Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council - Work Session 4/15/25

1:12:07EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
0:29

[Music]

0:52

[Music]

1:03

[Music]

1:10

[Music]

1:30

[Music]

1:50

[Music]

2:12

[Music]

2:19

[Music]

2:30

[Music]

2:41

Mr. Trudeale, could you please call the

2:43

role?

2:48

Miss Daniels.

2:51

Miss Davis, present.

2:54

Miss Green, present. Mr. Jones, here.

2:58

Miss Rolls,

3:00

present. Mr. Rodriguez, present. Miss

3:03

Bowers, present. Thank

3:05

you. Uh, we are going to go a little bit

3:09

of out of order. As you heard,

3:11

Councilwoman Daniels hasn't joined us

3:14

yet. Uh so we are going to begin with

3:17

the business of the public safety

3:20

committee. I will defer to our public

3:22

safety committee chair, Councilman

3:27

Jones. Thank you, President Bowers. Um

3:31

so we have Mr.

3:34

Luff, our legal here, uh representing

3:37

the administration,

3:41

the right. Yes, Jonathan Love.

3:47

Okay, go ahead. My apologies. Assistant

3:51

city solicitor.

3:54

So, what we have here

3:56

is resolution 20 of

4:00

2025. This is the

4:03

resolution approving the submission of

4:05

the petition for the Pennsylvania Liquor

4:07

Control Board. There was a map that

4:11

was already

4:13

uh in place. This ordinance had ran out

4:16

as of January of this year and so we are

4:20

um continuing it for another five years.

4:24

Open it up for any questions.

4:27

So explain that part again. So you're

4:29

saying the one that you have now as it

4:31

stands as resolution 20 they're looking

4:34

to extend that for another five years.

4:37

Correct. So the actual noise ordinance

4:40

was from 2020 until 2025 and it ran out

4:45

January of 2025 and so we are looking to

4:48

extend that from 25 until 30 for another

4:51

5 years.

4:53

Good. Good. Um, so for me, um, you know,

4:56

the last work session that we had, I'm

4:58

going to just again say that I'm going

4:59

to be looking to make an amendment to

5:02

revert this map back to um, resolution

5:05

85 of 2017 for that same extension. And

5:09

with

5:11

that, Yep.

5:16

Yeah, that's what they're so correct.

5:19

What Jared is handing out right now is

5:21

the map of 2017.

5:24

along with the description of the

5:26

boundary of what it was in 2017, which

5:28

is what I believe uh Councilman Jones

5:31

what you had asked for. Yes.

5:34

So, I'll let my colleagues take a look

5:36

at the map

5:38

first. And if you guys can um I don't

5:41

know if you had a chance or if you

5:42

looked over what the what they were

5:44

proposing for resolution 20 of 2025

5:48

where the map was cut off at Forester

5:51

Street and I'm looking to Yes, sir.

5:55

doing our legislative um to bring this

5:57

back

5:58

to 85

6:00

2017.

6:02

So, you guys pretty familiar?

6:05

Councilwoman Davis, Vice President

6:08

Green. All right. So, what I'll do right

6:10

now is um I don't have any questions. Uh

6:13

it's pretty clear what what I'm asking

6:15

and I'll open up the floor to my

6:17

colleagues to see if they have any

6:18

questions and I'll start to my immediate

6:20

right. Uh Councilman Rodriguez. Thank

6:23

you, Chair Jones.

6:25

Um, do you feel from a legal perspective

6:28

there'll be any challenges or

6:30

discrepancies from any local businesses

6:32

or residential areas uh outside of the

6:35

map or directly outside of the map? Like

6:37

has there been any contention thus far?

6:39

None that I know. It would be kind of

6:40

hard to hard to guess or speculate, you

6:43

know, who would outside of this map have

6:46

issues, but nobody reached out. No, not

6:48

as far as I am aware. I believe

6:50

Councilman Jones um the reason why he

6:53

wanted to extend it to this map is to

6:56

encompass those businesses who have

6:58

reached out specifically to him. Yep.

7:00

Okay. No further questions for me. Thank

7:02

you, Councilwoman Ross. Uh thank you, um

7:06

Councilman Jones, and good evening.

7:08

Thank you for being here today to

7:09

present this um for us, Mr. Love. Um, I

7:13

just want to know uh the residents who

7:15

are online to know the process of what

7:17

will happen um with the amendment that

7:19

Mr. Jones is making with the public um

7:22

comment just so they know what's what's

7:24

coming up um when it comes to um their

7:27

voices being heard about what they think

7:29

about the map um being amended.

7:32

Absolutely. So there will be actually

7:34

two times to where the public can uh

7:37

come and make comment. You guys have to

7:39

vote on this. Uh so they would be

7:41

allowed to come to that legislative

7:42

session and make comment on this as well

7:44

as once it gets passed by city council.

7:48

Then it goes uh the liquor control board

7:51

will have their own uh public meeting

7:54

and it will be held right here. So

7:57

they'll have two chances right here in

7:58

this building to come and make comment

8:00

and they can let the liquor control

8:02

board know specifically the same way

8:05

they can come to you guys.

8:08

Thank you for telling us about the

8:09

liquor control board being here. I did

8:10

not know they would be a part of the

8:12

meeting as well. Um so that's that's

8:15

helpful to us and to the public. So um I

8:18

just want to clarify they actually have

8:20

their own P. So it won't be you guys

8:22

have one and then then they have one

8:24

separately. We're there just Okay.

8:27

Gotcha. Okay. So they would need to go

8:30

to both meetings to express their if

8:32

they need to I should say. So, when the

8:35

um liquor control board has their

8:37

meeting, will that be posted on our

8:39

website? Like, how will residents know?

8:41

Okay, the liquor control board is having

8:44

a meeting that deals with um businesses

8:46

that are in my area about this map being

8:49

amended back to what it was. How will

8:51

they know? Do you know how they So, it's

8:53

going to be publicly

8:54

um yes, the same sunshine act. Okay. So,

8:58

we would have to put that out there.

9:01

Okay. Thank you. That's all the

9:02

questions I have. I mean, I know that um

9:05

previously, and correct me if I'm wrong,

9:08

these businesses uh were a part of the

9:11

noise control ordinance and then they

9:13

were cut out of the noise control

9:15

ordinance and that's when it got amended

9:17

to um so first it was what it was in

9:19

2017. They were a part of it. Then there

9:22

was some type of change where they were

9:24

cut out. So now we're basically just

9:25

restoring to what it was in 2017. Would

9:29

that be correct? That's correct. Okay.

9:31

Thank you. I just want to make sure that

9:33

nothing happened that

9:37

um that they were cut out that can't

9:41

answer why it changed in 2017. I don't

9:44

know, but I can tell you that this is

9:46

what it was in 2017. It did in fact

9:48

change and now it is going back to what

9:52

it originally was, which I think is

9:54

important to know, right? I don't know.

9:55

I don't remember anything happening, but

9:58

um I don't think a lot of people knew it

9:59

changed either, except the businesses

10:00

that were affected. So, that's all my

10:03

questions, concerns, and um knowledge

10:06

for the public. So, that's it for me.

10:08

Thank you. Uh President Bowers, thank

10:11

you. Um I just have two questions. I

10:15

wanted to

10:17

um know if we could please review the

10:20

the new boundaries or the former

10:22

boundaries. I guess that would be um

10:25

included in the amendment just so

10:27

everybody's aware

10:30

where it was cut off at Foster and where

10:32

it's going to go back to in 2017 if I'm

10:34

correct. Yes. You want me to put it like

10:37

on I have it exactly where it was before

10:41

as far as the description. I have the

10:43

description as to what it's changing

10:45

to. See if I have the written

10:47

description as to what it was. Okay.

10:50

Just want to be clear so everybody knows

10:52

the And do you want me to read it onto

10:54

the record as to what it was? Yes,

10:57

please. Just so everybody can hear

10:59

because everyone can't see um what we

11:02

have. Not a problem. Okay. So it

11:05

was beginning at a point being the

11:08

center of the intersection of Forester

11:10

and North Street. Then s southerntherly

11:13

along the center line of Northfront

11:15

Street to midpoint of the former

11:17

Cumberland Valley Railroad tracks. Then

11:20

easterly along the center line of the

11:22

former Cumberland Valley Railroad tracks

11:24

to the Harrisburg Transportation Center.

