Full Transcript

·YouTLDR

Learn the Language of Photography Through Critique | Eileen Rafferty

1:26:151,563 summary words · ~8 min readEnglishBy B&H Photo Video Pro AudioTranscribed Aug 19, 2026
Analyze another video with Pro30-day money-back guarantee
Summary

Effective photographic critique moves beyond personal taste to evaluate how deliberate technical and visual choices support a clear subject, evoke intended emotion, and communicate meaningful content.

Mastering the vocabulary of critique enables photographers to objectively diagnose why an image succeeds or fails, articulate artistic intent, and refine their work before public presentation.

Section summaries

0:00-6:30

Introduction & Critique Principles

watch

Eileen Rafferty introduces the objective of the lecture at B&H: developing a robust verbal vocabulary to critique photographs constructively. She highlights that while photography is visual, photographers live in a verbal world where they must write artist statements, discuss their work, and engage with critiques. She lays out core guidelines, emphasizing that critique is subjective but can be structured objectively by moving beyond binary 'like/dislike' reactions. Critiques must address the image directly in front of the viewer rather than hypothetical alternatives, taking into account any accompanying titles, captions, or statements of intent.

  • Articulating visual intent verbally is essential for proposals, statements, and portfolio reviews.
  • Critique must focus strictly on the presented image rather than what the reviewer would have shot.
  • Accompanying metadata, titles, and context significantly alter how an image is interpreted.

Establishes the foundational rules and ethical responsibilities of giving and receiving constructive critique.

6:30-17:20

Defining Subject & Establishing Hierarchy

watch

Rafferty breaks down the photograph into its core components: subject, form, and content. She introduces the concept of visual hierarchy using theatrical and athletic metaphors, where the subject acts as the lead actor or lead cyclist and all other frame elements serve as supporting cast. Through examples of her own failed shots—such as a dancer overwhelmed by a busy carnival mural and a backlit tree ruined by distracting window reflections—she illustrates how cluttered frames undermine communication. Photographers must explicitly pinpoint what drew them to a scene and eliminate or suppress competing elements.

  • The subject must dominate the frame as the unmistakable 'lead actor'.
  • Distracting visual elements must be eliminated in-camera, cropped, or minimized in post-production.
  • Self-critique requires honest discernment in filtering out images where the subject is obscured.

Crucial breakdown of visual hierarchy and practical methods for isolating the primary subject.

17:20-26:00

Controlling the Frame: Perspective & Processing

watch

This section covers practical methods to reinforce the subject using technical and post-processing tools. Rafferty analyzes a shot of prayer flags in Sedona, demonstrating how cropping to a square, aligning diagonals, and selectively desaturating alluring blue skies and red rocks redirect the eye to the flags. Additional case studies demonstrate depth-of-field control with cherry tomatoes, low camera perspective and framing around a dog's head, and deliberate cropping of a human figure to direct narrative tension onto a dress in a window.

  • Selective desaturation of naturally dominant colors (blues and greens) prevents background distraction.
  • Shooting at eye level with subjects creates emotional intimacy and removes awkward angles.
  • Excluding human faces shifts the visual focus from identity onto surrounding objects and conceptual themes.

Provides concrete before-and-after editing workflows demonstrating how to subordinate secondary elements.

26:00-39:00

Deconstructing Form: Visual Elements & Technical Choices

watch

Rafferty explores the formal building blocks of imagery: line, shape, texture, and color, alongside technical factors such as aperture, shutter speed, focus, and exposure. Using historical and contemporary work by Edward Weston, Elizabeth Stone, Uta Barth, Irving Penn, and Hiroshi Sugimoto, she explains how technical parameters dictate psychological impact. She contrasts Barth's committed soft-focus aesthetics with Penn's razor-sharp high-key portraits, and Sugimoto's long-exposure horizon symmetry with conventional composition rules, demonstrating that technical rules can be bent if done with total intentionality.

  • Line, shape, texture, and color represent the primary fallback vocabulary when critiquing abstract images.
  • Variations in exposure and color temperature drastically alter the emotional valence of identical scenes.
  • Artistic rule-breaking requires deliberate, exaggerated execution to avoid appearing as technical error.

Deep dive into formal visual elements and how master photographers manipulate technical parameters for creative impact.

39:00-47:40

Content, Symbolism, and Narrative Meaning

watch

The discussion transitions to content—the narrative, metaphor, and emotional resonance within an image. Rafferty showcases documentary photojournalism by Jürgen Schadeberg during Apartheid, symbolic winter self-portraits, Edward Steichen's veiled portraits, and festive environmental details. She explains that content can be immediately visceral or heavily layered with symbolism. She compares academic critique models (describe, analyze, interpret, evaluate) with her streamlined framework: What do you see? What do you feel? What do you think?

  • In photojournalism and documentary work, narrative content often supersedes formal composition.
  • Loaded symbols and metaphors evoke subjective reactions that vary widely across different audiences.
  • The simplified critique sequence—See (form), Feel (emotion), Think (meaning)—provides an accessible evaluation pipeline.

Bridges the gap between raw visual mechanics and deeper narrative interpretation.

