Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Proyecta Cato

3:37:16EnglishBy UCatolicaCuencaTranscribed Jul 16, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
0:00

their future professionals. Our

0:02

Students are prepared for

0:04

to project what will one day be

0:06

the future of architecture and design in

0:08

our city and the world.

0:10

These are ideas that inspire projects that

0:12

They are building tomorrow. They are the best.

0:14

academic.

0:15

Project Cato 2026. Come and learn about

0:17

designs that originate in their city.

0:22

Heart, heart.

0:24

In the heart of Cuenca, ideas take shape

0:27

form and the historic center becomes

0:30

in the perfect space for projection.

0:32

Architecture, design and culture

0:34

intertwine in a dialogue that awakens

0:36

in the genity, serving as a canvas for

0:38

the most visionary ideas.

0:40

Our university seeks to ensure that the

0:42

Students, don't leave your designs in a

0:44

computer. encourages and creates spaces

0:47

so that students can present their

0:48

projects in an iconic location and the

0:51

Cuenca residents and the world to discover it. A

0:53

It's a sample so everyone can see the

0:55

talent of their future professionals.

0:57

Our students are prepared

0:59

to project what at some point

1:02

It will be the future of architecture and design.

1:04

in our city and in the world.

1:06

These are inspiring ideas, projects that

1:08

They are building tomorrow. They are the best.

1:10

academic.

1:11

Project Cato 2026. Come and learn about

1:13

designs that originate in your city.

1:21

Working with spacing

1:27

We are Cato Heart.

1:50

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

1:54

Let's make history, a new era.

1:58

It is our mission

2:01

and our elon.

2:04

You will fly as high as a red eagle.

2:07

We will expel you at all costs. Tea

2:12

will stop.

2:13

Together we will achieve it.

2:17

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there.

2:22

and you decline. We are red eagles and you

2:27

This victory belongs to everyone.

2:31

We are so much heart.

2:34

We are going to live our mission to arrive

2:38

far away by the old

2:44

are

2:45

heart, heart, and nothing enters our

2:50

vision with work, with effort and

2:53

passion.

2:57

We rose again together and grew so much.

3:00

We changed history, we wrote it

3:03

all. Now it's your turn so much and I'm sure it

3:07

You're going to achieve it.

3:10

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

3:15

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

3:20

This victory belongs to everyone.

3:24

We are heart, heart, we will live

3:29

Our mission is to serve

3:37

we are songs heart heart nothing

3:41

will stop our vision with work, with

3:46

effort and passion

3:50

We are song, heart.

4:13

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

4:17

Let's make history, a new era

4:21

It is our mission.

4:24

and our hope.

4:27

You will fly as high as a red eagle.

4:30

We will expel you at all costs. Nothing

4:36

Together we will achieve it.

4:40

We will be a part of your life. The

4:44

we will crossbow

4:45

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

4:50

This victory belongs to everyone.

4:54

We are heart to heart. Let's air our

5:00

mission to go far for the well producers

5:08

heart, heart, and nothing enters our

5:13

vision. With work, with effort and

5:16

passion.

5:20

We rose again together and grew so much.

5:23

We changed history, we wrote it

5:26

all. Now it's your turn

5:29

And I'm sure you'll achieve it.

5:33

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

5:38

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

5:43

This victory belongs to everyone.

5:47

We are heart, heart, we will live

5:52

our mission

5:55

the winding earth

6:00

We are songs, heart, heart, and nothing.

6:04

will stop our vision with work, with

6:09

effort and passion

6:13

we are each heart.

6:36

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

6:40

Let's make history, a new era

6:44

It is our mission.

6:47

And our hope

6:50

You will fly as high as a red eagle.

6:53

We will support you at all costs. Nothing to you

6:57

will stop.

6:59

Together we will achieve it.

7:03

We will be a part of your life.

7:08

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

7:13

This victory belongs to everyone.

7:17

We are heart to heart. We're going to open

7:22

our mission to go far by

7:25

old

7:30

are

7:31

heart heart and nothing

7:35

Our vision through work and effort

7:39

and passion.

7:43

We rose again together and grew so much.

7:46

We changed history, we wrote everything.

7:50

Now it's your turn, and you're sure to...

7:54

achieve.

7:56

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

8:01

If you decline like red eagles and you

8:06

This victory belongs to everyone.

8:10

We are heart, heart, we will live

8:15

our mission of solidarity

8:23

we are songs heart heart nothing

8:27

will stop our vision with work with

8:32

This is my passion

8:36

we are song heart

8:59

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

9:03

Let's make history, a new era.

9:07

It is our mission

9:10

and our evasion.

9:13

You will fly as high as a red eagle.

9:16

We will expel you at all costs. Nothing to you

9:20

will stop.

9:22

Together we will achieve it.

9:26

We will be a part of your life.

9:31

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

9:36

This victory belongs to everyone.

9:40

We are heart and soul and we are going to open

9:45

our mission to go far by

9:48

old consumer

9:54

heart, heart, and nothing enters our

9:59

vision with work, with effort and

10:02

passion

10:06

We rose again together and grew so much

10:09

We changed history, we wrote to him

10:12

all. Now it's your turn and I'm sure you'll do it

10:17

to achieve.

10:19

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

10:24

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

10:29

This victory belongs to everyone.

10:33

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

10:37

Living our mission comes

10:41

the following

10:46

we are songs heart heart nothing

10:50

will stop our vision with work with

10:54

This passion

10:59

we are heart

11:22

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

11:26

Let's make history, a new era

11:29

It is our mission

11:33

and our evasion.

11:36

You will dwell as high as a red eagle.

11:39

We will expel you at all costs.

11:43

Nothing will stop you.

11:45

Together we will achieve it.

11:49

We will be a part of your life. We will crossbow

11:54

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

11:59

This victory belongs to everyone.

12:02

We are heart and soul and we're going to fly

12:08

our mission to go far by

12:11

old

12:16

are

12:17

heart heart and nothing

12:21

Our vision through work and effort

12:25

and passion

12:29

We rose again together and grew so much

12:32

We changed history, we wrote everything.

12:36

Now it's your turn

12:38

And I'm sure you'll achieve it.

12:42

We will be a part of your life. We will be there and

12:47

deas

12:50

red. Ladies and gentlemen, very good

12:53

days with everyone present. We give them

12:56

a warm welcome to

12:58

Proyectacato, a space where the

13:00

architecture, design, innovation and

13:03

creativity is found for

13:05

share ideas, experiences and new

13:08

ways of thinking about our cities and the

13:11

spaces we inhabit. We greet the

13:14

authorities who are with us on this

13:16

tomorrow. Enrique Pozo Cabrera, Chancellor

13:19

from the Catholic University of Cuenca.

13:22

Agustín Borja Pozo, rector of the

13:24

Catholic University of Cuenca. Vanessa

13:27

Bermeo Pasmiño, Vice-Rector of

13:29

teaching. Rafael García Abad,

13:31

Vice-Rector of Research and

13:33

innovation. Marcelo Aguilera Crespo,

13:35

Vice-Rector General. Santiago Moscoso

13:38

Bernal, dean of the Faculty of

13:40

Engineering, Industry and Construction.

13:43

Rafael Borja Pozo, sub-dean of the

13:45

faculty.

13:47

We extend this greeting to our

13:49

Dear career directors

13:51

teachers, guest professionals,

13:54

representatives of the different

13:56

public and private institutions.

13:58

Dear students and public in

14:00

general,

14:02

to begin with this important

14:04

space, we invited Rafael Borja,

14:07

sub-dean of the faculty, who will have

14:09

his position, the welcoming remarks and

14:11

He will tell us about the Cato 2026 project.

14:35

Good morning everyone, sir

14:38

Chancellor, Rector, Gentlemen

14:41

vice-rectors,

14:42

deans.

14:44

President of the College of Architects of

14:46

the Suay,

14:48

Dean of the Faculty of the University

14:51

of the Americas of UDLA. Welcome.

14:57

It is a true honor for me.

14:59

to give you the warmest welcome to the

15:01

Proyectato inauguration.

15:05

Proyectacato is an academic celebration,

15:07

an academic celebration that begins with a

15:10

Very simple question.

15:13

How can we train better architects?

15:16

for a better city? And that led us

15:20

to a concern.

15:23

How to avoid academic inbreeding in

15:26

Architecture?

15:30

That tendency to think that the one who

15:32

only from our own classrooms

15:35

we understood that architecture cannot

15:37

to be built only between

15:38

architects,

15:40

but needs to dialogue with the

15:42

citizenship.

15:44

I think that was very clear to him

15:46

Pichincha College of Architects in

15:48

the last

15:50

in the last competition he held in the

15:52

museum of Ecuador. Philip Johnson

15:57

He also told us that architecture is

15:59

the only art

16:01

that is imposed on people.

16:04

And it's true because if I go to Paris and

16:07

I want to see the Mona Lisa, it's my decision

16:09

Enter or not enter Lubre.

16:11

But if I build a building on my

16:13

city, I'm going to have it every day

16:15

that visualize.

16:18

And so, among some friends, many

16:21

young people, and others not so young,

16:24

We talked and created dynamics.

16:27

We created several projects, including

16:31

We created the contest, the first contest

16:33

from Cator Render, which left us with pleasant memories

16:36

memories, like the lady who us

16:39

He asked us to explain

16:42

Why did the tree cross in the render?

16:43

And it wasn't that the tree crossed the

16:45

render, but the render was framed and

16:48

the background architecture with the

16:49

nature of the beginning.

16:53

A forum was held where we brought together the

16:57

largest real estate developers in the country,

17:00

much controversy between them, but

17:02

developed in the best way and

17:04

They debated and an academy was created for

17:06

our students.

17:10

We created the summit

17:12

and the first Acato project was created, which

17:15

He also left us

17:17

many beautiful experiences with the

17:19

citizenship because we already adhere to the

17:21

citizens believing that all these

17:23

events

17:26

It's for our students and the only one

17:27

so that it is useful for our students

17:29

It's so they can get their feedback

17:31

with the products we take out cycle to

17:33

cycle.

17:35

and one of the ladies wanted to take the

17:37

project of one of our

17:38

students that were 10,000 m² of

17:42

construction and she wanted to build them

17:44

on a plot of land measuring 5 by 10 m².

17:48

In the second and last Cato project

17:52

a foreigner, I don't know exactly where he was from

17:55

He was the young man, but he found some

17:59

aura, any theory outside of this

18:02

universe and explained a whole bus that

18:05

He came with the theory that

18:07

He found it in that project.

18:11

And so we collected several

18:13

very enriching experiences for

18:16

our students, which gives them the endorsement to

18:18

they of the knowledge that go

18:20

acquiring cycle by cycle, and that this is

18:22

for the city of Cuenca and for the

18:24

Ecuador. That's Proyectacato, it's a

18:27

academic celebration and it's for you

18:30

students. Thank you so much.

18:42

We appreciate the valuable input of

18:44

our sub-dean. Next

18:46

We will listen to the message of whomever

18:48

represents the talent and commitment of

18:50

our students. We invite you

18:52

Valeria Maya, representative of the

18:54

winners of Proyecta Cato 2025.

19:10

If I had to summarize my experience in

19:13

Cato's project in a single word would be

19:15

fear.

19:17

To be honest, at the beginning everything was a

19:19

chaos. There were high expectations, there were

19:21

many insecurities and many doubts. Me

19:24

I kept asking if my project

19:26

It was good enough. Besides,

19:29

when you see the level of others

19:30

participants, it's inevitable to compare yourself

19:33

and feel that maybe you're not the

19:34

height.

19:36

But that's precisely where it all began

19:37

true learning.

19:40

Participating in this contest made me

19:41

to understand that Proyecta Cato is not just

19:43

a competition,

19:45

It's an opportunity to put into

19:46

put into practice everything you learn in the

19:48

classrooms, to discover, to discover what

19:50

that we are capable of when we work with

19:53

commitment and dedication.

19:56

The biggest lesson I take away from

19:58

This project is about perseverance.

20:01

I learned that good design doesn't always

20:04

It doesn't appear on the first or second try.

20:06

A project needs time, it needs

20:09

If he makes a mistake, he needs to change and

20:11

to start over and above all to trust in

20:13

the process.

20:15

We often believe that ideas don't

20:17

They work, but every correction we make

20:19

It makes us get a little closer to

20:21

what we are looking for. I also learned

20:24

to listen to the observations of our

20:26

teachers, who are our

20:27

mentors, although sometimes it's difficult

20:29

accept criticism. I understood that each

20:32

The comment was an opportunity to

20:33

improve.

20:35

Thanks to this process, not only did the

20:37

project, I also grew up with it.

20:40

I want to thank my colleagues

20:43

as a team where we share stress and doubts

20:46

and also satisfaction. Thank you for your

20:48

commitment, for the ideas they contributed,

20:50

for supporting each other and for showing

20:52

at work that the work in

20:55

The team always delivers results

20:57

be better.

20:59

I think these kinds of experiences

21:00

They greatly enrich our

21:01

training because it teaches us to

21:03

to face our challenges, to

21:06

to defend our ideas, to trust in

21:07

our capabilities. These are lessons.

21:10

that will not accompany us throughout

21:11

our professional life.

21:13

Finally, I want to invite everyone

21:15

students who are interested in participating

21:17

in the next editions of Project

21:18

I obey. Don't be afraid to try.

21:21

Dare to trust in ideas, learn

21:23

in the process and enjoy each stage.

21:26

In the end, beyond the result, what

21:28

We're really going to take everything with us.

21:30

that we learn along the way. Many

21:32

thank you.

21:40

We thank Valeria Maya for her

21:43

words. To hold the inauguration

21:45

As the official of this meeting, we invite you to

21:47

Agustín Borja Aposo, rector of the

21:49

Catholic University of Cuenca, who

21:51

will address the attendees and declare

21:53

This academic event is now open.

22:03

Good morning to everyone. Do

22:06

mine are the vocatives of our teacher of

22:08

ceremony.

22:10

I want to begin by thanking

22:12

our special guests who have

22:15

given the time to come here to Proyecta

22:18

Cato to look and observe what she does

22:22

Catholic University of Cuenca, which is

22:25

fulfill its objective of transcending and

22:27

transform cities through

22:30

academy. the academy that is dedicated today

22:35

to look for peaceful cities, more peaceful cities

22:38

human through the integration of

22:40

our substantive functions, through

22:42

through scientific research

22:44

through formative research

22:47

from teaching.

22:49

Today we are in this space, in this

22:52

space for growth, in this space

22:54

where we want to show the world what

22:56

It is the Catholic University of Cuenca,

22:58

but also to bring the best of the world

23:01

for our students. These are the

23:03

spaces where we generate the true

23:05

critical thinking of our

23:07

students and through that I want

23:09

Congratulations to the Faculty of Engineering,

23:12

Industry and Construction to generate

23:14

These spaces year after year. My

23:15

Congratulations, Mr. Dean. With these

23:19

I want brief and heartfelt words

23:20

declare this event inaugurated. Many

23:23

thank you.

23:32

We appreciate the valuable input of

23:34

our rector. Officially

23:37

We have inaugurated Proyecta Cato.

23:39

We hope these days will be a

23:41

opportunity to learn, share

23:43

knowledge, generate new connections

23:46

and continue building the future of

23:48

architecture and design. In a few minutes

23:50

minutes we will begin the block of

23:52

conferences. Thank you for your presence.

23:54

Thank you so much.

24:03

Our mission to go far by

24:06

old

24:11

We are heart and soul and nothing else

24:16

Our vision through work and effort

24:20

and passion.

24:23

We rose again together and grew so much.

24:27

We changed history, we wrote everything.

24:30

Now it's your turn so much

24:33

And I'm sure you'll achieve it.

24:37

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

24:42

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

24:47

This victory belongs to everyone.

24:50

There are so many of us, heart to heart, let's go

24:55

to live our mission from afar

25:04

We are songs, heart, heart, and nothing.

25:08

will stop our vision with work, with

25:12

space

25:17

we are each heart.

25:40

The time has come for you not to be your goal.

25:44

Let's make history, a new era

25:47

It is our mission.

25:51

And our hope

25:53

You will fly as high as a red eagle.

25:57

We will support you at all costs.

26:00

Nothing will stop you.

26:03

Together we will achieve it.

26:07

We will be a part of your life. We will crossbow

26:12

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

26:17

This victory belongs to everyone.

26:20

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

26:24

Open our mission to go far by

26:29

the old eaves

26:34

We are heart and soul and nothing else

26:39

Our vision through work and effort

26:43

and passion

26:46

We rose again together and grew so much.

26:50

We changed history, we wrote everything.

26:53

Now it's your turn to do everything, and I'm sure you will.

26:58

achieve.

27:00

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

27:05

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

27:10

This victory belongs to everyone.

27:13

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

27:18

to live our mission, to go far

27:23

stitches

27:26

We are songs, heart, heart, and nothing.

27:31

will stop our vision with work, with

27:35

effort and passion

27:40

We are heart.

28:03

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

28:07

Let's make history, a new era

28:10

It is our mission.

28:13

and our evasion.

28:16

You will dwell as high as a red eagle.

28:20

We will support you at all costs. Nothing to you

28:24

will stop.

28:26

Together we will achieve it.

28:30

We will be a part of your life. We will crossbow

28:35

and of falls. We are red eagles and you

28:40

This victory belongs to everyone.

28:43

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

28:48

to embody our mission to go far

28:51

by the old

28:58

heart heart and nothing

29:02

Our vision through work and effort

29:06

and passion

29:09

We rose again together and grew so much.

29:13

We changed history, we wrote everything.

29:16

Now it's your turn

29:19

And I'm sure you'll achieve it.

29:23

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

29:28

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

29:33

This victory belongs to everyone.

29:36

We are grateful, heart to heart. Let's go

29:41

Living our mission comes

29:44

the signs

29:49

we are songs heart heart nothing

29:53

will stop our vision with work with

29:58

This is my passion

30:03

we are heart

30:26

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

30:29

Let's make history, a new era

30:33

It is our mission

30:36

and our evasion.

30:39

You will dwell as high as a red eagle.

30:43

We will support you at all costs.

30:46

Nothing will stop you.

30:49

Together we will achieve it.

30:53

We will be a part of your life. We will be there if

30:58

of falls. We are red eagles and you

31:03

This victory belongs to everyone.

31:06

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

31:11

to embody our mission to go far

31:14

with life at cost

31:21

heart heart and nothing

31:25

our vision. With work, with

31:28

effort and passion.

31:32

We rose again together and grew so much.

31:36

We changed history, we wrote it

31:38

all.

31:39

Now it's your turn, I'm sure you'll do it.

31:44

achieve.

31:46

We will be a part of your life. We will be there if

31:51

you decline

31:54

the red ones. And your triumph belongs to everyone.

31:59

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

32:04

live our mission. Arriving with the

32:08

coconuts

32:12

we are songs heart heart nothing

32:17

will stop our vision with work, with

32:21

effort and passion.

32:26

We are cato heart.

32:49

The time has come for you not to be your goal. Let's do it

32:53

history, a new era.

32:56

It is our mission

32:59

and brings us anointing.

33:02

You will dwell as high as a red eagle. Come on

33:06

to push you at all costs. Nothing to you

33:10

will stop.

33:12

Together we will achieve it.

33:16

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there.

33:21

and you decline. We are red eagles and you

33:26

This victory belongs to everyone.

33:29

Are

33:31

heart.

33:33

We're going to open and our mission will arrive

33:36

far away due to open consumption

33:44

heart, heart, and nothing enters our

33:48

vision with work, with effort and

33:52

passion

33:55

We rose again together and grew so much,

33:58

We changed history, we wrote it

34:01

all.

34:02

Now it's your turn and I'm sure you'll do it

34:07

achieve.

34:09

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

34:14

if you decline. We are red eagles and you

34:19

This victory belongs to everyone.

34:22

We are songs, heart to heart. Let's go

34:26

live our mission.

34:30

Only

34:32

I'm lying.

34:35

We are songs, heart to heart. Nothing

34:39

will stop our vision with work. With

34:44

That is my passion.

34:49

We are song, heart.

35:12

The time has come for you to achieve your goal.

35:15

Let's make history, a new era.

35:19

It is our mission

35:22

and our elon.

35:25

You will dwell as high as a red eagle.

35:29

We will support you at all costs. Tea

35:33

will stop.

35:35

Together we will achieve it.

35:39

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there.

35:44

and you decline. We are red eagles and you

35:49

This victory belongs to everyone.

35:52

We are heart to heart. We're going to open

35:57

our mission to go far by

36:01

old serum.

36:05

We are heart and soul and nothing gets in.

36:11

our vision. With work, with

36:14

effort and passion.

36:18

We rose again together and grew so much.

36:21

We changed history, we wrote it

36:24

all. Now it's your turn, I'm sure you'll do it.

36:30

achieve.

36:32

We will be a part of your life. We'll be there

36:37

if you decline

36:39

Here are the red ones and your triumph belongs to everyone.

36:45

We are heart, heart, we will live

36:50

Our mission is far from sewing.

36:58

We are songs, heart, heart, nothing.

37:02

will stop our vision with work with

37:07

This passion

37:11

We are song, heart.

37:35

The time has come for you not to be your goal. We have

37:39

history, a new era

37:42

It is our mission.

37:45

And our hope

37:48

You will fly as high as a red eagle. Come on

37:52

expel you at all costs. Nothing to you

37:56

will stop.

37:58

Together we will achieve it.

38:02

We will be a part of your life.

38:06

We'll be there if you fall, we're red eagles

38:11

And your triumph belongs to everyone.

38:15

are

38:17

heart heart let's open our

38:21

mission to go far the bear

38:30

heart heart

38:33

enter our vision

38:35

With work, with effort and passion.

38:41

We rose again together and grew so much.

38:44

We changed history, we wrote everything.

38:48

Now it's your turn

38:51

And I'm sure you'll achieve it.

38:55

We will be a part of your life. We will be there and

39:00

Let us declare

39:02

Here are the red ones.

39:09

Thank you all for your patience.

39:12

It's time to give way to the first

39:14

this morning's conference. Our

39:17

The first guest is Roberto Curi

39:19

Pesantes, who will present the

39:21

Ecuador Digital and Cities Conference

39:23

intelligent, technology as the driving force

39:26

urban development and the

39:27

infrastructure.

39:30

Roberto is an engineer in the sciences of

39:32

administration. It has more than 17

39:34

years of experience in the sectors of

39:37

technology and telecommunications.

39:39

In the public sector he was minister of

39:42

telecommunications,

39:43

General Manager of the Corporation

39:45

National Telecommunications

39:47

and national director of transformation

39:50

technological. He is currently a minister of

39:53

Foreign Relations and Human Mobility

39:55

from Ecuador. We received it with a strong

39:58

Applause, please.

40:07

Good morning everyone.

40:10

It's a true privilege to be here.

40:12

academic space to debate the future

40:16

architectural, structural and

40:18

technological of our country.

40:23

Today, more than talking about technology as

40:26

a digital luxury, I would like to analyze it with

40:29

you in what it really is.

40:32

Is it the new steel or is it the new junk?

40:35

for urban development.

40:38

And the national government through

40:39

your digital agenda 2025-2030

40:43

We have drawn up a roadmap where

40:45

our physical structure and the

40:47

cyberspace works.

40:50

During the next few minutes I want to

40:52

to explain a little about what this policy is

40:54

state and how we redefine the concept

40:57

urban planning transforming our networks

40:59

transport, energy, connectivity and

41:02

state services in a system

41:04

integrated and efficient.

