Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Meeting - 06/16/2025

1:31:49EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
3:48

601. Um

3:51

and um just going to give a couple

3:53

ground rules um this evening. Uh the we

3:57

have uh four scheduled hearings. One of

4:00

them is going to be continued. Um so we

4:04

have a stenographer. Um and when the

4:07

stenographer is here to take a record of

4:10

the proceedings this evening. So it's

4:13

important that um when um somebody is

4:17

speaking somebody doesn't speak over

4:18

them. We want to make sure that we have

4:20

a complete record in case there's an

4:22

appeal. Um the first case we're going to

4:26

call we're going to uh call one case out

4:30

of order. Uh case number 2603.

4:34

It's relative to the property located at

4:36

1951 Hurst Street.

4:39

Um

4:41

we'll open this uh hearing. um and just

4:44

put in the record that um that we

4:47

received uh what I'm going to mark as

4:50

exhibit B1, which is an email from the

4:52

representative of the applicant uh

4:56

requesting a continuence uh to the July

5:01

21st uh 2025 zoning hearing board

5:05

meeting. Um, so we just wanted to, uh,

5:08

announce that on the record so we don't

5:10

have to readvertise again, uh, for next

5:13

month. Um so um with that we could um

5:18

we'll close that hearing

5:22

and uh we'll move on to

5:25

uh the item that was number one on the

5:28

agenda uh item number 2602 which is the

5:32

variance application for 213

5:36

Market Street Harrisburg Pennsylvania.

5:40

We're going to identify and swear in

5:41

some witnesses and then I'm going to

5:43

mark some board exhibits. Um so um Mr.

5:48

Knight U who is the uh codes

5:52

administrator zoning officer, could you

5:54

please identify yourself for the record?

5:57

Uh Jeffrey Knight, planning director for

5:58

the city of Harrisburg. Okay. And do you

6:01

swear or affirm that the testimony

6:03

you're about to give to this board is

6:04

the truth and nothing but the truth? I

6:06

do. Okay.

6:08

And um

6:10

um Steve um do you want to um introduce

6:15

yourself and uh who you're going to have

6:19

as uh witnesses to testify this evening?

6:22

Absolutely. I'm Steve Albert from Mcnes

6:24

Wallace and Nurk. Uh we represent the

6:26

downtown improvement district for the

6:28

city of Harrisburg. Um, with me tonight

6:30

is Kevin Coots from Strickler Signs, uh,

6:33

who will be able to explain a little bit

6:34

more about the project itself, and then

6:36

Todd Vanderweed, who is, um, with the

6:38

Downtown Improvement District as well,

6:40

going to be my witnesses.

6:43

Um, Mr. uh, Kun, could you, um, spell

6:47

your last name for the record? C O T.

6:53

And Mr. Vanderweed. Yeah, it's Vander

6:56

Woody. It's T. last name is two words v

7:07

Mr. Vander Woody and um Mr. Kun, could

7:10

you please uh raise your right hand? Do

7:13

you swear or affirm that the testimony

7:15

you're about to give before this board

7:16

is truth and nothing but the truth? I

7:19

do. Okay. So, I'm going to mark uh a few

7:22

exhibits that we've uh received uh from

7:31

I'm going to mark these as board

7:33

exhibits. Uh uh exhibit B1, board

7:35

exhibit number one is proof of

7:37

publication. The time and place and

7:40

particular nature of this matter was

7:42

advertised in the Patriot News, which is

7:44

a newspaper of general circulation for

7:47

the city of Harrisburg.

7:49

uh and that appeared uh on June 1st and

7:52

June 8th, 2025.

7:55

Exhibit B2 is a letter dated June 12th,

7:58

2025 from the planning director, Jeffrey

8:01

Knight, to the applicant uh notifying

8:03

the applicant of the time and place of

8:06

the uh hearing. Uh board exhibit number

8:09

three is the hearing not notice which

8:11

was posted upon the property in question

8:14

that occurred on March 26, 2025.

8:18

Board exhibit number four is the

8:20

application's not applicants

8:22

notification letters and to the required

8:24

neighbors. Exhibit B5 is the application

8:28

packet including the narrative,

8:31

photographs and plans for the proposal.

8:35

Board exhibit number six is the deed to

8:38

the property to establish uh standing uh

8:42

as well as B7 which is an agreement

8:44

establishing applicant standing to

8:46

pursue zoning relief. Uh board exhibit

8:49

number eight is the bureau case report

8:53

and board exhibit number nine is the

8:55

city of Harrisburg planning commission

8:58

resolution. And I also want to add that

9:00

from the city solicitor's office, we

9:03

have this evening Jonathan Luff.

9:07

And with that being the case, uh Mr.

9:09

Knight, did did you want to give an

9:11

overview of this matter? And then we'll

9:13

have the applicant present their case.

9:15

Uh sure. Uh so the um application for

9:18

2602 uh for case number 2602 uh involves

9:22

the replacement of an existing uh

9:24

internally illuminated LED sign uh on

9:27

the western uh facade of the uh property

9:30

at 213 uh Market Street with a sign

9:34

that's uh larger than permitted by right

9:37

uh per the zoning code. Um the allowance

9:39

in the zoning code uh for the downtown

9:41

center district in which the property is

9:43

located is 75 square feet. Uh and the

9:46

applicant is proposing uh a sign of 175

9:49

square feet. Uh because there's already

9:52

electronically changing messaging um in

9:54

the existing sign, uh that

9:56

non-conforming aspect of the uh property

9:59

and of the proposed sign uh can be

10:01

continued uh moving forward. Um, in this

10:04

case, the um conditions that establish

10:08

uh the hardship uh that would grant the

10:10

variance uh involve uh the building's

10:12

location at a fairly highly trafficked

10:16

um intersection where uh e quick and

10:19

easy um uh observing and uh reading of

10:23

signage is critical for uh the safety of

10:26

all users, pedestrians, bicyclists,

10:28

transit uh and drivers. Um,

10:32

additionally, the um specific location

10:35

around the sign, especially if you're

10:36

coming uh eastbound on Market Street, uh

10:38

is pretty visually congested area. You

10:41

have uh both the traffic signals um and

10:45

uh other light poles and um street

10:47

furniture uh around the intersection.

10:49

And then there's also a large clock

10:51

tower that's kind of right in front of

10:52

where the sign is as you're looking uh

10:55

directly at it. Um and so uh you know

10:58

all of these conditions obviously impact

11:01

the uh legibility and visibility of the

11:03

proposed sign. Um and so uh the

11:06

applicants are requesting a sign about

11:08

twice as large uh as the current one uh

11:10

that is there on site. um in order to um

11:14

mitigate these conditions around the

11:16

property. Uh the applicants have also

11:18

noted that uh for the most part uh the

11:20

messaging is going to be limited to um

11:25

that for public announcements and public

11:26

events as well as for the nonprofits. Um

11:29

there will be um uh advertising of the

11:32

uh bank uh building on which uh the uh

11:36

signage sits, but otherwise that's the

11:38

only um advertising for uh uh the

11:41

private sector uh that would occur um

11:43

via the signage messaging. Uh so uh for

11:47

all of those reasons, the planning

11:49

commission has recommended that the

11:51

zoning hearing board approved the

11:52

request for the following with the

11:54

following condition. Uh because the

11:56

applicant is predicating their request

11:57

on driver legibility and safety, the

11:59

planning bureau recommends the signage

12:01

limit message transitions to limit

12:04

message transitions to six transitions

12:06

per minute for pend guidance for

12:08

billboards and previous approvals for

12:09

similar proposals granted by the zoning

12:11

hearing board. Uh and um just to

12:13

clarify, those are largely for uh

12:15

billboards. Uh but of course um you know

12:18

we would imagine that the uh conditions

12:21

would be you know largely similar uh

12:23

more visibility on a highway but uh also

12:25

faster moving traffic. So kind of the

12:27

slower moving traffic but the more

12:29

visual obstructions kind of offset each

12:30

other there in that case. Uh the

12:33

planning commission is recommending uh

12:34

the zoning hearing board approve the

12:36

request for the following reasons.