47:40-56:20

Presentation, Incongruence, and Critique Ethics

watch

Rafferty examines the neglected dimension of physical presentation, including scale, framing, matting, and exhibition sequencing, warning that poor presentation can ruin an otherwise strong concept. She addresses the breakdown that occurs when viewer interpretation diverges entirely from artist intent, emphasizing that widespread audience confusion requires structural re-evaluation. She cautions against destructive critiques and toxic reviewers, recounting a student who nearly quit photography due to an overly harsh critique, and outlines the ethical duty of the reviewer to provide constructive guidance.

  • Physical presentation, scale, and framing choices must harmonize with the artwork's conceptual theme.
  • If a panel of viewers consistently misinterprets an image, the artist's visual communication has failed.
  • Constructive critique demands explaining *why* something fails and suggesting concrete paths for improvement.

Essential advice on critique etiquette, handling negative reviews, and presentation standards.

56:20-1:09:20

Interactive Critiques: Composite, Diptychs, and Black & White

optional

The audience participates in real-time critiques of diverse images. Rafferty displays an ambiguous composite self-portrait through a rainy window, gathering conflicting impressions (grief, hope, in-congruence) to illustrate how audience feedback reveals communicative clarity. She analyzes a sunny dog-and-tennis-ball image, showing why she cloned out a distracting background distraction. The section concludes with an exploration of diptych dynamics using paired river rock photos and an analysis of how monochrome conversion forces viewers to rely entirely on texture, line, and value rather than color.

  • Diptychs require analyzing both individual frame mechanics and the conceptual interplay between images.
  • Cloning out non-essential background artifacts preserves narrative focus and eliminates secondary eye paths.
  • Monochrome photography places the entire compositional weight onto tonal value, shape, and surface texture.

Provides valuable interactive critique demonstrations, though largely reinforces previously established frameworks.

1:09:20-1:18:00

Prominent Elements: Emotion, Over-Processing, and Text

watch

Rafferty analyzes images where a single element dominates the viewer's experience, rendering standard formal analysis secondary. Topics include intensely emotional portraits, overbearing post-processing techniques (heavy HDR, aggressive Photoshop filters), environmental narratives by Edward Burtynsky, and the profound impact of embedded text in Jim Goldberg's annotated documentary portraits. She emphasizes that when heavy techniques or text appear in an image, critics must directly interrogate why those choices were made and whether they enhance or obstruct the core concept.

  • When an image is overwhelmed by emotion or processing, critiques must address that dominant element first.
  • Heavy processing filters that do not serve the narrative obscure form, content, and subject.
  • Text and signage within a frame are read instantly and fundamentally redefine photographic context.

Details how to evaluate specialized photographic modes like text-in-image, extreme HDR, and hyper-emotional portraiture.

1:18:00-1:24:30

Abstract Imagery, Series Context, and Final Guidelines

watch

The lecture concludes with strategies for critiquing abstract photography (Harry Callahan, Aaron Siskind) where subject and meaning are intentionally obscured, leaving the critic to evaluate purely formal visual rhythms. Rafferty reviews technical diagnostic examples (missed focus, incorrect white balance) and demonstrates how series context (such as a father documenting his autistic child's perspective) completely alters critical interpretation. She closes with core recommendations: start with positive observations, stay strictly focused on the presented image, avoid projecting personal shooting habits, offer concrete suggestions, and end constructively.

  • Critiquing abstract images relies on analyzing line, tonal gesture, balance, and surface geometry.
  • Technical errors like mismatched white balance or missed focal planes must be identified and corrected objectively.
  • Effective critiques begin and end with positive reinforcement while keeping advice tightly focused on the artwork.

Synthesizes the entire lecture with specific advice on abstract art and a practical blueprint for conducting critiques.

Key points

  • The Tripartite Framework: Subject, Form, and Content — Every photograph can be deconstructed into its subject (the primary focus), form (visual and technical mechanics such as line, shape, texture, color, aperture, and shutter speed), and content (story, mood, and implied symbolism). When words fail in a critique, systematically addressing these three layers grounds the evaluation in objective observation.
  • Visual Hierarchy and Supporting the Lead Role — The primary subject must function as the lead actor in a theatrical production, while every secondary visual element within the frame must deliberately support and direct attention to that subject. Any compositional, lighting, or background element that fails to support or actively competes with the main subject must be eliminated in-camera or minimized in post-processing.
  • Intentionality Versus Technical Error — Unconventional technical choices—such as extreme motion blur, deep soft focus, or high-contrast Dutch angles—must be executed decisively and boldly to register as deliberate artistic statements. Subtle deviations or slight errors appear accidental, prompting viewers to diagnose them as technical mistakes rather than creative intent.
  • The Interpretive Triad: See, Feel, Think — Critique operates through three progressive stages: identifying what is physically seen (formal/technical elements), registering what is emotionally felt (mood, somatic reaction), and interpreting what is intellectually thought (concept, metaphor, narrative). A successful photograph maintains harmony between these three stages.
painters use paint dancers use their body writers use words we use light Eileen Rafferty
if you're going to do something do it intentionally Eileen Rafferty

AI-generated from the transcript. May contain errors.

