Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

17 de julio de 2026

5:59EnglishTranscribed Jul 21, 2026
0:01

[music]

0:06

[music]

0:13

[music]

0:14

The history of philosophy is necessary

0:16

as a theoretical basis from which one

0:18

can reflect on everyday topics

0:21

with concrete elements of judgment.

0:23

However, there is a big difference

0:25

between the formal and historical teaching of

0:28

philosophy and the generation of

0:30

philosophical reflection. In other words,

0:33

teaching history is one thing, and doing

0:36

philosophy is another. [music]

0:37

Doing philosophy.

0:43

[music]

0:44

To do philosophy, one must consider

0:47

strengthening the disposition or

0:49

desire to know, the capacity for wonder.

0:52

If we understand that the capacity for

0:53

wonder is an innate predisposition of

0:56

human beings towards knowledge, something

0:58

like Cartesian inatism, and that

1:00

society, mainly the school, is

1:02

destroying this capacity and

1:05

progressively replacing it with

1:06

concrete data, we can propose a

1:10

philosophical education where

1:12

reasoned discussion and the

1:14

construction of thoughts are privileged.

1:17

[music]

1:23

The new generations are blamed for the

1:26

lack of interest in all the topics that

1:28

adults believe are important.

1:30

However, we see how the system

1:33

privileges stupidity and promotes it

1:35

through television, radio, the

1:37

press, the internet, especially the

1:40

latter, as Professor Santiago

1:42

Bordamalo says in his classes, that ocean of

1:45

information with a depth of 1 centimeter

1:47

that gives us the feeling of

1:49

knowing things while we are only

1:52

informed. And that's saying a lot if

1:54

we trust the information we

1:56

find on the web.

1:58

The truth is that young people are

2:00

bombarded day and night with terabytes of

2:02

misinformation and depersonalization.

2:06

[music]

2:11

Sábato in the resistance expresses his

2:13

concern about this process of

2:15

depersonalization, alienation,

2:17

tantalization. In short,

2:20

stupefaction, if you'll allow me to use

2:22

the term we live in.

2:25

On the one hand, we have been sold the idea of

2:27

progress as a necessary end in

2:29

existence and the possibility of perceiving

2:31

that feeling of progress from

2:34

things that are bought even

2:36

online. They have created in us the need

2:38

to progress and they sell us the objects

2:41

through which we feel we are

2:43

progressing.

2:45

[music]

2:51

[music]

2:55

On the other hand, a reality mentality is being promoted

2:57

. It is thought that

2:59

every event, however insignificant,

3:02

deserves to be shared on

3:04

social media walls. [music] This

3:06

reminds me of the enormous effort with which

3:09

clay tablets were engraved on

3:11

volumes, scrolls, papyrus, and

3:14

stone. That meant that not just any

3:16

nonsense deserved to be published, as the

3:19

idea was to immortalize important experiences and

3:21

reflections. Think before you

3:24

speak, as the grandparents would say.

3:28

[music]

3:34

Thus we find another terrible symptom

3:36

of the lamentable state of health of

3:38

our social body, as

3:39

Hobbs would put it. Immediacy and

3:42

prejudice reign in

3:45

everyday expressions. We suffer from a marked

3:47

confirmation bias. We prioritize

3:50

information that reinforces our position on

3:52

all issues and do not

3:54

allow ourselves to acknowledge the possibility of

3:56

finding the truth. in

3:58

someone else's ideas. We believe we are right and we do

4:01

n't listen to anyone who gives us the

4:03

initial impression of thinking differently.

4:06

But we do not simply remain with an

4:08

attitude of rejection and indifference towards

4:10

those who think differently, but we

4:13

attack them with the sole purpose of

4:15

discrediting them.

4:23

The truth is that this

4:24

societal project that Jaime Garsón spoke of,

4:27

in this savage state, in

4:29

constant war of all against all, from which

4:31

Hobbes flees, it is necessary to reach

4:34

consensus, to build dialogues that

4:36

lead us to understand that each citizen is an

4:38

active part of the

4:40

social conglomerate. We are not necessarily cogs

4:43

in a social machine, but we are

4:46

social beings by nature, which

4:48

leads us to think about how we can

4:50

practice philosophy in the

4:52

Hellenistic style, a concrete and

4:55

applicable philosophy to try to answer a

4:57

question that is still relevant. How to live

5:00

better? How to live better?

5:05

[music] It

5:07

is not the fault of young people that we are

5:09

witnessing an era where

5:11

stupidity surrounds and consumes us, but it is from

5:14

them that

5:16

resistance can be made against this

5:18

socio-historical phenomenon.

5:19

Reflection, then, is not only

5:21

necessary, but urgent. not

5:24

a reflection in the manner of the

5:25

intellectuals of the wasteland, as

5:27

Professor Jorge Ordóñez would say, who only

5:29

seek to appear in the

5:31

provincial showbiz, nor from conferences

5:34

given by doctors, who know everything,

5:36

but that is the only thing they know according to Ócar

5:38

Way, but a reflection close to

5:41

the reality in which we

5:43

develop. We get by.

5:45

[music]

5:51

[music]

5:56

[music]

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.

Get the TLDR of any YouTube video

Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.

Try YouTLDR Free