41:07

So thank you very much for the invitation

41:09

And welcome everyone.

41:14

To understand this process, I would like

41:17

to begin to analyze the paradigm

41:19

global urban development.

41:22

During the 20th century, let's say, the

41:25

The progress of countries was measured

41:26

exclusively by the volumes of

41:28

construction, how many kilometers of

41:30

roads were made, they were paved or

41:33

how many bridges were being built.

41:36

Today, uh

41:38

In the Digital Agenda 2025 we recognize

41:41

That vision is important, but it's

41:44

obsolete if that civil works operation

41:48

blind.

41:51

A highway or an electrical grid

41:54

Modern ones are inefficient if they are

41:56

static.

41:58

And the new paradigm transforms this

42:00

urban infrastructure on a platform

42:02

intelligent and predictive.

42:04

We no longer design, or we no longer want to design.

42:06

inert infrastructures, but networks

42:09

instrumented with sensors and with data

42:11

in real time that react under the

42:14

human demand

42:16

before a congestion or a

42:19

structural failure. In other words, we want that

42:21

be predictive.

42:27

Leave me alone because I'm realizing that

42:28

They are not watching the presentation.

42:37

Okay, I'll continue. The first great

42:39

A pillar of this urban development is

42:42

understand that the digital infrastructure

42:44

It is no longer a service, it is no longer a luxury,

42:46

but it's a, it's basically a

42:49

essential public service at the same level

42:52

that drinking water or that energy

42:54

high voltage electrical. Without

42:56

connectivity

42:58

There is no urban planning in terms of bandwidth

43:01

modern. In that sense, the government has

43:04

implemented several actions. In 2025

43:09

We're closed

43:11

the renewal agreements

43:15

of bandwidth and of and of

43:18

frequency of the radio spectrum

43:20

with the companies Claro, Movistar and

43:23

CNP.

43:25

From this point on, companies already have

43:27

legal certainty in order to be able to

43:28

invest and be able to migrate technology from

43:32

3G to 4G and from 4G to 5G. Having 5G will

43:37

will be able to enable the new ones

43:40

technologies that need this low

43:42

latency to be able to implement. From the

43:45

Similarly, we have agreements with

43:47

companies like Starlink to be able to carry

43:49

connectivity to rural areas and

43:51

urban-marginal areas where currently the

43:54

fiber optics or wireless networks do not

43:57

can arrive.

43:59

Ecuador also has a

44:01

optical fiber capillarity quite

44:03

optimal, which allows internet access

44:06

bandwidth to every corner

44:08

of the country. This 2025-2030 agenda prioritizes

44:13

that massive expansion of fiber optics,

44:15

spectrum consolidation for networks

44:17

5G with low latency so that

44:19

large development hubs can

44:22

precisely develop. And why is this?

44:25

important? It's because of these networks

44:27

They really are the backbone

44:29

invisible of the nation. It's the duct

44:31

where millions of data travel through

44:34

second, to be able to automate the

44:36

transport, logistics, industry.

44:38

We cannot build urban centers

44:40

competitive over connections that are

44:42

slow or unstable. The infrastructure

44:45

Digital is truly the foundation for

44:47

that everything else can happen.

44:51

And from this infrastructure

44:53

technology

44:54

This is where new ones begin to be enabled

44:57

technologies and the most noticeable impact

44:59

of this infrastructure in space

45:01

urban life occurs, for example, in the

45:02

mobility. On the digital agenda

45:05

We promote the transition to systems

45:07

known intelligent transport

45:09

technically as ITSs. And it's not about

45:12

modernize the fibers, sorry, the

45:14

vehicle fleets purely, but

45:16

implement layers of intelligence to

45:18

traffic control, road infrastructure

45:21

using vision cameras

45:24

artificial intelligence, algorithms

45:27

in order to manage the networks

45:29

traffic lights and being able to manage traffic

45:31

a smarter way. All this is

45:33

It gives information about these layers of connectivity that

45:36

I mentioned them a while ago, a

45:38

Wait a minute, right? all nodes

45:40

strategic trade ports

45:42

maritime, terminals, logistics

45:44

vials. 5G enables tracking

45:46

automated loading, the

45:48

optimization of transport routes

45:49

heavy and the drastic reduction in

45:52

operating times and costs,

45:54

simultaneously reducing the footprint

45:56

of coal. So, on top of these layers

45:58

digital infrastructure

46:01

all these develop and add up

46:03

new technologies such as artificial intelligence

46:06

artificial and, uh, the IoT, which is the

46:09

Internet of Things. Likewise, the

46:12

urban development is essential for a

46:15

challenge in resource management. This

46:18

agenda 2025-2030 that I mentioned to you

46:21

It incorporates a massive deployment in

46:23

internet of the scabs to be able to

46:25

to make critical infrastructure independent

46:27

of the country. For example, the sector

46:30

energetic. We are transitioning towards

46:32

smart grids or electrical networks

46:34

intelligent. These matrices monitor

46:36

urban consumption in microseconds,

46:39

They balance the loads autonomously

46:40

and efficiently integrate the

46:42

renewable energy sources. In

46:45

water infrastructure, the facility

46:46

of pressure and flow sensors in

46:49

pipes and in urban areas allow

46:51

detect underground micro-leaks earlier

46:53

of causing pavement breaks or

46:55

losses of millions of dollars in resources.

46:58

We went from corrective maintenance and

47:00

costly to predictive maintenance and

47:03

efficient.

47:06

Finally, efficiency too

47:10

It has to go not only in the areas

47:11

urban areas, but it also has to go

47:13

within the state apparatus. A

47:16

Comprehensive urban development requires a

47:18

efficient government. And one of the axes

47:21

central elements of the 2025-2030 agenda

47:24

It is the technology that eliminates the

47:27

bureaucratic barriers and development

47:29

of the works and competitiveness

47:31

productive.

47:32

For example, the massification of the

47:34

sovereign digital identity and the signature

47:36

electronic systems allow the State to operate

47:38

under a strict zero policy

47:40

papers. licensing procedures and

47:43

civil registries, customs,

47:44

public procurement. All this is

47:47

digitizes completely through

47:49

from the cloud. A state that automates,

47:52

Sorry, their processes don't just help to

47:56

to make public management more transparent,

47:59

but it reduces its operating costs

48:00

currents, freeing up resources

48:02

valuable economic resources to be

48:04

reinvested in physical infrastructure

48:07

nationwide.

48:11

In this sense, for a

48:12

urban infrastructure to be functional,

48:15

Your systems cannot operate in nursing homes.

48:18

isolated. It's useless to have a

48:21

ecosystem or a hospital system

48:23

modern if it does not communicate with a network of

48:25

road emergencies or with the control of

48:27

traffic. Herein lies the overall objective

48:30

of interoperability that also

48:32

we are promoting through the agenda

48:34

digital 2025-2030 and through the government

48:38

national.

48:39

the DINAP, which is the address of

48:42

interoperability in the country, its

48:44

The purpose is to enable interoperability

48:45

precisely all the functions of

48:48

State, from ECU 911, from

48:51

hospitals,

48:52

Sri, Ministry of the Interior, Customs,

48:56

so that everything can interoperate and

48:58

can count on the necessary information

49:00

to reduce bureaucracy and

49:03

government procedures.

49:06

an urban infrastructure so that it is

49:08

functional, as I said, they cannot operate

49:10

the isolated ones themselves. And the goal is 2030

49:14

It's that the different layers of everyone

49:15

these urban health ecosystems,

49:17

security, transport, customs and

49:19

energy share data in real time

49:22

under universal technical standards. AND

49:25

If a road emergency occurs,

49:26

Interoperability allows the

49:28

automatic route clearance system for

49:30

ambulances, notify the hospital about

49:32

the patient's arrival and divert the

49:34

traffic for freight transport in

49:36

millisecond. integration is the true

49:39

urban intelligence. This way

49:42

we are,

49:45

Let's say, merging technology and

49:49

digital infrastructure so that the

49:51

urban development of cities and

49:54

also of the country in general, it can happen

49:56

in an efficient and modern way. As

49:59

As I was saying nowadays, we don't measure a

50:02

country not only under the asphalt, but under the

50:05

technology that is the one that really

50:07

opera. behind that asphalt.

50:11

Now, with all this technology too

50:13

The issue of cybersecurity is important.

50:15

in critical infrastructures that

50:17

the country has and as we go

50:19

digitizing the roads, the

50:21

ports, water networks or systems

50:23

electrical, the safety of these

50:25

structures ceases to be solely

50:27

physical, but they also become

50:28

digital. And if we connect the country...

50:31

network, we also need to be able to

50:33

defend them online.

50:36

In that same way, on the agenda

50:37

digital 2025-2030,

50:40

cybersecurity and cyberdefense

50:42

We raised the security level

50:44

national where protocols are established

50:47

mandatory logical shielding for

50:49

all critical infrastructures of

50:51

country, for protection against

50:53

cyberattacks, the encryption of

50:56

industrial control networks and the

50:58

strict protection of the data of

51:00

citizens with conditions not

51:02

negotiable for development and

51:03

stability of our urban environment.

51:07

In conclusion,

51:11

This is a step-by-step process that...

51:13

We started in 2025 and that's how we did it

51:16

we have been developing from 2025 to 2026.

51:20

It focuses on consolidation

51:21

regulatory and the deployment of fever

51:24

of fiber optics and of and of the

51:27

basic infrastructure towards 2027 and

51:30

By 2028 we will see the maturation of these

51:33

5G networks and deployment

51:36

and fiber optics so that in turn

51:38

can be reached towards the areas of

51:41

transport and interoperability of

51:43

State services.

51:45

We aspire that by 2030 the goal will be

51:48

the consolidation of an ecosystem

51:51

mature, resilient, and highly urban

51:53

productive.

51:55

The digital agenda 2025-2030

51:59

You could say it's the plan

52:01

architectural aspect of our morning.

52:04

The challenge is in everyone's hands

52:06

We, in the classrooms, in the minds of

52:08

future engineers, urban planners and

52:11

programmers who will design the

52:12

platforms and structures that the

52:14

Ecuador needs for its future.

52:17

Let's remember that technology is the

52:19

engine, but the ultimate goal is always

52:22

It will be the same, which is to build a

52:25

most competitive, connected and

52:28

prosperous for all.

52:30

Thanks a lot

52:32

And thank you for the space you are giving me.

52:34

giving today. It's a pleasure to be here.

52:36

here.

53:58

and modernization.

55:02

Hello,

55:08

It doesn't happen.

55:12

How do I get back? There it is.

56:23

chat. Uh, yes, I am the manager.

56:26

general of a construction company and

56:28

I am also the general manager of the

56:29

Academy of Construction, which is uh

56:31

an entity that we have created to

56:35

precisely accelerate the curve of

56:37

learning and uniting theory with practice

56:39

practical, specifically for students,

56:41

for professionals and for people who are

56:42

in the environment. Today I'm going to talk to you

56:44

on construction and planning of

56:46

projects. This is a methodology,

56:50

a practice, a mindset that I

56:52

I have implemented in the company that

56:55

I lead. It's not unique, but I think they

56:57

It can serve as a reference, right? I

57:00

I start from a mindset, from a

57:02

principle, build your possible. That

57:04

What does that mean? That this depends

57:06

of us. There is an iconic phrase from

57:08

President John F. Kennedy, who to me

57:10

He was traumatized from a very young age, don't ask him.

57:14

your country what it can do for you,

57:15

but what you can do for your country.

57:17

So, it's under that mindset that...

57:19

we as citizens, as people,

57:21

We need to work. We shouldn't be at

57:23

in anticipation of what the

57:24

The government can give me, of the

57:26

conditions that may give. We are in

57:28

a world of competition, in a world

57:30

where the one who adapts best survives.

57:32

He's not the strongest, he's not the most

57:33

Big, not the fastest, is the one that

57:34

It adapts better. And for that we

57:37

we need to create our own

57:38

odds. So, under that

57:40

This is how I have been leading the process.

57:41

company historically. I entered this

57:44

I've been with this company for 26 years.

57:46

We depended on public tenders, on

57:48

contracts, from an entrepreneur coming to

57:50

hire us for a service of

57:51

construction. What's going on over there?

57:54

You compete on equal terms with

57:55

the rest of the people, what is known

57:57

a red ocean. We all got a little help there

58:00

the best possible prices. And

58:03

What happens when you give the lowest price?

58:05

You reduce your utility, that is, you reduce

58:07

your participation in the economy to

58:10

to be able to add value. This is how

58:12

Until 2014 we handled it this way and in

58:15

I said go ahead, we have to change the

58:17

situation. We have too

58:19

capacity, we also have ideas,

58:20

We can also generate; we are subjects.

58:22

credit, we are people who

58:24

They can get together with people who are

58:26

credit subjects, with investors,

58:28

with bankers, with entrepreneurs and

58:30

form part of a value chain.

58:33

So I start from a

58:35

maximum objective. My ultimate goal

58:37

My goal is to improve the quality of

58:39

people's lives. I'll move that to

58:41

the company as a guiding principle. Each

58:44

Whenever something doesn't go right, I try again.

58:46

I remember why I'm here. EITHER

58:48

In other words, to answer my why. Areas for improvement

58:50

the quality of life of people. AND

58:52

Every time I get out of alignment, I go back to

58:54

to reorient myself under that principle. But

58:56

To achieve that goal I need

58:59

the how. How am I going to do it? Go

59:01

to generate strategies. So, I

59:02

I start with a sustainable life plan and

59:05

I divide the strategies into the three axes

59:07

that are normal in a company that

59:09

He wants to contribute, he wants

59:11

add value. The social, the business

59:13

and the sustainability one. In the social

59:16

We have created schools within the company

59:18

training that we provide to our

59:20

own professionals.

59:22

We are, have been, or are members

59:24

members of chambers, of councils

59:25

business. We worry about the

59:27

health and occupational safety

59:29

of our workers.

59:31

We have a company blog where

59:33

where I am the main one, but also

59:35

There are other people who write, in

59:37

where we communicate different factors, not

59:39

business only, often

59:41

They are from anthropology, psychology,

59:44

market research, trend studies, it

59:47

that comes to mind, I'm reading a

59:48

book, if something occurs to me, I write a

59:49

blog, because what I'm trying to convey is

59:51

knowledge, transmitting ideas,

59:53

transmit filtered experiences under

59:55

From my perspective, that in some way

59:57

Another way might work. and a commitment

59:59

staff. We are looking for the

1:00:01

people have a personal commitment.

1:00:03

We have internal challenges, we face them

1:00:05

challenges of reading a book, challenges of

1:00:08

of physical condition, of nutrition, such as

1:00:11

to keep improving. I'm switching to

1:00:13

sustainable. In the sustainable, we

1:00:16

We look for, if we are already responsible for the

1:00:19

construction and generating projects

1:00:20

real estate agents, we have to be

1:00:22

responsible for ensuring they are sustainable,

1:00:24

that they are green, that they are

1:00:26

energy. As the architect said,

1:00:28

the architect Borja, we the art in

1:00:31

Architecture is the art that is

1:00:33

imposes. I call that the choice

1:00:35

architecture. Architects are the

1:00:38

responsible for where you will live, where

1:00:40

Where will they work?

1:00:41

the rest of the people. If you design

1:00:44

Something that isn't functional, people

1:00:46

within that environment they will not be

1:00:48

functional, that is, they will be less

1:00:50

efficient, less operational. So,

1:00:52

if we also apply that to being

1:00:54

responsible towards the environment,

1:00:56

We can merge the two things. can

1:00:58

a good architectural design will work,

1:00:59

good concept of functionality that

1:01:02

That will contribute to the economy and to

1:01:04

at the same time preserve the environment.

1:01:06

Circular economy, recycle

1:01:09

materials, reuse reuse

1:01:11

processes, uh, working with suppliers

1:01:13

that they recycle. We're part of that, so

1:01:16

how I develop internal staff,

1:01:19

I also develop and form alliances with

1:01:22

suppliers. In other words, I'm looking for a

1:01:23

supplier, because it's small, medium,

1:01:25

big, and I'm looking for alliances because this is

1:01:27

It's about winning, winning, it's not a zero-sum game.

1:01:30

In the past, companies

1:01:32

How did they work? Zero sum, I win.

1:01:33

You lose. That was the way

1:01:36

We work, that's why

1:01:37

We had to charge very little. At the moment that

1:01:39

we enter into a methodology

1:01:41

through a change in mindset, we seek that

1:01:43

We all win in the value chain. That

1:01:45

It ranges from the client, the builder,

1:01:47

the architect and the supplier.

1:01:49

So, we are developing

1:01:51

suppliers so that they leave

1:01:53

strengthening and also applying

1:01:55

best construction practices.

1:01:57

But none of this works if there isn't the

1:01:58

business axis. We live in a

1:02:00

economy, a capitalist economy,

1:02:03

socialist, however you want to see it.

1:02:05

Obviously, because I am a businessman,

1:02:06

I have a capitalist mindset, but

1:02:09

capitalist with a conscience. So, I

1:02:11

I started from the concept of adding

1:02:13

value, diversify, continuous improvement

1:02:15

fixed income and technology. Precisely that

1:02:17

that we heard from the minister. Add

1:02:19

What is value? is any benefit

1:02:22

that the customer perceives about the cost

1:02:24

that we can incur. This

1:02:26

It could be in an architectural design.

1:02:28

You create an architectural design

1:02:30

spectacular. If that's what it means to me, then...

1:02:33

The builder generates value for me because it

1:02:35

I can sell it better, I can sell it more

1:02:36

Expensive, I can optimize it, it goes

1:02:39

to be more efficient, uh, uh, in the

1:02:41

construction, they added value to me.

1:02:42

So, they created that first one.

1:02:45

first step to adding value.

1:02:47

Diversify your own practice that

1:02:49

We have in the company, we

1:02:51

We diversify into multiple projects,

1:02:53

in different segments. Today

1:02:55

We develop projects for

1:02:57

social interest, that is, housing

1:02:59

cheaper than they can be sold

1:03:01

to the economically active stratum.

1:03:04

We have office projects, me

1:03:06

I'm referring to office buildings, centers

1:03:09

commercial, we develop buildings

1:03:11

For clinics and hospitals, it is

1:03:13

In other words, we built the space

1:03:15

where another hospital will operate, but

1:03:16

under real estate methodology. It's not

1:03:18

A construction contract is a

1:03:20

real estate project where one of

1:03:22

The clients are a hospital, and so we go

1:03:24

diversifying into different things.

1:03:26

We are incurring in office warehouses,

1:03:28

We are investing in data centers.

1:03:30

We just heard the minister speak

1:03:32

of everything the government is

1:03:33

doing. What does that mean over there?

1:03:35

As I was saying, I don't expect the

1:03:36

government do something, but if the government

1:03:38

He's already doing it, he's giving it his all.

1:03:41

the steps, the symptoms to be able to

1:03:44

to generate opportunities, the entrepreneur

1:03:46

He has to go out after those

1:03:48

opportunities and capitalize on them.

1:03:49

just as an example with this

1:03:51

topic of artificial intelligence. It

1:03:53

We were talking here with some people.

1:03:55

Today, data centers

1:03:58

Artificial intelligence is in other

1:04:00

countries. If you are talking to GPT chat

1:04:02

that has the option to be able

1:04:04

to talk, you talk to the GPT chat, you

1:04:05

He answers, he often answers you with

1:04:07

Argentine accents. What does it mean? That

1:04:09

The data center is in Buenos Aires, in

1:04:11

somewhere, sometimes it's in Miami

1:04:13

also. So, the processing

1:04:16

data collects existing data

1:04:18

powered by the LMS, the largeu

1:04:21

models in the sector where they are and from there

1:04:24

They answer you. And I was joking with him in

1:04:26

a moment with someone with whom

1:04:27

We were talking. If you ask him where he's from

1:04:29

It's the best ceviche, maybe it will answer your question

1:04:31

the Peruvian. And maybe we

1:04:32

We want to answer the one from Machala, the one from

1:04:34

Manta, the one from Guayaquil, the one from Quito, the

1:04:36

From Cuenca, I don't know, I mean, wherever you're from

1:04:38

preference, but like language

1:04:40

He's trained in another region, he's going to

1:04:42

answer what they have said to him.

1:04:44

They have trained him in another

1:04:46

region. So, that kind of thing

1:04:48

We must take advantage of them. So what then?

1:04:50

Are opportunities opening up? Data centers

1:04:52

for AI here in Ecuador, AICS that is

1:04:55

They call. So, we're starting to

1:04:56

We're just starting to venture into this.

1:04:58

Let's get to work, we're uniting the

1:04:59

various actors, to the end consumer,

1:05:01

to the operator, to the landowner, to

1:05:04

intermediary. And that's where the academy goes

1:05:06

to be extremely important because now we have to

1:05:08

hire staff to be able to train

1:05:10

the models. So, the academy is in

1:05:12

teachers and students. Let's go between

1:05:14

people to start training these

1:05:16

models locally and there are already others

1:05:18

Companies, we are not the only ones who do it

1:05:19

They are doing. Continuous improvement, starting

1:05:22

from a philosophy that perhaps

1:05:25

Many find it difficult because of ego. I am the

1:05:27

Better yet, I know everything. That's a lie, nobody said it.

1:05:28

He knows everything, but nobody has learned everything.

1:05:30

There is always room for improvement.

1:05:32

If one enters into his life, into his company,

1:05:34

in his philosophy, in his class of

1:05:36

that you can learn something, you open the

1:05:39

mind. When you open your mind

1:05:40

You're definitely going to learn, and that's it.

1:05:42

your first your first opportunity to

1:05:44

improve. Fixed income is also something that

1:05:46

has implemented it in Etinar under the

1:05:48

Rates model, Real Estate Investment

1:05:50

Trust. In that we have been somewhat pioneers.

1:05:53

Well, I was kind of a pioneer in this area, but

1:05:55

Actually, that's already been invented in

1:05:56

The United States in 1960. So, what

1:05:58

What I've done is bring a good practice

1:06:00

business where people before

1:06:03

We used to build to sell, now

1:06:04

We build to rent. If that's arron

1:06:07

It generates a profit for you,

1:06:09

a capitalization rate, a cap rate,

1:06:11

as it is known in the United States

1:06:13

indicator, higher than the financial cost,

1:06:16

then it's better to build for

1:06:18

lease and not build to sell.

1:06:19

But that's something that needs to be done, that needs to be done

1:06:21

understand it. Why do I do it? Because the

1:06:23

the economy in construction is

1:06:24

cyclical. A project lasts me 2 3 4

1:06:27

years. With this model you can go up to 30

1:06:29

years. Then you manage to generate a

1:06:31

fixed income, which allows you to sustain

1:06:33

a team. If you hold a team,

1:06:35

you release you release resources to be able

1:06:37

to think and start the cycle again that

1:06:39

I'll explain more later. AND

1:06:41

technology, because they are definitely the

1:06:43

tools that we develop

1:06:45

within the company or we incorporate

1:06:47

from third parties to be able to

1:06:49

control our projects. Us

1:06:51

We are a company that today has more than

1:06:53

1600 employees and we manage 48

1:06:56

projects. Those 48 projects

1:06:58

We manage with five people because

1:06:59

We have technology, we develop

1:07:02

we develop or we complement each other

1:07:04

with people who handle BIM, Building

1:07:06

Information Modeling, which is a process

1:07:08

that uses certain tools of

1:07:10

AutoCAD, from Revit, which allows modeling,

1:07:13

It allows us to anticipate, it allows us to collaborate.