0:02

[Music]

0:10

thanks for having me I love coming to b&

0:12

I mean David said let's make it worth my

0:14

trip but it's always worth my trip

0:16

because excuse me uh I love where I live

0:18

I live in Missoula Montana but I grew up

0:20

on the east coast and so most of my life

0:23

I've been visiting New York City and

0:25

obviously I loved coming to New York

0:26

City once a year and getting my dose of

0:28

the city and the art and the food and

0:30

the people so I love coming here and I

0:32

love teaching at B&H because it's always

0:35

a captive excited audience so and they

0:39

pretty much let me teach any topic that

0:41

I want to which is very exciting uh so

0:44

this lecture um is going to be about

0:47

learning the language of a photograph

0:49

through critique kind of a wordy title

0:51

there but the point is that um I've

0:54

taught a lot of courses in visual design

0:56

before and composition uh most of what

1:00

teach for the last 10 years um has been

1:04

always associated with the visual side

1:06

of Photography uh and I'm really

1:08

interested in the Creative Cycle and the

1:10

creative process and as I said earlier

1:13

and as David said I've also been a photo

1:15

history teacher and buff for a long time

1:18

so those are the topics that I like to

1:19

teach uh I think it's very important to

1:22

teach the technical aspects of

1:23

Photography but there's lots of other

1:25

people doing that I've done that before

1:28

um for me I I think there's a lot less

1:31

people talking about the visual aspects

1:33

of Photography and and the creative side

1:36

of Photography so that's kind of where

1:37

my passion lies so um my idea for this

1:41

class is to learn the language of the

1:43

photograph but also hopefully by the end

1:46

of this class you'll all have some

1:47

skills in critiquing photographs as well

1:50

or talking about photographs because

1:52

that is a skill it's not something that

1:54

comes naturally and I'm sure any of you

1:57

in this room who've been how many people

1:58

here have had their images IED before

2:01

okay right so you know that sometimes

2:05

critiques are effective and good and

2:08

sometimes not so much right you all know

2:10

that it's a skill so we're going to talk

2:13

about how to do that so uh let's get

2:16

started really we're learning the parts

2:19

of the photograph the language about

2:21

talking about photographs in order to

2:23

give feedback to other people about

2:26

their photographs but then also in order

2:27

to be able to talk about our own and so

2:30

you know I've been a teacher for a very

2:32

long time I've interacted with a lot of

2:34

students and there might be some of you

2:36

even sitting here in the room thinking

2:38

this right uh and I would agree that we

2:41

are visual people and that our images

2:44

it's important if our images can say a

2:46

lot but we also live in a world of

2:48

language we live in a world where we

2:51

talk to each other and there's going to

2:53

be some time in your life as a

2:56

photographer where you're going to

2:57

either have to talk about your own work

2:59

write WR about your own work write an

3:01

artist statement write a proposal uh or

3:03

someone goes what kind of Photography do

3:05

you do or why do you do photography

3:07

right so I agree that we are visual

3:10

people and our images being strong and

3:12

speaking for themselves is a great thing

3:14

but I also think that we need to

3:17

understand how to talk about photographs

3:18

as well so some initial thoughts about

3:22

critiques uh that I think are kind of

3:24

important to just set the the guidelines

3:26

here is first of all they are subjective

3:29

right

3:30

um they come from each of our own

3:32

history and perspective and opinions and

3:35

whether you are the person giving the

3:37

feedback or getting the feedback It's

3:39

always important to remember this right

3:41

but we're going to talk about in the

3:42

lecture how to make it a little more

3:46

objective how to make it constructive

3:49

feedback right because I think that's a

3:51

really important thing I think when

3:53

you're talking about um photographs to

3:55

other people and giving feedback it's

3:58

really important to go beyond whether

4:00

you like or dislike the image uh you're

4:02

always going to have that immediate

4:04

reaction of liking or disliking an image

4:07

um but imagine as a teacher who's been

4:08

teaching for over 15 years with

4:11

thousands and thousands of students you

4:13

can't imagine that I would like every

4:14

single image that I've critiqued in my

4:16

life right but it's my job to help that

4:20

person to give them constructive

4:22

feedback and to help guide them into why

4:24

I personally think perhaps that the

4:26

image could be better why or how Okay so

4:30

it has to go beyond whether we just like

4:31

or dislike the image uh it's important

4:34

and I see this a lot it's important to

4:36

address the photograph that's in front

4:38

of us right how often have you been in a

4:41

situation where someone critiquing

4:43

images starts going off into some other

4:46

photograph what it should have been

4:47

could have been might have been or what

4:49

they would have done with a photograph

4:51

right I mean maybe there's a time in

4:54

place for that but it's really important

4:55

to just talk about the photograph that's

4:57

right in front of you that's the image

4:59

we're talking

5:00

about is there any other information

5:02

that can help meaning are there is there

5:05

a title to the image right is there an

5:07

artist statement or a statement of

5:09

intent that goes with it is there a

5:10

caption because we all know when there's

5:12

captions or titles it can really change

5:15

the context of the image so when we're

5:18

critiquing images it's important to know

5:20

if there's any other elements that go

5:22

along with it that can help tell the

5:24

story and then that really gets back to

5:28

do we can we get to the intention of the

5:31

photograph now we can't always do this

5:33

the only way perhaps that we can know

5:36

what the intention was from the

