Lefties Losing It: Spain's World Cup hero dons MAGA style cap

It's time for Lefties Losing It. And

let's go to the blue state of Maine

where the Democrats finally got rid of

the Nazi tattoo enthusiast Graeme

Platner after more sexual abuse

allegations were leveled against him.

But you know, you can always trust the

Democrats in Maine to find more weirdo

candidates, including this dude who

claims he has monthly periods through

his rectum. Yes. and he has some great

ideas about how to save money. He calls

it pork bellying.

>> Believe they called it pork bellying by

cutting out the pork belly from all the

bills. I'm sure that would save a lot of

money as well, but

>> I think he means pork barreling, which

kind of means the opposite of what he's

saying there. But don't worry, this guy

has plenty of experience. He is well

equipped to be your next Democrat rep.

Oh, I ran for office several times.

Didn't win, but I didn't run. And then

um I'm a songwriter and then I write my

own books and then I suppose my

transparency. I wouldn't lie to the

people and I wouldn't deceive the people

like we're being deceived right now.

There's plenty I could say there, but

best I move on to a young man doing

God's work by simply asking lefties

questions and then waiting patiently for

them to expose the depths of their

ignorance. Take it away, Frankie Scales.

>> Do you think President Trump is a

fascist?

>> Yes.

>> Why is President Trump a fascist?

>> I'm not sure how to answer.

>> Well, what is fascism?

I'm also not sure, but I know that man

isn't worth the time.

>> Do you think President Trump is a

fascist?

>> Yes.

>> How is President Trump a fascist?

>> Yeah.

>> I don't think it's going to work.

>> Yeah. I don't think it's going to work

either. Your brain that is. Now, good

news. This next lass has studied

fascism. So, you know, she's going to

give us a detailed comprehensive answer.

>> You think President Trump's a fascist?

>> I actually just took a fascism class and

we did not discuss that. But I have my

own thoughts on President Trump.

>> You took a fascism class?

>> I did.

>> What is fascism? Fascism to me is

I I agree with there's like different

definitions there.

Yes, I can.

>> Let me pull it up.

>> Did you Did you find out what fascism

means yet?

>> I know what fascism means, but I'm

trying to give the different definitions

to compare and contrast.

>> Can you give me one definition?

>> No, there's no one definition of

fascism. It's still highly debated among

historians.

>> Can you give me a definition? It's when

you're

>> I actually think I'm done engaging.

>> I'm done engaging. Good call, love. I

think we all lost IQ points watching you

desperately try to articulate just one

point. Let's hear now from one of the

influential young voices of the left,

Hassan Per, who celebrates the murder of

innocent people. He even said America

deserved 9/11. That's a direct quote. So

naturally, he loves Mao. here doors who

was responsible for the deaths of around

80 million people.

>> I got stopped by a cop who thought I was

like making fun of of Mao Dong which I

never would and never will. Ma Dong is a

is a one of the great leaders of of this

world. Okay. A man who changed

the entire universe, the entire planet.

>> Yep. He really said that. Now, that

video resurfaced after Hassan

addressed the College Democrats of

America's National Convention in

Washington over the weekend, and it

seems that his speech was inspired by

another mass murdering dictator. Have a

look at this hot mess. No more to the

fascist reactionaries, but no more to

the Democrats who will collaborate and

cooperate with the fascists, who will

fund ICE, who will fund Israel, who will

help poison the planet, who will stiff

workers and help bosses. We [cheering]

don't need those Democrats anymore.

[applause]

In fact, I KNOW WE have a message. WE

ARE COMING. WE ARE ON BOSS. WE'RE ON

BOUGHT. WE'RE UNBOUNDED. AND WE WILL

BECOME UNDENIABLE.

>> Oh dear. Yeah, he was definitely

channeling one of his fave dictators

there. But it reminded many of this.

>> No more to Trumpism. But no more to the

Democrats who compromise, who

consiliate, and who betray us.

Blood alone moves the wheels of history.

No more to the fascist reactionaries,

but no more to the Democrats who will

collaborate and cooperate with the

fascists.