11:27

Then northerly along the eastern

11:29

boundary of the Harrisburg

11:30

Transportation Center to the center of

11:32

Market Street. Then westernly to the

11:35

eastern lot boundary of Tax Parcel

11:38

092

11:39

031 known as Fifth Five North Fifth

11:43

Street. Then northernly and

11:46

westernly following the lot boundary of

11:49

five North Fifth Street to the center of

11:51

North Fifth Street. Then northerly along

11:54

the center line of North Fifth Street to

11:56

the center of the intersection with

11:58

Walnut Street. Then east easterly along

12:02

the center line of Walnut Street to the

12:04

center of the intersection with North

12:06

Seventh Street. Then northerly along the

12:09

center line of North 7th Street to the

12:12

center of the intersection with Forester

12:14

Street. Then westerly along the center

12:17

line of Forester Street to the center of

12:18

the intersection with North Front Street

12:21

being the place of end.

12:24

Thank you. And then my second question

12:26

is I know um in previous discussion

12:32

uh we weren't clear on the number of

12:36

businesses that would be impacted. So I

12:38

just wanted to know if there were any

12:40

updates there as far as the I just want

12:44

to make sure I understand your question.

12:45

Are you asking how like how many

12:48

businesses are impacted by it changing?

12:51

Yes.

12:52

I do not have that answer off the top of

12:54

my head. Okay. So, so what it was, what

12:56

they did show is a um we looked at a map

12:58

of all of the licensed um businesses

13:01

that had liquor licenses in the area and

13:03

it's quite a few. It's it's a pretty

13:06

large number. I'm sure there are more

13:08

than there were in 2017 because other

13:11

businesses have emerged since then.

13:14

Absolutely. But if again from looking at

13:16

the map that you so graciously put

13:18

together um it was uh other businesses

13:22

that have liquor license but will not

13:25

weren't included in the original map and

13:26

will not affect them either way. Okay.

13:30

Okay. Thank you. And I can say that

13:32

there we did actually start with

13:34

everybody who has a liquor license in

13:37

within the city of Harrisburg and I can

13:39

and I can show this to you as well. This

13:41

is where we started from. Okay.

13:46

Thanks.

13:50

Okay. Thank you. I don't have any other

13:52

questions.

13:54

Vice President Green. Thank you,

13:56

Councilman Jones. Uh, thank you for

13:58

being here tonight. I don't have many

14:00

questions. Um, just the first question I

14:02

have is how many complaints did we get

14:04

or did we get any complaints um of

14:06

establishments that were part of the old

14:10

map that we were looking to originally

14:12

extend? And I would my answer to that

14:14

would be back at the last session I

14:17

believe I can't remember exactly how

14:18

many he said but he uh

14:22

officer you weren't here can't remember

14:25

his name off the top of my head right

14:27

now but he had a number of complaints

14:30

but he he said that he didn't have them

14:33

broken down as to uh noise complaints

14:35

specifically for the liquor. It was just

14:39

general noise complaints. Right. So, I

14:41

wasn't sure if we had gotten that

14:42

information and if not, can we get that

14:44

information so that we can, you know,

14:46

just I mean, general noise complaints

14:49

doesn't really do us any any good.

14:50

That's just like noise complaints in the

14:52

city of Harrisburg and I can probably

14:54

name a hundred of them that never got

14:56

responded to, so they probably aren't

14:58

documented. So, um the ones that are

15:00

specific to the establishments with

15:02

liquor control licenses, I think, um

15:05

will be pertinent. And then um even if

15:07

we can get a list of what those

15:08

establishments were so we can see which

15:10

ones would be affected um by the new map

15:13

were not affected. I think that would be

15:15

helpful for me. Um just you know just

15:17

for knowledge purposes. Um and this went

15:20

into place in 2019. Correct. This map

15:23

that 2017

15:25

no the old map the one that we're

15:27

currently looking to extend went into

15:29

place in 2019 was voted on in 2019 and

15:32

went into effect by the liquor control

15:33

board in 2020. 2020. Yes. Yeah. It ran

15:36

out in 17, right? And then 18 it was

15:39

redone. No, you're talking about the one

15:40

that you're trying to tell about the new

15:43

one. Okay, I got So, technically, we're

15:45

talking about this map, but the

15:48

residents don't have a copy of this map.

15:49

The residents don't know anything about

15:51

this map. The legislation that we're

15:52

talking about is I got you. So, I just

15:55

want to I'm asking questions about the

15:57

legislation that is before us so that we

16:01

can then talk about the amendment at the

16:04

legislative session. Um, which, you

16:07

know, I understand what we're looking to

16:09

change it to. I just want to have the

16:10

information on what it is now. Um,

16:12

because then it can help inform our

16:13

decision on why it might be good to

16:15

change it to that. Um, also, I know

16:18

that, um, Solicitor Grover did note that

16:20

the liquor control board wasn't happy

16:22

with the zigzaggy map. Um, is this map

16:25

too zigzaggy, do you think, for the

16:27

liquor control board with the way that

16:29

it's extended up and through the city?

16:31

It is the map. I thought so. Um, and are

16:35

we looking to make We want anyway. I

16:39

know we won it. Um, but did they have

16:43

any recommendations?

16:45

They

16:48

wanted easy more more to the one that

16:52

you see on resolution 20. Right. Right.

17:07

It's for this

17:09

office city.

17:12

City

17:29

Council and please

17:39

don't for Extending these kind of things

17:43

into the

17:44

neighborhood a whole

17:46

different

18:03

city up front.

18:13

All right. I completely agree with you.

18:14

I was just asking as far as when it

18:16

moves to the next level um what some of

18:19

the obstacles that we might face are. Um

18:22

and then I had another one. You said you

18:25

do have a copy of the establishments

18:27

that we can get a copy of. Mr. Trust. Um

18:30

that was my other

18:32

question. And I think that pretty much

18:35

sums it up. That's it. Thank you,

18:38

Councilwoman Davis. Thank you,

18:40

Councilman Jones, and thank you for the

18:42

updated map. I would like a copy of the

18:46

um establishments also. Thank you, Mr.

18:49

Trudale. And um in reference to the

18:53

residents,

18:55

how can they file a noise ordinance

18:59

complaint?

19:00

Or if an establishment is making too

19:03

much noise in the middle of the night,

19:05

what do they do?

19:07

Well, I mean it if they're within this

19:10

area, I would say it would be the same

19:11

thing to make any kind of complaint.

19:13

You're going to

19:13

call you're going to call the help the

19:16

police 911 make a complaint and they

19:19

will allocate it however they allocate

19:21

it at the time depending on what that

19:23

person tells them.

19:25

Okay. And how can they follow up if the

19:29

noise is from an establishment to make

19:32

sure that their complaint was addressed?

19:36

I would say they should follow up in

19:38

their normal course of if depending on

19:40

who they're complaining to. If they're,

19:41

you know, they want to come down and

19:42

speak to city council, they can do that.

19:44

If they want to go to the the control

19:46

board, they can do that. Um there's it's

19:49

really going to be kind of up to them

19:50

and how they decide what they're saying

19:53

and what they're looking for.

19:56

Okay. And do we have a time frame for

20:00

when the liquor control board will be

20:02

meeting? Do we know any of those dates

20:06

or I know nothing will happen until we

20:08

actually fill out the application packet

20:10

and send it to them. And that won't

20:11

happen until we have a resolution passed

20:13

from you guys. So, it's just a that

20:16

would be step two of the process, the

20:18

liquor control board. Once you guys uh

20:21

vote and pass it, then we'll get that

20:23

ball moving.

20:25

Thank you.

20:27

And Miss Daniels isn't here, right?

20:29

Okay. Well, thank you. Oh, she is. Oh,

20:32

apologize. Uh, Councilwoman Daniels.

