Taxe petits colis : réponse minable à une guerre mondiale économique !

Hello my friends, I'm going to tell you a story about the small package tax. You will realize that it is much more serious than it seems. I tell you. In 2001, December 2001, China joined the O.M.C. The World Trade Organization. It was in December 2001. A big boom on the economic level. Something extraordinary because the country before had this reputation of being completely isolated and closed to the world.

For a long time, for more than 10 years, this country, what it's going to do, it's going to build babioles, toys for cats, plastic objects, little lasers, keyholes, things like that. So, during this time,

We have a strong deindustrialization in Europe, in the United States, but at the same time we say to ourselves: "It doesn't matter, we will keep the top of the pyramid, we will keep the precious, important things where there is the greatest added value. And then in China, we will leave the trade of the babioles. We have very poorly paid workers held by an iron hand by the Chinese Communist Party. So somewhere, everyone wins.

China will continue this way until... And be careful, there have been technological transfers, know-how, all that.

And we will go fast forward in 2015. In 2015, there is a plan that is launched, which is absolutely extraordinary, which has not made the noise it deserves, but it was a complete break with the past model. In 2015, China launches the plan called "Made in China 2025". What does that mean?

10 years, that means the duration of two five-year plans. The Chinese economy is run in five-year plans. It's a plan that lasts five years. So it gives itself the 13th and 14th five-year plan to reach excellence in 10 top sectors. So there, look, we leave the babioles and we aim for the top sectors. So the top sector is this.

Aerospace, you have noticed that they launched the Comac C919, their line aircraft which is now used on regular lines, it's just a matter of time before they come to compete with Boeing and Airbus. In there, there are 10 sectors, there is medicine, the top tools, so the digital piloting machines and all that.

They targeted medical machines, agricultural machines, new generation agricultural machines, technology. China will trigger this plan. Europe has deplored. Yes, we are deploring, but Europe does not react to these things in general. It plays the defeat directly on these things.

Anyway, if we go back to the themes of astrology, Europe is in favor of losing the economic wars because, quite simply, it wants to deindustrialize itself to lower its carbon footprint, which weighs on the world scale 5.9%, but it wants to bring it to zero to see if it changes anything in the climate. And for that, it is very happy to lose all the economic wars.

We're going to go a little bit fast forward, 2015, we're going to go to 2018. In 2018, China launched the initiative 10,000 Little Giants. It was about creating, in the silage of the Made in China 2025, it was about creating 10,000 PME who will take advantage of this initiative to position themselves in front of the manufacturers. And there, we will see that Germany is targeted.

This means that where you have a German manufacturer, China will put in place, in front of it, dozens, if not hundreds of competitors, who provide the same merchandise

performance equal, better service, lower price. So to break the German market, of course, Germany, the European Union will simply cry. We will arrive in 2019. 2019, for those who remember, there was this crisis on Huawei. Huawei is a big...

big Chinese manufacturers, they make mobile phones, computers, servers, they make network tools like routers, switches, all that. And I remember at the time I was in tech, there was a hysteria here in the United Kingdom, looking in the data center, we had to look literally in the language in the data center, if we didn't leave somewhere, if there is no IWAE switch or something else, and otherwise it was necessary to unplug it immediately and throw it in the electronic trash immediately.

It was of course about protecting Apple. It was about protecting Apple because today you look at Huawei products, it's practically on the same price range, the same quality range as Apple products. You will find objects like, you have the Sort, their system,

which looks like a MacBook but which is lighter, which is very powerful, very fast and which is sold in the same price range. They no longer sell in Babiol, it's really something very expensive and very expensive.

Now, we will continue. The United States is increasingly realizing the danger. Realize that the initiative 10,000 small giants, an initiative because 10,000 small giants, I can tell you in a few years they had gone from 10,000, they wanted 10,000 minimum, they were at 14,000. The last time I checked, they were at 14,000. Today, they must have gone much higher. I noted a few other dates.

2020, the United States is fining SMIC. SMIC is a manufacturer of Chinese semiconductors.

SMI, that's why it's blocked, because it had the capacity, it still has, to send in the cords Intel and AMD. That means it can send in the cords Intel, AMD, even Motorola and others. That means it is able to manufacture microprocessors, very fast, very powerful, flood the market at broken prices. And then these two American companies no longer exist.

That was 2020. Then we will go, there are other small sanctions, perhaps less notable, we will go in 2023. In 2023, the United States prohibits the export of H800 chips to China. It is simply to block them on the artificial intelligence plan. But it is also to protect Nvidia, because Nvidia and other companies, even Akabi,

weighs heavily on the American indices, on the SP500, on the Nasdaq and others. So we don't want these companies to be sent into the ropes by China. So we will have to protect American technology and, among other things, prohibit the export of American technologies to China. And all to avoid that it is copied, that it is dismantled and then replicated. We continue.