12:37

proposed signage will better promote

12:39

publicly accessible activities and

12:40

events held by government agencies and

12:42

local nonprofits and will not be used to

12:44

advertise private businesses other than

12:46

that of the property owner and thus

12:47

there's a significant public benefit

12:49

component to the proposal. Uh given the

12:51

context of the signage location on a

12:53

large building facade at a major

12:54

intersection in a visually congested

12:56

area, the current sign is somewhat

12:58

unnoticeable or illeible and thus there

13:00

is justification for allowing larger

13:01

signage more conspicuous to drivers and

13:03

pedestrians.

13:06

Okay, thank you. Does uh anybody from

13:09

the board have any questions of Mr.

13:10

Knight at this point?

13:15

Okay. Um

13:20

Mr. Albrand, um we just heard the um Mr.

13:25

tonight um indicate that the planning

13:28

commission uh recommended uh a condition

13:32

of um

13:34

to limit the message transitions to six

13:37

transitions per minute. Is that

13:39

something that your client is agreeable

13:41

to? Yeah, correct. As it stands now, I

13:44

mean, it's every 20 to 30 seconds at

13:46

this point, so that won't be a problem.

13:47

Okay. We don't plan on changing it

13:49

anyway. Okay. Go ahead. You could

13:51

proceed with your case then. Thank you.

13:53

Well, Jeff did a great job of giving

13:54

some background. Uh, I kind of stole my

13:56

thunder with all all the facts he gave

13:58

and how thorough he is, so I appreciate

14:00

that. Um, but, um, a couple things. Um,

14:04

basically just reiterating what he said.

14:05

The downtown improvement district is a

14:07

place, um, where, you know, the

14:08

community thrives. People can get

14:10

involved. We want to encourage

14:11

participation. We want to encourage

14:12

people getting out and getting involved

14:13

in the community. Um, and we also want

14:15

them to be able to do that safely. Uh, I

14:17

don't know if you guys noticed the sign

14:18

when you drove in today to this meeting.

14:20

Um, but it I didn't notice it because,

14:23

you know, it's not that visible. It's

14:25

very hard to see. There's a lot of

14:26

obstructions. Um, it's very outdated.

14:28

And we're just looking to change that

14:29

and bring it up to speed with the with

14:31

the community and the everchanging urban

14:32

landscape. So, electronic electronically

14:35

changing wall signs are permitted by

14:37

Wright in the um in the DC district uh

14:40

pursuant to section 7325.11

14:43

um which regulate the illumination of

14:45

signs within the city. The proposed sign

14:48

um was designed to comply with section 7

14:50

325.11 of the zoning ordinance and will

14:52

be more aesthetically pleasing and safer

14:54

for passing vehicles kind of as Jeff

14:56

said um to read as they pass through the

14:58

second and market streets downtown. Um I

15:00

know when I'm sitting at that stoplight

15:02

it's hard to see that sign. And

15:04

basically what we're doing is we're

15:05

taking um the existing condition and

15:07

we're just bringing it up from window to

15:08

window. If you ever look at that

15:10

building there's windows on top, there's

15:11

a bit of a a gap in the middle and then

15:13

there's windows on the bottom. And we're

15:15

just trying to fill that gap to give as

15:16

much area as we can so people can

15:18

clearly see the sign and clearly see

15:20

what's advertised without having to, you

15:21

know, worry about bicyclists or people

15:24

walking in front of them while they're

15:25

trying to read the sign. It's very

15:26

apparent. It's very clear. Um the

15:28

proposed sign is approximately 175

15:30

square feet. The sign as it exists today

15:32

is 88 square feet, which is also

15:35

non-conforming pursuant to the ordinance

15:37

which has a limit of 75 square feet. Um

15:40

section 7325 attachment one uh

15:43

subsection 3 of the zoning ordinance

15:45

limits the sign area of a wall sign to

15:47

only only 75 ft. Uh the existing sign

15:49

has exceeded that square footage

15:51

requirement since at least about 2008.

15:53

That's where we have, you know, our last

15:54

record of of them ever changing that

15:57

sign. Um the downtown improvement

15:59

district is seeking a dimensional

16:00

variance um from section 3 3- or 7-325

16:03

of the zoning ordinance to permit its

16:05

approximately 175 square foot

16:07

electronically changing message wall

16:09

sign. Accordingly, we're here tonight to

16:11

request the zoning hearing board

16:12

consider the recommended approval from

16:13

the planning commission uh and grant the

16:15

approval of the downtown improvement

16:17

district's variance to um allow a 175

16:20

foot uh square foot electronically

16:22

changing message wall sign in the DC

16:24

district. Um, at this time I will have

16:26

Kevin CS from Strickler Science come up

16:28

and provide some comments on the sign,

16:30

its design and aesthetics, um, vehicle

16:32

and pedestrian safety, and the sign's

16:33

technical specifications and compliance

16:35

with the building.

16:38

All right. So, Kevin, um, who do you

16:40

work for? Strickler. And what is your

16:43

role with Strickler Signs?

16:48

How long have you been in that role?

16:50

2015 took ownership for seven

16:54

Have you done work with the downtown

16:56

improvement district before?

17:02

And in your opinion, how important is

17:04

sign visibility at this particular

17:05

location where the sign's located?

17:16

Uh, thank you. I forgot to mention I did

17:18

bring some easier to read exhibits. Do

17:20

you guys want those? Sure. just because

17:21

I'm going to reference them with Kevin

17:23

here. They're in the uh application

17:26

packet, but they're towards the back and

17:27

kind of

17:51

We get one more of those. Yeah.

17:55

Thank you. All right.

18:00

I have one. Yeah.

18:05

Oh, sorry about that. Sure. All right.

18:07

So, before you is exhibit A. What is it?

18:15

And can you please orient the the board

18:17

uh to the property as it's situated in

18:18

this picture? It's on the

18:22

west facade.

18:28

And is this property in a busy stretch

18:30

of the DC district?

18:33

Do a lot of vehicles and pedestrians see

18:34

the existing sign from its current

18:36

location? And now before you is exhibit

18:38

B. So you guys want to flip to the next

18:40

couple pages here?

18:45

What is this?

18:53

Dimensions of the currency

18:55

and please use it to describe the

18:56

existing sign. Well, existing sign is

18:59

4T4 by 204.

19:18

All right. And if you would turn to

19:19

exhibit C, which is the next page, um,

19:22

can you explain what this is?

19:25

That is an image of

19:28

the upper right corner.

19:33

It is 7 foot, which is 7 foot.

19:40

10 million.

19:43

Most of the dots already.

