Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Khalil Gibran's Children: What Every Parent Gets Wrong | The Prophet Explained

25:47EnglishTranscribed Jul 4, 2026
0:00

Essentially, it's a philosophy book.

0:01

Kahlil Gibran, he is calling himself in

0:05

this like or or he has a character in

0:07

there. It's like you know, he's calling

0:09

the prophet. One day he had to leave the

0:10

city and go

0:12

to the city and look at the philosophy

0:14

on various topics. Your children are not

0:17

your children. They are the sons and

0:20

daughters of life's longing for itself.

0:23

They come through you but not from you.

0:26

Throughout this book, I think he has

0:27

never called upon something a God or

0:30

anything like that because I think he

0:32

wanted to be more inclusive of everyone.

0:34

But you can see the usage of the like

0:37

you know, the he and the his like you

0:39

know, it's it's capital H capital H for

0:42

his capital H for he. It's presenting

0:44

like you know, that godly figure or the

0:46

divine figure or or or he's calling just

0:49

life.

0:52

No, it's it's a it's a it's an idea.

0:55

It's it's more of a what you want it to

0:58

be. In real life, does it does it

1:00

translate into a real life situations?

1:02

Like I don't know because think about

1:04

this. He says, you may give them your

1:06

love but not your thoughts. What else do

1:09

you pass out pass to your children?

1:11

Don't you pass your values? Don't you

1:12

pass your like certain infrastructure

1:15

like you know, structure to their life

1:17

that hey, this is a good thing. This is

1:19

a bad thing. For even as he loves the

1:20

arrow that flies, so he loves also the

1:22

bow that is stable.

1:25

But

1:26

actually classy value a good thing to

1:28

say

1:34

Yes.

2:03

Ooh, who's that?

2:05

That's me.

2:06

I got a

2:07

I got a nose job.

2:09

You got a mustache, too.

2:11

>> [laughter]

2:12

>> The prophet Kahlil Gibran, yes.

2:16

I

2:18

work discuss

2:20

from this very famous book that I know

2:23

you have also read and you brought this

2:25

you brought this up.

2:39

Kahlil Gibran because this is one of my

2:40

favorite books.

2:48

>> [laughter]

2:49

>> Well, they actually then your book is

2:52

even bigger

2:53

as compared to mine. Look at this. I got

2:55

a pocket size version of You got a

2:57

pocket size cuz I mean you you might

2:59

need a pocket size version

3:02

of this book

3:03

and you can like open it up for any

3:04

topic, any situation that you're in.

3:07

And it could be like a guide book. I

3:08

mean, I think that's that's the idea.

3:10

Like do you want to explain what the

3:11

premise of this book is a little bit? I

3:14

mean, yeah. It's it's a

3:18

Essentially, it's a philosophy book like

3:19

you know,

3:21

this Kahlil Gibran, he is calling

3:26

himself in this like or or he has a

3:29

character in there. It's like you know,

3:31

he's calling the prophet essentially and

3:34

the

3:43

So the city

3:44

actually

3:47

look at the philosophy

3:48

on various topics. So this book is is a

3:51

collection of 26 poems

3:54

that are

3:56

essentially on different topics of what

3:58

he thinks about those topics, right?

4:09

Right? I mean,

4:11

passion or

4:13

reason reason

4:15

philosophy. We should

4:16

cover that one as well at some point.

4:24

that we going to cover today.

4:29

to deliver his own philosophy but

4:32

through a character named I think Al

4:33

Mustafa

4:34

who is

4:36

who is

4:37

you know,

4:39

portrayed as the prophet in this

4:41

fictional in this fictional story.

4:44

It's

4:47

a company by

4:49

illustrations that the author did that

4:51

Kahlil Gibran did. I think he did about

4:54

12 illustrations and one of them

4:58

actually the one that we want to cover.