5:37

photographer is if the photographer is

5:39

there and we can talk to them which is a

5:41

great thing or if there is something

5:43

written about it like a statement or if

5:45

you go in a gallery and there's

5:46

something written so you can get some

5:48

context and we'll look at some examples

5:50

during the lecture of how the context of

5:52

an image can change the way we might

5:54

look at an

5:56

image okay so let's start by talking

5:58

about the parts of of a photograph so

6:01

we're going to kind of I like to break

6:02

things down as simply as possible so I

6:05

think that there's three sort of main

6:07

elements to a photograph it's the

6:09

subject the form and the content so

6:12

let's break each of these apart the

6:13

subject is simply as you can imagine

6:16

what is the main subject of the

6:17

photograph what is it a picture

6:20

of the form is all the visual elements

6:23

of the

6:25

photograph okay anything visual we're

6:28

going to break all these down even

6:30

more and then the content would be the

6:33

story the symbolism the idea the

6:37

meaning if there is any of that and if

6:40

we can know what any of that

6:43

is so these are really the main parts

6:46

and I think when you're learning to

6:48

critique images or talk about images I

6:50

like I said I like to break it down so

6:53

if you can it's going to happen at some

6:55

point where an image is going to come up

6:56

and you're going to want to talk about

6:57

it and you're going to go you're you're

6:59

speech

7:00

and speechless can happen because it's

7:02

so wonderful or it can happen because

7:04

it's not so wonderful right so you kind

7:07

of have to have these things to fall

7:08

back on you can always start to talk

7:10

about the subject and the form okay so

7:14

as an example this is a photograph of

7:16

mine from the Outer Banks of North

7:17

Carolina one of my favorite

7:19

places we could say the subject is a

7:23

house on a sand

7:25

dune we could also say the subject is a

7:28

house at the beach or at the ocean if

7:30

you could see that it's at the beach or

7:32

the ocean the form would be it's a blue

7:37

house uh it's a pretty desaturated

7:42

image uh it's using a pretty good A

7:46

pretty broad depth of

7:48

field um it's using negative space and

7:51

composition right because the house is

7:53

tucked down in the corner and there's

7:55

lots of negative space so already I've

7:57

talked about some technical aspects like

8:00

the aperture uh we've talked about the

8:02

color of the house we've talked about

8:05

the saturation we've talked about the

8:08

composition okay so those are all formal

8:10

aspects um we could also say it's sort

8:13

of monochromatic right it doesn't have a

8:15

lot of variety and colors in it okay and

8:19

then the

8:20

meaning may or may not be evident um but

8:24

maybe I give you some backstory and you

8:28

understand or maybe it's called

8:29

grandfather's

8:31

Cottage okay or some title that gives

8:34

you some sense that this is a beach

8:36

house that's been in the family a long

8:38

time this was my grandfather's this is

8:40

where we spent holidays I'm making all

8:42

this up not really I wish I wish I had a

8:45

house at the Outer Banks uh but meaning

8:47

so it could be the story around it if

8:50

you're if you have that information okay

8:53

so this is just an example of subject

8:55

form content

8:58

okay

9:00

okay so let's start with talking about

9:02

the subject a little more so is the

9:04

subject

9:05

clear uh is it obscured right because

9:08

the subject isn't always apparent we're

9:11

going to look at some examples when we

9:12

think of abstract images then sometimes

9:15

we don't know what the subject is it's

9:17

not identifiable okay and we'll talk

9:20

about how to talk about subject um

9:22

abstract images but this is something

9:24

that I've been saying for a really long

9:26

time that when I'm teaching visual

9:28

design or when I'm teaching any students

9:30

about the visual side of photography I

9:33

think it's really important to create

9:36

hierarchy in your image and if you've

9:37

watched any of my visual design or

9:39

composition videos or taken any of my

9:41

classes um I talk about this a lot okay

9:44

so imagine when you go to a play there's

9:48

never any doubt of who the leading actor

9:52

is right it's not like who's the star of

9:55

the show okay so there's the star the

9:58

leading role and then there's all The

10:00

Supporting Cast and The Supporting Cast

10:03

is there to support the actor okay or

10:07

think of the Tor to France the lead

10:08

rider in the pelaton right the other

10:12

Riders on the team do not try to win the

10:15

Races they support the lead rider in the

10:18

bicycling race so that he will win the

10:20

race most often okay I think a

10:23

photograph should be the same way your

10:25

subject should be the leading role and

10:28

everything that's included in the frame

10:30

should be supporting the leading role if

10:34

the leading role if the subject is not

10:36

the leading role well something has gone

10:38

a miss right if if the viewer doesn't

10:41

know what the subject is and I don't

10:42

mean an abstract image that's a little

10:44

different we'll talk about that but I

10:46

mean if you come to an image and you

10:48

don't immediately know what the subject

10:50

is it can leave confusion or the viewer

10:54

is suddenly not invited into the image

10:56

because it's like I don't even know what

10:58

this is about

10:59

or there's so much in the frame that I

11:02

don't know what was most important I

11:04

don't know what the photographer wanted

11:05

me to look at so it's really important

11:08

as the photographer to identify what is

11:11

your subject and that sounds simple but

11:14

ask yourself how many times when you're

11:16

actually shooting are you asking

11:18

yourself that question what is my

11:19

subject and when you answer that

11:21

question it's important to get specific

11:23

okay meaning it's not just well it's

11:25

that

11:26

landscape right it's more specific spe

11:29

maybe it's the light falling on the