19:46

All right.

19:48

And uh will the proposed sign comply

19:50

with all of the requirements of section

19:52

7-325.11

19:54

regarding the illumination of signs

19:56

within the city? Yes. And why is it

19:58

important for that sign particularly to

20:00

be 175 square feet?

20:03

Um the current signage it serve purpose

20:07

certainly needs greater clarity.

20:12

And is the proposed sign safer for

20:14

motorists to read? Why is that? Um, you

20:18

can have uh gater images

20:28

and is the proposed sign safer for

20:29

pedestrians in the city? Okay. Is the

20:32

proposed sign designed to provide

20:34

adequate time and travel distance for

20:36

motorists to safely detect, read, and

20:38

understand the proposed sign and its

20:39

contents?

20:41

And will the proposed sign uh alter the

20:43

essential character of the neighborhood

20:45

or the DC district?

20:47

Can you explain why? It's it's the same

20:50

technology.

20:53

And does the proposed sign alter the

20:55

development of any adjacent property?

20:58

Is it detrimental to the public welfare?

21:00

And in your opinion, is the minimum

21:02

variance necessary to afford relief to

21:04

the applicant? Yes. All right, that's

21:07

all my questions I have for Kevin. Do

21:09

you guys have any questions for

21:13

anybody? I ask one question

21:17

in

21:20

cont.

21:25

That's going to be a question for Todd.

21:28

Is that okay? You want to ask it now?

21:31

Yeah. The the downtown improvement

21:33

district is responsible for putting the

21:35

messages up on the board up on the sign

21:38

board.

21:44

And

21:46

who maintain? I'm just looking at some

21:49

of the specs

21:52

of what you can replace, what's there,

21:55

what's being replaced. Who's going to

21:56

handle the maintenance of it? month

21:59

maintenance, annual maintenance,

22:00

snowstorm kicks in, causes some

22:02

problems. Who handles that? That'll be

22:05

with Strickler. Um, as as before, and

22:08

I'll get a little bit into the history

22:10

of the existing sign if you'd like. Um,

22:13

so the the existing sign was put up in

22:16

2008.

22:18

Um, had had a 10y year or so life. And

22:22

as we were talking, you know, as Kevin

22:24

mentioned, it it ran its course. So, it

22:26

worked for 17 years, so it no longer

22:29

works anymore. So, when we did have a

22:31

panel go out or something go wrong with

22:34

it, so to speak, um, we just called

22:37

Strickler and they came and and within

22:40

very reasonable amount of time to fix

22:42

that sign. So, we'll have that same type

22:44

of agreement again as we move forward

22:46

with the new board.

22:49

And since this is on the MT building,

22:52

you've got necessary

22:57

to post this building. Correct. Yeah,

23:00

they already have two stationary wall

23:02

signs near the top if you ever seen

23:03

those coming across the bridge. Um, but

23:06

this will also advertise their bank as

23:08

well for the ground level people on on a

23:10

rotating basis. So, that would be

23:11

intermixed with all the other

23:12

announcements.

23:21

Actually, good evening. Um, I do have

23:23

one question tonight. Uh so I know we've

23:25

had a number of other applications um

23:28

related to sign variances. Um I think

23:31

some from the school district and there

23:33

was I think one or two other ones that I

23:34

can remember. But um in terms of this

23:36

application, do you see any factors that

23:39

are you know vastly different from those

23:41

applications? Um, I would say the ex the

23:45

surrounding urban environment is um more

23:48

chaotic uh and active than in a lot of

23:51

the uh other schools uh signage

23:53

locations. Um and some of the other ones

23:56

I think have been like churches and

23:57

stuff. Those tend to be in uh more

23:59

residential areas um and uh thus have

24:04

like less street furniture around,

24:05

signage, light poles, stuff like that.

24:07

Um, so I would say that's the main

24:10

difference between those types of

24:11

environments.

24:13

Thank you.

24:17

Um, Mr. Loft, do you have any questions

24:18

of, uh, Mr. Kudz?

24:22

Okay.

24:24

Then I'll proceed with Todd. So, um,

24:26

Todd, I'm going to ask you a series of

24:27

questions. So, who do you work for? I am

24:29

the executive director for the

24:30

Harrisburg Downtown Improvement

24:32

District. And how long have you been in

24:33

that role? Uh, I started in that role in

24:36

2008, so 17 plus years. And you've kind

24:39

of already alluded to this, but I'll say

24:41

it anyway. Uh, can you please tell the

24:42

board a little bit about the existing

24:44

sign and why the downtown improvement

24:45

district is replacing it at this time?

24:47

Yes. Um, unfortunately, the the sign

24:50

broke down. It was no longer fixable.

24:52

Uh, the parts uh just couldn't work

24:54

anymore. Strickler put a ton of

24:55

band-aids on there for us, and I

24:57

appreciate that. Um, but it it ran its

25:00

life, so we we need to replace that

25:02

board. Um, So, the downtown improvement

25:05

district, we're the clean, safe, and

25:06

beautiful for downtown. That's our

25:08

mission. Uh we also want to attract and

25:11

inform people of events that go on

25:14

downtown. And that's really what and the

25:16

surrounding area. That's really what we

25:18

use this board for is to really attract

25:22

and inform people of events, city

25:24

events, county events. Um you know,

25:26

Artsfest, which was a couple weeks ago,

25:29

uh we would have put up there July 4th

25:31

food trucks. uh the parades that we do,

25:35

um Capona's coming up, all that kind of

25:38

stuff. We we feature those on there. Uh

25:41

we also look at the nonprofits, you

25:43

know, the art association, um Open

25:46

Stage, uh the events at the forum and

25:49

that kind of stuff. So, that's that's

25:51

really what we try to do is really

25:53

attract and inform people of what's

25:55

going on in the Harrisburg area. All

25:58

right. So, you just said, you know, what

25:59

happens with the with the existing sign?

26:01

Are you guys going to on using the new

26:04

sign in the same manner as the existing

26:05

sign? Yes. Yes. And will the proposed

26:08

sign be used to advertise, identify, or

26:10

direct to the public um any businesses

26:13

other than Mnt Bank in exchange for

26:14

compensation? No, we we're not going to

26:17

sell any advertising on that board. Yep.

26:19

Okay. So, how will this sign improve the

26:21

DC district and the downtown area? Well,

26:24

I I think it it what it will do is it

26:26

will give us a a nice vehicle um to

26:30

really

26:31

do what I already mentioned. Now, we we

26:33

have social media and we have a

26:35

newsletter. We have that kind of stuff

26:36

to inform people of what what's

26:38

happening. But I think something this

26:40

visible uh in a visible part of the

26:43

city, Market Square, uh right there in

26:45

that building really does help uh with

26:48

with us and and really the city's

26:50

programs here. So, in your opinion, the

26:52

sign will provide a community benefit.

26:54

Yes. And did you review the application

26:57

that was submitted in support of this

26:58

variance request? Yes, I did. And to the

27:01

extent applicable, do you adopt the

27:02

comments made therein as um part of the

27:04

downtown improvement district zone? Yes.

27:07

All right. That is all I have for Todd.

