

chair, Councilwoman Green, to lead

1:48:17

discussion.

1:48:19

>> Thank you very much. Uh the public

1:48:21

safety committee is going to discuss

1:48:23

resolution 1 of 2026. Mr. Humphre, if

1:48:26

you wouldn't mind reading the resolution

1:48:27

into the record.

1:48:29

Resolution 1 of 2026, a resolution

1:48:32

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

1:48:34

negotiate and enter into a professional

1:48:36

services agreement with WCA public

1:48:39

safety assessments for the purpose of

1:48:41

providing psychological testing and

1:48:43

assessment for the city's Bureau of

1:48:44

Police.

1:48:47

>> Thank you very much. If you wouldn't

1:48:48

mind introducing yourselves and then um

1:48:50

you can move forward with your

1:48:51

presentation and we'll open up for

1:48:52

questions afterwards. Don't try to dodge

1:48:54

the mic now.

1:48:55

>> I never dodged anything. He's not shy.

1:48:58

I'm not shy at all. Hello, city council

1:49:00

members. Welcome back to 2026 and uh I'm

1:49:04

Commissioner Thomas Carter and to my um

1:49:08

right is uh Deputy Chief Kenneth Young.

1:49:12

>> Good evening and thank you for having us

1:49:14

again. I'm Deputy Chief Young. Uh this

1:49:16

resolution is actually is an annual one

1:49:19

that we did last year. Actually, for the

1:49:20

last two years, if you remember before

1:49:22

that, for the ones that have been here

1:49:23

for a little bit, we used uh Dr. Laguna.

1:49:25

Um Dr. Laguna is no longer in business.

1:49:28

So, which is unfortunate and then to try

1:49:30

to find somebody that provides these

1:49:32

services in this area is rather

1:49:34

challenging. Um, so this is a resolution

1:49:37

to enter into uh to professional

1:49:40

services agreement with uh WCA uh public

1:49:43

safety assessment and what they are

1:49:45

offering or what we need from them would

1:49:47

be psychological services. I guess the

1:49:49

best way to explain what those services

1:49:51

are is if you look at exhibit A. Um it

1:49:55

gets into agreement and on the back side

1:49:58

it tells you what the what exactly these

1:50:00

services are for. So it would be uh for

1:50:02

post uh conditional offers of

1:50:04

psychological evaluation. So as part of

1:50:06

that hiring process they uh to get them

1:50:09

into the academy and to be certified

1:50:10

through the commonwealth we need to get

1:50:12

them a psychological evaluation on them.

1:50:15

So that's part of that service. Uh we

1:50:16

don't use the promotional evaluation but

1:50:19

that's something that that

1:50:21

we're going to begin to explore. I think

1:50:23

that's a valid option to see what uh to

1:50:26

see where they're at as far as that

1:50:28

goes. Fitness for duty evaluations,

1:50:30

wellness visits, the uh post-traumatic

1:50:32

stress uh disorder evaluations. Um and

1:50:36

then you got the specialized

1:50:37

evaluations. The ones that we use

1:50:39

typically the most would be the u uh

1:50:42

postcond conditional psychological

1:50:43

evaluations for any new hires, fitness

1:50:45

for duty, wellness, and then the uh PTSD

1:50:48

after critical events uh an evaluation

1:50:51

that uh that we're required to have. Uh

1:50:53

if we look at uh the rates from 25 into

1:50:57

uh this year, uh the fitness for duty

1:51:01

went up by $50 from 250 in 2025 to 300.

1:51:05

wellness went up um for uh from 200 to

1:51:09

250 and then the the the u the traumatic

1:51:12

um traumatic post-traumatic uh

1:51:16

evaluations went from 500 to 525 minor

1:51:19

increases um that uh that I mean there

1:51:24

it's standard when you get to to this

1:51:26

stuff.

1:51:30

>> Thank you very much. Um I don't have

1:51:32

many questions. Thank you for noting the

1:51:34

price increases. That was one thing that

1:51:35

I was going to note. Um, and just I

1:51:38

guess kind of a question, this is not

1:51:39

just used for police, it's used for fire

1:51:42

as well, correct? These services al also

1:51:43

used by the fire department.

1:51:45

>> This is just for the police department.

1:51:46

>> Okay. Because it says police, fire,

1:51:48

dispatch, postcond conditional

1:51:49

psychological evaluation.

1:51:51

>> Yeah, I think that's how he groups it

1:51:52

together.

1:51:53

>> Okay.

1:51:53

>> So, he he provides services. The WCA

1:51:56

specializes in in public safety. So, I

1:51:59

think that's just how he's outlining it

1:52:00

on the exhibit A, but we would just use

1:52:02

it for this would be just for police.

1:52:04

I'm not sure who the fire department

1:52:05

uses.

1:52:06

>> Okay. I'll have to follow up on that

1:52:07

because I know last year in the fire

1:52:09

department's um quarterly reports in

1:52:11

quarter 1, two, and three, they um note

1:52:14

the consultation fee by the same company

1:52:16

for their psychological evaluation. So,

1:52:18

I'll just follow up with them because I

1:52:20

think they do use the same company and

1:52:21

it's the same fee structure there.

1:52:22

>> Yeah, they're hard. There's if you look,

1:52:24

there's really not a whole lot of people

1:52:26

around that do this any longer. when we

1:52:28

lost our local connection with uh with

1:52:30

Dr. Lagona, this was the nearest place

1:52:33

that we could get. And they're fortunate

1:52:34

because a lot of the testing, we can

1:52:36

actually bring them here. We don't have

1:52:37

to send people to their to their office.

1:52:39

So, they're doing the prehire prehire

1:52:41

valuations. They do all that stuff here

1:52:43

for us.

1:52:45

>> Okay. Thank you. I don't have any other

1:52:47

questions regarding this resolution. I'm

1:52:50

going to open it up to my colleagues.

1:52:51

I'll start to my immediate right with

1:52:52

Councilman Lawson. Do you have any

1:52:54

questions for uh Deputy Chief Young or

1:52:56

Commissioner Carter?

1:52:58

>> I I do not have any any questions at

1:53:00

this time. Thank you.

1:53:03

>> Thank you. Um Vice President Jones, any

1:53:05

questions?

1:53:07

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. No

1:53:08

questions.

1:53:09

>> President Hill, any questions?

1:53:11

>> I don't have any questions. Thank you.

1:53:13

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

1:53:15

questions?

1:53:15

>> Good evening to you both. I just had a

1:53:17

really quick question just for

1:53:18

clarification. Um the pricing is it is

1:53:21

per officer per visit or just per

1:53:24

officer.

1:53:26

Um and it's just how many visits they go

1:53:29

for the

1:53:30

>> depends. Yep. Sorry. It depends on what

1:53:32

it is. Some of it's per hour.

1:53:34

>> You get into a fitness for duty

1:53:36

evaluation that's a couple hour test or

1:53:39

a uh a post-traumatic stress incident

1:53:41

that's a couple hours. So there's a

1:53:43

>> their hourly rate uh is what is what

1:53:46

they're is what's listed.

1:53:48

>> All right. Thank I just want that

1:53:49

clarification because we can hear

1:53:51

prices. No, no, you didn't do anything

1:53:53

wrong. But I think not just I but

1:53:55

public, you know, people who are

1:53:56

listening are here just wondering how

1:53:58

does is that like that's hourly, but not

1:54:00

knowing if it was like per officer

1:54:02

that's the one fee or

1:54:04

>> some of those take an hour. So really

1:54:05

that's what the fee is per hour. Some of

1:54:07

them are a little more in depth

1:54:09

depending on the circumstances of the

1:54:11

person being evaluated,

1:54:13

>> right? No, it's needed. I think that

1:54:15

this um is a service that we need just,

1:54:17

you know. So, thank you. That's it for

1:54:20

me.

1:54:21

>> Thank you, Council Member Rodriguez. Any

1:54:22

questions?

1:54:23

>> Um, always a pleasure to see you,

1:54:24

gentlemen. I have no questions. Thank

1:54:26

you.

1:54:26

>> Thank you.

1:54:27

>> Thank you very much. And Councilwoman

1:54:29

Davis, any questions?

1:54:31

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Green. Uh, good

1:54:33

evening, officers. No questions for me.

1:54:36

>> Thank you.

1:54:37

>> Thank you very much. As far as

1:54:38

resolution one, I'm going to recommend

1:54:40

this is moved to our next legislative

1:54:42

session agenda. But while we still have

1:54:44

you guys here, um I know I did speak

1:54:46

with Commissioner Carter about some

1:54:48

concerns the residents had uh as far as

1:54:50

ICE agents in the city and if the city

1:54:52

has any formalized agreement with uh the

1:54:54

department. So if you could just speak

1:54:56

to that, I'd appreciate it.

1:55:00

>> Back in uh

1:55:05

back in the early 2000s, u we did have

1:55:08

one.

