Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Harrisburg City Council Policy Work Session & Special Legislative Session 9/30/2025

4:03:36EnglishTranscribed Jun 15, 2026
1:35

Thank you for your patience. I was

1:37

having some technical difficulties.

1:40

The time is 5:38 p.m. I would like to

1:44

call our policy work session to order.

1:52

Mr. Chale, could you please call the

1:54

role?

1:57

>> Miss Daniels.

1:59

>> Miss Davis,

2:00

>> present.

2:02

>> Miss Green,

2:03

>> present.

2:03

>> Mr. Jones,

2:04

>> here.

2:05

>> Miss Rolls,

2:08

>> present. Can you hear me?

2:09

>> Yep.

2:10

>> Mr.

2:11

>> Okay, good.

2:12

>> Mr. Rodriguez,

2:14

>> present.

2:15

>> Miss Hill,

2:16

>> present. Thank you. Uh good evening

2:19

everyone. The topic for this evening's

2:22

policy work session is around boards and

2:27

commissions and many of you are

2:29

volunteers on boards and commissions

2:32

throughout the city. Um so the purpose

2:35

of this session is simply to establish a

2:37

shared understanding of the purpose

2:40

structure and ongoing work of city

2:42

affiliated boards and commissions while

2:45

also encouraging greater public

2:47

participation in their efforts.

2:50

I would like to note that we did not ask

2:53

all members of all boards and

2:55

commissions to attend. Rather, we we

2:58

requested that one or two designated

3:02

representatives present on behalf of

3:05

their body uh to briefly cover the

3:08

following areas. Their general function,

3:11

what is the role of your board and

3:13

commission and the scope of its work?

3:17

Current membership status. How many

3:19

seats are filled? Which terms are near

3:22

expiration? Are there any vacancies?

3:25

Public engagement. How often do you

3:27

meet? Are meetings open to the public?

3:30

How is input received? Reporting

3:33

structure. Who does your body report to?

3:36

Council, the mayor, a department, or

3:39

another oversight entity? And finally,

3:42

qualifications for appointment. What

3:45

experiences or characteristics are most

3:48

valuable for prospective members?

3:51

So we will um allow each board to share

3:56

a presentation answering those

3:59

questions.

4:02

So we will begin with the audit

4:04

committee. The members of the audit

4:06

committee if you could please join us.

4:21

Hi there.

4:22

>> Hi.

4:23

>> My name is Austin Cheers and I currently

4:25

serve as the chair for the the city

4:28

audit committee. Um, in terms of our

4:30

general function, we we kind of act as

4:32

an intermediary between the city and

4:35

council and the the inter the uh

4:37

independent auditors. We help interpret

4:39

any results that they may give us. Um,

4:42

and we provide independent review and

4:45

oversight of the city's financial

4:47

reporting process,

4:49

um, the internal controls and the

4:51

independent auditors. We help assess the

4:54

city's accounting and auditing practices

4:57

and help ensure that the independent

4:58

auditors have objectively assessed the

5:02

government's financial reporting um,

5:05

practices. Um, in terms of membership,

5:09

we we we hold a board of five currently.

5:12

There's four of us. One of us, one of

5:13

our long-term members just left a little

5:15

bit ago. Um, we have five-year terms,

5:19

and I believe we just were all sworn in

5:22

maybe maybe two years ago. I I don't

5:24

have the exact date, but um and one of

5:26

the members was filling in for a a

5:29

three-year term because he was taking

5:31

over a another member's term. Um anyway,

5:34

but but we meet we meet quarterly or as

5:37

needed,

5:39

especially whenever the the audit is

5:41

starting to wrap up and the folks over

5:43

at Boyer and Ritter want to meet more

5:45

often to to prevent or to uh to present

5:47

their report to everyone. And um when

5:50

when Brian over in the accounting staff

5:52

is is is starting to ramp up his work.

5:55

So towards the end of the audit, we'll

5:57

meet more often, but usually we try to

5:59

stick to once a quarter. Um,

6:03

in terms of

6:07

love everyone on the board to have uh a

6:10

good knowledge of of financial reporting

6:12

and um you know some some experience in

6:15

the private or or or even government

6:18

sector in in being able to interpret

6:20

results and and look at the numbers and

6:23

we require one member to have a CPA have

6:26

their CPA designation and and I hold

6:28

that. So, um, yeah, I hold that role,

6:32

but yeah, we're we're looking for one

6:34

member right now to fill the vacancy,

6:37

and we would love if that person also

6:39

had a CPA. I know there's not a lot of

6:41

CPAs that live in the city, but it is

6:43

also open to, um, individuals that have

6:47

have worked in the city for at least a

6:48

year, too. So, um, if anyone would love

6:51

to step up to that, that would be great.

6:53

So, but right now we have a good crew

6:56

and we just finished um a couple months

6:59

ago reviewing the 2022 audit and I know

7:02

that the staff is working hard to get

7:03

2023 done and we'll likely have a

7:06

meeting here at the end of October to

7:08

assess where where things currently

7:10

stand with that. So, thank you.

7:14

>> Thank you.

7:20

>> Yes.

7:23

I was just going to note uh formal

7:26

reports and advice that are provided by

7:28

the audit committee. An annual report is

7:31

submitted to city council and the mayor

7:34

summarizing the committee's oversight

7:36

activities. Five-year review and

7:39

recommendations are submitted to city

7:41

council advising uh on ordinance changes

7:44

needed due to new laws, regulations, or

7:47

standards.

7:50

Um, I did want to note that five voting

7:53

members are appointed by city council

7:56

for the audit committee. Yep.

7:58

>> So, it's our responsibility to find

8:01

someone to fill this vacancy. Um, I will

8:04

open the floor to my colleagues who may

8:06

have some questions for you. Um, I'll

8:08

begin with Councilman Jones.

8:10

>> Thank you, President Hill, and thank you

8:13

for your service and thank you for

8:14

coming tonight and share.

8:16

>> Thank you. Um I pretty much get what the

8:19

uh audit committee uh does and again um

8:22

I just like to say thank you for your

8:24

work. Um all of these committees and

8:26

everybody is serving on is very

8:27

important to the city

8:29

>> and I feel that this is very necessary

8:31

so our public can kind of get a better

8:33

understanding of how our uh local

8:35

government works. Um, the only thing

8:37

that I would um ask,

8:41

>> yeah,

8:41

>> is um the last uh bullet point, the

8:45

five-year review of recommendations

8:47

submitted to city council advising on

8:48

ordinances and um changes needed due to

8:50

new laws and regulations. Um I haven't

8:53

seen one yet and

8:55

>> certainly not in the two years that I've

8:56

been here. Yeah, I'll have to look to

8:58

see when the last one was submitted. And

8:59

then

9:00

>> and even at the the last one, I would

9:01

like to um look for that one and then

9:04

all also one u moving forward. Um if you

9:07

have one that was last here before you,

9:09

I would like to see that

9:11

>> and then um just let me know when the

9:13

next one comes out uh you know or reach

9:15

out to President Hill or uh Mr. Trudale

9:19

because I think that's important. You

9:20

know, it's very important right now

9:22

because a lot of laws and we know laws

9:25

change just about every day. is right,

9:26

Mr. Love.

9:28

>> They change every day. So, yeah, that's

9:30

all that's all I have, man. So, uh

9:32

again, thank you for your service.

9:34

>> Thank you.

9:34

>> Thank you, President H.

9:36

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

9:38

questions?

9:40

>> Thank you, Madam President. Um, no real

9:42

questions. I just wanted to thank

9:44

everyone in attendance tonight and their

9:46

ability to serve and their willingness

9:47

to serve. And I just like to thank Mr.

9:50

Trudale, Mr. Humphrey, and of course,

9:52

Mr. Mike in the clerk's office. um

9:54

because I've saw uh Mr. Jared had showed

9:57

me how intense it is with all the

9:59

boards, all of the responsibilities. So,

10:02

my hat goes off to anyone willing to

10:04

serve in this capacity. So, thank you

10:06

all.

10:07

>> Thank you.

10:07

>> Thank you,

10:08

>> Councilwoman Ross. Any questions?

10:12

>> Uh good evening everyone. Uh I don't

10:15

really have any questions either. I just

10:17

want to say thank you for everyone who's

10:18

there today. um especially the board

10:21

members to explain in more detail to the

10:24

residents um about the boards. Um I just

10:28

I'm thank you to the clerk's office and

10:31

also you President Hill for putting this

10:32

together. I think it's so important uh

10:35

so we know uh what boards need to be

10:37

filled, how can they be filled, but also

10:39

the job that they have because the

10:41

boards are just as important as city

10:43

council and our administration. So, um I

10:46

look forward to the continued

10:48

conversation and also look forward to um

10:51

the boards that get filled after

10:52

tonight. So, thank you. No questions.

10:55

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

10:57

questions?

10:58

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Um

10:59

it's good to see you again. I don't have

11:01

any questions about the audit committee.

11:03

Uh as the budget and finance chair, I am

11:05

a non- voting member of the committee,

11:07

so I've got to I've been privileged to

11:09

sit in on some of the meetings and hear

11:10

the discussions. Um I definitely thank

11:13

you all for the work you do, for the

11:14

expertise you have. Um, and that's kind

11:16

of it. So, I look forward to continuing

11:18

to work with you.

11:19

>> Thank you.

11:21

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

11:23

questions?

11:24

>> Thank you, Vice uh President Hill. Thank

11:27

you. Good evening, everyone, and thank

11:29

you for being here this evening, Mr.

11:31

Chairs.

11:33

I don't have any questions. I'll just

11:35

look forward to you coming back in with

11:38

the five-year report.

11:39

>> Sure.

11:40

>> Okay. Yep.

11:40

>> Thank you.

11:41

>> Love to get that to you guys.

11:42

>> Thank you so much. Thanks for being

11:44

here. Thank you.

11:45

>> Um and for sharing about the audit

11:47

committee.

11:48

>> Yep. Thank you all.

11:49

>> Thank you.

11:51

Next we have the Citizens Law

11:53

Enforcement Advisory Committee.

12:01

>> Good evening everyone.

12:04

>> Good evening.

12:06

>> How you doing? Well, this is my first

12:08

time um actually seeing or hearing about

12:11

these questions. So, you know, I'm going

12:12

to do my best as I go uh through this

12:15

process.

12:15

>> Okay. A few notes. Um, of course, uh

12:19

hopefully everybody knows what this uh

12:21

this board consists of or and then the

12:23

meaning of the citizen law enforcement

12:25

advisory board. Uh we um are coming

12:28

together as citizens to, you know, um

12:31

deal with different issues we may have

12:33

in our or questions we may have from the

12:36

officers and as well as our uh

12:38

community. So we can be the liaison and

12:40

and get some of these things uh taken

12:42

care of and make sure nothing's being um

12:44

looked uh bypassed and during the

12:47

process of you know due diligence and

12:49

things of that nature. And even on the

12:52

other side um making sure the law

12:53

officers that uh you know of course

12:56

interact with our community are being

12:58

professional and if they have any

12:59

questions and concerns we're able to

13:01

talk to the community and bring them

13:03

together as well. Um so you know I think

13:06

I this is a great honor to be you know

13:08

the um chair of this board. I've been in

13:10

this community my whole life and I'm

13:12

seeing different things happen that you

13:14

know some positive some negative. It's a

13:16

balance of the both. Um we have seen a

13:18

lot of negativity. Um but I think once

13:20

the biggest thing is we don't we don't

13:22

have enough relationships built you know

13:25

for our community to move forward the

13:27

right way. So that's our goal as well.

13:29

We're trying to build relationships, get

13:31

an understanding of some things, come up

13:33

with some new ideas. Um, right now we

13:35

meet uh once a month until we really get

13:38

a understanding of our structure and our

13:40

power and also, you know, what our

13:42

limitations are um during the process

13:45

because we don't want to overstep our

13:46

bounds to the point we think we are or

13:49

we seem as though we are officers of the

13:51

law. you know, this uh is a committee

13:53

that really is trying to help, you know,

13:56

like I said, the process uh you know,

13:58

with that with our community. Um we have

14:01

a total of nine members. Uh seven were

14:06

uh at this point appointed, you know,

14:09

and they went through a process. Uh two

14:11

were also added that we made us a total

14:13

of nine. We have just done that uh a few

14:16

weeks ago. So now we have a total of

14:18

nine once they but two of need to be

14:20

approved by city council still but uh

14:22

hopefully that goes well. So we'll have

14:25

a total of nine members which that's the

14:27

amount members we need to be successful

14:29

for this cle board. I really think it's

14:32

going to be a powerful thing in the

14:33

city. So one thing we are doing we are

14:36

taking our time with this process. We're

14:38

trying to get an understanding of every

14:40

nuance or angle to make sure that we are

14:43

representing ourselves and our community

14:44

in the best way. So, you know, bear with

14:47

us as we go through this process and,

14:49

you know, learn, you know, our positions

14:52

and, you know, um, how we need to serve,

14:55

you know, through with serve our

14:57

community and our officers. So, that's

15:00

pretty much it. If y'all have any

15:01

questions, I'll be glad to answer any.

15:03

>> Thank you so much. Um, as I did with the

15:06

audit committee, I would like to review

15:09

the formal reports and advice that, uh,

15:12

CLEAC provides. An annual report will be

15:15

submitted to the mayor and city council

15:18

summarizing KEak's activities, findings,

15:21

and recommendations.

15:23

Policy and practice recommendations

15:25

issued to the Harrisburg Bureau of

15:27

Police, the mayor, and city council on

15:30

policing practices, community concerns,

15:33

and legislative or administrative

15:35

reforms. Investigating findings. Cleak

15:39

may issue reports on law enforcement

15:41

practices supported by its ability to

15:44

request records and in some cases issue

15:47

administrative subpoenas during

15:49

misconduct investigations. Finally,

15:52

community engagement reports provides

15:55

updates to the public on crime

15:57

prevention activities, neighborhood

15:59

participation, and police community

16:01

partnership initiatives.

16:04

Again, I'll open the floor to my

16:07

colleagues who may have some questions.

16:08

I'll begin with our public safety chair,

16:11

Councilman Jones.

16:12

>> I got the lucky number today.

16:15

Um, how you doing, Mr. Walker? Thank you

16:17

again uh for your willingness to serve

16:19

as well. Um, this was a very much needed

16:23

um committee to actually come together

16:26

and I know that we are still trying to

16:28

make sure that this um goes as smoothly

16:31

as possible. My only question for you uh

16:34

would be um you know we see a lot of

16:39

contentious

16:41

things in our community between our

16:43

community and the police and I've heard

16:46

some of the overview on um with this

16:49

board how it functions and how it should

16:51

be functioning but um just on a personal

16:53

note you know for the community as well

16:56

with you being the chair um how do you

16:59

see uh bridging that gap between uh the

17:02

police and the community in a

17:05

constructive manner. Well, something in

17:08

that in that sense uh one of the main

17:11

things are coming up with uh creative

17:13

ideas where uh officers in the community

17:16

are interacting in positive environments

17:19

and situations because a lot of their

17:21

interactions are in negative you know

17:23

times or you know it's a lot of friction

17:26

or misunderstanding but I think once the

17:28

relationships are built in the sense of

17:30

now officers are showing up at youth

17:32

sports events things like that they're

17:35

really connecting with the community um

17:37

outside of a a policing or you know

17:40

they're just protecting and serving and

17:42

sometime at that point they're just

17:44

being one of the guys. So you want to

17:46

bring uh be able for the community

17:48

embrace the officers as they they live

17:51

in this community they're part of this

17:52

community which they are because they

17:54

spend at least eight hours a day or more

17:56

you know in our community so they become

17:58

a part of it. So one of the biggest

17:59

things for me myself um even before

18:03

being selected as the chair is you know

18:05

one of my biggest uh attributes is

18:07

building relationships. So you know just

18:09

finding those creative ways and

18:11

hopefully we can get the understanding

18:13

of both sides to work together and you

18:15

know create as much safety and peace

18:18

within our community as possible.

18:21

Yeah, I want to thank you and um that's

18:23

pretty much all for me and and again

18:25

I'll just thank uh you for having the um

18:29

levelheadedness to come into this space.

18:31

Uh again, not to be um someone that's

18:33

going to argue with the police, but

18:35

someone willing to be that conduit and

18:38

bring the community and the police

18:39

together. So, thank you for your

18:40

service. Appreciate you.

18:43

>> Thank you. Uh Councilman Rodriguez, any

18:46

questions?

18:48

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh thank you

18:50

chair Walker for joining us this uh

18:52

evening. It was amazing attending the

18:54

first official cleak session and seeing

18:57

you know the first procedures going

18:58

along as one of the champions for the

19:01

initial bill 8 of 25. It's just amazing

19:04

to see this thing up and running with

19:06

legs. Although it's still in infasy

19:08

stage I just look forward to seeing the

19:10

amazing work you guys are going to do on

19:12

that board. So thank you for everything.

19:14

>> You're welcome.

19:17

>> Thank you Councilwoman Ross. Any

19:19

questions?

19:20

>> Uh, good evening. Uh, Mr. Walker, thank

19:23

you for, uh, coming in today to explain

19:25

more about, uh, the cle board. I don't

19:28

have any questions.

19:30

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

19:33

questions?

19:34

>> Thank you, President Hill. How are you,

19:36

uh, Coach Mechi? Still weird to call you

19:39

Mr. Walker, so I'll stick with Coach

19:41

Mechi. Um, thank you for your

19:44

willingness to serve and to take on a

19:45

leadership role on this board. Um, being

19:47

on a board or a commission is hard work

19:49

to begin with. Being an inaugural member

19:52

is a completely different ball game

19:54

because you're really setting that

19:55

foundation. Uh, we spent many years

19:57

putting this together on paper, but now

19:59

you get to like actually bring it to

20:00

fruition. Um, so I appreciate that the

20:03

work that you're doing as well as the

20:04

work that you've done in our community.

20:06

I don't really have uh many questions.

20:08

This is still in its infancy and I look

20:09

forward to working with you.

20:11

>> Thank you.

20:13

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

20:16

questions?

20:16

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening,

20:18

Mr. Walker.

20:19

>> Good evening, ma'am.

20:21

>> I may have missed this answer, but when

20:24

was the last uh public meeting?

20:28

>> Um, exactly. It was It was only like two

20:32

weeks ago maybe. And then um

20:34

>> Oh, two weeks ago.

20:36

>> Yes, I think. And it's

20:38

about two weeks ago. So, we have a

20:40

schedule for the rest of the year as

20:42

well. We'll be meeting on every third uh

20:44

Wednesday of the month. So, you know,

20:48

that's our tentative schedule. So, we'll

20:50

be um meeting, you know, this month as

20:52

well, the third here uh here at 6:00 uh

20:57

in the same location. So, please feel

21:00

free to come out, you know, and support

21:02

in any way you can and bring, you know,

21:04

any kind of questions or concerns, you

21:05

know, because you're part of this

21:06

community as well, you know, so we need

21:09

all the input we can get.

21:11

Thank you very much. Um,

21:14

and is the information in here in terms

21:18

of like I'm just wondering the times

21:21

maybe not but

21:23

>> the meeting um times and schedule is not

21:26

included. This is just an overview of

21:29

each of the uh boards and commissions.

21:32

It provides their general function and

21:34

then shares their formal reports and

21:36

advice provided. Then uh generally

21:40

there's a second page with each one that

21:42

includes the seats and composition, the

21:44

meeting schedule um and then the current

21:47

members.

21:49

>> Thank you. And thank you Mr. Walker.

21:51

I'll plan to attend one of your

21:53

meetings.

21:54

>> Thank you.

21:55

>> Thank you. I just wanted to note Mr.

21:57

Walker shared that the cle board is

22:01

comprised of nine members. So, seven

22:04

were appointed by council and two

22:05

atlarge appointments uh were made by the

22:08

committee and their term length is three

22:11

years. So, I just wanted to note that.

22:14

Thank you.

22:15

>> Okay.

22:16

>> Thanks for being here this evening. You

22:18

too.

22:18

>> Appreciate it.

22:20

>> Next, we have the environmental advisory

22:23

council.

22:37

Good evening. Good evening, council.

22:40

>> Good evening.

22:40

>> Pamela Parson, and I'm representing the

22:43

environmental advisory board tonight.

22:46

Um,

22:48

Rafika Muhammad, who I believe was the

22:50

last chair, was hoping to be here

22:53

tonight and she could not be and asked

22:55

me if I would come in herstead. I'd like

22:59

to start out by saying I I pulled up

23:02

from the city's website today uh what it

23:06

says about the environmental advisory

23:10

council and particularly the members and

23:14

terms. Uh it lists uh both Rafika

23:18

Muhammad and Leland Nelson as their

23:21

terms expiring in 2021.

23:24

And I know that Rafika was uh

23:27

reappointed when we were and it lists uh

23:31

for vacancies. According to what's on

23:35

the website, there are seven volunteer

23:38

members of which three are appointed by

23:41

the mayor and four are appointed by city

23:44

council. And this says the EAC was

23:48

established for the purpose of

23:50

overseeing, discussing, and

23:52

disseminating information on

23:54

environmental issues in the city. And

23:57

the EAC shall consist of these seven

24:00

members. Um, in response to your

24:04

questions, I I started with that preface

24:07

because we have never met since um my

24:12

appointment. So, I will answer your

24:15

questions to the best of my ability

24:18

based on what I think the council should

24:21

do, but I don't really know for sure. In

24:25

terms of um

24:28

general function, it is my understanding

24:31

that the EAC covers environmental and

24:34

sustainability efforts in the city, both

24:37

initiating projects and programs on

24:40

their own and bringing them forth to the

24:42

city and supporting and promoting um

24:47

things that the city that is created

24:49

inhouse in the city as well as

24:52

supporting and promoting

24:54

uh other organizations projects that

24:58

operate within the city.

25:00

In terms of our current member

25:03

membership status,

25:05

um I think there is one person that I've

25:10

never met that we've never met whose

25:14

name I'm not even sure of. And then

25:17

there's Katherine Scott, Rafika

25:19

Muhammad, and I. And we were all

25:22

appointed by council at the same time,

25:24

and I believe our terms expire in 2027

25:29

or 2028.

25:31

In terms of public engagement, again, we

25:34

have never met since uh we have been

25:37

appointed or reappointed in Rafikica's

25:40

case. Um, and I believe that our

25:43

meetings would and should be open to the

25:46

public. Um, as we would be covered by

25:49

the Sunshine Act. Um, in terms of

25:53

reporting structure,

25:55

again, I believe that in addition to

25:58

making regular reports to council, and I

26:01

would, excuse me, I would assume those

26:04

would be quarterly because that's sort

26:06

of when council likes to see things. Um,

26:10

that our committee also relates directly

26:13

with the sustainability coordinator whom

26:16

we've never met.

26:19

And so there might be other reporting

26:21

requirements that might be um made

26:25

around a grant or something like that.

26:28

In terms of qualification for

26:30

appointments, again, I've never seen

26:32

anything that says that these particular

26:35

things are what would be used to

26:38

appointing someone, but I would say that

26:41

the most desirable experiences and

26:45

characteristics of an EAC member would

26:48

be experience and commitment to the

26:51

environment, especially understanding

26:54

and appreciating how that plays out in

26:56

an urban setting.

26:58

and in multicultural

27:00

um neighborhoods. Some understanding of

27:03

environmental racism and environmental

27:05

justice would be strongly encouraged and

27:10

backgrounds and experience should be

27:11

diverse and varied from gardeners and

27:14

farmers to photographers

27:17

and artists to environmental educators

27:21

and designers to burers and all types of

27:25

conservationists.

27:26

This committee embraces I would hope

27:30

both those who have formal training in

27:32

the things I have mentioned as well as

27:35

those who would have uh lived

27:38

experiences

27:39

that would uh relate to the committee's

27:43

work and I rafica and I thought that out

27:48

of the box urban environmental thinkers

27:50

should be encouraged to apply and that

27:55

is what I'm able to share. share on you

27:57

share with you based on my understanding

27:59

of what the committee does.

28:01

>> Thank you very much. Thanks for being

28:03

here this evening. Uh let me start by

28:06

clarifying the general function. Um

28:08

since the committee has not met, it is

28:12

intended to meet monthly or as needed to

28:15

address environmental issues and provide

28:17

input on city practices.

28:19

The council should prepare, adopt, and

28:22

revise bylaws to govern its operations,

28:26

advise on waste management and recycling

28:29

matters with emphasis on public

28:32

education.

28:34

Uh, the council may invite

28:35

representatives from city departments,

28:37

the Lancaster County Solid Waste

28:39

Management Authority, and the

28:41

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental

28:44

Protection to provide reports and

28:46

updates on city facilities. Review and

28:49

authorize grant applications for

28:51

environmental projects subject to

28:54

council approval and ensure city

28:57

residents receive by annual recycling

29:00

and environmental education materials

29:02

included with sanitation billings or the

29:06

city's events calendar.

29:08

In terms of formal reports and advice

29:11

provided, uh the environmental advisory

29:16

council should submit an activity

29:18

report. Um it should be provided to city

29:22

council upon request. Educational

29:25

publications should be sent to all city

29:27

residents via sanitation billings and

29:30

other city publications either by

29:33

annually at the request of the EAC.

29:37

Finally, environmental notices should be

29:40

received from the city clerk and

29:42

reviewed by the EAC. An example would be

29:45

a leaking underground storage tank or D

29:49

site reports. So, I just wanted to note

29:51

that

29:54

this council is comprised of seven

29:56

members. Three are appointed by the

29:58

mayor and four are appointed by council.

30:01

the individual that you mentioned that

30:03

you have never met, her name is Cheyenne

30:06

Johnson and she um her term expires

30:10

April 7th, 2028. She was uh appointed

30:15

earlier this year by council. Um your

30:18

term

30:19

uh Miss Muhammed and Miss Scott's terms

30:23

all expire on January 1st, 2027. So you

30:27

were correct there. Um it's in limbo

30:30

because while you have a quorum, the

30:34

city's uh sustainability coordinator,

30:37

they do have one. Her name is Maline

30:39

Good. She couldn't join us this evening.

30:41

So I'm hopeful that she is your liaison

30:44

um between the administration and the

30:48

environmental advisory council. So

30:50

hopefully she'll be in touch soon

30:51

because you do have a quorum and you

30:53

could conduct business or host meetings.

30:56

uh the three vacancies are the three

30:59

appointments that are needed uh from the

31:02

mayor. So that's out of our control, but

31:06

hopefully Matteline Good will be in

31:08

touch soon. Um I will open the floor to

31:11

questions from my colleagues. This time

31:13

I'll start with Councilwoman Ross who

31:16

serves as our parks, recreation, and

31:19

enrichment uh committee chair.

31:25

Thank you, President Hill. Um, thank

31:27

you, uh, Chair Parsons, for coming in

31:30

and, um, speaking to us about, um, the

31:33

the board you're currently sitting on

31:35

and, um, just giving us some updates on

31:38

things that you haven't been able to

31:40

accomplish or that you weren't sure

31:42

about. Um, cuz that's what we're here

31:44

for, too, to help you out. So, I know

31:46

that you said that um you hadn't um

31:49

spoken with the city um

31:52

Oh, I'm sorry. It just slipped my mind,

31:54

but you just said it. This

31:55

sustainability coordinator. Correct.

31:57

Yes. Sorry, it went right past me for a

32:00

minute. Um I will definitely reach out

32:02

to um see why they haven't met with you

32:05

um and also see you know uh when they

32:08

will be meeting with you because that's

32:09

very important um for the environmental

32:12

board and for uh them to converse with

32:15

you. Um uh so I will reach out and see

32:18

what's happening on that end and try to

32:20

get some answers for you. But um thank

32:22

you President Hill for the updates that

32:24

you just gave. Um, I don't have any

32:26

questions, but of course, um, Chair

32:28

Parsons, if you need anything, if there

32:30

any way I can help, please reach out to

32:32

me. Um, and I will, uh, do whatever I

32:35

can.

32:37

>> Let me, let me be clear that I am not

32:40

the chair. I am just the person who is

32:42

available to come tonight. And I believe

32:46

that the committee's last chair was

32:49

Rafika Muhammad.

32:51

>> Thank you for clearing that up. I

32:54

appreciate that.

32:56

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

32:59

questions?

33:02

>> Thank you, Madam President. Thank you,

33:03

Miss Parsons, for joining us. Um, I

33:06

actually la about a month ago uh was

33:09

trying to put this together with Mr.

33:10

Trudale, reached out to the mayor's

33:12

office um and let them know that there

33:14

is a quorum now. So, she did let me know

33:17

personally she'll reach out to the

33:18

sustainability coordinator to get it up

33:20

and running. Not sure what that timeline

33:22

looks like, but as uh Councilwoman Ross

33:25

indicated, I wouldn't mind setting up

33:27

some meetings with you to have followup

33:29

because I too would love to see the EAC

33:31

operational again. Thank you.

33:34

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

33:37

questions? Um yes, but I think it was

33:40

kind of answered um with those three

33:43

vacancies and um but knowing that you

33:45

guys have a quorum now um I would hope

33:48

that we can try to get something even

33:50

with the sustainability coordinator. So

33:53

as uh Councilwoman Ross and Councilwoman

33:55

I mean Councilman Rodriguez just stated

33:58

hopefully they they can work something

33:59

out with administration um because this

34:01

is an important board. This is I mean

34:04

all of them are but this is this one

34:06

right now in the times that we're living

34:07

in in in our environment uh uh in our

34:10

environment we see a lot of things

34:12

happening um you and I communicate a lot

34:15

uh about some of the environmental

34:16

things that we see in in in our

34:19

community. So I think you know any

34:21

system that's built is built to work

34:23

harmoniously. So this to me is our

34:26

kidney.