>> A neverending fight, I say to you, and

you will understand that it is a

privilege to fight.

In fact, I KNOW WE have a message.

[applause]

We are warriors.

>> Yep. The internet remains undefeated.

But let's not just mock this clown.

Let's appreciate how dangerous he is. So

sandp is not some fringe character. He's

been embraced and promoted by Democrat

politicians and mainstream media

including the New York Times. Let's

bring in Sky News contributor Kosha

Gada. Kosha, how do we explain this? Is

it a failure of the education system,

the culture, his parents? How do we have

someone who is that hugely influential

celebrating openly admitting his

admiration for a mass killer?

>> 40 to 80 million deaths Mao was

responsible for

>> I think. Yes. Yes. And yes. It's the

parents. It's the education system. It's

the media. It's the culture. It's the

political class. It's all of it. I guess

you can wrap that all up into culture.

He has upwards of 5 million followers.

So, as you say, not at all fringe across

social media. Prominent Democrats go on

his platform because he has 5 million

followers because there's an audience of

what he has to say. And it's even more

absurd because this whole idea of uh not

saying anything about Mao, but then

simultaneously they say everything about

Hitler. Hitler's become a noun, a verb,

an adjective. Everything's Hitlerian.

Trump was Hitilarian. Doing mass

deportations is Hitlerian. So, they'll

do that on that side. But they're also

virantly anti-Jewish, many of them,

whilst also having this Hitler analogy

for everything.

>> For everything, but not a Mau analogy.

If anything, there's a Mau celebration,

including the fashion, I would note in

there. He he was embracing it. So there

nothing makes sense. There's cognitive

dissonance and paradoxes everywhere. And

uh you know, this is a result of the

culture

>> and he seems to hate the rich, wants

capitalists to be gunned down in the

streets. one of his recent statements,

but he's one of the rich. He lives at a

multi-million dollar property. He's

obviously got significant income from

his media work. Now, let's talk about uh

the left turning on each other in New

York City. Tell me about this clash

between black politicians and activists

and the Democratic socialists who are

being accused of being very vanilla,

very white, and privileged.

Queensborough President Donovan Richards

even accused the DSA of being white

supremacists.

>> This is funny and it's a little bit of a

reprieve because there's been so much

infighting on the right different

issues. So, it's a little bit nice to

see see that on that side as well.

>> Uh it is interesting because this

Donovan uh is an African-American sort

of old school Democrat politician from

from Queensboro. Meanwhile, you you see

what's ascendant on the left of course

is Mani A. You see that whole ilk they

are ascendant. They are popular. He's

become a kingmaker. We've talked about

this before in the New York elections.

Everybody that Mandani backed won and

defeated hand

>> absolutely these uh establishment types

very wellunded people. That happened to

them. AOC herself her rise many years

ago she defeated uh one of the highest

ranking traditional Democrats in the

party. So that is there. And I think the

the African-American contingent of the

traditional Democrat party doesn't love

it. Even though Mandani and AOC are not

white,

>> now they're complaining how, well,

you're not really African-American or

for the descendants of the slaves.

Initially, that was always what the core

black group was about, even though it's

all been diluted. And uh they're trying

to see if they can use that to their

advantage and calling them white

supremacists. Uh I don't think it's

going to work, but I think it's maybe an

appeal to the black base of the Democrat

party, which is still very strong, big

part of the electorate. It swings the

math. Yeah.

>> And maybe that's on some level what this

is about. That can drive a wedge to gain

back some political favor with these

guys.

>> And it is the most uh loyal supporter

base for the Democrats by a long margin.

You've got something like nine in 10

black votes going to the Democrats.

>> No other group does that.

>> No other group comes close to that. even

stronger amongst Democrat women,

Democrat men in the age of Trump have

slowly gone uh for for Republicans, but

still overwhelmingly Democrats. So, does

do they feel entitled to greater

representation? Sure, you've got people

who are certainly not white like Mamani

and AOC, but as you said, they're not

African-American either.

