Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

The Second Yahweh: Why It Wasn’t Heresy Until the 2nd Century | Michael Heiser

41:061,561 summary words · ~8 min readEnglishBy John 14:6Transcribed Aug 28, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

The high Christology of the New Testament and the doctrine of the Godhead were not late Greco-Roman inventions, but direct continuations of an ancient Jewish 'Two Powers in Heaven' theology rooted in Old Testament depictions of a visible, embodied Yahweh alongside the invisible Yahweh.

It dismantles the skeptical claim that Christian trinitarian theology was an unbiblical corruption of Jewish monotheism, demonstrating instead that early Jews possessed the precise theological framework required to recognize Jesus as Yahweh incarnate without violating the Shema.

Section summaries

0:00-5:10

The Godhead and the 'Two Powers' Historical Setting

watch

Heiser opens by introducing the theme of God appearing in human form throughout the Old Testament. He explains that modern groups denying the Godhead—such as modern Rabbinic Judaism, Unitarians, and Jehovah's Witnesses—often rely on the assumption that Trinitarian theology was invented centuries later by Greek church councils. Heiser introduces the historical reality that ancient Judaism held a 'Two Powers in Heaven' doctrine consisting of two Yahweh figures until it was declared heretical in the 2nd century AD due to the rise of Christianity. He highlights that viewing the Old Testament correctly refutes mainstream skeptical arguments like those posed by Bart Ehrman regarding the split between the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.

  • The Godhead concept has deep textual roots across the 75% of the Bible found in the Old Testament.
  • Rabbinic Judaism formally outlawed the 'Two Powers in Heaven' doctrine in the 2nd century AD to counter Christian claims.
  • Skeptical theories alleging Christ's deity was invented centuries later fail to account for Second Temple Jewish data.

Establishes the historical and apologetic stakes of the lecture.

5:10-10:20

The Shema, John's Gospel, and Old Testament Plurality

watch

The lecture contrasts the foundational monotheistic confession of Deuteronomy 6:4 (the Shema) with the prologue of John's Gospel, where John describes the Word as both being with God and being God. Heiser questions how monotheistic first-century Jews could worship Jesus alongside the Father without feeling they violated Deuteronomy 6. He cites academic works by Jewish scholars Alan Segal ('The Two Powers in Heaven') and Benjamin Sommer ('The Bodies of God') to demonstrate that Jewish scholarship recognizes divine plurality and embodiment in the Hebrew Bible. Heiser highlights Genesis 19:24 as a classic Hebrew text where Yahweh on earth rains fire 'from Yahweh out of heaven,' showing dual divine agency.

  • Jewish monotheists were able to worship Jesus because their scriptures already allowed for a complex divine unity.
  • Alan Segal established that a co-regent 'Second Yahweh' was orthodox Jewish theology until the 2nd century.
  • Genesis 19:24 exhibits two distinct Yahweh figures acting simultaneously in heaven and on earth.

Provides crucial academic sources and foundational textual examples of Old Testament divine plurality.

10:20-18:36

The Angel of Yahweh, 'The Name', and Divine Deliverance

watch

Heiser examines Exodus 3, where both the Angel of Yahweh and Yahweh speak out of the burning bush interchangeably. He moves to Exodus 23:20–21, where God instructs Moses to obey the Angel because 'My Name is in him' and he has the divine prerogative to pardon transgressions. Heiser connects this to the Jewish practice of referring to God as 'Hashem' ('The Name') and demonstrates from Deuteronomy 12 and Psalm 20 that the Name is a personification of Yahweh's presence. Comparing Deuteronomy 4 and Judges 2, he shows that the Bible interchangeably attributes the Exodus deliverance to God, His Presence, His Name, and the Angel of Yahweh.

  • In Exodus 23, the Angel of the Lord carries the personal presence and pardoning authority of Yahweh via 'the Name.'
  • 'Hashem' ('The Name') functions across the Hebrew Bible as a personal identifier for God's visible essence.
  • The Old Testament attributes Israel's Exodus deliverance synonymously to Yahweh, the Divine Name, the Presence, and the Angel.

Explains the linguistic and theological equation between the Angel of Yahweh and the divine Name.

18:36-24:48

Jacob’s Encounter and Grammatical Singularities

watch

Focusing on Genesis 31:11–13, Heiser points out where the Angel of God explicitly declares to Jacob, 'I am the God of Bethel.' He then walks through Jacob’s deathbed blessing of Joseph's sons in Genesis 48:15–16. In this passage, Jacob structures a three-part blessing invoking 'the God before whom my fathers walked' and 'the Angel who redeemed me from all harm.' Heiser highlights that the operative Hebrew blessing verb ('May he bless') is strictly singular rather than plural, grammatically equating the Angel with God Almighty. He refutes the common counterargument that the Angel was merely an authoritative human messenger delivering a royal decree.

  • The Angel of God explicitly identifies Himself as 'the God of Bethel' in Genesis 31.
  • Genesis 48:15–16 grammatically equates ha-Elohim and ha-Malak through a singular blessing verb.
  • The messenger agency argument fails in Genesis 48 because the text records Jacob's theological prayer, not the Angel's speech.

Delivers an essential Hebrew grammatical argument proving identity between the Angel and God.

24:48-29:58

The Embodied 'Word of the Lord' in 1 Samuel and Jeremiah

watch

Heiser addresses the phrase 'the Word of the Lord,' challenging the conventional assumption that it only refers to an audible internal voice. In Genesis 15:1 and 1 Samuel 3, the Word comes as a visual manifestation ('vision') where Yahweh appears and stands before the prophet. In Jeremiah 1, the Word of the Lord is both visible and tactile, reaching out a physical hand to touch Jeremiah’s mouth. Heiser explains that John’s prologue ('the Word became flesh') drew directly upon these Old Testament anthropomorphic appearances of Yahweh rather than abstract Hellenistic philosophy.