34:28

uh we have to keep flushing it right now

34:30

until you know we we're on dialysis. But

34:33

I believe that um that this is a a board

34:36

and I hope you guys really can get

34:37

something scheduled and um we're here to

34:40

help in any any way that we possibly

34:42

can. So um again, thank you for your

34:45

service and being someone that's uh

34:47

truly concerned not just about our

34:48

environment but as our city as a whole.

34:50

So thank you.

34:53

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

34:55

questions? Thank you very much,

34:57

President Hill. Um, I don't have any

34:59

questions for you. Uh, I thank you for

35:00

being here tonight. I thank you for your

35:01

willingness to serve. Um, and I thank

35:03

you for your honesty, uh, you know, for

35:05

not coming here and trying to act like,

35:07

oh, yeah, we've been doing all these

35:08

things, but just for being honest and

35:10

letting us know what's going on so we

35:11

can help you, uh, and the board to move

35:13

forward in any way we can. So, I

35:15

appreciate you. Thank you.

35:17

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

35:19

questions?

35:20

>> Thank you, President Hill. Thank you for

35:22

being here this evening, Miss Parsons.

35:24

Um, no questions. Just uh reading

35:27

through the general functions. I'd like

35:30

to see the board also up and running.

35:32

It's very important that our residents,

35:35

all of us in our community get educated

35:37

on some of the environmental dangers,

35:41

injustices,

35:43

um, sanitation, and whatever else that

35:47

we can learn from this department. So,

35:50

thank you for being here again.

35:52

>> Thank you. Thank you, council. I think

35:54

the board really does want to meet and

35:57

so we appreciate that you're making this

35:59

happen. Thank you.

36:01

>> Thank you.

36:02

>> Next, we have the Harrisburg

36:04

Redevelopment Authority.

36:40

Good evening, council president and

36:42

council members.

36:44

>> Good evening.

36:44

>> Nice to see you all.

36:46

My name is Brian Davis. I'm the

36:48

executive director for the Harrisburg

36:49

Redevelopment Authority. And uh with

36:52

with me tonight, uh my board members

36:54

from the authority could not make it.

36:56

But tonight, we'll also as a component

36:59

unit of the authority, you might

37:00

remember that the city of Harrisburg has

37:02

established a land bank. So they are

37:06

very similar in their operations and

37:09

their goals, objectives. uh there are a

37:12

couple of differences that uh you know

37:16

by us having a land bank it adds value

37:17

to what we can do with elimination of

37:19

blight and for urban renewal activities.

37:22

So I tried to we tried to give you on

37:26

the verse first first page of this

37:27

outline the the key questions that were

37:29

asked of us. At the top talks about the

37:33

redevelopment authority and the bottom

37:34

half is the land bank. Excuse my voice.

37:37

I'm getting over a cold so sorry about

37:40

that. And

37:43

for both of them uh I think it's

37:46

important to keep in mind that neither

37:48

one is considered a municipal authority

37:50

in the commonwealth.

37:52

So the redevelopment authority itself is

37:55

considered an an agency of the

37:56

commonwealth and then the land bank is a

37:59

public body and body corporate politic

38:02

which is just slightly different from

38:04

municipal authorities. So that's you

38:06

know a little legal detail but I like to

38:08

point that out. Now, for the

38:10

redevelopment authority, as far as our

38:12

board membership is concerned, we have

38:15

five slots and we currently have three

38:18

that are filled and two that are vacant.

38:20

We do have staggered

38:22

services. It's a five-year term and

38:25

they're all staggered. And the second

38:27

page of this, which you may have already

38:28

seen, has an outline of what the current

38:31

members who they are and their terms and

38:34

then the vacancies that we have that

38:35

need to be filled. And on that second

38:38

page at the bottom, we also show that

38:41

the the board of directors of the

38:44

redevelopment authority serve as the

38:46

core board members for the land bank.

38:49

And then we have two additional land

38:51

bank appointees from the mayor. So to

38:54

summarize, all five members of the

38:56

redevelopment authority are appointees

38:58

by city council.

39:01

All those members are also members of

39:03

the seven member land bank which adds

39:05

two appointees from the mayor's office.

39:08

Okay.

39:10

So, and I h you know you've we I've been

39:15

here before and shared a few things

39:17

about the projects that we've done. Uh a

39:20

lot of our activities are driven and

39:22

conducted under the you know

39:24

collaboration carrying and cooperation

39:27

and carrying out really the urban

39:29

renewal plans of the city of Harrisburg

39:32

and primarily for the elimination of

39:34

blight in acquiring and disposing of

39:36

properties that are blighting our

39:37

neighborhoods and uh you know

39:40

contributing to urban decay,

39:42

contributing to crime. But our goal is

39:44

for neighborhood stabilization. So both

39:47

the land bank and the redevelopment

39:49

authority uh that's their core function

39:53

as far as reporting goes on a technical

39:56

level both are to report to the

39:58

department uh Pennsylvania department of

40:00

community economic development as a

40:02

practical matter the activities that we

40:05

are engaged in

40:08

uh they will go primarily principally

40:11

it's going through the approval process

40:14

say the planning commission zoning

40:16

hearing ing board. When we're talking

40:18

real estate as a practical matter, we'll

40:21

have a lot of different methods for

40:22

acquiring blighted properties. But once

40:25

we get investors in or private sector

40:28

people to purchase the properties, they

40:31

of course have to go through the whole

40:33

process for approvals for whatever is

40:34

being built, whether it's affordable

40:36

housing or whether it's mixed use or

40:39

whether it's a a new park.

40:42

So uh those are uh you know high level

40:47

just kind of uh explanation of the two

40:49

organizations you can see how they're

40:51

very much related in their activities

40:53

their go core functions qualifications

40:56

are differ slightly I thought that I

40:58

would for the land bank just uh give the

41:01

full language that's in the city

41:02

ordinance as far as you know the

41:04

qualifications for members of the land

41:06

bank for the redevelopment authority

41:08

board it's straightforward they're all

41:10

appointed by council

41:12

All five members are appointed by

41:13

council and I must be one of two things.

41:16

I must be a resident of the city or my

41:19

business must be in the city proper.

41:21

That's for five redevelopment authority

41:23

board members. A little bit more

41:24

detailed for the qualifications

41:27

uh of the land bank. However, that tends

41:30

to be a default setting for the two

41:32

mayoral appointees. And you know, just

41:35

as another practical matter, and if

41:38

we're going to talk about

41:41

uh best candidates

41:44

for both of these boards, it's really

41:46

helpful if they have some experience in

41:49

real estate,

41:51

um affordable housing development,

41:55

um understanding,

41:57

you know, the process that developers

42:00

must go through for for local government

42:02

approvals.

42:04

Um, we've also had occasionally uh

42:08

attorneys on the board that had

42:10

experience in real estate.

42:14

So that really helps us to navigate

42:18

the specific complexities of that

42:21

industry and of dealing with blight and

42:24

the legal uh you know the legal context

42:28

that not just the acquisition but also

42:30

the disposition has to has to take place

42:32

in.

42:33

And uh I'll also wanted to point out

42:36

just like three good examples of of you

42:38

know things that we're working on so you

42:40

have a sense for that. The first one is

42:42

what we call quality of life. We along

42:45

with the land bank both the land bank

42:47

and the redevelopment authority have

42:48

assembled some vacant lots on south 15th

42:50

street and satara street where uh with

42:53

the part with the park parks partnership

42:56

team and the fundraising that they've

42:58

done are designing a new pocket park a

43:01

small park for the neighborhood. So

43:04

that's been under works for some time,

43:05

but that's an example where we actively

43:08

looked for land that was available on

43:10

the Dolphin County repository list that

43:13

would fit the needs of the community in

43:15

a direct response to a community request

43:17

for additional park space in that area.

43:22

So that's that's an example of a parks.

43:25

Another example is um Governor Square is

43:31

actually

43:32

an example of where in 2003

43:36

we were a part of assembling that land

43:38

and HUD originally would not just give

43:41

the land to a developer. It had to come

43:42

to the redevelopment authority first

43:45

along with uh grant funds that came from

43:48

HUD. Now we're in the throws of it

43:52

coming out the other end of the owner

43:54

after all those years allowing it just

43:55

to fall into disrepair and going into

43:57

bankruptcy. And now we're in that mix as

44:01

well because of that grant money that

44:03

came into the project. So, one of our uh

44:06

you know, one of the things that we're

44:09

um involved with and will stay actively

44:13

at the table on is how that gets

44:15

resolved and repurposed to be renewed

44:19

with another qualified buyer or

44:22

developer

44:24

and especially in the sense that I know

44:25

right now the receiver the front end is

44:28

heavy on assessing all the existing

44:29

conditions and what needs to be repaired

44:31

and making sure the families are safe

44:33

that are where that's not so much our

44:35

role. Our role is that uh parallel track

44:38

that looks at okay once it's stabilized

44:41

then how do we get the whole thing

44:43

redeveloped and back completely on the

44:46

market and that's when we'll be at the

44:47

table along with HUD and along with

44:49

PHFA.

44:51

The last example I'll give is

44:54

uh it can be just as small as us

44:56

acquiring some land for our our partner

44:58

nonprofits like Tri County Housing or

45:00

for Habitat for Humanity. Over the

45:02

years, we've acquired, you know,

45:04

properties for either each of them. And

45:07

the land bank has done that twice for

45:09

Tri County Housing and getting land so

45:11

they could build new houses on Sutara

45:12

Street and the redevelopment authority.

45:15

We recently had Tri County Housing start

45:18

construction on North Fourth Street,

45:20

2100 block with five new houses there.

45:23

So, those are like three really good I

45:25

thought nut, you know, in a nutshell

45:27

examples of what our activities

45:30

embrace. Um, I would like to mention

45:32

that Jackie Parker is here as a member

45:34

of the land bank and I thought maybe

45:36

she'd like to say a few words about the

45:38

land bank.

45:39

>> Sure, that's fine.

45:41

>> Good evening.

45:42

>> Good evening, council.

45:43

>> It's been a while since I've sat on this

45:45

side. Um, I worked for the city of

45:47

Harrisburg from 2014 to 2019. Um, and I

45:51

think that, um, as as Brian was saying,

45:54

you know, we did, um, a lot of different

45:56

things, but this creating the land bank

45:58

in 2014, I think was a significant step

46:00

for the redevelopment authority for

46:02

community and economic development for

46:04

the city of Harrisburg. We did have to

46:06

go um to the county for approval and

46:09

also for the the school district because

46:12

we do have the opportunity to if we do

46:14

some big developments, we can share in

46:16

the tax um, income as it goes back on

46:19

the on the tax roles. Um I think Brian

46:22

mentioned most of the things that we did

46:24

back in the back in those days, but one

46:26

of the things that I I was happy to do

46:28

was and right at the beginning when we

46:30

created the land bank was to help with

46:32

the sink holes that were down on 14th

46:34

Street. Um and we were able to help with

46:36

the whole assembly because the land bank

46:39

was in place and we were able to take

46:40

some of those parcels off the tax roles

46:42

before we had outsiders that were going

46:44

to come in and take them. And I think

46:46

that is really one one of the biggest

46:48

benefits of having a land bank is

46:50

working with the county and looking at

46:52

um you know the tax um lists as they

46:55

come in and and and you know preempting

46:59

any outsiders from taking some important

47:01

properties that we might be interested

47:04

in for assembly. And um again the

47:07

legislation was created in 20 for the

47:10

state was created in 2012 and it really

47:12

is very permissive in that it allows a

47:14

community like the city of Harrisburg to

47:17

um work with redevelopment authority

47:19

work with the city's mission with their

47:22

vision and and to be able to kind of

47:24

maneuver and take some of these

47:26

properties that are so important for

47:27

accumulation for larger projects. So I

47:30

think the 14th Street, the sinkholes was

47:32

it was really great that we had that in

47:34

place at that time. Um and I think Brian

47:36

did mention about HDC. We helped them

47:39

assemble for those um for the properties

47:41

that they wanted to to do on SWAR. Um

47:43

and also in Midtown we acquired some

47:46

properties to assemble again for

47:48

redevelopment.

47:49

So

47:52

>> thank you.

47:55

Uh I don't have any immediate questions.

47:59

Um, I'm going to defer to our building

48:02

and housing committee chair,

48:05

Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

48:07

questions?

48:08

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

48:10

Thank you for being here this evening.

48:13

You mentioned HDC, Harrisburg

48:16

>> Housing,

48:16

>> Housing Development Corporation.

48:18

>> Thank you for that because I was unaware

48:21

of what that term.

48:22

>> Um, I don't have any other questions

48:24

right now. Thank you.

48:27

Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

48:29

questions?

48:30

>> Thank you all. Thank you for being here

48:32

tonight. Uh, just a couple couple of

48:34

questions. Uh, as far as the H owned

48:36

properties, are there is there a public

48:38

list that people can look at to see what

48:40

properties are owned by HA?

48:41

>> We have a public list that we can give

48:43

on request. It's it's, you know, it's

48:47

it's not posted per se on ongoing, but

48:51

it is something that's available upon

48:52

request. Yes.

48:53

>> Okay. Um, I'd like to request it. Sure.

48:55

um it it be given to the council city

48:58

council clerk so that it can be posted

48:59

on the city council's website. I think

49:01

it's important for the public just to be

49:02

aware uh so that if someone wants to

49:04

work with HR they can you know reach

49:08

out. Um that's the second question. How

49:10

would someone work with you or reach out

49:11

if they were looking to do a partnership

49:13

with HA?

49:14

>> We receive quite a few cold calls and

49:16

also calls from people who are in the

49:18

industry routinely. So, and this

49:21

whenever they they can call, they can

49:24

email, they can come to our monthly

49:26

meetings that are public. Um, and then

49:29

we'll really work hard with them to

49:33

understand what their needs are. Um, I

49:37

frequently find that, uh, you know, we

49:41

have a vision of what we'd like to do or

49:43

a service that like we'd like to

49:45

provide, but we don't often have an idea

49:48

what that means as far as facility size,

49:51

location, um, off street parking, just

49:54

the details that have to do with the

49:56

real estate side. So I, you know, we'll

49:58

we'll spend as much time as someone

50:00

might need as far as working through

50:02

that and then letting them know not only

50:04

what our resources are because I have a

50:06

short list of everything that's

50:07

available today. So that might be like

50:10

80 80 or 90 parcels, okay? But so I'll

50:14

share that this is what we have today.

50:16

>> But we'll also point out other resources

50:17

that are available from the county's

50:20

perspective. They of course have the

50:21

repository list, but they also have

50:23

their twice a year tax sales. So we'll

50:26

also share that information and then

50:28

we'll also walk walk anybody through the

50:31

process of you know for for us to sell

50:34

property we have to get board approval

50:36

of course. So there's a process there

50:38

that you know that's two-page process a

50:41

two-step process that we share we walk

50:43

people through with that as well. So,

50:45

uh, that's how it happens. And, you

50:48

know, as they're preparing their their

50:50

package or their proposal for it for,

50:53

uh, to purchase one of our properties,

50:55

we'll even work with them on each of

50:57

those different components, you know,

50:59

and it's it's just for the sake of so

51:02

everybody knows, the first step is a

51:04

preliminary step where we look at is it

51:06

preliminarily feasible. So, we're just

51:09

looking at your preliminary financing

51:10

plan, preliminary sketches, does this

51:13

make sense financially and does it make

51:14

sense from a zoning and planning

51:17

commission standpoint. A lot of projects

51:19

do meet that threshold, then we'll take

51:21

that then I'll go to my board. will get

51:23

a a a resolution that will put make them

51:27

a potential developer, take it off the

51:29

market temporarily, but doesn't

51:30

authorize a transfer of the deed, but

51:32

that gives them time to finalize all of

51:34

their financing, get all of their plans,

51:36

specifications done, line up any

51:40

partnerships that they might need. Say

51:41

it's a affordable housing project, they

51:44

will have to have uh you know, property

51:46

management company, they'll have to have

51:47

PHFA approved, all those things. So we

51:50

give them that am additional amount of

51:51

time just to get that all all in line.

51:54

Depending on the complexity of it, it

51:55

may take several years for someone to

51:57

finalize it because JMBB Gardens is a

52:00

good example on North Sixth Street. That

52:01

took over two years for the financing

52:03

get together. There have been other

52:05

affordable projects that take three or

52:07

four years until they can get the

52:08

financing. But I'm sorry for that

52:10

long-winded explanation, but it is um

52:13

it's it's something that we do pretty

52:15

much every day.

52:16

>> Okay. Um it wasn't long-winded. Details

52:18

are important. So, I appreciate you

52:19

taking the time to uh walk us through

52:21

it. Um, you you said about how how

52:23

people reach out to you generally. Where

52:26

would someone find the contact

52:27

information? Like, is it a website?

52:29

Like, if I don't have your phone number,

52:30

how would I reach out to you? Or if I

52:31

don't have your email address, how do I

52:33

find it?

52:33

>> It it's quick. Um, it we do have a

52:36

website.

52:36

>> Okay.

52:37

>> And uh that's how many people find us uh

52:40

just by googling and they find our

52:41

information.

52:42

>> For the longest time, we were also

52:44

provided the support coalition on

52:47

homelessness. So our information is also

52:48

at HUD. So also take some calls from

52:51

people from out of state that just see

52:53

our our information on HUD's website. So

52:56

>> Okay. Thank you very much. I don't have

52:59

any further questions at this time.

53:01

>> Thank you. Uh Councilwoman Ross, any

53:04

questions?

53:12

>> Okay. Councilman Rodriguez. I'm sorry. I

53:15

did I could it was not um letting me

53:18

unmute myself. I'm so sorry.

53:20

>> It's okay.

53:21

>> Um uh um good evening. Thank you both

53:24

for being here today to explain more to

53:26

us about H. I think it's such a

53:29

important part of our city. Um

53:32

especially since um we do have an issue

53:34

with blight. Um we do have an issue with

53:38

um rebuilding and using the blight that

53:41

we have in a way where we can rebuild

53:43

our community. I think that's really

53:45

important. Um, thank you also, uh, Vice

53:48

President Green for asking for a list. I

53:50

know we asked that, I think last time to

53:52

have it posted, um, just so the

53:54

community and residents can see what

53:57

properties are on the list. Um, so, um,

54:00

they could easily say, okay, I would

54:03

like to, you know, redevelop that that

54:05

piece of, um, land or that, um, blighted

54:08

area. So, um, yeah, I would love to see

54:11

a list be online. I know that um I tried

54:15

to um also get a parcel of land to build

54:19

my own house in the city. Um so what I

54:21

would just say to that was very

54:23

difficult process and I think um there

54:27

should be different qualifications for a

54:29

resident who's just trying to build a

54:30

house and a developer who's trying to

54:32

develop land. I don't think they should

54:34

have the same requirements and the same

54:37

process to go through. Um the process

54:40

was very lengthy. It was very hard to

54:42

even find an architect to come into the

54:44

city because of all of the um ordinances

54:48

we have when it comes to building that

54:50

also need to be updated. So I would say

54:53

it was not an easy process and I think

54:55

we want to promote our residents to want

54:57

to build houses in the city. Um I think

54:59

that will also help with um the parcels

55:02

we have that are not being used and also

55:04

the blighted land that we have. So um I

55:08

would just you know thank you so much

55:09

for coming in. Like I said, it's a very

55:11

important board, but I do I would like

55:14

to see some, if it's possible, um

55:17

different qualifications for residents

55:19

who want to simply build their own house

55:21

and um developers who are developing

55:24

large large parcels of land. So, um that

55:28

I didn't have any questions. I just

55:30

wanted to see if that was possible. And

55:33

um that was it for me.

55:37

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

55:39

questions?

55:41

>> Thank you, Madam President, and of

55:42

course, thank you both for joining us

55:44

this evening. Um, just pretty much

55:46

echoing the same sentiments. It'd be

55:47

great to see a repository of what the uh

55:51

H does have on hand. Um, just to have

55:54

that information for the public and, you

55:56

know, it's definitely great to hear

55:57

about the land bank. I definitely know

55:59

how that could be vital to the

56:01

development and growth of Harrisburg.

56:02

So, uh, just thank you and hopefully we

56:05

can get that list.

56:08

Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

56:10

questions?

56:11

>> Yes. Um, thank you both for coming.

56:14

Thank you both for your service. Um, you

56:17

probably be hearing that a lot tonight.

56:18

Uh, but one of the things I'm just want

56:21

to take a little deeper dive. I have a

56:23

couple questions and hopefully that you

56:25

can um answer not only for my own

56:27

edification, but for the public as well.

56:30

Um,

56:32

does the H have a budget?

56:36

We do have an annual budget every year.

56:39

Um it's it's about $430,000

56:43

a year and that covers staff and uh

56:47

staff cost, incidental cost and legal

56:49

cost that we have for a year.

56:51

>> Okay. So, um I mean far as like this is

56:53

how I I'm just going to give you my how

56:55

I envision HA.

56:58

um when we have a land bank and we have

57:01

these uh parcels that are out here and

57:03

you know one of the things that you guys

57:06

um functions are is revitalizing uh the

57:09

city. So with that and we know we need

57:13

downtown revitalized. We need Allison

57:15

Hill. We need the city itself

57:18

revitalized and just outside of knocking

57:21

down p properties to remove blight. are

57:23

we packaging

57:25

these pro these parcels and these

57:27

properties to to to see developers come

57:30

in? Um, and that's why I'm looking at a

57:33

budget to see if we if if it's grass and

57:35

all of these different things that we

57:36

have to maintain and package something

57:39

for like a

57:41

a mall, somebody to come in and say,

57:43

"Hey, we here's what we packaged up

57:45

together to look at this." Are we are we

57:47

doing

57:49

>> Yeah, I I'm glad you raised that

57:50

question because it speaks to the nature

57:53

of funding for uh our real estate

57:56

transactions, the real estate activities

57:59

we have. In order for us to acquire

58:01

properties, we need to have the money.

58:03

So, we need to identify funds. It may be

58:06

funds that the city sets aside from its

58:08

CDBG home, from its CDBG funds, which

58:11

has happened in the past. We may be able

58:14

to use funds from the Commonwealth

58:16

applying for funds. It's a little bit

58:18

more difficult to have acquisition funds

58:19

and demolition funds, but we have to do

58:22

the oldfashioned thing and apply for

58:23

funds from the Commonwealth or from the

58:25

federal government to do this work. a

58:27

good example that we're going through

58:29

right now. It might seem

58:33

um

58:35

it it is a true urban renewal activity

58:39

with the Paxton Creek Regionalization

58:42

where we own very little of the land

58:45

around the creek as the redevelopment

58:47

authority does. However, we've assembled

58:50

a partnership and we've received grant

58:52

funds to begin the work of environmental

58:56

assessment um acquisition, some

58:59

acquisition as well as engineering work

59:02

that's needed for um for taking that

59:05

creek, that channel of the Paxton Creek

59:07

that was built in 1910 and it's

59:09

collapsing in different places that is

59:11

so obsolete and from the 1972 flood just

59:16

which devastated all of Pax, all of

59:19

Cameron Street, right? It never really

59:20

recovered. And because of that flooding,

59:24

uh, the flooding condition and all of

59:27

the flood maps that have existed ever

59:28

since, the city of Harrisburg as well as

59:31

the redevelopment authority as well as

59:33

uh, Capitol Region Water from the

59:35

standpoint of their intercept needing to

59:37

be replaced to repair that long-term

59:39

planning for flood mitigation and also

59:42

to mitigate uh, contaminants in the

59:44

Sesana River. We've also partnered with

59:47

the city engineers office in this very

59:50

complex uh plan to remove that channel

59:56

and renaturalize the creek creating a

59:59

new green belt through there which will

1:00:02

simultaneously do it in such a manner

1:00:04

that it will lower the flood stage and

1:00:08

raise about 200 parcels along the Paxton

1:00:10

Creek out of the floodway and then

1:00:13

available again for new development.

1:00:15

velment which is really a huge economic

1:00:19

development project in the city. But I

1:00:21

give that as an eth because the way we

1:00:23

pay for that is through grants through

1:00:26

uh we've gotten awarded uh funding from

1:00:29

the commonwealth redevelopment

1:00:30

assistance capital program funds. We

1:00:32

received EPA funds. We've also received

1:00:35

FEMA funds which we're waiting for that

1:00:37

contract to be signed because that's

1:00:39

going to give us it builds on work that

1:00:41

PENDOT did many years ago. They really

1:00:44

set the stage in paying for so much of

1:00:47

the engineering work preliminarily that

1:00:50

we've been able to build on that so that

1:00:52

now we're at the point where this next

1:00:54

funding trunch that we get we can

1:00:57

actually start to see what the final

1:00:59

design will look like. So it's a really

1:01:02

good question. I mean that on a smaller

1:01:05

scale, you know, that happens with other

1:01:07

projects like at Midtown and

1:01:09

Marketplace. We bundled those. We had to

1:01:10

assemble in we had enough contiguous

1:01:13

property that we could put out on an RFP

1:01:15

and find a developer that would invest

1:01:17

in the city.

1:01:17

>> And I was and I appreciate that

1:01:19

explanation because I was uh again

1:01:21

that's how I saw this functioning and

1:01:24

I'm glad you were able to and not only

1:01:26

myself just again for for for the public

1:01:28

stance. Um but uh one of the other

1:01:31

things is I hope again um I know you

1:01:33

were here in 24

1:01:36

when we uh introduced uh Naka. Um that's

1:01:39

something um I think that we're still

1:01:41

looking at um being able to offer our uh

1:01:44

residents and some of those blighted

1:01:46

homes uh those houses for $1. Um I think

1:01:49

you really appreciated that plan. Um,

1:01:52

so, uh, but the other thing I would ask

1:01:55

is, um, there's two more questions and I

1:01:58

don't want to make this lengthy, but I

1:02:00

really have to ask these questions. Um,

1:02:02

when is the when is the last time and on

1:02:04

I see one of your, um, organization's

1:02:07

um, overview uh, public uh, meetings.

1:02:10

When was the last time one of those

1:02:12

held? Uh we have monthly meetings for

1:02:16

both land bank and for the redevelopment

1:02:17

authority on the third Tuesday of each

1:02:19

month.

1:02:20

>> We we didn't have a meeting last month

1:02:22

because we didn't have any actionable

1:02:24

items.

1:02:24

>> Okay.

1:02:25

>> But we will have we had one the month

1:02:26

before.

1:02:27

>> They are

1:02:28

>> they are advertised.

1:02:29

>> Yep. They are they are

1:02:30

>> that was that was

1:02:31

>> they are advertised.

1:02:32

>> That was my next question. So again,

1:02:34

this is this is all for the public

1:02:36

because there are a lot of people and

1:02:37

I'm sure my colleagues get these

1:02:39

questions as well um that people are

1:02:41

looking to develop here and and there

1:02:43

seems like you know there's a wall that

1:02:46

they have to climb and so I'm just

1:02:48

hoping that this information can be u

1:02:50

put out not just on on the website. I

1:02:52

mean we we we all say that go to the

1:02:55

city's website and you can find but

1:02:57

sometimes you know um a lot of people

1:02:59

don't that's not the only source. So,

1:03:03

uh, that I think that we can get this

1:03:05

information out for the public to be

1:03:07

clearly aware of what's happening and

1:03:08

what's available. Um, because the goal

1:03:11

is again to get some of those

1:03:12

dilapitated properties back on the tax

1:03:15

road. Which brings me to my next

1:03:17

question. Um, I see that you mentioned

1:03:20

um that when you acquire uh some of this

1:03:22

property uh for nonprofits, and I don't

1:03:26

want to take away from nonprofits, but I

1:03:28

think that's one of the big issues that

1:03:30

we're having in our city. um with some

1:03:32

of the state buildings that are non-t

1:03:34

taxable and the nonprofit uh sector that

1:03:37

is nonprofitable. So um

1:03:41

that doesn't really help us on on on the

1:03:43

tax side of things. Go ahead. It looks

1:03:46

like you're you're ready to jump in.

1:03:48

Yeah, I I'll that's a very good question

1:03:52

because uh the the redevelopment

1:03:54

authority has a long-standing practice

1:03:57

that when we when we transfer a deed

1:03:59

from us to anybody else regardless of

1:04:02

their tax status, it remains taxable in

1:04:05

perpetuity.

1:04:07

Now, to more specific, your uh the

1:04:10

example of uh the land that we've

1:04:13

acquired, which hasn't been a lot for

1:04:14

the nonprofits to build on, those then

1:04:17

are houses that are sold to residents of

1:04:19

the city of Harrisburg, income eligible

1:04:21

residents, and they're taxable. Okay?

1:04:23

>> Right now, they'll benefit from the

1:04:24

10-year tax abatement that's in place

1:04:26

right now. Right? in that sense. I'm

1:04:30

just saying it was an incentive for

1:04:31

first-time home buyers or for low-income

1:04:33

families that that's very helpful.

1:04:36

>> So, when you're doing that, are you

1:04:37

working with the um fair housing

1:04:40

council?

1:04:40

>> It can be fair housing council. It can

1:04:42

be community action commission. It can

1:04:45

be Tri County now has their own housing

1:04:47

counseling arm as well. So, but it does

1:04:51

um I've seen all of them involved in

1:04:53

that different housing projects that

1:04:54

we've been a part of over the years.

1:04:56

Yeah.

1:04:57

>> Okay. there.

1:04:57

>> Um yeah, thank you for for um letting me

1:05:00

and again um the public know because

1:05:02

that's one of the things I think um

1:05:05

a lot of cities are having now,

1:05:07

especially with downtown and all of

1:05:09

these buildings getting reassessed.