1:55:10

Uh we have not

1:55:13

I can't say we have not worked with ICE

1:55:16

because if we come across a traffic stop

1:55:18

and if somebody is warned by any federal

1:55:21

entity then we're obligated to contact

1:55:25

that agency.

1:55:27

Uh I believe that we have done a couple

1:55:30

traffic stops and um there was a

1:55:34

detainer by ICE so we had to contact ICE

1:55:36

to come and pick up that person. As far

1:55:39

as going on any raids or anything with

1:55:42

ICE. We have not done that. And the

1:55:45

responsibility that we have is to stand

1:55:49

by. We're not going on raids with them.

1:55:52

But uh we can't let anything happen to a

1:55:54

nice agent because they're federal

1:55:56

agents and they're police officers

1:55:58

officers too. But as far as going on

1:56:00

raids, no, we don't do that.

1:56:03

I did hear that they were at the farm

1:56:05

show, but we had nothing to do with that

1:56:08

and they were middle somewhere like

1:56:10

that, you know, according to Facebook

1:56:12

and and things like that, but we had

1:56:14

nothing to do with that.

1:56:17

>> So, just just so we're clear, I mean,

1:56:19

they're not calling us and telling us

1:56:21

where they're at within the city when

1:56:22

they get here. So, a lot of times how

1:56:25

we're coming across that is that uh

1:56:27

either we're running across them when

1:56:29

we're out handling calls and and

1:56:31

patrolling districts or they call to

1:56:34

say, you know, something's wrong um that

1:56:37

we get there. has that happened? I don't

1:56:39

know of any incidents where that's

1:56:41

happened, but I'd have to check that

1:56:42

out. But yeah, we're not we're not going

1:56:45

like we're not teaming up with them.

1:56:46

There's no information exchange. There's

1:56:48

none of that going on.

1:56:51

>> Thank you very much. I just uh thought

1:56:52

that that was a conversation we should

1:56:54

have because it was brought up last

1:56:55

meeting and I know several residents

1:56:56

have wretched out about it. Uh anybody

1:56:58

else have any questions or comments

1:57:00

regarding it?

1:57:02

>> I'll start with Councilman Lawson. just

1:57:04

just the question just because I I I I'm

1:57:07

trying to wrap my head around how these

1:57:09

things work. So if we're not working

1:57:12

with them, how do we protect our our

1:57:17

citizens? And I'm not saying to protect

1:57:19

from any lawful activity happening

1:57:23

through ICE, but if situations become to

1:57:26

the point where we do need uh police

1:57:30

protection for for residents, whether it

1:57:33

be through bystanders or just as we saw

1:57:37

what happened with Min Minnesota,

1:57:39

someone getting in a situation to where

1:57:42

it becomes a a a dangerous situation.

1:57:44

How how do we walk that line there? And

1:57:47

it's it and there may not be an answer,

1:57:49

but I'm just I'm sure everyone wonders

1:57:51

how do we how do we work in a situation

1:57:54

like this where we can keep our

1:57:55

residents safe while,

1:57:59

you know, we have

1:58:01

forces coming from the federal a side

1:58:04

that we may not have control over.

1:58:08

>> The Minnesota situation is an

1:58:11

unfortunate

1:58:12

incident. There are many incidents right

1:58:14

now that are going on nationwide that

1:58:16

law enforcement, local law for

1:58:19

enforcement has no no control over and

1:58:23

no power over. I would advise our

1:58:25

citizens that if they are stopped by

1:58:27

ICE, just cooperate

1:58:30

because if we don't cooperate then

1:58:32

matters will just get worse. We are not

1:58:34

going to stand by and let ice beat on

1:58:37

anybody or anything like that, you know,

1:58:40

but you know, we don't want to get into

1:58:42

a confrontation with them either

1:58:44

because, you know, if that happens, no

1:58:47

one wins,

1:58:49

you know. So, I would just advise them

1:58:52

to give the ID to cooperate and usually

1:58:55

when ICE when they're in a area,

1:58:59

they know who they are after. They have

1:59:01

pictures of them and everything like

1:59:03

that. it doesn't go rolling into a

1:59:05

neighborhood and don't know who they're

1:59:08

looking for. So, um, if ice rolls up on

1:59:12

the hill or up town or the southside, I

1:59:15

would advise our citizens to cooperate.

1:59:19

Don't start anything. Just do what they

1:59:21

asked them to do because the Minnesota

1:59:23

situation, you know, there's been a

1:59:25

couple other situations like that, too.

1:59:28

And, um, it's just sad. It's just sad.

1:59:33

anything.

1:59:36

>> Thank you, uh, Vice President Jones.

1:59:38

>> Yeah. Uh, thank you guys and thank you,

1:59:40

uh, Councilwoman Green for, um, bringing

1:59:42

that up. Uh, one of the things that we

1:59:44

are looking at, and again, for thatou,

1:59:47

it wasn't it really wasn't a resolution.

1:59:49

Um, and I think there is a huge

1:59:51

difference between the two. I think, um,

1:59:53

we are looking at legislation right now

1:59:55

to to to, uh, put in place a resolution

1:59:58

versus aou. Um, hopefully we can get

2:00:01

this through legal. I think uh myself,

2:00:03

Councilwoman Ross and Mr. Lawson and

2:00:06

also Councilwoman Green um are looking

2:00:08

at this um to adopt this legislation to

2:00:11

bring it into effect. And I do

2:00:13

understand that you guys have a a duty

2:00:16

um to not interfere with with the

2:00:20

federal uh government. And one thing

2:00:22

that I would appreciate that you said is

2:00:24

that you won't stand around and watch

2:00:26

them beat on our residents. So that was

2:00:28

a good thing that that we have that. But

2:00:29

I think this piece of legislation is um

2:00:32

important to give that um that feel of

2:00:36

protection for our residents um

2:00:39

documented, undocumented, however that

2:00:41

may be. But uh and to your point, they

2:00:44

did go around um on Liberty Street. They

2:00:46

were going around just knocking on doors

2:00:48

and asking people, "Hey, who lives next

2:00:50

door?" So um you guys may not be aware

2:00:52

of that, but that did actually take

2:00:54

place um within the last week. So, they

2:00:57

are I don't know how they're getting

2:00:59

this information. That's one of the

2:01:00

things that um I think the people are

2:01:02

very concerned about, but it's good to

2:01:04

hear that you guys aren't sharing that

2:01:06

information. And um when they got to do

2:01:09

certain things, I do understand and I

2:01:11

hope that our public understands that

2:01:13

you guys have to comply or deal with

2:01:16

those consequences on a federal level.

2:01:18

So, um that's just my input on this.

2:01:21

Thank you.

2:01:22

>> Thank you.

2:01:23

>> Thank you very much, Councilwoman Ross.

2:01:26

Um, I just wanted to say, you know, um,

2:01:28

thank you for giving us some insight on,

2:01:32

um, what the process is with ICE, that

2:01:34

you're not working with them, that of

2:01:36

course you wouldn't let them hurt any of

2:01:37

our residents, but um, how you do

2:01:39

sometimes have if you had to answer a

2:01:42

call um, because traffic stops or

2:01:46

whatnot that um, that would be something

2:01:48

or reason you would notify them, but

2:01:51

you're not willingly give them giving

2:01:53

them information. And I think that's

2:01:54

what a lot of our residents were worried

2:01:57

about. And as you stated, Chief Carter,

2:01:59

there may have been something on the

2:02:01

books in the early 2000s, but of now, we

2:02:04

don't have anything set. And I think

2:02:06

that's important for our city, just for

2:02:08

our residents to feel safe. Not taking

2:02:10

any positions on if we agree or

2:02:12

disagree, but making sure our residents

2:02:14

are safe because I think um what we do

2:02:17

see on TV right now are um citizens are

2:02:21

getting hurt. residents of those

2:02:23

communities are getting hurt, not um

2:02:26

people who we want to um put in boxes of

2:02:29

being legal or illegal, but it is

2:02:31

residents of those communities, United

2:02:33

States residents are being hurt or um

2:02:36

unfortunately losing their lives. So,

2:02:39

just having something set and I know we

2:02:41

have all been trying to look at some

2:02:42

type of um resolution um that would

2:02:46

could come down that could put just some

2:02:48

things in place to help us all out. So,

2:02:50

I thank you both for speaking on that

2:02:52

and I thank you um Councilwoman Green

2:02:54

for bringing that up tonight and looking

2:02:56

into that for not just us but for our

2:02:58

residents. So, that was it for me and

2:03:00

thank you again.

2:03:01

>> Thank you.

2:03:02

>> Thank you all for being here and thank

2:03:04

you for taking the time to answer that

2:03:05

question. Um as I said, I'm going to ask

2:03:08

that resolution 1226 be moved to our

2:03:10

legislative session agenda and thank you

2:03:12

all for everything that you do for um

2:03:14

all of us because we're residents as

2:03:16

well. I think sometimes people forget

2:03:17

that that we live here. Um, so thank you

2:03:19

for, you know, being there for our

2:03:21

residents in every way possible. Uh,

2:03:23

look forward to working with you guys to

2:03:25

continue to work. Thank you.