27:08

If you guys have any questions

27:11

purpose. Okay. Does the board have any

27:13

questions of uh Mr. Vander? No. Um

27:19

Mr. Loft, do you have any questions of

27:22

Okay. Um, is there anybody uh any

27:25

citizen here that uh wants to make a

27:28

comment with regards to this application

27:33

hearing? None. Um,

27:37

you're completed with your Yeah, I just

27:39

would say for all the reasons that we

27:40

articulated this evening as well as

27:42

what's contained in the zoning hearing

27:43

board application, uh, we would request

27:45

that the zoning hearing board approve

27:46

this variance request to permit this

27:48

proposed sign as designed in the DC

27:50

district.

27:57

I'll make a motion to accept the approve

28:02

to approve the recommendation

28:05

for the

28:09

signific

28:16

indicated by the

28:19

planning director

28:21

and the planning hearing board.

28:25

Okay. So that that would be uh your

28:28

motion is to approve the variance uh

28:31

request conditioned upon um the uh

28:35

conditions set forth by the planning

28:38

commission. Um that let me get it here

28:43

that the applicant will limit uh message

28:45

transition to six transitions per minute

28:48

per pendot guidance for billboards and

28:52

previous approvals for similar proposals

28:54

granted by the zoning hearing board.

28:58

Second.

28:59

Moved and seconded. Any discussion?

29:02

All those in favor signify by saying I.

29:05

I. Okay. You'll receive a written

29:08

decision within 45 days of today's

29:11

hearing. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank

29:13

you very much. Appreciate it.

29:20

No thanks.

29:39

Okay. Next on the agenda is um item

29:44

number 2604.

29:47

Uh this is a um

29:53

this is a special exception request

29:56

uh by Bella's Events.

29:59

Uh and uh it's with regards to the

30:02

property located at 1025 Market Street,

30:06

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, which is

30:08

located in the downtown town center uh

30:12

district. Um Mr. Knight, you were uh

30:16

previously sworn in at the last hearing.

30:19

Do you agree that you uh you are still

30:21

sworn in and we'll tell the truth to the

30:23

board? I do. Okay. Um the applicant, do

30:26

you want to introduce yourselves, spell

30:28

your last names for the record, please?

30:31

Yeah. My name is Dale Hair H I R with

30:35

Katie Free Design Studio and I assisted

30:38

the owner and the petrol tenant.

30:44

Okay.

30:56

Okay. Um Mr. Mr. Harum, Miss Salace, uh,

31:00

could you please raise your right hand?

31:02

Do you swear or affirm that the

31:03

testimony you're about to give before

31:05

this board is the truth and nothing but

31:06

the truth? I do. Okay. And we'll know

31:10

for the record uh from the solicitor's

31:12

office, we have Jonathan Luff here

31:13

present.

31:15

Um, I'm going to mark uh some uh

31:19

exhibits that uh we've uh received, the

31:22

zoning hearing board has uh received

31:26

and has in their file.

31:28

Um, I'm going to mark as board exhibit

31:30

number one, proof of publication. Uh,

31:33

the time and place and particular nature

31:35

of this matter was advertised in the

31:37

Patriot News. Uh, the ad uh the ad

31:40

appeared on the June in a June 1st and

31:43

June 8th uh, publication of the Patriot

31:46

News. Board exhibit number two is a

31:48

letter dated June 12th, 2025

31:52

uh from the planning director, Jeffrey

31:55

Knight, to the applicant notifying the

31:57

applicant of the time and place of this

31:59

hearing. Board exhibit number three is

32:01

the hearing notice uh posting on the

32:04

property in question which occurred on

32:05

May 30th, 2025.

32:08

Board exhibit number four is the

32:09

applicant's notification letters to the

32:12

required neighbors. Board exhibit number

32:14

five is the application packet including

32:17

the narrative,

32:18

photos of existing conditions

32:21

and business plan uh as a part of uh

32:25

this proposal. Board exhibit number six

32:28

is the deed to the property. Board

32:30

exhibit number seven is a commercial

32:32

lease agreement establishing the

32:34

applicant standing to pursue zoning

32:36

relief in this matter. Board exhibit

32:39

number eight is the planning bureau's

32:40

case report and board exhibit number

32:42

nine is the city of Harrisburg planning

32:45

commission resolution. So we have board

32:49

exhibits 1 through nine and then with

32:51

that uh Mr. Knight could you uh please

32:54

give us a summary if you would. Sure. Uh

32:58

so uh case number 2604 uh involves uh

33:02

the uh establishment of an event space

33:05

use uh on the subject property at 1025

33:08

uh Market Street. Um and as the board um

33:12

uh recalls uh in the past when they've

33:15

reviewed these, these have been um filed

33:17

under a use not specifically prohibited

33:19

in the zoning code uh per section

33:21

7-303.11

33:23

uh B of the uh zoning code. Um and uh

33:27

for the most part, you know, these are

33:30

similar type uses to maybe a bar or um

33:33

even like a nightclub or dance hall, but

33:35

they uh definitely have kind of

33:37

different intensity uh of operations,

33:40

different activities on site. Um and um

33:45

when uh fielding inquiries about these

33:47

uh types of uh uses, uh we often refer

33:52

back to um a uh a an application that

33:58

was reviewed several years ago by the

33:59

zoning hearing board uh at 2307 Berry

34:02

Hill Street. Um and in that case uh the

34:05

applicant um agreed to both uh

34:07

prohibition on alcohol uh on site um and

34:11

um capping their hours at uh 108 10 p.m.

34:15

in that case. Uh and the reason these

34:18

types of uh conditions are necessary is

34:20

because uh in the plane beer's

34:22

experience uh many times uh applicants

34:25

may try and establish an event space

34:27

which ends up being a de facto Bob club

34:30

or again a nightclub or dance hall. Um

34:33

and when these um kind of fall uh when

34:36

these kind of try and use loopholes in

34:38

the zoning code um to establish

34:41

something like that uh we often end up

34:43

having um adverse impacts down the road.

34:46

Um and so for you know about the last 5

34:50

years or so the um event space use as

34:53

it's become more popular in the city has

34:55

been filed um and submitted to the

34:57

zoning hearing board for their review

34:58

under the use not specifically

34:59

prohibited. In this case, uh we note

35:02

that the uh property is um in a fairly

35:05

congested area. It's um while it's in

35:07

the downtown center, it's right on the

35:09

eastern edge of that zoning designation

35:11

um along a at a fairly highly trafficked

35:14

intersection of Cameron Street and

35:16

Market Street. Um the building itself uh

35:20

has a commercial or industrial history.

35:22

I think the most recent um the most

35:25

recent informal use was a a motorcycle

35:28

membership club, I believe. Um and uh

35:31

prior to that, the last recognized use

35:33

was, I believe, a furniture store. Um

35:35

and uh there aren't really any um

35:38

housing units within probably, you know,

35:41

even a quarter mile of of this property

35:44

uh or several at least 1,000 ft. Um and

35:47

so any impacts uh to the surrounding

35:50

community would be limited, especially

35:52

in comparison to some of the other uses

35:54

in the neighborhood. Um like a

35:56

restaurant that's in the adjacent

35:58

property. There's a gas station um caddy

36:00

corner on the property, auto repair and

36:03

auto sales uses uh down the down the

36:05

street along Cameron Street. Um and so

36:08

again, we anticipated there will be very

36:09

minimal impacts. Uh the one thing that

36:12

we did want to make sure of um was that

36:15

parking uh would be accounted for um in

36:18

this use the properties in the downtown

36:20

center, which does not require parking.