1:05:10

There's millions of dollars just going

1:05:12

down the drain. Um and again, I think

1:05:14

the goal here as a city function that I

1:05:16

would love to see is to take a lot of

1:05:18

the strain off of of the homeowners

1:05:21

here. And um if our schools are failing

1:05:23

and we don't have a bunch of home, this

1:05:25

is why it's important to have you don't

1:05:26

understand this, right? This is why it's

1:05:28

important to have homeowners and get

1:05:29

people back into these homes to get it

1:05:31

back on the tax road that way. Um if if

1:05:34

our schools don't have money and they're

1:05:35

looking for uh the tax dollars to be

1:05:38

that source, we I think there's some

1:05:40

things readjustments that we have to do

1:05:42

as a city. Go ahead. You've touched on

1:05:44

three important points in that number

1:05:47

one is when we do neighborhood

1:05:49

stabilization,

1:05:51

we accomplish a great deal of that

1:05:52

through home ownership. Number one.

1:05:54

Number two, when we repurpose existing

1:05:57

buildings that are now defunct or not

1:05:59

being used for where their original

1:06:00

purposes, then we're also helping to

1:06:03

stabilize and improve the tax base.

1:06:05

Right. And then number three, which you

1:06:08

really didn't mention, but I I'd like to

1:06:10

add to that, is just that all of our

1:06:13

success we accomplish through

1:06:15

partnerships. We have not been able to

1:06:18

accomplish any successful story at all

1:06:21

without partnerships. Good.

1:06:22

>> So that's one of the first things that

1:06:24

people will read. It's it's a boring

1:06:27

read to visit our website, but that's

1:06:28

one of the first things you'll see is

1:06:30

that our success is because of our

1:06:32

partnerships and it and it because we're

1:06:34

a separate entity from the city, we're

1:06:36

able to point to well here if it's

1:06:38

affordable housing, here are the

1:06:40

resources that the city has. Home funds,

1:06:43

CDBG funds, um and it's not the city,

1:06:46

then we also have PHFA at the state

1:06:47

level and the federal level. We know

1:06:49

what sources there are to do just about

1:06:52

every project that there is. And so in a

1:06:55

sense that we don't host these, you

1:06:57

know, resources, but that we collaborate

1:07:00

so those partnerships actually deliver

1:07:02

for the city.

1:07:04

>> I like to point out to the homes that

1:07:06

are on SWAT with um HDC, the Housing

1:07:09

Development Corporation over the years,

1:07:10

they have been very strong partners with

1:07:12

us and they do manage to put those

1:07:15

funding pieces together, whether it is

1:07:16

PHFA or a little bit of from the city.

1:07:19

um and and they they know how to get

1:07:21

those resources and we help with those

1:07:23

kinds of things by having the land and

1:07:26

so they have come in I think they've

1:07:27

done five houses along there and they're

1:07:29

all for home ownership and then and and

1:07:31

as Brian said first-time home buyers so

1:07:33

>> thank you I really appreciate the

1:07:35

explanation um last thing I'll say is

1:07:38

that um you know I appreciate um go

1:07:41

after those grants keep going after them

1:07:43

right um and you mentioned something

1:07:45

about the CDBG funding um as of recent

1:07:48

you know Um, I see administration as

1:07:51

looking to kind of go away from the

1:07:52

nonprofit sector. I'm not going to say

1:07:54

it's in in its entirety, but um, if you

1:07:57

go back to the Reed era, he used a lot

1:07:59

of that CDBG money to develop things.

1:08:01

So, I think, um, having that, that's a

1:08:03

worthy conversation to make sure there's

1:08:05

some funds to help package some of these

1:08:07

uh, the land bank and parcels that we

1:08:10

have. So, developers and we have to give

1:08:13

them some type of incentive. It's good

1:08:14

for businesses. I mean developers, but

1:08:16

you know that's a whole another thing.

1:08:18

But uh thank you. Um that's all I have.

1:08:21

Um and I appreciate you guys doing what

1:08:22

you do. Thank you.

1:08:26

>> Thank you. Thank you both for being here

1:08:28

this evening and for sharing.

1:08:34

>> Next we have the Historic Architectural

1:08:37

Review Board, also known as HARB.

1:09:01

Good evening. I'm Trina Gribble. I

1:09:04

currently sit as the chair of the

1:09:06

Historic Architectural Review Board or

1:09:09

HARB. Um

1:09:14

so to go through some of your questions

1:09:17

um that were given to us in preparation.

1:09:21

Um the general function I just wanted to

1:09:24

mention um we are a an advisory board

1:09:30

and we have public meetings once a month

1:09:32

in these chambers

1:09:34

and uh sometimes we we

1:09:39

uh take an off month in December if we

1:09:40

don't have any business but um yes it's

1:09:43

a monthly meeting and our

1:09:45

recommendations that are decided in

1:09:48

those meetings then go to council for

1:09:50

ratification.

1:09:52

Uh currently the HARB is a group of

1:09:55

seven city residents or professionals

1:09:57

who volunteer.

1:09:59

Uh they are appointed um I believe by

1:10:02

the mayor. You can correct me on that

1:10:03

one. Um currently we have five members

1:10:08

on the board and we have two vacancies.

1:10:13

The terms are I believe three well they

1:10:16

are three years and I say I believe

1:10:18

because we've lost track. So because so

1:10:20

many of us have been on the board for

1:10:22

many many years. Um so I we haven't been

1:10:27

very deadfast in keeping track of when

1:10:30

they expire and when they renew. Uh we

1:10:34

do have one new member this year. Um the

1:10:37

the terms are in theory staggered. Um

1:10:41

the qualifications for appointment, we

1:10:43

have one position that is to be held by

1:10:45

an architect.

1:10:47

Uh we have one position that is a real

1:10:49

estate agent and the other is the city

1:10:52

code official sits on our board.

1:10:54

Um I believe those three professional

1:10:58

positions do not have to live in the

1:10:59

city but the other um four positions are

1:11:04

residents of the of the historic

1:11:06

districts.

1:11:09

So um the harb has purview over six

1:11:14

municipal historic districts.

1:11:17

They are Allison Hill, Box Ridge,

1:11:21

Harrisburg, Shyoke, Midtown, and Old

1:11:24

Uptown.

1:11:26

And these were en enacted uh in response

1:11:30

to the devastation of the hurricane

1:11:32

Agnes in 1972

1:11:35

um as a way to

1:11:38

revitalize the city and also to preserve

1:11:42

our assets.

1:11:50

The HARB is required to follow um

1:11:54

to review the following kinds of

1:11:56

projects, alterations that are visible

1:11:58

from the public right of way within

1:12:00

these districts. Uh we also have purview

1:12:04

over new construction.

1:12:06

Uh s simple things such as awnings,

1:12:08

fences, and signs. We also have purview

1:12:11

over demolition of part or all of a

1:12:14

building

1:12:16

and it's whether it's a commercial,

1:12:19

residential or public property.

1:12:23

The application review um is part of the

1:12:27

building permit process. So applicants

1:12:31

will submit uh drawings, photographs,

1:12:34

description of the work. Um, and those

1:12:37

applications are due the first of each

1:12:39

month, first Friday of each month, and

1:12:41

then the board meets, like I said,

1:12:43

monthly. That would be the first Monday

1:12:45

of every month, and the applicant

1:12:47

representative must attend.

1:12:51

Um, city staff may uh often

1:12:54

administratively approve applications

1:12:56

involving inind repair and that is

1:12:59

something that is granted through uh

1:13:02

discussion with the board.

1:13:05

Then those recommendations, like I said,

1:13:06

go to the city council.

1:13:10

Um, some similar CA or common cases that

1:13:14

we look at are

1:13:16

more than not are windows and doors,

1:13:18

awnings, weather control device,

1:13:21

vestibials, um, fences, signage,

1:13:24

additions, and renovations.

1:13:27

And how do we go about determining his

1:13:30

what's

1:13:32

warranted in a historic district? uh we

1:13:34

use the secretary of interior standards

1:13:37

as the guideline as to what is

1:13:41

appropriate or inappropriate again to

1:13:43

preserve the assets and the value of

1:13:45

these historic properties.

1:13:48

Um Harb has also in in my tenure has uh

1:13:54

renewed the guidelines. There's a design

1:13:56

guidelines book booklet which I have

1:14:00

here and which can be found on the

1:14:03

links through um the website which helps

1:14:07

to guide the residents

1:14:10

as to what's appropriate and what's uh

1:14:13

inappropriate and and also why is it

1:14:16

important to do it in a certain way.

1:14:24

Um typical

1:14:27

considerations are also regarding

1:14:30

material, the style and the streetscape.

1:14:32

And regarding materials, whether you're

1:14:35

replacing wood with some composite

1:14:37

material or with wood, um we're right

1:14:40

now um

1:14:43

Erica is new to the staff and she's been

1:14:45

working on an an addendum to the

1:14:50

guidelines which will further elaborate

1:14:52

on what those types of materials can be

1:14:56

because think we have to keep up with

1:14:58

the changing technologies of materials

1:15:01

and be able So then further in inform

1:15:04

the public with our guidelines um what

1:15:07

those materials can be.

1:15:10

So we see our purpose as safeguarding

1:15:12

the community structures, features and

1:15:14

streetscapes that make Harrisburg unique

1:15:18

um by saving the distinct character of

1:15:20

the city uh that will benefit the

1:15:22

community in many ways. uh it's cultural

1:15:26

benefits, there are social benefits,

1:15:28

there are even economic benefits that go

1:15:31

tie along with redevelopment.

1:15:33

Um and I think also I keep calling them

1:15:37

assets because once we

1:15:40

lose our historic connection um then it

1:15:43

becomes everywhere USA and we want our

1:15:46

own identity.

1:15:48

There's also environmental benefits to

1:15:50

historic preservation because those

1:15:53

those materials are already there. We

1:15:55

don't have to find new materials and put

1:16:00

more energy into construction.

1:16:06

So, um

1:16:08

again, uh that's pretty much the gist of

1:16:11

what HARB does. And um I had thought

1:16:15

wanted to give some thoughts on maybe

1:16:17

some improvements or modifications as

1:16:19

you go forward with the the harp.

1:16:23

Um, of course,

1:16:26

we want to fill the vacancies because

1:16:28

the more people we have at the table,

1:16:30

the better representation we have.

1:16:33

Again, we have six municipal districts

1:16:36

and we have seven members, three of

1:16:38

which are professionals. So, the more we

1:16:40

can represent each of those historic

1:16:42

districts, I think that's the better.

1:16:46

Um, also staffing. We've benefited from

1:16:49

a new staff member, a historic

1:16:52

preservation preservationist

1:16:54

um specialist, and she is able to

1:17:00

increase our abilities as a board and um

1:17:03

I would encourage continuing to to build

1:17:06

the staff uh because they can assist the

1:17:09

applicants as they go through the

1:17:10

process

1:17:12

and um monitor the projects within the

1:17:14

city that may not be coming to the

1:17:17

across their table. Um there

1:17:20

unfortunately there's lots of things

1:17:22

that happen

1:17:24

in the weekend hours and don't come

1:17:27

through hard. So we lose some of our

1:17:29

integrity in these districts.

1:17:33

Um, also there's been discussion in the

1:17:36

past and I think it's a it's an

1:17:38

incentive in the future to put an

1:17:40

inventory together of different

1:17:43

properties within in the these districts

1:17:46

and u document those assets.

1:17:50

Also, I think it's important to have

1:17:52

staff and HARB continue to educate the

1:17:55

community about the as the benefits of

1:17:58

historic preservation

1:18:00

using the members as resources

1:18:04

and also consideration of expanding the

1:18:07

historic districts to

1:18:10

capture more of the unique

1:18:15

uh unique qualities of Harrisburg and

1:18:17

some of those historic properties that

1:18:18

are not within in confines of the

1:18:20

districts.

1:18:25

Um just also some logistics I think um

1:18:30

and this is something we can bring up at

1:18:32

our our board board member board

1:18:34

meetings which we have um but I see

1:18:37

these nice uh screens up here. We do

1:18:40

hold our our meetings in these chambers

1:18:43

but we aren't use we're using a lot of

1:18:45

paper. We are historic architectural

1:18:47

review board, but we could use

1:18:49

technologies that are current um and not

1:18:52

require so much paper.

1:18:55

Yeah. Not not so much paper when the

1:18:57

applications are turned in. They could

1:19:00

be electronic and distributed

1:19:02

electronically to the board members. I

1:19:05

think that would be more efficient. And

1:19:07

also, I'd like to be able to show as we

1:19:10

discuss put everyone on the same page

1:19:13

literally. So, I think that would be a

1:19:16

benefit.

1:19:17

Um, and as I said, I think other other

1:19:21

things, uh, you asked about engaging the

1:19:23

public, like how do you how do you do

1:19:25

that? Um, I believe in our bylaws, it

1:19:28

talks about annual annual reporting to

1:19:32

council, and this is one of the first

1:19:35

moments we've had to actually have a

1:19:37

conversation about what HARB does. And I

1:19:40

see as an important conduit to share our

1:19:43

experiences and opportunities. And I

1:19:46

also see that it's important to connect

1:19:50

with these other boards as well. We

1:19:53

overlap with a lot of what the

1:19:54

redevelopment authorities trying to

1:19:56

achieve, what the planning commission,

1:19:58

the zoning boards are trying to achieve,

1:20:01

and even the environmental committee.

1:20:04

Um, forgot their name. um environmental

1:20:07

advisory council.

1:20:10

Um

1:20:15

and um so I think we would like to

1:20:18

continue those discussions and also

1:20:20

educate the public about the benefits,

1:20:23

the how-tos and what resources are

1:20:25

available to the public.

1:20:27

Um

1:20:29

and then lastly also beyond the walls of

1:20:32

the district and beyond the walls of

1:20:34

this the the borders of the city itself.

1:20:37

How can we entice people to come to

1:20:41

historic Harrisburg, the old city? So

1:20:45

you go to many many towns out and about

1:20:48

and you go to the core and along main

1:20:52

thorough affairs you see signs to say

1:20:54

old city Harrisburg or actually I just

1:20:58

went to Lan Lancaster and it does have

1:21:00

those directional signs and we want to

1:21:02

be proud of that history and draw

1:21:05

attention to it. So I guess that's what

1:21:08

I have if you have any questions.

1:21:12

>> Thank you so much. Thank you for your

1:21:13

recommendations. I appreciate those. Um,

1:21:16

how do you feel about QR codes? Do you

1:21:19

think that would be helpful?

1:21:22

>> I'm sure they can be. I'm not sure in

1:21:24

what way we would be using them.

1:21:26

>> Okay.

1:21:26

>> Um, but it's

1:21:28

>> it's to reference the meeting materials.

1:21:30

You mentioned a lot of paper in your

1:21:32

meeting packets. um if individuals

1:21:36

attending the meeting or if other board

1:21:38

members just scan hovers their phone

1:21:41

over the QR code, all of the

1:21:43

documentation for the meeting would pop

1:21:44

up.

1:21:45

>> That would be le catapulting us into

1:21:47

this technology.

1:21:50

>> You can take baby steps with it. You

1:21:51

could have you could still have some

1:21:54

hard copy packets, but

1:21:56

>> Right. And can you please remind me, was

1:21:58

it in 2021 that the HARB guidelines were

1:22:02

updated?

1:22:04

>> Uh, well, we had some public meetings in

1:22:07

2019.

1:22:09

>> Um, and when it was actually voted on, I

1:22:13

think was not too

1:22:14

>> far thereafter. I don't remember if it

1:22:17

was 2020.

1:22:18

>> I was trying to remember. I remember the

1:22:20

public meetings and I remember all of

1:22:22

the discussion around it. I thought um

1:22:25

that they were really helpful to

1:22:27

residents um particularly those that

1:22:30

were new to historic districts and they

1:22:33

didn't know um all of the necessities

1:22:36

there. I did want to clarify um so

1:22:42

our packet here notes that the harb

1:22:47

members are appointed by the mayor with

1:22:50

council consent. Um but on the website

1:22:54

it notes that the body is comprised of

1:22:57

seven mayors appointed members excuse me

1:22:59

appointed by city council. So, is that

1:23:07

I thought they were all mayoral

1:23:09

appointments, but I just wanted to

1:23:11

clarify since it reads differently

1:23:14

>> legal.

1:23:17

>> They're reading.

1:23:18

>> My experience, I was asked to join by

1:23:22

the mayor and then I came to council,

1:23:25

>> right, for approval. Yes,

1:23:26

>> that is what I went through.

1:23:29

>> That's what I thought. I just want to

1:23:30

make sure just so everybody

1:23:32

>> is a mayoral appointment.

1:23:33

>> Thank you. And there are currently at

1:23:37

least two vacancies.

1:23:38

>> Yes.

1:23:39

>> Okay.

1:23:40

>> And there is one coming down to council

1:23:42

for the next meeting for the

1:23:43

>> Oh, okay.

1:23:44

>> So that Jeffrey had recommended to the

1:23:45

mayor.

1:23:46

>> Great. So you'll have a new person soon.

1:23:49

Um let's see here. The terms are three

1:23:53

years and they are staggered.

1:23:55

Um,

1:23:57

and a number I guess of the current

1:23:59

board members

1:24:01

terms have expired. Does the mayor

1:24:03

intend to

1:24:06

>> So I'm not sure what the mayor's

1:24:08

intention is. Historically, not for all

1:24:10

boards, but for most boards, there's a

1:24:12

provision both in state law and local

1:24:14

that they continue to serve until until

1:24:18

>> uh they can leave, but the but but they

1:24:20

can stay. And so I don't know what the

1:24:21

mayor's term is. I think part of the

1:24:23

reason you're having this meeting is

1:24:25

sometimes it's very hard to get

1:24:26

volunteers

1:24:28

uh for new position, new people. So

1:24:30

rotating is hard on on the rules are

1:24:33

very ambitious for rotation and and the

1:24:36

volunteer list isn't long enough to do

1:24:37

it for almost any board. That's that's

1:24:39

the reality.

1:24:41

>> So

1:24:42

>> they also have to know about it. So I

1:24:44

think that was more so the reason why.

1:24:46

Right.

1:24:46

>> Yes. Yes, some of these boards.

1:24:47

>> I'm going to say this is probably my

1:24:49

seventh public meeting on boards and

1:24:51

commissions and why people should

1:24:52

volunteer.

1:24:53

>> So, it comes up again and again. The

1:24:55

council keeps trying. They keep trying

1:24:57

and

1:24:58

>> that's all we can do, right?

1:24:59

>> And so, you try to get people to

1:25:00

volunteer and be interested and uh and

1:25:03

we've been very fortunate with some very

1:25:05

good people on very many boards.

1:25:08

>> We have. So, I just wanted to review the

1:25:10

formal reports and advice provided. I

1:25:13

think you covered this, but I just

1:25:15

wanted to note recommendations on

1:25:16

certificates of appropriateness should

1:25:19

be submitted in writing to city council

1:25:21

recommending approval or denial of

1:25:23

applications.

1:25:25

An annual report submitted to the mayor

1:25:28

and city council summarizing

1:25:29

transactions, activities, and

1:25:31

preservation oversight. Guidance on

1:25:34

historic district boundaries. You may

1:25:36

advise city council and staff on the

1:25:39

limits of historic districts and

1:25:41

boundary adjustments, which you

1:25:43

mentioned expanding those. And then

1:25:45

demolition criteria and preservation

1:25:48

standards provide policy guidance and

1:25:51

recommendations on demolition requests

1:25:53

and preservation best practices.

1:25:57

I'm going to open the floor to my

1:25:58

colleagues who may have some questions

1:26:00

for you. I will start with our building

1:26:02

and housing committee chair,

1:26:04

Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

1:26:06

questions?

1:26:07

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

1:26:10

>> Evening.

1:26:11

>> Um Trina, Miss Trina.

1:26:13

>> Yes.

1:26:14

>> Um thank you for being here this

1:26:16

evening. I pretty much look at all of

1:26:19

the um cases that come through and I

1:26:24

actually go out in the to the community

1:26:27

and drive around and look at some of the

1:26:29

properties.

1:26:31

I don't if I have a dispute or I don't

1:26:35

agree with something, I will send you an

1:26:38

email or the secretary

1:26:41

um of the board. I don't know who that

1:26:44

is. I just look at the emails and then

1:26:46

respond.

1:26:48

>> Um but for the most part, I think the

1:26:51

board is very strict when it comes to

1:26:55

our um historic properties.

1:26:58

>> Um and for a good reason. Um, as you

1:27:00

said, we want to maintain the integrity

1:27:04

um, and also be an attraction, keep that

1:27:06

attraction in our city. Um,

1:27:11

one question.

1:27:13

When someone buys a a historic property,

1:27:17

does the board notify them about the uh

1:27:22

decisions uh or

1:27:25

notify them that they have to check with

1:27:27

the board before they make any revisions

1:27:30

to their property.

1:27:33

>> Right. So um the building application

1:27:36

goes uh to the city for review. So

1:27:39

that's for building permit and then that

1:27:41

would catch if it's in a historic

1:27:42

district and what the work is. So it's

1:27:44

if it's on the exterior facades, it's in

1:27:47

the purview of HARB. Um but when people

1:27:51

buy properties within the historic

1:27:53

districts, uh the real estate agents are

1:27:57

required to provide uh provide that

1:27:59

information that they are within a

1:28:01

historic district and there are certain

1:28:03

criteria.

1:28:05

>> I wondered about that and thank you for

1:28:07

clarifying um that the real estate

1:28:09

agents actually that's their job to do

1:28:11

that. Um okay, so for right now I don't

1:28:15

have any other questions. Thank you.

1:28:19

Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

1:28:21

questions?

1:28:22

>> Thank you, President Hill. I don't have

1:28:23

any questions for you, but thank you

1:28:25

very much for your service.

1:28:28

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

1:28:30

questions?

1:28:42

>> Okay, Councilman Rodriguez, any

1:28:45

questions?

1:28:47

Um, no, no questions for me and thank

1:28:49

you for joining us this evening.

1:28:51

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

1:28:53

questions?

1:28:54

>> Uh, yeah, I think it was pretty much

1:28:56

answered. Um, Councilwoman Davis uh is

1:29:00

asked about um how are we notifying um

1:29:02

the the the buyers of this of these

1:29:05

properties? Um because I've been through

1:29:07

a couple of them and some and this is

1:29:09

for the public because some of them are

1:29:10

young people that are looking to to buy

1:29:13

and and and and rehab a lot of these

1:29:15

homes. Um there was one in particular

1:29:17

incident where one has uh bought the

1:29:20

property in a historical area and

1:29:23

started he seen someone else do

1:29:25

something different than the historical

1:29:27

area pretty much allowed and then they

1:29:30

wanted to follow and start getting the

1:29:32

same material. Then they had to take all

1:29:34

of this stuff down uh before they could

1:29:37

even sell resell the home. So they took

1:29:39

a big loss. So, I'm really concerned

1:29:41

about making sure that this information

1:29:43

when it comes to I think that was a

1:29:45

great question. When someone purchases

1:29:47

the house, we should be able to send

1:29:48

something out from the city to let them

1:29:51

know you've just purchased a home in a

1:29:53

historical uh area and here's here's the

1:29:56

guidelines because um and I think they

1:29:58

probably would have done it the way

1:30:00

following the rules if they would have

1:30:01

known about it and it's maybe just

1:30:03

because they're young at it too. So

1:30:06

hopefully trying to just brick that gap

1:30:08

and making sure that we can get some of

1:30:09

that information out to any potential

1:30:12

buyers and anyone that actually

1:30:13

purchases. So um that's something that

1:30:16

um I think you answered, but if not, I

1:30:18

hopefully we can really work towards

1:30:20

something like that. And that's all I

1:30:21

have.

1:30:22

>> Sure. I would I would agree. The more

1:30:24

ways to capture and and inform um

1:30:27

potential buyers and people who are

1:30:30

buying properties, I think the better.

1:30:32

Um, but I believe the onus is on the

1:30:34

real estate agent at the moment, but to

1:30:37

capture it.

1:30:37

>> Well, some of them it could be the city

1:30:39

owns may some may have some of the the

1:30:41

parcels, right? And and and again, I

1:30:43

think so that would be on us to to send

1:30:45

that out or No,

1:30:46

>> there aren't too many properties that we

1:30:48

own that have a building on it.

1:30:50

>> Okay.

1:30:50

>> Right. That that's the reality. So, we

1:30:53

don't we those would be great because

1:30:54

it'd actually auction off for money.

1:30:59

>> All right. Thank you.

1:31:00

>> Thank you.

1:31:01

>> Thank you. I'm going to try one more

1:31:03

time. Councilwoman Ross, any questions?

1:31:07

Okay. Thank you. Thanks for being here

1:31:09

and for your recommendations.

1:31:13

>> Next, we have the parking authority.

1:31:38

Uh, good evening, council members. Uh,

1:31:40

and I'm going to echo one of the earlier

1:31:42

comments, and that is, uh, I'm here

1:31:45

having served as the chairman of the

1:31:47

parking authority since, uh, 2014, but

1:31:50

I've also served on the planning

1:31:52

commission, uh, as vice chair since, I

1:31:54

think it was 97. And this is the first

1:31:57

time that we've been asked to come in

1:31:59

front of council on an official basis as

1:32:01

planning commission. So I'm not going to

1:32:03

be covering that tonight. We have some

1:32:04

really good folks here from our group.

1:32:06

But uh just want to thank you. I mean

1:32:08

that's a it's a very welcome turn of

1:32:10

events. So with all that said uh Ver

1:32:14

McKisik

1:32:15

317 North Front Street as I mentioned

1:32:18

currently serve as the uh as the

1:32:21

chairman of the Harrisburg Parking

1:32:22

Authority. So what is it other than

1:32:24

boring u

1:32:26

uh Harrisburg parking authority was

1:32:28

created by the city uh in 1972 pursuant

1:32:32

to the parking authority laws of 1947.

1:32:35

Uh since the incorporation of the

1:32:38

authority has had a separate existence

1:32:40

with purposes and powers set forth in

1:32:42

the articles incorporation the act and

1:32:44

ordinance. Uh the current term or the

1:32:46

enabling legislation that created it uh

1:32:50

runs out in 2037.

1:32:52

So, um, presently, Harrisburg Parking

1:32:55

Authority operates, uh, a a reduced

1:32:58

quantity of parking related elements,

1:33:00

per se. Uh, the city-owned surface lots

1:33:03

on City Island. Uh, also the parking

1:33:07

garage on City Island. They were not

1:33:09

incorporated into the Harrisburg Strong

1:33:12

deal that I'll talk about in a moment.

1:33:15

Uh, we also operate a small service lot

1:33:17

between Malberry and Deubberry Streets

1:33:18

by the train station. Uh we likewise

1:33:21

managed a parking garage attached to the

1:33:24

uh Pennsylvania National Insurance

1:33:26

Company building. Uh in as I mentioned

1:33:29

in 2013, there was a thing called the

1:33:31

Harrisburg Strong Plan. Uh that was the

1:33:33

recovery uh from the the uh bankruptcy

1:33:37

situation. At that point, Harrisburg

1:33:39

Park authority transferred the remainder

1:33:41

of the parking system uh to Pennsylvania

1:33:44

Economic Development Finance Agency

1:33:46

called PTFA. Uh the garages and surface

1:33:49

lots were transferred by a lease under a

1:33:52

asset transfer agreement between the

1:33:53

city Harrisburg parking authority and

1:33:56

peta. Right now HPA is the Harrisburg

1:34:00

parking author authority is a leaseor

1:34:02

with the leasur's rights and duties

1:34:04

under the leases. Uh Harrisburg parking

1:34:07

authority is the transfer transfer. I

1:34:10

kind of love the lawyer worms. Uh

1:34:12

responsible for monitoring pedest

1:34:14

performance of its obligations under the

1:34:16

asset transfer agreement. Uh and the way

1:34:19

that works, revenue from the transferred

1:34:21

parking system flows through a revenue

1:34:23

what we call a waterfall by means

1:34:26

of which revenue is allocated to a

1:34:28

sequestered sequential tiered manner. uh

1:34:32

in recent years the level unfortunately

1:34:33

the waterfall which is supposed to

1:34:36

distur dist distribute the rents to HBA

1:34:38

and the payments to the city has

1:34:40

remained unfunded because of decreases

1:34:42

in uh income. Uh unfortunately unfunded

1:34:46

rent and city payments lapse at the end

1:34:48

of each year and do not acrew. So when

1:34:50

the year goes it's never coming back. Um

1:34:54

the current membership status uh uh the

1:34:58

uh we have five seats, four are filled.

1:35:01

All terms have expired. Uh the members

1:35:04

of the Harrisburg Parking Authority

1:35:06

Board continue to serve as was

1:35:08

referenced until appointed qualified.

1:35:12

The public engagement we meet once a

1:35:14

month uh if a quorum is available. Our

1:35:17

meetings are public subject to of course

1:35:18

the sunshine law. Uh in terms of

1:35:22

reporting structure, we are an

1:35:23

independent authority. Uh the mayor

1:35:26

appoints and can remove Harrisburg

1:35:27

parking authority board members. Uh we

1:35:30

do have an executive director employed

1:35:32

by the city who handles management of

1:35:34

tasks for us including the garages and

1:35:36

things that are on the island.

1:35:38

uh question relative to appointment and

1:35:41

and qualifications

1:35:43

uh really comes down to being familiar

1:35:45

with the city and also having an

1:35:47

understanding of parking and the parking

1:35:49

business and towards that end actually

1:35:52

most of the members uh not all anymore

1:35:54

but for a long time were members of the

1:35:56

part of the planning commission which

1:35:58

brought that information along along

1:36:00

with us. The uh one thing about the uh

1:36:03

parking the parking authority if I could

1:36:05

find the page I'm looking for here.