2:03:26

>> Thank you.

2:03:29

>> Thank you.

2:03:30

Our final committee business this

2:03:33

evening lies with the parks, recreation,

2:03:35

and enrichment committee. I will defer

2:03:38

to our parks, recreation, and enrichment

2:03:40

committee chair, Councilwoman Woman RWS,

2:03:44

to lead discussion.

2:03:45

>> Thank you, President Hill. Um, Mr. Mr.

2:03:48

Humphre, can you please read resolution

2:03:50

2 of 2026? And

2:03:52

>> resolution 2 of 2026, a resolution

2:03:55

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

2:03:57

negotiate and enter into a professional

2:03:59

services agreement with Flora Teter

2:04:02

Landscape Architects Incorporated to

2:04:04

provide landscape architectural services

2:04:06

for Vernon Street Park and Playground

2:04:08

located at 15th Street and Vernon

2:04:10

Street.

2:04:11

>> Thank you very much, Mr. Humphrey. And I

2:04:13

see we have two members from the

2:04:15

administration here to speak with us.

2:04:17

Um, please give us your name and your

2:04:19

title. Thank you.

2:04:21

>> I'm Sasha Rose, deputy director for

2:04:22

parks.

2:04:24

>> Kevin Sanders, parks and rec manager.

2:04:26

>> Thank you very much. And can you all

2:04:28

please give us some information on uh

2:04:32

this resolution?

2:04:34

>> Yes,

2:04:36

I sent over some slides uh more

2:04:38

recently.

2:04:40

>> Can you please move the microphone

2:04:42

closer to you?

2:04:43

>> Pulled over some I sent over some

2:04:45

slides. Thank you,

2:04:47

>> Mr. Cedric.

2:04:48

>> And you can it can like go right next to

2:04:50

you. I think it's it's very movable.

2:04:55

>> Okay.

2:05:00

>> Did you just send them recently?

2:05:02

>> Like

2:05:04

>> down here?

2:05:11

>> I don't have them, but we can hook your

2:05:13

laptop up.

2:05:20

Yep.

2:05:47

And while we're waiting, when you get a

2:05:48

chance, can you email me those slides as

2:05:50

well, too? Thank you.

2:05:53

Oh, and anybody else from council?

2:05:57

I Okay, you can send them to everybody,

2:05:59

please, when you get a chance. Can you

2:06:01

let them know, please? Thank you.

2:06:14

>> It's not going to allow your computer to

2:06:17

run the the program.

2:06:57

Okay.

2:07:02

You see it?

2:07:18

The slides will make it easier. I'll

2:07:20

make it quick. All right. So for 15th in

2:07:23

Vernon um we're looking to um basically

2:07:28

do a um

2:07:31

project there but the first step is to

2:07:35

apply for a grant. So we are requesting

2:07:38

uh council approval to do that. We did

2:07:41

do a RFQ for this process. We had a few

2:07:46

different uh consultants. We met with

2:07:47

them via Zoom. Um myself, other members

2:07:51

of the team. Um, so where we discovered

2:07:55

um, Floral Teeter, it's a little bit

2:07:58

more twofold. We have had other projects

2:08:01

where we've had different consultants

2:08:03

submit proposals. So that's where Foral

2:08:05

Teter came from initially. Uh, we did

2:08:08

like their proposal for the current

2:08:09

projects that we are working on, but

2:08:11

they weren't selected. Um, so we just

2:08:14

put like a poll together also from the

2:08:18

trade shows um, parks and recreation.

2:08:21

So, we try to give people opportunities

2:08:24

from different places. Um, some are

2:08:26

local, some are um in more urban areas.

2:08:29

So, foral ter while they're we like

2:08:32

that. Um, two of the other vendors also

2:08:35

had experience in there, but we are

2:08:38

leaning our group decided to go with

2:08:40

furl ter.

2:08:44

Um so basically at Fural Teter over the

2:08:47

probably last five years the community

2:08:49

and parks and wreck we have discussed

2:08:52

doing a project there at various times.

2:08:54

Um it just hasn't come to life for a

2:08:57

variety of reasons. Finances probably

2:09:00

are the most

2:09:02

important part of that aspect. Um and

2:09:05

just uh some shifting in priorities and

2:09:07

opportunities that obviously have come

2:09:09

through sort of put 15th Vern in more of

2:09:12

a stand still excuse me if you will. Uh

2:09:15

some of the goals are to improve park

2:09:17

functionality, enhance the recreation

2:09:19

space, maximize the use. It is a small

2:09:22

spot uh but also ensuring inclusivity

2:09:26

and sustainable design. Uh currently at

2:09:28

the park there are some issues there

2:09:30

with inclusivity which we are aware of.

2:09:33

Um but also the play equipment is um

2:09:37

aging out. It's over shelf life. Um it's

2:09:40

not the only park that is like this but

2:09:42

is one that is probably at the highest

2:09:45

priority in the next group outside of

2:09:48

shop. Shop's more of a replacement of

2:09:50

equipment but 15 needs a little bit more

2:09:53

actual work um to the site.

2:09:59

Um so just kind of brainstormed around

2:10:02

like I said that the RFQ

2:10:04

um where we got we had multiple

2:10:07

proposals. Um we did evaluate based on

2:10:10

ability to optimize uh small urban

2:10:12

spaces experience with urban parks or

2:10:15

likewise. Um so some of our examples are

2:10:20

schools as well as not just an urban

2:10:22

park but who impacting is still the same

2:10:25

uh young children. Um design innovation

2:10:29

and storm water. Uh we've been able to

2:10:31

actually firsthand inspect some of this

2:10:34

with rural ter and a separate u set of

2:10:38

uh projects by sort of just asking lots

2:10:41

of questions of the consultant group and

2:10:44

studying their website.

2:10:47

So during more intrusive discovery which

2:10:51

isn't in this um to get the storm water

2:10:53

we did see some other work that they did

2:10:56

which is on a separate project that we

2:10:58

were eyeing up which is something that

2:11:00

you guys want to talk about which we'll

2:11:02

talk about second. Um so notable on

2:11:06

their website uh they have did some work

2:11:10

at the Frank elementary school and

2:11:13

Baltimore the Shelby uh community park

2:11:16

and there's elementary school. So, some

2:11:19

are Maryland and then some Philadelphia

2:11:22

um or one Philadelphia. They have a lot

2:11:24

of experience in different areas. They

2:11:26

also have a um team in Pittsburgh. They

2:11:30

have a team in Philly and team in

2:11:32

Baltimore.

2:11:37

Some of the strong alignment with the

2:11:38

project goals uh for the urban space. Um

2:11:42

one thing that's not on there, it is a

2:11:44

womanowned company.

2:11:47

And then we really thought that these

2:11:50

two sites were very successful.

2:11:56

This is a picture of Hamilton Elementary

2:11:58

School.

2:12:00

And then there's there's more of a

2:12:01

breakdown on our website on how they

2:12:03

came to these projects just for more

2:12:05

insight as well.

2:12:09

This one's a pretty tight space. This is

2:12:12

actually a lot smaller than 15th of

2:12:13

Vernon, but this just gives a little bit

2:12:16

of mental insight of how the team was

2:12:19

sort of thinking about 15th of Vernon,

2:12:22

like how we can really max out all of

2:12:24

it. Not just the way we think of it, but

2:12:27

maybe how they might think of it mixed

2:12:29

in with how the community wants it.

2:12:35

Uh so for this scope essentially this is

2:12:38

to help us with the the grant

2:12:40

application. It's part of the DCMR

2:12:43

application process.

2:12:45

Um consultant gave different budgets. Uh

2:12:49

theirs was actually the lowest. Um it

2:12:52

also includes uh surveying which we

2:12:55

traditionally hadn't done at this phase

2:12:57

but we found that we kind of need to do

2:12:59

that up front um because this will

2:13:02

minimize some issues that we've had um

2:13:05

beyond the planning stage and

2:13:06

implementation. Sometimes we skip that

2:13:09

and then we do it later and then ends up

2:13:12

messing up some of the ideas and

2:13:14

concepts.

2:13:17

One thing we do know is what we for this

2:13:19

one we'd have to have community

2:13:21

involvement also as part of the DCMR

2:13:24

process which includes at least two

2:13:27

meetings for the community.