In 2024, we will ban, another American sanction that falls, and this time we ban what we call HBMs. HBMs are very strong band-passing memory. And why do the United States do that? Because these memories allow to train models of artificial intelligence.

like Dipsik in China for example because you have the models of the LLM, artificial intelligence and well you have graphics cards with very powerful chips from NVIDIA typically

which will be able to process a lot of data. But be careful, if you don't have memory that can process this data, it's useless to have fast graphics cards if the memory is not available. So there are memories called HBMs, they are faster than DDR and all that, it's another technology.

extremely powerful and there we forbid their trade in China. Why? Because we want to protect Cloud, we want to protect ChatGPT or OpenAI, we want to protect Gemini, etc. We don't want China to be able to access that. So here I am, I'm rolling you out since earlier.

a sort of shadow war, well not shadow, it's an open war, you don't shoot missiles. Speaking of missiles, if you see that for example in 2026, Calas, we can almost say, we are practically in a federated Europe today, almost, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the European Union, who said that China was a cancer and that it needed chemotherapy.

Just to tell you why China is attacking Europe on an economic level. You have to know that. Because, look, even if after the media tried to minimize it by saying, yes, it was taken into context, she talked about cancer and chemistry, then she talked about China, etc. It was mixed up. All I want to say is that when we do diplomacy at this level, when we use in the same context a name of a country like China or another, and we talk about cancer and chemotherapy,

I mean, it's called a "casus belli" on a diplomatic level. It's an aggression. It means that if China had responded with a missile, many people would have found it normal. I mean, you say that a country, you treat it with cancer and you want to provide it with a chemo, you want to treat it with a chemo, you will treat it with a chemo well before it, you see. Especially since Europe has a certain history. When you start treating people like that, you have to know that they can take it to the first degree.

Europe has also declared several times that it wanted to dismantle Russia in a very small state, without any control, and that the next on the list is China. China has not been founded in recent decades with the union on steel and coal. China is still 3,000 years old.

of these 3000 years of documented history. So if we start looking for China, if we want to dismantle it, if it's a cancer, we're going to treat it with a chemo and all, China has the means to make sure that Europe no longer exists. Really. And without firing a shot. They are very powerful, guys. They don't need to threaten or anything. They will execute it directly. So what's going on is that you can see that there is this war.

And then, Europe is happy to lose the economic war. We must not be afraid. It's decarbonizing. China acts as a decarbonizing agent for the European economy. That means that trade is flowing, industries are flowing. And then Europe is very happy to say: "We have less carbon." I told you, Europe is 5.9% of global carbon. But they would like to go to zero to see if it changes anything in the climate. So we arrive in 2026.

And France joined this economic war by saying: "We're going to put the small-sale tax." Where people, men, are discussing

with H800, HBM, as I told you, are talking about planes, engines, satellites, very high speed trains, etc. France arrives, you really feel like someone who arrives at the battle of Stalingrad with a plastic pistol. You see, a pistol, he starts shooting like that with water. It's the impression that it gives.

They arrive in 2026, while the battle, the five-year plan, the two five-year plans are over. China has managed to project itself. So they said 2025, we must master 10 technologies. Well, they master them. The Chinese domestic market today, 99%, for example, precision tools machines that before were brought back from Germany. Today, we no longer need Germany. Today, we manufacture on the spot. We even export them. They were even able to obtain the Russian market and other markets.

In 2025, they have already reached their goal. So now we're going to see what they're going to do for the future. And during this time, you have the France of Macron who is debunking. They have little packages. You will have to see, look. You have a panty, you have a jersey striped, you have a little baby. You have the teenager who brings back resistors to do electronics. Count them, go ahead, we will count them. There are 1, 2, 3 resistors, 4, 5. What is that? It's fuse, it's wire, it's wire to lift.

You look at the mining industry, you see the mining industry in which this battle is located at the level of Europe and at the level of France. So here it is. But you just see the little earth, you realize that frankly, here is the level in which they are today. It's the level of the cannibal, literally. On this level. It's ridiculous, it's grotesque. But here it is, it's like that. They have re-flowed the battery airport with that. Because, quite simply, you have to know one thing, today the logistics chains,

It's literally big screens with guys behind and software and all that. They can just click, draw a line. And behind, when they draw a line, behind you suddenly have a ship that is somewhere in the Atlantic, in the Pacific, in the Indian Ocean, which suddenly will receive a little print. OK, we're going to change the route. He will change the route, he will go to another port. You can have a cargo that is being filled, a plane.