20:40

All right. Thank you. All right. Thank

20:42

you. Uh, that concludes the work session

20:45

of public safety and I would ask that

20:48

this um resolution be moved to our next

20:50

legisl legislative session and I would

20:53

ask my colleagues to vote in favor.

20:56

Thank you.

20:58

Thank you.

21:01

We will go backwards on our agenda and

21:04

move forward with committee business uh

21:07

with the community and economic

21:09

development committee. I will defer to

21:11

our committee chair, Councilwoman

21:13

Daniels, to lead discussion.

21:17

Thank you.

21:32

Resolution 21, 2025, a resolution

21:35

approving the preliminary/final lot

21:37

consolidation and land development plan

21:39

to construct a new city of Harrisburg

21:41

parks maintenance facility on site. The

21:44

existing nearby facility at 901 North

21:47

12th Street will be demolished as part

21:49

of a larger project redeveloping SRTA's

21:52

operations and maintenance facility at

21:54

901 North Cameron Street, which will

21:57

include the vacation of public right

22:00

ofway and consolidation of lots in the

22:02

block to the south and associated site

22:04

and access improvements.

22:21

as far uh good evening. This is Oh, I'm

22:24

sorry. Oh, go ahead. I wasn't aware

22:26

anybody else was here.

22:29

Uh Bill Schnore with Stantech. We're the

22:31

uh consulting engineer uh for the the

22:35

overall project. The plan that's before

22:38

you uh right now is the new parks

22:41

maintenance facility that would is

22:43

proposed at the corner of her street and

22:46

Cameron Street and

22:49

uh Rich Var and SRTA and and the other

22:53

members of the team were before council

22:56

about a month ago explaining the overall

22:58

larger project. This is the first phase

23:02

uh to construct a new park maintenance

23:05

facility and uh to be able to uh proceed

23:09

into the larger SRTA operation and

23:12

maintenance facility which would

23:14

demolish the existing parks maintenance

23:17

facility.

23:31

I guess for

23:44

me

23:50

tonight,

23:53

but our rel

24:04

That work is done. Our relationship will

24:06

be such that we will come to

24:10

you at no cost.

24:34

Mr.

24:41

probably

24:52

uh I'm not quite sure where you're going

24:54

with that, Rich, but uh

24:58

well uh perhaps perhaps I can take over

25:01

a little. Uh this is Jeffrey Knight,

25:03

playing director. Um so uh the South

25:08

Regional Transportation Authority which

25:09

is uh is the owner of all of these of

25:13

the subject properties involved in this

25:15

particular um application. Uh they own

25:19

most of the properties in the block

25:21

bounded by Hurst Street to State Street

25:23

and Cameron Street to the Harrisburg

25:25

Cemetery. Uh and in that general area

25:28

you have um Sunshine Park, you have the

25:30

existing parks maintenance facility

25:32

which is just to the south of that. uh

25:34

which is behind where the good goodwill

25:36

campus is uh right on Cameron Street and

25:38

then just to the north of that uh is um

25:41

uh Certa's existing uh operations and

25:44

maintenance facility. Um and so this is

25:47

really kind of a bit of musical chairs

25:50

which is why the project is described as

25:52

it is. uh the first step of which uh and

25:55

is uh the construction of a new parks

25:58

maintenance facility at the corner of

26:00

her street and Cameron Street on

26:02

properties that are owned uh by uh

26:05

Serta. Um and so because Serta owns most

26:08

of the properties in this um project and

26:10

because their larger in this block and

26:13

because their larger uh project is

26:15

really driving this first phase of the

26:17

development, they're kind of operating

26:18

as the master developer for this and

26:20

therefore they were the applicant on

26:22

this particular application. Um once

26:24

they're able once the uh new facility is

26:27

built at this location, um they will

26:31

then be able to demolish our existing

26:33

facility just south of Sunshine Park. uh

26:35

which will be part of the footprint of

26:38

their uh new operations and maintenance

26:40

facility that will consolidate uh some

26:42

of the some of um the agency's

26:44

operations and staff into this site uh

26:47

and will replace the the Goodwill campus

26:50

right there. And the reason they're

26:52

doing it in this uh uh sequencing is

26:55

because they need to have uh access to

26:58

the existing operations and maintenance

27:00

facility uh the cat barn uh you may know

27:03

it as uh throughout this whole thing so

27:05

they can keep the system running and

27:06

keep the system moving. Uh so once

27:08

they've developed that new facility then

27:10

they'll be able to demolish uh the

27:12

existing one. Um so this is really the

27:14

first phase in that like multi-sequence

27:16

project. Uh and again because cat or

27:18

serta owns most of these properties um

27:21

they're kind of functioning as the

27:22

master developer for this overall

27:24

project.

27:36

So the city owns you know structure uh

27:39

so the city owns sunshine park uh and it

27:42

owns this existing the land that it

27:44

existing facility is on just to the

27:45

south. Um but once this project pardon

27:49

me yes uh and uh but once this facility

27:53

is complete um as I think um Mr. Schro

27:57

was saying the uh SERTA will hand over

28:00

this land on which the facility is built

28:02

to the city. So they will be selling I

28:05

guess the land to us um once this

28:08

facility is complete and then we I guess

28:11

as part of that transfer and again I

28:12

don't know the exact um you know process

28:15

by which this will occur but uh we will

28:17

then be selling like our land that the

28:19

existing facility is on to SERA for them

28:21

to do their larger project.

28:40

And Rich can correct me if I'm wrong.

28:42

This is Neil Grover, but basically

28:44

there's a series of entities involved in

28:47

this process. It's very long. It's very

28:49

detailed. and numbers of uh documents

28:54

will come back to the council over time

28:56

because any land transfer or land

28:58

acceptance is a legislative function. Um

29:02

this is being driven by there there's

29:04

professionals who are in place who have

29:06

been put in place for the overall plan

29:08

and the order of events matters for cert

29:11

to be able to build this effectively. So

29:14

early in this process is getting our

29:16

this other building that we're in taken

29:18

care of and the land transferred because

29:21

of the complexity we have talked

29:23

repeatedly about simplifying the legal

29:26

process not doing every single piece you

29:28

know separately but as the overall plan

29:31

there's streets involved here there will

29:32

be roads opened roads closed in this

29:35

what I consider maybe others disagree

29:36

like a twob block square block area so

29:39

that so the whole map of it will come

29:41

back and the rights of it will come back

29:42

in a series the documents to council

29:44

just like it'll come back to the board

29:45

at Certa. You know, there's a lot of

29:47

approvals that have to happen along the

29:49

way. There's been a lot of approvals

29:50

that have happened to date to get it

29:52

this far along, but there but the but to

29:54

take every one of them and do them one

29:56

at a time would just slow the track

29:58

down, you know, from how we're doing it.

30:00

So, there's been a lot of back and

30:02

forth, but but the finals aren't final,

30:04

if that makes any sense yet, until you

30:06

really get into some of the the the uh

30:09

actual construction and laying of

30:11

foundations and those things. That kind

30:13

of detail will keep coming. So, it will

30:15

keep coming through the city for a

30:16

number of years till this gets final.

30:18

I've lost track of what the end date is

30:21

where they hope to be done all the

30:22

construction. Um but but it but this

30:25

process that is about $150 million

30:28

project all in. So it's got a lot of

30:30

moving parts and a lot of regulators to

30:32

satisfy along the way. And so there's

30:34

been a lot of effort to satisfy those

30:36

regulators at different levels. So but

30:39

there will be packages that come back to

30:40

the council once this moves with

30:43

specific meets and bounds and things

30:44

like that. But it's it's hard to do it

30:46

on the front end, right? The original

30:48

plan was rejected, you know, and then it

30:50

sort of started over again. So So it has

30:52

to get to its final point. So this is

30:54

the beginning of a process from I think

30:56

a legal point of view.

31:01

So any

31:24

the city building will be built first.

31:27

the new one and with that built for us

31:30

to take over then the city building that

31:32

exists which is the park and rec

31:33

maintenance will come down right so that

31:35

they're replacing our building to let

31:37

their overall footprint work. So um we

31:41

are benefiting on the front end from a

31:42

new facility uh and they so they can

31:45

keep it moving. It's important to

31:47

remember that the city and what CERTA is

31:50

it's a it's a regional transportation

31:52

authority. The city has appointed voted

31:54

seats on that board. So the city is in

31:57

this process through its representatives

32:00

on, you know, a monthly basis that

32:02

they're there as well as the

32:03

representatives of the other

32:04

municipalities that are

32:17

involved.