1:36:09

There it is. Just a quick summation

1:36:11

before I'm going to call before 19 or

1:36:13

2013 which was before the bankruptcy and

1:36:16

post plan I'll call it. Uh before 2013

1:36:20

the parking authority owned and operated

1:36:23

parking lots uh and meters. Now we're

1:36:27

just a title home lesser and u we have

1:36:30

the concessant agreement with PET. Uh

1:36:33

before we had a revenue pledge. It we

1:36:35

were quite a a financial engine for the

1:36:38

city back in the day. Uh today we're

1:36:40

just oversight and compliance. So we're

1:36:43

monitoring concessionire and hopefully

1:36:45

ensuring the agreements and executed in

1:36:47

compliance. Uh in the past we had direct

1:36:51

financing. The garages were done under

1:36:53

separate debt and um

1:36:56

Today we're conduits for financing. We

1:36:59

still have the ability to borrow money

1:37:02

uh in Pennsylvania under law, but we

1:37:04

haven't done that since the recovery

1:37:07

deal. Uh but we can issue debt in in

1:37:09

conjunction with PETO. And finally, of

1:37:12

course, it used to be that we integrated

1:37:14

with the city anything that had to do

1:37:15

with parking. Uh today, we're just

1:37:17

interfacing relative to issues regarding

1:37:20

city parking decisions, enforcements. Uh

1:37:23

to that end, we do end up intercepting a

1:37:25

number of comments that come in from uh

1:37:28

community groups who've done studies or

1:37:30

have had issues relative to parking uh

1:37:32

which feeds over to the parking

1:37:34

authority or the planning commission on

1:37:37

a regular basis, capital neighbors,

1:37:40

other folks within the recovery or the

1:37:42

no compete zone under the issue. So, so

1:37:46

that like I say is very boring, but

1:37:48

that's what we do.

1:37:50

So, I'll take any questions. It's not

1:37:52

boring. It's good information for people

1:37:54

to know. As you know, parking is a

1:37:57

premium everywhere in the city and it's

1:37:59

a discussion that we have quite often.

1:38:02

Um, I did want to note, you mentioned

1:38:05

that all of the five members are

1:38:07

appointed by the mayor and the term

1:38:09

length is five years. They are staggered

1:38:12

terms. I just wanted to review the

1:38:15

formal reports and advice provided as

1:38:17

I've been doing. An annual financial and

1:38:20

activities report should be submitted as

1:38:23

required by the urban redevelopment law

1:38:26

typically to the city of Harrisburg and

1:38:29

filed with the Commonwealth of

1:38:30

Pennsylvania. Project proposals and

1:38:33

plans should be reviewed in coordination

1:38:36

with city council and the mayor when

1:38:39

redevelopment activities involve public

1:38:42

approvals or funding. And then public

1:38:46

notices and hearings provided as

1:38:49

required under state law for

1:38:51

redevelopment project approval and

1:38:53

property. Oh, sorry. I'm reading the

1:38:56

redevelopment authorities. Sorry. I'm

1:38:58

like

1:38:59

here. This is really

1:39:00

>> Hold on. Sorry, I was on the wrong page.

1:39:03

I flipped the other way. Annual

1:39:06

financial statements and audits should

1:39:08

be filed in compliance with the pens

1:39:10

with the parking authority law and

1:39:12

provided to the commonwealth and the

1:39:14

city. Policy and operational reports

1:39:18

should be re reviewed by the board of

1:39:20

directors and shared with the city when

1:39:23

policies or partnerships impact

1:39:25

municipal operations. And finally,

1:39:27

public information, notices, rate

1:39:30

structures, and facility updates are

1:39:32

made available to the public as part of

1:39:34

the authorities's transparency

1:39:36

obligations. I just have one question.

1:39:40

Where are your meetings held?

1:39:42

>> Uh, we have our own offices that are

1:39:44

located in a public safety building.

1:39:46

>> Okay. Thank you for clarifying. I don't

1:39:48

have any other questions. I will open

1:39:50

the floor to my colleagues who may have

1:39:51

additional questions. I'm going to start

1:39:53

with Councilman Jones.

1:39:56

Thank you, President Hill. Yes.

1:39:59

>> Woo. Parking, parking, parking.

1:40:02

First, again, I'll say start out saying

1:40:04

thank you for your service and

1:40:06

everything that you're doing. Um, you

1:40:08

know, it's very I just have two areas um

1:40:12

that I want to look at in your general

1:40:14

function when it comes to uh regulation

1:40:17

and enforcement. Can you expound on that

1:40:20

role? Uh because

1:40:23

>> Sure. Sure. You know, when I first when

1:40:24

I first got here, uh, one of the first

1:40:27

things I jumped on was, uh, ordinances

1:40:29

here, parking on the curbs. So, I just

1:40:32

want to see what role you guys play. We

1:40:34

we actually have little role in that

1:40:36

because that was contained of both

1:40:37

meters enforcement which is which is

1:40:40

parking tickets and uh the finance from

1:40:43

the garages operation the garages within

1:40:45

the no compete area which is most of the

1:40:47

downtown was transferred to pedi

1:40:49

standard parking and I think their esbos

1:40:51

plea they've just gone through a name

1:40:53

change.

1:40:54

>> Um so we really have very little control

1:40:56

over that. uh if it's City Island, the

1:40:59

garage there or outside of the no

1:41:01

compete zone, uh we have the ability uh

1:41:05

to have a little bit more to to do and

1:41:07

say and work work with.

1:41:09

>> So nothing like in the in the areas of

1:41:11

uh like Allison Hill, South Harrisburg.

1:41:13

>> Well, we could do there that that is not

1:41:15

part of the uh of the no compete. What

1:41:17

and I I keep mentioning no compete. What

1:41:19

I should mention there was there's a map

1:41:21

that was created which contains most of

1:41:23

downtown Harrisburg and up just past the

1:41:25

Broad Street Market. And within that

1:41:28

area, one of the things that the the

1:41:30

agreement, which is 40-year agreement,

1:41:32

>> yeah,

1:41:33

>> I'm aware it was a part of the strong.

1:41:35

>> And one of the things I don't think a

1:41:36

lot of people understand is that that

1:41:38

40-year deal, we were 10 years or 12

1:41:40

years into it because the financing or

1:41:42

the the funds were not coming in. It was

1:41:45

refinanced two years ago to prevent it

1:41:46

from going into default and added

1:41:48

another 10 years. So, we're still

1:41:51

sitting at 40 years in this deal, 203.

1:41:55

Um so so that's really one of the

1:41:58

struggles the u uh no compete the

1:42:01

biggest thing and I'm going to

1:42:02

>> before you move on who who made that

1:42:04

decision

1:42:05

>> that was negotiated between all the bond

1:42:07

holders the city attorneys other

1:42:09

entities from the state pedce

1:42:13

um and and we would welcome and we would

1:42:16

like to make the offer to have our

1:42:19

council come and Tim Anderson and step

1:42:22

you through it because it's a

1:42:23

fascinating

1:42:24

read to see where we are because it has

1:42:28

such a big in my opinion impact on the

1:42:31

future of this recovery of downtown

1:42:32

Harrisburg.

1:42:33

>> Absolutely it does and and and I think

1:42:35

we're all there and and we're looking at

1:42:37

this. So yeah, I'll probably I'll ask

1:42:40

legal this question, but the question I

1:42:42

was going to ask is can we get out of

1:42:44

this gone play? So, uh I know it's we'll

1:42:48

take a financial hit if we if we if we

1:42:50

attempted to do this, but um it is one

1:42:53

of the biggest uh pet peeves right now,

1:42:55

especially when we're looking in and and

1:42:57

bringing downtown back in any capacity.

1:42:59

Uh go ahead, Mr. L. I'll see you.

1:43:02

>> Not sure. Is that is that a question?

1:43:04

Can we break

1:43:05

>> Can we break a contract?

1:43:07

>> I was going to ask it off, but if you

1:43:08

want to answer, sure.

1:43:09

>> I mean, any contract can be broken. I'm

1:43:12

not sure that that's a a good idea,

1:43:14

right? Obviously, we would need to

1:43:15

review the contract and speak with

1:43:18

everyone to figure out what that could

1:43:20

mean,

1:43:21

>> right? But it's generally not a good

1:43:23

idea to try and go breaking contracts.

1:43:25

That's why you take your time and make

1:43:26

them in the first place, right?

1:43:28

>> Is there is there And I haven't looked

1:43:31

deeply into this policy, but I'm just

1:43:34

knowing

1:43:35

and I don't want to call them out, but

1:43:37

you know this some of these things have

1:43:39

ruined other areas, other cities uh with

1:43:42

the parking. Um so and it is a concern

1:43:45

again if we're looking to um change

1:43:49

directions in what we're doing far as uh

1:43:51

bringing people back into the city.

1:43:53

People want to en enjoy our our

1:43:55

festivities, our historical areas, you

1:43:58

know, and and these things are in place.

1:44:00

So is there any room for renegotiation?

1:44:05

>> Again, you're really not renegotiating.

1:44:07

If there's a contract in place, you're

1:44:09

breaching the contract. So like

1:44:13

it's not really a question. Can you

1:44:14

breach a contract? Yes, there are

1:44:16

consequences when you do. Can you

1:44:17

renegotiate? Yes. If the other side

1:44:19

agrees, there's clause that says

1:44:22

>> it, you know, you can make amendments,

1:44:24

but both sides need to be done in

1:44:26

writing.

1:44:28

So it's a contract. It can be amended,

1:44:31

but there are consequences when you

1:44:32

amend contracts.

1:44:34

>> Okay. Yeah. I mean, the I pretty much

1:44:37

figured that you could, but I I know it

1:44:39

probably wouldn't even be feasible to

1:44:40

do, but it's just something that is is

1:44:43

it's a big problem and I I think we all

1:44:45

are there on that. It's a big problem in

1:44:47

our city. Um along with um some of the

1:44:50

other parking issues. Uh but one of the

1:44:53

things I see too is their purpose of um

1:44:56

to reduce traffic congestions.

1:44:59

>> We we don't have that problem right now.

1:45:03

>> Support local business. ago, we had that

1:45:05

problem. And the the deal was was really

1:45:07

put together uh under the vision of the

1:45:10

downtown as basically a giant office

1:45:12

park

1:45:13

>> with 20 to 30,000 people traveling into

1:45:15

the city every day. That's changed and

1:45:18

we've been waiting for it to perhaps

1:45:19

come back for the last four or five

1:45:21

years. There's been a little bit, but

1:45:23

it's still running deficits and it's not

1:45:25

really covering many of the tiers of

1:45:27

financing because there's a whole series

1:45:28

of levels of bonds that have been

1:45:31

placed. So ultimately something will

1:45:33

have to be restructured how that looks.

1:45:35

Um the biggest thing that from a

1:45:38

planning basis is however we have to pay

1:45:40

them back somehow. Uh but the biggest

1:45:42

thing from a planning basis is that

1:45:44

right now for the no compete area you

1:45:47

know city sponsored property parking is

1:45:50

not is effectively off the table

1:45:52

completely. That be the garages building

1:45:54

new garages. um private parking it's

1:45:57

possible but if you look around the

1:46:00

downtown you see it's a very strong

1:46:02

upward look because the final author

1:46:04

authority of that is Peda and the

1:46:06

operator not the planning commission so

1:46:09

where in the past you had Pennsylvania

1:46:11

National Insurance building a parking

1:46:12

garage and putting headquarters downtown

1:46:15

you're not seeing it now

1:46:16

>> this day yeah

1:46:17

>> you know I'm working with a developer

1:46:18

right now who's looking to put do

1:46:20

quarter million square foot building

1:46:21

bring it back to life um but he's

1:46:24

looking60 62 apartments and we're

1:46:27

looking at the need for to be paying

1:46:29

$320 to $380 a month for reserve parking

1:46:33

space and it's wiping out the

1:46:35

performance.

1:46:36

>> Yeah,

1:46:37

>> that's where it's really at in the basis

1:46:39

of our recovery deal. So, I'm getting

1:46:40

off tangent. That's not what we're here

1:46:41

for, right?

1:46:42

>> I apologize.

1:46:43

>> No problem. Um I I won't hold you any

1:46:45

longer, but those are just some of the I

1:46:47

just wanted to see what role you played

1:46:49

in um in enforcement and uh and some of

1:46:52

the policies that we have, but I see

1:46:54

it's kind of restricted to certain

1:46:55

areas. Yes, sir.

1:46:56

>> And and and that's fine. So, I'll keep

1:46:59

beating up this ladder to try to get

1:47:01

some of this stuff resolved. So, thank

1:47:02

you. I have no further questions and

1:47:04

thank you again for your service.

1:47:06

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

1:47:08

questions?

1:47:10

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh pretty

1:47:12

much just echoing the sentiments of

1:47:14

Councilman Jones and um just to add on

1:47:17

top of it, a lot of our residents issues

1:47:19

with parking is just the space there is

1:47:21

none that's provided. Um a lot of our

1:47:24

sidewalks don't exist. A lot of our

1:47:26

curving that would indicate where to

1:47:28

park still, you know, isn't available in

1:47:30

certain neighborhoods around the city.

1:47:32

But I I understand your jurisdiction

1:47:34

would only, you know, be detailed to

1:47:36

certain parameters. So, um, as

1:47:38

Councilman Jones said, you know, maybe

1:47:40

we could just kind of keep beating that

1:47:42

horse, but I do appreciate you being

1:47:43

here this evening, and I look forward

1:47:45

to, um, a lot of the work you'll be

1:47:47

doing in the future. Thank you.

1:47:49

>> Thank you.

1:47:50

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

1:47:54

>> So, she had to uh sign off. She might be

1:47:56

trying to log back on here.

1:47:58

>> Okay. Thank you, Vice President Green.

1:48:00

>> Thank you very much, President Hill. Uh,

1:48:02

it's good to see you tonight, Mr.

1:48:04

McKisick. Um,

1:48:05

>> I don't have any questions for you. Um,

1:48:08

I'd love to sit down and talk about how

1:48:09

the parking deal was refinanced, uh, and

1:48:11

get to know a little more about that.

1:48:13

Uh, because that is interesting that it

1:48:15

kind of set us back 10 years. Um, but as

1:48:18

far as questions for the parking

1:48:19

authority, I don't have any tonight.

1:48:21

Thank you.

1:48:23

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

1:48:25

questions?

1:48:27

>> Off. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. McKisick,

1:48:30

for being here. I just want to say thank

1:48:32

you for my parking decal. I can park

1:48:35

anywhere around the city and not have to

1:48:37

pay.

1:48:38

>> We We know certain things. Yes.

1:48:39

>> Thank you. And I don't have any

1:48:41

questions.

1:48:43

>> Thank you. Thanks for being here and for

1:48:46

participating.

1:48:47

>> This is great.

1:48:48

>> Sure. Thank you.

1:48:50

>> Next we have the planning commission.

1:49:02

All right. Good evening. Uh my name is

1:49:04

Sean Utul. I'm on the city planning

1:49:06

commission obviously and I uh wish to

1:49:09

echo Mr. McKisik's comments. I've been

1:49:10

on the planning commission for too long

1:49:13

now. Uh and this is the first

1:49:15

opportunity I've had we've had to come

1:49:18

before you like this and I I appreciate

1:49:20

that opportunity. Uh we are the planning

1:49:23

commission is enabled by the uh

1:49:26

Pennsylvania municipal municipal

1:49:28

planning code. Uh like we are merely an

1:49:31

advisory board. Our decisions come to

1:49:34

either the city council for final

1:49:36

approval or to the zoning hearing board.

1:49:39

Uh we review requests for subdivisions

1:49:42

uh land development plans uh relief from

1:49:46

zoning uh requirements such as a

1:49:49

variance or a special exception.

1:49:52

uh within the m last oh seven or eight

1:49:54

years of most relevance we were uh

1:49:57

involved in the we were responsible for

1:49:59

the ad adoption of the u the

1:50:01

comprehensive plan and we continue to be

1:50:04

uh responsible for any amendments there

1:50:06

too uh we meet monthly first uh first

1:50:11

Wednesday of every month uh public

1:50:13

participation there at those meetings

1:50:15

and the public does come out when

1:50:17

there's something going on in their

1:50:18

neighborhood and they and they feel

1:50:20

involved and and want to express their

1:50:22

positions. Uh we're a seven member the

1:50:25

yeah the bylaws provide for seven

1:50:27

members and I'm happy to say we're at

1:50:29

full force right now. We we have all

1:50:32

seven board members are filled. Uh which

1:50:35

is nice because we don't have to you

1:50:36

know cancel meetings because of a lack

1:50:38

of a quorum. U I will say we have

1:50:42

probably only two me two of those

1:50:43

members who who are not on expired

1:50:46

terms. Uh

1:50:48

uh and up until up until about a half

1:50:51

hour ago, we actually had a quorum here.

1:50:52

Um we had Ver McKisik who you just heard

1:50:55

from uh Deon Jordan over there and

1:50:58

Basier Vincent who just left and had he

1:51:00

not left, we'd had a quorum. We had four

1:51:02

uh including myself, we had four of us.

1:51:04

The other three are Joe Asbury and uh uh

1:51:09

James Setter Reed. They're both retired

1:51:11

state employees and an Merrick who's an

1:51:13

engineer. Uh

1:51:20

yeah, as far as what you know what the

1:51:22

requirements are to get on there. I

1:51:24

don't think it's written down anywhere,

1:51:25

but uh just we tend to be the people who

1:51:28

are involved in their communities that

1:51:30

have a vested interest in the city, uh

1:51:33

want to, you know, want to make more of

1:51:36

an impact and ask how I can do that and

1:51:38

they get put put on the the board. Uh I

1:51:42

mean for example you got Debron and uh

1:51:45

and Bassier I mean they're so gung-ho

1:51:47

they come to event like this you know uh

1:51:50

in seven oh god many years ago a young

1:51:53

lady she's not so young anymore barely

1:51:56

out of barely out of college she wanted

1:51:58

to get involved in uh and vice president

1:52:02

Green became a member of the planning

1:52:03

commission uh and so that's basically

1:52:07

the you know the requirements to get on

1:52:09

uh who do we report to uh really nobody.

1:52:14

And I I don't mean that arrogantly. I

1:52:15

mean, like I said, we we we make our

1:52:16

decisions when and they come to you.

1:52:18

There's really really nobody that we

1:52:20

report to. Uh that's really all I have

1:52:25

for you.

1:52:26

>> Okay. Thank you so much for being here.

1:52:29

I'm going to review the formal reports

1:52:31

and advice provided. an annual report

1:52:34

submitted to city council by March 1st

1:52:37

each year as required by the

1:52:39

Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning

1:52:41

Code, recommendations on zoning

1:52:44

amendments and map changes submitted to

1:52:47

city council, and recommendations on

1:52:49

subdivision land development and

1:52:52

variance requests submitted to the

1:52:54

zoning hearing board and city council as

1:52:56

appropriate.

1:52:59

I wanted to note that all of the seven

1:53:02

appointments for the planning commission

1:53:05

are appointed by the mayor with city

1:53:07

council consent. The term length uh four

1:53:11

years and no more than two commissioners

1:53:14

can be replaced or reappointed during a

1:53:18

calendar year.

1:53:20

So I don't I don't have any questions

1:53:21

for you. I'm going to open the floor to

1:53:23

my colleagues. I will begin with Vice

1:53:26

President Green.

1:53:28

Thank you, President Hill. Um, I don't

1:53:30

have any questions for the planning

1:53:32

commission. I had the honor of serving

1:53:34

with you all uh for a few years there.

1:53:36

Um, I said I was going to come back to

1:53:38

some meetings and I've only come back to

1:53:40

one, so I apologize for that. I will be

1:53:43

back at some point. Um, I just want to

1:53:45

say thank you all for your service. Um,

1:53:48

thank you all for taking me in. Uh, Mr.

1:53:50

Oul and Mr. McKisik along with the other

1:53:53

members of the planning commission

1:53:54

really took me under their wing when I

1:53:56

uh first came on because I was like what

1:53:59

am I doing here and what do you do? Um I

1:54:01

had no idea um what the planning

1:54:04

commission did uh how important of a job

1:54:05

you all have uh or even if I fit in. Um

1:54:09

and you all really took the time to

1:54:11

explain things to me. I came in um just

1:54:13

in the midst of the comprehensive plan,

1:54:15

the original draft. Uh and so that was

1:54:18

really mind-blowing. But um you all

1:54:21

taught me a lot about the city, about

1:54:22

the city's history, uh about the the

1:54:24

roles of boards and commissions. I

1:54:26

didn't even know boards and commissions

1:54:27

existed honestly before that point. So I

1:54:30

just want to say thank you all for your

1:54:31

continued support uh even to this day.

1:54:33

You'll still reach out and provide

1:54:35

support to me. So I appreciate that and

1:54:37

know that I'm always here uh if you need

1:54:39

anything. Um and I will start coming to

1:54:41

some meetings every now and then.

1:54:43

>> Now and then.

1:54:44

>> It only took you a couple months. You're

1:54:45

grilling, you know, applicants about

1:54:47

you. I don't see the uh I I I don't see

1:54:50

the the hardship for that application.

1:54:53

God, where'd she learn that?

1:54:55

>> You guys,

1:54:57

so thank you. I don't have any other

1:54:58

questions. Thank you.

1:55:00

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. Any

1:55:02

questions?

1:55:03

>> Thank you, Vice President Hill. Thank

1:55:04

you and thank you for being here this

1:55:06

evening. I just appreciate uh you being

1:55:09

here and uh all of the boards being here

1:55:12

this evening to give a brief explanation

1:55:15

of uh what you they do and uh just an

1:55:19

overall view I'm learning and uh each

1:55:23

time you come here a piece of the puzzle

1:55:26

you know gets put in the correct slot.

1:55:29

So, uh, thank you very much again for

1:55:32

being here and for, uh, your willingness

1:55:35

to continue to serve.

1:55:37

>> Thank you for having us.

1:55:39

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

1:55:41

questions?

1:55:42

>> For the first time, I have no questions.

1:55:46

>> Shocker. Thank you, Councilman

1:55:49

Rodriguez. Any questions?

1:55:52

>> Nothing to me. Thank you.

1:55:53

>> Thank you. Has Councilwoman Ross joined

1:55:55

us again?

1:56:00

Okay,

1:56:01

thank you very much for your time.

1:56:03

>> Thank you.

1:56:04

>> God bless you. Next, we have the zoning

1:56:07

hearing board.

1:56:25

I'll speak up this time so I can hear

1:56:27

me. Good evening, madam.

1:56:29

>> Can you please move the microphone

1:56:30

closer to you? Thank you.

1:56:33

>> Is that better?

1:56:34

>> Yes.

1:56:34

>> Okay. Good evening, Madam President.

1:56:36

city council members um zoning hearing

1:56:40

board and everybody else in attendance.

1:56:43

Harris Harrisburg zoning hearing board

1:56:45

is a body composed of three members and

1:56:47

one alternate. Okay. Appointed by city

1:56:51

council.

1:56:52

The board has its own solicitor. Okay.

1:56:56

Um that use it we use as legal counsel

1:56:58

for any the any of u review and decision

1:57:02

criteria we have. Okay. Um, we review

1:57:08

requests for relief from aspects of the

1:57:10

of the city zoning code as well as

1:57:13

appeals on zoning determinations from

1:57:16

the zoning officer.

1:57:19

Meetings are generally held the third

1:57:21

Wednesday of each month in city

1:57:24

council's chambers.

1:57:26

I get the chance to occupy the

1:57:27

president's seat a lot. Okay. Unless

1:57:30

there's a conflict of a holiday, then we

1:57:32

it's the next available Monday

1:57:36

pri prior to the upcoming zoning hearing

1:57:39

board meeting. The agenda will reflect

1:57:41

the cases to be discussed after the

1:57:44

meeting and documentation will be

1:57:46

updated to reflect the actions taken by

1:57:49

the board. Okay.

1:57:52

Agendas for the meetings

1:57:54

um are actually on the city's web page.

1:57:58

Okay. It's normally there a week before

1:58:01

the meeting date. Okay. And it's a

1:58:03

requirement.

1:58:05

Um it's made by the by our by the

1:58:08

planning bureau.

1:58:09

Little note, please note that because

1:58:12

the meeting is a quasi judicial meeting,

1:58:16

minutes are kept by a court stenographer

1:58:20

and not the city and not the city staff.

1:58:23

Okay. Um,

1:58:26

we also were broadcasted. Our all of our

1:58:29

meetings are on channel 20. Okay. So,

1:58:31

it's for public record and they are open

1:58:34

to the public. Anybody can attend.

1:58:38

Um, transcripts can be obtained by

1:58:41

contacting either our either our

1:58:43

solicitor or myself and we'll make that

1:58:46

information get that information to you.

1:58:48

Okay.

1:58:51

Meetings. meetings are held, we said, on

1:58:53

third Monday of of every month. Okay?

1:58:57

And we operate under the Pennsylvania

1:58:59

Municipalities Planning Code or and the

1:59:04

Harrisburg uh city codes. Okay? There

1:59:07

are legal input to our process. Okay?

1:59:10

And we follow specific rules and

1:59:12

procedures. When we go over those steps

1:59:15

one by one, what we actually do, okay?

1:59:18

Our agendas, we we talked about that.

1:59:20

Our agendas are out one week before the

1:59:22

meeting. They're available. They are

1:59:24

online. And the agendas contain every ca

1:59:28

any cases we're going to hear. Okay. Uh

1:59:32

you can go to the city website, click on

1:59:35

it, and you can see the case um and any

1:59:38

related material to the case. One little

1:59:41

note for that. All of our cases are

1:59:44

reviewed by our solicitor before the

1:59:47

meeting. Okay. And the zoning most of

1:59:49

the well our zoning members we tend to

1:59:52

review the cases too sometimes like

1:59:55

going out and actually walking through

1:59:56

the uh the properties that are qu that

1:59:59

are under question. Okay.

2:00:02

Okay. Again we talked about the minutes

2:00:04

for kept by a synographer. Okay.

2:00:07

It's public hearing. All hearings must

2:00:11

be advertised in the in local newspaper

2:00:14

for general circulation for two

2:00:17

consecutive weeks prior to the meeting

2:00:20

day. 15 days. Okay. We've actually had

2:00:23

times where we've had to reschedu cases

2:00:25

because we did not meet that 15-day

2:00:28

limit. Okay. But it's that's again it

2:00:32

has to be put into the local newspapers

2:00:35

and a copy must be given to the

2:00:36

applicants

2:00:38

impartiality. Uh since we're a quasi

2:00:41

legal board,

2:00:43

we have to be fair. We're guided by the

2:00:46

law. Okay. The law

2:00:49

um testimony of the applicants. Okay.

2:00:53

Any documentation which is evidence. We

2:00:57

don't use strict strict rules of civil

2:00:59

of evidence for civil law, but we look

2:01:01

at all that information. Okay.

2:01:06

Um, again, we said again, we're we

2:01:08

function fairly equitably upholding the

2:01:11

goals and objective of the community.

2:01:13

One note here,

2:01:16

it's not whether we like the project or

2:01:18

we don't like the project. We can't be

2:01:21

biased in any form of fashion. If it's a

2:01:23

perceived bias, we will recuse ourselves

2:01:25

from that from from making that

2:01:27

decision. And it has happened since I've

2:01:30

been on the zoning hearing board where

2:01:31

I've had to recuse myself. And what a

2:01:34

recusal normally results in the

2:01:36

familiarity with the applicant or the

2:01:40

property in question. Okay? Or again, or

2:01:44

close proximity to the property in

2:01:46

question. Okay? uh when we say if you

2:01:48

live within a few blocks of the

2:01:50

property, we shouldn't be making any

2:01:52

decisions on that. We need to basically

2:01:53

recuse ourselves. Little rule two, it's

2:01:56

always a majority decision that's going

2:01:58

to be made. And I'm saying that to city

2:02:01

council because right now we have uh

2:02:03

vacancy on the zoning hearing board and

2:02:06

our alternate is vacant. So we have two

2:02:09

people on a tie condition on a decision

2:02:13

decision. the uh decision is

2:02:15

automatically reject is already

2:02:17

defeated. Okay. So if it's a tie vote,

2:02:21

it's not passed.

2:02:24

Okay. On for rejections, for denial.

2:02:27

Okay.

2:02:32

Let's go through. Okay. What's the

2:02:34

reasons for the hearing? Okay. You know,

2:02:36

we we're not there drinking coffee and

2:02:38

just saying hello to everybody. Zon

2:02:40

hearing board reviews applications for

2:02:43

spec for spec specific reasons as

2:02:45

outlined by the municipal code. Okay.

2:02:49

And planning codes applicants normally

2:02:51

are requesting a variance or special

2:02:53

exception to that code. Okay. Which

2:02:57

again at that point in time they'll

2:02:59

produce evidence and we'll make a

2:03:01

decision. Okay. Challenges to that code

2:03:05

have to be valid. Okay. Um and you must

2:03:08

have documentation.

2:03:10

Okay. So uh and when and sometimes

2:03:14

hardship can be used but that hardship

2:03:16

needs to be proven. Okay. To the best of

2:03:19

uh for us to interpret it.

2:03:24

All decisions made by the zoning hearing

2:03:26

board are appealable. Okay. If it's a

2:03:28

denial, you have the right to appeal

2:03:30

that. And that's the reason why we have

2:03:32

a court shenographer. Okay. you appeal

2:03:35

us to the court of common please.

2:03:38

So if you do not agree with our

2:03:40

decision, okay, or we denied you, you

2:03:44

can appeal to the court of common

2:03:45

please. I used to sit down and sometimes

2:03:48

I'm not bragging but we've only in the

2:03:51

last 10 years we only have one case

2:03:56

was actually it was denied to the court

2:03:59

of common please and it went up to the

2:04:00

Commonwealth Court and that's where

2:04:02

basically was overturned.