36:22

Um but obviously if you're going to be

36:24

having events, especially with upwards

36:26

of 90 people, which is the limit that

36:28

the applicants have um indicated in

36:30

their business plan and in their

36:31

testimony at the planning commission

36:33

meeting, um you know, there's going to

36:35

be some people driving. While there is

36:37

parking um along Market Street, uh

36:40

although there is none on Cameron

36:42

Street, uh there are fairly few spaces

36:45

there, maybe four or five. Um and it's

36:47

anticipated that you know you'd have

36:49

more vehicles than that for you know

36:51

most of your events. Uh so uh we did

36:54

encourage the applicant to um secure

36:57

off- streetet parking um whether at one

37:00

of the nearby surface parking lots or or

37:03

a parking lot that accompanies another

37:05

use like across the street at 1028 uh uh

37:08

Market Street. Uh that property has a

37:11

accessory surface parking lot at the

37:12

rear of it. Um, it should be noted and

37:16

again this parking is not required and

37:18

it should be noted that there is on

37:19

street parking on North and South 10th

37:21

Street which is just a block away uh

37:23

where you can do on street parking um

37:25

along the curb there. Uh but we did want

37:27

to make sure that that uh consideration

37:30

was taken into account um in the

37:31

applicant's operation of their business

37:33

um just to ensure again that uh you know

37:37

there's safe accommodations for all

37:39

people who will be attending. Uh, with

37:42

that being said, the planning commission

37:45

recommended that the zoning hearing

37:47

board approved the request for the

37:48

following conditions. Given the location

37:50

within the AE uh flood plane and the

37:53

floodway, the applicant and property

37:55

owner must ensure that any investments

37:57

in the property are submitted to the

37:58

planning bureau for consideration and

38:00

review against the flood plane

38:01

regulations and best practices before

38:03

work can commence. and further testimony

38:06

at the planning commission meeting. Uh

38:08

the applicants indicated that there will

38:09

be only uh minimal or cosmetic

38:12

investments being made, paint, things of

38:13

that nature. Um the planning bureau

38:15

recommends the applicant consider

38:17

coordination with the owners of nearby

38:18

surface parking lots such as 1001 or

38:21

1028 Market Street to secure leases for

38:23

all street parking spaces so that

38:25

patrons do not end up parking on the

38:26

sidewalks near the property. Um, and

38:29

again, you know, that's some not

38:31

something that's required, but something

38:32

that would be recommended for the safety

38:34

of all attendees. And with respect to

38:36

the sidewalk parking, um, that's

38:38

something that the planning bureau staff

38:39

has noticed just informally while

38:41

driving by the property and not

38:43

attributable to this business, which has

38:45

not been set up yet, but other

38:46

businesses kind of on that block at that

38:48

intersection, people just feel more

38:50

comfortable driving up onto the sidewalk

38:52

so that their cars aren't going to get

38:53

like sideswiped or anything. So that's

38:55

why we recommended, you know, finding

38:57

surface parking or finding parking in a

38:59

surface lot. Uh and finally, the

39:01

applicant must ensure they conform to

39:02

the operations as outlined in the

39:04

submitted business plan, including a

39:05

prohibition on alcohol consumption and

39:07

having operations end no later than

39:09

midnight. And that is something that the

39:12

um uh Miss Salis has uh agreed to in

39:15

their testimony at the planning

39:17

commission meeting. Uh the planning

39:18

commission recommends the zoning hearing

39:20

board approve the request for the

39:21

following reasons. property is located

39:23

in a mixeduse corridor with nearby

39:24

commercial, industrial, and

39:26

institutional uses, but no nearby

39:27

residential units, and thus, the

39:29

proposed use should not have an adverse

39:30

impact on the neighborhood. The

39:32

applicant has provided a detailed

39:33

business plan confirming that no alcohol

39:35

will be consumed on site and that events

39:37

will not run past midnight. As such, the

39:39

proposal is similar to a previously

39:41

approved event space use at 2307 Berry

39:43

Hill Street, located in a residential

39:45

neighborhood which has not had adverse

39:46

impact on the community. And finally,

39:49

the proposed development will activate

39:50

an existing vacant building with a use

39:52

that will accommodate the special

39:53

occasion needs of local residents,

39:55

hoping to activate the area on nights

39:57

and weekends.

40:00

Thank you, Mr. Knight. U Miss uh Salace,

40:03

um you heard the three conditions that

40:06

uh Mr. Knight um just indicated that

40:09

were conditions from the planning

40:11

commission. Are you agreeable to those

40:12

three conditions?

40:15

Okay. Um,

40:19

Mr. Hair or Mr. or Miss Salace, if you'd

40:22

like to present your case. I mean, the

40:25

only thing is on on the parking, the

40:27

owner of the property has been in

40:29

contact with the adjacent people there.

40:31

He doesn't have any written agreement

40:32

with them. Now, he has some verbal

40:35

agreement that they are and they're

40:36

still working on that. It is tough to

40:39

get some of the other ones because the

40:41

other properties are for sale there. And

40:43

like the one parking lot behind there is

40:45

29th they want $750,000

40:50

question but they are working on on the

40:52

parking again parking she's looking at

40:55

Friday and Saturday nights I think is

40:58

the main times which is not going to be

41:00

as much parking so there should be

41:02

adequate parking you know long street

41:07

you want to maybe describe your business

41:09

a little bit better

41:11

um I've had this I've had this event

41:14

this um for about 10 years now. Um and

41:18

I've worked on it. It's one of my

41:21

passions and um I have been looking into

41:25

a more secure parking because like you

41:27

said there is street parking but a lot

41:30

of the people that would want to rent um

41:33

our my place would want secure parking.

41:36

They wouldn't want to pay for parking.

41:37

So I'm actively working um I've looked

41:41

into to actually getting in touch with

41:44

the owners for that parking right on the

41:46

back. Um, it's been pretty difficult

41:49

because they're only interested in

41:50

talking to you if you want to buy the

41:53

per property. But I'm still working it

41:56

um to secure, you know, um, and parking

41:59

would really be on Friday nights um,

42:03

depending on when

42:05

um, the event the events would happen.

42:09

Friday nights or Saturday afternoons

42:12

nights.

42:15

And could you tell the board a little

42:17

bit about the type of events that you're

42:19

envisioning to that you're going to have

42:21

at this facility? So, what I want to

42:24

provide is a space for people to hold um

42:28

special events like birthday parties,

42:32

um if a business wants to have um a

42:34

conference or any anything like that. I

42:38

I am I'm an event planner. So I want to

42:41

provide packages. People can come and

42:44

have an event place where they can find

42:47

decorations. I can help them organize

42:50

everything that they need and have them

42:54

basically

42:57

for birthday parties, weddings,

43:00

wedding receptions.

43:04

What other things?

43:08

Correct.

43:10

Oh, the the uh the

43:14

so the sweet 16 in our in my community

43:17

Hispanic which is a vast large of my

43:20

clients we celebrate the 15 year of age

43:24

and a lot of people um at that same

43:28

street market street at that church St.

43:31

Francis of Aisi they hold every Saturday

43:34

there's a King era there. So I'm a part

43:37

of St. Francis. We've been part of that

43:40

church for um many years since I've been

43:42

here. So they're always looking for a

43:45

safe place close to the church to have

43:48

their receptions and celebrate

43:50

those.