  • The 'Word of the Lord' in the Old Testament appears as a physical, visible person, not merely a sound or thought.
  • In 1 Samuel 3:21, Yahweh reveals Himself visually at Shiloh 'by the Word of the Lord.'
  • Jeremiah 1 portrays the Word of the Lord physically touching the prophet's mouth.
  • John 1:1 is grounded in Old Testament theophanies of the Word rather than Platonic philosophy.

Provides direct Old Testament context for Johannine Logos Christology.

29:58-34:06

The 'Cloud Rider' Motif and Theological Polemics

watch

Heiser introduces Ugaritic literature and the Baal Cycle, explaining that Baal was widely known across the ancient Mediterranean as the 'Rider on the Clouds' who controlled storms and agriculture. The Old Testament writers polemically seized this prestigious title five times (such as in Psalm 68, Psalm 104, and Isaiah 19) and attributed it to Yahweh to declare His supremacy over Canaanite deities. Heiser sets up the crucial theological problem: who receives this exclusive divine title in its final Old Testament occurrence?

  • In Canaanite mythology, the title 'Rider on the Clouds' denoted full deity status for the storm-god Baal.
  • Hebrew biblical authors intentionally appropriated this title for Yahweh as a theological polemic.
  • Four of the five Old Testament 'Cloud Rider' passages assign the title directly to the transcendent Yahweh.

Explains the Ancient Near Eastern background necessary to understand Daniel 7 and the Gospels.

34:06-40:18

Daniel 7, Caiaphas's Trial, and High Christology

watch

Heiser brings all the motifs together by analyzing Daniel 7, where the fifth 'Cloud Rider' reference is assigned not to the Ancient of Days, but to 'one like a Son of Man' coming to the divine throne. When Jesus stands trial in Matthew 26 and quotes this Daniel 7 scene to Caiaphas, Caiaphas immediately recognizes it as an explicit claim to be the Second Yahweh of Israel, tearing his robes in response to blasphemy. Heiser concludes that New Testament Christology, Jude 5, and John’s High Priestly prayer seamlessly align with the Old Testament’s two Yahweh figures, proving that Christian belief in the Godhead is thoroughly biblical and historically rooted across both testaments.

  • Daniel 7:13 gives Yahweh’s exclusive 'Cloud Rider' title to an embodied, human-like Son of Man.
  • Jesus claimed to be the Second Yahweh when invoking the Cloud Rider before Caiaphas in Matthew 26:64.
  • Caiaphas charged Jesus with blasphemy because he fully grasped the Two Powers implication of Daniel 7.
  • Christian trinitarian theology is the organic fulfillment of Old Testament binitarian categories.

Delivers the climactic synthesis linking the Old Testament data directly to the trial of Jesus.

Key points

  • Two Powers in Heaven as Legitimate Second Temple Orthodoxy — Ancient Judaism accepted the reality of two Yahweh figures—one invisible and transcendent, the other visible and immanent—as orthodox theology until the rabbinic establishment declared it a heresy in the 2nd century AD to counter the rise of Christianity.
  • The Personified 'Name' and the Angel of Yahweh — In passages like Exodus 23:20–21 and Deuteronomy 12, 'the Name' (Hashem) is treated not as abstract nomenclature but as the personal, visible presence of Yahweh dwelling inside the Angel of the Lord who forgives sins.
  • Grammatical Identity in Jacob’s Blessing — In Genesis 48:15–16, Jacob invokes 'the God (ha-Elohim) before whom my fathers walked' and parallelizes Him with 'the Angel (ha-Malak) who redeemed me,' followed immediately by a singular verb: 'May he [singular] bless the boys.'
  • The 'Cloud Rider' Title in Daniel 7 and Caiaphas's Reaction — The Ancient Near Eastern epithet 'Rider on the Clouds'—used exclusively of Yahweh across five Old Testament passages—is given to the human 'Son of Man' in Daniel 7:13; when Jesus applies this title to Himself before Caiaphas, the High Priest tears his robes over an explicit claim to be the second Yahweh.
This used to be known as the two powers in heaven teaching. And it was part of Jewish theology until the 2 century AD. Then it was declared a heresy. Michael Heiser
Visions are things that you see. Got it? Do I need to repeat that? Visions are things that you see. This is a visual experience. Michael Heiser

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:05

Are we on? Okay.

0:08

Yeah. All you really need to know is I

0:11

love biblical studies and I like pugs.

0:14

So,

0:16

honestly,

0:18

I'm a I'm a big pug. We have two pugs. I

0:20

could talk about my pugs for the whole

0:22

hour.

0:23

It's kind of pathetic, I know. But uh

0:27

what I want to talk about today, as you

0:29

can see on the screen, is God as man in

0:33

the Old Testament.

0:36

And the title might throw you off

0:38

because we're used to thinking of God as

0:40

man in the New Testament with Jesus. But

0:43

believe it or not, there is this thing

0:45

called the Old Testament. It's

0:46

threequarters of your Bible. It actually

0:49

leads to the New Testament. and the

0:52

notion of a god head.

0:56

Okay, we would use a term like trinity.

1:00

I would say not I want to say you know

1:03

that it has seeds in the old testament

1:05

but I would go further. I think it's

1:06

actually deeply rooted in the old

1:09

testament and I want to go through a few

1:11

passages today to talk about that theme

1:14

and since this is an apologetics month

1:18

I'm going to frontload the payoff here.

1:22

Uh

1:23

there are lots of groups that deny a

1:25

godhead. Okay, you're familiar with some

1:27

of these. I have Judaism, of course,

1:29

Unitarians, Jehovah's Witnesses,

1:32

uh you know, oneness Pentecostals within

1:34

the Christian tradition. We could add

1:37

here.

1:38

It's important to note that

1:42

many of these groups, these are just,

1:44

you know, some representative ones,

1:47

they are not aware at all of the kinds

1:50

of things I'm going to show you today.

1:52

Even Judaism,

1:54

if I remember, I I'll tell you a couple

1:56

of stories along the way, but Judaism

1:59

used to teach that there was a Godhead.

2:04

Yes, you heard me correctly. Okay?