2:13:38

>> Okay. I was waiting for your I didn't

2:13:40

know I was going to ask. Okay. Thank

2:13:42

you. Um,

2:13:47

I don't have any questions right now on

2:13:49

this exact um, project. Um, the

2:13:53

slideshow did help with um, some of the

2:13:55

questions I may have had. I think more

2:13:58

so I'm just looking forward to seeing

2:13:59

what they do, making sure we stay on our

2:14:02

timeline. Um, because I know a lot of

2:14:05

residents have had questions and I've

2:14:07

contacted both of you with emails about

2:14:10

um, the parks that are currently being

2:14:11

updated. are we going to meet the

2:14:13

deadlines, what the extensions are

2:14:14

looking like. So, I think just making

2:14:16

sure we're staying in um which I know

2:14:19

we're saying compliance with those, but

2:14:21

um from the perception it was is we

2:14:23

weren't, which is why a lot of people

2:14:25

had questions with are we going to meet

2:14:27

that? Do we so we don't have to give

2:14:29

money back. So, I think just making sure

2:14:31

we stay with these timelines, keeping us

2:14:34

updated to make sure because we know it

2:14:36

can be hard work with updating

2:14:37

playgrounds and you can't really do it

2:14:39

in the winter time.

2:14:41

Um, I think my biggest, so it kind of

2:14:45

does go with this project. Um, but not

2:14:48

but it does because I think one of the

2:14:51

things I want to make sure is we have

2:14:52

benches under our pavilions. Um, as we

2:14:55

are going to update this playground and

2:14:57

the other ones that we are one thing

2:14:59

that I've noticed throughout the

2:15:00

playgrounds in the city and I think I've

2:15:02

at least I spoke to you, Mr. Saunders

2:15:04

about it is just I've been to many

2:15:06

playgrounds where there are no benches

2:15:08

under the pavilions or there's just one

2:15:10

bench but it's out in the sun and I mean

2:15:13

I don't want to be cooking while

2:15:14

watching my kids play. You know, I would

2:15:16

like some type of shade. Um and so I

2:15:20

think like just making sure that that is

2:15:23

there. Um I think thinking about what

2:15:25

the residents want um is important. Like

2:15:28

you said, you're going to be having the

2:15:29

two community meetings. So, um, like I

2:15:32

said, I don't particularly have any

2:15:33

questions. Just making sure as we're

2:15:35

going through this process. We're making

2:15:37

those playgrounds in a space where, um,

2:15:40

people can sit, participate, but most

2:15:44

importantly is what the residents are

2:15:46

asking for um, or trying to come to some

2:15:49

type of compromise. They can't get

2:15:51

everything, but like how can we meet

2:15:53

them in the middle? Um, and just one

2:15:55

last thing and then I do want I know my

2:15:57

colleagues have questions. Um, I don't

2:16:01

know what it looks like for I hope we do

2:16:04

get some spray park systems. That's

2:16:07

since I've been on council that's like a

2:16:08

big thing for me. Spray pad, spray park,

2:16:12

like another place where residents can

2:16:16

be near water, can play in water.

2:16:19

Everybody's not going to go to the pool.

2:16:21

Um, so I think as we update these

2:16:23

playgrounds and Vernon Street, just

2:16:25

thinking about that concept, which I did

2:16:27

see one of the pictures up there, I know

2:16:29

it wasn't our park, but showing how um

2:16:32

Teter does work with small areas and I

2:16:34

saw that that was one of the things that

2:16:35

they had there. Um, so, you know, just

2:16:38

just making sure that that is um a part

2:16:42

of a plan or at least thinking of it.

2:16:45

Um, so I'll start down to my far right

2:16:47

with um, Councilwoman Lawson. Do you

2:16:50

have any questions?

2:16:53

>> Thank you, Chair Ross. Um,

2:16:55

>> the I think the slide may have answered

2:16:58

it. I saw the the budget of of 19,000,

2:17:00

but then I see deliverables are the

2:17:02

plans basically. U, uh, we're we're

2:17:04

we're paying them for the, uh, the

2:17:06

concept at this point, and we'll get a a

2:17:10

larger budget, I I suppose, once we get

2:17:12

that plan straightened out. Um you did

2:17:16

note that they were the the lowest uh

2:17:19

cost. Was that the reason for the

2:17:21

selection or or was it for their overall

2:17:23

work?

2:17:24

>> Uh in this mode we what we kind of got

2:17:28

into was who we think can deliver us the

2:17:33

concept the best way for the grant

2:17:35

application. And that and then if

2:17:38

everything works out and we get the

2:17:40

grant, we would potentially go back with

2:17:42

them. You don't have to, but ideally you

2:17:45

want to go back to this. We're using

2:17:48

utilizing them for a service right now

2:17:50

to help us develop our grant and provide

2:17:53

concepts there. That way, they're not

2:17:55

looking like we just drew them, but

2:17:57

they're actual concepts that would go in

2:17:59

the park. I think there is getting

2:18:01

community feedback and things like that.

2:18:04

Actual designs. They're not the final

2:18:06

designs or anything like that at this

2:18:07

phase, even when they're done. That

2:18:09

would come after we got the grant

2:18:12

approved. We have money to change up

2:18:15

those things.

2:18:16

>> Okay. And then you you did get them

2:18:18

because you like their work product and

2:18:20

not just because they were the lowest

2:18:21

cost. That's correct.

2:18:22

>> Yeah. We actually really weren't focused

2:18:24

on their cost. Okay. At all. We really

2:18:26

focused on what we thought they could

2:18:28

what group could do the best.

2:18:30

>> Okay. Great. Thank you very much. That's

2:18:32

that's exactly what I wanted to know.

2:18:33

>> Thank you.

2:18:35

>> All right. Uh Councilwoman Green,

2:18:38

>> thank you very much. I don't have any

2:18:39

questions.

2:18:41

Vice President Jones.

2:18:43

>> Thank you. Thank you guys for your

2:18:44

presentation. Um I know Councilwoman

2:18:46

Ross uh pretty much touched on it, but I

2:18:49

would ask you to expound on um the

2:18:51

timelines. Um I'm talking about the

2:18:53

parks in general from 7th Reservoir. Um

2:18:57

I know when the one time you guys came

2:18:59

in front of us, um we were kind of

2:19:00

pushing it and again if there was an

2:19:02

extension just so the residents can

2:19:04

actually hear that process.

2:19:07

>> Sure. So for that project um 7th and

2:19:11

Rner Gorgus Reservoir Park and um Wilson

2:19:17

Park we did have an another extension

2:19:19

till for 33 of 2026

2:19:24

and that's recent.

2:19:25

>> Okay.

2:19:26

>> Um we realized that we weren't going to

2:19:29

finish um for a variety of reasons. Um,

2:19:33

reservoir's still going to have some

2:19:35

issues finishing. Um, but we do think

2:19:38

we'll be able to get

2:19:39

>> no clawbacks. No clawbacks.

2:19:41

>> Yeah.

2:19:42

>> Outside of reservoir, I I can't really

2:19:44

speak to things. Okay.

2:19:45

>> Is very um difficult.

2:19:48

>> Yeah. Uh my other question is with the

2:19:51

Vernon Street project, um you know, that

2:19:53

that design looked pretty good. My

2:19:56

concern is the streets, Vernon Street

2:19:58

itself, the one coming out of

2:20:01

>> Mayflower. You talking about the alley?

2:20:03

>> The alleyway definitely for sure. That's

2:20:05

you know Axel Bendon Road there. Uh

2:20:10

>> coming out of Hamilton Health Center.

2:20:13

That that one too. That's 15th is it?

2:20:15

>> Yeah,

2:20:16

>> that would No, that'd be 15 17th. Yeah.

2:20:19

So just surrounding that area, are we

2:20:21

working with public works to to pave

2:20:23

those areas once this project again? I

2:20:25

mean it should have been done honestly

2:20:27

but um because people actually utilize

2:20:29

that space and I know this isn't your

2:20:31

question. I'm I mean for you for your

2:20:33

department but I'm asking are you guys

2:20:35

collaborating or looking at that along

2:20:38

with this project because I think that

2:20:39

would be an issue so people can safely

2:20:41

pull up drop kids off and you know

2:20:46

>> we can talk to John Watson about that

2:20:48

stuff. Okay.

2:20:49

>> It's it's twofold. Um, so on the road

2:20:54

where the alley is, the walkway has been

2:20:56

washed away for about 10 years. So the

2:21:00

wall that's at the park, we installed a

2:21:03

wall in 2017

2:21:05

and brown this actually late December of

2:21:08

that year and part of it starting to to

2:21:11

give. So if some of the storm water this

2:21:15

that would come into play here is taken

2:21:16

care of, they'll actually

2:21:19

should level the road off some, not but

2:21:23

also more of a consistent flow of water

2:21:27

so it's draining correctly. And if you

2:21:29

look at the um the grate that's out

2:21:32

there with the um the sewer, the

2:21:34

lateral, some of those things need fixed

2:21:36

and then the cross works need fixed. So

2:21:39

these are things that are could be fair

2:21:41

game. It's just they have to sort of

2:21:43

kind of come into the inclusivity part

2:21:46

and access going over to Hamilton.