2:04:04

So, we're we we tend to do our work

2:04:06

well. We use the

2:04:09

the law in our decision criteria, okay?

2:04:13

We're not law enforcement people. We

2:04:15

don't enforce the rules. We use that as

2:04:18

input to our decision criteria and our

2:04:20

discussion. And that's why we have a

2:04:21

solicitor. Okay? We take a lot of our

2:04:24

solicitors before the meeting. They will

2:04:27

write a recap up. Most of our input

2:04:30

comes from the planning uh from the

2:04:32

planning

2:04:33

bureau and from the planning uh

2:04:36

committee. Okay,

2:04:41

let's more again talk about before the

2:04:44

hearings. The applicant must file the

2:04:46

application, pay the fees, provide

2:04:48

required information,

2:04:50

the our solicitor and the municipal

2:04:53

solicitor. Okay, we do actually uh the

2:04:55

city is also represented in our meetings

2:04:57

the law department. Okay, so they're

2:05:00

actually participants and if they have

2:05:02

issues with of of

2:05:05

what's being presented or the

2:05:07

questioning that's being and we can we

2:05:10

can ask questions of the applicant.

2:05:12

Okay, they tend to basically let us know

2:05:15

that well that's not germanine to the

2:05:17

sub to the subject matter. One other

2:05:20

thing too in the hearing

2:05:22

the applicant

2:05:25

can testify his uh anybody who's

2:05:28

supporting him or are not in support of

2:05:31

him can testify. All testimony is sworn

2:05:34

testimony. Okay. Anybody who appears

2:05:37

from his own hearing board is going to

2:05:39

speak. You will have to take an oath

2:05:41

basically that you're presenting factual

2:05:43

information.

2:05:45

Okay. After the meeting um a decision is

2:05:49

our decisions are made. Our decisions

2:05:51

are public record. Okay. We have up to

2:05:54

45 days to get to basically make that

2:05:58

decision available to the applicant.

2:06:00

Okay. And it can be plus minus but it

2:06:03

has to be we have to do that. Um and we

2:06:06

also since it's public record has we

2:06:09

basically retain that information is

2:06:11

filed.

2:06:13

Uh

2:06:16

I I'm hope I think that's about all I

2:06:18

have. Okay. It's it's really we look at

2:06:21

it as a as a I said quasi legal organ uh

2:06:24

bureau and we follow it mostly as you

2:06:28

would go in front of from as you go in

2:06:30

front of a judge.

2:06:32

>> Okay.

2:06:33

Any questions?

2:06:34

>> Thank you very much. Um I don't have any

2:06:37

questions. As a former member of the

2:06:39

zoning hearing board, um I really

2:06:42

enjoyed my time. I served with u Mr. Dan

2:06:45

Dler and Mr. Tom Leonard and they too

2:06:51

ushered me onto the board very um nicely

2:06:55

and got to know them. It was it was a

2:06:57

good time.

2:06:59

>> I just want to I brought you some cases

2:07:01

in front of you.

2:07:02

>> Oh yes, you have. You have. You know,

2:07:04

I've really always

2:07:07

um enjoyed hearing from community

2:07:10

members that were either directly

2:07:13

impacted by a case that we were hearing

2:07:17

um or maybe adjacent something in your

2:07:20

neighborhood. That's how I I initially

2:07:23

met you. Um, so it's always important

2:07:26

for people to pay attention um,

2:07:29

particularly to the work of the zoning

2:07:31

hearing board because a lot of the

2:07:33

development um, around you uh, goes

2:07:36

through this board. So, it's helpful to

2:07:38

know.

2:07:39

>> I'll review the formal reports and

2:07:41

advice provided. I think you covered it,

2:07:43

but I just want to note since I've been

2:07:45

reading them, written decisions and

2:07:47

findings issued to applicants and

2:07:50

recorded as official city

2:07:51

determinations,

2:07:53

variance and acceptance exception

2:07:56

approvals provided to the zoning officer

2:07:58

for incorporation into zoning and

2:08:00

building permits and appealable orders

2:08:03

are decisions decisions may be appealed

2:08:07

to the Dolphin County Court of Common

2:08:08

please under the Pennsylvania

2:08:10

Municipalities Planning Code.

2:08:12

As you mentioned, the board is comprised

2:08:14

of three members. Um, and they are

2:08:17

appointed by city council and the term

2:08:19

length is three years.

2:08:23

>> Yes. Thank you.

2:08:24

>> You're welcome. I don't have any other

2:08:25

questions, so I'll open it up to open

2:08:28

the floor to my colleagues. I'll begin

2:08:30

with Councilwoman Davis. Do you have any

2:08:32

questions?

2:08:33

>> Well, thank you, President Hill, and

2:08:35

thank you, Mr. Fipps, for continuing to

2:08:38

serve our community. It's good to see

2:08:40

you this evening. Thank you.

2:08:43

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

2:08:45

questions?

2:08:46

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening,

2:08:47

Mr. Fipps. It's good to see you as

2:08:48

always. I don't have any questions for

2:08:50

you. I know a little bit about the

2:08:51

zoning hearing board. Um, actually,

2:08:54

before I was on the planning commission,

2:08:56

I was actually originally asked to be

2:08:58

the alternate for the zoning hearing

2:08:59

board. That's about the the second time

2:09:02

I actually got to meet President Bowers

2:09:04

at that time. Um, Miss Bowers at that

2:09:06

time, now President Hill, uh, because

2:09:08

she was being uh coming in

2:09:11

for the work session to to be

2:09:13

interviewed was to be on the zoning

2:09:14

hearing board and that's the first time

2:09:16

we really got to sit down and have a

2:09:17

discussion. Um so I know a little bit

2:09:19

about the zoning hearing board. I thank

2:09:20

you for your continued service in

2:09:22

different capacities and thank you for

2:09:23

being here tonight.

2:09:24

>> Thank you.

2:09:25

>> Thank you. That is the first time we

2:09:29

um Councilman Rodriguez, do you have any

2:09:32

questions?

2:09:33

>> Thank you, Madam President. Uh thank

2:09:35

you, Mr. Fipps, for your testimony this

2:09:37

evening. It's always refreshing to not

2:09:40

only see people filling these vacancies,

2:09:42

but their passion for the boards they're

2:09:43

serving. And thank you, Madam President

2:09:45

and Vice President for sharing your

2:09:46

stories and, you know, just how

2:09:48

successful it can be. You know, the

2:09:50

struggles of filling these roles. So to

2:09:52

hear it on the positive end, getting

2:09:54

people in there, filling the positions,

2:09:56

being passionate, it means the world.

2:09:58

So, thank you all this evening.

2:10:00

>> Thank you. Councilman Jones, any

2:10:02

questions?

2:10:04

>> Um, no. Uh, yes.

2:10:08

Yeah. Yeah. Sorry, I I forgot my mic was

2:10:11

on.

2:10:13

No. Um, what I should have asked the

2:10:16

planning commission and what I'll just

2:10:18

say to you guys, and I think I said this

2:10:20

to you personally, but I just want to

2:10:22

have this on record that, um, how often

2:10:25

are you guys sharing information? One of

2:10:29

the reason why I'm asking that is

2:10:31

because um there was an instance that I

2:10:33

saw where an individual made it all the

2:10:36

way to the zoning hearing board and then

2:10:42

everything unraveled after Go ahead.

2:10:44

>> Yeah, I was going to say because they're

2:10:45

a quasi judicial board. Oh,

2:10:47

>> they can't do that.

2:10:48

>> They It's like a judge. You can't say,

2:10:49

"Hey, let me let me tell you about this

2:10:50

case." Right. So that's

2:10:52

>> Yeah. So let me let me rephrase the

2:10:54

question. Thank you for that because I

2:10:55

don't want to get Mr. Fipps in trouble.

2:10:59

Uh so h how can we just share this

2:11:02

information? You know some of these

2:11:04

committees and boards it may be boring

2:11:06

to some people and unless they're an

2:11:08

applicant um and then they have to like

2:11:10

wait a minute you know so they get

2:11:12

stopped somewhere. So

2:11:15

this is a I guess I don't know how how

2:11:17

can I answer that question.

2:11:18

>> So so I think the distinction is what is

2:11:20

the difference between the roles of

2:11:22

those two boards right the planning

2:11:24

commission very often in the planning

2:11:25

version of the world is Is this a good

2:11:28

idea? This sounds great for Harrisburg.

2:11:30

I like your business idea. The zoning

2:11:32

board, like a judge, is stuck with, did

2:11:34

you meet your burden of proof and your

2:11:36

evidence you put on before us? And so

2:11:38

the the planning board can vote

2:11:39

enthusiastically for a project

2:11:42

>> and and the board members of the zoning

2:11:43

are left with there's there's a

2:11:45

five-part test. You you missed step

2:11:47

three.

2:11:48

>> Yeah.

2:11:48

>> And this test was set up by the

2:11:50

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the

2:11:51

Municipal Planning Code. So it's not

2:11:53

it's not an optional test.

2:11:54

>> So let me do this then. I would

2:11:56

encourage the community.

2:11:58

>> I got an answer for your I got an answer

2:11:59

for your question. Input to my input to

2:12:03

our

2:12:05

to our decision to the documents that we

2:12:08

view is always a report from the

2:12:10

planning commission

2:12:11

>> and that planning is basically

2:12:14

um each of the planning commission

2:12:16

members they question the applicant.

2:12:19

Okay. I get we get to see that but we

2:12:22

see that as part of the package the the

2:12:26

case package that's going to come in

2:12:27

front of

2:12:28

>> Got you. So so there is some information

2:12:30

that's minimal,

2:12:31

>> right? It's not a communication per se

2:12:34

of contacting them. It's a written

2:12:37

document because that's evidence that's

2:12:39

going to be brought in at for the zoning

2:12:41

hearing meeting. Okay. So the same

2:12:44

package you get for a land development

2:12:46

plan when it's a zoning question they

2:12:48

get that same report for from planning

2:12:51

commission for a zoning matter.

2:12:54

>> Gotcha.

2:12:54

>> So that's that that thing you see that

2:12:56

package that comes through that's what

2:12:58

zone that's what zoning gets from

2:12:59

planning.

2:13:00

>> Yeah. So that that'll be again I'll just

2:13:02

say to uh the public um I would

2:13:05

encourage them to pay attention to those

2:13:07

boards and commissions because it's

2:13:09

something that I do because by time

2:13:11

something gets to us you know even

2:13:14

though you guys have a recommendation I

2:13:16

just still want to be able to make a

2:13:17

sound decision on you know moving

2:13:19

forward. So, I would encourage the uh

2:13:21

the public to do as what to to do that

2:13:23

as well. Um because these things are

2:13:25

very important, especially if they're an

2:13:27

applicant looking to get something done

2:13:29

within the city. And the last other

2:13:31

thing I'll only want to recognize, Mr.

2:13:33

Hobbs is here as well from

2:13:35

>> I was going to do that, but thank you.

2:13:37

Mr. Hobbs, who also serves as a member

2:13:41

of the zoning hearing board, is present.

2:13:42

Thank you for

2:13:44

>> Yes, ma'am. Um so, that's all I have and

2:13:46

thank you guys for your service.

2:13:48

Thank you. Thank you very much for your

2:13:51

presence here tonight.

2:13:52

>> Thank you.

2:13:54

>> Our final

2:13:58

No, we have Capitol Region Water. They

2:14:02

aren't outlined on our meeting agenda,

2:14:04

but thank you for coming and we would

2:14:06

appreciate uh you providing an overview

2:14:10

of the Capital Region Water Board.

2:14:12

>> Well, thank you very much uh President

2:14:13

Hill and and fellow city council

2:14:15

members. Uh I stand before the the final

2:14:18

uh important business uh before this

2:14:21

board this evening and I think all of

2:14:22

the media will uh be look kindly upon me

2:14:26

if I'm brief. Uh Capitol Region Water is

2:14:29

a Pennsylvania municipal authority that

2:14:31

provides drinking water, wastewater, and

2:14:33

storm water services for Harrisburg and

2:14:35

parts of surrounding municipalities. The

2:14:38

board of directors governors governs the

2:14:40

authority under the Pennsylvania

2:14:42

Municipal Authorities Act, setting

2:14:44

policy, adopting budgets and rates,

2:14:46

approving capital projects, and

2:14:48

overseeing management to protect the

2:14:50

public health and the environment of the

2:14:52

city of Harrisburg. Our current

2:14:54

membership status uh is that we are

2:14:56

governed by a five member volunteer

2:14:58

board. All five seats are currently

2:15:00

filled with Chairman Karowski and myself

2:15:04

both being on expired terms. Mr. Kowski

2:15:07

as of 2019, myself as of 2020. Three

2:15:11

remaining board members are Karen

2:15:13

Balivan, Shaes Werver, and Pierre McCoy

2:15:17

serving on consecutive expiring terms of

2:15:19

2026, 2027, and 2028.

2:15:24

We meet regularly at 6 PM on the fourth

2:15:27

Wednesday of each month, typically in

2:15:29

November and December. Those are subject

2:15:31

to some change. Uh mostly because of our

2:15:33

budget in November. We're already

2:15:35

starting our budget process uh for 2026.

2:15:39

Our meetings are held at 3003 North

2:15:41

Front Street. They are open to the

2:15:42

public. They're advertised, offered in

2:15:45

person, both uh in person and virtually.

2:15:48

In addition, we record our meetings and

2:15:50

post that to our website. Um typically

2:15:52

within 24 hours after our meetings are

2:15:54

finished. We would love to have folks

2:15:56

visit our meetings. It's very lonely

2:15:59

most uh most months. Our reporting

2:16:02

structure is that capital region water

2:16:04

board members are nominated by the mayor

2:16:07

and appointed uh approved by city

2:16:09

council. Um we are subject to our own

2:16:12

articles and the Pennsylvania municipal

2:16:14

authorities act. Um and we look to be

2:16:17

accountable to not only the city of

2:16:19

Harrisburg but also Pennsylvania

2:16:21

Department of Environmental Protection

2:16:22

and the EPA. Um our public meetings um

2:16:27

we publish our financial reports and our

2:16:30

policies that are adopted by the board

2:16:31

are also published. Um qualifications

2:16:34

for appointment we would typically be

2:16:36

seeking uh certainly enthusiastic

2:16:39

volunteers that have familiarity with

2:16:41

utilities, infrastructure and the

2:16:42

environment. Um finance, law or

2:16:45

government experience. Uh and certainly

2:16:48

community stewardship and a a

2:16:50

stakeholder engagement willingness to

2:16:51

communicate and engage with the public.

2:16:54

That's my overview and thank you so much

2:16:55

for the opportunity to present.

2:16:57

>> Thank you. Thank you very much. Um, as

2:16:59

I've been doing, I will share the formal

2:17:02

reports and advice provided, annual

2:17:05

financial reports and audits submitted

2:17:08

in accordance with the municipality

2:17:10

authorities act shared with the city of

2:17:12

Harrisburg and the Commonwealth.

2:17:15

Regulatory compliance reports are filed

2:17:17

with the Pennsylvania Department of

2:17:19

Environmental Protection and the US

2:17:22

Environmental Protection Agency. And

2:17:24

then public notices and updates, rates,

2:17:28

rate changes, infrastructure projects,

2:17:31

and community impact reports are

2:17:33

provided to residents and businesses

2:17:35

through public meetings and official

2:17:37

publications.

2:17:39

As you noted, uh, the authority is

2:17:42

comprised of five members appointed by

2:17:45

the mayor. The term length is five

2:17:47

years. I don't have any questions, but I

2:17:50

did want to acknowledge the presence of

2:17:53

Miss Charlotte Katzenmeer, the CEO of

2:17:56

Capitol Region Water. Thank you for

2:17:58

being here tonight. Um, I'll open the

2:18:00

floor to my colleagues who may have some

2:18:02

questions for you. I will begin with uh,

2:18:06

Councilwoman Davis. Any questions?

2:18:09

>> Thank you, President Hill. Good evening.

2:18:11

I don't have any questions. You already

2:18:13

answered my questions, but thank you for

2:18:14

being here this evening.

2:18:15

>> Thank you.

2:18:17

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Any

2:18:19

questions?

2:18:19

>> Thank you, President Hill. I don't have

2:18:21

any questions for you. Thank you for

2:18:22

being with us tonight.

2:18:23

>> Thank you, Vice President.

2:18:24

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

2:18:26

questions?

2:18:28

>> No questions for me. Very descriptive. I

2:18:30

appreciate your time. Thank you for

2:18:31

joining us.

2:18:32

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Any

2:18:34

questions? Well, I'm going to speed up

2:18:36

as everybody else is. So, no, I have no

2:18:39

questions. And how you doing again, Miss

2:18:41

Charlotte? Oh, no. I just want to thank

2:18:43

you guys for uh what you're doing. Um,

2:18:46

actually me and um the the clerk here

2:18:48

had an opportunity to tour Deart uh and

2:18:52

then then the uh the facility down here

2:18:54

on Cameron. Um we also got an

2:18:56

opportunity to do that which um opened

2:18:59

our eyes to a lot of things that I think

2:19:01

you know um you guys are doing some good

2:19:02

things. So,

2:19:03

>> your first uh visit to Deart?

2:19:05

>> Absolutely. And I I was taken back by I

2:19:07

was like, "Wow, this is amazing." Yeah.

2:19:09

I wish more people could go see it. Uh

2:19:12

but I just want to thank you guys for

2:19:13

your work and and the service that

2:19:15

you're providing uh for the city

2:19:16

residents.

2:19:17

>> We have Deart Day coming up very very

2:19:19

shortly. So, it's open to the public and

2:19:20

we're going to be running uh

2:19:22

transportation up to Deart. So,

2:19:24

>> Okay. Get that information to us so we

2:19:26

can report that out. That that'll be

2:19:28

good. I think they uh because that was

2:19:30

one of my biggest things. cuz I always

2:19:31

wanted to know what happened with our

2:19:33

surge water and boy what an experience

2:19:38

but keep up the good work and I thank

2:19:40

you guys.

2:19:42

>> Thank you very much for joining us.

2:19:46

>> Okay, at this time we will open the

2:19:48

floor for public comment. Just a few

2:19:50

housekeeping notes before we begin.

2:19:52

Please state your name and your address

2:19:55

for the meeting record. If you don't

2:19:56

feel comfortable sharing your address,

2:19:58

please share the vicinity in which you

2:20:00

live within the city. You will have four

2:20:01

minutes to share your comments. Mr.

2:20:04

Trudale has added a green timer to the

2:20:09

TV screens for your reference. And I'll

2:20:12

begin to my right. Is there anyone that

2:20:14

would like to offer public comment?

2:20:16

Anything related to the boards and

2:20:18

commissions discussion during the policy

2:20:21

work session?

2:20:26

Good evening, council. I'm going to take

2:20:28

off my um EAC hat and put on my resident

2:20:31

hat. Um my name is Pamela Parson and I

2:20:35

live on Allison Hill. I'd like to thank

2:20:38

you for this really informative uh

2:20:41

program tonight and I hope it gets a lot

2:20:44

of views. I think it's information that

2:20:47

is not often shared especially in this

2:20:50

kind of uh format. I'd also particularly

2:20:54

uh appreciated that Capitol Region Water

2:20:57

was here as a Capital Region Water

2:20:59

Ambassador and also really glad that you

2:21:03

included the redevelopment authority

2:21:06

because authorities as quasi

2:21:08

governmental agencies are often really

2:21:11

hard to figure out how they work. And I

2:21:15

also appreciate um your questions um

2:21:19

especially uh Council Member Green and

2:21:23

Council Member RS about the

2:21:25

redevelopment authority. uh I have found

2:21:27

that it is very difficult for a citizen

2:21:31

to access that particular authority to

2:21:35

find the information that you're looking

2:21:37

for um to even attend a meeting because

2:21:41

the meetings often happen I think at

2:21:43

like 12 or 12:30. It's hard to get

2:21:46

there. It's hard to find the link if you

2:21:49

want to join virtually. And I did a

2:21:52

quick look tonight and in their meetings

2:21:56

from say 2022 to 2025, which is where

2:22:00

they have their minutes available. In

2:22:03

all of those meetings, there were only

2:22:05

five meetings where members of the

2:22:09

public were there and actually asked

2:22:11

questions or made public comment. Um, so

2:22:15

I think that's really important and I'm

2:22:18

glad that you were uh here. I'm glad

2:22:21

that the list of properties might

2:22:25

actually be public. Um I attended one of

2:22:28

their meetings back in 2023

2:22:32

I think and in asking that question

2:22:35

where are is this list of properties and

2:22:39

the question was not clearly answered

2:22:41

when I was there. So, it would be great

2:22:43

that if it would be at the website and

2:22:46

again, thank you very much for this um

2:22:49

session tonight.

2:22:51

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:22:53

right that would like to offer public

2:22:55

comment?

2:22:57

>> Hello. Good evening, council. My name is

2:22:59

Paul Gellerman. I live in the Uptown

2:23:01

area. Um, I had a question just hearing

2:23:03

some of the board structures um and some

2:23:07

of the uh board appointees that have

2:23:09

been appointed by a city council that

2:23:12

might not be participating or fully

2:23:14

engaged with the boards. What what

2:23:17

measures or what power does city council

2:23:19

have to review their performance and

2:23:21

potentially remove them from those

2:23:23

boards?

2:23:26

>> That's a good question. I have not had

2:23:29

any experience of removal of a city

2:23:32

council appointee. I don't know if

2:23:34

that's something that the law bureau can

2:23:36

speak to.

2:23:37

>> So, it's it's going to be different with

2:23:39

each board because each board has its

2:23:41

own what I'd call enabling act.

2:23:43

>> Okay.

2:23:43

>> Um and but most boards the main reason

2:23:46

for a departure is if they have three

2:23:49

unexcused vacancies in a row, the

2:23:52

position can be reported as vacant. Um,

2:23:55

and in some boards you get appointed to

2:23:57

fulfill the remainder of that person's

2:23:59

term. On other boards you're appointed

2:24:02

to a full term. So, it just depends on

2:24:04

the board that you're on. Um, but uh

2:24:07

there is rarely there are provisions in

2:24:09

some of the authorities for removal for

2:24:11

more serious conduct. Um, I'm unaware of

2:24:14

that ever being an issue where there's

2:24:18

actually a conduct kind of question.

2:24:19

It's really about some people just

2:24:21

because they're busy and as a volunteer

2:24:23

just can't get there, you know.

2:24:25

>> Okay. Thank you.

2:24:27

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:24:29

right that would like to offer public

2:24:31

comment?

2:24:35

>> Yes.

2:24:36

>> If you wouldn't mind coming to the

2:24:40

>> to the microphone. Um,

2:24:42

>> if you could please say your name and

2:24:43

your address or

2:24:44

>> say beloved Jesus. I'm 2128 Green

2:24:48

Street. This is my first time I've been

2:24:51

back for a few years. And I know Miss

2:24:53

Green, she knows me. Um my uh one thing

2:24:59

I want to make a complaint that there's

2:25:00

these bumps that are on Division Street

2:25:02

and on Third and Sixth. And I have

2:25:06

electric bike. And I'm going to tell you

2:25:08

what, I'm not a car, but I'm a bike. got

2:25:10

a flat tire because after they did the

2:25:13

bump, there's some gravel and stuff

2:25:16

after it. And then they to do two posts

2:25:18

too after that. So, a bicycle could go

2:25:21

by it. But what the problem is too,

2:25:24

there's cars that will park in front of

2:25:26

those two coasts. So, the bicycle is

2:25:30

going to go over the hump anyway. Okay.

2:25:32

Now, next stopping. Now, my next subject

2:25:34

is the my last time that was at this

2:25:37

market. This this

2:25:40

city council meeting was when I had four

2:25:42

tickets from a family from Africa and

2:25:45

you had a president and she said that

2:25:48

she would take care of those four

2:25:49

tickets.

2:25:51

And guess what? I got a phone call from

2:25:53

the car owners from Pittsburgh that

2:25:57

nothing was ever done on those tickets.

2:25:59

And I come down here and I go to that

2:26:01

office up there and she ain't round but

2:26:04

I'm hollering and I had the secretary

2:26:06

got two of those tickets resolved. I

2:26:08

paid the other two off

2:26:11

and um the last thing was that was

2:26:14

really the last time that I cave came

2:26:17

back down city council until tonight

2:26:21

because she has been nothing more than

2:26:23

totally deceitful. The broad street

2:26:26

market is unbelievable. You get you

2:26:29

donated money in the beginning but where

2:26:31

did the money go? And then I know it

2:26:33

went to the board.

2:26:35

Hello for the Broad Street Market. I've

2:26:38

been in this city for I've been in my

2:26:40

house for 34 years. I know about the

2:26:43

Broad Street Market when it was shut

2:26:45

down for years because of the roaches.

2:26:48

There's many stories, but manage

2:26:50

management is a big issue and the fact

2:26:53

is with her to try to do this big show

2:26:56

that she's been doing to try this into

2:26:59

historic. It's a modern historic in

2:27:02

between the two buildings.

2:27:04

Yoohoo. Come on down. Welcome to Heagen

2:27:08

Harrisburg. My house is from 1886 and I

2:27:12

bought it 30ome years ago and I have

2:27:14

built it from the foundation to the

2:27:16

roof.

2:27:19

Okay? And when I say what I say, if that

2:27:22

boarding would that when that building

2:27:23

burnt, if there would have been some

2:27:25

Christian more

2:27:28

Amish individuals to come around, that

2:27:30

building would have been done in a year

2:27:32

to a year and a half finished

2:27:35

professionally

2:27:36

done in the name of Jesus Christ there.

2:27:40

So there I'm I'm done. I love you all. I

2:27:43

do the Harrisburg Food Ministry right

2:27:45

out of my driveway. I'm 210 Street. They

2:27:48

give me the food there at that little

2:27:50

tent now at the Broad Street Market.

2:27:52

It's more of a blessing I could ever

2:27:54

have. Okay. So, thank you very much.

2:27:57

>> Thank you.

2:27:59

>> Is there anyone else to my right that

2:28:01

would like to offer public comment?

2:28:05

Okay. Seeing and hearing no one. Anyone

2:28:07

in the middle section?

2:28:19

Good evening, council. Um, I'm still

2:28:22

working on the development of the

2:28:24

Cameron Street project. This is the

2:28:26

before and the after.

2:28:30

Um,

2:28:31

we just got before I start, my name is

2:28:34

Libby Profit.

2:28:36

I am resigning at 2025 Chestnut Street

2:28:40

in Harrisburg.

2:28:42

This project is featured on the website

2:28:44

ww.

2:28:48

E

2:28:53

excuse me, so much going on in my head

2:28:55

right now. Capital city. The water is

2:28:57

here.

2:29:03

>> This project is on uh intellect.com.

2:29:08

That's I N T L E Cs.com.

2:29:15

You look at it, you'll see my website.

2:29:18

I'm a consultant and this if you want to

2:29:21

learn more, this project is under there.

2:29:23

We have just uh got some guys to do the

2:29:28

drafts and the design that would

2:29:31

eventually come in front of I guess the

2:29:34

first board would be the uh plan. No,

2:29:37

the historic board. So hopefully we

2:29:39

don't have any issues

2:29:42

with 1321 North Cameron Street and then

2:29:46

it goes up into planning and zoning and

2:29:50

such. So, I wanted the uh the residents

2:29:55

of Harrisburg to know that we are

2:29:57

redeveloping this and um where they can

2:30:00

go to learn about new information.

2:30:04

And as the plans come through, when the

2:30:06

prints come through, I'll upload it so

2:30:08

they can see as well as um a couple of

2:30:12

times in this month, I'll stop by and

2:30:14

I'll do getting signatures from

2:30:17

community. Make sure that you guys get

2:30:19

the black and white

2:30:22

of everything that you need.

2:30:26

So, I wanted to um mention that

2:30:30

I did learn a few things about these

2:30:34

hearing boards.

2:30:37

The redevelopment authority, Mr. Brian

2:30:40

Davis, I emailed him because I'm in the

2:30:43

redevelopment project um business

2:30:46

currently and I did email him yesterday.

2:30:48

I didn't get a response as to how I can

2:30:52

get a hold of the property that I think

2:30:54

several people in this room said that

2:30:56

there is no list but there is a list but

2:30:59

I want I emailed him request and I

2:31:01

didn't get anything but he was here

2:31:02

earlier um

2:31:05

and maybe he'll return my email because

2:31:07

I emailed so many people as far as

2:31:10

Capitol City waters um

2:31:17

their rates are based on national rates.

2:31:19

That's nauseiating knowing that right

2:31:22

around the corner, Saskana and and Sue

2:31:25

Water and all of them rates are much

2:31:28

much less. So they're they're stating

2:31:31

that their rates are based on national

2:31:33

rates. I live in Harrisburg. I do not

2:31:35

want to pay the same rates as the people

2:31:37

living in California. So where they're

2:31:39

getting their data from and they're

2:31:40

doing these rates is totally fraudulent.

2:31:44

The properties they're calling it

2:31:46

leanable. They have a company in New

2:31:49

Jersey that's putting fines and fees on

2:31:51

people's

2:31:53

bills with potential turnoff because

2:31:57

they didn't get access. Some LLC

2:32:00

plumbing company wants access to

2:32:02

people's home and if you don't give them

2:32:04

access, $515.

2:32:06

I know because it's been on my bill and

2:32:08

I currently am pursuing this issue

2:32:12

via the Supreme Court. Thank you for

2:32:14

your um time. Good night.