11:31

leaves on that tree in that landscape

11:35

okay so if you can get specific with

11:36

what why are you making this picture

11:39

what Drew you to make this picture then

11:41

you can begin to make decisions whether

11:43

that's technical or visual to highlight

11:46

what the subject is okay so everything

11:48

in the frame I believe should support

11:50

the subject and if there's anything in

11:52

the frame that doesn't support the

11:53

subject or detracts from the subject it

11:56

either needs to be removed or

11:58

minimized by technical Choice by

12:01

composition perspective or sometimes

12:03

post-processing right so the subject

12:06

generally is the leading star the lead

12:09

actor okay so when we're critiquing work

12:13

it's important I think to be able to

12:15

identify the subject most often I also

12:18

want to say as a little caveat there's

12:19

no hard fast rules um in photography I'm

12:23

a big fan of um I think there's a lot of

12:26

gray area in photography meaning you

12:29

will probably I won't often say you

12:32

should always or you should never do

12:34

this or that okay so that's why I'm

12:36

saying things like

12:38

generally uh are there elements in the

12:40

scene that are detracting from the

12:41

subject okay if there are it's important

12:43

to identify them talk about them and

12:46

talk about how to remove them improve

12:49

them so I'll use images in my lecture

12:52

just so you know um any of my lectures I

12:54

use images of mine I use a lot of images

12:56

from photo history because I think

12:58

there's so many f fantastic ones I use

13:00

images from contemporary photographers

13:02

colleagues so I will always try most

13:05

often to say who the photographer is but

13:07

if not you can certainly ask me uh this

13:09

is Harry Callahan and we'll talk about

13:12

him in the creative Muse class this is

13:13

his wife Elanor so here's an example of

13:16

the subject being very clear right

13:19

there's no question the subject is the

13:21

woman she's staring at the camera she's

13:23

sharp she's large in the frame right and

13:26

the background is out of focus it's in

13:29

the background so I don't think there

13:30

was anything distracting from

13:33

her okay I'm going to show I'm being

13:35

very brave in this lecture and I'm

13:36

showing a lot of my images that didn't

13:38

work it's really fun as a teacher to be

13:40

able to show all your best images but I

13:42

need to use images as examples and I

13:44

didn't want to use my students images of

13:47

what's not working and embarrass them

13:49

publicly so I'll use my own so this is

13:52

uh this is like the Montana State Fair

13:54

really fun you know Festival in the

13:56

summer and I saw this is a giant wall

14:00

with this wall mural on it I thought it

14:01

was really funny and I asked my friend

14:03

to get down below and dance and so I

14:05

took a bunch of pictures of her dancing

14:08

but I think that this is a situation

14:10

where the subject isn't it's not really

14:12

working I didn't really convey that okay

14:15

because I wanted the subject to be her

14:17

dancing and her sort of being goofy and

14:20

interacting in front of this mural um

14:22

but there's some choices that I made

14:25

that I think are

14:28

not communicating that one she's very

14:31

small in the frame two she's

14:35

blurred three she's wearing muted

14:39

clothing right and then her and then the

14:42

mural behind her is everything that

14:44

she's not it's big it's bold it's bright

14:47

it's sharp right so I think this is an

14:50

example where it had potential it was

14:53

kind of fun um but I don't think the

14:56

subject or my idea really came through

14:59

would you all probably agree with what I

15:00

said there I wanted this interaction of

15:02

her and the funny the funny scene of her

15:05

underneath these hilarious dancers so

15:07

yeah but I think we can always say why

15:09

didn't I do this why didn't I do that

15:11

right um we shoot fast we shoot quick we

15:14

shoot with our intuition and as you all

15:16

know I mean so many of our images don't

15:18

work right the key is in being

15:21

Discerning and when we decide which

15:23

images get through to the other side to

15:25

show right you have to be Discerning

15:28

there and say okay this one didn't work

15:30

so no one has seen this image well now

15:32

the world has apparently so um it

15:35

doesn't work yeah the world meaning

15:37

whoever's going to watch the video on

15:39

YouTube and everybody in the room here's

15:41

another picture that I don't think works

15:43

you guys are going to look at this

15:44

lecture and be like God she's an awful

15:46

photographer I have some of my good

15:48

stuff in here too um it takes courage to

15:51

show your images that don't work but so

15:53

okay so I'm using this as an example

15:56

because that idea of what was my sub

15:59

object okay I'm telling you what I was

16:00

drawn to was this beautiful light

16:03

falling on that tree the shape of the

16:06

tree and then the blown out highlights

16:08

it's like summer it says summer to me

16:10

right summer bright light um you can

16:12

tell I'm I think you can tell I'm

16:13

looking through a kitchen window so you

16:16

know I don't think this image worked

16:18

because I did not make what I was drawn

16:21

to very important in the frame there's a

16:24

lot of other things distracting from it

16:27

okay I think the window frame frame

16:29

itself I forgot that my pointer doesn't

16:31

really show up on the TV so the window

16:33

frame itself is distracting the light

16:36

above the window is distracting um

16:40

actually this reflection of what's

16:41

Happening inside the dress I'm wearing

16:43

or whatever is distracting okay so

16:47

again this image didn't work because I

16:50

did not remove all the elements of the

16:52

frame that we distracting now in

16:55

postprocessing if I really wanted to say

16:57

there's these images I would probably

17:00

crop in the top I would probably do some

17:02

processing I would try to minimize this

17:04

I would try to bring this out okay but