2:21:49

um could play a role, but it's really

2:21:51

going to be road to road as opposed to

2:21:53

Hamilton Health. There's no walkway over

2:21:55

there.

2:21:56

>> No, I'm just saying just

2:21:58

>> but all it's all one thing. It's not

2:22:00

like they're you're trying to make the

2:22:02

road safe, but you're also trying to

2:22:04

storm water at the same time.

2:22:06

>> So, I understand that like the the

2:22:08

dynamics may not seem that way, but that

2:22:10

alley you need everything needs to be

2:22:12

tightened up.

2:22:13

>> Well, that's that's pretty much

2:22:16

>> but we have to make From a grant

2:22:18

standpoint, it has to make grant sense

2:22:20

for the park, too.

2:22:21

>> Right. But that's why I was asking is

2:22:23

there going to be You said you would

2:22:24

talk to Mr. Watson. Yes.

2:22:26

>> Right.

2:22:27

>> That's it.

2:22:27

>> We're going to try to make it into the

2:22:28

grant. So the covers

2:22:30

>> Well, I mean, we have our own equipment.

2:22:31

So, we can we can do some black topping

2:22:33

over there. So, you know,

2:22:35

>> a little more in black top.

2:22:36

>> I know. I mean, you you got Yeah, you

2:22:37

have deep holes over there.

2:22:39

>> Oh, yeah.

2:22:40

>> So, yeah. I don't know. I was just

2:22:41

asking a question. It didn't really fall

2:22:43

on you guys' department. And I was just

2:22:44

hoping we were thinking about this

2:22:45

because it's been a bad area for some

2:22:48

time.

2:22:48

>> Thank you.

2:22:48

>> I'll make sure it's on radar.

2:22:50

>> Thank you. I know.

2:22:51

>> You mean the old road? Not just by the

2:22:53

park.

2:22:53

>> N Yeah. Yeah. That whole square right

2:22:57

there is bad.

2:22:58

>> All the way up.

2:22:59

>> Yeah.

2:23:00

>> Yes.

2:23:00

>> All right. To 15th, 14th. Thank you.

2:23:04

>> Yeah. Gotcha.

2:23:06

>> And do you have any questions, President

2:23:08

Hill?

2:23:09

>> Um, yes. Thank you. So, in reference to

2:23:11

resolution two, I'm excited to see I I'm

2:23:14

hopeful that um the plan that will be

2:23:17

developed will be great. I like the

2:23:20

images that I saw from the other cities

2:23:23

and I like that there are at least two

2:23:26

community meetings built in um on behalf

2:23:29

of DCNR. So, I think that's exciting. Um

2:23:33

in reference to resolution three of

2:23:36

2026, I asked Mr. McCutchen earlier. Um,

2:23:40

can you speak to the pool improvements

2:23:43

funding or the limited amount that was

2:23:46

expended so far on phase one?

2:23:49

>> Yes. So, we're still waiting for the

2:23:52

consultant to finish a scientific study.

2:23:54

Okay.

2:23:54

>> At um Paul all manner.

2:23:57

>> Um there

2:23:59

after talking to Lamont, there did seem

2:24:02

to be some goofy things that he said

2:24:04

come correct. So, we've had some things

2:24:06

go down. So, we were waiting for the

2:24:09

scientific study to be a little bit more

2:24:11

expanded upon with um there's like some

2:24:14

brown water and um we don't necessarily

2:24:18

it's not like sinkhole, but we just got

2:24:20

to make sure that we can actually build

2:24:22

a pool there.

2:24:23

>> Okay.

2:24:23

>> So, those things sort of kind of went a

2:24:26

little stagnant after our last council

2:24:28

visit.

2:24:28

>> Oh, I see.

2:24:29

>> Waiting for the team to get back to us.

2:24:31

>> Okay.

2:24:32

>> Was delayed a little bit.

2:24:33

>> When do you anticipate

2:24:36

um So

2:24:37

>> hearing back from them maybe the during

2:24:39

the first quarter

2:24:41

>> it'll be in the first quarter.

2:24:42

>> Okay.

2:24:42

>> Um our every other weekend or Thursday

2:24:45

every other week or Thursday. So the

2:24:47

last Thursday they had to go out and do

2:24:49

a little bit more work.

2:24:50

>> Okay. Okay.

2:24:51

>> We are we are really probing them. It's

2:24:54

not just us as facilities. We're we're

2:24:56

all on the same call. We're really

2:24:57

probing.

2:24:58

>> Okay.

2:24:58

>> Can we or can we do it? So it slowed us

2:25:00

down. We had steam and we sort of lost a

2:25:03

little steam. So

2:25:04

>> Okay. Okay. Well, I hope we reboot and

2:25:07

get some more steam there. And then my

2:25:09

final question is around the other

2:25:11

programs, the extension that was granted

2:25:14

until March 3rd.

2:25:16

>> Um, do you believe that that is a

2:25:18

reasonable

2:25:20

deadline at this point? Do you

2:25:22

anticipate an additional request of an

2:25:25

extension or

2:25:26

>> We don't anticipate another request. We

2:25:28

we have went as far as we could at

2:25:30

things weather related. Um it's a kind

2:25:34

of a daily conversation. Um we are

2:25:36

meeting with one of the vendors

2:25:38

specifically each week to sort of go

2:25:41

faster. Um they did they're out there

2:25:43

working now. They they were a little bit

2:25:45

behind but they may have slowed down

2:25:47

some of the other groups from being able

2:25:50

to complete their work. So while we got

2:25:53

that extension that will help us get us

2:25:56

closer to 95% across the board. Um

2:25:59

there's one concern that we just might

2:26:02

not be able to do a playground on time

2:26:04

of March 3rd.

2:26:06

>> Okay.

2:26:06

>> Not saying it won't get up in March.

2:26:08

This won't be open up on March 3rd.

2:26:10

>> Okay.

2:26:10

>> Yeah, I do think we'll get done with

2:26:12

just the dates.

2:26:14

>> Okay. Well, thank you for the updates. I

2:26:16

don't have any other questions.

2:26:19

>> Thank you, President Hill. Uh,

2:26:21

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:26:23

>> Uh, thank you both for joining us this

2:26:25

evening. Um, I have no questions. just I

2:26:28

get very happy when any work is uh being

2:26:31

looked to do on Allison Hill. Sometimes

2:26:33

it's overlooked and um not saying it's

2:26:36

due to anyone intentionally doing that.

2:26:38

It's just the way the grant processes

2:26:40

work. Sometimes they identify more

2:26:42

pertinent areas what they deem more

2:26:44

pertinent. So anytime work um is being

2:26:46

done for the families of Allison Hill,

2:26:49

South Allison Hill, it's just, you know,

2:26:50

a joyous occasion. So I look forward to

2:26:52

seeing the park, you know, um fulfilled

2:26:55

and completed. I grew up on 16th in

2:26:57

Chestnut, so you know, I got a lot of

2:26:59

bumps and bruises right there on that

2:27:01

street. So, um, I look forward to seeing

2:27:03

it and thank you both for your work.

2:27:08

>> Uh, do you have any questions,

2:27:09

Councilwoman Davis?

2:27:11

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Thank you

2:27:13

both for being here this evening and

2:27:16

thank you for everything that you're

2:27:17

doing to upgrade our parks and make them

2:27:20

safe. Um, I'm thinking about

2:27:24

this particular playground and I believe

2:27:27

if my memory serves me correctly,

2:27:31

the

2:27:33

perimeter around the playground,

2:27:36

especially right there where that alley

2:27:38

is, there's nothing there right now. Am

2:27:42

I correct?

2:27:44

>> H,

2:27:45

>> there's um homes there.

2:27:47

>> No, the alley. the alley behind I mean

2:27:50

right there alongside of the playground

2:27:53

like there's not a fence or a wall or

2:27:56

anything there. I don't think

2:27:58

>> there's a wall.

2:27:59

>> So you said the wall is

2:28:01

>> the wall. Okay. Is there

2:28:03

>> and then there's a wall and then there's

2:28:06

like steps.

2:28:07

>> Okay. And but you mentioned the wall is

2:28:09

falling down.

2:28:11

>> Yeah. It's gonna it's was it wasn't

2:28:14

temporary but we got about 10 years out

2:28:16

of it.

2:28:17

>> Okay. Yeah. I was just trying to

2:28:18

remember. I do remember going through

2:28:21

that area and saying to myself, "Oh,

2:28:26

someone could easily go on that

2:28:28

playground while the children are

2:28:30

playing or the children could easily

2:28:32

drift away from the playground just

2:28:34

because that area right there by the

2:28:37

alley wasn't secure."

2:28:41

Um, so again, I'm just I haven't been

2:28:46

over that way in that alley in a while,

2:28:49

but I do remember thinking that and

2:28:52

wondering if the kids were safe. That's

2:28:54

all. Just from So, will this grant cover

2:28:57

a new wall or a new fence?