2:32:19

>> Thank you. Is there anyone else in the

2:32:21

middle section that would like to offer

2:32:23

public comment? Seeing and hearing no

2:32:25

one, anyone to my left? Seeing and

2:32:28

hearing no one, before we adjourn, I

2:32:30

wanted to note that the board's

2:32:32

commission authorities, you might have

2:32:34

seen council members referencing this

2:32:36

document throughout the evening. Um, a

2:32:39

PDF version is available on the city's

2:32:43

website on e-codes under public

2:32:46

documents and then miscellaneous meeting

2:32:49

materials 2025. It's the first link. So,

2:32:53

I'd like to thank uh the city clerk's

2:32:56

office uh Jared Trudale for your hard

2:33:00

work in drafting this document. I know

2:33:03

it was very tedious and you were very

2:33:05

meticulous in ensuring the information

2:33:08

here was accurate and correct. So, thank

2:33:11

you for that. Okay, everyone. The time

2:33:14

is 8:10 p.m. I will entertain a motion

2:33:18

to adjourn our policy work session.

2:33:21

>> So, moved.

2:33:22

>> Second. Thank you. I hope everyone found

2:33:25

this to be an informative uh work

2:33:27

session. That's our goal. And if you

2:33:30

want to reference the document, please

2:33:32

do. Thank you for your attendance

2:33:33

>> and thank you President Hill for this.

2:33:36

This is very good. I think everybody

2:33:38

enjoyed that.

2:33:39

>> Thank you.

2:34:49

Excuse me everyone. We aren't finished

2:34:52

with our business this evening. We do

2:34:54

have a special legislative session.

2:34:59

>> So, I'll give everyone a few minutes to

2:35:01

regroup.

2:35:42

to go right into this special

2:35:44

legislative session rather reluctantly,

2:35:47

but here we are. The time is 8:13 p.m. I

2:35:51

would like to call this special

2:35:53

legislative session to order.

2:35:57

Mr. Trudeell, could you please call the

2:35:59

role?

2:36:03

Miss Daniels,

2:36:07

Miss Davis,

2:36:08

>> present.

2:36:10

>> Miss Green,

2:36:11

>> present.

2:36:12

>> Mr. Jones,

2:36:13

>> here.

2:36:14

>> Miss Rolls.

2:36:21

She's trying to talk. It's green.

2:36:25

Mr. Rodriguez.

2:36:32

Oh, that's on me this time.

2:36:36

>> Sorry, let's do that again.

2:36:38

>> Yep, I got you. Miss Rolls,

2:36:41

>> present. Can you hear me?

2:36:43

>> Yeah. Yep. Thank you. Miss Hill

2:36:45

>> present. Thank you. The invocation will

2:36:48

be led this evening by Councilwoman

2:36:50

Davis, followed by the pledge of

2:36:52

allegiance, which will be led by

2:36:54

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:36:56

>> Thank you, President Hill.

2:37:00

I would like us to take a moment to

2:37:02

honor the life of Pastor D. Gilmore, the

2:37:07

second administrative assistant to the

2:37:10

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Ecclesiastical

2:37:13

Jurisdiction.

2:37:15

He served as the superintendent of the

2:37:18

Harrisburg District and was the pastor

2:37:20

of Mount Calvary Church of God in

2:37:23

Christ.

2:37:25

Pastor Gilmore, 90, son of the late Roy

2:37:29

Gilmore and the late Lahi Williams, was

2:37:32

born in Roxboro, North Carolina. He

2:37:35

received his doctorate of divinity

2:37:37

degree from Emmanuel Baptist University

2:37:42

of Connelly Spring, North Carolina.

2:37:45

Pastor Gilmore transferred from this

2:37:48

earthly life into eternal life on

2:37:51

Thursday, September 25th, 2025

2:37:55

in the UPMC osteopathic hospital.

2:38:00

He was a husband, a father, a pastor,

2:38:03

and spiritual father to many. His legacy

2:38:07

continues through his family, his

2:38:09

church, and the many who learned from

2:38:11

him. Pastor Gilmore exemplified what it

2:38:15

meant to live a life of integrity and

2:38:17

great character. A life that was

2:38:20

well-lived and a race wellrun.

2:38:24

Pastor Gilmore is will be greatly missed

2:38:27

by all who knew him.

2:38:30

And the services will be held this

2:38:34

Friday at 8:00 a.m. through 11 a.m. And

2:38:40

then the funeral will start at 11:00

2:38:43

a.m. and the location will be at Shiloh

2:38:46

Baptist Church on Dair Street. I would

2:38:49

just like us to take a moment to honor

2:38:54

him and um

2:38:59

reflect on his memory.

2:39:04

Thank you.

2:39:07

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Davis. The

2:39:09

Pledge of Allegiance will be led by

2:39:10

Councilman Rodriguez.

2:39:14

>> All rise for the pledge.

2:39:17

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

2:39:20

United States of America and to the

2:39:22

republic for which it stands, one nation

2:39:25

under God, indivisible, with liberty and

2:39:28

justice for all.

2:39:32

Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. We do

2:39:34

not have any communications this

2:39:36

evening.

2:39:38

We will open the floor again for

2:39:40

courtesy of the floor.

2:39:42

Just a few housekeeping notes, the same

2:39:45

notes. Please state your name and your

2:39:47

address for the meeting record. If you

2:39:48

don't feel comfortable sharing your

2:39:50

address, please share the vicinity in

2:39:52

which you live within the city. You will

2:39:54

have four minutes to share your

2:39:56

comments. Mr. Trudale has added the

2:39:58

timer back to the screen for your

2:40:00

reference. I'll begin to my right. Is

2:40:03

there anyone that would like to offer

2:40:05

public comment?

2:40:11

Council

2:40:13

members, uh Bruce Weber, 428 Bow Street.

2:40:17

Just want to uh speak in favor of the

2:40:21

legislation in front of you this

2:40:22

evening. Um obviously the bu rebuild of

2:40:25

the Broad Street Market is key towards

2:40:27

economic development and continued

2:40:30

revitalization of uh the city. Uh and uh

2:40:34

although it's uh been a long and winding

2:40:37

process, hopefully we're finally seeing

2:40:40

a little uh light after the darkness and

2:40:43

uh this uh is important uh for uh you

2:40:48

know important legislation and for your

2:40:51

consideration. And along those lines, I

2:40:53

just want to bring up that I think it's

2:40:56

also potentially a good opportunity to

2:41:00

uh suggest that there may be a funding

2:41:02

gap here as has been discussed. It's

2:41:05

hard to know exactly uh what it is, how

2:41:08

much it is uh and uh uh how big that

2:41:13

delta may be, but uh the city uh

2:41:16

currently um does not have a credit

2:41:19

rating and has not accessed the public

2:41:21

debt market in uh about 27 years I think

2:41:24

at this point. and uh

2:41:28

the city's uh ability to uh secure

2:41:32

funding uh for any uh needs uh that uh

2:41:39

currently they don't have opportunities

2:41:42

to get from other uh sources such as

2:41:45

grants or uh you know uh the typical

2:41:49

revenue sources.

2:41:51

uh

2:41:53

that they really will have to use the

2:41:55

cash that's available in the general

2:41:57

fund of the city. I don't know what that

2:42:00

balance is at this point. Uh but uh you

2:42:04

know once you use cash, it's gone. It's

2:42:06

very hard to reclaim it. So I think

2:42:08

there's an opportunity here to uh

2:42:12

perhaps uh look at going back into the

2:42:14

public market. uh the matching principle

2:42:17

of assets to liabilities. The rebuild of

2:42:20

the market is a building that will uh be

2:42:23

around for 30 plus years. Uh when you

2:42:26

you know uh go to the debt market,

2:42:28

you're talking somewhere between 10 to

2:42:29

30 years. Yes, there is a cost with

2:42:32

interest. Uh but that those costs are

2:42:35

spread out. Uh so in theory even though

2:42:39

this is takes a lot of work and there's

2:42:41

a lot of uh cooperation between uh the

2:42:46

administration uh and council to

2:42:48

facilitate something like this

2:42:50

considering it has not been done in a

2:42:52

while. Uh it it could provide a real

2:42:54

opportunity to do two things at one time

2:42:56

which is both you know show off uh what

2:43:00

can be done uh you know uh with with the

2:43:04

city with some imagination and

2:43:05

creativity with the actually building of

2:43:07

the market and then show that the city's

2:43:10

you know has the financial wherewithal

2:43:12

to actually go back to uh the the public

2:43:15

market uh and secure a credit rating uh

2:43:18

and show that uh you know its economic

2:43:20

vibrancy uh is also there to be uh

2:43:25

highlighted at this at the same time. So

2:43:28

anyways, thank you very much for your

2:43:29

time and uh good luck tonight with the

2:43:32

vote.

2:43:33

Thank you. Is there anyone else to my

2:43:35

right that would like to offer public

2:43:37

comment? Okay, seeing and hearing no

2:43:39

one, anyone in the middle section?

2:43:42

Okay, seeing and hearing no one, anyone

2:43:44

to my left? Seeing and hearing no one,

2:43:47

we will move forward with the meeting

2:43:49

agenda.

2:43:51

Next, approval of minutes. We do not

2:43:54

have any minutes for approval. Next, we

2:43:56

have reports of committees. The sole

2:43:59

committee report you will hear this

2:44:01

evening will be delivered by Vice

2:44:03

President Green on behalf of the budget

2:44:05

and finance committee on the work

2:44:07

session of September 23rd, 2025.

2:44:12

Thank you, President Hill. I will try to

2:44:14

be brief but um still thorough. The

2:44:17

budget and finance committee met during

2:44:19

the work session of September 23rd,

2:44:21

2025. We discussed resolution 63 of

2:44:24

2025, a resolution approving the six

2:44:27

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

2:44:30

related to the rebuild of the Broad

2:44:31

Street Market brick building. We had a

2:44:34

pre presentation from Mr. McCutchen to

2:44:36

go over the proposed budget

2:44:38

reallocation. The total reallocation

2:44:40

request for the Broad Street Market

2:44:41

project is $14,416,912.

2:44:47

This estimate will cover the the entire

2:44:49

estimated cost of completing the Brawl

2:44:51

Street Market brick building and

2:44:52

upgrades. The total estimated cost at

2:44:55

this moment for the project is $19.12

2:44:58

million according to the provided

2:45:00

schedule. The funds for this project are

2:45:03

being reallocated from various general

2:45:04

revenue funds, including $9.1 million

2:45:07

from the cash carryover, also known as

2:45:09

the fund balance. In discussion, Mr.

2:45:12

McCutchen and the city solicitor, uh,

2:45:14

Mr. Neil Grover noted that the amount

2:45:16

received from insurance will likely

2:45:18

increase as they go through the process

2:45:20

of sorting out what category repairs and

2:45:22

upgrades fall into. The solicitor also

2:45:24

noted that this resolution is

2:45:26

time-sensitive as the contracts cannot

2:45:29

be signed or executed until the funds

2:45:31

are made available to fulfill the

2:45:32

contracts. We did request a breakdown

2:45:35

and a presentation of the estimated cost

2:45:37

so that the city council as well as the

2:45:39

public can be informed on what the

2:45:41

estimated work and final project for the

2:45:42

broad street market will look like. City

2:45:45

Council was provided a brief breakdown

2:45:46

of the budget to include what items,

2:45:49

excuse me, what items the funds

2:45:51

requested for

2:45:53

as well as the estimated timelines for

2:45:55

the work to be completed. During

2:45:57

tonight's meeting, I will ask to open

2:45:58

the floor for discussion to see if the

2:46:00

administration would like to present

2:46:01

this information that they provided to

2:46:03

us via email as well as any further

2:46:05

questions from city council. The Broad

2:46:08

Street Market is a pillar of our

2:46:09

community and the residents have been

2:46:11

very vocal. So they want it restored and

2:46:12

upgraded to keep its original historic

2:46:14

charm while bringing modern amenities.

2:46:17

With that being said, we all also must

2:46:19

be cognizant of the city's funds and

2:46:22

understanding the overall cost and its

2:46:23

impact on the city's short and long-term

2:46:25

financial stability is something that we

2:46:27

have to evaluate. As noted last week,

2:46:30

this is a multi-year project that will

2:46:32

run across multiple budget years in

2:46:34

order for the contracts to be executed,

2:46:36

the work um excuse me on for the

2:46:38

contracts to be executed and the work to

2:46:40

be started. The funds have to be made

2:46:42

available. Now, with that being said, if

2:46:45

this resolution would pass tonight, I

2:46:47

would implore the administration to not

2:46:49

only look for other funding sources so

2:46:52

that we do not put a strain on the

2:46:53

city's fund balance, but also ensure

2:46:55

that our budget for the next two years

2:46:57

includes intentional efforts to plus up

2:47:00

our fund balance as we are still in a

2:47:02

position where the city cannot borrow

2:47:03

money for capital need improvement

2:47:05

projects and we don't want to put

2:47:06

ourselves in a positions of not being

2:47:08

able to complete necessary work in the

2:47:10

future. Uh, that concludes my report.

2:47:13

Thank you.

2:47:14

>> Thank you. We do not have any ordinances

2:47:17

for first reading or ordinances for

2:47:20

amendment and there are no ordinances

2:47:22

for final passage for consideration.

2:47:25

Tonight we have resolution 63 of 2025.

2:47:29

Mr. Trudale, could you please read it

2:47:31

into the record?

2:47:33

Resolution 63 2025, a resolution

2:47:37

approving the six proposed 2025 budget

2:47:39

reallocation related to the rebuild of

2:47:41

the Broad Street Market brick building.

2:47:44

>> Thank you. Um I will entertain a motion

2:47:47

to suspend the rules for further

2:47:49

discussion.

2:47:50

>> So move.

2:47:51

>> Is there a second?

2:47:52

>> Second.

2:47:53

>> Thank you. I will defer to our budget

2:47:55

and finance committee chair, Vice

2:47:57

President Green, to lead discussion.

2:48:00

>> Thank you, President Hill. Uh I would

2:48:01

like to ask if there's anyone from the

2:48:03

administration. I know we have uh Mr.

2:48:05

Baker as well as Mr. McCutchen here. Uh

2:48:07

if you would like to come and take a

2:48:09

seat at the table uh and maybe go over

2:48:11

some of the information that you sent to

2:48:13

council over the last day or so. Uh that

2:48:15

kind of goes over this the timeline uh

2:48:18

when we're looking for the market to be

2:48:20

completed. I know you sent some a couple

2:48:22

of renderings. um if you just could

2:48:24

provide any more information on the

2:48:25

project itself, some of the things that

2:48:27

are going to be covered, some of the

2:48:28

upgrades we might be looking to do to

2:48:30

the market and what we're looking for

2:48:31

the final project itself to look like.

2:48:33

Um and Mr. McCutchkins, if you could

2:48:36

provide uh some information more on the

2:48:38

financial side, I know you gave us some

2:48:40

information as to what the the cost

2:48:42

would cover um as far as like specific

2:48:45

materials and things like that. and if

2:48:47

you could also give us just a a brief

2:48:48

standpoint on where the city's fund

2:48:50

balance currently lies so that we can

2:48:52

have that information as we're looking

2:48:54

to dip into it. That was a lot that I

2:48:57

asked for. Hopefully you guys heard all

2:48:58

of it. Um it's it's kind of a long-

2:49:01

winded request for the same request that

2:49:03

I made last week.

2:49:09

>> You want to go first?

2:49:10

>> Whoever would like to start.

2:49:12

>> All right. Uh yes. Good evening, city

2:49:15

council members. Thank you, Brian

2:49:17

McCutchen, accounting manager.

2:49:20

Thank you, Vice President Green, for

2:49:22

that reference for that schedule that I

2:49:25

distributed today as a followup uh for

2:49:30

your request last Tuesday evening.

2:49:33

My efforts here were to try to make it

2:49:36

more concise and a little more

2:49:39

uh a better path to follow as compared

2:49:43

to how I presented last Tuesday with

2:49:45

with line and and and uh line after

2:49:48

line.

2:49:49

>> Just one moment, Mr. McCutchen. Sure.

2:49:51

Mr. Trusa, could you pull it up? Yes.

2:49:56

>> Just so the public can see it as well.

2:49:58

>> I I I appreciate the opportunity to see

2:50:01

my work.

2:50:18

So, I have a print out of the uh

2:50:19

construction timeline. Would that be

2:50:21

beneficial to pass out to you guys right

2:50:23

now or is digital copy sufficient?

2:50:26

>> Um, it it'd be beneficial to print uh

2:50:28

give us a printed copy. I did print a

2:50:30

copy myself, but

2:50:56

Oh, all right. Very good. Uh, so this

2:51:01

this schedule it reflects and it does

2:51:04

tie in to the the re uh the the six

2:51:07

budget reallocation proposed last week.

2:51:10

uh the the totals do reconcile, but what

2:51:13

I was trying to illustrate here is a is

2:51:15

a history of um what's been paid through

2:51:20

the end of um August of of 25. Uh you

2:51:26

can see that column B reflects what

2:51:27

we've paid in 24

2:51:30

including the project construction

2:51:32

manager and the architect. And there

2:51:34

were firms contracted to do for the most

2:51:37

part the these are these firms did

2:51:39

demolition type work. Um in 2025

2:51:44

uh payments through into 2025 through

2:51:47

the end of August mainly it really is

2:51:50

only going to be the the project manager

2:51:52

and and the architect. So as of the end

2:51:55

of August, we still have commitments or

2:51:58

incumbrance balance balances that are

2:52:01

out there and the anticipation is that

2:52:03

they will be liquidated prior to the end

2:52:06

of the year. That's that's an

2:52:07

assumption, but it's it's a reasonable

2:52:09

one.

2:52:10

So, prior to the heavy I'll call them

2:52:13

the heavier construction costs that are

2:52:16

uh that are being currently uh worked

2:52:20

upon and and and and teeing up in our

2:52:22

our incumbrance system and these are

2:52:24

estimates and based on the the the

2:52:28

involved lines for for these heavy

2:52:30

construction cost. So, and and Jared, if

2:52:33

you could just scroll up slightly. Thank

2:52:35

you. So again, where I left off with,

2:52:39

you know, the 3.338

2:52:41

million relates to those vendors up

2:52:43

above. So before we get to the the

2:52:46

construction vendors, so to speak, the

2:52:49

the all all this time that's passed, the

2:52:52

the the the magic number, if you will,

2:52:55

tends to be the 23 plus million in total

2:52:58

cost for this this particular project.

2:53:01

So if you reduce the 23 million by what

2:53:04

we've paid essentially through the end

2:53:05

of this year, that gets us down to the

2:53:08

1969.

2:53:10

And then it's carved out by those lines

2:53:13

uh that are illustrated there. You can

2:53:16

see that. And so that's again an

2:53:20

estimate and it's a high estimate

2:53:21

because there's uh these amounts reflect

2:53:24

any potential contingencies that may

2:53:27

arise. they they may they may not arise

2:53:29

to this level, but it's it's it pertains

2:53:32

to chain change orders. When contractors

2:53:35

start doing work and they go along, they

2:53:36

discover something else needs to be

2:53:38

addressed.

2:53:40

So, with that of 19.693 million, how do

2:53:43

we how does the city address that? Well,

2:53:45

$500,000 has already been appropriated

2:53:48

in the host fee fund. It has not been

2:53:50

utilized yet. So the 19 remaining 19193

2:53:55

that's what we're saying as as these

2:53:58

vendors and these contracts move forward

2:54:00

through the purchasing system of of the

2:54:02

of the city which essentially represents

2:54:04

committing to encumbering

2:54:07

uh uh the balances or encumbering the

2:54:10

budget the available budget. We look at

2:54:12

what's available as of the end of August

2:54:14

and that's the 4,776.

2:54:17

So there's where the difference between

2:54:19

those two is that number that's you've

2:54:21

seen and and referenced the 14.4

2:54:24

million. So that will reconcile back to

2:54:27

the proposed reallocation schedule.

2:54:30

That's the ask the 14.4 million to

2:54:33

increase the city's general fund budget

2:54:35

up to the 19.193.

2:54:38

That's that's that's the only expense

2:54:40

line that that was appearing on that

2:54:42

schedule for Broad Street Market. The

2:54:44

rest of the lines that flow below which

2:54:46

are not reflected here. I didn't want to

2:54:48

recmplicate things just how what what

2:54:52

are the revenue sources that are

2:54:53

available

2:54:55

uh to accommodate such an increase in

2:54:57

general fund budget expense.

2:55:00

Um

2:55:03

and that's completes that that schedule

2:55:06

summarized up uh for you. If you have

2:55:08

any comments or questions, I'd be happy

2:55:11

to try to answer for you.

2:55:15

I don't have any questions on this

2:55:16

schedule. Does I will start to my far

2:55:18

left.

2:55:20

>> No, I'll start to my far right.

2:55:22

Councilwoman Davis.

2:55:24

>> Thank you, Vice President Green. Good

2:55:26

evening. I'm going to hold off on my

2:55:29

questions. Okay.

2:55:31

>> Thank you.

2:55:32

>> Thank you, President Hill.

2:55:34

>> Yes. I'm going to read uh questions from

2:55:37

an email that was received last

2:55:39

Wednesday following last Tuesday's uh

2:55:44

council meeting.

2:55:48

As a longtime Harrisburg resident and

2:55:50

taxpayer, I care deeply about the broad

2:55:53

street market and and about how the city

2:55:56

manages large public expenditures. After

2:55:59

reviewing the six proposed 2025 budget

2:56:03

reallocation adjustment that was

2:56:06

presented to council, I was struck by

2:56:08

how difficult it is for an ordinary

2:56:10

citizen to follow where the money for

2:56:12

this restoration is actually coming from

2:56:15

and whether the sources are secured. I'm

2:56:18

asking that you please forward the

2:56:21

following concerns to members of city

2:56:23

council so they can be addressed

2:56:24

publicly. From my reading of the

2:56:27

spreadsheet, the amendment increases the

2:56:29

Broad Street Market Fire Loss

2:56:31

Restoration budget by over $14 million,

2:56:35

but the listed transfers in transfers in

2:56:39

insurance reimbursements and grant lines

2:56:42

don't clearly add up to that amount. The

2:56:44

estimated cash carryover jumps by more

2:56:47

than $9 million, and one of the CDBG

2:56:51

transfer lines even shows a negative

2:56:53

year-to-ate revenue figure. There there

2:56:57

also aren't subtotals or notes

2:56:59

explaining each line, which makes it

2:57:01

hard to tell what's confirmed versus

2:57:04

what's anticipated.

2:57:06

Because of that, I'm hoping council can

2:57:08

clarify, among other things. First, how

2:57:11

many how exactly does the $14.4 million

2:57:15

amendment reconcile with the transfers,

2:57:18

grants, and reimbursements listed in the

2:57:20

spreadsheet?

2:57:23

>> Do you want to answer? I have a series

2:57:25

of questions.

2:57:26

>> Okay.

2:57:28

Um, so back back to that schedule that

2:57:32

we reviewed last week. Mhm.

2:57:35

>> So the the starting point is the

2:57:37

14,416,000

2:57:40

increase to expense. Um the rest of the

2:57:43

lines underneath that are all revenue

2:57:45

increases

2:57:48

in each one of the revenue lines within

2:57:50

the general fund. Um I can go line by

2:57:54

line if you like me to at this point.

2:57:58

>> I think that's what the request is

2:58:00

because he noted that

2:58:04

Yes, the the lines clearly didn't add up

2:58:07

to a certain amount and then that there

2:58:11

weren't subtotals or notes explaining

2:58:13

each line. So, if you could please

2:58:15

>> Okay. Um

2:58:19

Okay. Yeah. Thank you, Jared.

2:58:23

So, let me f let me show uh shift to

2:58:25

column H which is I believe the

2:58:29

what what the questions are referring to

2:58:32

which is the proposed budget amendment

2:58:35

request.

2:58:39

So the expense of 14.4 is funded by all

2:58:43

the lines that appear below. In other

2:58:45

words, if we would sum all the lines

2:58:48

below the 14.4 million, they would

2:58:52

perfectly add up to that same number.

2:58:56

Um

2:58:58

now the insurance reimbursement for loss

2:59:01

uh in in this year's appropriated budget

2:59:04

the city originally anticipated 4.5

2:59:08

million in insurance proceeds from the

2:59:11

carrier. So this request is adding an

2:59:14

additional 1.287 287 million to that

2:59:18

taking it up. Uh we're and you can see

2:59:22

what the available amount is over on uh

2:59:25

column column I.

2:59:28

But that is the the the anticipation for

2:59:31

an acceleration of cost which the city's

2:59:33

in in the process right now of

2:59:36

forwarding to the insurance carrier for

2:59:39

for reimbursement.

2:59:42

It's not the full amount of the

2:59:43

proceeds, but It's an increase to that

2:59:45

line from 4.5 million. Uh the next line

2:59:49

down is the the CDBG funds managed by

2:59:53

the building and housing department.

2:59:55

There's been a commitment of $1 million.

2:59:58

And

3:00:00

there's actually the the the reason for

3:00:02

the possible confusion about what the

3:00:04

questioner said about a negative. The

3:00:07

city has already started to transfer

3:00:10

money from the CDBG fund over to the

3:00:12

general fund. If you look at column F,

3:00:15

the that's the actual like what what has

3:00:18

actually occurred thus far this year

3:00:20

through the end of August. 418,000 means

3:00:23

we've already transferred from the CDBG

3:00:26

fund into the general fund. So, but that

3:00:30

line you'll note in column E, there's no

3:00:34

currently adopted budget. So, it wasn't

3:00:36

naturally it wasn't anticipated at the

3:00:39

beginning of the year. So, it's being

3:00:41

requested now. We've already received,

3:00:44

we've already transferred $418,000. The

3:00:46

max the currently maximum amount

3:00:49

available for the commitment is $1

3:00:50

million.

3:00:52

So when you compare the two, the 1

3:00:55

million gets the budget in the system.

3:00:58

It gets it there. And then the remaining

3:01:01

amount in column I just just reflects

3:01:05

that you know already actual is 418. The

3:01:09

budget will will appear at a million.

3:01:11

So, there'll be another $581,000

3:01:13

to go before the end of the year. And

3:01:16

and that line is based on what the

3:01:17

city's been paying to the architect.

3:01:22

>> Thank you. The next question is, for

3:01:25

each transfer in line, where is the

3:01:28

transfer out in the originating fund and

3:01:31

has it already been authorized by

3:01:33

council or another governing body?

3:01:37

Um the uh C council has not yet

3:01:42

authorized what's uh has been in in the

3:01:45

proposed column in in in column H for

3:01:47

the transfers.

3:01:49

Um

3:01:51

let me start with uh the capital

3:01:53

projects fund which is $825,000.

3:01:56

And again this was not in the city's

3:01:58

original

3:02:00

uh budget for 2025.

3:02:03

If you Jared, if you scroll down a

3:02:06

little bit

3:02:08

right there, okay, you can see uh the

3:02:12

third line down is capital projects

3:02:15

public works. That's the transfer out.

3:02:17

Now, that's only $375,000,

3:02:21

but the the difference of um it would be

3:02:27

400

3:02:29

$450,000

3:02:31

that there's two components to this. One

3:02:33

is the city's the hotel tax revenue that

3:02:35

comes in and also the street cut revenue

3:02:38

that uh is is realized.

3:02:42

Both of those revenue items are recorded

3:02:44

and deposited to the capital projects

3:02:46

fund, but the street cut money is of a

3:02:51

public works function and actually count

3:02:55

uh the city's appropriation for for this

3:02:58

year includes the public works function

3:03:00

side. Um the hotel tax money

3:03:04

uh consistent with the past is not an

3:03:07

appropriation because it simply comes

3:03:10

into the capital projects fund and then

3:03:12

we transfer it to the general fund which

3:03:15

is an appropriated revenue line item.

3:03:17

So, what making making this a shorter

3:03:21

story, we're increasing the the draw on

3:03:24

hotel tax

3:03:26

by $450,000, which is again it's uh that

3:03:31

that particular expenditure out of the

3:03:33

capital projects fund is not included in

3:03:35

the original bud budget ordinance,

3:03:37

consistent with the past. But the

3:03:39

375,000 is street cut money and again

3:03:42

that's in addition to what we would

3:03:44

normally utilize. that is part of the

3:03:47

public works function which is included

3:03:51

uh in this fund and is also included in

3:03:53

the original budget ordinance this year.

3:03:56

So the three the 37 or uh yes the 375

3:03:59

and and and the 450 make up the eight

3:04:01

and a quarter coming from the the

3:04:04

capital projects fund.

3:04:07

Um the next line down, if I may, the the

3:04:11

the blight remediation fund, uh original

3:04:14

appropriation this year was $100,000.

3:04:17

That is in the budget ordinance, and

3:04:20

that was meant to be a transfer to both

3:04:22

neighborhood services and the general

3:04:24

fund at 50,000.

3:04:27

I'm sorry, one was at 75,000, the other

3:04:29

one was at 25K.

3:04:32

So, we're adding $100,000 specifically

3:04:35

for the Broad Street Market

3:04:38

uh uh project. And you can see that the

3:04:42

in the blight fund down below under

3:04:44

other funds, there's there's two budget

3:04:46

units to accommodate that, the salvage

3:04:49

budget unit and the permit penalty.

3:04:52

So,

3:04:54

uh again, you can see the the split

3:04:56

there. The original appropriation for

3:04:58

for this year is meant for something

3:05:01

else for neighborhood services and

3:05:02

general fund, but now we're adding

3:05:04

$100,000 $50,000 each for those

3:05:07

particular expense lines in the blight

3:05:10

fund. So that's how and and the

3:05:12

transfers have yet to happen on what was

3:05:13

originally appropriated this year for

3:05:16

general fund and neighborhood services.

3:05:18

So doing the math with the $50,000

3:05:21

increases on each line, you can see what

3:05:23

ends up being available,

3:05:25

125 and 75 respectively for salvage and

3:05:29

penalty. But focusing back on Broad

3:05:32

Street, the the transfer out below the

3:05:34

250s 50K

3:05:37

uh equate to the $100,000 coming in to

3:05:40

the general fund from the blight

3:05:42

remediation fund. So that gets us

3:05:44

through that row. uh of the 100,000

3:05:48

coming from the blight fund.