32:30

Sure. Uh, I'll just finish giving the uh

32:34

Yeah, I'll just uh finish giving the

32:37

planning bureau's um case report uh of

32:39

the planning commission's discussion and

32:41

resolution and then I'll hand it over to

32:43

the applicants to uh fill in many gaps

32:46

that they feel is necessary. Uh so again

32:48

as I as I noted this is the first step

32:50

in a a multi-phase process. Uh the

32:52

existing um footprint of where this site

32:55

will be is five individual parcels. Um

32:58

and it basically includes a canopy of a

33:01

former gas station at the corner of her

33:03

and Cameron Street. Just behind that is

33:06

a restaurant that used was most recently

33:08

for Aces. Uh and then behind that

33:10

there's a larger industrial building

33:12

that has had a variety of autooriented

33:14

uses over time. Uh most of this site is

33:18

uh paved. Um it's frankly uh in various

33:22

states of dilapidation. There's

33:24

overgrown weeds. Uh so overall the

33:27

project is going to uh have a

33:30

significant improvement um to this

33:32

really um conspicuous corner uh in the

33:35

city here at the corner of her and

33:37

Cameron Street. Uh there will be um

33:40

on-site storm water management

33:41

improvements done as part of this. Uh

33:43

there will be two uh different buildings

33:46

uh for the parks maintenance facility.

33:48

Uh and if and it's going to be it's

33:50

going to significantly modernize uh both

33:52

the um facilities for parks maintenance

33:55

staff uh and also the operations. And if

33:57

you've ever been in the existing parks

33:59

maintenance building, uh last time I was

34:01

there was like you know February and it

34:02

was cold inside like it's probably not

34:04

weather weatherproofed or climate

34:06

controlled. So, uh, this new building,

34:08

uh, will, you know, really raise the

34:10

standard of, um, of the city's

34:12

facilities, uh, with respect to this,

34:14

uh, particular department. Um, uh, in

34:18

addition to that, uh, there will be some

34:21

changes to the right ofway around the

34:24

site. Uh, right now there's some curb

34:26

cuts onto Hurst Street. Uh and although

34:28

there's not a lot of traffic to and from

34:30

these sites, um there is some and

34:32

because of the uh multiple curb cuts

34:35

along her street and their proximity to

34:37

the intersection with Cameron, uh it can

34:39

get a little hectic with people going in

34:40

and out. Um there'll be a fence pretty

34:43

much up along the frontages of both her

34:46

street and Cameron Street as part of

34:47

this new development. Uh and all of the

34:49

vehicular access will come in off 12th

34:51

Street. Uh so it will really simplify uh

34:54

vehicular circulation to the site which

34:56

will make things safer for everybody. In

34:58

addition um they're going to improve and

35:01

widen the sidewalks along her and

35:02

Cameron Street. Um and that's not just

35:05

important from a general perspective but

35:08

uh because um Certa's new facility will

35:10

be located just to the south along

35:12

Cameron Street. people will be walking

35:13

along along Cameron Street uh to that

35:16

facility because there will be a

35:17

transfer point um at that building um

35:20

for certainly the the near-term and

35:22

maybe uh into the longer into the

35:24

future. Uh so it will be necessary to

35:26

have these um pedestrian improvements as

35:29

part of the overall project. Uh again,

35:31

the um condition of the site, the

35:33

appearance of the site will be improved.

35:35

And also uh because the site is located

35:37

in the um 100red-year flood plane, uh

35:40

the applicants are working um with FEMA

35:44

to on a letter of map revision uh

35:46

document to um essentially revise the

35:50

base flood elevation at this site and to

35:52

make sure that their new construction uh

35:54

is compliant with the city's

35:56

regulations. We require uh 18 inches

35:58

above the base flood elevation uh which

36:01

is called the freeboard uh in our zoning

36:02

code. And so the proposed letter of map

36:05

provision is going to reduce the base

36:07

flood elevation about 3 ft which

36:09

significantly you know changes the

36:11

construction of the building um the uh

36:13

uh financial feasibility of the

36:15

building. You have to do a little bit

36:17

less in terms of the overall um flood

36:20

plan flood flood proofing of the

36:22

structure and the site. Um, so with that

36:26

all being said, the planning commission

36:29

uh has recommended that the city council

36:33

approved the request with the following

36:35

conditions. Uh, the applicant must

36:37

secure approval of a letter of map

36:39

provision from FEMA so the development

36:41

can proceed as proposed and must

36:43

eventually receive approval for both the

36:44

structural demolitions on site as well

36:46

as the proposed new construction. And

36:48

again, the applicants are currently in

36:50

the midst of coordination with FEMA on

36:52

that. Uh the applicant should coordinate

36:53

with the city arborist to increase the

36:55

ecological impact and tree canopy on

36:56

site by incorporating native tree

36:58

species and pollinator plants

36:59

particularly on the western edge of the

37:01

site around the storm water detention

37:02

infrastructure which can also address

37:05

localized air pollution created by the

37:06

Cameron Street Hurst Street in uh

37:08

infrastructure. Uh and the city arburous

37:11

actually uh review is actually kind of a

37:13

new uh component we are doing with our

37:14

land development plans uh because we

37:16

have them on staff and we've generally

37:18

been including it as a condition of

37:19

approval instead of just always adding

37:21

that. Uh we've incorporated their review

37:24

uh as a formal step in the process just

37:25

like we do the codes bureau or the city

37:27

engineer. Uh so there are um actual uh

37:31

comments from our city arborist on maybe

37:33

how to improve the overall site, what

37:34

types of uh tree species to use and and

37:37

things like of that nature. and I

37:38

believe that was included in your

37:39

packet. And then finally, if possible,

37:41

the planning bureau recommends removing

37:42

the southernmost vehicular access point

37:44

onto the site from North 12th Street to

37:46

clarify vehicular circulation and

37:48

eliminate a vehicular pedestrian

37:50

conflict point, which is especially

37:52

important given the proximity to

37:53

Sunshine Park. So, in the initial

37:56

proposal, there were two um vehicular

37:58

access points. Again, this is across the

38:00

street from the park, but I mean, kids

38:02

will probably be running up and down

38:03

this street. And the more we can clarify

38:06

uh where exactly vehicles will be going

38:08

on in off the site and in fact reduce

38:10

the overall number of those access

38:12

points, the uh safer it will be for all

38:14

of the people um around this area. And I

38:17

believe the applicants at the planning

38:18

commission uh uh meeting agreed to that

38:21

condition. Uh the planning commission

38:23

recommended the city council approved

38:25

the request for the following reasons.

38:26

project will expand and modernize the

38:28

city's parks mainten maintenance

38:29

infrastructure, improving the ability of

38:31

the parks and recreation department to

38:33

provide services to residents and a

38:34

facility that creates better working

38:36

conditions for staff. The project site

38:38

is a conspicuous location at the

38:39

intersection of two state routes and the

38:42

removal of dilapidated and underutilized

38:44

buildings and replacement of large

38:45

expanses of impervious surface with

38:47

vegetation and a modern city building

38:49

will bring aesthetic improvements not

38:50

only for passers by but local residents

38:52

and workers as well. And finally,

38:54

through coordination with FEMA, the

38:56

project will result in a site that is

38:57

floodplane compliant and more resistant

38:59

to future flood events in the Paxton

39:01

Creek

39:10

corridor. The only thing I'd add is the

39:12

the layout of the uh site was

39:15

coordinated with the parks department.

39:17

Uh so there's a process of uh working

39:20

with them to determine the size of the

39:22

buildings, the number of buildings, and

39:24

there's a uh the main building is a

39:26

maintenance building with the admin

39:28

attached to to it with garage doors on

39:31

both ends of the maintenance buildings

39:33

to be able to pull, you know, trucks

39:35

with trailers on through the through.