5:00

I think we'll end up covering a couple

5:01

of them. But you on children

5:10

Okay,

5:12

I think we should show it first and then

5:14

we should read it so it will make sense.

5:15

Like it it essentially opens up to the

5:17

audience, right?

5:20

I think so. Or should we should do

5:21

should we do it at the end?

5:23

I think we should do it at the end

5:24

because it's

5:26

it ends on that note. Okay. And I mean,

5:30

you know, it ends on that note and then

5:32

it makes sense. So I mean, sure. But

5:35

that's the thing, right? Like

5:37

picture the then

5:40

the master should

5:41

go.

5:45

I'm not going to explain anything there,

5:47

right? You know, just look at it.

5:48

Someone's holding a bow like you know,

5:51

to shoot an arrow. That's all I see

5:53

right now. Yeah, it's it's not like a

5:55

conventional type bow, though. Yes.

5:57

Yeah, so that's what we going to find

5:58

out in the poem itself. So let me read

6:00

that. It's it's a whimsical drawing of a

6:03

man holding a bow.

6:05

I'll just leave it at that.

6:07

All right.

6:09

So the way

6:11

the way the poem goes is essentially a

6:13

woman who is holding her

6:16

baby and she asking the prophet Al

6:19

Mustafa, speak to us of children. Yeah,

6:23

I imagined her yelling.

6:25

Yes, speak to her. Cuz cuz the prophet

6:28

is standing up there like that on the

6:30

ship and she she's she's clutching a

6:32

baby and she's like

6:35

how? Speak to us Speak to us of

6:37

children. What about the children?

6:40

I don't know. For some reason I always

6:42

imagine this Italian like I always go

6:44

like this.

6:45

>> [laughter]

6:46

>> Speak to us of children.

6:50

in my head. All right. So it says

6:53

Okay, hold on. Let me look at the camera

6:55

while I say this one.

6:59

And he said

7:01

Your children are not your children.

7:04

They are the sons and daughters of

7:07

life's long for its longing for itself.

7:11

They come through you but not from you.

7:15

And though they are with you, yet they

7:19

belong not to you.

7:22

You may give them your love but not your

7:25

thoughts. For they have their own

7:28

thoughts.

7:29

You may house their bodies but not their

7:32

souls.

7:33

For their souls dwell in the house of

7:36

tomorrow.

7:37

Which you cannot visit not even in your

7:41

dreams.

7:42

You may strive to be like them

7:45

but seek not to make them like you.

7:49

For life goes not backwards not tarries

7:52

with yesterday.

7:55

You are the bows from which your

7:58

children as living arrows are sent

8:01

forth.

8:03

The archer sees the mark upon the path

8:07

of the infinite.

8:09

And he bends you with his might and his

8:12

arrows may go swift and far.

8:16

Let your bending in the archer's hand be

8:19

for gladness.

8:20

For even as he loves the arrow that

8:23

flies

8:24

so he loves also the bow that is stable.

8:30

Wow.

8:33

For even as he loves the arrow that

8:34

flies, so he loves also the bow that is

8:36

stable.

8:37

Yeah, but that is stable.

8:50

Yes.

8:52

And and and now please bring back the

8:55

illustration that you were showing

8:56

because I feel like now it will make

8:58

more sense and and now we can even see

9:00

the bow that it actually makes made out

9:03

of like two people.

9:05

Not very clear but I think yeah, I think

9:08

it's blurry but it's essentially made

9:10

out of two people which I'm assuming men

9:12

and women at that time

9:14

when it's written. But the stability, it

9:16

comes from both joining their hands

9:19

essentially coming together

9:21

in the hands of this mighty being which

9:25

he is calling

9:27

like Al Mustafa is calling life. But if

9:29

you see life

9:31

like in the poem itself, it's capital L.