And then we arrive at the commandant's office, "before leaving, we have a small change, you're not going to the airport, you'll see this one." It's as fast as that, even the flight attendants can change planes. You see what I mean? We're not in the 1700s. We can't play like, "well, the diligence goes this way, they have no choice, it's the only way, here it's the castle, here it's the hill, here it's the plain, they have to go this way, we're going to wait for them, we're going to harass them." It's over, all that, it's over.

I'm going to say something about the Chinese. It's not them who invented globalization. Glorious globalization was invented by the West, by the United States, by Europe, etc. And we, at the time, when we spoke against globalization, we took us for Afro-conspirators, we took us for Afro-nationalists, we treated us as far-right, we treated us as all names.

We've been saying for a long time that globalization will return when it's created wrong. Well, here we are today. So now, those who threatened countries with the FMI and others, the World Bank and all that, so that they open their borders, so that they allow the installation of foreign companies, so that they put in place what they called the market economy, these same countries today are putting tariffs, they are putting tariffs.

They change the rules so they can arrange them. When Europe was exporting, the customs barrier was a crime. It's a crime of the Majesty to put a customs barrier. Well, here we are, we lift the customs barrier under threat. The United States went even further, they declared wars, they made colorful revolutions, they dropped regimes to be able to bring their companies into a country.

And today, nobody wants their company and then there are others who replace them with their feet up.

"Oh well, here it is, it's the student who has surpassed the master." You see what I mean? China is not this country, you can say what you want about the country, this country is not the one who invented capitalism, that's it. And even less wild capitalism, except that now he has learned it. He has learned it and now he is using the same soup that was invented by the Westerners. He is making them eat it, except that it is even more spicy than what they did at the beginning. So yes, that's the situation, I just wanted to tell you, and it's pretty...

It's unbearable. I'm going to tell you, I'm starting today, in my analysis, in my vision of things, I'm going to tell you, I think that today, sovereignty, because I learned it a little bit from my dependents, with Brexit. I'm going to tell you why. Because, if you want, 10 years ago, I was thinking that sovereignty was a political sovereignty.

Today, I realize that you can't have political sovereignty if you don't have economic sovereignty. Economic sovereignty is the most important. Once you have your economic sovereignty, once you have economic power, then political and geostrategic power will come on its own. It falls on its own. It's a bonus. You don't even need to do anything to get it. But if you're a country that's unindustrialized,

poor, indebted, that 25% of your population, it's a real figure here, lives under the threshold of poverty. And millions of young people are in depression, they don't have a future. And then you come and yell on the rooftops, yes, we are sovereign. You're sovereign of what? You're sovereign of what?

It's like if an SDF said "I'm sovereign". I'm sovereign on this side of the sidewalk, I'm sovereign on this supermarket box full of trash, I'm sovereign on this sleeping bag that was given to me 15 years ago that is cradled and I sleep in it. You see what I mean? I'm sovereign on that. You're sovereign on nothing at all. You're sovereign on ruins. You want to be sovereign on ruins, yes. But true sovereignty is expressed on the economic level.

That means industries that are out of the output, industries that recruit in bulk, companies that make money, that sell trillions, that people buy from very far away, a territory that interests people, investors, creators who come to your home to invest, to create, to evolve themselves, to come to your economy and go far away. There, yes, there you become a free force.

And there, we respect you anyway. Because today, what we respect is money. It's not flags. It's not flags. You're not going to raise a flag and say: "Yes, it's my flag, we're dead for this flag." Everyone doesn't care. That's has-been. That's the 1900s. You're also with the past. Come back today. Today, what we respect is the economic impact force. That's the real sovereignty. Anyway, thank you my friends. Thank you for listening to this video so far. And we'll see you in the next one.

And then I wanted to tell you that I finished my book. It's the last time I haven't seen much. I'm going to tell you why. Because I was finishing the book "Scrollogy" after. Because as "Scrollogy" does not stop.

I had to make a sequel to the Baccellaire Escrologie. And so it's not a new edition of Escrologie, no. It's the sequel, quite simply. Besides, I can even tell you that it will be released soon, during the month of... I hope, I hope, during the month of July. I hope, by the end of July.

But I can tell you that it is even a little bigger than the first one. So much, so much the files accumulate, so much the continuous horror, the fraudulent failures, the looting of subsidies, the detour, the ideology, all that. There is so much, and frankly, I can tell you at a time when I had to stop. Because if I hadn't stopped, I would have ended with a book twice as big as what I wanted. So here we are. Thank you, my friends. And then we'll see you in the next one. See you soon.