2:29:01

>> Yeah. So, the the grant for the grant

2:29:05

application here is to start building

2:29:08

towards a bigger project.

2:29:09

>> We're not going to be able to go get one

2:29:11

grant. We're going to need multiple

2:29:12

grants.

2:29:13

>> Um it's not a project that we anticipate

2:29:15

being done in in um like 24 months or

2:29:19

anything like that. We do expect it to

2:29:20

probably take about three years

2:29:22

>> to get the funding for this project.

2:29:25

>> Yeah. So just because of the traffic

2:29:27

that goes through that alley there and

2:29:29

all the cars that drive through there,

2:29:31

I'd like to see that whole side secured

2:29:35

so no one can go up on in that

2:29:39

playground and the children can't branch

2:29:41

out into the street into the alley while

2:29:44

they're chasing their ball or

2:29:46

>> so that's my only concern with that

2:29:48

playground. But thank you very much for

2:29:50

all that you do and that's it for me,

2:29:52

Councilwoman Ross. Thank you. And there

2:29:56

was one more question.

2:29:57

>> Oh, you do you have

2:29:59

>> It's not a question. It's just kind of a

2:30:00

clarification. Um as far as what

2:30:02

Councilwoman Davis was talking about

2:30:04

>> on the street that is Mayflower Alley,

2:30:06

there are not houses directly across.

2:30:08

It's where it runs right behind um

2:30:10

Hamilton Health Center.

2:30:12

>> So you're not crazy. There is a section

2:30:14

without houses. Um right and there's

2:30:16

like shrubbery there. And then the other

2:30:18

portion does have houses and then it's

2:30:20

the other street.

2:30:22

There is a section with the wall that I

2:30:24

believe is crumbling along Mayflower

2:30:26

Street that doesn't have houses that I

2:30:28

think you were speaking to. Yes, it's

2:30:30

Mayflower Street,

2:30:31

>> right? Thank you.

2:30:32

>> Like part of the park has fencing and

2:30:35

then the other part other part does not.

2:30:37

>> I I thought so. And um again, I'm just

2:30:40

concerned that the kids could just, you

2:30:42

know, be chasing their ball. It run the

2:30:45

ball goes out in the alley. It's just

2:30:46

not secure on the alley. There's a lot

2:30:48

of foot traffic that goes through there

2:30:51

and also cars speeding through there.

2:30:55

So, I was just thinking of safety and

2:30:57

hopefully that this grant could cover a

2:31:00

a wall, a fence or something that could

2:31:03

make sure that the kids are safe within

2:31:06

the playground.

2:31:07

>> So, thank you again for all you that you

2:31:10

do.

2:31:12

>> Thank you. Thank you both. Um, and Vice

2:31:14

President Jones, you had a question.

2:31:17

>> Yeah. Um, I've been meaning to get get

2:31:19

with you guys about this because I keep

2:31:21

getting um inquiries about uh the flat

2:31:24

top of Reservoir Park. Have there been a

2:31:26

study up there? People have been worried

2:31:28

about this thing crumbling down up there

2:31:30

by the Civil War Museum.

2:31:34

>> You have to talk to Joe about that. That

2:31:36

city engineer. Okay. I I did do not to

2:31:39

cut you off anybody off but about not

2:31:42

this budget but the last budget um I had

2:31:45

went out in the summertime with Joel. We

2:31:48

went up to the flat top. We even had a

2:31:50

company come out and I asked them to get

2:31:53

um a quote done to see how much would it

2:31:56

cost because it is tilting. It is

2:31:59

falling. It's scary to stand there and

2:32:00

look down. It's going right behind

2:32:02

McDevit. So I understood the concern.

2:32:06

Um,

2:32:07

I believe they had said that the Civil

2:32:09

War Museum may have had a grant, but

2:32:13

then I even spoke to uh, Solicitor

2:32:15

Grover and um, they didn't know if they

2:32:18

had a grant. It was a whole thing, but

2:32:20

then it was not even put in the budget

2:32:22

as a project because they said it was

2:32:25

said that it's not crumbling yet. So, I

2:32:29

know Councilman Jones left, but whoever

2:32:31

else needed that. So, it's not important

2:32:34

at the moment. So that's that's what I

2:32:37

got on it. So um I don't know.

2:32:42

So any other questions, concerns? Okay.

2:32:46

No, you're welcome. I would um please

2:32:50

add resolution two of 2026

2:32:53

um to our next legislative agenda. And

2:32:56

that's it for Parks, Recreation, and

2:32:59

Enrichment Committee. Thank you both for

2:33:01

coming tonight and giving us

2:33:02

information. Enjoy your evening. Oh,

2:33:05

wait, one more thing. I am so sorry. Can

2:33:07

you please send all of us the slides?

2:33:09

Thank you so much.

2:33:12

>> Thank you. We will move forward with our

2:33:14

meeting agenda. Next, we have public

2:33:17

comment. Just a few housekeeping notes

2:33:19

before we begin. Uh, please state your

2:33:22

name and your address for the meeting

2:33:24

record. If you don't feel comfortable

2:33:26

sharing your address, please share the

2:33:28

vicinity in which you live within the

2:33:30

city. You will have four minutes to

2:33:32

share your comments. Mr. Humphrey has

2:33:35

added a timer to the screen for your

2:33:37

reference. I will begin to my right. Is

2:33:41

there anyone that would like to offer

2:33:42

public comment?

2:33:44

Okay, seeing and hearing no one. Anyone

2:33:46

in the middle section?

2:33:53

>> Good evening, council members. My name

2:33:55

is Ca Rain, resident of Steel Barrow.

2:33:58

Um, as you all know, I was here last

2:34:00

week on the topic of ICE. Um,

2:34:05

today I'm coming again about the

2:34:07

subject, but not of my own view, but

2:34:10

that of my partner's experience in all

2:34:13

of this. I would like to take a moment

2:34:15

to thank Councilwoman Green for bringing

2:34:17

this up when the police department was

2:34:19

here. I do appreciate that. Um, but I do

2:34:22

have a letter from my partner who is

2:34:24

currently at home terrified to even

2:34:27

answer the front door because of what's

2:34:29

going on in the country right now.

2:34:33

So, my name is Aaron Rain. I have not

2:34:36

left my house since January 10th when

2:34:38

ICE first arrived in Harrisburg. I was

2:34:40

born in this country at Franklin Square

2:34:42

Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. That

2:34:44

does not stop people from asking me

2:34:46

where are you from and assuming I'm a

2:34:48

Hispanic immigrant. During the Baltimore

2:34:51

ice raids in 2018, I hid in my house

2:34:53

with other members of the community who

2:34:55

looked like me because an American

2:34:57

citizen named Richard Garza, sorry,

2:34:59

Ricardo Garza, had already been detained

2:35:02

by ICE and had been detained for 38 days

2:35:05

even though he was a legal citizen. It

2:35:07

also does not matter that I am a mixed

2:35:09

race black man, as Germaine Thomas, who

2:35:11

was born on US soil on a United States

2:35:13

military base, was deported to Jamaica

2:35:15

on May 28th of last year.

2:35:18

I fled to this state after the literal

2:35:20

KKK chased me out of West Virginia after

2:35:23

protesting and writing a petition for

2:35:25

police reform during the Black Lives

2:35:27

Matter protests. I came to the city

2:35:29

because Harrisburg is so diverse and

2:35:31

welcoming to all. Now, I'm asking the

2:35:34

city that I've lived in for several

2:35:35

years to keep constituents like me and

2:35:37

others safe from ICE agents who

2:35:39

repeatedly break the law and detain

2:35:40

legal citizens. I would like to go I

2:35:43

would like to leave my house to go

2:35:45

grocery shopping, go to doctor's

2:35:46

appointments, and take my family out for

2:35:48

fun. I cannot do that under the threat

2:35:50

of wrongful detainment. I urge the city

2:35:53

to stop allowing ICE to go into

2:35:54

government buildings without a warrant

2:35:56

signed by a judge. I want local laws

2:35:58

preventing ICE from going into

2:36:00

businesses, hospitals, and places of

2:36:02

worship without a warrant signed by a

2:36:05

judge. I want local police to pledge to

2:36:08

stop working with ICE when they are

2:36:09

under no obligation to. Thank you for

2:36:11

your time and I hope to see you soon.

2:36:14

Following that, I would like to speak

2:36:16

more on recent experiences of American

2:36:20

citizens around the country as things

2:36:21

have been happening.

2:36:23

The terror that ICE has been bringing

2:36:25

doesn't just affect the unlawful or the

2:36:27

undocumented as they've gone into

2:36:29

communities arresting peaceful

2:36:30

protesters who are simply exercising

2:36:32

their first amendment rights. Pulling a

2:36:34

disabled woman from a car is seen on

2:36:36

January 13th in Minneapolis. They've

2:36:39

detained legal citizens like uh I'm

2:36:41

going to butcher this name and I do

2:36:42

apologize. Uh Doulsece Consuelum Diaz

2:36:46

Morales in Maryland, a US citizen who

2:36:48

was held for 25 days unlawfully because

2:36:51

of her name and skin color despite the

2:36:53

evidence presented of her citizenship.