9:35

Life's longing for itself. So when when

9:38

you use capital L like that within the

9:40

middle of the sentence and like you

9:41

know, so so it throughout this book, I

9:43

think he has never called upon

9:46

something a God or anything like that

9:48

because I think he wanted to be more

9:50

inclusive of everyone. But but you can

9:52

see the the um

9:55

the the usage of the like you know the

9:58

he and the his like you know it's it's

10:01

capital H capital H for his capital H

10:04

for he it it's it's presenting like you

10:08

know that that godly figure or the

10:09

divine figure or or or he's calling just

10:12

life. Like you know like he's just

10:14

calling that life or

10:16

so I [clears throat] I think I think

10:18

this book is without

10:21

without using religion

10:24

he's communicating what mostly all

10:26

religions communicate and and and point

10:30

towards.

10:32

I don't want to give religion that much

10:33

credit.

10:35

I think

10:36

religion like you know it's it's still

10:38

vague enough.

10:40

Religion has too many

10:43

I would say this I would say this when

10:45

the religion started they were not going

10:47

to be like you know they were not trying

10:48

to be a religion they were just trying

10:50

to put out the philosophies and exactly

10:52

what he's doing right now. Like you know

10:53

they they believed in certain things and

10:55

they like you know went for those right

10:57

like you know they wrote those down and

10:58

everything. What I don't like about

11:01

religion and everything in that context

11:03

is it's too like you know becomes

11:05

regimentation over time. I mean that's

11:07

how that's how people interpret it as

11:10

like but what I'm saying is at the core

11:12

Yeah. the religions of the world the

11:15

major religions of the world

11:17

are communicating these type of values

11:19

and I'm not going into the religion

11:21

piece of it what I'm saying is the

11:22

beauty of this is

11:24

and this book

11:27

is without bringing religion into it.

11:30

But he did bring religion into it in one

11:32

sense because he's calling him the

11:33

prophet so he's not going into the

11:35

rituals of it. I mean is it religion

11:37

though like you know I mean it's it's

11:40

like the god and the prophet can very

11:43

well exist outside of any religion as

11:45

well.

11:46

Right so so because you're looking from

11:48

the religious lens what if like just say

11:51

it was written even any if any religion

11:54

like before any religion that existed on

11:57

earth or like any ideas that were talked

11:58

about in that sense right calling

12:00

himself the prophet or anything that

12:01

does not mean it's a religion he can

12:04

just talk about god or

12:05

>> I correlate prophet with the religion

12:07

and most people do.

12:08

>> There you go that's what I'm saying

12:10

because the bias is there right that's

12:11

why.

12:11

>> people do most people do. Sure sure but

12:14

but that's the thing you I I think it's

12:17

just a like you know I'll take him as a

12:19

philosopher

12:21

and understand it as such because to be

12:23

honest like But but the book is not

12:25

called the philosopher it's called the

12:26

prophet. So it is a

12:29

undeniably there is a religious not

12:32

religious angle to it but he's

12:34

communicating basically what he's

12:36

communicating in this book is that

12:37

religion teaches you all this without

12:39

without going into a particular type of

12:41

religion or staying away from the

12:43

politics of religions.

12:45

I mean

12:46

personally I fail to see it still but

12:50

because also I'm going to say that

12:53

I'm not sure if I agree with this I'm

12:55

not sure if I agree with this poem like

12:57

because I think about it a lot. And

13:00

like sometimes it feels like you know

13:03

there's there's a concept called first

13:06

of all I don't think he had children or

13:08

he ever took care of his children or if

13:09

he had any. Why why do you say that?

13:12

Because I think I read up somewhere that

13:15

he didn't

13:16

and we can check that. Kahlil Gibran had

13:19

children

13:19

>> saying this whole poem is false like No

13:21

it's it's a it's a it's an idea it's

13:25

it's more of a what you want it to be.