2:06

there. And there are a few Jews today in

2:08

scholarship that remember

2:13

remember this that are tuned into it and

2:16

again are familiar. You know, I can

2:18

pretty well pretty well count them on

2:20

one hand

2:22

that are familiar and conversing with

2:24

what I'm going to show you today. But

2:25

most Jews have no idea of their own

2:28

history here because the notion of a

2:31

godhead and for them it started out as

2:33

two two Yahweh figures. Okay? Not one

2:37

good and one evil. This is not dualism.

2:39

But two that were Yahweh. They were the

2:41

same but yet different.

2:43

This used to be known as the two powers

2:45

in heaven teaching. And it was part of

2:48

Jewish theology until the 2 century AD.

2:51

Then it was declared a heresy.

2:54

Probably not coincidentally because that

2:57

coincides with the rise of the early

2:59

church with Christologology.

3:02

But all these groups are going to sort

3:03

of base their denials on certain

3:05

assumptions that things in the New

3:08

Testament just sort of come out of

3:09

nowhere

3:11

and that is not the case. So that's one

3:15

thing we want to talk about.

3:18

There are others who say that the New

3:20

Testament doctrine is contrived

3:21

completely. And how many times have you

3:24

This is an old Newsweek, by the way. I

3:26

apologies to Mark Maguire fans. Uh he's

3:30

in the corner of this but this is an old

3:32

one but I like it because it has when

3:35

you know how Jesus became Christ

3:39

scholarship and it has worked its way

3:42

into the popular discourse okay on the

3:45

internet different TV specials they like

3:47

to talk about the Jesus of history and

3:51

the Christ of faith like they're two

3:54

different guys and for them they are

3:57

because their position is that all of

3:59

this notion of christologology that

4:02

Jesus being God that was invented by the

4:06

Christian church centuries after

4:10

the New Testament period, centuries

4:14

after the New Testament was written.

4:18

Again, you you have somebody like

4:19

Bartman, okay, who's a very famous New

4:22

Testament, you know, scholar

4:25

will

4:26

say things like this. This is mainstream

4:29

scholarship to to to create this

4:32

dichotomy. But if you can see in the Old

4:34

Testament where the idea of a godhead

4:36

lives, you will realize that this notion

4:39

that this idea was invented centuries

4:42

later is just ridiculous.

4:44

It is something that runs contrary to

4:46

the data that we have. So that's the

4:49

angle for today. I as far as the

4:52

apologetic payoff. You need to be aware

4:56

that your belief in a trinity and

4:58

specifically the idea of of you know

5:00

Christ being God and and and yet God

5:03

being God, the father and the son, this

5:06

is not a new thing. It wasn't invented

5:08

in the New Testament and it wasn't

5:10

invented later. It has deep roots in the

5:13

Old Testament. So let's start off with

5:16

Deuteronomy 6:4. We all know this verse

5:18

even if we're not Jewish. Here, O

5:21

Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is

5:23

want. This is the creedle statement of

5:25

Judaism. Basically, nothing is more

5:29

important to Jewish thought than this

5:33

verse.

5:35

However,

5:37

you had a Jew write this and you had

5:39

many Jews believe it. In the beginning

5:42

was the word. The word was with God and

5:44

the word was God.

5:47

Okay, very familiar verse.

5:50

You go down in that same chapter, the

5:52

word became flesh and dwelt among us.

5:56

You keep reading and you hit John 1:18.

6:00

Let's go back. No one has ever seen God.

6:03

Not just look at the wording of this. No

6:06

one has ever seen God. The only God who

6:09

is at the father's side. Well, wait a

6:13

minute. How can the only God be at the

6:16

father's side? Isn't the only God the

6:18

father?

6:21

Okay. Again, John is a Jew. He's writing

6:24

this.

6:26

The only God who's at the father's side,

6:28

he has made him. He's the one who makes

6:30

the father known.

6:33

How in the world,

6:35

here's the question. How is it that a

6:38

first century Jew

6:41

so committed to monotheism, again the

6:43

shama, the Lord our God is one, they're

6:46

so committed to this idea that they are

6:48

willing to be put to death rather than

6:51

offer sacrifice

6:53

to the emperor who claimed to be a god

6:55

or some other god. I mean they they're

6:57

serious about this. They are serious

6:59

about Deuteronomy 6, the Lord our God is

7:02

one. But at the same time,

7:06

multitudes of Jews

7:09

can worship Jesus

7:12

while worshiping the father. Like, how

7:15

how does that work? Why was that not

7:18

conceived of as a violation

7:21

of Deuteronomy 6? That's what we're

7:24

going to talk about.

7:26

Now, I mentioned that this used to be

7:28

Jewish theology.

7:30

If you have a Jewish friend and you get

7:32

into into conversations about what we're

7:34

going to talk about today,

7:37

if they are serious people and actually

7:39

want to learn about their own heritage,

7:41

I recommend this book. It was written in

7:43

1977. Allan Seagull. Seagull passed away

7:46

a few years ago.

7:48

The two powers in heaven. He was a Jew.

7:52

Didn't convert to Christianity. He was a

7:54

Jew. Taught rabbitics at Brandeise

7:58

University for many years.

8:00

knows the rabbitic material really,

8:02

really well. Writes this book and

8:06

basically he has one question.

8:10

He knew the rabbitic material so well

8:12

that he knew that in ancient times this

8:16

idea of a godhead was part of their

8:18

theology. And so what he wanted to know

8:20

is when did we lose that?

8:23

When did that go away? Why don't we say

8:26

this now?

8:28

And this again was the book that grew

8:30

out of that question. And he was very,

8:33

you know, very capably determined the

8:35

idea of a co-year, a second Yahweh

8:39

figure in the Old Testament

8:41

was not considered heretical until the 2

8:44

century CE, the common era AD. This is a

8:48

Jew saying that. I could show you other

8:51

books. Benjamin Summer, The Bodies of

8:53

God. He's a Jewish biblical scholar,

8:55

teaches at Jewish theological seminary,

8:58

like he's a Jew, okay? And he'll say

9:01

things in that book like the idea of a

9:04

trinity, a Christian trinity is

9:07

completely compatible with the Hebrew

9:08

Bible.