2:36:55

There was also a New York City Council

2:36:57

employee who is as of this moment

2:36:59

unnamed to protect the privacy um that

2:37:01

is in the article as well. um but is in

2:37:04

the United States on a visa to live and

2:37:06

work here through October of 2026

2:37:09

and

2:37:10

was detained and sent to a ICE facility

2:37:14

in New York. The New York City Council

2:37:16

has not been able to get a hold of them

2:37:17

for any information as well.

2:37:20

And as recently as this morning when a

2:37:23

man named Chong Lelay Thao was pulled

2:37:26

out of his home in Minnesota in subzero

2:37:28

temperatures in just his underwear in

2:37:30

front of his daughter-in-law and his

2:37:32

four-year-old grandson and detained by

2:37:34

ICE who refused to see his ID because

2:37:36

they alleged that he matched the

2:37:38

description of two known sex offenders

2:37:40

that they also alleged live there

2:37:41

despite publicly available registries

2:37:43

documenting otherwise. This man was

2:37:45

driven out to the middle of nowhere,

2:37:47

photographed, and then asked for his ID,

2:37:49

which he didn't have because they had

2:37:51

declined seeing it while he they were

2:37:53

detaining him. In this instance, at the

2:37:55

very least, he was released after a few

2:37:57

hours of wrongful custody and drove back

2:37:59

to his home, still in only his underwear

2:38:01

and the blanket.

2:38:03

So, I do know I'm just about over my

2:38:05

time, but I do ask you, honorable city

2:38:07

council members, to pass a resolution to

2:38:09

prevent ICE operations in the area

2:38:11

without a judicial warrant signed by a

2:38:13

judge in businesses, residencies, places

2:38:16

of worship, or medical facilities so the

2:38:18

people of this beautiful city can

2:38:21

breathe just a little easier. Thank you.

2:38:24

And that's my time.

2:38:27

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else in the

2:38:29

middle section that would like to offer

2:38:30

public comment?

2:38:37

Good evening to the council. My name is

2:38:39

Kia Fowler. I am a new homeowner on

2:38:41

North Fifth Street as of Wednesday. So,

2:38:43

I'm very excited to be here. Thank you

2:38:45

very much. Um, I grew up here in York

2:38:47

County. Well, not Dolphin County, but

2:38:49

grew up in York County. Um, I've been

2:38:50

very privileged my whole life. Grew up

2:38:52

middle-ass family. Never had any

2:38:54

concerns. Obviously white, so I've never

2:38:55

actually had to worry about a lot of the

2:38:57

things that um, majority minority people

2:39:00

worry about. I have had the privilege of

2:39:02

being an immigrant. So even though I was

2:39:04

born here in the US, I immigrated to

2:39:06

Australia for a couple of years um and

2:39:08

was there during a lot of t turmoil. So

2:39:10

I am familiar with a lot of the fears

2:39:12

that a lot of immigrants have when it

2:39:13

comes to interacting with not only

2:39:15

hostile civilians but when it comes to

2:39:17

law enforcement as well. Um many many

2:39:19

immigrants are just here whether they're

2:39:21

documented or not are just here trying

2:39:22

to make a better life for themselves. Um

2:39:24

and are so afraid to step even a toe out

2:39:27

of line because the repercussions that

2:39:29

could happen. Uh it's been really

2:39:30

dismaying to see the actions of ICE in

2:39:33

our communities and I think the c thank

2:39:35

the council members uh for their

2:39:36

comments when the police officers were

2:39:38

here about their focus on keeping

2:39:40

Harrisburg residents safe. Um I really

2:39:42

really really want to make sure that if

2:39:44

something like Minneapolis comes to

2:39:45

Harrisburg that the residents documented

2:39:47

or undocumented are all being protected.

2:39:49

I would really urge the council to look

2:39:51

at passing um some kind of law

2:39:53

resolution um just to prevent 287G from

2:39:58

being enforced here in Harrisburg. Um I

2:40:00

would really like to see the focus on

2:40:02

local police protecting citizens and not

2:40:05

cooperating with ICE as much as

2:40:06

possible. Uh we've seen many many

2:40:09

instances of ICE in Minneapolis and

2:40:11

Minnesota at large violating people's

2:40:13

due process rights. Uh various other

2:40:15

constitutional rights. Um, we've seen

2:40:17

citizens being injured. Um, not to

2:40:20

mention that a lot of ICE were so much

2:40:23

when it comes to the Renee Good

2:40:24

situation. Some of these issues with

2:40:26

with ICE creating dangerous situations

2:40:28

in order to do what they want was so

2:40:30

bad. Then 2014, um, that law was passed

2:40:33

telling officers they could not step in

2:40:34

front of cars, in order to be allowed to

2:40:36

use lethal force. Um, we've seen a lot

2:40:38

of ICE officers u just acting with

2:40:41

impunity uh wearing face masks, hiding

2:40:44

and I would hate to see the residents

2:40:47

scared to come out of their own homes.

2:40:48

Um, this city is so amazing because of

2:40:51

its diversity. I am Jewish and so I love

2:40:53

being up here where I can see people of

2:40:56

various ethnicities, faiths, religions,

2:40:58

languages all interacting and bringing

2:41:01

such a vibrancy to this community. and I

2:41:03

just don't want to see any of that

2:41:04

impeded uh by this lawlessness that

2:41:07

keeps happening. I thank you very much

2:41:08

for your time and I would really hope

2:41:10

that you consider preventing the

2:41:12

enforcement of 287g. Thank you.

2:41:17

>> Thank you.

2:41:18

Is there anyone else in the middle

2:41:20

section that would like to offer public

2:41:21

comment? Okay, seeing and hearing no

2:41:23

one, anyone to my left.

2:41:32

Good evening, council prophet chestnut

2:41:35

between 20th and 21st. Um, I understand

2:41:40

this ICE issue, but we have to keep in

2:41:42

mind that the president did say

2:41:44

effective February if we do um become a

2:41:49

sanctuary city that we will lose funds.

2:41:52

So, um, consider that. You don't want to

2:41:56

what they say, bite off your nose to

2:41:59

please your finger, right?

2:42:01

Um, I'm an immigrant. I've been in

2:42:04

America since 1983. That's 40ome years.

2:42:08

I've been in Harrisburg. I left Germany

2:42:11

in 2007. So, I've been in in Harrisburg

2:42:14

since for 19 years. The point is it is

2:42:19

difficult.

2:42:21

But if our residents came into the

2:42:24

country illegally, then that is a crime.

2:42:30

ICE are federal agents.

2:42:33

Their jurisdictions

2:42:35

is federally not by the city. If the

2:42:39

individual have come into the country

2:42:42

via visa, whether it's a F visa, a B

2:42:45

visa, you know, they will have something

2:42:48

called a I94.

2:42:51

This is a entry document.

2:42:54

If they overstayed

2:42:57

their time,

2:42:59

then that is a civil, not a criminal,

2:43:03

and they won't get the same type of

2:43:05

penalties. Now, if you do want to help

2:43:08

your

2:43:11

visitors that are in here without um

2:43:17

justification,

2:43:19

if they have a I94,

2:43:22

then we can try to move them towards

2:43:25

agency that can help them,

2:43:30

you know, to become legal. But to become

2:43:33

a sanctuary city is not a good move.

2:43:36

You're going to lose your fundings.

2:43:38

You're actually acting against your

2:43:40

parent. And your parent being the

2:43:42

federal government is not a good move.

2:43:45

Um, and yes, the Megan the the goods and

2:43:50

and and there's a lot of things going

2:43:51

on, but you know, if you jump in front

2:43:53

of a car, an ICE agent, a armed officer,

2:43:56

and you go, I mean,

2:44:00

that they're they're justified. There

2:44:03

are a lot of things that they're doing

2:44:04

that is very justified. And if you go

2:44:07

ahead and you allow these criminals

2:44:12

to control the city and come and cry and

2:44:16

listen,

2:44:17

if you're a citizen, then you have no

2:44:19

problem. If you're not a citizen, yeah,

2:44:20

you have a problem. But ain't nobody

2:44:23

want nobody in their backyard

2:44:25

unless they're invited. So don't go, you

2:44:29

know, coming here crying.

2:44:32

We're not in the Holocaust. This is not

2:44:34

a slavery movement. Stop using other

2:44:37

terrible things to justify what is going

2:44:40

on right now. And this is just a simple

2:44:44

federal agents trying to conduct their

2:44:46

jobs. Thank you.

2:44:50

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:44:52

left that would like to offer public

2:44:54

comment?