13:29

In real life does it does it translate

13:31

into a real life situations like I don't

13:34

know because because think about this

13:36

think about this right? He says

13:39

you may give them your love but not your

13:41

thoughts. Okay I also have a problem

13:43

with that piece like thoughts I also

13:44

have a problem with that piece like

13:46

thoughts

13:48

I mean what what else are you going to

13:50

do not exist like because if they are

13:52

around you they going to get your

13:53

thoughts and what else do you pass out

13:56

pass to your children don't you pass

13:58

your values don't you pass your like

14:00

certain infrastructure like you know

14:02

structure to their life that hey this is

14:04

a good thing this is a bad thing like

14:06

you know you give them some idea but

14:08

according to this one it just feels like

14:10

there's no structure whatsoever you just

14:13

like let them be.

14:15

Right so so it's the autonomy of the

14:18

kids while they're not even aware what

14:21

life actually means we don't know either

14:24

but we at least more would know more

14:25

than them in that sense right?

14:28

So so what

14:30

to what extent like there's there's no

14:33

there is no

14:35

it's it's too vague it's too vague.

14:42

But but I I still don't think like you

14:44

know I don't agree with it in that sense

14:46

because

14:46

>> I I I agree with that part in the sense

14:49

that I disagree with you may give them

14:51

your love but not your thoughts. I know

14:52

what they're going for but yeah there's

14:54

there's there needs to be a little bit

14:56

more clarity but do you agree with

14:58

you may house their bodies but not their

15:00

souls?

15:01

Yeah

15:02

so so let me let me give you an example

15:04

like what I thought of was first time I

15:06

read it right?

15:07

While I was reading it I was like you

15:09

know

15:11

Like during the same time or something I

15:13

was

15:14

I think I recently found out about

15:16

something called as lighthouse

15:17

parenting.

15:18

Lighthouse parenting essentially means

15:21

that

15:22

like you know what it sounds like you

15:24

know and it it actually comes close to

15:26

what what he's saying is you are

15:29

essentially a lighthouse in the middle

15:32

of the ocean like you know on island or

15:34

something and your kids are essentially

15:36

a ship out in the ocean right? They can

15:39

always look back to you for direction of

15:41

where they are in the ocean if they are

15:43

lost.

15:44

Right? But you don't have any control

15:47

over how they are

15:49

managing themselves in the ocean. Yeah.

15:51

Right?

15:53

That just means that that's just from

15:56

the name right? But the the the whole

15:59

the whole concept of lighthouse

16:01

parenting came from a pediatrician

16:02

actually and she actually had kids and

16:05

she managed her own like you know took

16:07

care of her kids and everything so

16:09

um

16:10

reading more into it

16:13

like on the surface it looks like he's

16:15

saying the same thing

16:16

but when you go into depth into

16:18

lighthouse parenting you understand that

16:19

no there's still a structure there is a

16:22

still like you know certain kind of like

16:24

you know the the principle or the values

16:26

that you create around them. So for

16:28

example for example right? And I think

16:31

it will come back to this again

16:33

when I give that example right?

16:35

In lighthouse parenting I think there

16:37

was a example of um

16:40

um like let just say your kid tomorrow

16:43

like you know they get their heart

16:44

broken or they like you know lose a race

16:47

or something and they're like feel

16:48

defeated and like you know they're not

16:50

feeling

16:52

up to like you know like

16:55

essentially they're not feeling well um

16:59

they're

17:01

sitting in a dark room like you know

17:03

thinking it over and everything. Now

17:06

is your job and metaphorically and

17:09

literally is your job to go turn on that

17:12

light

17:13

or your job is to go sit with them in

17:16

the dark while they figure out what's

17:18

happening.

17:20

Right? And think about this while he

17:23

says

17:24

you may give them your love but not your

17:26

thoughts. So while you are sitting with

17:29

them in that dark room you're giving

17:31

them your love your support but you're

17:33

not giving them your thoughts.