9:11

Just not even batting an eye.

9:17

Where do they get this? Here's Genesis

9:19

19:24. Take a good look at it. The

9:23

translation is from the Tanakh Holy

9:26

Scriptures, the English translation of

9:28

the Hebrew Bible put out by the Jewish

9:31

Publication Society. So, I'm not

9:33

cheating with an evangelical translation

9:36

like there is one.

9:39

Take a good look at the verse. What's

9:41

odd about it?

9:46

Just look at it and read it to yourself.

9:51

Maybe this will help.

9:55

How can you have Yahweh

9:58

raining upon Sodom and Gomorrah?

10:00

Sulurous fire from Yahweh.

10:05

It just sounds weird.

10:08

It sounds like there's two. Like one is

10:11

kind of referred to in the third person.

10:13

Like what? It's just odd.

10:17

There are number of passages like this

10:19

where God

10:22

is brought up in a passage and then

10:24

referred to again in the third person to

10:26

distinguish that one from the other one.

10:29

I'm going to try I'm going to take you

10:31

through some some simpler passages

10:33

though in the Old Testament to show

10:35

where this idea was from. And again, for

10:38

our purposes, the next time you hear

10:40

somebody say that an idea like the deity

10:43

of Christ that's so central to our faith

10:45

was invented by the church in some grand

10:48

conspiracy or whatever, you're going to

10:51

know that that they're just

10:54

they're undertaught. [laughter]

10:57

Okay? They're just undertaught. They're

10:58

underexposed to the data. So here's

11:01

Exodus 3. A lot of these passages are

11:04

going to be really familiar.

11:06

Moses tending the flock of his

11:08

father-in-law Jethro the priest of

11:10

Midian drove the flock into the

11:12

wilderness comes to Horeb the mountain

11:14

of God

11:15

an angel of Yahweh appeared to him in a

11:18

blazing fire out of a bush so who's in

11:21

the bush burning bush you know Charlton

11:24

H okay just like you know put get him in

11:27

your head again who's in the bush

11:31

an angel the angel of the Lord is in the

11:33

bush but when Yahweh He saw that he had

11:37

turned aside to look. God called to him

11:40

out of the bush.

11:42

Who's in the bush? Is it the angel or

11:46

God? The answer is yeah,

11:54

there's two. There's two in the there's

11:56

there's a joke in there about birds and

11:58

bushes, but I'm not going to go there.

12:02

Exodus 23, I'm sending an angel before

12:04

you to guard you on the way and to bring

12:06

you to the place that I have made ready.

12:08

Pay heed to him and obey him. Do not

12:10

defy him, for he will not pardon your

12:12

offenses.

12:14

Okay, which is odd because like only God

12:17

can pardon offenses. But now here we

12:18

have this angel doing it. But this

12:20

angel, God tells Moses, "Look, on your

12:22

way to the promised land, I'm going to

12:23

send this angel ahead of you and you

12:25

better listen to him because my name is

12:27

in him."

12:29

Now, that is a a phrase that doesn't

12:31

really mean much to us,

12:34

but it meant a lot to a Jew and to

12:37

someone who is very familiar with the

12:39

the Hebrew Bible. Now, when I was in

12:41

grad school,

12:42

I went to the University of Wisconsin

12:44

for my PhD, and we had uh not everybody

12:48

on the faculty was a Jew, but we we had,

12:50

you know, certain Jewish professors, and

12:52

one of them was sort of serious about

12:54

the divine name. So we we got into class

12:56

the first day and he says, "Now look,

13:01

when we're reading text in class,

13:04

I don't want to hear the divine name. I

13:08

don't want to hear you pronounce it."

13:10

You have two choices when you come to

13:12

the divine name in class. One is you can

13:14

say Adonai, which means Lord. And the

13:18

other one you can say is Hashem,

13:22

which means the name

13:26

The name even among Jews today, that

13:28

phrase the name is a way of referring to

13:32

God himself.

13:35

And it is in the Hebrew Bible too.

13:38

Deuteronomy 12, do not worship the Lord

13:40

your God in like manner. Again, Moses

13:42

instructing the Israelites, don't do

13:44

things like you know the pagans did or

13:46

the way we used to.

13:48

look only to the site that the Lord your

13:50

God will choose amidst your tribes as

13:52

his habitation to establish his name

13:54

there. Now, we know that, you know,

13:57

Deuteronomy again, we're we're heading

13:59

out of, you know, it's the second law

14:01

and all that. We're heading out of, you

14:03

know, this part of Israel's history.

14:05

They're going to go to the promised

14:06

land. And eventually in the promised

14:07

land, the plan is to have a temple,

14:11

okay? A place where we worship God. And

14:14

so this is going to be the place where

14:16

God establishes his name. So when you

14:19

when you go to worship there, you're to

14:21

go, you must bring everything I command

14:22

you to the site where the Lord your God

14:24

will choose to establish his name. Now,

14:27

does that mean that when we build the

14:29

temple, God's going to like show up with

14:32

a crayon or something and write YHW

14:35

on the building or on the door? Well,

14:38

I've established my name there. I just

14:40

wrote it. No, it has nothing to do with

14:43

the pictorial depiction of the divine

14:47

name.

14:48

Establishing my name there means

14:52

I am going to choose to dwell there.

14:55

Okay, it it's the place that's my house

14:57

that I own it. Psalm 20 verse1, look at

15:01

the parallelism. May the Lord answer you

15:04

in the day of trouble. May the name of

15:06

the God of Jacob protect you.

15:10

Okay, I can guarantee that when it when

15:13

you have a bunch of Israelite soldiers

15:14

and there they are arrayed for battle

15:16

and here come the Philistines or whoever

15:18

the the the enemy of the month is. Okay,

15:21

they're not going to stand there and

15:23

start shouting the name

15:25

or shouting four consonants. They're not

15:28

going to be thinking, I hope the four

15:30

consonants like did I remember to write

15:32

them on my uniform here?