2:45:04

Good evening. My name is Melanie Cook. I

2:45:07

am a resident of the city of Harrisburg

2:45:09

and I have been for most of my life. I

2:45:11

live in the 3000 block of North Third

2:45:13

Street. This wasn't where I was going to

2:45:15

begin, but let me begin by saying that I

2:45:17

do not live in pre-Nelson Mandela, South

2:45:21

Africa, and will not be producing

2:45:23

identification unless it is warranted.

2:45:26

The second point is if we are talking

2:45:28

about if you are not invited here you

2:45:30

should leave most of us in this room

2:45:32

would be gone. I am of silige Cherokee

2:45:35

descent um and I can assure you we would

2:45:37

like North Carolina and the southern

2:45:39

states back. We have to be aware um that

2:45:43

there is a process under which that has

2:45:45

existed in this country for many years.

2:45:48

Not to age myself, but in 1980 I was an

2:45:51

intern at a select congressional

2:45:54

committee on immigration and refugee

2:45:56

policy. The document is out there. I

2:45:58

suggest you try to read it all of you.

2:46:00

Trash bill relief. Um while there was

2:46:03

discussion of the two approximately 292

2:46:06

properties that may have received uh

2:46:08

compensation, well not compensation, uh

2:46:11

a walk to date, um there was no

2:46:14

information as to how much money um has

2:46:17

been written off. Um I as a citizen

2:46:19

would like to know um how much money is

2:46:22

in the pot and how much money has been

2:46:25

excused to date. Uh, with respect to the

2:46:28

project at 1332 North Second Street, I

2:46:31

do want to commend the city council

2:46:34

members, particularly um, Miss Ross RS

2:46:38

uh, for her pointed questions and

2:46:40

looking out for the existing tenants.

2:46:42

When these new projects come in, we want

2:46:44

to applaud them, but there are five

2:46:46

people at least who have been living in

2:46:48

these buildings, no doubt, for many

2:46:50

years. and very easily it could be

2:46:53

flipped in a way that they would be out

2:46:55

and what they are required to pay would

2:46:58

be um increased greatly. I also commend

2:47:01

uh President Hill for her question with

2:47:04

respect to what is making you produce uh

2:47:06

28 affordable units and note that the

2:47:09

response was we have been educated by

2:47:11

others about the feasibility of

2:47:13

affordable units. All of you or most of

2:47:16

you who have been sitting here should be

2:47:18

commended for the work you've done. the

2:47:21

pressing pressing pressing about

2:47:22

affordable housing. It is not going to

2:47:25

happen overnight. They are not going to

2:47:27

do it unless there's something in it for

2:47:29

them. And you are all to be commended

2:47:32

for the work that has been done, the

2:47:34

demonstration that these projects can be

2:47:36

done in this city. They're aesthetically

2:47:38

pleasing and they provide much needed

2:47:41

housing. Um, a point I would like

2:47:44

clarification on is at the end of his

2:47:47

presentation he slipped in that they

2:47:50

will be pursuing tax abatement 100%. The

2:47:54

question that I have is this property is

2:47:57

owned and the units are going to be

2:47:58

rented. So the 100% residential

2:48:02

abatement would apply to whom? to the

2:48:05

property owner who would not be paying

2:48:07

the tax uh because the renters wouldn't

2:48:11

be assessed to tax. And the question I

2:48:14

would have is how much of the rent um

2:48:16

has been factored in for a tax that they

2:48:19

may not pay. Now, it's one thing to say

2:48:21

we're collecting 20,000 8,000 whatever

2:48:24

he said. Um but if they're getting 100%

2:48:27

tax abatement, then presumably they're

2:48:30

not paying anything. Um with respect to

2:48:33

the project at PA Clinic, I as many of

2:48:36

you know have worked in a number of

2:48:38

fields. Um one of which was a

2:48:40

governmental affairs for building and

2:48:42

developing industry. I can say

2:48:45

definitively that the developer for that

2:48:48

project, Pinark Holding, is one of the

2:48:51

most impressive people I have ever seen.

2:48:53

And those of you who know me know I do

2:48:55

not blow smoke. um they have come in and

2:48:59

offered and done things that I have not

2:49:03

seen many developers do. I implore you

2:49:07

to use them as a model for how the city

2:49:11

wants to see these projects develop

2:49:13

going forward because they are showing

2:49:16

you they are including people. They are

2:49:19

genuinely listening to comments that the

2:49:21

public makes and I implore you implore

2:49:23

you to follow up.

2:49:25

>> Thank you, Miss Cook. Yeah.

2:49:28

And again, we need a whole separate

2:49:31

thing on this situation with ICE.

2:49:36

>> Thank you.

2:49:38

Is there anyone else that would like to

2:49:40

offer public comment? I don't want to

2:49:42

miss anyone. Okay. Seeing and hearing no

2:49:44

one, I did want to respond um regarding

2:49:48

the trash bill forgiveness program. So,

2:49:51

Antonio, as I mentioned when we were

2:49:53

talking, um, did share the updates as of

2:49:57

December 11th, 2025.

2:50:00

So, bear with me. Um, he shared a trash

2:50:05

bill forgiveness program tracker. So,

2:50:07

I'll share those numbers, but he noted

2:50:10

then that we have $913,967.97

2:50:18

remaining in the program. The phase

2:50:20

three list of residents includes 575

2:50:24

residents and is currently being

2:50:26

reviewed by the administration to ensure

2:50:28

there are no employees, elected

2:50:31

officials, landlords, and businesses on

2:50:34

the list. Our goal is to mail out

2:50:37

letters with applications to the

2:50:38

qualified residents by December 19th,

2:50:42

2025.

2:50:43

There will be a timeline stated in the

2:50:46

letter of 15 days of for applications to

2:50:49

be returned. However, due to the

2:50:51

holidays, he anticipated um the ongoing

2:50:55

of a minimum of 15 business days. Um he

2:51:00

noted that they are going to communicate

2:51:02

the exact date and the date that they're

2:51:05

mailed um to council and that would

2:51:08

begin the phase three. So he's going to

2:51:11

provide another update of this tracker

2:51:13

when phase three is complete. So we have

2:51:20

a program overview

2:51:22

and the phase one total forgiven was

2:51:25

$835,37530.

2:51:31

Phase two total forgiven was

2:51:34

$250,656.73.

2:51:42

For a phase 2 overview, the total number

2:51:45

of churches that received of this

2:51:48

forgiveness were 20. Um total accounts

2:51:53

26 total contacted 16%

2:51:58

contacted 80%.

2:52:01

Total attended 9156%

2:52:05

attended 91530%.

2:52:09

Amount forgiven again that was

2:52:11

$250,656.73.

2:52:17

The total potential forgiveness is

2:52:20

$265,126.81

2:52:25

for a percentage forgiven of 94 uh.54%.

2:52:33

For a phase 1 overview, there were 536

2:52:39

um total mailings. Uh the total received

2:52:43

was 268.

2:52:45

So the percent received was 50%. The

2:52:49

total forgiven 835,37530.

2:52:58

The total potential forgiveness

2:53:00

1,531,53689

2:53:08

percent forgiven 54.54%.

2:53:14

The largest forgiven was $8,534.

2:53:21

The smallest forgiven was $77125.

2:53:27

The largest possible forgiveness

2:53:30

uh is $9,5365

2:53:36

and the smallest possible is $3557.

2:53:42

The number that were not returned uh was

2:53:46

211.

2:53:47

The number of bad returns was 57. The

2:53:51

number of landlords 21.

2:53:54

And the number of demoed were four. So

2:53:58

I'll repeat all of these numbers again

2:54:02

um during our legislative session. That

2:54:04

way they are included uh with the

2:54:06

meeting record. And perhaps Antonio, am

2:54:10

I permitted? Are we permitted to share

2:54:11

this? So as I review it, everyone can

2:54:14

view it.

2:54:16

>> Okay.

2:54:20

>> Oh, okay. Didn't have that one, but the

2:54:23

as of December 11th. So we have another

2:54:26

update um as of January 9th. So I will

2:54:28

share that next week, but I did want to

2:54:30

note that you pre previously provided

2:54:32

that. So thank you.

2:54:34

>> If there's no further discussion, any

2:54:37

>> Yes, Councilwoman.

2:54:39

>> Thank you. I was going to ask if that

2:54:41

information could be put on the website.

2:54:44

>> Not sure.

2:54:45

>> I'm not sure. I know that we can share

2:54:47

it during our meeting.

2:54:49

>> We can place it on e-codes.

2:54:50

>> So, okay.

2:54:51

>> Under miscellaneous documents, so it can

2:54:53

be viewed there.

2:54:54

>> Great. Then everyone will have access to

2:54:55

it, but we will review it again. So,

2:54:57

thank you.

2:54:58

>> Thank you.

2:54:58

>> Um, the time is 8:37 p.m. I will

2:55:02

entertain a motion to adjurnn.

2:55:04

>> Is there a second?

2:55:05

>> Second.

2:55:06

>> Thank you. We stand adjourned.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free