43:53

Okay.

43:55

Um, and I think you you originally

43:58

testified that uh this is something that

44:00

you've been working on for a number of

44:02

years. Do you I've been working as an

44:05

event planner decorator for 10 years.

44:08

Um, my event had used to have another

44:10

name after I had my daughter. Her name

44:12

is Vala. So, I just after her, I'm a

44:16

single mom that's just wanting to um you

44:19

know, have her and have this business

44:23

for me and my daughter. Okay.

44:27

Does the board have any questions of

44:29

either of the two witnesses?

44:33

Good evening. Um so, in terms of I guess

44:36

the the occupancy of the building, what

44:39

would you expect in terms of the maximum

44:41

number of you know, attendees at one of

44:44

the set events that you have. As I

44:47

planning

44:49

90 people,

44:53

part of that is also building

44:58

that.

45:03

Okay. Thank you.

45:10

A couple questions.

45:12

I look at your hours of operations. Is

45:14

this uh only weekends?

45:18

Um as of now, most of the events would

45:21

happen Friday. People would normally

45:23

don't do events like this. Obviously, I

45:26

am open into businesses wanting to small

45:31

conferences or things like that which

45:33

I've helped with at you know I have a 9

45:37

to5. So those girls can also

45:41

but I'm obviously open to think outside

45:44

the box for the weekdays but mainly the

45:48

main would be over the weekend rarely.

45:51

Some do, don't get me wrong, some do do

45:54

events on Mondays or Tuesdays, but it's

45:57

most

46:01

days a week

46:04

to 10 to midnight.

46:09

Second question,

46:18

this is inside the the

46:21

CRW foot plane. Okay.

46:25

Do you have any talks with CRW to make

46:28

sure that you know you put a business

46:30

there and pray? We have a humongous

46:34

storm

46:36

that could basically affect your

46:38

business insurance.

46:41

We have flood insurance.

46:58

No alcohol.

47:08

I'm just going to go around. Mr. L, do

47:10

you have any questions of the

47:11

applicants?

47:13

Okay. Yeah, Mr. Hops. Yes. I just have

47:17

an additional question. Um, I do see the

47:20

hours right are 2 p.m. to 12 a.m. Um,

47:22

have you do you have any consideration

47:24

for anything like u security or any

47:27

service like that uh for any events that

47:29

you um I have because the the front door

47:34

right

47:37

area I have thought about putting not

47:41

security but putting somebody in charge

47:44

of the doors

47:47

to and parent is not because a lot of

47:51

parents

47:52

sometimes are not you know the kid can

47:55

choose to open the door and just go out

47:57

and park

47:59

I I've thought about having a person

48:02

responsible of the door to make sure

48:04

that no kids um go out outside without

48:09

an adult just to be safe just to be on

48:13

the safe side. Gotcha. But no specific

48:16

requirements for like anyone that is

48:18

renting I mean that is using I would

48:21

provide that service when renting the

48:23

person. So I would that would be um when

48:26

I charge for said event the hours I

48:29

would include that um for the safety of

48:34

Okay. Thank you.

48:38

Any other questions?

48:43

you're not

48:45

sure

48:49

when you have events that people reach

48:53

out to police department

48:57

make sure that everything is safe even

49:00

though it's on street that's pretty

49:02

that's probably one of the easiest

49:08

I Would

49:10

you not have these events

49:16

here

49:19

and

49:23

let them know that it's going to be

49:25

something if it would be a

49:35

Okay. Um, I think I know the answer to

49:38

this, but is there anybody here uh from

49:41

the community that has any uh comments?

49:46

Just let the record show that there are

49:48

not. Um, is there anything else you have

49:51

to present or is that everything? Okay.

49:54

Does the board wish to uh do you have

49:57

any other questions or like to make a

49:59

motion?

50:03

Yeah.

50:07

will return.

50:56

Okay.

55:51

So

55:53

back into order.

55:56

All right. I am going to make a motion

56:00

to approve uh the application 26 or 2604

56:05

at 1025 Market Street. Um keeping in

56:08

mind the conditions set forth by the

56:10

planning commission.

56:13

I'll second.

56:16

Moved and seconded. All those in favor

56:18

signify by saying I. I. Okay. Motion

56:22

passes. Uh you'll receive a written

56:24

decision within 45 days of today's

56:27

hearing.

56:29

Okay. Thank you.

56:56

Okay. So, is the applicant here for the

57:00

uh 1415 Sycamore Street? You could come

57:02

up to the applicant's desk there.

57:11

Okay, we'll call the next matter which

57:14

is uh number 2605.

57:17

This is a variance and special exception

57:19

application for the property located at

57:23

1415

57:25

Sycamore Street in the city of

57:27

Harrisburg.

57:29

Um

57:32

Jeffrey Knight uh is the U

57:35

codes and zoning officer. Um you were

57:38

sworn in in previous uh hearings this

57:41

evening. Uh do you agree that you're

57:44

you'll continue be sworn in and testify

57:47

truthfully before this board? I do.

57:50

Okay. And then um the applicants, could

57:53

you please identify yourselves and spell

57:56

your last names for the record so the

57:58

court reporter

58:00

has them accurately? My name is Ali.

58:03

It's S A.

58:08

Okay. My name is Hassam Ali.

58:17

Okay. Will you both uh raise your right

58:20

hands? Uh do you swear or affirm that

58:22

the testimony you're about to give

58:24

before this board is the truth and

58:26

nothing but the truth?

58:28

Okay.

58:29

Um

58:32

and also for the record, I just want to

58:34

indicate that uh attorney Jonathan Luff

58:37

here is uh present for the solicitor's

58:40

office. Um with that, Mr. Knight, uh

58:44

would you be able to give us a summary

58:46

of this matter? Uh sure. So um the uh

58:51

application for case number 2605

58:54

uh involves the um establishment of con

58:57

of a convenience store on site uh at

58:59

1415 Sycamore Street uh which requires a

59:03

variance for the proposed use. Uh the

59:05

applicants also require a special

59:07

exception for relief from the off-

59:08

streetet parking requirements for such a

59:10

use uh because the um building occupies

59:14

the entirety of the site and therefore

59:16

no uh parking can be provided uh on

59:19

site. Um in this case we're you know as

59:23

a general rule the uh um planning bureau

59:27

and really the zoning code would kind of

59:29

discourage the establishment of a use

59:31

like a convenience store in the RM

59:32

zoning district. Um, however, uh, in

59:36

looking at the, uh, history of this, uh,

59:39

property, um, you can see that it's kind

59:43

of designed for at least commercial use.