17:07

I've decided that this isn't an image

17:09

worth saving

17:12

okay and this is my funny slide of this

17:14

is how to be a landscape photographer in

17:16

Montana right make sure you include the

17:18

Big Sky make sure you include some wild

17:20

animals wild animals this is my friend

17:23

and I was just making fun of her like

17:24

really you're taking that picture Okay

17:27

so but it's very clear what subject is

17:29

it's the cow it's the Big Sky yeah

17:31

shooting through the barb wire okay my

17:35

unnamed friend that I won't say Okay so

17:37

the way that you can support the subject

17:40

or all the ways that we can communicate

17:43

what the subject is in our images and

17:45

when we're talking and critiquing about

17:47

images all the things we need to

17:48

consider is okay well the composition is

17:50

a big one right the way you compose that

17:53

frame will determine how important the

17:55

subject is okay our technical decisions

17:59

right our aperture our depth of field

18:02

our shutter speed our lens Choice our

18:05

focal length right all those choices

18:09

when we're shooting in the field will

18:11

determine if the subject is the lead

18:14

actor or

18:15

not and again things that we need to

18:17

focus on when we're talking about

18:19

photographs perspective okay again lens

18:22

Choice are using a wide angle and

18:23

putting the subject large in frame are

18:26

you using a shallow depth of field and a

18:28

long lens where is the photographer

18:30

standing okay if you're shooting a

18:32

little dandelion are you getting down on

18:33

the ground close to the dandelion okay

18:37

uh so your position where the

18:39

photographer stands will also determine

18:41

the importance of the subject in the

18:42

frame and then of course postprocessing

18:45

is a big one right there's a lot we can

18:47

do in post-processing now does that mean

18:49

we spend all of our time in front of the

18:52

computer trying to save bad images

18:54

please no please um however I do think

18:58

post processing is a very important part

19:00

of what we do and I know that everybody

19:02

lies on a spectrum of how much

19:04

processing they like to do and everybody

19:06

would like to say that anel Adams would

19:08

not you know use Photoshop which is so

19:11

false he would be a Photoshop Master

19:13

okay he would be manipulating his images

19:15

highly in Photoshop because that's what

19:17

he did in the dark room right so um

19:20

postprocessing in post-processing

19:22

there's ways that we can support the

19:25

subject by minimizing other elements

19:28

okay whether that's cropping an element

19:30

out or darkening something and

19:32

lightening the subject okay desaturating

19:35

things there's lots of ways we can do

19:37

that we'll look at some examples

19:39

later so let's look at an example of an

19:41

image that I feel that as I took it

19:44

didn't really work but this is what I

19:46

ended up with that I think is a much

19:48

better image okay so this is in Sedona

19:51

so let me kind of walk you through how

19:53

this happened you know I saw the scene I

19:56

took quite a few shots I mean not not a

19:58

ton I'm I'm not a rapid fire shooter I

20:00

grew up in the days of film medium

20:02

format uh so you know yeah 20 30 images

20:06

is a lot um I don't take

20:09

hundreds uh so you know this image I

20:12

probably took 20 shots of in different

20:14

ways and you know I was drawn to the

20:16

prayer Flags against the blue sky but I

20:19

also wanted the inclusion of the Rocks

20:21

because it it gives a sense of place

20:23

it's Sedona and they're so known for

20:25

those rocks and so I wanted those

20:26

included so I think that here would you

20:31

agree that maybe there's a little

20:33

confusion as to what I was wanting to

20:35

bring your eye to I mean the scene in

20:37

general but the Rocks important the blue

20:39

skies the Loring the flags okay so this

20:42

is what I did in

20:45

processing so I cropped it to

20:48

square I straightened The Horizon a

20:51

little more and I did that not

20:53

necessarily to like straighten the

20:55

Horizon but I did that to create more of

20:58

this very strong diagonal between the

21:01

Rock and the prayer Flags so they're

21:02

sort of mimicking each other what else

21:05

did I do in

21:07

processing I desaturated the sky right

21:10

because blue skies as is green grass are

21:13

very alluring so if green grass or blue

21:16

skies aren't your main subject I often

21:18

will desaturate and minimize them okay

21:21

because unless you saw this image first

21:24

which you all did but if you came to

21:27

this image first you wouldn't know that

21:28

Sky looked like before I gave you this

21:30

example okay so you might be sitting

21:32

here going well I like the sky blue well

21:35

that's my job as a photographer to

21:36

decide what I want it to look like okay

21:38

I also brightened the flags a little bit

21:41

I saturated the flags just a touch I

21:45

also as you can see slightly desaturated

21:49

the Red Rocks

21:53

slightly um that's about all I did okay

21:57

but I think that this makes it a little

21:59

more clear in my eyes I think the flags

22:02

become most important and then the sky

22:05

and the Rocks feel like a setting for

22:07

the flags

22:10

okay so we make all sorts of choices

22:13

right here what technical tool did I use

22:17

here to draw your attention to the

22:19

subject right shallow depth of field

22:21

very shallow depth of field right what

22:24

else is drawing your eyes to the subject

22:26

color right so that that blue chair in

22:29

the background could have been

22:30

distracting I threw it out of focus I

22:33

actually desaturated it just

22:35

slightly uh and then you know there's

22:37

beautiful light on the cherry tomatoes

22:39

as well which we can always always

22:42

please always use light right

22:44

photographers we can forget sometimes

22:46

that it is our medium painters use paint

22:48

dancers use their body writers use words

22:51

we use

22:53

light I know my dog my dog uh so what

22:57

choices did I make here first of all is