>> No. And they're very elite actually. And

we've talked about Mandani's background.

He's a complete elite. his mother is a

filmmaker and you know he's done all

these interesting things. So he's not

really representative of that. He can

package himself in that way and he he

wears a D for the Democrat party uh

label. So a lot of that group will just

vote based on party lines. So he's

taking advantage of that and I don't

know how far this Queensboro president

is going to get. But I think it's an

interesting signal of that rift in on

the left.

>> Well, this is the thing though. When you

vote Democrat that consistently in those

numbers, you're going to get taken for

granted. they're actually not going to

be serving your community because they

know those votes are going to come. As

long as you see the D, you're going to

vote for it. Now, I'm going to get back

to more US issues, but I am interested

in your take on what Pauline Hansen

spoke about at CPAC in London, where she

called Australians stupid for not

banning the burka. It follows Denmark's

decision to ban burkas in schools and

universities as part of a plan to tackle

what it calls parallel societies.

Denmark has some of the toughest

migration laws in Europe. They

previously introduced rules compelling

asylum seekers and their children to

learn Danish or lose their benefits.

Kosha, this is a debate that comes up

once every couple of years in this

country. We don't have a enormous

population who wears burkers or

knickabs.

So to me that should mean that it should

be easier to ban them and whether you're

doing it on security grounds or whether

you're doing it on assimilation grounds

and saying these are dehumanizing

garments and uh they're anti-women and

we're not going to tolerate it in our

society. But every time it's brought up

the whole issue is is discussed in terms

of racism and bigotry and we forget

about it and it comes around again a

couple of years later.

>> You're right. It is such an easy win

because the numbers are small, it's

probably a 9010 issue if you looked at

the population today, but as the

immigration mathematics change

>> when it goes from 9010 to 8020, as that

contingent of people who do wear that

and come from those cultures gets to a

certain critical mass, it gets harder.

So, it really is a closing window to do

that. Uh, the Scandinavians are always

surprising because it's pretty left-wing

progressive place. But every now and

then, you know, they they'll show sparks

of this kind of thing on this issue on

uh the whole trans and and gender thing.

They were interesting on that lockdown.

Sweden didn't do that. So like there

there's an interesting precedent to look

at from countries that are otherwise

very progressive. But of course with

with all due respect to Pauline Hansen

because she's one of the strongest

people on this issue,

>> the more uh dramatic thing would be to

not have asylum seekers and actually

have a moratorium on immigration or

really tighten the laws in the first

place so that then you don't have to

worry about how do we assimilate those

people once they're here. But uh this is

a stepping stone to to that position

which she has been one of the more

consistent on. Now, let's get back to US

issues. The attacks against the vice

president have been coming in thick and

fast since his uh appearance on Joe

Rogan and his comments about Jeffrey

Epstein's links to intelligence agencies

and kosher. They were even claiming his

absence during the World Cup was a sign

he was on the outer with President

Trump. Rubio was with President Trump

for the World Cup final. But JD Vance

had a very good excuse for not being

there. He was with his wife Usher who

gave birth to their fourth child. In a

joint statement, they wrote, "We're

excited to announce that our baby boy,

Alec Neil Vance, was born this morning.

Usher and the baby are happy and

healthy, and our kids are overjoyed to

meet their little brother." Kosha, it

has been really interesting to see uh

that split in in support from the right

and some of very loud voices are

speaking out against JD Vance. They

didn't like what he had to say on Joe

Rogan's program. They don't like the

fact that he's um really leading the

negotiations with with Iran, a task he

President Trump has given him. How do

you see this? because I can't imagine he

would have gone on Joe Rogan and said

what he said

without President Trump's approval. I

don't think he would have said anything

there that would have surprised or

disappointed President Trump.

>> Yeah, he's been always walking this

tight rope a little bit cuz he comes

from that MAGA populist mold. We've

discussed the Iran war has not been

popular with that base. He's very loyal.