15:35

They're not hoping to be protected by

15:37

four consonants.

15:39

They're hoping to be protected by God.

15:41

And so the name is a way to refer to God

15:45

himself.

15:48

The Lord answer you. May the name of the

15:49

of the God of Jacob protect you. Some

15:51

trust in chariots and some in horses,

15:53

but we trust in the name of the Lord our

15:56

God. Again, it doesn't mean that we

15:58

trust in four consonants

16:00

or something we can verbalize. We trust

16:03

in God. So, Hashem, this is where Jews

16:06

today get the idea of referring to God

16:09

himself with Hashem, the name. It means

16:12

the same thing as God.

16:15

Here we have the name depicted as a

16:17

person. Behold, the name of the Lord

16:20

comes from afar in blazing wrath with a

16:22

heavy burden, his lips full of fury, his

16:25

tongue like devouring fire. So, the name

16:27

is personified here. This is a depiction

16:30

of the deity of of God himself.

16:34

If you could take all that and go back

16:36

to Exodus 23, why is this angel special?

16:41

God says, listen to this one. He won't

16:43

pardon your transgressions, your

16:45

offenses,

16:47

because my name is in him. What God is

16:51

telling Moses is that, you know, this

16:53

angel I'm going to send ahead of you,

16:54

you're going to see him, you know, like

16:55

a lot.

16:57

That's me.

16:59

I am in that angel. That is me in

17:03

visible form.

17:08

Deuteronomy 4:35-37.

17:12

Before I get into this

17:14

verse, if I asked you the question, who

17:17

was it that delivered the Israelites

17:21

from Egypt and brought them into the

17:23

promised land? You'd all say, well, God

17:25

did that, the God of Israel. You're

17:28

right. But if you actually looked it up

17:30

in a concordance, what you're going to

17:33

find is some passages say God did it.

17:36

Some passages say the divine name did

17:38

it. Some passages say the presence of

17:42

the Lord did it. Brought them out of

17:45

Egypt with his own presence. And other

17:47

passages will say this. The angel of

17:51

Yahweh came up from Gilgal to Bohem and

17:53

said, "I brought you up from Egypt and

17:55

took you into the land which I

17:56

promised." Wait a minute.

17:58

I thought God did that.

18:01

I thought God brought them up from Egypt

18:03

and brought them to the land. But here

18:06

it's the angel.

18:09

So who brought the Israelites out of

18:11

Egypt

18:13

and into the promised land? Was it God,

18:16

Elohim, Yahweh, divine name, the

18:20

presence, or the angel? The answer is

18:23

yep.

18:26

There are four ways of referring to the

18:28

same thing.

18:32

Genesis 31, this is the Jacob and Laban

18:34

story.

18:36

You know, it's got this weird sheep

18:38

mating kind of thing. Like, what's going

18:40

on there? In the breeding season of the

18:41

flock, you know, Jacob's having a

18:44

problem with Laban and they're competing

18:46

and Jacob's getting more births, you

18:49

know, than than Laban is. And we get

18:51

this little explanation. And so I I I

18:53

saw in a dream that the goats that mated

18:55

with the flock were stripes, spotted and

18:57

modeled. Then the angel of God said to

18:59

me in the dream, Jacob, and I said,

19:01

"Here I am." He said, "Lift up your eyes

19:04

and see all the goats that mate with a

19:06

flock or stripes spotted and modeled.

19:10

For I have seen all that Laban is doing

19:11

to you. I am the God of Bethl."

19:17

The angel says, "I am the God of Bethl."

19:23

What's Bethl?

19:25

Remember Jacob's story when he runs away

19:27

from home? Bethl is the first place he

19:31

encounters Yahweh

19:34

and he builds an altar there.

19:37

This angel saying, "I am Yahweh.

19:41

I am the God of Bethl.

19:46

This is my favorite passage.

19:49

This is one what? The last time I had a

19:51

Jehovah's Witness come to my door.

19:54

Look, I know what you're I know what

19:57

you're thinking. It's time to beat up on

20:00

the Jehovah's W. No, just just trust me.

20:03

It it there's no payoff to that. You

20:05

should be kind and and try to have a

20:08

conversation, a real conversation with

20:10

them. But I was in a hurry. And so,

20:17

and so I thought, okay, I'm gonna give

20:20

you something that's not on the script

20:24

because they follow a script. I mean,

20:26

honestly, they do. This is how they're

20:27

they're trained and discipled. So, I I

20:30

said to them, "Now, you want me to

20:32

believe that that Jesus isn't God, that

20:35

Jesus is a created being, kind of like

20:37

the top angel or something, right? You

20:39

know, like a lesser being?" Yeah. Are

20:42

you sure that Jehovah is not an angel?

20:46

Oh, no. No. I mean, he can't be an

20:49

angel. You know, uncreated and all this.

20:51

It's Jehovah. Are you sure? Yeah. Are

20:54

you po I mean, I did this like four

20:56

times.

20:58

Probably thinking I'm trying to irritate

20:59

them. I just wanted to know because I I

21:01

want to show you something in the Torah.

21:05

And we're not going to worry about the

21:06

New Testament here. This is Jacob

21:09

blessing Joseph's children, which we all

21:11

know the story, the cross, hands, and

21:13

you know, the confusion. We teach this

21:15

in Sunday school, but we never actually

21:17

teach anybody what he says. You know, we

21:20

just sort of teach the scene. Israel,

21:23

Jacob stretched out his right hand and

21:25

laid it on Ephraim's head, though he was

21:27

the younger, and his left hand on

21:29

Manass's head, thus crossing his hands,

21:31

although Manasseh was the firstborn. And

21:33

he blessed Joseph again through his sons

21:35

saying now catch this the prayer has

21:39

three stanzas

21:43

the God and it's ha Elohim the God who

21:46

in whose ways my fathers Abraham and

21:49

Isaac walked

21:52

the God ha Elohim who has been my

21:55

shepherd from my birth to this day. What

21:58

do you expect to see in the third

22:00

stanza?