23:00

there any question what the subject is

23:01

no no okay um what choices did I make

23:05

here to really highlight the subject and

23:08

not create any

23:10

question yeah that's one of the big ones

23:12

here I got down on his level right I'm

23:14

not shooting from above so you know

23:16

we're we're connecting on this level

23:18

with the dog right and then he's sort of

23:20

looking off and it sort of makes us

23:22

curious of like well he just also looks

23:24

like he's just basking in the sun on a

23:25

winter day right compositionally I was

23:30

very aware of where this you know not so

23:32

beautiful dead plant um was to his head

23:36

I sort of framed it around him because I

23:38

took a couple shots at first and then

23:40

saw that yeah you know protruding from

23:42

his ear and I was like yeah I don't like

23:44

that so I made sure it sort of kind of

23:46

just curved around his ear I placed him

23:48

off to the side slightly and then

23:50

there's a fun red ball which adds that

23:53

element of you know play but also draws

23:56

attention to him right

23:59

okay but the point is is the things that

24:01

we're notice there's also you know and

24:02

you we can't always do this but there's

24:04

catch light in the eyes right when we

24:06

shoot living Figures it's really good to

24:08

have catch light in the eyes because if

24:10

we don't then they their eyes look dead

24:12

right so and luckily he was looking

24:14

towards the light so you know I didn't I

24:16

wasn't like move to the left dog you

24:18

know um so but again there was nothing

24:22

really I I don't think in the frame that

24:24

is distracting from

24:26

him okay what about this um what were

24:29

some choices here this is another image

24:30

of

24:32

mine well I definitely wanted the dress

24:35

to be I mean there's there's a

24:36

connection between the dress and the

24:38

girl because they're the only two things

24:40

in the frame but by putting the girl off

24:43

the edge of the frame I sort of made her

24:46

secondary okay if I would have included

24:48

her face and head in the frame we

24:50

connect with human faces as soon as we

24:52

see them she would have been the

24:54

star like that so by eliminating her

24:57

face

24:59

uh I think it hopefully draws more

25:01

attention to the Dress notice I also

25:04

desaturated the rest of the scene and I

25:07

actually saturated the

25:09

dress okay I mean that red brick wall

25:11

was more red the red dress everything so

25:14

um and then I wanted there hopefully to

25:16

be this sort of back and forth

25:18

connection or question between the girl

25:21

and the dress the girl and the dress and

25:23

this is just a series it's actually

25:24

self-portrait it's a series of

25:26

photographs that I did on the idea of

25:27

play and getting older and youth um you

25:31

know hence the pigtail as well the

25:34

braid um notice also some compositional

25:37

choices um notice you know how the dress

25:40

is floating in that window frame not

25:42

being blocked by any of the window frame

25:45

okay

25:47

um also notice how I was pretty careful

25:50

to have the horizontal lines of the

25:52

bricks line up with horizontal edge of

25:54

my frame so there's not a lot of skewing

25:56

happening I have some very verticals and

25:59

horizontals

26:01

okay okay so we know we this that

26:04

photograph is broken down into subject

26:06

form and content okay we just talked a

26:08

lot about the subject so let's talk

26:10

about form I mean form is a big one when

26:13

we're critiquing and talking about

26:15

images because it's all the visual stuff

26:17

right so first we're going to talk about

26:19

the visual aspects of form and then

26:21

we're going to talk about the technical

26:23

aspects of form so the the basic

26:26

building blocks for all photographs is

26:29

line shaped texture and color those are

26:32

our formal elements of a

26:34

photograph line shape texture and color

26:38

so these are always things that you can

26:39

talk about if if you're at a loss for

26:41

words or if you're not uh that things

26:45

that we can identify in a photograph

26:47

when we're talking about it okay so this

26:51

photograph of line shape texture and for

26:53

and and color yeah I'd say color is a

26:56

probably pretty primary one here I'd say

26:58

color first and then shape and texture

27:00

feel kind of important as well yeah and

27:04

we have complimentary colors right

27:06

opposite each other on the color wheel

27:09

yellow and blue

27:14

right here's a historical photograph

27:16

this is Edward Weston um shape and

27:19

texture I would say I think the texture

27:21

is very important and shape for

27:25

sure I think the shapes are really

27:27

important here was at a hot springs I

27:29

saw my friend standing in front of this

27:31

these weird plastic things hanging

27:33

texture was a big one too because of the

27:35

way the light was coming through these

27:36

sort of plastic sheets hanging there was

27:39

pretty important to me too but her shape

27:42

and the repeating all the squares you

27:44

know sort of rectangles and then the

27:46

light coming through and raling texture

27:47

were pretty pretty big there was not a

27:49

lot of color in the

27:50

scene yep so shape and

27:55

texture this is in the sanan islands I

27:57

used to do shop there um I think I think

28:01

I can say cuz I'm the photographer uh

28:03

that the color drew me immediately that

28:04

was the first thing that I saw was these

28:06

Lush greens and then the the old trailer

28:09

was like kind of this rusted faded

28:10

orange greenish uh so that was the first

28:13

thing that Drew me and then of course

28:15

the textures of this Lush grass against

28:17

this old you know rotting metal hunk

28:21

just sitting there then when I composed

28:24

the scene I really paid attention to the

28:26

arrangement of the shapes that was

28:28

important

28:31

okay color is a big one right and we

28:34

have to when we talk about photographs

28:36

and I'm not going to get into color

28:38

theory here I do um actually B&H has one

28:41