So he has to kind of walk that line of

how to stay true to his positions, his

platform as somebody who's very likely

going to run and is still the front

runner for 28 while not being disloyal

or second guessing his boss in public,

which is understandable. I know there

are some who say he should have done

that, but I think it's understandable

why he wouldn't. And uh he is an

excellent communicator. He can go and do

a 4-hour Joe Rogan podcast and riff and

bob and weave and cover those things and

and kind of walk that tight rope. Um, I

always get the sense that Trump probably

isn't micromanaging per se what he can

say or can't say, and he's sort of

somebody who likes everybody being out

in the arena, whether it's him, whether

it's Rubio.

>> Duke it out. Let the chips fall where

they may. He himself famously defeated

17 Republicans or whatever it was in

2016.

>> But yes, in general, I think he Trump is

happy to have that sort of fight,

healthy tension, if you will, in the

party and let the voters decide. Uh

clearly we are already in the cycle of

2028. Even though we're on the side of

the midterms, it has begun.

>> Absolutely. And he really isn't giving

much away, President Trump in who he

would prefer. He said he wants them to

run together. They get along so well,

but that's going to be highly unlikely.

And if it is, if they are going to run

together, well then there's no chance JD

Vance is going to be running as VP. It's

going to be

>> uh so yeah, let we we'll see what

happens there. But there are a lot of

people writing off JD Vans and I think

that's uh a mistake.

>> Foolish. Absolutely a mistake. Now let's

stick with the World Cup. Much of the

leftist media have been left dazed and

confused throughout the whole

tournament. They were confused by the

outpouring of patriotism. They were

confused by people by around the world

coming to America and actually loving

it. And the bizarro media coverage

continues with this from Politico. The

headline reads, "Climate ambitions

shrink at America's World Cup." Politico

notes that uh on uh 2022, Qatar made a

pledge to host the first carbon neutral

World Cup, but now limiting climate

pollution is no longer a goal. They

write the 2026 men's World Cup could be

the most emissions intensive tournament

in the events history. Kosher, I mean,

this is laughable. Qatar was basically

building stadiums using slave labor and

these clowns are worried about carbon

footprints. I mean, come on.

>> That was so funny. It's sort [laughter]

of like the the position is there and

you've got to fit the story into it. And

that's the story of the World Cup is the

the carbon footprint of this one versus

the last one. So, uh, and it's funny

because they don't know, they're not in

on the joke. Like, whoever wrote that

and the editors and everybody up the

chain probably sincerely believe it. And

>> Oh, yes. and and they sincerely believe

that the average uh soccer fan really

cares about that as well. Now, before

you go, I want to ask you about this

trend. It was noted by the Wall Street

Journal. They report that more than half

a century after Watergate, conservative

youth are re-examining the late Richard

Nixon.

Tell me about this trend. I find this

fascinating because I've got to admit my

own ignorance about that period. what I

thought I knew, the popular media

narrative and what actually happened

were two very different things. The uh

and and when I did a bit of a deep dive

into uh that whole saga, I came out with

a very different opinion on Nixon. And

it's interesting that a lot of young

conservatives are also having that

journey.

>> It was a great find um to cover in this

segment because yes, he he was very

popular. He won in a landslide. It was

the ultimate landslide and then this

scandal happens and all the pressure and

he rushed to resign the only one who did

in that way and then the media packages

and wraps and sells that story for a

generation and there's a certain

understanding that becomes part of just

a collective memory from it. Now you add

to that what's happened especially with

young people that there is social media

and for all its flaws it is a

democratized medium and you can get

access to different viewpoints and

independent voices and all of that more

than you could back when that scandal

happened. And then you also add the fact

that sadly trust in institutions is at

an all-time low especially with the

young folks and they're questioning

everything. Some of it's going to be

interesting. They're requesting World

War II and who are the good guys and who

are the bad guys and what happened like

all of that. So there's a complete swirl

of things, but in there there will be

nuggets like this and people JFK's

assassination, MLK's assassination,

Charlie Kirk's assassination, all of

those things. There's just so much

skepticism and I think that uh lends

itself to this where now people are just

questioning every story and it from a

different life and times of Martin

Luther King is another one that is

fascinating the re-examination of that

and some of the information that's

coming to light now decades after the

event. Kosha Gator, thank you so much

for your time.