22:02

H Elohim something else.

22:05

That's not what you get.

22:07

The angel

22:10

ha malak who has redeemed me from all

22:13

harm.

22:15

May he bless these lads.

22:20

Now if you know anything about Hebrew,

22:21

you will know that this verb form is

22:23

singular. In other words, you can't

22:26

translate it. May they bless the boys.

22:31

May he?

22:34

Well, who's he? Is it Is it God or the

22:36

angel? The answer is, "Yep."

22:40

So, I said to the Jehovah's Witness,

22:42

"See that."

22:45

Got my little my inner linear out, you

22:48

know? I said, "Now either Jehovah is an

22:51

angel

22:53

or this angel just happens to be

22:55

Jehovah."

22:58

And now we can have a really interesting

23:00

conversation. Oh, it's time to leave.

23:02

I'll send somebody back to the house.

23:04

You know,

23:06

this is not on the script. I can

23:09

guarantee it. And let me say something

23:10

else, too. Some of these angel passages

23:13

in in in scholarship,

23:16

the push back I or somebody else would

23:19

would get going through these is that,

23:21

well, Mike, you have to understand that

23:24

that you know, angels were messengers.

23:27

And when a when a king like in the

23:30

ancient near east sent a messenger out,

23:33

the king gave them the authority to like

23:36

pretend they were the king. And so they

23:38

would use first person and say, "I this

23:41

and I that." But everybody knew they

23:43

weren't the king. They were just a

23:45

messenger. So you can't equate these

23:47

things. Oh, really? Oh, okay. Can you

23:50

show me where the angel speaks in this

23:52

passage?

23:56

He doesn't.

23:59

So the messenger argument flies out the

24:03

window.

24:06

What you have is you have Jacob's

24:08

assessment under inspiration

24:11

of the relationship of Elohim to Hamal.

24:16

And he says, "May he bless the boys."

24:20

There is no distinction.

24:23

perfect opportunity to use a plural verb

24:25

and make sure that your Jews, your

24:28

fellow Israelites reading their own

24:30

scriptures don't get confused.

24:35

But the scripture doesn't say that.

24:39

It uses the singular.

24:43

Here's another one. So that's the angel

24:45

in the name. Here's the word.

24:48

Now, this is a phrase we're very well

24:50

familiar with.

24:52

After these things, the word of the Lord

24:54

came to Abram in a vision. Don't be

24:56

afraid, Abram. You know, I'm your shield

24:58

and your great reward. See, we we tend

25:00

to think that the word of the Lord is a

25:02

voice inside somebody's head. And you

25:05

know, in many passages, it is, but there

25:07

are some passages like this. After these

25:10

things, the word of the Lord came to

25:11

Abram in a vision. Now, if you're taking

25:13

notes, I'm going to say something really

25:14

profound here, but I don't want you to

25:16

miss it. You ready?

25:19

Visions are things that you see.

25:23

Got it? Do I need to repeat that?

25:27

Visions are things that you see.

25:31

This is a visual experience. Okay. He

25:34

sees the word of the Lord.

25:39

First Samuel 3. We know this story, too.

25:42

You're already thinking word of the

25:44

Lord. John chapter 1.

25:47

Okay. 1st Samuel 3. This is the Samuel

25:50

story. You know, Samuel was raised, you

25:52

know, by Eli after his mother, you know,

25:54

gave him to fulfill her vow.

25:58

And it's time to go to bed and they're

26:00

trying to, you get some sleep and Samuel

26:03

hears this voice, you know, calling out

26:05

to him and he thinks it's Eli. So he

26:07

goes, "What do you want?" And Eli's

26:09

like, "It's not me." And it happens a

26:11

few times. And so, you know, Eli gets a

26:15

little a little inspiration, you know,

26:18

when it starts to repeat. But we it's

26:20

the the whole episode starts out this

26:22

way. Verse one. Now, the young man

26:24

Samuel was ministering to the Lord to

26:26

Yahweh under Eli, and the word of the

26:29

Lord was rare in those days. There was

26:30

no frequent vision.

26:33

It doesn't say words didn't pop into

26:36

people's head very often.

26:39

No, it says there was no frequent

26:42

vision.

26:44

The word of the Lord is showing up in

26:46

visible form.

26:50

Now Samuel, skip to verse 7, had not yet

26:52

experienced the Lord. The word of the

26:54

Lord had not yet been revealed to him.

26:58

Okay? And then you go on and and this

27:00

happens the third time because Eli said,

27:02

"Well, look, it's not me and it ain't

27:04

you. So like if it happens again say

27:07

speak Lord for your servant is here your

27:09

servant's listening. And so this is what

27:10

Samuel's going to do. So the third time

27:13

now look at the wording.

27:15

The Lord and again it's it's the divine

27:17

name Yahweh came and stood.

27:25

If he was invisible

27:27

you can't use words like standing.

27:31

Okay. If I if I introduced the invisible

27:34

man right here next to me,

27:37

okay, you you can't see anything. You

27:39

don't know if he's sitting, standing,

27:40

sprawling, jumping up and down.

27:44

He's not invisible.

27:46

The Lord comes the third time. He was

27:51

that that's that's who was behind the

27:52

other ones and he's standing.

27:55

And in the earlier verse, the Lord was

27:57

referred to as the word of the Lord.

28:02

It's a visual experience. You go to the

28:04

end of the chapter, Samuel grew and the

28:07

Lord Yahweh was with him and let none of

28:10

his words fall to the ground. And all of

28:11

Israel from Dan to Bees Shabbah knew

28:13

that Samuel was established as a prophet

28:15

to the Lord. And the Lord appeared.

28:18

There it is again, visual language. The

28:22

Lord appeared again at Shiloh where this

28:25

incident happened. The Lord revealed

28:27

himself to Samuel at Shiloh by or as the

28:31

word of the Lord.