39:37

And then uh also is a uh is a storage

39:41

building associated with it and you

39:44

know, sufficient parking and material

39:46

storage.

39:48

Once I

40:01

do this,

40:14

thank you, Councilwoman

40:17

Daniels, I don't have any questions. Um,

40:20

Neil and Mr. Knight, you pretty much

40:22

explained everything that's going to

40:25

take place and I understood clearly what

40:27

you were saying. I can appreciate that

40:30

the city arborists

40:32

uh governing the tree species and

40:34

everything around the site is going to

40:36

be involved with this and also that the

40:41

services are going to be increased for

40:43

the residents. I don't think there's any

40:47

bus services in that area currently.

40:50

So, being that it's centralized right

40:52

there in the middle of uh Cameron

40:55

Street, I'm just hoping that residents

40:58

could uh get a bus, go either in the

41:01

uptown area or the opposite direction.

41:03

That would just be a really nice feature

41:07

uh to this service. But thank you uh

41:09

everyone for uh being here tonight. And

41:12

thank you. That's all I have.

41:17

Thank you very much. Um I don't really

41:19

have many questions. Um it looks like um

41:22

a good opportunity for the city. Uh I've

41:25

I've been in that building um many years

41:27

ago and it needed to be upgraded then.

41:29

So I can only imagine that um the people

41:32

working there will be happy with the

41:33

upgrades and I can see that uh city

41:36

services will improve from it. So um I

41:37

don't have any questions about this

41:39

particular part of the project. Thank

41:40

you.

41:45

Thank you. I don't have any questions.

41:47

Many that I did have have been asked and

41:49

answered. Thank you.

41:53

Council Ross. Uh thank you, Councilwoman

41:56

Daniels. Um I don't have any questions.

41:58

Um I'm just a visual person, so I wish I

42:00

could see it in color. I know we saw the

42:02

new transit, I believe, the last time,

42:04

what that that may look like. So I just

42:06

wanted to see what the new parks and

42:08

wreck building would look like or what

42:10

the finished product would look like

42:11

once it was done. And I know it's not

42:12

going to be exact, but um but other than

42:15

that, no questions. I think it's of

42:16

course a good opportunity um for us to

42:19

upgrade those um areas in the city,

42:21

especially when it comes to

42:22

transportation and then the parks and

42:24

recreation um building. Plus, it's going

42:27

to take the eyes

42:28

away right there on Cameron Street cuz

42:31

those two buildings, the gas station and

42:34

um well, restaurant, but uh it's no

42:36

longer being used. So, um, you know, I'm

42:39

always there for us to take blight away.

42:42

So, that's fine. So, thank you. Thank

42:43

you for being here tonight.

42:49

Thank you, Madam Chair. Um, with Cameron

42:51

Street being a uh PennDOT own and ran uh

42:55

corridor, what role will they play in

42:57

this project? There are multiple uh HOPs

43:01

that will be required, highway occupancy

43:03

permits that'll be required for it. On

43:06

this particular one, uh there there will

43:09

be two, one for the sidewalk

43:11

improvements and the same HOP will close

43:14

the existing driveways on her street. Uh

43:18

and then there will be a separate one

43:20

that uh will be in the name of CRW and

43:24

uh we're working with them. They

43:26

actually will submit that HOP and that's

43:28

just for a simple uh uh storm sewer pipe

43:32

connection to an inlet out that charges

43:36

from the storm water basin. Okay. And

43:39

the Goodwill building that's across the

43:41

street, correct?

43:43

It's it's on the same same block. Yeah.

43:48

Is it on the

43:49

uh east side of Cameron Street, but that

43:52

would be across over by the gas station?

44:00

It it'd be on the opposite side. You

44:02

have the U corner that we're talking

44:04

about and then the Rabbit Transit or the

44:06

CAT facility and then it's right next to

44:09

the CAT facility. Yep. Okay. But you you

44:12

just you were bringing up Sunshine Park

44:13

which is actually across the street or

44:16

behind across 12. Yep. Across 12. Yep.

44:20

And then um just to echo what uh Chair

44:23

Daniels was saying, it would be good to

44:24

see some kind ofou because you know just

44:27

historically the city's gotten to

44:29

similar things throughout time and it's

44:31

kind of got messy and murky. You know

44:33

they promised this, they promised that.

44:35

Some kind of memorandum of understanding

44:37

probably would benefit if that is

44:39

doable. This way we don't in the long

44:41

run get caught in any murky business. Um

44:43

that's probably that would benefit the

44:45

city a great deal. But um I really have

44:48

no other further questions than that.

44:49

Thank you all. Thank you. Y

44:56

uh thank you Councilwoman Daniels. Um so

44:58

I have two two questions. Um on 12

45:01

Street that terrain is horrible right

45:04

now and you know summer spring is

45:06

getting here and you know a lot of our

45:08

residents are going to be utilizing

45:09

Sunshine Park. Is there any plan to pave

45:12

that road back there and if so what's

45:14

the timeline on that?

45:17

There there currently uh are no plans to

45:22

uh make significant improvements as far

45:25

as height because of uh the direction

45:29

that we received from the mayor's office

45:31

not to impact Sunshine Park. So Sunshine

45:35

Park is not being impacted if not the

45:38

not the park itself, the road on 12th

45:40

Street. you coming off of her and you

45:43

turn down in there. I'm sure you've been

45:45

back there. Yeah, that is horrible back

45:48

there. And it's been like that for a

45:49

very long time. And I'm just wondering

45:51

who's are we responsible for that? Are

45:54

you guys going to pave that road? I I

45:58

would currently the plans do not call

46:00

for resurfacing, but we certainly can

46:02

take a look at that. That would be

46:04

wonderful. I think it would save some

46:06

axle bending uh potholes. Well, and I I

46:10

would imagine you probably not want to

46:11

resurface it now because that will be

46:13

construction access for all the

46:15

demolition and construction if you got

46:16

you. But I'm saying if I mean knowing

46:18

that there's nothing there, but if

46:20

that's something that they consider and

46:21

again I was just wondering if it now

46:23

that we know that it's not there, I hope

46:25

you guys can some type of way put that

46:27

in your plans. Uh the other question

46:29

that I have again um solicitor Grover

46:32

mentioned $150 million project. I think

46:34

the total was 175 if I'm not correct. if

46:37

I'm correct in the end it would come out

46:40

to 175 million right the cost estimates

46:43

yes I think they're close to 150

46:47

uh yeah for the overall project I think

46:50

it's 150 all right then I seen 175 for

46:53

like total but either way 150 million is

46:54

a lot of money um what are we looking at

46:57

any um when you put out your RFPs how

46:59

are we connecting with some of the local

47:01

businesses here in the city of

47:02

Harrisburg I uh if you recall last month

47:06

when we were for council. Mr. Bar

47:09

uh indicated that they were planning on

47:12

like a uh a mixer with the uh you know

47:16

prime contracts and local contractors to

47:18

make that introduction and uh so that

47:22

they would plan to do that. Uh yeah,

47:25

that I think that would be um a great

47:27

idea. Um, again, when we're looking at

47:29

this kind of spending in the city, um,

47:31

would definitely be able to include, uh,

47:33

some of these local businesses and and

47:35

and that will help with some jobs here,

47:37

even though they're not the prime and

47:39

you sub, you definitely can, um, extend,

47:41

you know, some of that money right here

47:43

in the city. Um, so that's something

47:45

that I will be looking for um, moving

47:47

forward and then try to stick close to

47:49

you guys when it comes to that part. But

47:51

other than that, um I think this is a

47:53

great facility that's going to be built

47:54

and it definitely will turn some uh eyes

47:57

into something very nice to look at uh

48:00

moving around in that area. So, thank

48:02

you. No more questions.