1:07:15

Many of you know him here in

1:07:17

the Construction Academy in

1:07:19

alliance with the Catholic University of

1:07:20

We are going to give courses in Cuenca

1:07:21

regarding their help with that. But

1:07:23

Behind that, we generate data. Those

1:07:26

We collect the data in some

1:07:27

software that we control from the

1:07:29

budget, the schedule, the

1:07:31

accounting, everything. So, may I

1:07:33

It can be solved with just a few people. That's why

1:07:36

that part of my strategy is to focus

1:07:38

in technology with a lot with a lot

1:07:39

force, with a lot of emphasis. Of

1:07:42

There's the cultural aspect, I'll discuss it later.

1:07:44

I'll see. I have a golden book that I

1:07:45

I call, which is a, a writing, a

1:07:50

a little book that I made for the

1:07:51

people know what the mentality is like, what

1:07:53

That's what I expect from people. I don't

1:07:55

I demand schedules, I don't demand anything else.

1:07:57

In particular, I demand results, uh the

1:08:00

communication that is synchronous. If I

1:08:01

I'm writing to you at 3 in the morning, because no

1:08:03

Don't be offended because it was an idea that came to me

1:08:04

occurred. You answer me at 9, respect that

1:08:06

my sense of urgency. topics that are already

1:08:08

of mindset of of of more than of of

1:08:11

To assert oneself as the leader of a team is

1:08:14

to be the leader of this team that

1:08:16

Let's all work for the same thing.

1:08:17

same north. The company's values,

1:08:20

motivation, discipline, teams

1:08:22

cross-cutting and specialized teams.

1:08:23

I'll tell you what that is later.

1:08:25

from there. It is a methodology that has

1:08:27

It has served me well, and obviously...

1:08:29

instead of telling people what

1:08:30

to do it, because they, that's why, that's why

1:08:32

They are part of a team, I can have

1:08:34

ideas, I can generate the

1:08:35

planning, but someone else is going to

1:08:37

to execute, another will develop the

1:08:39

programming. What I give them is a

1:08:41

north basically with a concept that

1:08:43

I call the numerator the denominator. In a

1:08:45

Company, you have two options to

1:08:47

generate in order to generate value. If you have a

1:08:50

a numerator that is already defined,

1:08:53

You have a billing that won't

1:08:55

to grow, then what you have to

1:08:56

optimization is the denominator. You have to

1:08:58

to have fewer people. But if you have one

1:09:01

people who are very good and you know that

1:09:03

You can take advantage of them, don't take it out

1:09:05

that team, but rather it grows

1:09:07

numerator. Let's focus on what

1:09:09

We can develop new projects,

1:09:10

That's why I need technology and everything else.

1:09:12

others. So, I've opted for that

1:09:13

option. There are companies that seek to be

1:09:16

much more efficient in the

1:09:17

managing what little they have. I

1:09:19

I prefer to be efficient in the little that I do.

1:09:21

I have it, but it's growing and growing.

1:09:23

numerator. And in that way the company, I

1:09:25

I was telling five people, five

1:09:26

people who control the works, but

1:09:28

Actually, there are 250 of us in the company.

1:09:31

professionals among architects,

1:09:32

engineers, economists, uh

1:09:34

professionals in various fields,

1:09:37

marketing people.

1:09:39

But the overhead, which is called the

1:09:41

fixed cost of the company, what what

1:09:43

not what I cannot, what I cannot

1:09:45

I want to reduce, nowadays we represent

1:09:47

less than 3%. Then 3% of the

1:09:50

global revenue in a company that

1:09:52

The industry is usually around 10%.

1:09:53

12 is surface and we have that

1:09:55

achieved with technology and with this

1:09:57

mindset. And from there, then, the

1:09:59

main indicators that I monitor

1:10:01

Three is basically schedule, quality

1:10:04

and costs. There are no more indicators

1:10:06

important ones, there are many others, but in

1:10:08

Actually, these are the three that I

1:10:10

I focus on them and they matter a lot to me.

1:10:12

Let's see if we can move on to the next one. He

1:10:15

life plan summary. I was telling them

1:10:17

Why, I was telling them how,

1:10:20

the what, what do I want to be. That's the vision.

1:10:23

The great thing we have is to be the

1:10:25

most prestigious construction company

1:10:26

and national recognition. I haven't said

1:10:28

the largest. This is what's been created here.

1:10:30

25 years ago. this vision that I

1:10:31

When I joined the company, the first thing I

1:10:33

What I did was lay out the basic concepts of

1:10:35

one of the book of a company. The

1:10:37

mission, vision, obviously the

1:10:39

His strategy has been changing, but the

1:10:41

The vision was always the same from day one. Does

1:10:43

I joined this company at 26, it's been 27 now.

1:10:46

to be the largest construction company

1:10:47

prestige, because prestige is what

1:10:49

It brings you the rest. It's not about being great, no

1:10:51

It's about being efficient, because maybe you are

1:10:53

Big, but you're a company

1:10:55

corrupt that appears in these, uh, I don't even know

1:10:58

how many green, green books that

1:10:59

They emerged during the era of corruption

1:11:02

with the brevity. We haven't left

1:11:03

None of that because we've focused on

1:11:05

To add value, we have focused on being

1:11:07

honest, in being

1:11:11

to contribute, to improve the quality of

1:11:13

people's lives. The life plan,

1:11:15

Basically, in three words, create

1:11:17

value, develop people and

1:11:18

to positively transform the city. The

1:11:20

strategic axes. These are the axes

1:11:22

strategic ones that I have. Have

1:11:24

engineering, architecture, real estate,

1:11:26

sustainability, social aspect and finance.

1:11:29

We build with value, with purpose

1:11:34

the types of growth that a

1:11:36

company. You have the types of

1:11:37

growth, organic growth,

1:11:38

You grow according to the

1:11:39

contracts that they give you,

1:11:41

pipeline of new projects, already

1:11:43

You start planning to have towards

1:11:45

Go ahead and tell us what you're going to do. We in

1:11:47

Etinar, what do we do? We are promoters

1:11:48

real estate. And we really are

1:11:51

builders, but we developed the

1:11:52

real estate promotion line for

1:11:54

to be able to anticipate what we are going to

1:11:56

build. So, I know what I'm going to do.

1:11:58

to build in 2030. I don't depend on

1:12:00

government construction contract,

1:12:02

from the fifth bridge, I don't even know how long, no, to

1:12:04

the best and most competitive in that, but I know

1:12:06

what I'm going to build, what I have

1:12:07

controlled for the next 3 cu 5

1:12:10

years. Overlapping projects. I'm going to

1:12:12

I'll tell you later what I mean.

1:12:14

I mean by that thing there. Innovation and

1:12:16

new businesses. always thinking

1:12:18

ahead of topics that may

1:12:21

can go out and this not only does not

1:12:23

Take it as a company, how easy it is to do it in one

1:12:25

company. This company has had its

1:12:27

cycles, where he has been very bad, has

1:12:28

It's been great, but this is it

1:12:30

mindset, this way of working

1:12:33

in which from an isolated person

1:12:35

can get together with two or three people,

1:12:37

find an investor and develop

1:12:39

with innovation. Today the idea is worthwhile

1:12:42

more than capital. Remember that.

1:12:44

If you go to a bank, obviously you have

1:12:46

that is eligible for credit. No, I'm not.

1:12:47

credit subject, my friend. Yes. The

1:12:49

The bank will lend you money at 8%, at 7%, at

1:12:51

9%, to 10% if the project is good. But

1:12:54

The idea could be worth much more. An idea

1:12:56

It can generate 20, 30% for you, and if you do it

1:12:59

With profitability, it can generate 18%

1:13:01

for 30 years. Then we must

1:13:03

To innovate is to create, to seek

1:13:04

new opportunities that do not exist in

1:13:06

the market. Our evolution,

1:13:08

Obviously, it belongs to our foundation.

1:13:09

we have consolidated, we have

1:13:11

expanded, but that's where we started with a

1:13:13

exponential growth since

1:13:15

We integrate design and construction. Is

1:13:17

In other words, it starts adding value

1:13:19

architect, I suggest that I am going to

1:13:21

to explain what methodology I

1:13:22

I have something to say about it. Innovation of

1:13:24

project of new model projects,

1:13:27

ways to grow. Remember that I

1:13:29

I tell you, I am a construction company,

1:13:31

That is, there is the second box,

1:13:34

to execute works, time, cost, quality,

1:13:36

etc. But in order for me to grow I have done

1:13:38

what is called vertical growth

1:13:40

forward, that is, I got into the

1:13:42

distributor value chain. Before

1:13:45

For me, the distributor was a promoter,

1:13:47

So I became a promoter because I

1:13:49

I control the developer's margin and now

1:13:52

I control the builder's margin. Already

1:13:54

I do not sacrifice the builder because I am

1:13:55

myself. I say builder, you are going to

1:13:57

receive a 10% margin and the promoter

1:14:00

I'll give it 20%, but that's 20% out of 10.

1:14:02

that the other one is going to win. Obviously

1:14:04

There are structures, trusts, two

1:14:06

companies, but each one contributes

1:14:09

He contributes his own part. And then I realized

1:14:12

if someone is buying one from me

1:14:14

property because that someone is a

1:14:16

investor who is going to lease it, I

1:14:18

I figured this must be a good business. He

1:14:19

This guy is buying me at the price of

1:14:21

market and about the market price

1:14:23

where I have a 20% margin per

1:14:25

To put it that way, this guy is going to start

1:14:27

surrender it to someone. It means that

1:14:29

someone is paying enough to

1:14:31

that this investment is attractive. As

1:14:33

That investment is attractive, what if

1:14:35

We explored it and began to explore it

1:14:37

and we started getting into that and today in

1:14:39

We also operate real estate today

1:14:41

through this RATS modality where

1:14:42

We build and sell long-term

1:14:45

with direct credit for 10 years, 12 years,

1:14:47

We offer a 12% rate of return or

1:14:49

We rent them out, which generates between 12,

1:14:51

18 depending on what is achieved, because

1:14:53

On the other side there is someone who wants

1:14:55

also to gain some advantage. AND

1:14:58

Then I realized if there is anyone who

1:15:00

is renting this office,

1:15:02

This place, this production center.

1:15:05

It must be good, because if the

1:15:07

The guy is paying a rent of $25,

1:15:10

So it must be generating something.

1:15:12

Then I started to explore

1:15:14

in the in the in the in the revenue share

1:15:17

which is called, at the entrance of the

1:15:20

customer who is going to rent. I say that I

1:15:22

I'll lower the rent, I'm not charging you $20 anymore.

1:15:25

I charge you per square meter of rent

1:15:26

15, but I charge you 10-20% of your

1:15:29

billing. Then I go into the

1:15:32

the business opportunity, the customer

1:15:34

And with that you begin to create value towards

1:15:36

back. And once these three steps are under control,

1:15:39

Remember that I was telling you about the about the about

1:15:42

denominator. The denominator is also

1:15:44

important. So I say, what are you

1:15:45

It seems if we're doing a

1:15:46

Vertical growth backwards? Is

1:15:49

In other words, now we're going to get into the

1:15:51

production value chain.

1:15:54

So, as we've grown and with this

1:15:57

This strategy has allowed me to be one of

1:15:59

the main buyers of concrete,

1:16:01

of steel, of elevators, of

1:16:03

porcelain tiles, paint. So,

1:16:06

I mean, I don't need a...

1:16:08

intermediary distributor. I can

1:16:10

arrive directly at the factory. He

1:16:12

started making agreements directly

1:16:13

with factories. I started locally with the

1:16:15

major steel mills, with the main

1:16:17

concrete mixers. I'll buy the cement now.

1:16:19

directly in the factories, no longer

1:16:21

at distributors. I left because of salanatos

1:16:23

I went to Italy, I went to Spain, I closed

1:16:24

directly contracts with certain

1:16:26

People, uh, faucets, sanitary ware

1:16:29

directly in Spain with brands

1:16:31

like Rock and you're right here

1:16:34

now without intermediaries. Obviously

1:16:36

I need someone to manage me. Is

1:16:38

the same distributor I tell, "Hey,

1:16:39

Here, here you no longer have to pay.

1:16:41

inventory, you no longer have the cost of

1:16:43

Opportunity, isn't it? Here I'm going to

1:16:46

In other words, this is what I need to buy.

1:16:48

I'll pay you a Facebook, but I'll buy it.

1:16:50

directly. He saves himself the

1:16:51

financial risk, the cash flow is saved

1:16:53

box because I buy directly.

1:16:55

So also if I keep growing

1:16:58

vertically forward, also

1:17:00

we have begun to grow backwards in

1:17:02

different suppliers

1:17:04

still key strategies, right? Not in

1:17:06

all because it's not worth seeing each other

1:17:07

to get involved in everything, at least to

1:17:09

us and for our capacity.

1:17:13

This is what I was telling you, architect

1:17:14

engineering. This is a methodology

1:17:16

extraordinary that we have

1:17:19

developed in the company where not

1:17:22

only together the architecture in the

1:17:24

engineering, but I go backwards

1:17:26

to understand what the client needs.

1:17:29

What is this here, what is it that I

1:17:30

Does it allow you to do that? I first evaluate the

1:17:32

market. What is the market? He

1:17:33

land. The land is located in a

1:17:35

sector where offices are sold

1:17:37

mostly at 2,200 per m². are

1:17:41

combined with commercial premises. Here

1:17:43

No houses work in this place, no.

1:17:46

Hospitals function because there are already hospitals.

1:17:47

many around. I study the market, of

1:17:50

I apply the regulations there. What do I

1:17:53

Allows? What prevents me from doing the

1:17:54

municipality? a 10-story building,

1:17:56

20 stories, five stories, uh, so many

1:17:59

density, both occupancy coefficient

1:18:01

of land, of land use,

1:18:02

restrictions, uh, in the ceded areas

1:18:05

to the municipality, if they require or if there are advantages

1:18:08

Green, there are often advantages

1:18:10

green, having all five facades, eh good

1:18:12

Places with a good rooftop, like here

1:18:14

I've seen that there are a lot of them in Cuenca,

1:18:16

That, uh, in certain sectors, uh, is very

1:18:19

Highly sought after by banks, they give you

1:18:21

better conditions. With that I create a

1:18:23

feasibility and before it enters

1:18:25

architecture team, this from here to

1:18:28

It takes me 5 minutes to determine if yes

1:18:30

I'm going to join a project or not, and I already have

1:18:32

even the numbers of what's going to

1:18:34

happen. Because? Because that's how I am

1:18:36

builder, I have data through my

1:18:38

systems, I know how much it might cost me

1:18:40

a building of so many meters

1:18:42

squares that are sold on the market

1:18:44

so much. I have my factors. The land

1:18:46

It should weigh up to 10%, the construction

1:18:48

It should weigh between 45 and 52%. the

1:18:51

indirect 20, the difference is

1:18:53

usefulness, if that gives 20% it's good, if not

1:18:55

not that simple. So, when I

1:18:57

I develop this, only then do I incorporate

1:19:00

I say to an architect,

1:19:02

"Look, I need to build so many meters

1:19:03

squares, it has to have so many

1:19:05

efficiency in sales, it has to have

1:19:07

So many premises, the offices have to

1:19:08

Being 45, the locals being 60, I don't know, I

1:19:11

I first develop the model here and then...

1:19:13

I present it with architecture

1:19:15

When I already have plans, I already have

1:19:17

renders, which can be renders made

1:19:19

uh still uh very very simple, like a

1:19:22

kind of like a model, actually, like

1:19:25

a prototype

1:19:26

We then moved on to the team of

1:19:28

marketing to validate it. Once

1:19:30

that with the marketing team

1:19:32

We validated, we went to market. Yes, that's it.

1:19:34

We structure trusts, alliances

1:19:36

and we went out to market. While the

1:19:38

architecture team advances to a

1:19:40

that we call the design phase

1:19:42

architectural. I haven't logged in yet.

1:19:45

develop plans or engineering eh

1:19:47

structural, that's going to cost me.

1:19:49

What I'm trying to do is make my [process] more efficient.

1:19:52

investment, not to spend more than 1 or 2% of the

1:19:55

total project in this first phase.

1:19:57

When I finally reach a point

1:19:59

equilibrium means that already in the

1:20:02

In the next 6 months I have to start

1:20:04

build. Then I came back and we started to

1:20:06

interact between architecture and

1:20:08

engineering. That's where it really begins

1:20:10

the final model of

1:20:12

project, that's where we look for the

1:20:14

efficiencies, that's where the

1:20:16

Engineers, that's where the la la la come in.

1:20:19

ideas, knowledge from experience

1:20:21

for that product, that prototype that I

1:20:23

I had a digital mockup, I could already do it

1:20:26

build and make it efficient. When

1:20:28

That's already decided, the process begins

1:20:30

construction and we, well

1:20:31

We completed our work.

1:20:34

This here is just for...

1:20:35

To recap, I don't just do it to

1:20:38

me as a promoter, for my own

1:20:40

projects. When a customer calls me

1:20:42

to build, that is, the last one

1:20:44

the last, the last link of the

1:20:46

chain, I do that same analysis to

1:20:49

my technical team, because if we

1:20:51

We came out above 55%, which I know

1:20:54

that he can sell because I do the

1:20:56

market research for him, I mean, let's see,

1:20:58

This gentleman who is hiring me...

1:20:59

office building has so many meters

1:21:01

squares for sale, in the market

1:21:03

It's selling for 2,200, I guess.

1:21:05

It's selling for 2,200, I estimate its

1:21:07

maximum selling price, I mean, I have

1:21:09

than aiming for 52%. If I'm at 52%

1:21:12

He's going to hire me. If I'm around

1:21:13

If I get above 52%, they're not going to hire me or they're going to...

1:21:16

negotiations will be more difficult and will

1:21:18

open up to looking for other builders. No

1:21:20

I want it to open. Then I go into

1:21:22

handle that and come back without me

1:21:25

as requested by the client, to do engineering

1:21:27

value with my in-house engineers or

1:21:29

external. We developed an optimization

1:21:32

And I tell the client, "Look, I'll tell you

1:21:34

I can do it at this price that I know

1:21:35

It represents 52, 51, but I have

1:21:39

optimized that design. By optimizing that

1:21:41

In design, I capture a bit more margin. Already

1:21:43

I'm not in the 5%, I'm moving up to 10%, to 12%.

1:21:46

So this methodology, I...

1:21:48

I apply this when I am a developer or when

1:21:50

I am simply a builder, because if

1:21:52

I understand my client, with that I

1:21:53

I achieve, I achieve, uh, uh, a contract of

1:21:56

construction.

1:21:59

Let's move on to the next one. This is what remained.

1:22:05

One back. One back.

1:22:07

One back.

1:22:09

Say a prayer to that one. All of this is

1:22:14

possible with the team. We in

1:22:16

To get, we have a, a, a

1:22:19

Wei mentality. In other words, there is no "me" here.

1:22:22

There is no me, there is no us. And I do a lot.

1:22:26

emphasis on that over there, because I am not

1:22:28

I am a civil engineer, not an architect.

1:22:30

I am a planner, a strategist,

1:22:33

financial, I have a financial advisor who knows

1:22:35

I have a better understanding of finance than I do.

1:22:36

an accountant who knows more about accounting

1:22:38

I have a marketing person

1:22:41

who knows more about marketing than I do, who

1:22:43

that market research that I do in

1:22:44

5 minutes, it's done quickly

1:22:46

reviewing what exists on the market,

1:22:48

going into Google, going into the

1:22:50

specialized real estate websites,

1:22:53

But they know the customer,

1:22:54

They reach the customer. So, Wi is

1:22:56

a mindset where everything is done as a team,

1:22:59

Those 250 people generate jobs for those...

1:23:03

13 other construction workers

1:23:05

that we use. We are the

1:23:07

Second, last year we finished as the

1:23:08

second largest formal employer of the

1:23:11

construction. Formal, I emphasize, because

1:23:13

We affiliate 100% of our

1:23:15

workers, which is not a practice

1:23:17

very common in the industry. What is it

1:23:19

What are we looking for with the team? the impact

1:23:20

what we want: time, cost, quality,

1:23:22

security, innovation, experience of

1:23:23

customer. What are the five pillars

1:23:25

of this culture? Trust. Yesterday

1:23:28

We were talking with friends here

1:23:30

with the group and I was telling them a

1:23:32

experience I had at university

1:23:34

when I first entered a

1:23:35

university in the United States. I them

1:23:37

He asked, "What backs the dollar?" Me

1:23:39

He made me take out a two-dollar bill, he made me

1:23:41

Turn it over and it said, "In God we

1:23:42

"trust." And I say, "What does that mean?"

1:23:45

That this is based on trust. The

1:23:47

The United States economy is based

1:23:49

in confidence. The economy in general

1:23:51

It is based on trust. A banknote does not

1:23:53

It is something other than a promise of payment. Yeah

1:23:55

Do you think that bill will do you any good?

1:23:57

to buy you some chewing gum at the store,

1:23:59

You pick it up. Otherwise, no. That's why

1:24:00

Our Sucre, those who are young, no

1:24:02

They know, but our Sucre was devaluing

1:24:05

day by day, that is, a moment arrived

1:24:07

which was devaluing by almost $0,000 daily. EITHER

1:24:09

So, you had 1000 Sucres here, you were leaving

1:24:11

to buy chewing gum, you couldn't anymore

1:24:13

the following day. So, why the Sucre

1:24:15

It lost confidence, the dollar continues with

1:24:17

Trust, the economy is based on trust.

1:24:19

The relationships are based on trust, the

1:24:21

Business is based on trust. Collaboration,

1:24:24

We need to collaborate among ourselves

1:24:25

people, whether internal or external.

1:24:27

Collaboration is success, the

1:24:29

responsibility, learning and

1:24:31

purpose. Let's move on to the next one.

1:24:36

This is a formula that I also

1:24:38

I have at the company. Many people

1:24:40

Sometimes it's hard for her, but hey, hey, I understand her

1:24:42

from the outside. But in reality they are

1:24:45

taken from books and I am 15, 20 years old

1:24:48

applying them. We at the company

1:24:50

You ask me what it's like

1:24:51

organizational chart, it is not an organizational chart

1:24:54

manager, financial manager, manager

1:24:55

administrative, legal manager, no. That is

1:24:59

a structure that evidently for

1:25:00

externally it has that

1:25:03

presentation, but internally it has

1:25:06

These three axes, these three types of

1:25:08

organizational charts. The first organizational chart is

1:25:10

Apple-style, it's managed in silos in

1:25:13

where we are with a team of

1:25:14

architecture, a finance team, a

1:25:16

commercial budgeting team and

1:25:18

construction. When I am

1:25:19

developing a project, I don't need

1:25:20

More than a person, I need a

1:25:22

architect. Because in the methodology of

1:25:24

architect engineering, I do it myself

1:25:26

general survey or the architect

1:25:29

"Look," I tell him, "this is the CCUs."

1:25:30

What do you think about this? Learn more here

1:25:32

tall, shorter, or the height, I need

1:25:34

operating rooms. It has to be 380 and something,

1:25:36

They're not just high-rise offices

1:25:38

Free of 245, I don't know, hotels,

1:25:41

You develop the product and you don't have to

1:25:43

involve the other 250 nor the

1:25:45

another 1500, considering the

1:25:47

workers, one or two people, nothing

1:25:49

further. Once that phase passes, the

1:25:52

architect and you start working with the one from

1:25:54

finance. In the arms finance sector, the

1:25:55

topic, the meetings with the banks. A

1:25:57

Once you make that feasible, you move on to

1:25:59

budget team and so on.