3:05:54

Okay. Um the next line down is the state

3:05:57

grants fund and uh a large part of this

3:06:02

pertains to interest income that's been

3:06:05

generating

3:06:06

uh not direct in well not directly from

3:06:10

the American Rescue Plan Act funds as

3:06:13

you recall

3:06:15

that was um received into the federal

3:06:19

grants fund uh because it is it is a

3:06:22

federal sourced grant in in nature

3:06:25

resource. Um there were payments out of

3:06:28

that fund directly made and then the

3:06:32

40 plus million dollars was transferred

3:06:35

to the general fund as revenue

3:06:36

replacement

3:06:38

which is in compliance with uh the the

3:06:41

federal treasury government or or the

3:06:44

the the treasury portal when it when it

3:06:46

comes to handling managing and and

3:06:48

classifying that activity. Then council

3:06:51

came back, the mayor and council came

3:06:53

back with the various um economic

3:06:57

activities, programs, initiatives that

3:07:00

were funded

3:07:02

uh in in pieces, but then uh they were

3:07:06

funded by way of transferring the money

3:07:08

out of the general fund over to the the

3:07:10

grants fund, the state grants fund.

3:07:14

My my point on this is that money uh has

3:07:16

been transferred but a large piece of it

3:07:18

has been sitting for an extended period

3:07:20

as these projects unwind and and and

3:07:23

generate uh resulting activity. Along

3:07:26

the way, a significant amount of

3:07:28

interest income has been generated

3:07:29

within the in the grants fund. And

3:07:32

unlike

3:07:34

typically when it comes to interest

3:07:35

income on federal money, you you

3:07:37

sometimes more than you don't have to

3:07:40

return that money to the federal

3:07:41

government. the city does not that can

3:07:44

be uh that that money is good for the

3:07:46

city to keep and there's also a there's

3:07:49

no restriction on how it gets used. So

3:07:52

that 1.663

3:07:54

million uh approximately 1.3 million of

3:07:57

it represents what we estimate the

3:08:00

available accumulated interest income to

3:08:02

be that would be available to

3:08:04

accommodate uh and help the Broad Street

3:08:07

Market project.

3:08:11

Um there are other uh state uh grant

3:08:16

funding sources that represent amounts

3:08:18

that are that have previously been due

3:08:20

to the general fund. In other words,

3:08:23

there's been outlays made by the general

3:08:26

fund uh where there's a grant involved

3:08:30

but it's a reimbursement grant. So the

3:08:32

city had to fund upfront and then submit

3:08:35

to the grtor to be reimbursed wi-i which

3:08:37

has occurred and then that money comes

3:08:39

back to the grants fund waiting to be

3:08:42

transferred to the general fund which uh

3:08:44

there are a few programs that that just

3:08:46

has not happened yet. But we can do that

3:08:49

and also call that a a new revenue

3:08:53

resource for current year because it's

3:08:55

not in the original appropriation this

3:08:57

year.

3:09:00

That's the state grants fund. The next

3:09:02

line is is almost it is the identical

3:09:04

explanation. It's the federal grants

3:09:06

fund uh m much much lower. There are

3:09:11

uh similar grant uh related funds that

3:09:14

are due to the general fund again from

3:09:16

previous outlays made by the general

3:09:18

fund and and the general fund needs to

3:09:20

be and should be reimbursed. Um, one of

3:09:23

these for the federal grants fund, I'd

3:09:26

say about 75% of that 412,000

3:09:29

is comprised of a COVID 19 grant of

3:09:34

about $161,000

3:09:36

that occurred.

3:09:38

Uh, it was a there was a match portion

3:09:40

that came in relative to uh what the

3:09:43

city had spent for the HVAC project uh

3:09:47

for the public safety building.

3:09:50

And there's another piece that involves

3:09:52

police in u which is a federal program

3:09:54

al alcohol tobacco and fire which

3:09:57

relates to uh police overtime hours that

3:09:59

when they submit periodically

3:10:02

uh the city can be uh reimbursed for for

3:10:06

such activity. So again there's been a

3:10:08

buildup of such uh amounts that have

3:10:11

happened within the grant the federal

3:10:12

grants fund that are due back to the

3:10:14

general fund.

3:10:17

So when you add all those up, the 14.4

3:10:21

million less what I just went through,

3:10:23

we're still coming up with a gap of

3:10:26

9.128 million. And this relates back to

3:10:31

the city has to uh ree not re-evaluate

3:10:35

but evaluate its cash position uh to see

3:10:38

what the potential is, what the effect

3:10:40

or impact would be. And uh you President

3:10:44

Hill, you you you mentioned about the

3:10:46

the current cash balance of of the city.

3:10:49

Um through today, we we we don't have

3:10:53

revenue posted through today, but I can

3:10:57

I can uh estimate that right now we're

3:11:01

somewhere around uh between 19 million

3:11:04

and 19.5 million. That's as of the end

3:11:07

of end of September

3:11:09

in cash fund balance for the general

3:11:11

fund.

3:11:16

>> Okay. Few more questions. Are you okay?

3:11:19

>> Um I think you just mentioned this, but

3:11:21

I just want to clarify. What explains

3:11:24

the sudden $9.1 million increase in

3:11:27

estimated cash carryover? Was there an

3:11:30

audited surplus, a reclassification, or

3:11:33

some other adjustment?

3:11:37

this is the result of uh not being able

3:11:41

to produce another viable revenue

3:11:44

source.

3:11:46

Um so those lines below the 14 million

3:11:49

all represent just that trying to

3:11:53

uh develop or manage what is available

3:11:56

what can be utilized to help fund the

3:12:00

the budget increase. So you again that

3:12:04

that's where we were as far as

3:12:08

uh brainstorming if you will what what

3:12:11

what what what the potential funding

3:12:13

sources which include as I mentioned you

3:12:15

know a big chunk of this is CDBG

3:12:20

insurance earnings

3:12:22

um

3:12:24

I'm sorry in interest earnings and then

3:12:27

the the the the uh potential insurance

3:12:31

reimbursement

3:12:33

But again, it comes down to after you've

3:12:36

uh exhausted that yourself on on what

3:12:40

are are some solutions revenue-wise,

3:12:42

then this is this is what we get to as

3:12:44

far as a a bottom line gap.

3:12:49

>> Thank you. Has the additional $1.28 28

3:12:53

million in insurance reimbursement been

3:12:56

formally awarded or is it an estimate

3:12:59

pending settlement?

3:13:02

>> Um, it would it it would be an estimate

3:13:04

and it would be pending because the way

3:13:08

it would work is and the city's in

3:13:10

process right now of doing uh submitting

3:13:14

information. We we have already

3:13:16

submitted information to the insurance

3:13:18

carrier and I believe they reviewed a

3:13:22

significant amount of payments already

3:13:23

made and now they're they're asking for

3:13:25

proof of payment cancel check images if

3:13:28

if you will. Um the the total estimate

3:13:32

of insurance

3:13:34

that we have which kind of goes it kind

3:13:36

of dubtales with the total estimate of

3:13:38

the overall project cost of over 23

3:13:41

million is 11.7 million in total. And

3:13:45

again that's that's an estimate. Um, and

3:13:49

then you can take $1 million right off

3:13:51

the top of that because that that $1

3:13:53

million is specifically meant for cost

3:13:57

related to what the city has done to

3:13:59

accommodate the temporary site.

3:14:02

So, it has to be it has to be looked

3:14:03

upon or classified in that way. So, that

3:14:07

brings us down to say 10.7 million that

3:14:10

would be

3:14:11

uh available in insurance proceeds. And

3:14:15

it's also good to know or bear in mind

3:14:16

that the city has received insurance

3:14:18

proceeds previously which happened in

3:14:21

2023. Uh not quite $5 million has

3:14:25

already been received. So if you think

3:14:27

about actually I'm glad that came to

3:14:29

mind because that is already if if you

3:14:33

can look at it this way you can

3:14:35

characterize as already sitting in this

3:14:37

the city's cash fund balance. So that

3:14:41

increase of uh of 9.1 million would

3:14:44

would in effect include what has already

3:14:47

been received. You you can view it that

3:14:49

way.

3:14:50

Um

3:14:57

>> okay.

3:14:59

are

3:14:59

>> so council president, I will note that

3:15:01

at least the questions as framed

3:15:04

are using different terms than are used

3:15:07

in the city's budget and and bookkeeping

3:15:09

process. So, for example, that's not a

3:15:12

settlement that he just just referred to

3:15:14

in that question. I know you're reading

3:15:16

it. I'm just saying but the language of

3:15:18

the finance office, the language of the

3:15:21

of the business office, the language of

3:15:24

the law bureau will be different

3:15:26

>> and and this is to make apples apples

3:15:30

equal apples, you have to sort of get to

3:15:31

the same vocabulary.

3:15:34

>> Okay. Well, I just have a few more

3:15:36

questions. Are the state and federal

3:15:38

grant transfers fully awarded and under

3:15:41

contract now or are they projections? Is

3:15:45

that a clear question?

3:15:46

>> They are not awards. They are fund

3:15:49

balance numbers. They're different funds

3:15:51

in the city, right? So that's where

3:15:53

funds went into that's the name of the

3:15:55

city funds. I think one of the things

3:15:57

that gets lost in translation is that

3:16:00

when the city for example presents a

3:16:02

budget every November and you see let's

3:16:06

pick any align item. This is the revenue

3:16:08

number for the next year. This is the

3:16:11

projected expenditures. that is not all

3:16:13

the money in that fund. That fund is

3:16:16

balance that is not being proposed to be

3:16:19

spent above the number. And so that's

3:16:22

where it so that so it's not the same

3:16:24

thing as the audit of the of all the

3:16:27

books. It's a budget and that's why

3:16:28

they're two different things. So these

3:16:31

are funds and if you remember the B the

3:16:33

budget has a series of funds just like

3:16:35

the general fund, the host fund, the

3:16:36

transfer fund, the state grant fund,

3:16:38

they have numbers in them of a of an

3:16:41

outstanding balance that is there which

3:16:43

when they're accumulated a significant

3:16:46

portion of them go to what is called the

3:16:47

fund balance, you know, and Mr. McCussen

3:16:50

can speak to that. So what's really

3:16:52

happening is you are transferring money

3:16:54

that was not encumbered in 2025 that's

3:16:57

in the fund balance regardless of which

3:16:59

category it's in and being asked to add

3:17:02

that to expenditures in 2025 that were

3:17:05

not budgeted at the time the budget was

3:17:07

adopted. It's not the money wasn't

3:17:09

there, it's the money was not budgeted.

3:17:11

And so these aren't where people are

3:17:13

making assumptions of what the what the

3:17:15

what the categories are. These aren't

3:17:18

we're waiting for this federal grant.

3:17:19

We're waiting for a state grant. These

3:17:21

are balances we retain in those those

3:17:25

fund names that are in that have been

3:17:28

designated for the city. So I'm ju just

3:17:30

just for clarity of what they are. I

3:17:32

mean and I think it is hard to

3:17:33

understand but but the sometimes a label

3:17:37

does not is not what it sounds like.

3:17:39

>> Okay. Well, I'll just read the rest of

3:17:42

these questions since there's different

3:17:44

vocabulary for everyone. Um, what is the

3:17:48

timeline for actually receiving these

3:17:50

funds relative to contractor bidding and

3:17:53

construction? And what is the backup

3:17:55

plan if some of them are delayed or

3:17:58

denied?

3:17:59

Why does the CDBG transfer line show a

3:18:02

negative year-to-ate revenue of negative

3:18:06

$418,77?

3:18:09

Is that a posting error, a refer

3:18:13

reversal, or something else? Will

3:18:16

council or staff provide subtotals

3:18:19

showing total inflows and outflows for

3:18:21

this amendment so the public can see

3:18:23

that it balances? Can each line be

3:18:26

accompanied by a brief note or

3:18:29

supporting document, grant award

3:18:31

letters, insurance payout confirmations,

3:18:35

interfer authorizations, council

3:18:38

resolutions so citizens can verify that

3:18:41

the revenue is real.

3:18:43

If any of the listed sources are

3:18:46

contingent or speculative, which ones

3:18:49

are guaranteed and which ones are not?

3:18:52

Finally, what oversight mechanisms will

3:18:54

ensure that once these funds are

3:18:56

transferred, they are spent solely on

3:18:59

the Broad Street Market restoration as

3:19:02

described. These questions all stem

3:19:04

directly from the figures in the

3:19:06

spreadsheet, which you all can see. I'm

3:19:08

not opposing the restoration project. I

3:19:11

want it to succeed. But I believe

3:19:13

transparency on the funding sources will

3:19:16

build public trust and help council make

3:19:19

the most responsible decision. Thank you

3:19:22

for helping to provide clarity on this

3:19:24

important budget matter. I don't have

3:19:27

any other questions for Mr. McCutchen.

3:19:33

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross. Any

3:19:36

questions?

3:19:39

>> Um, good evening. Um, no, I don't have

3:19:41

any questions. Mine were all the same as

3:19:44

uh President um Hill's questions were.

3:19:47

Thank you.

3:19:49

>> Thank you, Councilman Rodriguez. Any

3:19:51

questions for Mr. McCutchen?

3:19:56

>> Uh, yes. Thank you. Um, thank you for

3:19:58

joining us. Uh, Director Baker, Mr.

3:20:01

McCuten, um, Mr. Brian, you had said the

3:20:06

$500,000 initially, that appropriation,

3:20:08

where did that come from again?

3:20:12

>> That would be uh Councilman Rodri

3:20:16

Rodriguez, I think you're referring to

3:20:17

what's already been appropriated out of

3:20:19

the host fee, host municipalities fee

3:20:22

fund.

3:20:24

>> And then the 375 that came from street

3:20:27

cut money, correct?

3:20:28

>> Oh,

3:20:29

um,

3:20:31

yes. 37 375 would be additional street

3:20:34

cuts funds and then the other piece to

3:20:38

that out of the capital projects fund is

3:20:40

the hotel tax additional draw which

3:20:43

would be 420 I'm sorry $450,000

3:20:48

additional hotel tax money to to draw

3:20:50

from that fund.

3:20:55

>> Okay. All right. Um

3:20:58

I definitely may have further questions.

3:21:00

I'm just trying to kind of puzzle some

3:21:02

things together. Um but but that's all

3:21:04

for right now. Thank

3:21:06

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones.

3:21:08

>> Uh thank you, Vice President Green, and

3:21:10

um thank you guys for showing up

3:21:12

tonight. Um I really don't have any

3:21:14

questions. I just want to, you know, put

3:21:16

my stance on on record. Um you know, uh

3:21:21

when we first did this and we looked at

3:21:22

this, I had a lot of questions about the

3:21:24

money, the transfer ins, the transfer

3:21:26

outs, how everything's e equaled up. And

3:21:29

Mr. Mr. McCussen, you did a wonderful

3:21:30

job of explaining to me what what those

3:21:33

things look like. Um but though for for

3:21:35

for the public's clarification, um even

3:21:38

as we heard public comment from Mr.

3:21:39

Weber tonight, um my concerns are the

3:21:42

same and I I'm very concerned about this

3:21:44

project. Um this is a lot of money

3:21:46

that's being moved with such a large gap

3:21:49

and without any concrete um way that

3:21:54

we're going to see this money come back

3:21:56

into the city. Um and and and again,

3:21:59

we're using cash. Um once this money is

3:22:02

gone, it's gone. I'm just a little

3:22:04

concerned. I will be voting in favor for

3:22:07

this, but I just want to put on record

3:22:09

what what my stance is on it. I am very

3:22:12

worried about seeing how um and I know a

3:22:15

lot of things were mentioned tonight. At

3:22:17

the end of the day, this is a lot of

3:22:18

money going out of the city. Um and and

3:22:20

and that's just my concern. So, um

3:22:23

that's all I have. No question. But if

3:22:25

you have something to give back, that's

3:22:26

fine.

3:22:27

>> Okay.

3:22:30

Oh, yeah. And now this may help. This

3:22:34

might help. Um,

3:22:38

let's just uh say as an example that the

3:22:42

project would would get completed by the

3:22:44

end of this year. We know that's not

3:22:45

going to happen. Project would be

3:22:47

completed

3:22:49

all

3:22:52

No, no pressure, Dave. Um

3:22:56

the um

3:22:59

all the invoices would come in, they

3:23:00

would all be paid. Cash cash out the

3:23:02

door. Okay. The all the transfers would

3:23:05

would would happen to come into play.

3:23:08

What would be the end result? The city

3:23:10

would pay 9.128 million from its cash

3:23:14

fund balance. Also assuming that the

3:23:16

insurance money would materialize.

3:23:19

the only the only line on this schedule

3:23:24

uh really that's of a uh I guess more of

3:23:28

a uh

3:23:30

an outlying uh estimate would be the

3:23:32

insurance funds because that's based on

3:23:35

timing and you know the the city would

3:23:38

be at the will of the insurance carrier

3:23:40

providing the proceeds but again you

3:23:43

know the project costs the uh the the

3:23:47

the

3:23:49

U heavy construction costs that are

3:23:50

already out being uh vetted right now

3:23:54

are are estimates and they're estimated

3:23:57

on the somewhat high end because they do

3:23:59

include contingencies which is always a

3:24:01

reasonable thing to to think about when

3:24:03

when you're planning cost expenditure on

3:24:06

a project. So

3:24:09

is that a huge hit? Obviously it is to

3:24:11

to the city's cash fund balance. It's

3:24:13

not the norm. But one thing that we've

3:24:16

we've mentioned and and maybe I need to

3:24:18

repeat it again. This is to and Dave I

3:24:22

know can comment more uh intelligently

3:24:24

on this. This is uh roughly an 18-month

3:24:28

project. You have the last quarter of

3:24:31

this year. You have all of next year and

3:24:33

and the early part of 2027.

3:24:35

So if you think about that, our payments

3:24:38

aren't going to be all bunched up

3:24:40

happening at the end of this year. It's

3:24:42

going to be over that same time frame.

3:24:44

And we've we've we've tried to gauge

3:24:47

that percentage-wise. And that's that's

3:24:50

another estimate, you know, figuring

3:24:52

maybe save 40% this year to handle

3:24:55

upfront heavier cost, 45% next year, and

3:24:58

then maybe 15% in 2027. But that all

3:25:02

reflects the the cash flow. It's not all

3:25:05

going to happen in in in 2025.

3:25:08

And I think what this means then, and

3:25:11

this comes back to budgeting uh for next

3:25:14

year's budget,

3:25:16

it's important,

3:25:18

more important than ever now, to really

3:25:21

to focus on what the city's normal

3:25:24

recurring revenue is. uh when you think

3:25:27

about all the all all the regular stuff

3:25:30

so to speak and you back out all the

3:25:32

extraordinary items whether it's uh you

3:25:35

know interest income that's so

3:25:36

significant from the grants fund,

3:25:38

insurance money, um anything that's not

3:25:42

the norm and you use that as a as a

3:25:45

guide or a base to build your budget.

3:25:47

Well, now our budget has to be built

3:25:49

upon built upon what is going to be

3:25:51

anticipated next year for this

3:25:53

particular project. It's not an add-on.

3:25:56

It's it becomes a it becomes a a heart

3:25:58

piece of of the city's proposed budget

3:26:01

for next year. So, I think those are

3:26:04

guide rails to manage our way through

3:26:07

this and in in dealing with uh our

3:26:10

revenues uh you know the timeline of

3:26:13

this project which again is is 18 months

3:26:16

roughly. Um, and then also to uh uh

3:26:19

build a budget that's that reflects what

3:26:23

what this extraordinary uh event

3:26:25

represents. And I'll I'll stop right

3:26:28

there if Dave wants to comment.

3:26:30

>> Just just again um I understand all of

3:26:32

that. It's not a bulk of money going out

3:26:34

the window in one swoop. I I I get that.

3:26:38

It's just the concern of it when it's

3:26:40

coming back. Um my question to Mr.

3:26:43

Grover would be um there was a there was

3:26:47

a time where the the insurance lapsed at

3:26:50

the Broad Street Market,

3:26:52

>> not the city's insurance, the

3:26:53

association's assurance was lapsed at

3:26:55

the time of the fire.

3:26:56

>> Okay. How does that

3:26:57

>> insurance was always there?

3:26:59

>> How would that affect insurance revenue?

3:27:01

I mean money coming back.

3:27:02

>> There is no revenue anticipated from the

3:27:04

policy that lapsed. There is no

3:27:06

insurance from that policy that the

3:27:08

association had. All the cities, the

3:27:10

city has a bundled at the time, building

3:27:12

insurance, which is if you're hear like

3:27:14

a fleet policy for vehicles, we had that

3:27:16

for buildings. So they took the

3:27:18

valuation of every structure we had,

3:27:20

came to a number way back when, and said

3:27:23

that is your coverage. Now, you still

3:27:25

have to qualify, but there's so there's

3:27:27

plenty of coverage, right? Plenty of

3:27:30

coverage. It's it's got to qualify as

3:27:32

bringing the building back to its

3:27:34

condition at the time of the fire.

3:27:36

>> Yeah. So

3:27:36

>> before you before you go far on because

3:27:39

uh you I don't want you to get away from

3:27:41

what I'm what I'm asking.

3:27:42

>> I got you. No, just

3:27:44

>> um so even though that's being said, we

3:27:47

still have we don't know what we're

3:27:49

going to receive back.

3:27:50

>> So a good faith estimate of what the

3:27:53

additional monies will get back and

3:27:55

again this is

3:27:57

I would I would suggest this is in favor

3:27:59

of the insurance company as the city is

3:28:01

6.5 to7 million. the business side is

3:28:04

that we think a whole lot more of this

3:28:06

work qualifies under the terms of that

3:28:09

policy. So, and that's where the

3:28:12

argument is going to be. After you get

3:28:13

to about $6.5 million, the rest of the

3:28:16

coverage we get back is going to be and

3:28:19

that's why we had brought in people at

3:28:20

the beginning to go through this with us

3:28:23

to show that it qualifies under the subp

3:28:25

parts of the policy. So, that we

3:28:28

anticipate I think at a minimum six and

3:28:30

a half coming back. We're pushing for a

3:28:32

whole lot more coming back, but there's

3:28:34

no guarantee.

3:28:35

>> And that's that's where I'm I'm I'm I'm

3:28:38

uncomfortable because we don't we don't

3:28:40

know where that's if if that's going to

3:28:43

happen being that even when some of

3:28:45

these no longer American Rescue Plan

3:28:47

funds are spent. Um the budget's going

3:28:51

to drop. Our budget's going to drop down

3:28:54

from where it's at right now. And and

3:28:56

what what monies do we have coming in

3:28:58

that can help fill some of these things?

3:29:00

Again I just want to again I don't want

3:29:02

to

3:29:02

>> may I just interpret put the context to

3:29:05

that I think the questions then become

3:29:07

what historically for the last say five

3:29:09

years is our average fund balance after

3:29:12

the budget after the budget is there

3:29:14

when we project revenues what's left how

3:29:17

much of that is being taken here and

3:29:19

then what is the projection for the fund

3:29:20

balance at the end of 2025 the end of

3:29:24

2026 the end of 2027 because that's

3:29:26

really what's going to tell you it's

3:29:27

nothing's going to take away the budget

3:29:29

what it's going to take away is the

3:29:31

security blanket or part of it. Right?

3:29:33

That is the number. But I think finance

3:29:35

can answer what their estimate is. How

3:29:38

much is that hit? And and that's the

3:29:41

question, right? And it doesn't mean

3:29:43

that's my concern.

3:29:43

>> It doesn't mean you're not pursuing

3:29:45

other revenue sources during that

3:29:47

period. But I mean that is the context I

3:29:49

think you see it in. How much is the

3:29:51

fund balance going from where it is

3:29:53

projected historically to where will it

3:29:55

be three years from now based on this

3:29:57

expenditure? And I I can't answer that

3:29:59

question. I think that's a business

3:30:00

office, a finance office question,

3:30:02

budget question.

3:30:03

>> And and again, I'm just stating where

3:30:04

where I am with this. And I don't want,

3:30:06

you know, anyone to take this the wrong

3:30:08

way, but this is just where I am. Um I'm

3:30:11

I'm really concerned about this amount

3:30:13

of money uh being moved around. Um but

3:30:16

the reason why I'm going to vote yes,

3:30:18

because we can no longer delay this

3:30:20

because these costs keep rising. I see

3:30:22

we already jumped from 14, 20 to 23. and

3:30:26

the longer we wait. Um, but I just

3:30:28

wanted to have that on record from for

3:30:30

from my stance and um, again, thank you

3:30:32

guys for what you do. Um, but that's

3:30:34

where I stand. Thank you.

3:30:38

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones. Um, I don't

3:30:41

have any further questions. I will say

3:30:43

that I think this this can't be the end

3:30:45

of a conversation, right? Um, as we're

3:30:48

planning our budget for 2026 and 2027,

3:30:51

as we're looking at end of the year

3:30:52

expenses, these are all conversations

3:30:54

that we need to have. um and look at our

3:30:56

funds and make for sure that

3:30:59

as we're looking at positions being

3:31:02

filled and as we're looking at projects

3:31:04

to to come into the next couple of

3:31:06

years. Um I know we had a a capital

3:31:08

project and a planning process uh

3:31:11

through the finance office. Those are

3:31:13

all things that we need to look at so

3:31:14

that we can properly and efficiently

3:31:17

plan for the city's needs in the future

3:31:20

um and how this grocery market project

3:31:22

affects it and impacts it. Um, so I

3:31:24

don't think this can be the end of a

3:31:25

conversation if it would pass tonight.

3:31:27

Obviously, um, it's something that we

3:31:29

have to continue to talk about and

3:31:30

continue to plan for. Uh, I think it's a

3:31:32

reason why we need to have someone on

3:31:34

the hill advocating for the city and

3:31:35

trying to bring more funds in. Uh, we

3:31:37

can't forget about that conversation.

3:31:39

Uh, we can't forget about the the

3:31:41

support that was pledged by everyone

3:31:44

when the fire happened. Everybody had a

3:31:46

press conference in front of the

3:31:47

building. Um, and so maybe it's time to

3:31:49

start putting that pressure on and say,

3:31:50

"Okay, well, the bill's due." um you

3:31:53

know who's going to step up and actually

3:31:54

cut the check. Um it's also reaching out

3:31:56

to the different resources that we have

3:31:59

um the different grant opportunities

3:32:00

just every aspect that we can. Um

3:32:03

although we might have the money quote

3:32:05

unquote in the bank to cover it. Uh we

3:32:07

can't just rely on that either. We we

3:32:09

can't just say okay well the checks been

3:32:11

cut we have enough to cover it. It's

3:32:13

easier for us to do that than to look

3:32:14

for other revenue sources. So we have to

3:32:16

keep having this conversation and keep

3:32:17

moving forward. Um so that's just my

3:32:19

opinion on the finance side. Um, I know

3:32:21

we'll be continuing the conversation

3:32:23

around this time. Uh, every year we kind

3:32:26

of start looking at how much have we

3:32:27

underspent our budget. Um, and what we

3:32:31

what can we do with th those extra

3:32:33

funds? Uh, we paid off the debt in the

3:32:35

past years. We were able to to put a

3:32:36

large sum on that so that we didn't

3:32:38

carry that into another calendar year.

3:32:40

So, um, as we're coming to the end of

3:32:42

year, I think that's what uh what

3:32:43

solicitor Grover was kind of getting to.

3:32:45

As we're coming to that point, we have

3:32:46

to look at how much we have underspent

3:32:48

our budget this year so that we'll be

3:32:50

able to to kind of put that on this as

3:32:52

well and balance that out so that it's

3:32:53

not just such a negative hit to the 19

3:32:57

million that we have right now in our

3:32:59

our fund balance. So, I think those are

3:33:00

all things that we have to to think

3:33:02

about uh as we're at that point. So,

3:33:05

>> right. Um,

3:33:07

can I comment or do you want do you want

3:33:09

uh Councilwoman Davis, do you want to uh

3:33:12

go with your questions?

3:33:15

Okay. Ju I mean ju just a couple of

3:33:17

things. Um and and I'm not I'm not the

3:33:21

budget manager. All right. Okay. But you

3:33:25

know we're talking about revenue

3:33:27

potential and and revenue sources. And

3:33:30

when you look at our actual activity

3:33:32

thus far this year, there are some lines

3:33:35

that are doing very well compared to

3:33:38

budget. um

3:33:41

when you when you think about our the

3:33:43

the the EIT revenue our our transfer tax

3:33:46

revenue you know is outperforming so in

3:33:50

some respects somebody would might say

3:33:52

well why don't you you're doing so much

3:33:54

better in in those revenue lines why not

3:33:56

increase the budget in those lines

3:33:59

>> excuse me m you said the EIT are you

3:34:02

talking about that along with the LST

3:34:05

and 47

3:34:07

that's that we're using in act 47 that

3:34:09

those are double numbers. I'm just

3:34:11

asking for that EIT number.