48:06

Thank you. Are there any other

48:11

just a comment? Uh, Chair Daniels, um,

48:14

Dire Knight, you had mentioned the

48:16

importance of the sidewalks and making

48:19

sure those are not only ADA compliant,

48:20

but just, you know, um, appropriate for

48:22

the project. Just a side note, while we

48:24

have our engineer in the building, we

48:26

still have older communities like up on

48:28

State Street that don't have any

48:29

sidewalks. So, you know, somehow someway

48:32

if we can, and this is just like a

48:33

sidebar, if we can somehow someway kind

48:35

of figure that out, especially up by

48:36

reservoir, we have senior citizens

48:38

literally walking in the road just to

48:39

get to their homes. No sidewalks. I

48:42

could even send you uh pictures if you

48:43

need, but something we could potentially

48:45

look at together. Um, and that's all.

48:47

Thank you.

49:00

Thank

49:01

you. Our last committee business for

49:04

this evening lies with the public works

49:06

committee. I will defer to our public

49:09

works committee chair, Councilman

49:11

Rodriguez, to lead discussion. Thank

49:14

you, Madame President. Um to begin

49:16

public works, we will be discussing

49:18

resolution 24 of 2025. Mr. Trudale, do

49:21

you mind reading resolution

49:23

2425 into the record?

49:25

Resolution 24, 2022, a resolution

49:28

authorizing the city of Harrisburg to

49:30

negotiate and enter into a professional

49:32

services agreement with Urban Engineers

49:34

Incorporated for the purpose of

49:36

providing construction inspection and

49:38

construction management services on an

49:40

asneeded basis. Thank you for that. And

49:42

I do see the city's engineer here as

49:45

well as a representative from urban

49:46

engineers. if you would like to speak

49:48

directly into the mic and state your

49:50

name and your role in the city just for

49:52

the residents at home and then just kind

49:54

of give us an overhaul of resolution

49:55

2425.

49:58

My name is Joel Sers. I'm the city

50:00

engineer. Thank you.

50:04

Hello. My name is Brian Pete. I

50:05

represent urban engineers out of our

50:07

local office here. And thank you both

50:09

for being here. Um Joe, if you'd like to

50:10

give us just an overhaul of what a

50:12

resolution

50:14

2425 encompasses. Sure. So the the city

50:18

of Harrisburg has a lot of upcoming

50:20

construction projects. Uh we have

50:22

Sycamore Street, Berry Hill Street,

50:24

Chestnut Street, and that's just uh this

50:26

year. Uh in the future, we're going to

50:28

have much larger corridors such as

50:31

Division Street, Walnut Street, uh some

50:34

work on on her street. And it's it's

50:37

also my intent um similar to Sycamore

50:39

and Barry Hill Street to continue that

50:41

program throughout the city. Just uh you

50:44

know, like you said, everywhere needs

50:46

work. So, uh I I do not want to slow

50:49

down on any of the construction. And

50:52

then on the I call it smaller side, but

50:55

still significant is we have a lot of um

50:58

utility work being done in the city and

51:01

that requires what we call a street cut

51:03

permit. And last year alone, we had over

51:07

500 of these. And this is where they

51:08

they dig up the road and that we kind of

51:11

inspect it and make sure they put it

51:12

back according to um the city

51:15

specifications. And quite frankly, we're

51:18

we're just underst staffed to do all

51:20

these larger projects, 500 smaller

51:23

projects, which is why I went forward

51:25

with a an RFP for construction

51:28

inspection

51:29

services to to help the city on an as

51:32

needed basis. So it's not a constant

51:36

constant work, but It's as needed as as

51:38

we start to get overwhelmed. I can call

51:41

on the selector firm to to kind of

51:44

assist and

51:46

um Brian and Urban Engineers put it

51:49

together a fantastic proposal and I I

51:51

have no

51:53

recommending them for selection. And

51:56

when you put the RFP out, how many um

51:58

applicants reply to that? So the it was

52:02

put out on to pen bid. I know we had at

52:04

least 40 different firms documents.

52:07

We've only we only received two

52:10

proposals. Um, but the uh the team that

52:14

Urban put together is just fantastic.

52:17

I've worked with some of them in the

52:18

past. I know a lot of them have done

52:19

work in the city in the past. I see no

52:23

issues. And for the selection, was it

52:25

you that made the selection or was that

52:26

done by It was a committee. Okay. based

52:29

on

52:31

um it was me and one other um in the

52:35

public works department. Yep. I actually

52:37

spoke with director West and Mr. Jackson

52:39

today. Um just to get a little bit of

52:41

background of it so I'm a bit familiar.

52:43

Um if our rep from urban engineers would

52:45

like to say a few words to council. Yes.

52:47

I just like to thank you for this

52:48

opportunity. Um you might you might need

52:50

to bring it a little closer. No, I just

52:52

want to say one thank you for this

52:53

opportunity here. One thing I would like

52:54

to just share is that u we decide to

52:56

assemble a large team of consultants

52:57

here. know it's not only urban

52:59

engineers. We brought five other

53:00

companies onto our firm or on our team

53:02

for this work. Uh that way we can you

53:04

know share the work with our teaming

53:05

partners. We take pride in that you know

53:08

sharing you know opportunities with

53:10

other companies and get other people

53:11

involved with this work. Um you know we

53:14

have done work in the city of Harrisburg

53:15

since 2017. We're very familiar with the

53:17

city uh the processes. We worked on the

53:20

third street multimodal project. Uh so

53:22

if you're familiar with that quarter

53:23

going up through uh the market there and

53:25

also did a lot of work uh doing

53:27

inspection and construction management

53:28

on second street. So like I said we've

53:30

done quite a bit of work in the city um

53:33

you know and hope our service will

53:34

assist. Absolutely. And with the other

53:38

entities that you brought on board do

53:40

you know the participation at all with

53:42

like MBE WBE participation? So we have

53:45

two MBE firms on board three in

53:46

consulting in the Varight and we have a

53:48

WBE firm uh JBC Associates. are located

53:51

here in the city limits. Um, and Joel

53:54

can second this. In our past agreements,

53:55

we really do try to uh increase our MBE

53:58

participation. I know in some agreements

54:00

we've been over 20%. So, that's amazing.

54:02

We take pride in that. That's amazing.

54:04

That's amazing.

54:07

Um, I have no further questions. I think

54:10

like as you said um Joel, we have a lot

54:13

of work to do and you know if we can get

54:14

great people in that know what they're

54:16

doing that can do the work appropriately

54:18

and you know really take care of the

54:19

city I think the more the better. Um is

54:22

is there are there any uh conflicts of

54:24

interest that you think may appear

54:25

between any of the other entities that

54:28

you have with the city? Do you foresee

54:30

any by chance? I'll speak first here. So

54:32

the reason we put together a large team

54:34

should there be a conflict of interest.

54:36

Any firm that might be conflicted in

54:37

that particular work would just not be

54:39

able to be involved with that particular

54:40

project. Perfect. Perfect. Awesome.

54:42

Well, I have no further questions. Thank

54:44

you both for being here. And I'll open

54:46

the floor up to council. Uh starting to

54:48

my immediate left with Councilman Jones.

54:51

Thank you, uh Council Member Rodriguez.

54:53

So yeah, my my question is similar to uh

54:55

Council Member Rodriguez when you're

54:57

looking at these other entities and I

54:59

know you say that they're Harrisburg

55:01

based. um just because they're in the

55:03

city limits. Um you know, again, I'm

55:06

always going to be an advocate to make

55:08

sure some of uh when I say local, I'm

55:11

not talking about Reading York. I'm

55:13

talking about people right here in the

55:15

city of Harrisburg. Um I'm not sure if

55:18

you um do you have a list of any of

55:20

those individuals that could potentially

55:22

um assist you um as you're moving

55:24

forward? Um, are you aware of some of

55:27

the local trade schools that some of our

55:29

young people I'm saying even down to a

55:30

gopher job, man. I'm just saying. So,

55:33

this industry has been a huge struggle

55:35

for the entire industry. We are open to

55:37

anybody that wants to apply for a job

55:39

with us. We have always have an open

55:41

application for construction inspectors

55:43

on site. We've been going to trade

55:44

schools just trying to get interest in

55:46

this industry. So, if there's an

55:48

opportunity, we definitely want to look

55:49

into that. Okay. Pay for all their

55:51

certifications, get them trained. That's

55:54

that's I think that's a great

55:55

opportunity. We have to begin to try to

55:57

make uh pathways for some of the

55:59

individuals here to get into some of

56:01

this because I know a lot of these

56:02

industries are dying. Carpenters,

56:04

electricians, all types of things. So,

56:06

um we do have some things set in place

56:08

here, not just DC Tech, but we have some

56:10

other um organizations that are working

56:12

with people right here as residents in

56:15

um Harrisburg. And I think that this

56:16

again could be another great opportunity

56:19

for us to be able to couple those

56:21

things. So if you need any assistance,

56:23

I'm readily available and try to point

56:25

you in some good directions. I would

56:26

love any information on that. Be very

56:28

helpful. All right. No problem. And for

56:30

me, that's it. Thank you, Councilman.