28:38

Jeremiah 1. This is the call of

28:40

Jeremiah. Again, probably you're

28:42

familiar with this. It's it's a good

28:44

preaching passage.

28:46

The word of the Lord came to me saying,

28:50

right there you think, oh, he has a

28:51

voice in his head. Well, before I formed

28:54

you in the womb, I knew you. Verse six,

28:57

then I said, you know, he responds, ah,

28:59

Lord God. So he he refers to the word of

29:02

the Lord as Lord God, truly I did not

29:05

know how to speak, for I am only a boy.

29:08

But the Lord said, don't, you know,

29:09

don't tell me you're only a boy.

29:12

For you shall go to all whom I send you.

29:14

Verse nine, then the Lord, you know the

29:16

word of the Lord, Lord put out his hand

29:20

and touched my mouth.

29:24

This is not only a visual experience.

29:27

It's tactile.

29:30

Okay, this is God embodied in the form

29:32

of a man in the Old Testament.

29:39

Another one, the cloud rider. This is a

29:41

little more obscure. And this is

29:42

probably the only time here in church

29:44

you're ever going to see a passage from

29:47

the Baal cycle. [laughter]

29:50

What a treat. I'm showing you this

29:53

passage from the ba cycle to make a

29:55

specific point. When you get into this

29:57

this discussion,

30:00

especially if you're talking with a

30:01

unitarian or, you know, Jehovah's

30:03

Witness or somebody else who wants to

30:04

deny a trinity,

30:06

they'll talk about Jesus being less than

30:09

God. like a little less than God, but

30:10

he's still less than God. You know, he's

30:12

like not this and not that and God.

30:15

Okay? All right.

30:18

Hold that in your head because I'm going

30:20

to tell you something about Baal. You

30:22

see this this Baal phrase here

30:24

underlined, he's referred to as the

30:27

charioteer of the clouds in Canaanite

30:30

literature.

30:32

It's also worded as the one who rides

30:34

the clouds, the one who comes with the

30:36

clouds because Baal was a storm deity.

30:39

Baal was considered wonderful because he

30:41

made it rain.

30:43

If you're living in Canaan, you know

30:45

that's in Syria. That's important

30:47

because we like to eat.

30:50

Okay,

30:52

things have to grow. Our cattle like,

30:55

you know, they they like to eat, too.

30:56

So, you know, without rain, we're all

30:58

dead. So, Bale's just this wonderful

31:00

guy. He's the one that traverses the

31:02

heavens in his chariot and gives us

31:05

rain. Okay? No one in antiquity would

31:07

have thought Baal was less than a full

31:10

deity.

31:12

In fact, Baal is a big deal. All over

31:14

the ancient world, even into the Roman

31:16

period, nobody questions Baal's status

31:21

as full deity. Okay, here's why I

31:24

mention it.

31:27

Five times in the Old Testament, the

31:29

biblical writers will take this

31:31

description

31:33

that everybody in the area, everybody in

31:35

the Mediterranean knows is a description

31:37

of Baal, and they will assign it to the

31:40

God of Israel.

31:42

And they do that

31:44

for to do theology. They don't sell

31:47

theology books back in ancient Israel.

31:50

What they do is they take some an idea

31:52

that people are familiar with and then

31:54

they'll take it and say, 'N no, Baal

31:56

isn't the one who controls the reign.

31:58

It's Yahweh of Israel.

32:01

They'll take descriptions and epithets

32:03

and titles and strip them from Baal or

32:06

some other deity and assign them to the

32:08

God of Israel to teach them correct

32:10

theology.

32:12

So here are the here I said five times

32:14

this happens. There's none like God, O

32:17

Jeshan, who rides through the heavens.

32:19

Okay, there's the description. Psalm 68.

32:23

Oh kingdoms of the earth, sing to God.

32:25

Sing praises to the Lord. Silah to him

32:28

who rides in the heavens. Again, that's

32:30

Yahweh. It's not Baal. It's Yahweh.

32:32

Okay. Psalm 104. Bless the Lord, oh my

32:36

soul. Oh Lord, Yahweh, my God, you are

32:38

very great. Down at the end of the line

32:41

here, he makes the clouds his chariot.

32:45

Baal doesn't do that. Baal's just a

32:47

flunky. Okay.

32:50

Psalm 19, an oracle concerning Egypt.

32:53

Behold, the Lord is riding on a swift

32:55

cloud and comes to Egypt

32:58

four times. There's one left

33:03

and we're going to skip that for a few

33:05

minutes. Just want you to know there's

33:06

one left and it's important.

33:09

So God does appear in human form in the

33:12

Old Testament. And this Yahweh figure is

33:15

referred to as the angel, the word, the

33:17

name, the one who came or you know rode

33:19

upon the clouds. And he's

33:21

anthropomorphized

33:23

in several scenes.

33:26

The invisible Yahweh is not diminished

33:28

in these scenes. Now, what what I want

33:30

to get what I want to get into your mind

33:31

is when a Jew read these passages,

33:37

let's go back to Exodus 3. There's two

33:40

in the bush.

33:42

There's the angel and there's God.

33:47

So, they know from the Torah, a lot of

33:49

these passages were from the Torah, that

33:52

this angel is God. But yet, when we read

33:56

back in Exodus 3, which is a really

33:59

important event, the burning bush,

34:02

both the angel, the the Yahweh angel guy

34:06

is in the bush and God's in the bush.

34:10

All right. Now, how do we how do we deal

34:14

with that? So, the the idea, the

34:16

approach they took was that there are

34:18

two Yahwehs.

34:20

One is invisible and transcendent.

34:24

The other one is visible and comes to

34:27

humans as a man to communicate with

34:30

them. Now God can come in other forms.

34:33

Pillar of fire, cloud, whatnot. But most

34:35

of the time he actually shows up as this

34:38

the angel or the word anthropomorphized.

34:43

Okay, the name

34:45

in human form.