59:45

Uh, although the property itself has

59:47

been, uh, vacant for probably 20 years

59:50

or so now. Uh, it's a little a little

59:52

tough to tell exactly how far back, but,

59:54

you know, looking at Google Streets

59:56

View, uh, there really hasn't been any

59:57

activity on site since about since at

59:59

least 2011. Um, however, when you uh

1:00:02

look back in the county's tax parcel

1:00:05

records, uh the photo that they have for

1:00:08

this property shows a sign uh over the

1:00:12

main entrance uh that appears to say uh

1:00:15

that appears to indicate that there was

1:00:16

a um store there. I think it's like

1:00:18

Manor Grocery and Deli um or grill um on

1:00:23

site. So, it does appear that there was

1:00:24

a similar use several decades ago

1:00:27

operating on site. Um, and the long-term

1:00:31

vacancy of the property also uh hints

1:00:36

and the um deteriorating condition that

1:00:38

has resulted from that vacancy also

1:00:41

hints at the difficulty um in

1:00:43

establishing a byite use for the

1:00:45

property and frankly not just under the

1:00:47

current zoning code but under the pri

1:00:48

prior zoning code as well. Um so uh that

1:00:52

long-term vacancy and the condition of

1:00:54

the property uh the planning bureau does

1:00:56

feel creates the conditions that

1:00:58

establish a hardship uh which do justify

1:01:01

uh the variance for the proposed use. In

1:01:04

addition uh to the variance there is a

1:01:07

special exception for relief from the

1:01:08

off street parking requirements. I

1:01:10

believe that based on the uh square

1:01:11

footage of the uh property the use would

1:01:15

require nine off- street parking spaces.

1:01:18

Um again as previously noted there are

1:01:21

no uh there is no space on the property

1:01:24

uh for um to provide off- streetet

1:01:26

parking. Uh the building occupies the

1:01:29

entirety of the site. Um

1:01:32

so uh the question becomes whether the

1:01:36

uh property can meet the criteria uh for

1:01:39

relief from off streetet parking. Um it

1:01:42

should be noted that uh there is a

1:01:46

significant amount of curb uh frontage

1:01:48

along um this block of Sycamore Street

1:01:51

and the blocks to the east and the west.

1:01:54

uh the blocks directly to the west um

1:01:57

has a uh elementary school uh the Fouse

1:02:00

elementary school um and uh during you

1:02:03

know informal visits to the and by the

1:02:05

and through the property um it's

1:02:08

generally observed that there is

1:02:10

sufficient parking uh on the site uh

1:02:12

along the curb um to accommodate any

1:02:15

demand uh from the proposed use. Uh when

1:02:19

I went and posted the uh property and

1:02:21

took pictures uh even though the school

1:02:23

was letting out uh which is right around

1:02:25

3:00 3:30, I was able to find a spot um

1:02:29

on the right in front of the property

1:02:31

just directly to the east. Uh and during

1:02:34

that time it's the most if anybody's

1:02:36

been there, it's the most uh you know

1:02:38

busiest time there along that corridor

1:02:40

as schools letting out and uh parents

1:02:42

are there to pick up children. Uh but

1:02:44

for pretty much any other time there's

1:02:46

um a significant availability of uh

1:02:48

parking along the street there. Uh

1:02:50

additionally um for uh uses of this type

1:02:54

uh most of the customer base and the

1:02:56

clientele come from the surrounding

1:02:58

neighborhoods and are likely to walk

1:03:00

here. Uh it's not the type of use that

1:03:02

would necessarily uh generate long

1:03:04

distance trips or have a customer base

1:03:07

from a large catchment area. Um and

1:03:10

between this availability of on street

1:03:11

parking and the expectation that the

1:03:14

customer base will largely uh walk or

1:03:16

maybe bike uh to the property, uh the

1:03:19

planning bureau feels that the property

1:03:21

does meet um the uh conditions that

1:03:25

justify uh both the variance and special

1:03:27

exception.

1:03:29

The planning commission uh is has

1:03:32

recommended that the zoning hearing

1:03:33

board approved the request with the

1:03:34

following conditions. Uh the applicant

1:03:36

must ensure the business conforms to all

1:03:38

specific criteria outlined in section

1:03:40

7-309.2Q

1:03:42

of the zoning code uh which largely

1:03:44

relates to um the storage of materials

1:03:47

outside uh having uh security uh both

1:03:50

inside and outside the building and then

1:03:51

having trash receptacles outside of the

1:03:53

building uh and the signage regulations

1:03:55

outlined in chapter 7-325 of the zoning

1:03:58

code. Uh the applicant may not keep

1:04:00

products, displays, freestanding signage

1:04:02

or any other materials in the uh yard

1:04:04

sidewalk in front of the building. And

1:04:06

finally, uh the applicant must allow the

1:04:08

codes bureau to perform a comprehensive

1:04:10

inspection of the entire property and

1:04:11

building to ensure aspects such as

1:04:13

utilities and access points are up to

1:04:15

modern codes and to ensure the

1:04:16

structural stability of the building.

1:04:18

And again, this goes back to the long uh

1:04:20

vacancy um of the uh property. it's

1:04:23

likely, you know, maybe uh stuff has

1:04:26

been taken from the building in terms of

1:04:28

like wiring. Um, and we want to make

1:04:30

sure that uh if uh the uh space is if

1:04:34

the use is approved that the space is

1:04:36

going to be safe for uh not only the

1:04:38

employees but also the general public.

1:04:40

Uh the planning commission uh is

1:04:42

recommending uh that the zoning hearing

1:04:44

board approve the request for the

1:04:45

following reasons. Proposed project will

1:04:47

address a long-standing vacant property

1:04:49

that has created a blighting influence

1:04:50

on the neighborhood. Uh the proposal

1:04:52

will reestablish a convenience store use

1:04:54

on site that appears to have existed

1:04:56

several decades ago and reactivate a

1:04:58

vacant storefront. And there appears to

1:05:00

be sufficient justification for the

1:05:02

proposed variance of special exception

1:05:03

requests including the availability of

1:05:04

on street parking along the 1300 and

1:05:07

1400 blocks of Sycamore Street.

1:05:11

Okay. Thank you.

1:05:13

Um before the applicant uh testifies,

1:05:16

I'm just going to read into the uh

1:05:18

record exhibits

1:05:20

uh that the zoning hearing board has uh

1:05:22

has received. Um I've marked as exhibit

1:05:26

B1, the proof of publication, the time

1:05:28

and place and particular nature of this

1:05:30

matter was advertised in the Patriot

1:05:33

News. It appeared in June in the June

1:05:36

1st and June 8th um uh Patriot News. Uh

1:05:40

B2 is the letter dated June 12th, 2025

1:05:44

uh from the planning director, Jeffrey

1:05:46

Knight, to the applicant notifying the

1:05:48

applicant of the time and place of the

1:05:50

hearing. Board exhibit number three is a

1:05:53

hearing notice which is posted upon the

1:05:55

property in question that occurred on

1:05:57

May 30th, 2025.

1:06:00

Board exhibit number four is the

1:06:02

applicant's notification letters to

1:06:04

required neighbors. Board exhibit number

1:06:06

five is the application packet including

1:06:08

photographs of existing conditions,

1:06:11

floor plans, and a business plan. Uh

1:06:15

board exhibit number six is the deed to

1:06:18

the property. Board exhibit number seven

1:06:21

is the planning bureau case report.

1:06:24

Board exhibit number eight is the city

1:06:26

Harrisburg planning commission

1:06:28

resolution.

1:06:30

Um and then just very quickly um to the

1:06:34

applicant, Mr. Ali and Mr. Ali, um you

1:06:37

heard of the uh Mr. Knight go over the

1:06:40

three uh conditions that are recommended

1:06:43

by the planning commission. Um are you

1:06:46

agreeable to those three conditions?

1:06:49

Okay. All right. Well, then if you want

1:06:51

to tell us about, you know, move forward

1:06:54

with your case and tell us about your uh

1:06:56

proposed store. Um Well, Mr. Knight

1:07:00

covered everything, but

1:07:03

like like you said, it was pretty much

1:07:05

designed to

1:07:34

Okay.