1:26:01

value chain. When it's already done

1:26:03

The project has been developed and is now going to

1:26:05

To begin, enter a structure of

1:26:07

Nvidia. Nvidia is the company

1:26:10

number one in chips, in EPUs, the

1:26:13

which is precisely what it serves to do

1:26:15

data processing. It began for

1:26:17

perform graphics processing with

1:26:19

the topic of video games. Nowadays

1:26:21

It is the base on which the

1:26:24

artificial intelligence. So that

1:26:27

I call the same methodology

1:26:29

working in cross-functional teams. Me too

1:26:31

There, yes, together with all the actors, together

1:26:33

to the architecture leader, leader of

1:26:35

budget, to the sales leader, to the

1:26:36

construction leader and we work

1:26:38

simultaneously where here my

1:26:41

Private participation is already happening

1:26:43

least. My participation more

1:26:46

This is important. Here it's less.

1:26:47

because I'm already part of a team and then

1:26:50

finally when construction begins

1:26:52

if it is a hierarchical structure. Yes, that's it.

1:26:54

There has to be a structure, like me

1:26:55

I mean, la la in the Napoleonic style

1:26:57

Bonaparte, because you have a general and

1:26:59

You have the entire army below you, then

1:27:01

who has to follow orders, because there

1:27:03

Yes, you already have everything pre-planned in the

1:27:06

part of planning and programming and

1:27:08

What needs to be done is to run it and

1:27:09

For that, we need to be systematic and

1:27:11

efficient. So this is a

1:27:12

methodology that I use to move in the

1:27:16

the map of this organizational chart

1:27:18

depending on the state in which it

1:27:19

find my project, at the stage where

1:27:21

that my project is found. Let's go to the

1:27:24

following.

1:27:26

This is an operating cycle, for many.

1:27:28

It could be, uh, uh, common sense.

1:27:31

I want to emphasize that. Investment, process,

1:27:34

sales, delivery. This is a cycle that doesn't

1:27:36

never. The investment is what

1:27:38

activates the cycle without investment. In the

1:27:41

Investment could be an idea, remember that.

1:27:43

that the idea is worth more than the capital.

1:27:45

So, investment can be a

1:27:47

idea. You arrive with an idea

1:27:48

spectacular to develop a center

1:27:49

commercial in a place where you have

1:27:52

an opportunity detected because there is no

1:27:54

larger larger uh uh infrastructures

1:27:56

in this regard. You present it to a team

1:27:59

and you activated a cycle. the

1:28:02

execution, everything we just did

1:28:04

speaking from a design perspective, the

1:28:05

implementation,

1:28:06

the consequence, the achievement of

1:28:08

the funds, a bank, an investor,

1:28:10

going out to market it, sales for

1:28:13

recover the box and the delivery of the work

1:28:15

which is already the process of creation

1:28:17

of the product or construction. This,

1:28:19

Basically, it's capital, management, and

1:28:21

market. The other day I was reading a book

1:28:24

from Elon Musk's, where he has

1:28:27

an extraordinary mindset of

1:28:30

trying to contribute to the world, but he

1:28:32

He says, "Without the markets I can't

1:28:34

"Get it." So, he's not a type

1:28:37

that he loves markets very much. He is

1:28:39

He is clearly the richest man in

1:28:41

world, but he takes advantage of the

1:28:43

markets to raise funds and

1:28:46

power following uh uh trying to of

1:28:49

to pursue its purpose, considering that

1:28:51

when he sold PayPal, which he developed

1:28:53

PayPal technology, it sold 200

1:28:55

millions and spent the last penny on

1:28:58

create Tesla. So he's the kind of guy who

1:29:00

definitely not money, because it's not the

1:29:02

What moves it, moves it, something else else. He

1:29:04

The market is necessary for everyone.

1:29:06

us. Even though we have a

1:29:08

fundamental purpose, then, to improve

1:29:10

the quality of life of people,

1:29:11

We need this market and those are

1:29:14

learnings that I have

1:29:15

I have learned it, so I pass it on to you. Come on

1:29:17

next time

1:29:20

box curve. Many people say, "Ah, it's

1:29:23

"He can do it because he has money." Les

1:29:25

I say that's how she behaves

1:29:27

box curve. The white one is the

1:29:29

construction. That's what I need

1:29:30

build a project and that's how

1:29:33

My funds are coming in. So,

1:29:35

Who makes the difference? That deficit

1:29:37

I need to leverage my finances.

1:29:39

in a bank or with an investor,

1:29:42

considering again the cost of

1:29:44

capital is the cheapest in this

1:29:46

process. A bank will charge you 8, 9,

1:29:49

10%, 12% if you're not a very good subject of

1:29:52

credit, 12% is still less than the

1:29:54

20 that you're going to earn, and in the 20th it is

1:29:56

including the 12th. That is, possibly

1:29:58

If you add that to it, then you would be

1:30:00

in 25. So, it must be understood that a

1:30:02

The project is always cash flow deficit

1:30:06

And you have to leverage that. When

1:30:07

You break that curve, that's when you start to

1:30:10

earn money. So, that's why

1:30:12

We overlap projects, because

1:30:14

In this cycle I have projects that go with

1:30:16

a deficit flow, but there are others that

1:30:18

They're almost finished and I'm entering a

1:30:20

virtuous circle that is similar to the

1:30:22

that we saw from this cash cycle

1:30:24

that we were presenting, right? And here

1:30:27

You see it, the operating cycle,

1:30:30

the cash curve and the projects

1:30:32

overlapping. What do I mean by a

1:30:33

overlapping project? a project is born,

1:30:35

It grows, it gets there at a point, and if not

1:30:38

You take on another project, you still have your

1:30:40

infrastructure, you start spending

1:30:42

that money. So you have to put

1:30:44

another one before it starts to

1:30:46

to be deficient. And there is a

1:30:48

Peter principle concept. He

1:30:50

The Peter Principle is when a person

1:30:52

reaches their level of competence. The

1:30:54

The company also has a principle of

1:30:56

Peter. We're all going to reach a level

1:30:58

of incompetence. If we get into 50

1:31:01

projects, maybe we're not so

1:31:02

efficient as if we did six or

1:31:03

seven. But if you do six or seven, then...

1:31:05

It's better to enter a low cycle and have

1:31:08

that start to take out then the the

1:31:10

denominator, you have to start taking out

1:31:12

people. So, if people are good,

1:31:14

You should focus on creating new ones

1:31:15

cycles. And this here is a is a is a

1:31:17

The cycle is a process that never stops.

1:31:20

until the day that unfortunately

1:31:22

God guide us, we as individuals,

1:31:25

We should never stop trying

1:31:27

to produce, contribute, and generate value,

1:31:29

because the longer it goes

1:31:31

As we go along, we make mistakes that

1:31:34

We are constantly improving them.

1:31:36

continued. We are committed to that continuous improvement.

1:31:38

gaining experience. that experience

1:31:40

It needs to be passed on to the

1:31:42

young people, to the students who are coming

1:31:43

back so they can speed up their course

1:31:45

learning and this process returns

1:31:47

that never stops. So, I think

1:31:50

That concludes my presentation.

1:31:52

I want to remind you, then, that all this

1:31:54

It works with a greater purpose. The fact that

1:31:57

I have chosen for myself, which can be

1:31:58

wide, gigantic, maybe then

1:32:00

dreamer, it is about improving the quality of

1:32:02

people's lives. So I hope that

1:32:03

I hope this has been helpful to you and that

1:32:05

has indeed improved for them

1:32:06

quality of life today.

1:32:07

Thanks a lot.

1:32:28

It's time to welcome Roberto Stark

1:32:31

From Mexico, who will talk to us about

1:32:33

tall structures on land

1:32:35

seismic.

1:32:37

He is a Mexican civil engineer and one of the

1:32:41

main Latin American authorities

1:32:43

in structural design,

1:32:46

seismic engineering and reinforced concrete

1:32:49

and prestressed. With over 35 years of

1:32:52

experience has led projects of

1:32:55

high complexity, contributing to

1:32:58

international regulatory development.

1:33:01

He stands out as a professor and lecturer

1:33:03

for promoting engineering based on

1:33:06

technical rigor, ethics and judgment

1:33:09

professional. Welcome.

1:33:21

Thank you so much. This, sorry, they'll have the

1:33:24

changing table.

1:34:17

Yes. Well, well, well. Yeah,

1:34:22

This one is like that.

1:34:26

No,

1:34:32

It's not there. You don't have another one

1:34:35

because it doesn't change

1:34:36

This is because

1:34:38

Yeah.

1:34:48

Or do they want me to change something?

1:34:52

you.

1:34:57

No no.

1:35:10

If there's nothing to give him. Yeah.

1:35:30

I'm telling you, give it to them.

1:35:32

Next, right?

1:35:35

Yes, because otherwise they do the difficult things. Yeah,

1:35:39

It's perfect on the first try.

1:35:47

Well, this one a little bit, sorry, the

1:35:51

technical details.

1:35:53

This sounds very strange.

1:35:57

Okay, can you hear me okay? All the way there

1:35:59

back?

1:36:01

Yes. Perfect. Well, um, well, many

1:36:04

thanks to the Catholic University of

1:36:06

Cuenca, thank you for this invitation, and for me it is

1:36:09

a great honor and also impressive

1:36:12

venue where I'm going to give this

1:36:14

conference. Hey, I've been lucky.

1:36:17

of giving lectures, more than 1000

1:36:20

conferences in 24 countries. Uh, but without

1:36:23

However, let me tell you a story. He

1:36:26

first country where I gave a lecture

1:36:30

southern Mexico, always given in States

1:36:32

United States, in Canada, it was Ecuador in

1:36:35

Guayaquil, a course I gave in the

1:36:37

Catholic University of Guayaquil, and which for me

1:36:41

I hold him in my heart because he was the

1:36:42

first one who opened doors for me that

1:36:44

There were more important countries to the south

1:36:48

of those that were in the north and from there

1:36:50

Well, I gave almost everything.

1:36:53

Latin America.

1:36:55

Okay, let's see here.

1:36:58

different aspects. I say, this is

1:37:02

a forum, mostly for students,

1:37:05

which makes me proud and

1:37:08

It's always a pleasure to express my

1:37:10

knowledge, because to the future

1:37:13

generations. These are going to be the ones that

1:37:15

They're really going to be the next ones

1:37:18

cities. These are the ones we are going to criticize.

1:37:20

the current cities and we are going to be

1:37:23

best cities. So, what is the

1:37:25

What are the problems of cities? Well, the

1:37:27

population, the high density. And you

1:37:30

You see it, we suffer from the traffic, from the

1:37:33

infrastructure shortage,

1:37:36

eh of the problems of the

1:37:38

infrastructure, pipe breaks,

1:37:41

This breakdown in communication,

1:37:45

etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So,

1:37:47

What do we need to do in the cities?

1:37:49

Densify them. And to be able to

1:37:51

Densifying means building vertically.

1:37:55

Cuenca is still very flat, but

1:37:58

It can no longer continue to grow horizontally.

1:38:01

Because otherwise we're going to reach a point

1:38:04

in which the transfers

1:38:06

They are very important, we lose many

1:38:10

hours of life. So, next,

1:38:13

Sorry, I don't have the changing table, it's not there.

1:38:15

working. This was something that made me

1:38:18

reflect on last year. I went to Turin

1:38:20

for some tests we were going to do on

1:38:23

some concrete beams, sorry,

1:38:27

that sometimes I say, here I know they use

1:38:30

more concrete. Well, concrete is the same.

1:38:32

that specific. So, when I say,

1:38:34

concrete is concrete. This, and we went to

1:38:37

Turin, and we had time because...

1:38:41

Another day we arrived in the afternoon, the other

1:38:43

day was the rehearsal and apart from that was

1:38:47

the city's national day. So

1:38:50

It was very interesting. I went to, sorry,

1:38:53

Uh, one after that. We arrived at the very

1:38:57

center where all the buildings are located

1:38:59

historical and the first question, what

1:39:02

Why is that building there? a building of

1:39:05

height. I said, it seemed very

1:39:07

interesting. Look, back then,

1:39:09

When was it built?

1:39:11

1950

1:39:14

Forgiveness, 1940.

1:39:16

And I was telling them,

1:39:19

"And what is this building doing here?" I mean,

1:39:21

I understand that it needs to be densified,

1:39:23

I understand that the building needs to be built.

1:39:25

at his peak, but what does he do?

1:39:29

competing with the main square?

1:39:33

Do you know who did it? Benito Mussolini

1:39:37

It was a power problem, it wasn't a

1:39:39

economic problem, it wasn't a problem

1:39:42

Thinking about the city was a problem

1:39:45

of power, a symbol of power. What are you doing

1:39:48

there with a pedestrian zone, streets

1:39:51

narrow?

1:39:53

It doesn't make sense at a city level. Yeah.

1:39:57

However, the next one, now yes

1:40:01

Let's go to another part of the city, nearby

1:40:03

from the university, in fact, and see

1:40:07

wide roads, means of

1:40:10

communication in which people who

1:40:13

If you want to go downtown, you can go easily.

1:40:17

So, I understand the concept that

1:40:20

We can do things better. the next one.

1:40:24

So, what do we have to do for the

1:40:26

structural design? I dedicate myself to

1:40:28

structural design, basically.

1:40:30

So, I have to define the

1:40:33

forces. It's not the same to design alone

1:40:36

for forces of nature that

1:40:38

gravitational forces.

1:40:40

And I always say, gravitational forces

1:40:43

I do it even in my sleep.

1:40:45

Because? Because it's the only thing we have

1:40:47

What we need to see is how to distribute the forces

1:40:49

to resist gravity. It's that easy.

1:40:53

But the forces of nature

1:40:55

We have all possible variables.

1:40:59

Do you agree? What is wind?

1:41:01

which obviously in Ecuador thanks to its a

1:41:04

its geographical position, because the winds

1:41:07

They are very moderate, very, practically

1:41:10

There's no wind, is there? 30 km/h, when a

1:41:14

The hurricane reaches 200 km/h, that is, we are

1:41:17

talking about a completely different scale. and

1:41:20

in earthquakes,

1:41:22

That's where we do have that issue in the

1:41:26

Ecuador, right?, and in other parts of

1:41:28

world. So, those are the two effects and

1:41:31

They are very different, even though it is the

1:41:33

nature, they are completely different.

1:41:38

The wind is something I can predict,

1:41:41

I can at least protect life

1:41:44

human, however, an earthquake is not. he

1:41:46

An earthquake can happen at any moment and

1:41:49

I have to be prepared for it.

1:41:51

TRUE? Yes. Well, one of the

1:41:54

examples that I always say are unique in

1:41:56

the world, but you have to know and you have to

1:41:59

to understand and why engineering

1:42:01

Mexican women have been so recognized

1:42:05

globally, because nobody in full

1:42:08

The judge decides to build the city

1:42:11

largest in the country on a lake.

1:42:17

And it wasn't the Aztecs, eh, it

1:42:19

I confess. The Aztecs were in the

1:42:22

center, on the islets, that's where they had their

1:42:26

constructions

1:42:27

And when the Spanish arrived, it was necessary to

1:42:30

crush the native culture and

1:42:33

Then they started saying, "Look, that

1:42:37

"They're building on the lake."

1:42:40

They didn't understand what the islets were and

1:42:41

They started to dry up that lake.

1:42:46

The next one. And here you see, see it

1:42:49

that they were advanced. As they always say,

1:42:52

The Europeans were saying, it's not that here

1:42:54

They were pure barbarians and pure people who

1:42:57

I didn't know. Yes, I knew. That dam of

1:43:00

Saalcoyot built it. And do you know why?

1:43:03

that? To separate fresh water from water

1:43:06

salty. To the left is the water.

1:43:09

To the right is the fresh water, to the right is the salt water.

1:43:12

What is the purpose of fresh water? It's life. There

1:43:15

They even made floating farms

1:43:19

on the right side. It's useless.

1:43:23

The next one.

1:43:25

Because of that, look, that's the glass that

1:43:28

We have there where we see the periods

1:43:31

or the movement of the ground. AND

1:43:34

obviously where we have the center of

1:43:37

That lake has the longest periods and

1:43:41

This works like a bucket of jelly.

1:43:44

That's why we have earthquakes everywhere.

1:43:46

sides, wherever. In Mexico City

1:43:48

There are no tremors, but we feel it.

1:43:50

everywhere. And we need to understand that

1:43:52

phenomenon to know the seismic design.

1:43:56

And why are they going to Mexico to learn? Well

1:43:59

That's why, because we really have things

1:44:02

unique. First, our movement is

1:44:05

sinusoidal. We see in the books

1:44:07

that sinusoidal motion and always

1:44:10

Our teachers say, "No, this is

1:44:12

theorist. Actually, that doesn't happen. In

1:44:15

It does happen in Mexico. The next one.

1:44:20

That's the city. In the 60s we built

1:44:23

the Latin American Tower, which is the

1:44:25

tall building, which was the tallest building

1:44:27

high in a high seismicity zone in

1:44:32

the world. Nobody dared because

1:44:35

They said, "How can there be a

1:44:37

tall building in a high-rise area

1:44:39

seismicity." in 1920 so you understand, the

1:44:43

the first regulation, which was when it was made

1:44:46

the first regulation in Mexico, in the

1:44:48

Mexico City, and do you know what it said?

1:44:51

They only built no more than three

1:44:54

floors.

1:44:55

Because? Because we were afraid that

1:44:57

a tall building suffered more from the

1:45:00

tremors. That's false. The buildings. Yes

1:45:03

They ask me where I want to feel

1:45:07

an earthquake, if I go, there will be an earthquake

1:45:09

earthquake in a 50-story building. AND

1:45:12

Everyone admires each other. Why in

1:45:15

50 floors? Because I'm safer here.

1:45:18

than in a medium-sized building by the

1:45:21

soil characteristics. So,

1:45:24

This was Mexico City in the 60s,

1:45:26

the next one.

1:45:31

And there stands the Latin American Tower. 140

1:45:34

m. Now it already looks like a building

1:45:36

It's normal within the city, but...

1:45:40

He broke all the paradigms. They don't have

1:45:42

hydraulic jacks and I don't know what else

1:45:44

They put out strange theories. It was a building

1:45:49

designed with a California earthquake

1:45:52

which has nothing to do with it, but it was the

1:45:54

The only thing that existed in 1940 was the earthquake that

1:45:57

It was detected, and then they did it.

1:46:00

Thank God he was so tall that it worked out

1:46:04

with the tremor they assumed was going to

1:46:07

have. Notice how they say, like in

1:46:10

football now that the World Cup is on,

1:46:12

No? They say a goalkeeper without luck is no good.

1:46:14

goalie. Equally structuralist as not

1:46:18

He who is unlucky is not a structuralist.

1:46:20

No? So the personality that designed

1:46:24

This, Leonardo Sebart, this one who, well,

1:46:28

He guessed right, they checked him in Illinois with

1:46:31

Newark and Newmark said, "It's okay the

1:46:33

building." And they were both wrong. And

1:46:36

Another error is based on the first one,

1:46:41

Well, what they thought was the ground

1:46:43

firm, which was 30 m, there is a 2 m layer

1:46:47

of compacted sand and that's where it's resting. AND

1:46:51

What happened? That it has been drilled, has

1:46:55

drilled the piles into that hard layer and

1:46:59

Thanks to that, the building sinks anyway

1:47:02

than the city. If it had been supported

1:47:06

There, what we would have seen is that the

1:47:08

building as if it were emerging. AND

1:47:10

It's not that it's emerging, but everything

1:47:12

It's sinking all around. The city

1:47:15

It sinks 10 to 15 cm, uh, sorry, to

1:47:19

year. Imagine, 10, 15 cm. In 10 years

1:47:24

It is 1 m.

1:47:26

So we need to understand that

1:47:28

phenomenon and see the surroundings in order to be able to

1:47:33

This means having a usable building.

1:47:36

Let them continue and that's how it's growing.

1:47:39

Where are the buildings growing?

1:47:41

tall? On that avenue. The avenue that

1:47:45

Come there, there's the tower

1:47:46

Latin American on the right, is the

1:47:49

Reforma Avenue, where it is permitted that

1:47:53

have whatever height they want. And why

1:47:55

that? Because we have the infrastructure.

1:47:58

We have to understand that, right? Nothing more than

1:48:00

the technical part. We have five

1:48:03

blocks from a main subway line,

1:48:06

which is actually subway line one.

1:48:08

We have all the infrastructure, all

1:48:10

the networks, the drinking water and everything.

1:48:13

That's where we have to do the rest

1:48:16

and communicate with the rest of the city.

1:48:19

And besides, there are always demonstrations in

1:48:21

that one on that avenue. So, I already know.

1:48:24

It became pedestrianized again, didn't it? There is no power left.

1:48:27

that traffic can be allowed. The next one, by

1:48:29

favor. And there we see how it grows in

1:48:32

buildings on that avenue. The next one,

1:48:37

the next one.

1:48:42

No, it doesn't work. Ah, well, there it is. That

1:48:45

What's happening to us? Our earthquakes

1:48:47

They mainly occur on the coast. No

1:48:50

We necessarily have another type of

1:48:52

earthquakes, but as you can see, they are decreasing

1:48:56

as the colors keep changing and

1:48:58

We arrived in Mexico City, which is

1:49:01

in the central part and that's where it amplifies

1:49:04

precisely

1:49:06

This is the ground, the drum. However, there are

1:49:11

one thing we didn't recognize a few years ago

1:49:14

years and we have seen it and we have

1:49:16

used for future projects. By

1:49:19

That's very important for you in the

1:49:21

school, forget the rules,

1:49:25

Not that they don't respect them, forget about it.

1:49:27

regulations, start learning the

1:49:30

basics, the fundamental concepts, because that

1:49:34

That's what, as Guillermo said, we have

1:49:37

that we adapt

1:49:38

And if we know the concepts

1:49:41

basics, we can make the adaptations

1:49:44

that we have to do for the new ones

1:49:46

designs

1:49:48

And one thing we recognized through,

1:49:51

I'm going to tell you what we've done right now.

1:49:53

currently done with the buildings, which

1:49:56

This is the instrumentation that I'm going to show you.

1:49:58

Finally, we can see that...

1:50:03

The ground, okay, is so soft

1:50:07

It amplifies, but it also dampens.

1:50:11

So that interaction that he

1:50:13

we call it soil structure and that

1:50:15

We were saying, "What is this?", well

1:50:17

Just imagine that the building

1:50:20

It has some basements. Those basements have

1:50:24

perimeter walls and that one is in

1:50:28

contact with the ground. When it moves

1:50:30

What does the building do with the ground? is

1:50:34

a natural damping

1:50:38

and reduces the forces by up to 50-60%

1:50:44

that we didn't take into account before and

1:50:47

Obviously we're going to make better designs

1:50:50

more efficient taking that into account. The

1:50:53

what follows.

1:50:55

And here we see the entire series of tremors.

1:50:57

Mexico is within Mexico, Japan, and Chile

1:51:01

possibly, and there's Indonesia too

1:51:04

many tremors. Possibly in the

1:51:06

world where we have more frequent

1:51:09

tremors, which gives us a great

1:51:13

advantage. I mean, people don't want to see

1:51:16

tremors. Well, the engineers did.