34:48

So Jews had no problem teaching the idea

34:52

that there were two Yahwehs. They were

34:55

they were the same, but yet they were

34:56

different. This is how we talk about

34:58

Jesus, is it not? Well, Jesus is God,

35:02

but he's not the father. But that

35:04

doesn't mean he isn't God. He is God,

35:06

but he's not the you have to, you know,

35:09

go through this and try to understand,

35:11

you know, how how you're going to

35:12

articulate this because you have two

35:14

distinct persons. Jesus, God the Father,

35:18

but they're both God.

35:21

This Old Testament stuff

35:24

gives them the conceptual framework as

35:26

Jews to understand the whole Christian

35:30

thing going on about Jesus. Now, they

35:32

have to choose whether they're going to

35:33

believe it or not because of course the

35:35

problem is they they put Jesus on the

35:37

cross. That's like a big boo boo. Okay?

35:39

you know, like if this is real.

35:42

But it it gives them the conceptual

35:44

categories. And the invisible Yahweh,

35:47

the transcendent Yahweh is not

35:49

diminished. He's still God. But you have

35:51

these two figures that intellectually,

35:55

mentally, theologically prepare the way

35:59

for Jesus to come along and say what he

36:02

says or New Testament writers to come

36:04

along and say certain things about Jesus

36:07

that use some of these Old Testament

36:10

passages.

36:12

For instance,

36:13

the most obvious one in the beginning

36:16

was the word.

36:18

The word was with God. The word was God.

36:22

Now, you know, if you take a religion

36:24

101 class, what you're going to get is

36:27

you're going to get some statement about

36:28

how,

36:31

you know, well, John gets his idea of

36:33

the word of the Lord from Platonic

36:35

philosophy. No, he he's reading his Old

36:38

Testament.

36:39

The word of the Lord is God.

36:43

And then the word of the Lord becomes

36:45

flesh and dwelt dwells among us. Jude 5.

36:48

Now I want to remind you although that

36:50

that you once fully knew it that Jesus

36:52

who saved a people out of the land of

36:54

Egypt. Wait a minute.

36:57

God Yahweh

37:00

presence angel. Now we got Jesus.

37:03

Who delivered them from Egypt?

37:06

The answer is yes.

37:08

He's the angel who led them out of Egypt

37:10

to the promised land. He is God in human

37:13

form. This is why Jude's doing it. Now

37:16

there's a textual problem here but again

37:19

just this is just here for effect. The

37:22

angel reading is demonstrabably the best

37:25

reading. And lastly here the name or not

37:28

not lastly got one other

37:30

when when Jesus prays the high priestly

37:33

prayer. I have manifested your name to

37:35

the people whom you gave me out of the

37:37

world. Yours they were. You gave them to

37:39

me. While I was with them I kept them in

37:41

your name. I made known to them your

37:43

name. Here's what Jesus is not saying.

37:46

You know, I I came to earth here so that

37:49

you would all gather around. I got

37:51

something important to say. The name of

37:53

of of your God is Yahweh. Got it?

37:58

Well, they can read that a few thousand

38:00

times in their own Bible. He's not there

38:02

to tell them what God's name is. He's

38:06

there to be the name. Remember what John

38:08

says? He that has seen me,

38:13

Jesus tells, you know, doubting Thomas,

38:15

he that has seen me has seen the father.

38:19

Okay? I have kept them in your name. You

38:21

gave me the name. I made known to them

38:23

your your name because I'm here. Okay?

38:27

I'm you

38:29

rider in the clouds. Here's the fifth

38:31

passage. Daniel,

38:35

one like a son of man comes to the

38:36

ancient of days. Daniel 7. probably are

38:39

very familiar with the passage, the

38:40

ancient of days is seated on a throne.

38:43

One like a son of man, a human one comes

38:45

to him riding on the clouds. This is the

38:48

fifth passage where they use the Baal

38:50

title, except this time they don't use

38:53

it of the God of Israel. The God of

38:55

Israel is the ancient of days.

38:57

There's a second character that gets the

39:00

title. It's the human one. And Jesus

39:05

when he's on trial in front of Caiaphas

39:07

and Caiaphas they're bringing all these

39:09

accusations against him.

39:12

Caiaphas gets says you know you know why

39:14

aren't you saying anything? I adjure you

39:15

by the living God. Tell us if you're the

39:17

Christ the son of God. And Jesus said to

39:19

him you have said so but I tell you from

39:22

now on you'll see the son of man seated

39:24

at the right hand of power and coming on

39:26

the clouds of heaven. Now we think

39:29

that's a clever maybe cryptic

39:30

diversionary answer. But what it is is

39:32

it's both barrels right in his face. You

39:35

want to know who I am, Caiaphas? Pay

39:37

attention.

39:38

And he quotes the cloud rider passage

39:41

from Daniel 7. I'm the one who comes on

39:46

the clouds.

39:48

I'm the second Yahweh. Got it? And

39:51

Caiaphas gets it. Then the high priest

39:54

tore his robes and said, "He has uttered

39:55

blasphemy.

39:57

What further witnesses do we need?"

40:00

It's a death sentence. So to wrap up

40:04

here,

40:05

denial of a godhead,

40:08

contrived New Testament doctrine. No,

40:11

your belief in the in Jesus as God as a

40:16

in a godhead. We we we don't have time

40:18

to go loop in where the spirit, you

40:20

know, factors into this in the Old

40:21

Testament, but your belief in a Godhead

40:24

is not made up by church councils.

40:28

This is biblical theology and it crosses

40:32

both testaments. So the next time you

40:35

know you're you're channel surfing or on

40:37

the internet or doing something on

40:38

Facebook and you get challenged by this,

40:42

you know that the person challenging you

40:45

has a quite deficient knowledge of

40:48

threearters of the Bible

40:51

because that's where it comes from.

40:54

Right? I want to thank everybody. And I

40:57

did remember, let's have the worship

40:59

team come up. [laughter]

41:01

It's the one thing I needed to remember

41:03

today.

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.