17:35

You're not giving them how to deal with

17:38

it you're letting them deal with it but

17:40

you are in that like you're just

17:42

providing support with you're not fixing

17:44

the problem for them you're being with

17:46

them in the problem. Yeah. And there's a

17:48

difference there right? So so I think

17:53

like when I first read it I didn't agree

17:55

with it but then I read the lighthouse

17:57

parenting and then I came back to it and

17:58

I was just like oh that makes sense if

18:00

we go in certain details and try to

18:02

understand it a little bit.

18:04

>> certain scenarios this makes sense. Yes

18:07

yeah yeah yeah yeah like certain things

18:09

like you know yeah if you just like

18:10

don't give them your thoughts whatsoever

18:12

like you know like your kid is like you

18:14

know

18:15

beating someone up in the street and you

18:16

can't even tell them that hey dude don't

18:18

do that like that's that's bully

18:20

behavior and that's not okay right?

18:23

Then that's not okay like you have to

18:25

give them your thoughts of like how you

18:26

feel about it and they shouldn't be

18:28

doing that to other kids you know. So so

18:31

yes in certain scenarios it it makes

18:33

sense. Yeah but I think that's a given

18:35

I think that's a given.

18:37

What is a given? Like that type of like

18:39

this

18:40

this is not telling you like what what

18:42

the baseline of parenting is. This is

18:44

like going into

18:45

No but I think the biggest problem is

18:48

that like is is parents trying to fix

18:50

the problem of the kids for the kids you

18:52

know and and because

18:55

somehow they have taken the

18:58

role of an entertainer in their life

19:01

where it's their job that when they're

19:03

sad it's somehow parents is job to cheer

19:06

them up. Like

19:08

instead of teaching the kid how to cheer

19:10

themselves up because it's going to take

19:12

time what it's going to take time like

19:14

you know the the the process. Right?

19:19

And you can like you know make an effort

19:21

or something but

19:26

You know like you have to go sit with

19:28

them support them listen to and and I'm

19:31

not talking out of like you know just

19:34

thin air like I've spoken to parents

19:36

about it and

19:37

try to understand different parenting

19:39

styles to to see how do they manage it

19:43

like you know how do they manage the

19:44

first heartbreak or or or like you know

19:47

failing an exam or like something they

19:50

They worked hard for and didn't make it,

19:52

you know. Um how? And also

19:56

again, how you manage it. Like, you

19:58

know, because they're going to learn

19:59

from you as well. Like, you know, you're

20:00

going to have a bad day. Uh when do you

20:02

when you come home after a bad day, how

20:04

do you

20:05

manage it?

20:06

Right?

20:07

Uh that's going to give them some

20:08

guidance. So, um even without you saying

20:12

anything, even without you telling them

20:14

they

20:15

either I would have thought of my case

20:16

say I'm dealing with it, right? Like,

20:18

it's not that. It's just observing you.

20:21

Yeah. In your day-to-day life, right?

20:22

So,

20:23

um

20:29

Yeah.

20:30

>> [laughter]

20:31

>> But, uh but that stability part though,

20:33

I I actually this that's like you said

20:35

that key well, a client only

20:38

well, heavy well, yeah. Uh like I think

20:41

the the whole parenting is in that one

20:43

line. Yeah. Is that that you have to be

20:45

that stable bow. You have to be that

20:47

stable bow for them to go far.

20:50

Yeah. It It wouldn't have to be that

20:52

hard like

20:53

you have to have a good interview

20:55

and say you can say I think about taking

20:58

a new one or not but

21:00

essentially conservative values and the

21:02

rebel that you get rebellion that you

21:04

get against them. Like, you know, how

21:06

does it work? Like, you know, that why

21:08

is it necessary? So, so he said that

21:11

they're both necessary in the society in

21:13

the in the context of key

21:23

Mhm. Uh

21:24

yeah, like you know,

21:26

whatever. Yeah, exactly. Cowboy style,

21:27

right?