1:07:40

Do either of the board members have any

1:07:41

questions?

1:07:49

A couple of questions

1:07:55

issues

1:07:59

and if my memory serves me well that

1:08:02

that area can be

1:08:05

exciting.

1:08:07

Okay.

1:08:09

So how are you going to go about

1:08:11

addressing that? So we have security

1:08:14

here.

1:08:20

onsite security they worked out

1:08:23

agreements with HBD

1:08:27

well there's always like

1:08:30

I think like a year

1:08:33

couple years back it was exciting as you

1:08:35

said but I think it's gotten a lot

1:08:38

better

1:08:45

security cameras

1:08:48

information.

1:08:51

So they're 24 hours, but now

1:09:08

I see your application.

1:09:13

It wasn't specific enough for me. What's

1:09:16

your hours?

1:09:18

The last meeting we said

1:09:26

it just depends on the

1:09:29

winter times maybe

1:09:40

Have you made any neighbors to basically

1:09:47

also talked to a lot of people were just

1:09:49

sweeping outside.

1:09:56

So from the neighbors we've got pretty

1:09:59

positive feedback

1:10:14

in that area.

1:10:20

They're

1:10:28

there on the other side.

1:10:44

Brother

1:10:56

looked at that. Yeah, we did. But we

1:10:59

serve as

1:11:01

trying to bring in like products.

1:11:20

I also seen your revenue strategy

1:11:23

accepting cards, credit cards, something

1:11:27

with the

1:11:29

compic

1:11:37

we're just going to have

1:11:46

That's all I have. Thank you.

1:11:49

Mr. Hops, you have any questions? Um, I

1:11:52

had some of the same ones that Mr. Fips

1:11:54

have, but I just just one additional

1:11:56

question. So in terms of you being a

1:11:59

convenience store, is it just directly

1:12:02

just for the sale of food and beverage

1:12:05

and some other items or is it going to

1:12:07

be things like I know you mentioned

1:12:08

Delhi. So is it going to be you know

1:12:10

where you're uh preparing ready to serve

1:12:14

food and different things of that

1:12:15

nature?

1:12:18

Okay.

1:12:20

All right. Thank you. I have one more

1:12:22

question.

1:12:26

Convenience stores are a generator of

1:12:28

certain amount of refuge on our streets.

1:12:31

How will you handle basically keeping

1:12:34

your place clean and keeping the

1:12:35

surrounding areas clean? Sorry, but

1:12:40

I got a lot of cleanups and I call and I

1:12:43

can tell you go you buy it, walk outside

1:12:46

the store and it gets discarded and that

1:12:48

basically contributes to the

1:12:54

I want to have it occur

1:13:01

because it's a pretty heavy traffic

1:13:02

area.

1:13:10

Yeah. Yeah.

1:13:14

City convenience store

1:13:19

say okay they keep the place clean

1:13:21

because I we see that so you are going

1:13:24

to basically pay close attention to that

1:13:27

because neighborhood doesn't need

1:13:29

anything else negative about it and

1:13:31

trash refuge is something that affects

1:13:34

that neighborhood.

1:13:42

I I just had one question just just for

1:13:45

the full scope. Um other than food

1:13:48

products, are you going to be selling

1:13:49

anything else at your store like tobacco

1:13:52

products or vaping or anything like

1:13:55

that? Maybe some

1:14:00

Okay.

1:14:05

I was just wondering not and then Okay.

1:14:10

And then um I had a quick question for

1:14:12

Mr. Knight. Um you had indicated before

1:14:16

um that you didn't believe that it was

1:14:19

really possible for this site to be

1:14:22

developed uh as a permitted use in this

1:14:26

zone. Um it's been vacant, you said

1:14:30

probably for around 20 years or so.

1:14:33

at at least I mean we have no record

1:14:35

even in our in DSIT which is where we

1:14:37

keep uh our merkantile records and

1:14:40

building permits and stuff. We have no

1:14:41

record of anything there and I think

1:14:43

looking back into Google Streets view as

1:14:45

far back as it goes which is like 2011

1:14:48

it doesn't seem to be any um real formal

1:14:50

activity on site and you don't know like

1:14:54

looking at that structure I mean a lot

1:14:56

of the permitted uses in the RM zone are

1:14:59

dwellings attached to attached,

1:15:02

detached, manufactured homes,

1:15:05

um multi-family homes, um supportive

1:15:11

housing, adult daycare,

1:15:14

um and you don't you don't foresee um

1:15:17

this property being converted into any

1:15:20

of those uses? Uh I don't think so.

1:15:22

Again, the first floor, I mean, the

1:15:24

building does look like it was uh

1:15:27

constructed for commercial use. Um, and

1:15:30

I think with like the layout of the

1:15:32

first floor, um, there's there's not a

1:15:35

whole lot of space there. So, something

1:15:36

like an adult uh, daycare, it tends to

1:15:39

be larger. You have concrete spaces, um,

1:15:42

you know, things like kitchens and

1:15:44

larger stuff like that. Uh, that I don't

1:15:46

think a property like this would

1:15:48

accommodate a use like that. Okay. And

1:15:50

it looks like from the photographs that

1:15:52

it had some um two or three of those

1:15:56

steel rollup doors in the front. Was

1:16:00

that for um deliveries, do you think, in

1:16:03

the past, or was that opened up in the

1:16:05

past for I think those are for security

1:16:08

reasons. Um it'd be something that like

1:16:10

you'd see in a city or something when

1:16:12

they close at night so that somebody

1:16:14

doesn't break in through the window or

1:16:16

something. If you look far enough back

1:16:17

in the county's records, there were like

1:16:20

a it was like a three side by side

1:16:22

windows on the left and I think the side

1:16:24

on the right would have been a door. So

1:16:26

there were like two doors in the front.

1:16:27

Um so I think it was purely a matter of

1:16:30

security there, not like delivery or

1:16:32

something. Okay. And Mr. Ali, either one

1:16:34

of you, if have you raised those doors,

1:16:37

are there windows underneath? Okay. And

1:16:41

that would be the the front of the

1:16:42

building when somebody would come in.

1:16:44

And then you'd be able to secure them

1:16:46

with those steel doors

1:16:49

secur.

1:16:58

Is there a way to lock them? Yeah.

1:17:04

Okay.

1:17:06

Are there any other questions from the

1:17:08

board?

1:17:10

Mr. L, do you have any questions?

1:17:23

We'll go off the record. Take a quick

1:17:25

recess.

1:30:29

Okay. So, just to just to make sure

1:30:31

because there was a special exception.

1:30:33

So you're you're um making a motion to

1:30:37

approve the uh variance and special

1:30:40

exception request

1:30:42

um condition upon the the uh three

1:30:45

recommended conditions of the planning

1:30:47

commission as uh delineated uh by uh in

1:30:53

the planning commission's um resolution

1:30:56

and by um Mr. Knight here this evening.

1:31:01

All right. Second. moved and seconded.

1:31:04

Um, all those in favor signify by saying

1:31:06

I. I. Okay. Um, so congratulations. Uh,

1:31:13

you'll receive an actual written

1:31:15

decision within 45 days of today's uh

1:31:19

hearing. Okay. Thank you.

1:31:32

Second,

1:31:43

you're going to get used to these. I

1:31:46

will

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free