56:32

Councilwoman Ross. Thank you very much.

56:35

My only question was um I know you said

56:37

as a need on a needs to basis. Do you

56:41

have u maybe a rough estimate on how

56:43

many times you may need to call on urban

56:45

engineering um to help out just we like

56:48

costwise because I know it's by hourly.

56:50

I did see that in the resolution. So

56:52

just a rough estimate how much we might

56:54

be spending with the percentage.

56:56

The the contract would be on an as

56:59

needed basis and it would be dictated by

57:02

my consulting line item. So I I couldn't

57:04

exceed that budget, but I I foresee no

57:06

more than 100,000 per year for the three

57:08

years. Okay. For a total of 300,000.

57:12

Okay. Thank you for that um information.

57:15

And it's kind of like like you said

57:17

almost um I don't want to say checks and

57:19

balance but a little bit because you say

57:21

we don't have the manpower at the

57:23

moment. Actually checks and balances

57:25

would be a great uh great u description

57:28

because we have to hold the contractors

57:31

to the city standards. Correct. And

57:33

that's where urban engineerings would

57:35

come in. Okay. I think that's great.

57:37

Thank you. Um that's it for me. Awesome.

57:40

Thank you councilwoman. Madam President,

57:43

I don't think I have any questions. It's

57:45

a three-year It would be a three-year

57:48

agreement. Um, you mentioned some of the

57:51

projects. Okay, maybe one question

57:53

related to the uh projects for this

57:56

year, I guess, as soon as this is

57:59

enacted. Do you envision their

58:01

assistance um through the end of the

58:03

year at all? Yes, as soon as uh as soon

58:06

as we have their assistance, I'm going

58:08

to use them wherever we can. Okay. Thank

58:10

you. I don't have any other questions.

58:12

Thank you, Madam President. Madame Vice

58:14

President, uh, thank you for being here

58:16

tonight. I don't have any questions. Uh,

58:18

thank you for the presentation, a very

58:19

detailed proposal, and thank you for the

58:21

detailed fee schedule. So, that's it.

58:23

Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Thank

58:26

you, Councilman

58:28

Rodriguez. Good evening, gentlemen. You

58:31

mentioned Okay. You've been working with

58:33

the city for many years. Have you ever

58:37

offered u any jobs through um MBE or

58:43

utilize any of the businesses in the

58:46

city and if so who are they?

58:50

We haven't used any uh of those entities

58:53

in the city that I'm aware of. Um you

58:55

we're kind of locked to who we bring

58:57

onto our agreement at the beginning of

58:59

the the the agreement essentially. But

59:02

there are qualified firms and there's

59:04

opportunity to bring them on our team.

59:05

We would certainly be open to that.

59:09

Thank you.

59:11

Thank you, Councilwoman. Uh,

59:13

Councilwoman Daniels.

59:18

Awesome. Um, is there anything you

59:20

gentlemen would like to add before I

59:22

make a motion?

59:26

Yep. Councilwoman, yep. I just wanted to

59:28

say really quick, Mr. Siders, just thank

59:30

you for what you had said earlier about

59:31

not wanting to stop. you were saying

59:33

that um there's lots of roads in our

59:36

city that you know need to be upgraded,

59:38

fixed, sidewalks, but just thank you for

59:40

just saying that you were determined to

59:42

get that done. I think that's great.

59:44

You're welcome. There's always work to

59:46

do. Yes, there is in Harrisburg, but

59:48

we'll keep you busy, but I just

59:50

appreciate you seeing our city.

59:53

All right. And um uh before I make a

59:56

motion to add to our next legislative

59:58

session, I'd like to see if council has

1:00:00

any other questions, concerns, comments.

1:00:03

All right. Hearing none, I'd like to

1:00:04

make a motion to add this to our next

1:00:06

legislative session, which I believe

1:00:08

April 22nd, Madam President. Um and that

1:00:11

concludes the business of the public

1:00:12

works committee. Thank you. Thank you.

1:00:16

We will move forward with our meeting

1:00:18

agenda. Next, we have public comment.

1:00:21

Just a few housekeeping notes before we

1:00:23

begin. Please state your name and your

1:00:25

address for the meeting record. If you

1:00:27

don't feel comfortable sharing your

1:00:28

address, please share the vicinity in

1:00:30

which you live within the city. You will

1:00:33

have four minutes to share your

1:00:34

comments. We have a new uh timer that I

1:00:39

hope everyone um is able to see. It is

1:00:43

green and to assist

1:00:48

with being mindful of time. We're not

1:00:50

sure when time is up what it will sound

1:00:53

like, but we're going to test it out

1:00:55

this evening.

1:00:59

Okay, Mr. Truzale will operate our new

1:01:03

timer. I will begin to my right. Is

1:01:05

there anyone that would like to offer

1:01:07

public comment?

1:01:21

Hello.

1:01:23

Hey, I'm Mark Santanis. Run the

1:01:26

clock. It's my goal to not be the one to

1:01:29

uh have the dinger go off here. So, um

1:01:32

I'm Mark Santana. I live at two at 200

1:01:35

block of Liberty Street in downtown

1:01:37

Harrisburg. Um I've lived here for 25

1:01:40

years. I come here as a city resident as

1:01:43

well as the president of capital area

1:01:45

neighbors with our jurisdiction goes

1:01:48

from Fort Street to Walnut Street, Front

1:01:50

Street to uh Third Street. So basically

1:01:54

the first area map is our jurisdiction,

1:01:58

but I'm also here as a resident

1:02:00

supporting the extension into Midtown

1:02:02

because as although this is in the

1:02:04

public safety committee, I believe this

1:02:07

to be also an economic development uh

1:02:10

component. Uh I lived here in 2000 when

1:02:13

they first started the restaurant row. I

1:02:15

think the first liquor control board

1:02:18

exempted area started in 1999. Is that

1:02:21

correct, Neil?

1:02:23

that old. Okay. But anyway, when I moved

1:02:26

into town, Arugas was a boarded up

1:02:28

building. Like, it was dead downtown.

1:02:30

There was nothing going on. And when uh

1:02:33

Mayor Reed had started the liquor

1:02:34

control board exempted area, it opened

1:02:37

it up and allows us to police ourselves

1:02:39

instead of the liquor control board

1:02:41

commenting on policing. So, I think the

1:02:43

key component here is to say Harrisburg

1:02:46

can take care of our own. We can police

1:02:48

ourselves. As explained, there's many uh

1:02:51

citizens still can call 911. They can go

1:02:54

to the LCE. They have many angles to if

1:02:58

someone wants to act out. We don't need

1:03:00

the LCB in Harrisburg policing us. We

1:03:03

can police ourselves. Um so I would like

1:03:05

to support resolution 20 and the

1:03:08

amendment to add Midtown because I

1:03:12

believe Harrisburg is in crisis.

1:03:14

Downtown is in crisis. Anyone that opens

1:03:17

a bar or a restaurant or still is

1:03:19

hanging on with the bar or restaurant

1:03:20

should be commended and has a lot of

1:03:22

courage. We should be trying to help

1:03:24

them as much as we possibly can. Thank

1:03:27

you. Thank you. Is there anyone else to

1:03:30

my right?

1:03:36

Hello. I'm uh at Jurro 1521 North Second

1:03:39

Street, apartment 1. Is my timer

1:03:41

started? Okay. If you go over, there's a

1:03:44

trap door.