1:51:17

because we learn more every day. That

1:51:20

Did this happen in Venezuela? And he gave it very briefly,

1:51:23

I wasn't prepared, but since

1:51:25

happened. Venezuela's last earthquake was

1:51:28

in 1967.

1:51:31

In '67 we didn't have the knowledge

1:51:33

current seismic design.

1:51:36

Then they made their

1:51:38

modifications like everyone else does.

1:51:40

Don't think you live on another planet. It

1:51:43

They do it right away, they do it right away

1:51:44

adaptations. However, what happened

1:51:48

They made the adaptations, but

1:51:51

very early. Because? we didn't have the

1:51:53

knowledge that we currently have and

1:51:55

then comes a dictatorial regime that

1:51:58

Well, it didn't allow progress, did it? The one that

1:52:02

go on,

1:52:06

Sorry, we see that...

1:52:08

characteristics of earthquakes are very

1:52:11

different. An earthquake is not like an earthquake

1:52:13

another one, and we have to acknowledge that.

1:52:17

So when we design a

1:52:19

We need to design a building for

1:52:21

different scenarios. Watch the earthquake

1:52:24

from 2017 and curiously if they want

1:52:27

to feel an earthquake in the city of

1:52:28

Mexico, go on September 19th. It is in

1:52:31

the only country that has had three earthquakes

1:52:34

the same day. So, 2017, 2085,

1:52:39

September 19. And see the difference.

1:52:43

total of how the damage was. The damages

1:52:46

In 2017 they were located from north to

1:52:50

south in a period of soil of a

1:52:53

second.

1:52:55

However, in '85 it was basically in

1:52:59

the lake area the collapses, damage

1:53:02

and collapses concentrated in a period of

1:53:05

2 seconds. So, imagine, the

1:53:07

Norma said, "In 2 seconds it's there

1:53:10

peak, after 2 seconds it doesn't happen

1:53:13

nothing, you could live in less than 2 seconds

1:53:17

Okay, and then suddenly 2017 tells you, "No,

1:53:20

You don't know what, the 2 seconds

1:53:22

They disappeared, you're not a second."

1:53:25

And what we calibrated for 2

1:53:28

seconds, now it's one second. That's why

1:53:30

We need to understand the concepts well,

1:53:33

TRUE? Yes.

1:53:36

Well, look, this is going to happen everywhere

1:53:40

the major cities in Ecuador. Already

1:53:42

It began, especially in Guayaquil, with the

1:53:45

Maximum Tower that they gave me

1:53:46

opportunity to participate, which

1:53:49

I was very happy because for me my

1:53:51

passion after all part of

1:53:54

structures, because they were the buildings

1:53:56

high places where I've had to play, well, uh

1:53:58

participate in virtually all of those

1:54:01

buildings of some kind, right? AND

1:54:04

So some are in the majority in

1:54:07

Mexico City and then in

1:54:10

Monterrey, which is the second largest city and

1:54:12

Guadalajara follows, this one is next,

1:54:18

the next one.

1:54:20

And we see now the last ones that we

1:54:24

We built the COI tower that's there, that one

1:54:26

It was our design and we broke them all

1:54:30

paradigms and there is always something to be done,

1:54:33

You as students always have

1:54:35

to see what we can do differently. The

1:54:39

The construction industry is a

1:54:40

very conservative industry. Because?

1:54:43

because they are afraid. It's there

1:54:46

a lot of money involved and sometimes doing

1:54:49

a modification

1:54:52

It's not that simple. Thank God, all

1:54:55

my life in the 48 years that I have

1:54:57

In design, I have always broken paradigms.

1:55:00

I'm telling you, why can't we do something?

1:55:02

better?

1:55:04

We're going to do this, we're going to use

1:55:05

These new materials, we're going to

1:55:07

use other theories and always

1:55:10

have that concern, don't think, "Ah, it

1:55:14

I did well." Once we were in a

1:55:17

There were two engineers at the meeting. I them

1:55:19

I did a project review and

1:55:21

Two engineers were talking amongst themselves

1:55:23

them, the one from soil mechanics, the

1:55:25

geotechnical engineer and structural engineer. AND

1:55:28

They were, do you remember this project and

1:55:31

Do you remember the other project? treating

1:55:32

to impress me and the owner

1:55:36

who had done many projects and

1:55:39

So they had me fed up, I mean,

1:55:41

I already said it, I already told you, listen, I already

1:55:45

I understood that they had done something in their

1:55:47

life many projects, but they have

1:55:49

done well,

1:55:51

They didn't say anything again.

1:55:54

So, in Torrecoy,

1:55:57

the tallest building at that time

1:55:59

It was 230 m high. Torreco was going to

1:56:04

have 280

1:56:06

m high.

1:56:09

Up until the 230, all had been from

1:56:12

steel, metal structure or

1:56:15

compound.

1:56:16

None had been completely

1:56:19

concrete.

1:56:20

We did it with a signature in

1:56:22

New York. The first question that I

1:56:25

They did it in New York, Roberto, you then

1:56:27

You know the Mexican market,

1:56:31

What are we going to do it with? About what

1:56:33

material? The one who asked me was

1:56:34

specialist in metal structures and

1:56:38

I told her, "Ania, make it out of concrete." Of

1:56:41

Specifically, "Yes, we're going to do it

1:56:43

Specifically, but it's not that they're the

1:56:45

Tall buildings are not made of concrete.

1:56:47

"We're going to make it out of concrete." And so it was.

1:56:49

concrete.

1:56:51

Because? Because it's cheaper.

1:56:54

We must also provide this in schools.

1:56:56

an emphasis on learning everything that is

1:57:00

the theory of concrete. There is concrete

1:57:03

Understanding it isn't easy, is it? But

1:57:07

It is the cheapest material and it must be

1:57:09

to know, and one must know, the mixtures, and there are

1:57:11

to know that today we are still in the

1:57:15

school, and I say, I don't want to get involved in

1:57:17

They were lazy, but they still taught me

1:57:19

Portland cement.

1:57:22

Try to get the cement now.

1:57:25

Portland. It no longer exists, there is no more

1:57:27

Portland cement. And they taught you in the

1:57:29

Portland cement school. And I speak to them

1:57:31

to my friends who do the

1:57:35

I get specific and say to them, "Hey, and where

1:57:37

"What happened to the Portland cement?" Well, in the

1:57:39

books and in past books. the one that

1:57:42

go on.

1:57:44

Oh ok. And after COY, well, it's already known

1:57:46

They also built two other buildings.

1:57:48

only concrete, because you already saw it.

1:57:51

that it is possible to build a building of

1:57:53

concrete so high and right now it's

1:57:54

building one 400 m high that

1:57:58

It will be among the 100 buildings

1:57:59

tallest in the world. This building that

1:58:03

I had to check it; it was the first one that was good.

1:58:06

the highest in Latin America also in

1:58:08

His time, about 25 or 30 years ago,

1:58:12

No, like 30 years and it was done

1:58:17

repairing shock absorbers because he was

1:58:20

the trend of installing shock absorbers, of

1:58:22

reduce the forces because that was

1:58:25

efficient according to them.

1:58:27

First, they've already had to change the

1:58:29

shock absorbers because they were like

1:58:31

by car, the Taylors who called him,

1:58:34

which were pistons this big and

1:58:37

The oil leaked out without shaking.

1:58:40

It hasn't worked; it moves more than others.

1:58:42

buildings that we were able to review and that

1:58:45

They don't have shock absorbers that are there

1:58:47

in front of this building. But it was

1:58:51

something new. I proved that I didn't

1:58:54

No shock absorbers were needed,

1:58:56

But they had already sold the news in the

1:58:59

Discovery Channel, and you can see that there...

1:59:02

It's cloudy and all that,

1:59:05

Well, in the end it didn't work at all.

1:59:08

No? $10 million thrown away

1:59:10

trash, right? But anyway, next time. AND

1:59:14

There it was, that was the shock absorber.

1:59:16

there in the middle of that cross. It's not from

1:59:18

This building, but here I had a photo

1:59:22

This one from that device, and there it is. Were

1:59:26

adas and Taylor. This was from some plates

1:59:29

made of neoprene. The truth is no longer used. It

1:59:32

which follows

1:59:35

It's over.

1:59:37

Let's see,

1:59:42

They already saved about 80 slides,

1:59:46

No? If you want, you can turn off presentation mode.

1:59:49

and pass it on. That's all, but upload it for

1:59:53

above.

1:59:55

I had never given such a lecture before.

1:59:57

fast. The next one, the ...

1:59:59

go on

2:00:01

Upwards, upwards, upwards

2:00:03

Upwards, upwards, upwards.

2:00:07

Up,

2:00:09

Up, up, up.

2:00:14

Further up.

2:00:19

Now down.

2:00:26

More, more, more, more, more,

2:00:31

more, more, more, more.

2:00:34

That's why I like to present in my

2:00:36

computer, but already there. Well, like

2:00:40

Come on, it's already a 200m tall building

2:00:44

Height is an everyday thing and

2:00:47

In fact, it's a good height. When

2:00:49

We're going to decide what height

2:00:52

We have the building, we have to do

2:00:54

Well, many of the things he does

2:00:55

Guillermo, right? Conduct studies

2:00:58

financial and not just saying, "I'm going to

2:01:00

to be the tallest building in the world."

2:01:02

Ask the United Arab Emirates about it.

2:01:06

Bush Khalifa, what are they doing with that

2:01:08

The building is not even finished, it's not even complete.

2:01:11

Maybe it's not occupied yet because it

2:01:14

Did they make it very big? But it was to prove

2:01:17

The world, he was an icon of the city and

2:01:19

is. It's an icon of the city. Waterfront

2:01:22

Center in Chile is empty.

2:01:27

So, to build a building just for the sake of building and

2:01:29

Doing great things, not just for the sake of doing great things

2:01:31

works. A study needs to be done

2:01:34

former. Don't move it anymore. But another one of

2:01:38

The things you have to see are that no

2:01:41

We can make boring buildings. Yeah

2:01:43

When you go to New York, you're surprised.

2:01:45

because of the large buildings, because they are

2:01:47

Boring buildings are buildings

2:01:50

square, well, rectangular. And right now

2:01:52

Let's see the difference in the new ones

2:01:54

buildings. This is quite a building

2:01:59

complicated. Because? Because they are bodies

2:02:02

that are born, there are three, in fact, and that

2:02:05

They join at the floor, more or less, 23 24.

2:02:11

The three bodies join there.

2:02:15

I was telling him when I checked this

2:02:17

builder, "Be careful because the

2:02:20

specifically, and because it is necessary to understand the

2:02:22

concrete deforms and continues

2:02:25

deforming. One touches the concrete and says,

2:02:28

"It's hard, now, now, it's over."

2:02:31

reaction." No, the reaction of the concrete.

2:02:33

It lasts almost 30 years. In 30 years it is still going on

2:02:38

deforming and then they didn't make me

2:02:40

case. They arrived at the place where they had to meet.

2:02:44

And, oh, surprise, there were centimeters of

2:02:46

difference. Ah, well, I fill it with

2:02:48

concrete. No, wait for me, your building is already

2:02:51

It became crooked. It had become crooked and says,

2:02:54

"Well, nothing happened, because I already..."

2:02:56

I joined, nobody knows anymore and it's not visible, right? Yeah.

2:03:00

The problem with elevators is that

2:03:02

They still don't know how to walk on a bend,

2:03:05

So what happened? They had to

2:03:07

change the cabins. So, all this

2:03:10

These are the kinds of things you have to understand. But

2:03:12

Look, the project looks nice, doesn't it?

2:03:15

There are many architects here,

2:03:17

Well, we can't deny that that building

2:03:21

It's prettier than one of the ones in New York.

2:03:23

York, right? The next one. See them all

2:03:26

These challenges of buildings and all

2:03:29

They are around 200 m. The one that

2:03:32

go on.

2:03:35

The next one.

2:03:39

And this is the tallest building today

2:03:41

in Mexico City, 260,

2:03:44

267 m high that they used for

2:03:49

first time a concept called

2:03:52

outrigger and we'll explain it now

2:03:54

the next one.

2:03:57

Before that, sorry, I'm going to... do a

2:04:01

very quick study

2:04:03

for the concrete industry. Does

2:04:06

a few years, and it was 25 years, uh, they told me,

2:04:10

"Hey, I'm seeing a lot of structure

2:04:13

metal

2:04:15

and see the falseness of things. I'm

2:04:18

Looking at the metal structure, why not?

2:04:20

"contaminates." The topics of

2:04:22

Sustainability, he says, "Does not pollute. The

2:04:25

Concrete is indeed dirty, you go to the construction sites and

2:04:29

It's all very dirty, so I'm going to

2:04:31

make it metallic. And then

2:04:35

There was one issue that the dollar

2:04:38

It was too low for us and then

2:04:41

We no longer use the peso. The dollar

2:04:44

It was very cheap, so the price of

2:04:47

The price of the metal is based on the dollar and

2:04:51

Then there was a real boom and I

2:04:54

They said, "Hey, Roberto, this

2:04:57

It is true that the structure is metallic

2:05:00

"It's cheaper than concrete," he said.

2:05:02

I say, "No." And then they asked me for this

2:05:05

study, a study was done

2:05:07

Very simple structure, isn't it?

2:05:10

columns and make it the most efficient in

2:05:13

concrete and steel, taking from the

2:05:16

foundation, that is, all the

2:05:19

factors. The next one. And then

2:05:22

We did low seismicity and high

2:05:24

seismicity because they said with high

2:05:26

seismicity means more weight, more mass

2:05:29

From concrete, then steel

2:05:32

It has to be. And look, it went from 6 to 30

2:05:36

levels to cover a whole range of

2:05:39

levels. And look, in low seismicity,

2:05:42

One of them said, perfect, everything turns out better

2:05:46

cheap in concrete. But now we move on

2:05:49

the next one. High seismicity.

2:05:54

To my surprise, the difference is greater.

2:05:58

that we thought it wasn't. And the other

2:06:00

The thing is, for example, there were 21 to

2:06:03

24 floors, one would think the more

2:06:07

tall, more expensive, and we saw that it

2:06:11

leveled. The next one.

2:06:14

Well, what do steel and...

2:06:15

concrete? purely material

2:06:20

We have a reduction of between 30 and 40% of

2:06:24

the seismic response. Because? Because

2:06:27

There is more interaction between the particles.

2:06:31

of the material.

2:06:33

Wow, that's a big deal for the

2:06:35

concrete. The next one.

2:06:39

This is a set

2:06:41

of buildings for one for one

2:06:43

Spanish developer that I know

2:06:46

I worked in Mexico. We did 35

2:06:49

projects for them and one day he told me

2:06:52

the director, because he always...

2:06:54

I was still designing that project.

2:06:57

He was designing consulting services at that time.

2:07:01

And Roberto was telling me,

2:07:03

I'm sorry to say this, but he says "to the devil."

2:07:05

The architecture you have the most structure

2:07:08

efficient and that the architect now to

2:07:11

On the contrary, the architect gets himself into a mess.

2:07:13

making the interior of the

2:07:16

departments. I said, "Okay, 36 and 38

2:07:20

levels. The next one.

2:07:24

The next one.

2:07:26

This is the structure, a central core

2:07:30

and columns.

2:07:32

It was the cheapest of the eight in that

2:07:35

area we designed,

2:07:38

the others being 23, 25, 28 and

2:07:41

etc. This one is taller and cheaper,

2:07:45

the next one. And look at the core, it's not

2:07:48

rather than clearly defining the core at the level

2:07:51

of the services, elevators and stairs

2:07:55

and orient the columns where they were more

2:07:59

efficient.

2:08:01

And that was achieved, and architecture made it possible.

2:08:04

solve. The next one,

2:08:06

There's another scene. Monterrey time,

2:08:09

as these great ones begin to see

2:08:11

buildings. The next one.

2:08:14

And Puebla is no exception either

2:08:17

that one sees that the building is rotating

2:08:19

and all. Do you know how it's done? The

2:08:22

The structure is uniform, only with

2:08:25

overhangs and you can give it that shape.

2:08:28

The next one,

2:08:30

Cancun, the next one, the most

2:08:33

Cancun highlands. Look at the destruction

2:08:36

that we have made ecological.

2:08:40

We have a strip of only about 100

2:08:43

m wide

2:08:47

And we built all those buildings.

2:08:49

tiny because the rule said no more

2:08:52

of 10, 12 floors and we destroyed all the

2:08:56

nature. Of course, you arrive in Cancun and

2:08:58

He sees the sea and says, "How beautiful the sea is."

2:09:00

He forgets all the destruction. But

2:09:02

That's what I got on the rooftop of

2:09:05

building that we designed. I said, "I'm going to

2:09:07

Take a picture and we'll see the damage."

2:09:10

The next one.

2:09:13

Look at the global trend in buildings

2:09:15

tall. It's exponential. The blue 200 m of

2:09:19

height,

2:09:21

green 300 m high. is the future of

2:09:25

really the big cities. The one that

2:09:27

It continues, there are the definitions, the

2:09:31

mega

2:09:33

Mega-talls, where are they? Well, in China,

2:09:36

because that's where the main one is.

2:09:38

population. There are cities of 120 million

2:09:41

of inhabitants.

2:09:44

How do they manage to live there? All

2:09:46

Mexico in a city.

2:09:49

If they don't build those buildings, there's no way.

2:09:51

There is a way to live there. It wouldn't be possible

2:09:54

move. The next one.

2:09:58

Of the 100 tallest buildings in

2:10:00

world, steel. There are only seven

2:10:04

steel structures in the 1910s

2:10:06

buildings. Forget it. If they are going to study

2:10:09

metal structures,

2:10:11

Study it as a reference. Therefore

2:10:14

The rest won't use it. The next one.

2:10:19

To work in these tall buildings

2:10:21

We need to work as a team. Which

2:10:24

Guillermo was saying, we have to do

2:10:26

team among all participants,

2:10:30

if they're not going to be the most

2:10:32

inefficient of the world.

2:10:35

If we don't include architecture,

2:10:37

facilities, vertical transportation,

2:10:41

The operation of elevators is

2:10:43

fundamental.

2:10:45

facade, structure and construction.

2:10:48

Someone asked me, "Hey, why don't you

2:10:50

We make it prefabricated and we make it very

2:10:53

"Quickly?" I said, "Perfect,

2:10:56

lifts a 25-ton piece

2:11:00

at a height of 300 m.

2:11:04

There's no crane that can lift that. And if there is,

2:11:08

It's going to cost 100 or 1000 times more than

2:11:11

lift the concrete with a pipe.

2:11:14

The next one.

2:11:16

This is the concept of outrigado.

2:11:19

It's basically opening your arms to

2:11:23

to have more stability of the building. The

2:11:26

What's next, what's next. And that's it, that

2:11:29

That's the concept. Imagine that

2:11:33

If I didn't have those walking sticks, well, I'd

2:11:35

I move easily. Now put two

2:11:37

walking sticks, because it's not so easy anymore. Yeah,

2:11:40

It's such a simple concept. But what

2:11:43

What does the next one represent?

2:11:46

The following represent putting there. Yeah

2:11:49

We don't have it in the first one, if we don't have it

2:11:52

those sticks, because it moves

2:11:54

building. We put one all the way up, it

2:11:58

moves the fourth part. Yes, but what

2:12:02

happens? that the upper floor is the most

2:12:04

valuable

2:12:06

and then put the floor there, more of it

2:12:09

rigid, because I remove the most profitable floor.

2:12:13

So, we need to know where

2:12:15

place them. This is ideally where you

2:12:17

should place. And one day in a

2:12:19

a young boy project who was

2:12:21

While designing it, he tells me, "Here I'm going to..."

2:12:24

"Put it on." I tell him, "Well, ask him."

2:12:25

"First the architect, right?" he asks.

2:12:28

I asked the architect, "Are you crazy?"

2:12:29

"How am I going to fit it in there?" No, that's it

2:12:32

where I have the main lobby and what

2:12:34

So, where do we put them? First, it has

2:12:37

that is a building

2:12:39

60, 70 floors for the outrigers

2:12:42

It works. It all depends on how big

2:12:45

be my core. If my core is very

2:12:47

Big, I don't need outriggers. If so

2:12:50

I'm getting slimmer, I'm going to need more

2:12:52

soon the outrigers. Yes. And those are going to

2:12:57

be the mechanical floors where I have

2:13:00

all elevator equipment,

2:13:02

where I have the repumping, the one that

2:13:05

go on.

2:13:07

And this before going into the building because

2:13:10

I already mentioned that there's no clock here, but

2:13:12

Well. This, then

2:13:15

This is a building we were going to build,

2:13:17

The BBVA tower is on the right.

2:13:21

The one on the left was going to be a new one.

2:13:23

What do we use? precisely the

2:13:27

instrumentation that we're about to see

2:13:29

to reduce seismic forces by 40%.

2:13:35

That was the building then.

2:13:38

which unfortunately when it changes

2:13:42

The investor said to the government, "I already

2:13:44

"I'm not investing in this building." But it is

2:13:46

the most iconic building. Because?

2:13:50

Because they cannot go west

2:13:54

Nothing needs to be built, all the parks are there.

2:13:56

and museums in Mexico City.

2:13:58

So, imagine the place

2:14:00

privileged that he has. However,

2:14:03

Well, that's where the next one stayed. And here

2:14:07

The next one, see what it was like

2:14:10

Outriger concept, which we use in

2:14:13

Torrecoy for the first time. They are no longer the

2:14:16

armor in the middle of the floor that one does not

2:14:19

They can be moved; they are rings that we make.

2:14:23

on the facade.

2:14:25

The next one.

2:14:27

And we use the modern technique of

2:14:31

which they call a buckling contracture

2:14:34

restricted. I have the diagonal, if I

2:14:38

I reach the compression point, it will buckle.

2:14:40

its weak side.

2:14:42

This penetrates, it doesn't fail, but

2:14:46

penetrates and then actually forms a

2:14:49

fuse. When the earthquake is very large

2:14:52

It's going to penetrate, the tremor ends, the

2:14:55

The building remains undamaged and that

2:14:58

unscrew the device

2:15:01

and you change it and the building returns to

2:15:05

to function at 100%. The next one.

2:15:08

Well, we see here that the earthquake and this is

2:15:12

a representation, perhaps some do not

2:15:15

They understand it very well, but the higher up

2:15:18

the building, the period, what they call,

2:15:21

which is the time it takes for one cycle

2:15:24

full range of motion,

2:15:27

The higher it is, the longer the period it has.

2:15:30

So, the first way, go

2:15:32

accelerations, this axis are

2:15:34

accelerations, see very very accelerations

2:15:37

lows

2:15:39

And that's why tall buildings are the

2:15:41

safer, but you have to consider the

2:15:45

higher modes. The next one.

2:15:50

Well, something that is very important for

2:15:53

a tall building, if we let it

2:15:55

Displace, we are dead.

2:15:58

What we have to do is make sure it doesn't happen.

2:16:01

Displace more than you should. This is

2:16:04

the behavior curve, which is the

2:16:08

what we have to do. But I know the one

2:16:11

go on. But if I don't have it, well, I'll tell you

2:16:14

You passed by, there it is. If I'm not careful

2:16:17

of immediate occupation, when it begins to

2:16:20

If there is any damage, the building collapses.