3:34:12

>> Yeah. Yeah. Um I I I can't give you a

3:34:15

number, but I'm talking Yeah. EIT our

3:34:17

our tax revenue uh transfer tax revenue

3:34:20

which is real estate uh related. I'm

3:34:24

just looking at like budget to actual on

3:34:25

some of our revenue lines. So the the

3:34:28

temptation might be well let's increase

3:34:30

those lines to match what the actuals

3:34:32

are and then you can use that increase

3:34:35

to go up on the on on the board here to

3:34:38

help fund Broad Street Market. And to me

3:34:40

I I would hesitate to go there because

3:34:42

there are other revenue lines in the

3:34:44

general fund which are not as strong. So

3:34:48

it it's one of those things where you

3:34:50

know you do have the the revenue it's a

3:34:53

mixture. you have some lines that are

3:34:54

doing quite well, some others that are

3:34:56

not doing as well. So that's why I I

3:34:59

would hesitate to to to focus on any two

3:35:02

or three or four lines to help solve

3:35:04

this as far as coming up with other

3:35:06

revenue sources. That's, you know, we we

3:35:08

were looking at that, but we did not

3:35:10

want to go there. Um,

3:35:11

>> and when I meant other revenue sources,

3:35:13

I meant outside revenue sources.

3:35:15

>> Sure. Sure.

3:35:16

>> Not our money.

3:35:17

>> Right. Um and then the the the last

3:35:19

thing I want to mention too and uh it it

3:35:23

comes back to timing again and and and

3:35:26

you know not having to realize this full

3:35:28

outlay of cash by by the end of the year

3:35:30

which will not happen. But what's really

3:35:33

happening here with the the heavier

3:35:36

construction cost having to uh

3:35:38

materialize with the contractors

3:35:41

the contracts have to be solidified and

3:35:43

and approved. And to do that, to go

3:35:46

through uh the purchasing system and

3:35:49

have uh full approval by by everyone,

3:35:53

namely the the mayor, legal, and the

3:35:56

controller, there needs to be budget in

3:35:59

the system on the books. Uh so the when

3:36:02

the incumbrances go when when the

3:36:04

commitments go out to the books looking

3:36:06

for budget, there's going to be budget

3:36:07

available. uh even though it's not a

3:36:09

it's not a spend. If if for example, if

3:36:12

you have a million-doll project and you

3:36:15

know come the end of the year you've

3:36:16

spent $400,000 in cash, you still had to

3:36:19

budget 1 million uh to to get it on the

3:36:22

books and then the 600,000 then becomes

3:36:26

uh a uh an item for next year's budget

3:36:31

because it's going to roll forward into

3:36:33

the following year.

3:36:35

just to to to explain that. Um, but that

3:36:39

that's those are the only two additional

3:36:41

items I wanted to to comment on.

3:36:46

>> Councilwoman Davis, any questions?

3:36:48

>> Thank you, Vice President Green.

3:36:51

I don't have any questions, but I want

3:36:55

to agree with you, Mr.

3:37:00

McCutchenson

3:37:02

and also solicitor Grover that

3:37:05

everybody's speaking a different

3:37:07

language and it would be nice if we

3:37:11

could see that language you know with

3:37:14

every you have an accountant's mind you

3:37:17

know exactly what's going on where money

3:37:19

went where it came from you can see that

3:37:23

Mr. from a country in your brain, but we

3:37:27

can't see that. I can't see that. The

3:37:29

public can't see that and it's very hard

3:37:32

to follow. Um, I have confidence in you

3:37:38

that it's real, but

3:37:41

it would make it easier if we could

3:37:43

actually see all the details that you

3:37:46

just went through. If we could see it,

3:37:50

it would make it easier to understand.

3:37:53

And I just don't understand why we can't

3:37:56

have something that we could see

3:38:00

and understand, if that makes sense.

3:38:02

It's getting late, but thank you. That's

3:38:06

it for me.

3:38:08

Thank you very much. Um, I'm going to

3:38:11

turn it over to Mr. Baker. uh if you

3:38:14

would have anything you'd like to to add

3:38:16

as especially as far as the timeline um

3:38:20

and the schedule that you sent us.

3:38:26

>> Good evening, council. Um really the

3:38:29

only thing that I have to add is uh you

3:38:32

know what we've kind of touched base on

3:38:34

previously. Uh, as was stated earlier,

3:38:37

uh, this timeline is aggressive. Uh, it

3:38:40

is achievable, but it is dependent on

3:38:43

funding. As Brian explained, if we don't

3:38:46

have the funds in the coffers, we do not

3:38:48

have the ability to sign the contracts

3:38:50

to move forward. Um, unfortunately,

3:38:52

these contracts are kind of tied to each

3:38:54

other. We did separate into 11 different

3:38:57

packages, uh, trying to give opportunity

3:38:59

to as many businesses as possible. But

3:39:02

since we did that, there are 11

3:39:04

different entities that have to work

3:39:06

together uh to achieve the same goal.

3:39:08

So, uh that being said, um it's kind of

3:39:12

crucial if if we're going to meet this

3:39:15

timeline that we do move forward in in

3:39:17

an expedited manner. um if we can't uh

3:39:21

move forward with our site contract, our

3:39:23

main contractor, our masonry contractor,

3:39:25

you name it, uh we're not going to be

3:39:27

able to kind of get past a certain point

3:39:29

and and it's a pretty early stage. Uh so

3:39:32

that's that's kind of the the crucial

3:39:34

part on my side for council to to know

3:39:36

and understand uh that a fully funded

3:39:39

project is important for us to um stay

3:39:42

anywhere close to staying on the

3:39:44

schedule. and weather does play a factor

3:39:46

in our construction as well since we do

3:39:48

have a building without an envelope

3:39:50

sealed without a roof in certain areas.

3:39:53

We have started demolition work. Um

3:39:55

there's there's been a lot of uh a lot

3:39:58

of positive input uh from everyone that

3:40:00

that we've seen around the area. Um but

3:40:03

you know, it's important that we keep

3:40:04

that going if if uh possible. So that's

3:40:08

that's about all I have to say as far as

3:40:09

comments go unless you have any

3:40:11

additional questions for me.

3:40:13

All right. Thank you. I don't have any

3:40:15

questions at the moment. Councilwoman

3:40:17

Davis, any questions for Mr. Baker?

3:40:20

>> No questions.

3:40:22

>> President Hill. Yes, I have a few

3:40:24

questions. First, I want to make sure

3:40:26

that this is the updated

3:40:30

schedule because we were sent one at

3:40:34

12:44 p.m. today and then we received

3:40:38

one at 3:28 p.m. So, I just wanted to

3:40:41

make sure that this was the updated

3:40:43

schedule. The consultant made a minor

3:40:46

error on the first one that was sent.

3:40:49

>> Yes. So, this should be the most

3:40:51

up-to-date schedule. Um I do believe

3:40:53

that they had to you know this is a a

3:40:55

moving target so they are updating the

3:40:57

schedule sometimes weekly just to keep

3:41:00

it accurate.

3:41:01

>> Okay.

3:41:02

Um now you you mentioned you have to

3:41:05

sign contracts or you have to have the

3:41:07

money in the coffers but you've already

3:41:09

started signing contracts. Is that

3:41:11

correct?

3:41:12

>> We do have some of the minor contracts

3:41:14

that we have the existing funds for

3:41:16

signed and they are started but uh that

3:41:19

being said we have the demo contract

3:41:20

signed. So, we have a demolition

3:41:22

contractor out there, but the um like

3:41:25

the site contractor, they have the uh

3:41:28

wall shoring in their package. So, the

3:41:31

demolition contractor can only go so far

3:41:33

before the walls become unstable and

3:41:34

they need to be shored up by the site

3:41:36

contractor. So, again, that's just one

3:41:39

of many, many different um kind of

3:41:42

examples on how these individual

3:41:44

packages are all working in tandem with

3:41:46

each other to keep the project moving

3:41:48

forward.

3:41:49

>> Okay. Okay. And then I have one other

3:41:51

question. I'm not sure if you can answer

3:41:53

it or somebody else can. This was a text

3:41:56

message that I received from a resident

3:41:58

on Friday at 6:12 p.m. Just saw on the

3:42:02

news 14.4 million plus then 19 million

3:42:06

is in parenthesis for the Broad Street

3:42:09

market. The disparity study hasn't been

3:42:11

ratified and there is no percentage in

3:42:13

the RFPs for diverse businesses. This

3:42:17

may never come again. I asked about the

3:42:21

percentage at the pre-bid and there they

3:42:24

said there is none. So I just wanted to

3:42:27

clarify is that accurate that there are

3:42:30

there's no percentage

3:42:32

um in the RFPs for diverse businesses.

3:42:36

>> There is not allowed to be a legally

3:42:39

mandated one there. We and frankly I

3:42:42

went to one of the meetings at the

3:42:43

request to the mayor to emphasize the

3:42:45

need for having participation in local

3:42:49

workers pretty vigorously. Uh that

3:42:53

that's an issue for the council and the

3:42:55

mayor and got we understand that

3:42:57

completely from the entities that we

3:43:00

were talking to at the time. But no, we

3:43:02

can't mandate it and we can't mandate it

3:43:04

without an approved ordinance that does

3:43:06

it because the last ordinance plainly um

3:43:10

fell apart under the court rulings that

3:43:13

existed regarding the language that we

3:43:14

had. It wasn't our case, but it was our

3:43:16

languagevious. We hadvious obviously

3:43:18

borrowed it from someone else and a

3:43:20

court threw it all out. Um, frankly, in

3:43:23

the atmosphere we're in right now

3:43:24

nationally, it's getting harder and

3:43:26

harder to adopt. I mean, that is the

3:43:29

simple reality and Harrisburg does it.

3:43:30

They're going to be ahead of it and in

3:43:32

the fight. So, but mandating it

3:43:35

incredibly difficult as a legal.

3:43:39

>> Well, I'd rather be ahead of it and in a

3:43:41

fight than just uh businesses missing

3:43:46

out on this once in a-lifetime

3:43:48

opportunity. I think that it's it's

3:43:50

unfortunate because it's something that

3:43:52

this council, as you noted, um

3:43:57

well, we were blamed for holding

3:43:59

everything up because of it. But I think

3:44:01

that it's unfortunate that our um

3:44:04

Harrisburg based uh minority and

3:44:08

womenowned businesses won't have a seat

3:44:11

at this table and I think that's that's

3:44:13

it's just unfortunate. So, thank you for

3:44:16

your response to the constituent. I they

3:44:19

were supposed to come. I hope that

3:44:20

they're listening so they could hear

3:44:22

you. Um I don't have any other

3:44:24

questions.

3:44:27

>> Thank you, Councilwoman Ross.

3:44:29

Councilwoman

3:44:42

Ross, any questions or comments?

3:44:50

>> We'll move on to Councilman Rodriguez.

3:44:52

Any questions or comments?

3:44:54

>> Thank you, Madam Vice President. Um, my

3:44:56

question was answered in somewhat

3:44:58

format. I just wanted to know how the

3:45:01

appropriations went for the people that

3:45:02

are actually on the job now. I saw

3:45:04

reports that work has already begun, but

3:45:07

uh, Director Baker just alluded to that.

3:45:09

So, that's all I have. Thank you.

3:45:12

>> Thank you, Councilman Jones.

3:45:14

>> No questions.

3:45:15

>> Thank you. And once again, Councilwoman

3:45:17

Ross.

3:45:20

Seeing none, uh, are there any other

3:45:23

questions?

3:45:26

All right. Um, I don't have any

3:45:27

questions at the moment. Thank you very

3:45:29

much, Mr. Baker and Mr. McCutchen for

3:45:32

being here tonight. Thank you for

3:45:34

hanging in there with us. It's um,

3:45:36

getting later, but uh, this was an

3:45:38

important discussion for us to have.

3:45:39

>> I have one more question. Yes,

3:45:41

>> Mr. Trudeelle, are you able to pull up

3:45:43

the renderings that were shared?

3:45:49

>> Okay. Is he allowed to share them?

3:45:52

>> Okay.

3:45:57

Okay. I just wanted to make sure if he's

3:46:00

able to. I don't know.

3:46:06

>> They look a lot like the uh existing

3:46:08

building, so they don't come up.

3:46:10

>> They do.

3:46:24

There we go.

3:46:28

Would anybody like to walk through or

3:46:29

we're just going to share each slide?

3:46:32

Any discussion or commentary?

3:46:36

Okay. Well, Central Plaza, Central Plaza

3:46:40

renderings. This is what

3:46:52

And so with the central plaza, um you

3:46:55

can note that it it looks similar to how

3:46:56

it does now. Uh but that entire area

3:46:59

will have to be uh I'd say taxfully

3:47:03

worked on underneath because it will be

3:47:04

infrastructure that's going to be run.

3:47:07

Uh new gas lines, new electric lines,

3:47:09

higher voltages, uh new sewer lines,

3:47:11

centralized grease trap. Uh this would

3:47:14

be the um the east end plaza area. This

3:47:19

we we'd propose to have uh somewhat of a

3:47:21

rain garden uh raised area there uh with

3:47:26

maybe like a small amphitheater uh type

3:47:28

seating area back there and an eating

3:47:30

area. Um we did uh pay a lot of

3:47:33

attention to the the needs and you know

3:47:36

the fact that there's a school right

3:47:37

next to uh to that area. So we didn't

3:47:40

want to put the seating too close to the

3:47:42

roads. We wanted to keep line of sight

3:47:43

up. Uh we wanted to also give uh people,

3:47:46

you know, the ability to use that for

3:47:48

multi-use, whether it be for events or,

3:47:51

you know, evening movies, you name it.

3:47:54

Um we're going to keep all the clear

3:47:55

story windows. Uh everything you see

3:47:57

from the outside now will be uh very

3:48:00

similar, if not exactly the same, but it

3:48:02

will be up to date to to more modern

3:48:04

standards uh with much more rigidity and

3:48:07

strength throughout the structure

3:48:08

itself. And for the seating options on

3:48:11

slide 10, the last slide, there's option

3:48:13

A uh with a monolithic

3:48:17

stone seating or option B, a metal bench

3:48:20

seating. How will that be determined?

3:48:24

>> Uh I do believe that um the mayor has

3:48:28

determined the uh bench seating. We also

3:48:30

had some um different architects that

3:48:33

weighed in on that on the benefits of

3:48:35

the bench compared to the monolithic

3:48:37

stone. uh just as far as cleanliness,

3:48:40

upkeep, and um you know, the comfort. Uh

3:48:44

those stones are also kind of like a

3:48:46

placeholder for an option for seating.

3:48:48

They weren't a a specific, you know,

3:48:50

this is exactly what we're going to put

3:48:51

here. It's more of a they were showing

3:48:53

an option of a possibility.

3:48:56

>> Okay.

3:48:58

I like the bench, but thanks. Thank you,

3:49:01

Mr. Trudeale.

3:49:04

>> Thank you very much. Any other questions

3:49:06

or comments for um the administration?

3:49:12

Seeing none, uh

3:49:14

>> um I'm sorry. I don't know if you all

3:49:16

can hear me.

3:49:18

>> We can hear you now. Yes.

3:49:20

>> Okay. I I do apologize. Um even though

3:49:23

after all these years, Zoom is just not

3:49:26

what it needs to be. But um I just I

3:49:29

just wanted to make a comment. I I can I

3:49:31

was able to hear everything that was um

3:49:34

being said. Um I think my biggest

3:49:37

concern the market is very important to

3:49:40

us to our community and I know how

3:49:42

important it is for us to rebuild it and

3:49:45

um it's a staple. I want it done right

3:49:48

and I think we all do. I think my

3:49:50

biggest concern is the part of taking

3:49:53

the $412,000

3:49:55

out of the um federal general or the

3:49:59

federal fund and correct me if I'm wrong

3:50:01

in any of this which was placed in there

3:50:04

because we didn't use all of the ARPA

3:50:07

funds but the ARPA funds came into play

3:50:10

from COVID which was to help rebuild

3:50:12

communities. Um, yes, I do understand

3:50:15

that we're trying to rebuild the market,

3:50:17

but I feel like that money was essential

3:50:20

to just

3:50:22

>> doing things in the community that we

3:50:24

weren't able to do. Maybe it was better

3:50:26

lighting. Maybe it was creating even

3:50:28

more housing for market value housing as

3:50:32

well and bringing back a baseball league

3:50:34

to the city. Just just things that were

3:50:36

vital that we probably couldn't do. And

3:50:38

I'm afraid of taking my biggest concern

3:50:41

is taking that money out. Yes, we can

3:50:43

say this is the only time, but will it

3:50:45

really be to the point where there's

3:50:48

nothing left to actually do what it was

3:50:51

meant to do? And that is my biggest

3:50:53

concern. It's very hard to vote on this

3:50:55

tonight, even with all the information

3:50:57

that's being given because of that just

3:51:00

um nervousness for me, for the

3:51:03

residents. That's their biggest concern.

3:51:04

That's a lot of things I heard from

3:51:06

residents. So, I just wanted um to say

3:51:09

that I wanted to voice that concern. I

3:51:11

wanted to say I it's very hard to vote

3:51:13

on this tonight. I'm I'm worried. Um but

3:51:17

I just um I don't know that that's my

3:51:20

biggest concern with the money coming

3:51:21

out of that fund knowing what that money

3:51:24

was essentially supposed to be used for.

3:51:26

>> May I miss Madam President?

3:51:29

>> Sure.

3:51:29

>> So, so that money was not ARPA money.

3:51:31

That is CDBG programming money. As you

3:51:34

know, sometimes it takes five to six

3:51:36

years that we have open programming

3:51:38

money from CDBG block grants. So that

3:51:40

was a million dollars that was still

3:51:42

there in programming money that was made

3:51:44

available for this where we have

3:51:46

deadlines every and sometime it's three

3:51:49

years, sometimes it's five years to get

3:51:50

it spent. So that is the pot that is

3:51:53

attributable to. It's not it's not the

3:51:55

ARP of funds.

3:51:58

is where we're allowed to infrastructure

3:52:00

that I mean and maybe they they it was

3:52:03

said today and I didn't hear it but last

3:52:05

week that's what I'm almost certain was

3:52:08

mentioned

3:52:10

>> so I'm confused on when it changed if I

3:52:12

missed a conversation I felt like I

3:52:14

heard everything tonight but I'm almost

3:52:16

certain that was what was said last week

3:52:18

>> and it's directly referenced as CDBG

3:52:20

funds in the actual reallocation

3:52:23

schedule

3:52:24

>> I think councilwoman RS is talking about

3:52:26

the federal grants fund

3:52:28

That was the interest that we have

3:52:32

materialized from the um so it's it's

3:52:35

not actual money that was um allocated

3:52:39

for programming in the ARPA not ARPA

3:52:41

funds um it is interest that has acrewed

3:52:45

over time from the funds sitting unused

3:52:48

in our bank accounts.

3:52:51

>> Okay. Thank you.

3:52:53

Any

3:52:55

other comments or questions?

3:52:59

Seeing none, I make a Do I make the

3:53:01

motion? You make the motion to go back

3:53:02

into session. I make a motion to go back

3:53:06

into session.

3:53:07

>> So move.

3:53:08

>> Thank you. Uh we will now resume our

3:53:11

special legislative session. We have

3:53:14

before us resolution 63 of 20125. Mr.

3:53:18

Trudeell, could you please read it into

3:53:20

the record one last time? Resolution 63,

3:53:23

2025, a resolution approving the six

3:53:26

proposed 2025 budget reallocation

3:53:28

related to the rebuild of the Broad

3:53:30

Street Market brick building.

3:53:32

>> Thank you, council members. Are there

3:53:34

any final questions, comments, or

3:53:36

concerns

3:53:38

related to resolution 65 of 2025?

3:53:43

>> Um, I will just make the the comment of

3:53:46

this has been a long process. Um, it's

3:53:50

been a couple of years since the fire at

3:53:52

the Broad Street Market. Uh, it seems

3:53:54

like it's been several conversations.

3:53:56

Um, I will say I don't like the fact

3:53:59

that every time it comes down, it's

3:54:01

rushed. You know, it's kind of like we

3:54:03

need the money now. We need the money

3:54:05

now or everything's going to stop. And

3:54:06

if city council doesn't pass it today,

3:54:08

the work doesn't get done tomorrow. And

3:54:11

then the conversation always comes back

3:54:13

from the residents or to the residents

3:54:16

um being told that well the market would

3:54:18

have been done if city council had voted

3:54:20

on it sooner. If the information had

3:54:22

been gotten to us sooner then we could

3:54:23

have voted on it sooner or we could have

3:54:24

had more information. The fact that

3:54:26

there are

3:54:29

six people here from the public, I'm not

3:54:32

including the media, six people here or

3:54:34

so from the public. Um, as much outcries

3:54:37

as we've seen uh regarding the broad

3:54:40

street market at the the different

3:54:42

meetings, at the different uh

3:54:44

conversations we've had, I think that

3:54:46

alone shows um how rushed this feels. Um

3:54:50

and how discouraged uh a lot of

3:54:52

residents are feeling about the Broad

3:54:53

Street Market project to to begin with.

3:54:56

Um it was all over the news a lot today.

3:54:58

I I've got lots of calls and and texts

3:55:00

saying what's going on with the Broad

3:55:02

Street Market. I was out with my nephew

3:55:04

this weekend and someone came and said,

3:55:06

"I heard you guys aren't even building

3:55:07

the Broad Street market." Um, because

3:55:09

it's just been so much delay in what's

3:55:12

going on. Obviously, I had the

3:55:14

conversation and corrected them on that,

3:55:15

but I think it just kind of goes to see

3:55:17

how the residents are starting to feel

3:55:18

discouraged in this project itself. Um,

3:55:21

I think lack of clear communication

3:55:23

plays a role in it as well. I think

3:55:25

there should be more public update

3:55:26

meetings just saying this is what's

3:55:28

going on, this is the timeline we're

3:55:30

looking at. It doesn't have to be that

3:55:32

everything's perfect, but it kind of

3:55:33

seems like it's hidden. Um, and then

3:55:36

people start questioning, well then

3:55:38

where's the money going? Why is it all

3:55:39

of a sudden are we looking at $19

3:55:40

million when I've heard nothing for the

3:55:42

past six months and now it's like we

3:55:44

need all this money. Um, and

3:55:47

I will say that council kind of feels I

3:55:49

I I won't say council, I'll say I feel

3:55:51

that way as well. Um, that, you know, we

3:55:53

shouldn't have to keep constantly coming

3:55:54

back saying, "Can we get an update? Can

3:55:57

we get information?

3:55:59

Can we get a presentation? You're asking

3:56:01

for the money. Can you give us more of a

3:56:03

breakdown of what the money is going to

3:56:04

be used for? Um, I kind of felt like

3:56:07

last week I shouldn't have had to ask,

3:56:08

can we get more of a breakdown? Can we

3:56:10

get some images? Can we get a

3:56:11

presentation? Felt like that should have

3:56:13

just automatically come because if you

3:56:14

thought we were just going to rubber

3:56:15

stamp $19 million, you've got the wrong

3:56:18

council. Um, so I would like to say just

3:56:22

as this process moves forward one way or

3:56:24

the other, we need more communication

3:56:26

with council and with the public on

3:56:28

what's going on in every aspect of the

3:56:29

city. Um, especially this Broad Street

3:56:31

Market project. Uh, because there's

3:56:33

there's always lots of conversation when

3:56:35

it's time for the money to come forth.

3:56:37

But then after after the budget's

3:56:39

passed, everyone gets quiet and it's

3:56:41

kind of like it's the administration's

3:56:43

decision and we don't have to talk to

3:56:44

you about it. But when it's time for the

3:56:47

money, it's like, okay, well, this is up

3:56:49

to council and if you don't pass it,

3:56:50

then it all fails and it's all your

3:56:51

fault and the residents can blame you

3:56:53

and that just doesn't feel fair. Um, and

3:56:55

it doesn't seem genuine when it comes

3:56:57

down that way. Understand um that there

3:57:00

are lots of moving parts. Uh but I also

3:57:02

understand that we're paying a a hefty

3:57:04

price to a construction manager. They

3:57:08

have time to show up and give us a

3:57:09

presentation just the same. Um and so

3:57:12

you might have other things going on. I

3:57:14

understand. Uh, Director Baker, you have

3:57:16

other parts of your job. Uh, but we

3:57:18

hired a construction manager because we

3:57:20

knew you wouldn't have the time along

3:57:22

with everything else on your plate to

3:57:24

handle this project alone. Uh, it's a

3:57:26

huge lift and it's the reason why we

3:57:30

thought we got all the resources we

3:57:31

needed to make the decisions we needed.

3:57:33

But yet and still, it comes down to the

3:57:35

day before a special legislative

3:57:37

session. If you don't pass this, the

3:57:39

bills don't get paid. Um, and it makes

3:57:42

me want to vote against it because it

3:57:44

feels rushed, but I wouldn't punish the

3:57:46

residents of Harrisburg for the lack of

3:57:49

transparency and conversation uh, from

3:57:51

the administration side as far as this

3:57:53

project. So, I will be voting in support

3:57:55

of it because it's what needs to be

3:57:57

done, but I don't feel

3:58:01

happy about it in the process of how

3:58:03

it's been done. So, that's my

3:58:05

long-winded comment.

3:58:07

>> No, that's fine. Are there any

3:58:08

additional comments?

3:58:10

I have one.

3:58:13

As usual with this administration, we

3:58:16

continue to receive information at the

3:58:18

24th hour, forcing city council to vote

3:58:22

immediately on a resolution.

3:58:25

Just today, today, Tuesday, September

3:58:28

30th, 2025, council members received

3:58:32

four emails regarding the Broad Street

3:58:34

Market. The first at 11:08 a.m. It was a

3:58:38

summary of the project costs including

3:58:41

upcoming estimated construction.

3:58:44

The second 12:44 p.m. Broad Street

3:58:48

Market brick building restoration

3:58:50

schedule.

3:58:52

3:28 p.m. updated Broad Street Market

3:58:55

brick building restoration schedule.

3:58:58

That's the one where the consultant made

3:58:59

a minor error to the schedule. and then

3:59:03

one at five o'clock from Mr. Trudale

3:59:06

which included again the restoration

3:59:08

schedule which I'm not sure if it was

3:59:10

the first one or the second one and then

3:59:13

the renderings that you just saw that

3:59:15

were dated July 7th of 2025.

3:59:20

It's not fair to us to constantly

3:59:24

receive everything at the last minute.

3:59:27

We have full-time jobs and other

3:59:30

responsibilities. I can't even check my

3:59:32

email on my phone if I wanted to. I have

3:59:34

to physically be seated in front of this

3:59:37

computer to check the email. So, do you

3:59:39

know when I saw them, I was having

3:59:41

difficulty getting on the internet here,

3:59:44

and I didn't I couldn't open it until

3:59:46

5:38 p.m. So, it's just a lot of

3:59:49

information to digest at the last

3:59:51

minute. And it seems to be a recurring

3:59:53

theme with this administration, and it's

3:59:55

not fair to us. It's not fair to us to

4:00:01

really be forced to make a decision. You

4:00:03

heard tonight there's a whole bunch of

4:00:05

angst in this room right now amongst

4:00:07

council members and we're the ones that

4:00:09

have to vote. We have to support this

4:00:12

because if not,

4:00:16

it's going to cost us more. The

4:00:18

residents are going to be upset. The

4:00:19

market will not be restored to its full

4:00:22

glory. And it's just not fair. Um, if

4:00:26

I'm being completely honest, I really

4:00:28

wanted to delay this vote a whole

4:00:30

another week to ensure that we had

4:00:32

enough time to go through all of this.

4:00:34

This, do you see this? It looks like a

4:00:36

maze. Highlights in blue, then there's

4:00:38

dots and dates. This is a lot to just

4:00:42

receive right now and you have to vote

4:00:45

yes. It's not fair and it's consistently

4:00:48

a problem.

4:00:53

The other issue that I wanted to address

4:00:56

was the not ARPA money that transformed

4:01:01

into general fund money. But do you know

4:01:04

what else that money was intended to be

4:01:07

used for? Workforce development

4:01:09

programs, internship programs so that we

4:01:12

can generate our own internal workforce

4:01:15

of city residents. It's a cycle, right?

4:01:20

There were other things that money was

4:01:22

intended to be used for. Instead, it's

4:01:25

all basically now being utilized for the

4:01:28

Broad Street Market. And we have to say

4:01:31

yes. Community Matters Grant Program.

4:01:34

That was the grant program for minority

4:01:38

community minorityowned and womenowned

4:01:41

businesses. A one-time

4:01:43

grant program. community connection hubs

4:01:47

to assist again with workforce

4:01:49

development, job training, skills

4:01:51

building.

4:01:54

So, it's unfortunate. I I mentioned at

4:01:58

the beginning of this special

4:01:59

legislative session that I was

4:02:02

reluctantly starting this meeting and

4:02:05

I'm very much reluctantly voting yes

4:02:09

because I have to because contracts have

4:02:12

already begun to be signed. I feel like

4:02:15

that's a little premature, but it's

4:02:17

business as usual because things have to

4:02:19

keep moving. And I do not want

4:02:20

Harrisburg City Council to be regarded

4:02:24

as the stop sign for any movement with

4:02:29

Broad Street Market.

4:02:32

So, I will be voting yes. Again, it's

4:02:34

extremely reluctantly.

4:02:36

Um, and I just don't think that it's

4:02:38

fair that this administration continues

4:02:42

to force city council's hand.

4:02:46

Mr. Trudeelle, could you please call the

4:02:48

vote?

4:02:51

>> Miss Davis,

4:02:53

>> yes.

4:02:55

>> Miss Green,

4:02:56

>> yes.

4:02:58

>> Mr. Jones,

4:02:59

>> yay.

4:03:00

>> Miss Rolls,

4:03:02

>> yes.

4:03:04

Mr. Rodriguez.

4:03:07

>> Yes.

4:03:08

>> Miss Hill.

4:03:10

>> Yes.

4:03:11

>> Resolution 63 2025 passes by vote of 6

4:03:15

to zero.

4:03:16

>> Thank you.

4:03:19

The time is 9:40 p.m. We do not have any

4:03:23

old business. We do not have any new

4:03:25

business. I will entertain a motion to

4:03:27

adjurnn.

4:03:30

>> Second. Thank you. We stand a journal.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free