21:30

Who's that guy go? Who's that guy go

21:32

somewhere to go conservative values of

21:34

society or would you put that rebellion?

21:36

Mhm. Right?

21:39

You need both of them.

21:42

Who's that guy

21:43

to rather to rather have you have to

21:44

have to have to have to have to have to

21:46

have to have to have to have to have to

21:47

have to have to have to have to have to

21:47

have to have to have to have to have to

21:48

have to

21:49

You need both of them. Been a rebellion

21:52

been a good guy

21:53

with that guy with that guy with that

21:54

guy with that guy with that guy with

21:55

that guy with that guy with that guy

21:56

with that guy with that guy with that

21:57

guy with that guy with that guy with

21:58

that guy with that guy with that guy

21:59

with that guy with that guy

22:01

And at the same time, without that

22:03

thread

22:05

that but that that rock is going to fly

22:07

away Yeah. without any control. Yeah.

22:10

Right? It's a push and pull.

22:12

The way it works is like, you know, you

22:14

have the rotation and you let loose

22:17

every single rotation. You let loose a

22:19

little bit. You lose it. It goes further

22:21

and further and further, Yeah. You trust

22:24

the thread to bring it back. Exactly.

22:26

Right?

22:40

Yeah.

22:53

Yep. And and and that's what we

22:55

understand the society overall, right?

22:57

Like, you know, I'm getting to think

22:58

that you look at the society

23:00

conservative values or rebellion or

23:02

up left is right is you be a but but

23:04

they're both important to the um

23:07

you know,

23:09

to to make the society and balance it

23:11

out.

23:12

Um right now, we're living in extremes.

23:14

So, I don't know how the

23:15

how the society is going to balance

23:17

itself out but at some point it will, I

23:18

think.

23:23

Yeah. Yeah. That's what they keep saying

23:25

and that's what I'm holding on to but

23:27

let's hope

23:28

uh

23:29

yeah, we we come back to some saner or

23:32

sanity.

23:34

Yeah.

23:42

Yeah.

23:45

We're going to let you guys guess in the

23:47

we're not going to explicitly say it.

23:49

But when we we're calling out for

23:51

sanity, it means we are on the other

23:52

side right now, right? So, obviously.

23:55

Yeah. Yeah.

23:56

Yeah. But um but yeah, that was actually

23:58

I think a wonderful poem to cover. Yeah,

24:01

and a great book to read. There's other

24:03

topics in here. I would

24:04

you know, recommend our listeners and

24:07

our

24:08

viewers to go check it out. It's a very

24:10

small book. It's probably the easiest

24:12

book to read cuz you can pick up a

24:14

chapter

24:16

I I sit with it. Like, easier in the

24:18

sense that to read, yes, but you have to

24:21

sit with that chapter. Like, I I have I

24:23

still haven't finished it. Uh

24:31

because I want to sit with that poem and

24:33

I want to like let it settle in. Yeah.

24:36

Then it's kind of it's my just say

24:38

second Joe favorite hair.

24:40

I think it that's became the first

24:42

favorite. I think it's it's called

24:43

reason and passion. I'm trying to find

24:45

it. But but check that one out as well

24:47

and I think we should cover it.

24:52

How

24:54

he connected um

24:57

you know, like this whole divinity to

25:00

how your reasons and your passions are

25:01

like your logic and your your you know,

25:10

passion and how you can say

25:12

balance out that the circle of how you

25:14

can use use that to you.

25:18

Do you want to read it or do we do it in

25:19

another episode? No, another episode.

25:21

Like, that one needs yeah, reason and

25:23

passion. Yeah, that one needs its own

25:24

episode.

25:32

Yeah,

25:33

that's very good. I'm excited. We should

25:34

do more. I think there's 26 of them in

25:36

here and we can even find more

25:39

>> [music]

25:39

>> interesting ones

25:41

and bring some more.

25:42

All right.

25:43

Well, thank you, everyone. Thank you.

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free