1:03:45

go down. Um, anyway, I'm I'm here also

1:03:48

for resolution 2020 2022 to uh approve

1:03:51

the map including Councilman Jones uh

1:03:53

amendment to extend up into Midtown. I

1:03:56

think my tone is basically I want to be

1:03:58

supportive of the businesses, the

1:04:00

entrepreneurs, make Harrisburg a good

1:04:02

place to invest and uh and I think also

1:04:05

the other comment you know in the

1:04:07

unlikely idea if there is a complaint I

1:04:10

do agree the concept of local control,

1:04:12

right? people can come here and you know

1:04:14

if they've got a problem we don't need

1:04:16

five layers of management at the state

1:04:18

and meetings that take whatever all

1:04:20

kinds of time. So for those reasons I

1:04:22

hope you approve it tonight and uh

1:04:24

appreciate your time. Thank you.

1:04:26

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

1:04:29

right that would like to offer public

1:04:30

comment?

1:04:37

Ryan Weatherford 1100 North Third

1:04:39

Street. Um, shalom to my Jewish

1:04:41

brothers. Saw what happened to Josh

1:04:43

Shapiro on the news. We condemn any

1:04:45

anti-semitism. I'm not too sure what

1:04:47

happened with that one. But, uh, I think

1:04:49

violence reduction, gang reduction. All

1:04:52

my brothers over there to the right

1:04:53

about the liquor control board. I think

1:04:55

we can police ourselves. It's a lot of

1:04:57

homelessness out there. You know, I walk

1:04:58

everywhere. My girlfriend has a car cuz

1:05:00

she pregnant. She got a Chevy white

1:05:01

Malibu. Um, so, um, I say all that to

1:05:05

say when you walk around Harrisburg,

1:05:06

like I got like a 100,000 steps this

1:05:08

week. I work at credential as a

1:05:10

financial advisor. It's a lot of

1:05:12

shenanigans going on out there. So, I

1:05:15

would just ask that you know control

1:05:18

with all that stuff. You know, we just

1:05:19

got to keep Harrisburg sovereign. That's

1:05:21

all I would say. Your honor, that's all.

1:05:23

But again, Josh, what up, baby? That's

1:05:25

all I got to say.

1:05:28

Thank

1:05:29

you. Okay. Is there anyone else to my

1:05:32

right? I don't want to miss anyone.

1:05:34

Okay. Seeing and hearing. No one. Anyone

1:05:37

in the middle section?

1:05:42

Good evening, council. My name is John

1:05:44

Trainer. I'm here representing the

1:05:45

Harrisburg Midtown Arts Center project

1:05:47

on Third Street. And it's in resolution

1:05:50

20 is actually critical for the survival

1:05:54

of music venues in the city um both in

1:05:57

Midtown and downtown. Without it, they

1:06:00

wouldn't be able to function. And I

1:06:02

would also draw your attention to the

1:06:03

fact that the 2017 map was actually

1:06:08

continuing resolution from

1:06:10

2014. So in 2014, Midtown was was

1:06:15

included in the noise exemption and then

1:06:18

again and in those days you had

1:06:21

a three-year extension for the LCB and

1:06:25

then the LCB did another extension in 17

1:06:29

to

1:06:30

2019. How the map changed in

1:06:34

2019, we have no idea, right? Because as

1:06:38

somebody that would have been affected

1:06:39

by it. We were giving no notice of it

1:06:41

and we believed as did other businesses

1:06:44

in Midtown that we were part of that

1:06:46

noise exemption. So I think it might

1:06:47

have been an oversight when they put

1:06:50

that map together in 2019. They went

1:06:53

back to prior to

1:06:56

2014 because the it was a continuing

1:06:59

resolution from from 200 well 1999 to

1:07:04

2002 and then 2017 there was an

1:07:07

amendment to that continuing resolution

1:07:10

and then 19 we we have no idea what

1:07:14

happened there. Um so I just wanted to

1:07:16

bring that to your attention. It's not

1:07:18

just the 17 map. actually was affected

1:07:22

in

1:07:24

2014. And thank you for your time.

1:07:27

Thank you.

1:07:29

Is there anyone to my left that would

1:07:31

like to offer public comment?

1:07:49

Good evening, council president and

1:07:51

members of city council and members of

1:07:53

the public. My name is Robert Williams

1:07:56

and I reside in the Capitol Heights

1:07:57

section of Harrisburg. I appear before

1:07:59

you today formally to propose a new

1:08:02

ordinance titled police transparency and

1:08:05

accountability reporting ordinance. I

1:08:08

have brought physical copies of the

1:08:09

proposed ordinance this evening for the

1:08:11

chief of for the chair of public safety,

1:08:14

the president of city council, and the

1:08:16

city solicitor. I respectfully request

1:08:18

your review and consideration of this

1:08:20

adoption. This ordinance is designed to

1:08:22

establish a responsible recurrent

1:08:24

reporting framework of bureau for the

1:08:26

bureau of police regarding the use of

1:08:28

body warn cameras. While many residents,

1:08:30

including myself, recognize the value of

1:08:32

body warn cameras and enhancing public

1:08:34

trust and accountability, the value

1:08:36

depends on more than just having the

1:08:38

equipment. It depends on what we do with

1:08:40

the data. That's why this ordinance

1:08:43

calls for quarterly reports to be

1:08:44

submitted to the mayor, city council,

1:08:46

and cleat. These reports will provide

1:08:48

foundational information such as the

1:08:50

number of officers equipped with body

1:08:52

warn cameras, any technical issue with

1:08:54

the system, and once permitted through

1:08:56

bargaining, additional data that can

1:08:58

help identify trends and improve

1:09:00

department policies. Importantly, this

1:09:03

ordinance does not overstep legal or

1:09:05

contractual boundaries. It was drafted

1:09:07

to be fully compliant with act 22 of

1:09:11

2017, the right to know laws, the

1:09:14

criminal history record information act,

1:09:17

the juvenile act, and act 111 governing

1:09:20

collective bargaining with police

1:09:22

unions. The ordinance acknowledges that

1:09:25

some of the the ordinance acknowledges

1:09:27

that some of the most meaningful data

1:09:28

such as body warrant activation

1:09:30

compliance, non-activation reasons and

1:09:33

footage use and internal investigations

1:09:36

relates directly to officers working

1:09:39

conditions. As such, it does not attempt

1:09:42

to bypass the collective bargaining

1:09:44

process. This is legally cautious and

1:09:47

forwardlooking. It enables the city to

1:09:49

begin building a foundation of

1:09:51

transparency now while respon excuse me

1:09:55

while responsibly planning for deeper

1:09:57

data reporting once labor negotiations

1:09:59

will allow. It helps Harrisburg avoid

1:10:02

litigation or labor disputes by

1:10:04

proactively respecting our legal

1:10:06

obligations. In short, this ordinance

1:10:09

strikes the right balance. It advances

1:10:11

transparency for the community. that

1:10:13

respects the rights and contracts of our

1:10:15

officers and its long-term

1:10:17

accountability policym based on data and

1:10:20

not assumptions. I urge the council to

1:10:23

consider this proposal seriously and to

1:10:25

refer it to the appropriate committee

1:10:27

for further review and possible

1:10:29

introduction. I am happy to provide

1:10:31

digital copies, answers to any questions

1:10:33

and work with any member of this body,

1:10:36

the city solicitor, and to refine any

1:10:38

part of this ordinance. Thank you for

1:10:40

your time and commitment to the people

1:10:41

of Harrisburg. Thank you.

1:10:45

Thank you.

1:10:48

You have time.

1:10:50

Can I pass this off to Mr. Trudale and

1:10:53

he give it to you? Yes, please. Thank

1:10:55

you.

1:10:56

Oh,

1:11:08

I like to know.

1:11:20

Okay.

1:11:41

It looks kind of short. Okay. Is there

1:11:44

anyone else to my left or anyone else

1:11:47

present that would like to offer public

1:11:49

comment? I don't want to miss

1:11:51

anyone. Okay. Okay, seeing and hearing

1:11:54

no one, the time is 6:40 p.m. I will

1:11:57

entertain a motion to adjurnn. So move.

1:12:00

Is there a second? Second. Thank you. We

1:12:03

stand a journ.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free