2:16:23

if I don't take that care. So, in

2:16:26

My analysis shows that

2:16:29

that happens and that's where the analyses are done, no

2:16:31

linear and the performance part. Have

2:16:34

Check this out, it's very important in a

2:16:37

building of this height, the next one. AND

2:16:40

Here are the different ones

2:16:43

performance-based design concepts, which

2:16:45

when there are small tremors there is no

2:16:48

damage and that we can recover as much as possible

2:16:51

as soon as possible. And as the earthquake progresses

2:16:55

Being older, what I want is

2:16:57

limit the damage and obviously avoid

2:17:00

the collapse. But this is done with

2:17:03

nonlinear analyses that are already being done today

2:17:07

We have them available. The next one

2:17:11

by wind. Okay, I'll pass this on.

2:17:13

Because, I insist, it's the wind part

2:17:15

I think that

2:17:18

the one that follows because it is omitted.

2:17:21

Okay, leave it there. Check this out. And it's not

2:17:24

Just kidding, huh? This is a model of

2:17:27

Manhattan to see the new buildings.

2:17:31

And the new buildings are that thing

2:17:33

black that they see as a toothpick,

2:17:35

So slim, it seems like a joke, doesn't it? EITHER

2:17:39

Well, one sees New York and the buildings

2:17:41

fat people you see there, one admires them

2:17:45

height and all.

2:17:48

They are not slender. The problem of

2:17:51

tall buildings are not about height, it's about the

2:17:54

slenderness. How much does height have?

2:17:56

total between the base? And those are the

2:17:59

new buildings that we are going to start

2:18:03

see. Less land and more height. The one that

2:18:07

go on,

2:18:10

the next one. Well, here we see another one

2:18:13

problem that we need to understand in the

2:18:16

specifically, and that's why I emphasize

2:18:19

that we have to teach in schools

2:18:23

concrete subjects, not as an elective.

2:18:27

Our university is optional. If I

2:18:29

I ask the boys when

2:18:31

They come out, I'm not even talking about the degree of

2:18:34

the specialty, which is another year,

2:18:38

They don't know how to design concrete, they don't understand.

2:18:41

the concrete until they reach the

2:18:44

real life and that they don't understand it either in

2:18:46

real life, but hey, concrete

2:18:48

It needs to be understood, and concrete is

2:18:51

It cracks, even if you can't see it.

2:18:55

It loses rigidity, and if we don't take it into account...

2:18:59

We are lost in the earthquake. That is

2:19:03

what the little board that is put on, but the

2:19:06

tablita is in its final state,

2:19:10

not in the in the in the different ones. Yeah

2:19:13

There is a small earthquake, the shaking is

2:19:16

very small, it doesn't reach those values ​​of

2:19:18

reduction, and if we don't take that into account,

2:19:22

We're designing it wrong. The next one.

2:19:27

Another thing about concrete is that it needs

2:19:31

of steel. And why does it need the

2:19:33

steel? To confine. It's a problem of

2:19:36

lockdown. He has to endure the

2:19:38

confinement and tensions. And see

2:19:41

This one, the next one. Here we have,

2:19:44

Sorry, the previous one. We have very few

2:19:46

stirrups. See? in the main part

2:19:49

He's lying down like this right now, but we'll see.

2:19:53

1 2 3 cu cco stirrups, yes?

2:19:56

Distributed. The next one.

2:20:01

It's a compression test. There it is. Is

2:20:04

a compression test.

2:20:10

And look at the flaw. That's what we need to avoid.

2:20:14

And someone says, "Hey, but the concrete

2:20:16

It's a rock, can we achieve anything?

2:20:19

"Better?" The next one.

2:20:23

Look, you already saw instead of the five

2:20:25

stirrups, which are the cheapest part of a

2:20:27

work, we put

2:20:31

15 stirrups. Yes. Or 20 stirrups.

2:20:35

The next one.

2:20:37

Now look at the behavior of this

2:20:39

same.

2:20:47

They are watching how it is deforming.

2:20:51

Look.

2:20:54

Impressive, isn't it?

2:20:57

And there's a concrete that's no longer there.

2:20:59

rods, but I'll talk about it later in

2:21:01

The next conferences will be held in a few years.

2:21:05

And look, it's just beginning, but there's no that

2:21:08

brittle failure Yes, the next one.

2:21:15

Well, here we are at the Tower building

2:21:18

Coy, who broke these paradigms 279.5

2:21:24

designed with the Tordon Tomasetti signature

2:21:26

and us. The next one.

2:21:29

I'm going to leave faster. The next one

2:21:32

so they can see the plants. It is a plant

2:21:35

big. That's the core of it

2:21:38

building. The following, plant of

2:21:41

parking lot, the plaza, the next one.

2:21:45

That's where it begins. They are from 5 to 20. First there are

2:21:48

offices, it's mixed use, which is also

2:21:51

very common in these large buildings.

2:21:54

Look at the core with all those walls that

2:21:57

They are more efficient at the bottom.

2:22:00

The next one.

2:22:02

There's the first mechanical floor.

2:22:05

There is nothing in between. There is the core and

2:22:09

a whole useful area for them to put their

2:22:12

teams.

2:22:14

The perimeter walls are forming

2:22:17

that outriger. The next one,

2:22:21

which was the second building in the world

2:22:24

that this type of outrigger was made, by

2:22:26

True, the next amenities

2:22:32

in the residential area, on the floors

2:22:35

tall. And see how that keeps decreasing

2:22:38

core according to the height and also the

2:22:41

The columns are getting smaller. He

2:22:44

another mechanical floor where the

2:22:46

elevators. And look, in the end we don't have

2:22:50

not even a core. Yes, the next one. AND

2:22:54

Therein lies the resilient system, its

2:22:56

a core that is shrinking, is not

2:23:00

symmetrical

2:23:01

the next one. There we both are

2:23:04

rings. The next one

2:23:08

It joins with the slabs

2:23:11

and

2:23:13

interacts with the columns.

2:23:16

The next one. There's the photo of

2:23:19

different stages. The next one.

2:23:23

And look at the outrigger. Someone says that

2:23:27

The outrigger is essential,

2:23:29

it isn't true? The deformation reduces in

2:23:33

one direction 25%.

2:23:35

and in the other only 15%.

2:23:39

Yes, Rodríguez is not essential.

2:23:43

It helps, but it's not essential.

2:23:45

what follows. And see how it returns

2:23:48

deformations. Yes, I mean, we see it there.

2:23:52

clearly where the outers are. The

2:23:55

which follows and there is the building, the one that

2:23:58

go on

2:24:00

the wind tunnel we had to do

2:24:02

Because this is in Monterrey. Monterrey

2:24:05

There was no earthquake, although we did have one

2:24:07

study if he were to see an earthquake that

2:24:10

It happened with the same structure, that is,

2:24:12

no, not spending anything more. the one that follows and

2:24:16

This is the curve of this, that curve has

2:24:21

that are equal to or below the criteria

2:24:26

acceptance or peak acceleration, which is

2:24:29

It's not even a comfort problem.

2:24:31

a security problem, it's so that it doesn't

2:24:34

move around too much. The next one,

2:24:38

the next one. And there you have it, compliance.

2:24:42

that we did. the next one. I mean,

2:24:44

that barely happened. There was an after

2:24:47

of what was built, more was built or

2:24:50

less, it was finished in 2015, it has 11

2:24:53

years, 12 years and a wind happened that

2:24:56

It reached 70%

2:24:59

of the design value

2:25:01

And then that's where it's measured.

2:25:04

go on,

2:25:06

uh, yes, it is, and those statues that were

2:25:09

hanging when I went to visit them

2:25:12

I said, those statues are going to move in a

2:25:15

in a wind. And see how it moved,

2:25:18

especially the fattest one, that's where it comes from

2:25:21

moved.

2:25:23

And do you know who recorded it? The director of

2:25:26

the company that developed that building,

2:25:29

Because I told him, "They're going to move." It began

2:25:32

He detected that there were strong winds and

2:25:37

He started recording it. Nobody found out,

2:25:39

Only he did, and he sent it to me. The next one.

2:25:44

A phenomenon we need to study

2:25:47

when the building is taller and not with

2:25:49

50 floors, that's why we didn't do it in

2:25:51

At most, the concrete deforms and

2:25:56

It becomes deformed over time. If I don't

2:25:59

I'm careful.

2:26:01

between the central core and the columns,

2:26:05

the deformation is different.

2:26:08

Because? Because the wall has more area

2:26:11

regardless of the load it carries. The column has

2:26:13

less area and more load in proportion to

2:26:17

your area. So, what is going to be deformed?

2:26:19

further? The column. And if it becomes more deformed

2:26:22

column, what's going to happen to the

2:26:24

through? And the floors will warp.

2:26:28

So, the floors that were straight

2:26:30

Once construction is finished, they will go to

2:26:33

Let's see a differential of

2:26:36

displacement, and we don't want that. Now,

2:26:39

Torrecoy, as you can see, the building is going into

2:26:43

one in one direction,

2:26:45

what's happening? That its center of gravity is

2:26:48

It moved, and then in the long term it can

2:26:52

deform. So we did that study,

2:26:55

how much it deformed, because if we

2:26:57

we saw during the construction that

2:26:59

It was warping, the builder is going

2:27:02

shooting, right? That's what he can do.

2:27:05

immediately. But if we see

2:27:07

That it's going to go further, what

2:27:10

What would we have done in construction? It

2:27:12

We corrected it.

2:27:14

We're going to the other side inside the

2:27:16

construction. Then, we collapsed the

2:27:18

other side of the columns.

2:27:20

Fortunately, we didn't have to do it.

2:27:22

The next one.

2:27:26

The faster I go in my

2:27:28

construction,

2:27:29

The stronger that effect is, the more it accelerates

2:27:33

the deformation.

2:27:35

So, sometimes the consultant says, "I

2:27:37

I want to go very fast." Yes, but

2:27:39

Wait for me, you have to tell me why

2:27:41

I evaluated it and I can tell you if I have it

2:27:45

that I need to correct or not. The

2:27:47

Let it continue.

2:27:49

And there we see the lateral deformations

2:27:52

due to gravitational loads.

2:27:55

You let go of the model and suddenly you see

2:27:58

how it deforms and one says, "Why does it

2:28:01

deforms? What's going on? Well, it's because

2:28:03

That's the next one

2:28:06

And here it is, and we put it at the end of the

2:28:09

construction and at 30 years old we have to

2:28:13

to do those studies. The next one

2:28:17

Here we implement those columns. By

2:28:20

for the first time in Mexico it was implemented

2:28:23

those columns to know the flow

2:28:26

plastic and contraction, because what

2:28:28

They gave us, the proof they gave us

2:28:31

the one who supplied the concrete didn't get it right

2:28:35

nothing. He gave us, ah, this is the study of

2:28:37

plastic flow. Ah, very good. I didn't have

2:28:40

nothing to do with it. Yes, that one.

2:28:44

Yes. And that's where the distortion lies. There it is

2:28:47

It deformed the line very quickly.

2:28:51

end of construction and continues and

2:28:55

Now they want to remove the instruments.

2:28:56

I'm telling you, over my dead body. If it isn't

2:28:59

Expensive, leave it until age 30. At 30

2:29:02

I'm going to let them remove the for years

2:29:04

instruments because there is no evidence

2:29:07

And that information is pure gold. The one that

2:29:09

go on.

2:29:12

Look at the modulus of elasticity. The module

2:29:14

The elasticity gives us rigidity.

2:29:17

Even the ACI regulations didn't get it right.

2:29:21

nor our regulations. Those are the two.

2:29:23

lines, are the formulas.

2:29:26

Everyone else was more rigid,

2:29:28

fortunately. Because? Because in

2:29:30

Monterrey has very good concrete.

2:29:33

because there are some very good additions and

2:29:35

Then we saw, and that's why it was distorted.

2:29:38

much less than what they told us.

2:29:40

So, once again, we need to get to know each other.

2:29:42

properties of concrete. The next one.

2:29:46

Okay, we're almost done. This was the part

2:29:49

BBVA tower that they let us implement.

2:29:53

And why did they let us use instruments?

2:29:55

Because they finished construction

2:29:58

And they ask me, did they go from six floors to

2:30:02

50 floors. And he asks me the

2:30:06

Spaniards, BBVA is a Spanish bank, me

2:30:09

He says, "Hey, Roberto, what do we do?"

2:30:12

when it shakes?"

2:30:14

The property management office is located at

2:30:16

floor 48.

2:30:18

I told him, "You'll ask me that later."

2:30:20

"When you already have your building." I tell him,

2:30:22

"The truth is, well, start praying because

2:30:25

You won't be able to leave this building.

2:30:28

"It's safe, but you won't be able to." But

2:30:30

I say to him, "Why don't you implement it?"

2:30:32

And what is that? Well, put accelerograms

2:30:35

like accelerographs, like a station

2:30:38

seismological.

2:30:39

They are very cheap nowadays, you can

2:30:42

place. He tells me, "Put them on,

2:30:45

Send me the quote and put them in." No

2:30:48

I had no idea how it was

2:30:50

was implementing a building. Then he

2:30:52

I spoke to my advisor in the United States and he

2:30:54

I said, "Hey, come in, I've got a problem. Okay."

2:30:57

I already sold this and I don't even know how to do it

2:31:00

And well, he already explained it to me and we already put them in.

2:31:02

The next one

2:31:05

That's it. We don't have a central core.

2:31:08

This project.

2:31:10

Do the elevators have drywall or not?

2:31:13

I know what they call this.

2:31:15

As?

2:31:17

Gips has. Then he tells me there we

2:31:20

we put on a tremor. I'm telling you, don't even think about it.

2:31:22

happen. Don't let people congregate there.

2:31:25

store it outside.

2:31:27

Just retreat, don't stay next to

2:31:29

the facades and on each floor is placed the

2:31:33

people. The same one arrives

2:31:37

I'll interpret and let you know in a minute.

2:31:40

bank. They can continue working now, no

2:31:42

There is harm everywhere in the world.

2:31:45

I hope it's not shaking right now.

2:31:46

But what if the signal doesn't reach my phone?

2:31:50

And I tell them, they don't have to worry.

2:31:53

The next one,

2:31:55

There is the structure, the one that follows.

2:31:59

There are the instruments. One was put on

2:32:01

On the ground floor, it was placed at the third, at the

2:32:05

two-thirds and to the rooftop.

2:32:08

Nothing more to correlate against

2:32:10

our nonlinear analytical model. The

2:32:14

what follows.

2:32:17

See the falseness of things. There it is

2:32:20

the building. That's the spectrum he sees

2:32:23

the building. But which spectrum?

2:32:26

of answer? the one about the instruments, no

2:32:29

not the one on the ground.

2:32:32

The closest ones are the one below, which is

2:32:35

Cibeles, and another one which is the UC44 of the

2:32:39

two stations. That's how it's done

2:32:42

regulation. If I'm going to design that

2:32:44

building, the regulations tell me, "Use

2:32:47

That is, unless I have evidence

2:32:50

contrary, and that's why we can reduce the

2:32:53

forces in upcoming projects such as

2:32:56

the one I showed them.

2:32:57

So, the next one and right now we're

2:32:59

in another building that we also reduced

2:33:01

more than 40%. In terms of displacement.

2:33:05

See the difference. If you see, see the

2:33:08

peak that it has of the line with which it

2:33:10

would have designed. Yeah? Do you see the line?

2:33:13

continues?

2:33:14

the next one.

2:33:16

And in 2017, as I said, there were two

2:33:20

tremors. One was on September 7th to

2:33:24

700 km from Mexico City. 8.2

2:33:30

It did not cause any harm to anyone.

2:33:32

construction. And the government began to

2:33:35

to say, "Look how well prepared they are

2:33:36

we are. 8.2 and nothing happened in the

2:33:40

city."

2:33:41

Ah, very good. The next one. He moved

2:33:45

12.9 the BBA tower on the rooftop. When

2:33:49

An engineer tells a client, "It

2:33:52

displaced 12.9

2:33:55

cm." Nobody, unless I measure it. What's more, if

2:33:58

They should have asked me before watching

2:34:00

These results, I would have told them, "1

2:34:03

met"

2:34:06

and I tell him 12.9. The next one.

2:34:10

September 19, 12 days later,

2:34:14

The second earthquake occurs, 7.3

2:34:18

130 km away and knocks down buildings.

2:34:25

Government officials say 7.3

2:34:29

is less than 8.2.

2:34:32

And why do I tear down buildings? For the

2:34:34

distance.

2:34:36

come

2:34:38

understand the basic concepts. The one that

2:34:41

go on,

2:34:43

five times more acceleration saw the

2:34:45

base instrument.

2:34:48

One would think that it's going to move a lot

2:34:51

more and I'm not putting it on right now

2:34:53

Riddle, isn't it? It wasn't even double that.

2:34:56

displacement.

2:35:00

There are many things to understand. I don't know

2:35:02

the building behaved linearly. He should have

2:35:05

to have been proportional.

2:35:07

But what's different?

2:35:10

The dynamic characteristic of the tremor,

2:35:15

the next one.

2:35:19

There are only three left, sorry. Here the

2:35:22

The left side is what they see

2:35:25

instruments, the right side would be the

2:35:28

of the regulations. Wherever you see little balls,

2:35:31

They should fire him right now, wherever they see him.

2:35:32

The little balls are joints, damage.

2:35:36

And then we scaled it to

2:35:41

maximum credible, which is 2,500 years and

2:35:44

whatever. We climbed it. Now yes,

2:35:47

Cornlo, please.

2:35:51

There you see, there the tremor begins. Yes, it is

2:35:53

Start moving. If they see it more, the one from

2:35:56

right, obviously, which is the one on the

2:35:59

Cveles station, the one that was downstairs. AND

2:36:02

look,

2:36:04

Here it hardly moves, and there it already happened

2:36:08

severe damage.

2:36:10

See the difference in understanding the

2:36:13

instrumentation

2:36:14

and not having it. Right now we have four

2:36:17

buildings already equipped.

2:36:21

And finally, the one that follows, the one that

2:36:24

go on,

2:36:26

the next one. It's because he ran away. There.

2:36:29

Look at the difference in displacements.

2:36:31

Do you remember that I told you that you had to

2:36:34

be very careful with the

2:36:35

displacements?

2:36:37

See what the regulations say.

2:36:39

would have happened, which is red, against

2:36:43

the building's dimensions. The next one.

2:36:47

The next one. And what good is it to us?

2:36:48

this? To make the

2:36:51

designs.

2:36:53

Look at the floor displacement, the

2:36:55

a big difference between a design and

2:36:58

other. The next one,

2:37:01

the next one.

2:37:03

And well, this is my teacher and I want

2:37:06

Give three reflections. He said many things

2:37:08

sayings, right?

2:37:11

Yes, he used to say a lot of sayings, and the truth is, a

2:37:14

Great man, isn't he? He made regulations

2:37:16

in Japan, in the Middle East, in the United States

2:37:19

Joined.

2:37:21

And look at the three things that I took from

2:37:25

that round off the conversation. The next one

2:37:29

with reference to the design of demands

2:37:31

Seismic events, the only thing that matters is the

2:37:34

lateral deformation. Look at the

2:37:37

The time we were talking about forces, it was the

2:37:40

first person to recognize that it was

2:37:43

most important. The next one,

2:37:47

choose between analysis and experimentation,

2:37:50

And that is precisely the

2:37:52

seismic instrumentation is similar to

2:37:55

choose between observing and thinking.

2:37:59

The next one. I love this one for

2:38:03

all my colleagues. Engineers do

2:38:05

calculations to feel good.

2:38:09

Design decisions are based

2:38:12

in criteria. If we don't have a criterion,

2:38:15

My teacher didn't allow it.

2:38:17

an analysis, one on the shaking table

2:38:20

model, but a pre-

2:38:24

early.

2:38:26

Hey, what are you going to get before? And I to him

2:38:29

I was asking my engineers what

2:38:31

sections will be given to me in this design.

2:38:35

And I was telling them, this column is going to be about

2:38:36

so much for so much for so much and the truth

2:38:40

It was off by plus or minus 5 cm.

2:38:44

Because? Because I had it and I already knew

2:38:46

when they gave me the numbers if they were there

2:38:48

were they good or bad? And with this, many

2:38:52

thank you.

2:39:03

that there is time for one or two questions or

2:39:06

No.

2:39:08

I'm asking because I've already gone too far.

2:39:10

one hour.

2:39:23

No, he even noticed. Excellent.

2:39:27

Hi how are things? Uh, I'm on the side of the

2:39:29

Casagrande University and had the

2:39:32

question about the construction of

2:39:34

concrete. If the concrete deforms

2:39:36

It lasts 30 years, is it true that within

2:39:39

seismic activity will react

2:39:40

Better due to the deformation?

2:39:43

Could that compromise the structure?

2:39:45

of the building and increase costs

2:39:47

maintenance? No, none. This is nothing

2:39:51

more to understand deformations

2:39:54

gravitational.

2:39:56

For a structure to truly have

2:39:59

damage from a deformation, would have to

2:40:02

It's almost like seeing the one that's falling.

2:40:05

In other words, the collapses that one can see

2:40:08

They do not affect. We have done thousands of

2:40:10

analysis to see a structure. One day the

2:40:13

The builder did it crookedly in one

2:40:16

school and we straightened it out with the facade.

2:40:19

We put up the facade and it wasn't noticeable, was it?

2:40:22

This and but we did the analysis what

2:40:25

It would happen in an earthquake, and the truth would be...

2:40:28

that it deforms a lot so that it gives

2:40:32

and no maintenance costs.

2:40:38

One more and that's it.

2:40:43

Fearless.

2:40:46

That.

2:40:49

They're going to learn here. That's the good thing.

2:40:59

Good morning.

2:41:01

Good morning. Justo was telling us that in

2:41:03

In China, most buildings are

2:41:06

They build with concrete, but equally

2:41:08

China is the number one country in this way

2:41:10

to be the most polluted mainly

2:41:12

due to the concrete construction.

2:41:14

Therefore, the low cost that it presents

2:41:15

concrete compensates for the pollution that

2:41:17

generates.

2:41:19

Yes, because mixtures are already being made.

2:41:21

As I was saying, the type of cement

2:41:24

Portland, which was highly

2:41:26

pollutant, it is already ceasing to

2:41:29

wear. They are compound cements, it is used

2:41:33

Silica is used a lot, smoke is used a lot

2:41:36

of the scum of industries.

2:41:40

So, all that revolution is

2:41:42

causing pollution

2:41:46

reductions of more than 80%,

2:41:50

That's where the industry is headed, isn't it?

2:41:52

If it's what you say, then it's entirely

2:41:56

The United States and China are the most

2:41:58

pollutants in the aspect of the

2:42:00

construction, but again there is this

2:42:04

trend of making these new

2:42:06

specifics.

2:42:07

Now, what we don't see, people don't see

2:42:10

that the metal structure when it is

2:42:13

the metal profile, because there is no more

2:42:15

pollution, right? You screw it in or you

2:42:18

There's a little welding involved, but oh well.

2:42:21

In the end it looks very clean, but the

2:42:23

the process of creating the profile is where

2:42:28

It pollutes a lot. So, that's why

2:42:32

We need to weigh things up. It's like a car

2:42:33

Electric, right? Electric car says,

2:42:35

"It doesn't pollute." Yes, but now let's see what

2:42:38

You do what you do with the batteries, right? So

2:42:41

We need to see the whole cycle, but

2:42:44

Yes, the idea is already being worked on.

2:42:46

that by 2030 it will be practically zero

2:42:50

emission. So how do we do it? I'm telling you,

2:42:53

with these new materials, because

2:42:55

The more cement, the more heat.

2:42:58

You have hydration and also more CO2

2:43:02

You ship, right? So, the new ones

2:43:05

Specifically, you see, if one had 100

2:43:08

of temperature, today you have 40.