>> Pleasure. Now, after America helps

showcase the best World Cup in living

memory, all the left wants to do is to

stoke division and they're not above

using deceptively edited clips and

straight out lies. Now, one of the big

lies during the rounds at the moment is

that Spanish star Lima snubbed President

Trump and refused to shake his hand. And

they also claimed that Pedro Porro

celebrated with the Palestinian flag

wrapped around his shoulder. Both lies.

Watch this.

>> Wow.

>> 46.

>> Now, did Spain just put the Philistine

flag around their neck and lift the

World Cup?

Watch this. Watch it. Watch.

Now, this next clip isn't fake. It

features Spain's World Cup hero, Ferane

Torres, who scored the winning goal in

the 1-nil victory over Argentina. Here

he is celebrating in style with fans in

Madrid while wearing a Make Spain Great

Again hat. This is going to trigger the

lefties internationally.

>> [music]

>> Joining me now is broadcaster Dee Dun

Levy. Dee, have you already got World

Cup withdrawal? Are you grateful it's

over?

>> I'm an early riser, so I've actually

enjoyed having something to watch when I

come down in the morning. Um, look, I I

think there was a lot of AI generated

slop that came out of the World Cup. The

worst was Harland. There was a clip of

him in a restaurant.

>> Oh, the one with when he's eating and he

looks at his own reflection and gets

shocked. Yeah, that was obviously fake,

but so many fell for that one.

>> But it had 30 million views on its first

day and even when people knew it was

fake, it still got millions and millions

more as well. In the case of Laminal and

the scene where apparently he didn't

shake Donald Trump's hand. You know,

someone's clearly trying to generate a

bit of anti-Trump controversy there.

>> And what they don't realize is that's

reflected more poorly on the athlete

than it has on Donald Trump. Because in

anyone's books, it's rude to not shake

the hand of the president of the host

nation. So it made the poor young man

bad. It show just shows you the left

will stop at nothing to make their

point. They they'll crush anyone in

order to try and get, you know, have a a

go at Donald Trump.

>> Absolutely. And they've also got this uh

new lie about they've cropped out Trump

from the image when they're all on stage

and celebrating when if you actually

look at it, Trump and the FIFA officials

walk off stage and that's when the

picture was taken. So no one's been

cropped out. They've just taken the

picture of the team as you would expect.

Now, staying with the World Cup, singer

Robbie Williams, who performed in the

pre-match, has gone viral after this

interview on German TV. Have a look

here. During the interview, something is

seen falling out of his nose or mouth,

which he then uh picks up off the

microphone and places on his forehead

for the rest of the interview.

[laughter]

Wonder what that could be. Well, the

singer has uh clarified the object was

just a mint and he's apologized to

viewers.

>> It was deeply unprofessional

and um people worried about me. Uh but

it's okay cuz I had several more.

>> DD, are you buying that? Am I being far

too cynical?

>> Yes, I think you are. I think it seems

[laughter] absolutely plausible that

it's if you see it slowed down, it's

coming out of his mouth, not his nose.

And as if he would if it was, you know,

people think it's cocaine that he's

going to put it up on his forehead. It's

ridiculous.

>> Perhaps if you're on enough cocaine,

that seems like a good idea.

>> I feel really sorry for Robbie Williams.

I mean, he's been really open about

[laughter] his struggles with drugs and

cocaine in particular. And

>> has he? See, I'm not even aware of that.

I'm just thinking he's a rock star. What

else are they going to be doing?

>> No. Well, he has. and he's talked about

the toll that it took on his life. And I

think it seems unfair on the strength of

a clip that's a few seconds that's

debatable to to judge his sobriety on

that. And I can

>> This is why we have Diddy Dun Levy here.

[laughter] Just to bring a modicum of

sense.

>> You're in a silly mood.