2:43:14

There's been a big evolution in that, and that's why

2:43:17

We need to study concrete more, because

2:43:19

It's cheaper, there's no doubt about that.

2:43:22

We know it, and I'll bet anyone that

2:43:25

It's cheaper to do it in concrete.

2:43:27

Now, what we have to do is

2:43:30

those factors that are working against us

2:43:33

from the concrete, gradually eliminating them

2:43:36

bit.

2:43:39

The last one because I've already gone over by about 20

2:43:42

years,

2:43:44

But anyway, I hope it's for

2:43:46

good.

2:43:48

Good morning. Uh, we made a

2:43:50

study on comparing the structure

2:43:52

metal and concrete. Hey,

2:43:55

and the term used is the

2:43:57

embodied energy that is embedded in

2:44:00

the construction when it is built

2:44:02

material. So, contrary to

2:44:05

what we could think, the concrete of

2:44:07

This fact has a lower environmental impact

2:44:09

within these energy terms

2:44:11

incorporated, but of course, we did it with

2:44:14

the construction systems of or the

2:44:16

buildings that were planned here

2:44:17

in Cuenca, Ecuador. Clear.

2:44:19

Uh, and our tallest building was

2:44:23

17 floors. So, I was wondering which one

2:44:25

It is the amount of iron used

2:44:28

in these mega-buildings. Oh well,

2:44:31

replying to the colleague or to

2:44:34

student, well if the

2:44:37

concrete buildings are less

2:44:39

impactful in terms of energy

2:44:40

incorporated, but I wouldn't like to wear

2:44:43

the study beyond. Clear.

2:44:45

And I would like to know the amount.

2:44:47

that it's used more or less, right?

2:44:49

Clear. Interestingly, as I showed them that

2:44:52

building of 36

2:44:54

levels, this one that turned out to be cheaper

2:44:58

than one of 25 when we started

2:45:01

and it was about distributing the elements well.

2:45:04

structural. That's the key. If I

2:45:08

I do one

2:45:10

a structure that coexists with the

2:45:14

architecture, because that was the case

2:45:16

extreme of forgetting the architects and

2:45:18

Do it yourself, but if you can live with

2:45:21

with architecture, and I have done it

2:45:24

a lot with architects that someone me

2:45:26

he says, "How did you come up with Norman?"

2:45:29

Foster contradict him?" No, because I have

2:45:32

made. Because? Because I give them

2:45:34

arguments. That's why it's so important

2:45:37

teamwork, no longer the scheme

2:45:40

from where the architect begins and then,

2:45:43

Engineer, get your act together and solve this for me.

2:45:46

No, it doesn't work. Not working.

2:45:50

It's going to be an economic disaster, it's going to be

2:45:52

a disaster in terms of functionality,

2:45:55

etcetera, etcetera. We have to work

2:45:58

together and if we can work together and

2:46:00

Obviously, everyone has their own arguments.

2:46:03

solid, that's why I insist, if we understand

2:46:06

We can change the concepts a lot.

2:46:09

I once told an American company

2:46:11

I said, "Hey, why don't you do your

2:46:14

runner like that instead of doing it this way?"

2:46:19

And suddenly he sees me and says, "You have

2:46:22

reason,

2:46:23

I saved them about 30% on the aisle

2:46:27

and the structure came out about 25% more

2:46:31

economic."

2:46:32

And he said to me, "Yes, I hadn't noticed."

2:46:36

That's why it's so important.

2:46:38

planning. At the beginning is when

2:46:41

They achieve great things,

2:46:45

But if you try to do it at the end

2:46:48

You're not going to do it.

2:46:51

Well, thank you, I don't want to remove it anymore.

2:46:54

if left out.

2:47:07

We thank Roberto for his

2:47:09

intervention.

2:47:11

Next, we'll give the floor to José Daniel.

2:47:14

Terán,

2:47:16

Architect by profession, CEO and founder

2:47:19

from A1 Advanced Architecture, Master in

2:47:22

biodigital architecture by the

2:47:24

International University of Catalonia,

2:47:27

recognized for promoting an architecture

2:47:30

innovative. sustainable and high

2:47:33

impact. We welcomed you with a warm

2:47:35

Applause, please.

2:48:34

Not there.

2:49:01

And to return

2:49:06

Ah, I tell you, I'm back.

2:49:14

for

2:49:25

Good morning everyone. Thank you so much

2:49:28

to the Catholic University of Cuenca for

2:49:30

the invitation.

2:49:32

It is an honor and a pleasure for me to be able to

2:49:34

share your day, the day of

2:49:37

today with you.

2:49:41

I loved being able to be a part of the

2:49:44

listen to previous lectures

2:49:45

William and the engineer Stark, in

2:49:48

where I feel happy to be able to

2:49:53

uh feel that we are aligned in

2:49:55

some criteria that I would like to go

2:49:58

sharing with you throughout

2:50:00

the one from this talk. more than one

2:50:02

conference, uh I'd like to take advantage

2:50:05

This space with you so we can

2:50:08

uh, to talk, to analyze some criteria

2:50:12

uh in a conversational way. Uh this

2:50:15

The conference is going to be divided.

2:50:17

basically in three moments.

2:50:20

uh a more theoretical moment and and

2:50:27

technical. After a moment in which

2:50:30

I would like to be able to reflect

2:50:32

with you as students who are

2:50:35

ready to

2:50:38

to venture into the professional field of

2:50:39

architecture.

2:50:41

And then also a third moment in

2:50:44

I would like to explain to you how

2:50:46

all these concepts and theories that

2:50:48

Let's see in the first part, uh, on A1

2:50:51

We have already applied them in reality.

2:50:54

through different projects in

2:50:56

many years of different projects and

2:50:58

how these have yielded some results

2:51:01

specific.

2:51:04

Okay, I'll try to be as dynamic as possible.

2:51:06

possible so they don't get bored, since

2:51:09

I think they've been here for several hours.

2:51:11

seated.

2:51:13

In this first part, which is theoretical,

2:51:16

I'm going to allow myself to read a few things to

2:51:18

to be able to do it a little faster and not

2:51:20

to ramble too much.

2:51:28

I'd like to start this... this talk

2:51:31

posing to them

2:51:32

this question we have now. What is

2:51:35

a model? What is a generative model?

2:51:37

and what is the importance of incorporating

2:51:39

This system in architecture?

2:51:42

A generative model is a system that

2:51:45

Its main function is to understand

2:51:47

and capture patterns from a set of

2:51:50

data that already exists. Once learned

2:51:54

and once these patterns are processed, the model

2:51:56

can generate new data that they share

2:51:59

similar characteristics with the

2:52:01

original dataset, that is, it is

2:52:04

capable of evolving.

2:52:07

The methodology of the generative system

2:52:10

This is done through a process of

2:52:13

ID,

2:52:16

analysis, parameterization and evaluation.

2:52:20

How does this relate to the

2:52:21

architecture? And why am I talking to you about

2:52:23

This at an architecture conference?

2:52:27

mainly because of the architecture

2:52:30

It can be understood as a system

2:52:32

dynamic that constantly evolves to

2:52:35

starting from generative models.

2:52:38

The systematic approach generates results

2:52:41

efficient

2:52:45

and

2:52:46

uh, it may, it may evolve

2:52:49

constantly involved in different projects

2:52:51

in an optimized manner.

2:52:53

In other words, it has one advantage, and that is that it doesn't

2:52:56

gets stuck in subjectivities, whims or

2:53:00

Intuitive decisions like these have made us

2:53:02

we have become accustomed to believing that it should

2:53:05

occur in architecture.

2:53:16

Can you please return it?

2:53:20

There.

2:53:27

But if it moves in yours, it grows.

2:53:34

Well, no, it doesn't grow in the...

2:53:38

presentation, but basically what

2:53:40

What we should be looking at is like a

2:53:44

such as a numerical structure or a

2:53:47

structure through vectors begins

2:53:49

to grow and develop in a way that

2:53:52

in a systematic way.

2:53:57

I'll move this one on to the next one.

2:54:00

What we should have seen is how

2:54:04

this structure that looks like a

2:54:06

structure of nature really

2:54:09

Go back to the previous one for a second, please.

2:54:12

Previous real, the previous one there.

2:54:16

It's not really growth.

2:54:19

natural, because it is a natural growth,

2:54:21

but it is actually governed

2:54:23

specifically by a series of

2:54:26

variables and basic rules of

2:54:30

self-organization and replication. By

2:54:33

that?

2:54:34

Because it's important to understand that the

2:54:36

nature and architecture have been

2:54:38

linked for a very long time.

2:54:41

Based on the systematization of the

2:54:43

reality initiated by Alan Turing in

2:54:46

1936,

2:54:48

countless

2:54:49

research to understand

2:54:52

the evolutionary behaviors of the

2:54:54

nature.

2:54:55

Linden Meyer developed it in 1968

2:55:01

a generative system that replicates the

2:55:03

systematic growth of nature

2:55:06

through a series of basic rules

2:55:08

of self-organization and replication

2:55:10

sensitive to the effects of

2:55:12

around. In other words, what we're seeing in

2:55:15

the lower part of the of the of this

2:55:17

slide.

2:55:22

When

2:55:25

when the computational simulation

2:55:27

behaved

2:55:29

exactly the same way as the

2:55:31

growth of a real species, was

2:55:34

It is possible to understand that even the

2:55:35

nature is governed by systems

2:55:38

generative with the purpose of

2:55:40

adapt to the environment in a

2:55:42

efficient.

2:55:45

At that moment we realize that for

2:55:47

to understand nature as

2:55:48

It's impossible not to think of architects

2:55:52

Gaudí

2:55:53

from 1878 onwards

2:55:56

and in Fray Ooto from 1952.

2:56:00

Imagine that from that moment on, this

2:56:02

phrase that we see at the bottom of

2:56:04

The one on the slide has already been

2:56:07

current. It is necessary to understand the

2:56:10

physical, biological and technical processes

2:56:13

that give rise to objects.

2:56:16

It would be important to ask ourselves if

2:56:18

we as architects in this

2:56:20

moment, when almost 80 years have passed

2:56:23

From that point, if indeed

2:56:25

We are doing the reflective exercise

2:56:28

which raises this question.

2:56:34

I'm including this slide because I think it's appropriate.

2:56:37

which is important to understand that

2:56:39

The more we evolve as a species,

2:56:41

Our relationship with nature has

2:56:44

has been decreasing

2:56:46

progressive.

2:56:48

And the interesting thing about this,

2:56:53

there

2:56:55

It goes there. Yes, thank you. And the important thing

2:56:57

This would lead us to question what the

2:57:00

next step on this slide.

2:57:03

I would venture to think that I

2:57:06

I would venture to think that it is the death of

2:57:09

the two species,

2:57:11

because we have to understand that the

2:57:14

nature and humankind have been

2:57:17

bound and will remain bound in a

2:57:18

symbiotic and this cannot be broken.

2:57:26

Many architects have followed in their footsteps

2:57:28

by Gaudí and Frayoto and currently the

2:57:31

architecture has taken a turn in the

2:57:34

world

2:57:36

and we find ourselves at a moment in the

2:57:38

that the traditional methodology of

2:57:42

project development has become

2:57:43

obsolete and in contrast to that has

2:57:48

an architectural method was born

2:57:49

emergent,

2:57:51

an approach called botonap.

2:57:53

This

2:57:55

The aim of this approach is to be able to

2:57:57

analyze all the information,

2:58:00

obtain information, analyze all the

2:58:02

information, parameterize it,

2:58:07

parameterize it,

2:58:09

obtain emerging results

2:58:12

And once these results are available

2:58:15

They are, uh, have emerged, generating a

2:58:19

evaluation process and that process of

2:58:21

evaluation generates discards and

2:58:24

generates an objective behavior in

2:58:28

the one we can be sure of that

2:58:30

The decisions we are making are

2:58:32

supported and justified

2:58:34

quantitatively.

2:58:53

Up to this point, I've spoken to you about

2:58:56

little of the theoretical part of how the

2:58:58

Architecture has been changing and is

2:59:01

It is important to understand that the systems

2:59:05

uh the generative systems that we have

2:59:07

spoken in the first part can be

2:59:09

applied quietly in

2:59:10

architecture, both in the projects

2:59:13

as in business structures.

2:59:17

from architecture studios.

2:59:20

I would like to invite you to think about this

2:59:21

the moment you are culminating your

2:59:24

undergraduate degree. In a short time

2:59:27

They are going to start joining the world

2:59:31

professional and they are going to start

2:59:32

develop their projects.

2:59:35

have they started thinking about what the

2:59:36

the career path they are going to take, that they are going to

2:59:38

to continue, if there really are any

2:59:41

systematic business steps in the

2:59:43

that can be adapted or if they simply

2:59:46

We still think that

2:59:48

architecture

2:59:50

It only has two moments. The one is

2:59:52

go and learn for a couple of years in the

2:59:54

study of someone who already has more

2:59:55

experience and then become independent and

2:59:58

to become self-employed so we can start

3:00:01

to make mistakes alone because

3:00:03

the next 20 years.

3:00:07

And it is a moment for reflection because

3:00:08

We as architects rarely

3:00:11

we can question ourselves about what really

3:00:14

what we are doing in the world

3:00:15

business and normally our

3:00:18

speeches or conversations tend to

3:00:21

drift towards our thoughts,

3:00:22

towards our criteria eh

3:00:25

architectural. we talk about visions,

3:00:27

of any kind of ism, but few

3:00:30

Sometimes we start questioning ourselves about

3:00:32

if we as a guild are truly

3:00:34

doing something for the sustainability of

3:00:37

all of us as a team.

3:00:40

At this point it is important

3:00:43

to really consider a position on

3:00:45

the one about whether architecture is a

3:00:47

sole proprietorship or if it really is

3:00:50

a collaborative system.

3:00:53

other professions.

3:00:57

What a shame that this one didn't either.

3:01:00

It grew. Well, other professions

3:01:04

They have already understood it before and have

3:01:08

developed business structures

3:01:11

multidisciplinary where the

3:01:14

People can specialize and do

3:01:15

a professional career

3:01:18

doing specifically in what they are

3:01:20

good, what they like,

3:01:23

without having to

3:01:26

uh becoming efficient,

3:01:29

Uh, completely eliminating this idea of

3:01:31

that the architect is a jack-of-all-trades.

3:01:34

These diagrams, let me see, can you

3:01:37

Give him back a second?

3:01:40

These organizational diagrams, uh, that

3:01:43

what we are seeing at this moment is a

3:01:46

system is the actual application of a

3:01:49

generative system applying rules

3:01:51

bases of self-organization and replication,

3:01:54

just as species do

3:01:55

natural, but in an organization of

3:01:58

architecture. The study of

3:02:00

architecture works this way, in

3:02:03

where each of the of the

3:02:05

Work teams have objectives

3:02:08

of business growth where

3:02:10

They can be arranged vertically.

3:02:14

developing as they can go as

3:02:16

They can also change their

3:02:20

specific work sequentially

3:02:22

in different additional equipment and this

3:02:25

It allows us to have a system of

3:02:27

constant evolutionary growth and

3:02:30

dynamic.

3:02:31

This business structure is very rare

3:02:33

Architectural firms apply it. TO

3:02:34

I'm glad that at the conference that

3:02:37

We saw at the beginning of William, he speaks

3:02:39

that Etinar has already incorporated a

3:02:43

organizational system similar to what

3:02:45

we are seeing right now. And I think

3:02:47

which is timely and important that you

3:02:50

as the next generation of

3:02:51

Architects, start thinking

3:02:54

in a different way, understanding

3:02:56

that it is possible to create structures

3:02:58

systematic, sustainable business practices

3:03:01

and that allow us all to work in

3:03:03

team instead of feeling that the one

3:03:05

He's sitting next to you, he's going to be

3:03:07

their competition in the future. Start to

3:03:09

understand that it will rather be their

3:03:11

an ally that allows them all to grow

3:03:13

a sustainable and systematic way.

3:03:23

Everything, every system needs several

3:03:25

components and parameters that allow them

3:03:27

that allows us to activate the method

3:03:28

evaluation scientist. And the

3:03:32

architecture has the advantage that

3:03:34

Being a cycle allows us to work in

3:03:36

projects in a cross-cutting manner.

3:03:40

This has the advantage that

3:03:42

What we really have is that each one of the

3:03:44

of the components that make up a

3:03:47

draft of an architectural project

3:03:49

These are sequential work moments

3:03:54

that are linked one to the other, but

3:03:57

the advantage of working in a cycle of one

3:03:59

The project is that time is

3:04:01

relatively short and that in that time

3:04:03

we can reflect and

3:04:05

evaluation that allows us to go

3:04:08

providing feedback to the teams.

3:04:10

to the previous teams in order to

3:04:13

learn from everything that everyone

3:04:15

errors or all the the eh the

3:04:18

virtues that we have obtained in that

3:04:20

project to be able to apply them in the

3:04:22

following. In other words, even so, no

3:04:25

Let's understand the scientific method of

3:04:27

directly, anyway

3:04:29

architecture as such allows us or us

3:04:31

pigeonholes working in a certain way

3:04:34

constantly evolving through the

3:04:36

different projects. By

3:04:53

What can I show you? Some analyses

3:04:56

of performance KPI indicators?

3:05:00

Because at the moment when

3:05:02

Let's understand that the structure

3:05:03

business studies

3:05:05

architecture

3:05:07

It is completely dynamic and flexible,

3:05:09

We also need to understand that the

3:05:10

traditional method of working

3:05:13

sitting in an office for 8 hours, 40 hours

3:05:15

a week is also obsolete for a

3:05:18

process for an architectural process.

3:05:21

It is obsolete and does not allow us to grow.

3:05:25

When we started to take advantage of the

3:05:26

technology and we understand that

3:05:30

There are already applicable methods that allow us

3:05:32

allow

3:05:34

convert our structure

3:05:36

business in a dynamic system of

3:05:38

flexible growth, then let's go

3:05:41

to be able to take advantage of all these indicators

3:05:43

to be able to measure ourselves and

3:05:46

measuring our work team without the

3:05:48

need to have to be

3:05:49

pigeonholed into a traditional theme and

3:05:53

critical, like sitting down to warm the

3:05:54

if we've really finished

3:05:56

or to stay up all night unnecessarily when

3:05:59

we could organize systematically

3:06:01

our working system to be able to

3:06:04

to do things in a practical way,

3:06:06

efficient and correct. This has as

3:06:09

The objective is also to be able to determine

3:06:14

to be able to determine a specific measurement

3:06:16

of each of the team members

3:06:19

in a real and timely way

3:06:21

real and in a direct way.

3:06:24

As a result, we can grow so much

3:06:28

in responsibilities and positions, but

3:06:30

also financially, because in that

3:06:33

point uh the financial conditions are

3:06:36

they become completely flexible and

3:06:38

directly correlated with the

3:06:40

amount of work we are

3:06:41

doing,

3:06:43

in the amount of contribution we have

3:06:45

about each project and performance

3:06:48

specific to each project. So,

3:06:50

What we're doing again is

3:06:52

take advantage of the fact that architecture always

3:06:54

It was about science, taking it to a

3:06:57

business mechanism and being able to understand

3:06:59

how at that point can we convert something

3:07:02

which we've usually been told is

3:07:03

art in something scientific again that

3:07:06

we can test and measure

3:07:08

objectively.

3:07:15

With this I would like

3:07:17

how to conclude this second part in

3:07:19

where we can understand that the

3:07:21

architecture really did cease to be

3:07:24

a one-man career and became

3:07:27

in a collaborative race. And the

3:07:30

collaborative architecture has as

3:07:31

benefit that each person

3:07:34

of a team member have

3:07:36

a specific virtue, they have a

3:07:38

specific capacity

3:07:41

that makes them talented at what they

3:07:42

I like to do it. And not necessarily all of them.

3:07:45

All architects have to

3:07:46

We need to know everything and we have to be good.

3:07:48

throughout. All our team needs is to

3:07:50

work that is complementary and helps us

3:07:53

in the parts where we are not so

3:07:55

good for being able to globally all

3:07:58

to reach a common goal, to

3:08:00

common well-being and growth

3:08:01

global. When architects

3:08:04

We become specialists, we acquire

3:08:06

technical knowledge

3:08:08

and we are much more precise. we dominate

3:08:11

our field of action for a better

3:08:12

way and we allow all of us who

3:08:16

We are, those of us who are part of a

3:08:17

team, constantly evolve.

3:08:21

Before we finish this

3:08:23

slide, I would like us to

3:08:24

Let's focus a little bit on this graph of

3:08:27

the right.

3:08:29

It's super important to understand that uh to the

3:08:32

Over the course of 15 years we made a series of

3:08:35

measurements, obviously because my

3:08:38

situation of being linked to the

3:08:39

The academy allowed me to communicate with you

3:08:42

with different with different

3:08:45

architecture students who later

3:08:46

They became professionals and with a great

3:08:49

number of students and a

3:08:50

survey where we allow ourselves

3:08:52

to understand these conclusions that are

3:08:54

quite drastic and critical. If the

3:08:57

architecture continues to be understood as

3:08:59

a one-person profession, the result

3:09:01

This is going to be it. Of all the people who

3:09:04

We were able to interview 75% of those

3:09:08

New professionals are not working

3:09:11

in architecture.

3:09:13

Only 15% are working in

3:09:18

work related to architecture,

3:09:19

but it does not design or build directly

3:09:22

and barely 10%

3:09:25

design and build. So, what does he want?

3:09:27

say? If we still see each other

3:09:30

As a competition, we are

3:09:32

sadly condemned to stop

3:09:36

to do architecture and to find ourselves forced to

3:09:39

seeking our sustainability

3:09:41

financial. in some other field

3:09:44

the one we truly love and the one

3:09:47

We have dedicated so many years and so much to it

3:09:49

effort.

3:09:54

In this third part I would like

3:09:56

precisely to propose the most paradigm

3:09:57

serious for everyone, and it's important to understand if the

3:10:00

architecture should still be

3:10:03

understood or categorized as an object or

3:10:07

whether we should understand him as a

3:10:09

complex system of a series of layers and

3:10:11

a series of specific conditions.

3:10:15

It is up to you as students

3:10:16

determine where they want to stay,

3:10:18

But I can tell you, I'm not going to talk

3:10:20

much of the object because it is not what we

3:10:23

we have dedicated, but rather

3:10:25

I'm going to tell you a little bit about what's happening

3:10:27

when we began to understand him as a

3:10:29

system.

3:10:46

When in the experience we have

3:10:48

In A1, I could tell you that when

3:10:50

we begin to understand architecture

3:10:51

as a system, we began to have

3:10:55

some elements

3:10:58

in our professional practice that

3:11:01

They basically support the method of

3:11:03

application that I just explained to you and

3:11:05

Basically, we have managed

3:11:07

have more than 130 completed projects

3:11:10

with over 250,000 mos built, eh

3:11:14

more than 20 international awards

3:11:16

architecture, with more than 25 publications

3:11:20

international and perhaps the most

3:11:22

important, because these are simply

3:11:24

numbers and they are projects, but maybe it

3:11:25

More importantly, we have achieved

3:11:26

collaborate directly and indirectly

3:11:29

with the generation of more than 30,000

3:11:31

jobs. And this really does the

3:11:33

difference because we started to give each other

3:11:35

He says that as architects we can

3:11:37

to be leaders and we can contribute with a

3:11:39

a lot of families that really

3:11:41

They need to work and they can work

3:11:43

in an organized and dignified manner, starting from

3:11:46

collaborate on the projects that I know

3:11:48

Let's do it.