>> I am in a silly mood cuz the World Cup's

over and I'm don't know what I'm going

to do with myself. Now I need to get

your thoughts on this clip. This has

gone viral. One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce

appearing on the ABC 7:30 report. And my

god, just watch.

>> You're defending your leader, but are

you really comfortable with where she is

taking you?

>> I I think Sit down.

>> Sorry, it's a dog,

>> Dy. That is going to be an alltime great

clip perhaps in the league of this

incredible moment in Australian TV

history. You know, people are entitled

to the sexual proclivities, [laughter]

you know. I mean, let there be a

thousand blossoms bloom as far as I'm

concerned, [laughter] you know, but I

ain't spending any time on it because in

the meantime, every 3 months, a person

is torn to pieces by a crocodile in

North Queensland.

>> Of course, that was Bob Kata talking

about same-sex marriage and crocodiles.

Uh, how do we explain that clip? Uh

we've we've talked about the Bobcat one

previously, but the Barnaby Joyce one

cuz we couldn't even hear the dog

barking, but apparently it was barking

throughout the interview and obviously

>> Yeah.

>> Uh getting on his nerves. People are

genuinely outraged and it says more

about our outrage culture than it does

about that he yelled at the dog did.

Well, I think that a lot of people need

to go down to their local park and see

how dogs communicate with each other.

They bark at each other. They growl. And

that's what he did. Look, it looked like

it, you know, he snapped. He lost his

cool for a moment there. But I don't

look if there was any credible evidence

that he was, you know, mistreating the

dog, which there isn't, then I think

everyone would be right to be outraged.

But I'd imagine anyone for

>> If you can't yell at your own dog to be

quiet, then you know what sort of a

country have we become?

>> Exactly. Uh, now Channel 7 has claimed

victory after a massive ratings win on

Sunday night, thanks primarily to their

interview with One Nation leader Pauline

Hansen. Going head-to-head with Channel

9's 60 Minutes, Channel 7's Spotlight

drew an average of 753,000 viewers

compared to 60 Minutes which had around

500,000 viewers. Dee uh the One Nation

leader though isn't too happy. She says

she was stitched up by Channel 7. Well,

either way, it just shows us she's a

massive draw card and she's been

marginalized by the media elites and by

the political class. And yet, there's

obviously huge appetite amongst

Australian people to hear what she has

to say. Whether you love her or hate

her, at least let her speak. Let people

listen. Australians aren't dumb. But she

was apparently told that they wanted to

do

>> a story on unchecked migration, mass

migration, the impact it's having. M

>> perhaps they said that to get her over

the line to agree to the interview. But

that that's not what they produce.

That's not at all the product that they

put to wear.

>> No, but more full her if she thought she

was going to be asked one thing and she

was asked something different. I think

if you're going agreeing to an

interview, then you have to front up to

whatever questions are put to you. But I

think that social media is the reason

that Pauline Hansen has grown in

popularity because instead of the media

just telling people Pauline's a nut and

here's a here's a crazy clip of her just

saying something crazy, they're actually

able to see her on her own social media

that she she does have sensible things

to say and she does make good points.

People aren't dumb. They can see through

the

>> they can see through that. But given the

manner in which they presented that, not

just the interview, but the interactions

at the Islamic school with the kids, it

was a whole bunch of things happening

there. Do you think the person who's on

the fence would come out of that with a

positive view of Pauline Hansen or are

they going to sort of fall for the media

spin there? No, I think people are

appreciating her honesty and her

what's the word I'm looking for?

>> There's a rawness about her. She's not a

polished political

>> uh product, is she?

>> And she has her principles and she

sticks to those and she'll she'll

persist with a point of view. And I

think it's similar to Carl Stefanovic

that people are appreciating that he's

standing by things that he's saying. And

whether you, like I said a moment ago,

if you like or hate Pauline Hansen, you

have to admire the strength of her

character. So I I don't think any harm

was done at all in that interview.

>> She's been the same person for 30 plus

years uh in the public eye, and you

can't say that about too many

politicians. Dei Dun Levy, thank you so

much for your time. That's right.