3:11:51

This is simply to help us understand.

3:11:53

that all the projects we carry out

3:11:55

We do base ours exactly on the

3:11:57

scientific method and as a final objective

3:12:00

What we have is the possibility of

3:12:02

evaluate them objectively. When

3:12:04

We evaluate them objectively,

3:12:07

the aesthetic conditions of whether we

3:12:08

They seem to be pretty or not, they go on to

3:12:10

background and we begin to understand the

3:12:13

value that they really have when those

3:12:15

The results actually generate an improvement.

3:12:18

in the people who inhabit each

3:12:20

one of our projects.

3:12:31

The method, the method of working and of

3:12:33

The research we conduct is the

3:12:35

The method is the approximation method

3:12:37

button.

3:12:39

It is a method that necessarily opposes

3:12:42

completely to the traditional view of

3:12:44

architecture in the Top methodology, in

3:12:47

where the architect already has an idea

3:12:48

subjective in his mind, he translates it to

3:12:50

paper, to the computer, to whatever and

3:12:53

After that, create a design.

3:12:54

arbitrary, authoritarian, arbitrary, in

3:12:57

the one that is basically what is

3:12:59

what's happening in their lives is what's going to happen

3:13:01

to put it on paper.

3:13:03

That results in, as

3:13:04

As a natural consequence, the user

3:13:07

It really has to adapt to those

3:13:09

conditions imposed by someone

3:13:12

further. But if we begin to understand the

3:13:14

architecture with the through the

3:13:16

bottom map methodology, which will

3:13:18

What happens next is the following. The architect

3:13:20

cease to have that leading role and

3:13:22

it starts to simply be a

3:13:24

catalyst, a catalyst of the kind that

3:13:26

These processes allow us to begin

3:13:28

to have objective results. So,

3:13:31

We will begin to have what we had already told you about.

3:13:32

That said, a lot of information that

3:13:34

we're going to start taking advantage of it and that

3:13:37

which we will call inputs. Then the

3:13:39

We're going to parameterize it through a

3:13:41

trial and error system. Let's go

3:13:42

have a lot of results and then

3:13:45

Those results will give us some...

3:13:47

They will produce emerging results that

3:13:49

We're going to evaluate them. Once the

3:13:51

We evaluate, we will be able to generate a

3:13:52

a discard system and we're going to get a

3:13:55

objective result that tells us that it is

3:13:57

the one with the best capabilities for

3:13:58

to be able to develop in reality.

3:14:03

AND

3:14:05

This advantage gives us the result

3:14:08

Finally, in this method we can

3:14:10

have a measurable goal and

3:14:11

quantifiable.

3:14:17

This would be, uh, this would be the process

3:14:20

specific that we developed for everyone

3:14:22

the projects and that it is important such

3:14:24

first understand it in a way that

3:14:26

conceptual so that we can later

3:14:28

to understand in an applied way.

3:14:31

So, we're going to have some information.

3:14:33

We're going to...

3:14:35

to specifically parameterize, making

3:14:36

physical analyses, performing analyses of

3:14:38

user dynamics, understanding

3:14:40

completely what we have to

3:14:42

design and how we are going to do it. Once

3:14:45

We do that and parameterize, let's go

3:14:46

to begin to see emerging results

3:14:48

and those results are simply a

3:14:51

logical answer to each of the

3:14:53

parameters we have set, but not

3:14:55

They are necessarily the best answer

3:14:57

because at that point it is necessary to

3:15:00

specific intervention of the architect

3:15:02

in order to carry out the process of

3:15:03

assessment. That evaluation process

3:15:06

It will allow us to make a selection

3:15:08

by elimination and that selection by

3:15:10

The discard will be the result in the

3:15:13

which will allow us to do architecture

3:15:14

detail and work in a process of

3:15:16

depuration.

3:15:20

Now let's take a quick look, I don't know if

3:15:22

It will be done automatically, but

3:15:24

Basically, in a graphic way, what they

3:15:26

I just explained. So, in the

3:15:28

input process we are going to start

3:15:30

to have information, different types of

3:15:32

information that we need to start

3:15:34

channel.

3:15:40

Physical information, information from

3:15:42

user dynamics, needs,

3:15:45

specific conditions

3:15:49

and we're going to parameterize them. Once

3:15:51

We parameterized them, we started to

3:15:53

obtain, as I was saying, a lot of

3:15:56

emerging results. Everyone responds to

3:16:00

the parameterization, but not all are the

3:16:02

best architectural response.

3:16:07

So, we need to start the process

3:16:09

evaluation where it really

3:16:11

It's important to start working

3:16:12

objective measurement matrices where

3:16:15

not where subjectivity becomes a

3:16:17

background and what we started to have

3:16:19

These are quantifiable results.

3:16:21

These quantifiable results will

3:16:24

to contemplate absolutely all the

3:16:28

the areas of concern that the

3:16:30

We architects should have, as for

3:16:32

sustainability is an example.

3:16:38

the technical aspects of the regulations,

3:16:43

how can we take advantage of a better

3:16:45

that regulation and really

3:16:47

to become efficient.

3:16:52

if we are doing projects

3:16:53

multi-family buildings, it's super important

3:16:56

always consider a commercial approach

3:16:58

in order to understand exactly what

3:17:00

We saw in the first conference how

3:17:02

These projects will financially

3:17:04

to be sustainable, because otherwise our

3:17:06

Promoter clients are not going to come back to us

3:17:08

to hire.

3:17:12

And once we put all those uhs that

3:17:15

We have devalued all those things.

3:17:18

different scenarios, then yes

3:17:21

we can say that one of those

3:17:25

that one of those results will be the

3:17:28

that best answers all of those questions.

3:17:31

those needs that we have assessed. AND

3:17:33

Once that happens, then we can

3:17:35

to begin the purification process, in

3:17:37

where architecture already has to

3:17:39

become a technical architecture of

3:17:40

detail, where each element is

3:17:43

designed in a technical way, where

3:17:45

It is understood in a technical way.

3:17:56

The goal of being able to work

3:17:58

The architecture, technically speaking, is that

3:18:00

We as architects cannot

3:18:02

to know if we will be present

3:18:05

in the complete project cycle or

3:18:08

if at some point we are going to have a

3:18:09

external builder or we're going to have

3:18:11

someone who uh

3:18:14

where we are going to have a project in

3:18:16

that where we physically won't

3:18:18

to be able to be.

3:18:20

From personal experience I can

3:18:21

to say that the application of that method

3:18:23

science has allowed us to generate

3:18:25

projects for other countries where there are no

3:18:27

we have been able to go and build them

3:18:28

directly, but that when the

3:18:31

The assigned contractor in that other country has

3:18:33

the project was developed and then

3:18:35

we conduct a contrast evaluation and

3:18:36

We see design versus reality

3:18:39

constructive,

3:18:40

we can say that we are at

3:18:42

99%.

3:18:44

The constructed project responds to the

3:18:47

99% of what it was designed for.

3:18:50

If they start thinking about the method

3:18:52

traditional here today,

3:18:54

being present, perhaps

3:18:56

being in the same city, many times

3:18:58

when the constructor is different from the

3:19:01

architect designer, the final result

3:19:03

The construction hardly resembles

3:19:06

nothing to what it was, how it was

3:19:07

originally designed.

3:19:10

And well, then in this final part,

3:19:13

that I would like to share with you

3:19:16

It's something that would be important.

3:19:20

to consider whether when we start a

3:19:21

project

3:19:23

architectural if we are facing a

3:19:25

free canvas as we have sometimes been

3:19:27

made us think, or if we really already have

3:19:29

a pre-existing natural context, a

3:19:31

ecosystem that already works in a

3:19:34

integrated and in a harmonious way. And the

3:19:37

architecture when it gets into that

3:19:38

ecosystem, if it even has one

3:19:40

that it's intrusive or if it is

3:19:42

that the correct thing to do is to start

3:19:44

correlate in a way

3:19:46

symbiotic.

3:19:48

These are real projects, these are photos

3:19:50

real projects already built that

3:19:51

we have done, where we feel that

3:19:53

really the integration with the

3:19:55

pre-existing nature is high and that has

3:19:58

conditions already generated for measurements

3:20:01

impact, for example, of areas of

3:20:03

user comfort and experience

3:20:06

much more comfortable than in

3:20:07

projects where nature has not

3:20:09

has been considered.

3:20:16

It is important to understand that if the

3:20:18

nature was there before, the

3:20:20

architecture is what should

3:20:21

to be flexible, not the other way around.

3:20:31

It is also important if

3:20:32

we began to consider the environment as

3:20:36

the predominant, pre-existing element,

3:20:38

Initial, then it is also important

3:20:40

understand the type of batch we are

3:20:42

we are facing and understanding how

3:20:44

That batch naturally has a certain

3:20:47

specific potential without the need for

3:20:49

generate a variation

3:20:51

eh very strong. I don't know if it happens here.

3:20:54

Cuenca, but I can explain and tell you

3:20:56

which in Quito, for example, is very common

3:20:58

that people buy projects with a

3:21:00

steep slope and that they build walls of

3:21:02

$100,000 containment

3:21:04

to be able to convert them into land

3:21:06

plans.

3:21:07

That doesn't make sense because besides

3:21:09

to be one of generating a waste of

3:21:12

unnecessary resources, the time in which

3:21:14

we changed in such a substantial way

3:21:16

the batch, then we forced the

3:21:19

customers to incur to incur a

3:21:21

a series of unnecessary risks

3:21:23

permanent. For example, what

3:21:25

We talked about what they told us

3:21:27

in the previous presentation that the one of

3:21:30

that there is a high seismic risk.

3:21:32

Imagine how it goes, how it goes

3:21:34

increase seismic risk in the

3:21:36

moment when we have a

3:21:37

fully filled lot. It's impossible.

3:21:40

to be able to simulate a behavior

3:21:43

real because we are not on the ground

3:21:44

firm. So, at the moment when

3:21:47

we begin to understand that architecture

3:21:48

and the topography and the natural environment

3:21:51

They must work together and

3:21:53

symbiotic, then the results

3:21:55

Architectural aspects are going to be much more

3:21:57

related and will be able to blend in

3:21:59

in a better way with that environment and

3:22:02

Obviously, financially they're going to be more

3:22:04

efficient.

3:22:20

As a result,

3:22:22

I would invite them to think that as

3:22:23

natural result, once it

3:22:26

apply this method in your

3:22:28

work dynamics, what's going on, what's going on

3:22:30

What's starting to happen is that those results

3:22:33

measurable and quantifiable objectives,

3:22:36

They can be sent, evaluated, uh

3:22:39

can participate in a series of

3:22:40

international competitions where the

3:22:43

The real value of the project will be in

3:22:44

how those projects

3:22:47

They maintain and justify themselves in a way

3:22:49

objective.

3:22:51

And as I was saying, the important thing is that

3:22:52

It's going to start losing its value

3:22:55

so critical, the aspect the aspect

3:22:59

aesthetic and rather all aspects

3:23:01

Technicians are beginning to gain relevance

3:23:03

elderly. As a natural consequence of that,

3:23:06

What has happened to us is that

3:23:07

we have been able to win awards

3:23:08

international in different

3:23:10

continents and in many countries. AND

3:23:12

This gives it significant value.

3:23:14

Ecuador's architecture because it is

3:23:16

Made with Ecuadorian architects,

3:23:18

Ecuadorian projects in our country

3:23:21

which have usually led us to think that

3:23:23

It lacks competitiveness

3:23:24

international and it's really a lie.

3:23:27

The simple thing is that we don't

3:23:29

we have started to reflect on where

3:23:31

We should evolve as a profession.

3:23:40

Well, not all of them appeared here, but

3:23:43

basically to wrap up what they

3:23:45

I wanted to show that we have done

3:23:47

a series of projects where

3:23:48

They can tell that there is an element

3:23:49

common, and that is that nature always

3:23:52

is present, it is always the

3:23:54

protagonist and this allows us

3:23:57

Obviously, it will improve, as I was saying,

3:23:59

comfort zones inside

3:24:01

all the spaces and generate for the

3:24:04

users a much more way of living

3:24:06

friendly and different, taking advantage of a

3:24:09

natural resource that is being lost to us

3:24:10

ending. If we, as a guild,

3:24:13

As architects, we didn't start taking care

3:24:15

the planet, it's impossible to think that this

3:24:17

It will survive for a long time longer.

3:24:22

That. Thank you so much.

3:24:34

I don't know if there are any questions or...

3:24:37

or not.

3:24:52

Sorry. Good afternoon. And as a question,

3:24:56

one of the important points of the

3:24:59

The topic he's talking about is...

3:25:03

focus architecture towards not

3:25:07

and invade the natural space, but

3:25:11

What would be the way or what would be

3:25:13

the most practical and functional methods

3:25:17

to apply this in project cases

3:25:20

big? Here in Cuenca we have the case

3:25:23

of

3:25:25

The Mol del Alto is the latest work and

3:25:28

had a medium planning problem

3:25:32

large in terms of the invasion that is

3:25:34

He made the natural space.

3:25:36

So, I don't know if there would be a better one.

3:25:39

method or a better technique of

3:25:42

implementation or planning so that

3:25:45

spaces of invasion should not be created

3:25:47

big. And in the case of the images

3:25:51

What he showed us at the end seems to be

3:25:54

single-family housing projects,

3:25:56

slightly smaller projects in the

3:25:58

which is a little easier to adapt to

3:26:01

nature. So, precisely

3:26:03

to know if there are larger scales, one

3:26:07

best way to implement these

3:26:10

tactics.

3:26:13

Yes, well, regarding the first part

3:26:14

From the question, I think that

3:26:17

It is not within my competence to criticize or

3:26:20

evaluate the Mol del Alto project,

3:26:22

Because obviously I don't know him

3:26:25

in detail, but what I would like

3:26:28

Telling them about that is...

3:26:30

obviously any project that is

3:26:32

implanted within a forest

3:26:34

protected and that causes an impact

3:26:37

such a large natural natural thing should be

3:26:39

questioned by all architects

3:26:41

local and should be evaluated by everyone

3:26:44

local architects, because

3:26:46

we, as I was saying in the

3:26:47

presentation, I think we have the

3:26:49

obligation to be the ones who take care of the

3:26:50

natural ecosystem because

3:26:54

We are necessarily the ones who do it

3:26:55

we invade with projects

3:26:57

architectural, those of us who modified it.

3:27:00

We are also in charge of taking the

3:27:03

decision whether we eliminate it or

3:27:06

we incorporate into our projects.

3:27:10

I think that's enough about the Alto mold.

3:27:12

They could each now take out their

3:27:14

conclusions.

3:27:16

Regarding the second part of the

3:27:19

I ask if I agree that the

3:27:22

projects that were that were

3:27:23

shown in the presentation are

3:27:24

smaller single-family projects.

3:27:26

There were a couple of multi-family buildings, but

3:27:28

Finally, they are also projects

3:27:30

worked in small batches. A

3:27:32

multifamily project or a project, a

3:27:34

extremely large equipment will

3:27:36

to have a much larger lot

3:27:37

also.

3:27:38

So, the complexity of how

3:27:40

I implement a project in a small batch

3:27:44

single-family home,

3:27:46

no, it's not technically no, it's not

3:27:50

linearly corresponding, but it is

3:27:52

the same challenge of implementing a

3:27:54

project for a very large facility

3:27:56

within a very large lot.

3:27:59

I think the important thing there is to be able to

3:28:00

conduct an initial preliminary analysis and

3:28:03

to be able to understand the entire ecosystem

3:28:05

natural, what parts can I save from

3:28:08

efficient way and what parts I can

3:28:11

integrate into the project and the parts that do not

3:28:13

can be saved from that ecosystem

3:28:15

Naturally, see how the project will go

3:28:17

I propose replacing them, because I believe that

3:28:20

The objective at this point is indeed to

3:28:22

that we can be aware that each

3:28:24

project that we carry out

3:28:27

has or generates levels

3:28:29

specific pollution and while

3:28:31

the closer or more aware we are of

3:28:34

to be able to take our projects towards

3:28:36

a neutral carbon footprint, then

3:28:38

We are sure that we are

3:28:39

contributing to the planet.

3:28:45

It's perhaps some other one

3:28:53

It's a question.

3:28:57

Good morning. It's a question

3:29:00

uh, a little provocative.

3:29:04

The scientific method is accused of

3:29:10

to really destroy nature.

3:29:14

This is the urban planning of the years

3:29:17

This planning positioned itself

3:29:20

territorial of modern thought,

3:29:23

we could say he had those those those

3:29:25

scope of systematizing, measuring, uh uh

3:29:30

to put it all into a kind of language

3:29:33

logical.

3:29:35

And from anthropology, for example, it is

3:29:38

He criticizes the scientific method a lot for

3:29:41

of being the one to blame for seeing it a certain way

3:29:44

explicit

3:29:46

the territory, nature, it

3:29:49

It's only being used as a resource, right?

3:29:53

And this one really catches my attention.

3:29:55

insistence on these, on these, on this

3:29:58

conference that you kindly have

3:30:00

raised. My question is

3:30:03

This, despite the evidence,

3:30:08

we ourselves do not have a side

3:30:10

rational, an irrational side,

3:30:13

This, this Dutch architect Rim

3:30:15

Kulas, he makes the port wine and makes

3:30:18

the Seattle library and he himself

3:30:20

acknowledges. This building

3:30:23

The house of the opposto is very logical, very

3:30:27

scientist, but the library of

3:30:29

Seattle is completely irrational,

3:30:32

But curiously, the two projects

3:30:35

They seem. He himself acknowledges this.

3:30:39

this balance between the rational and the

3:30:41

irrational. And my provocative question is,

3:30:44

Do you think this method is the way to do it?

3:30:46

scientific only to measure, capture,

3:30:49

controlling everything can be an alternative

3:30:52

to continue thinking and

3:30:55

problematizing our territories and

3:30:58

urban design objects and

3:30:59

architectural?

3:31:03

I mean, I think it's a super question

3:31:05

important, perhaps warranting a debate

3:31:07

much deeper and much more in a

3:31:10

space that may have much more

3:31:12

time and hopefully more additions

3:31:16

actors. Hey,

3:31:19

Perhaps it would be interesting to consider a

3:31:22

a discussion specifically about that

3:31:24

with you and with and hopefully with many

3:31:27

students.

3:31:29

facing the final part of your question or

3:31:32

to the specific question of whether it really

3:31:37

the scientific method,

3:31:40

I don't know, it's like it moves away or it turns back

3:31:43

something much more mechanical. I think that uh

3:31:48

of the, I mean, I don't know if maybe not

3:31:51

I didn't specifically specify that.

3:31:53

The presentation, but uh, the time in the

3:31:57

that architecture is within the

3:31:59

method, that is, it is worked within the

3:32:02

scientific method, the role of

3:32:04

The architect is vital because he is the

3:32:06

responsible for being able to catalyze

3:32:08

absolutely

3:32:10

all those specific needs and

3:32:12

all that care for the environment, for

3:32:15

the user.

3:32:16

that the computer itself or

3:32:19

an objective method of objective measurement

3:32:22

It will most likely go unnoticed. That's why

3:32:25

It is never mentioned that this method of

3:32:27

work or approach

3:32:29

completely disassociate yourself from the architect,

3:32:31

Because then, what's the point of continuing?

3:32:34

creating new generations of

3:32:35

architects? we start to control and

3:32:38

a and a

3:32:42

I don't know, a a

3:32:45

to properly schedule a

3:32:46

computer and we have a substitute for the

3:32:48

architect. The role of the architect

3:32:50

It remains just as fundamental as in

3:32:54

the traditional method. Simply the

3:32:56

The architect's position is going to change and

3:32:59

changes in one way in one way

3:33:01

drastic because in the method

3:33:03

Traditionally, the architect is the one who

3:33:05

decides intuitively.

3:33:07

Yes, many times, and I think that

3:33:10

academia places a lot of emphasis on that.

3:33:12

that despite regardless of the

3:33:14

application method, the architects

3:33:17

We must be reflective and we must do

3:33:19

a lot of analysis and we need to talk and

3:33:22

to understand the implications of

3:33:25

that we are designing, but they continue

3:33:27

the results are subjective. If today

3:33:30

we take a walk around the

3:33:33

gallery of projects that have

3:33:34

From the front, we'll be able to see that inside

3:33:36

There are different batches of the same kind; there is one

3:33:39

different amount of appreciation

3:33:40

subjective of each of the

3:33:42

thoughts of the students of his

3:33:44

university and it's difficult to understand if it's

3:33:49

whether those projects are okay

3:33:53

Or they're wrong, because we're going to start them

3:33:56

to catalog them or are we going to start to

3:33:57

evaluate from our point of view.

3:33:59

It's subjective, but at the moment in the

3:34:02

that the architect's vision changes because

3:34:04

complete from that point, from that of that

3:34:06

top-down approach and we started to

3:34:08

to understand the importance of becoming

3:34:11

some catalysts, so let's go

3:34:13

can

3:34:15

to give greater importance to the things that

3:34:17

They are really important for the

3:34:20

specific moment in architecture

3:34:21

that we are developing. I think it's

3:34:25

It would be unfair to think that

3:34:27

architects of the past who did not

3:34:30

They faced one or they weren't so

3:34:33

aware of the impact on the environment

3:34:37

the environment we currently have and

3:34:38

about what and how we have polluted the world,

3:34:42

uh, they are set or parameterized as one of

3:34:45

its most relevant values ​​to

3:34:48

care of the natural environment. Without

3:34:50

However, many did.

3:34:53

But at this specific point where

3:34:55

We have already consumed a large amount

3:34:57

of the planet's resources and we realize

3:34:58

realizes that everyone as a civilization

3:35:01

We are collaborating to return for

3:35:03

to become sustainable and maintain

3:35:04

that living ecosystem for a longer period

3:35:07

of time. So, I think that's it.

3:35:11

that position of the architect as

3:35:13

catalyst at the moment it goes

3:35:14

deciding what those are

3:35:18

parameters that need to be given

3:35:19

more importance, then they go

3:35:22

conditioning the architecture of a

3:35:24

the way in which it tries to preserve a lot

3:35:26

more to nature, try to preserve

3:35:29

much more that ecosystem and become

3:35:31

mimetic with him.

3:35:33

I don't know if that answered your question at all.

3:35:35

but I think in a similar way

3:35:38

quite superficial.

3:35:41

Any other options, or are we already closed?

3:35:50

Well, then thank you all very much and

3:35:53

I hope you liked it and any

3:35:55

ask if they are, if not

3:35:56

They have me, they do more later.

3:36:10

We thank José Daniel for his

3:36:12

exposure. We also thank

3:36:15

Thank you all for your presence at this

3:36:17

Proyecta Cato 2026 event.

3:36:21

Before we conclude, we invite everyone

3:36:23

so that you can tour the

3:36:25

facilities of the Old Cathedral,

3:36:27

where all the

3:36:29

participating projects.

3:36:31

Once again, thank you very much for your

3:36:33

attendance. Have a great day!

3:36:35

late.

3:36:41

We are the Red Eagles and your triumph belongs to us.

3:36:46

all.

3:36:48

We are song, heart. Heart. Let's go

3:36:53

our mission to go far by

3:36:56

life.

3:37:01

We are heart and soul and nothing else

3:37:06

Our vision through work and effort

3:37:10

and passion.

3:37:13

Oh.

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.