of my visual design lectures up and I do

28:43

get into color theory but um color of

28:45

course as we know has a lot of impact on

28:47

the way we see images imagine if this

28:49

were blue or red or white how different

28:53

it would feel from the gold okay so

28:55

that's an important thing to talk about

28:57

when we talk about images is the the

28:59

that impact the emotional impact of

29:01

color okay but yeah I'd say color is a

29:04

big one here this is my friend Elizabeth

29:06

Stone's

29:08

image this is a photograph of mine as

29:11

well um I was really drawn to the a lot

29:13

of the repeating lines all those really

29:17

strong horizontal lines and the color is

29:20

something I added in postprocessing okay

29:23

you can imagine it wasn't this sort of

29:25

neon looking um and I did this mimic uh

29:29

cross processing in film when we used to

29:30

cross process film and you get those

29:32

funky colors um when you take film and

29:35

process it in the wrong chemicals uh so

29:38

I tweak to the colors in this one and

29:40

processing to kind of throw it out of

29:42

reality a little bit with the really

29:44

prominent Reds and greens and yellows

29:46

but I prefer to have a little bit of

29:48

mystery in images quite a bit um and

29:52

so for me this this was my friend and I

29:55

and we were you know dressed up and

29:57

photographing each other and um but it

30:00

was this the scene of the motel itself

30:02

that was so intriguing to me and I just

30:04

wanted some human element but I also

30:07

liked that it looked like she was

30:09

rushing she's got her bags she's blurred

30:12

she's sort of running out of the frame

30:14

or she's at the edge of the frame and I

30:15

think that creates tension well I know

30:17

that when someone's at the edge of the

30:18

frame it creates tension and also when I

30:21

think of motels No Vacancy I think of

30:24

travel movement and I kind of wanted to

30:26

add to that feeling of again movement

30:30

travel um you know her sort of looking

30:34

like she's rushing or you know not

30:36

relaxing in the

30:38

scene is it creating depth okay because

30:41

often and not in all of our photographs

30:43

but often um we want to create a

30:45

foreground mid-ground background if

30:48

that's what you want to do in your

30:49

images visually and I would agree that

30:51

this would feel like a very flat plane

30:54

um but she does add this other element

30:56

of depth to it the subject is a little

30:59

more conceptual it's not obvious and

31:01

that's true and and this would be

31:02

something where context is important

31:04

because this is one of a series of

31:06

photographs about this girl at this

31:09

hotel um so there's more of a story when

31:11

you see the other images and you're

31:13

absolutely right I had the idea and the

31:15

concept and then made the images based

31:18

on the idea yep but we don't always we

31:21

can't always see the series we can't

31:23

always know the concept

31:25

right so another image that I sort of

31:28

had the concept for it and was

31:30

photographing my friend in this old

31:32

abandoned building okay so I think it

31:36

was very much about the texture here for

31:38

me and just the scene in general you can

31:40

see elements that I included like the

31:42

unplugged

31:43

refrigerator you know the line of the

31:46

cord um the place looks kind of empty uh

31:50

you know she looks like she's got her

31:51

sort of cleaning clothes on with her

31:54

apron um so I then as you can imagine

31:58

processed it once again with this sort

32:01

of bluish greenish cast okay to sort of

32:05

add to that feeling of um you know I

32:08

don't know emptiness it was an empty

32:10

place and so imagine how different this

32:13

would feel if it was you know warm

32:15

golden light right so again I processed

32:18

it to change the mood of the

32:20

photograph and my point of this is if

32:23

you're critiquing images and the

32:25

processing is as obvious as this it

32:28

needs to be talked about right it's very

32:31

obvious that this isn't this how the

32:32

scene actually looked I think most of

32:34

you would know right that we is not how

32:36

we see the world in this sort of neon

32:38

crossprocessed color so that's something

32:41

when you're giving feedback on images

32:42

that would be important to address uh is

32:45

it working is it not working what kind

32:47

of mood is it creating so I think

32:49

processing is important to talk about

32:51

when it's obviously processed again

32:54

remember critiques are subjective yeah

32:56

so we're talking you know know the point

32:58

of this class is more to talk about what

33:00

we can talk about when we look at

33:01

photographs okay and then it's always

33:03

important to make a suggestion of why

33:06

you feel like something could be

33:08

different or changed okay so some other

33:11

formal aspects that we can talk

33:13

about are all the technical choices that

33:16

we use that change the visual look of

33:19

our image aperture shutter speed Focus

33:21

exposure all those things right those

33:23

Baseline things that we learned as new

33:25

photographers and we still use

33:27

constantly

33:30

right so for instance you know the

33:33

choice to use a very shallow depth of

33:35

field versus a large depth of

33:38

field the choice of shutter speed to use

33:41

with moving objects okay these are all

33:45

things that we can talk about when we

33:47

talk about

33:49

images again shutter speed

33:52

choices but then also look at the

33:54

difference in exposure in these this is

33:56

the same image just exposed very

33:58

differently this is my friend Elizabeth

34:00

Stone she's my teaching partner look how

34:02

different the image feels this one

34:04

versus the light one right the other one

34:06

has like this light Airy sense of

34:08

possibility and this one feels very for

34:10

boing to me look how much detail also is

34:13

seen in the birds here versus that one

34:16

okay so choice of exposure whether

34:18

that's in camera or in processing later

34:21

can really change the mood of the

34:24

photograph this is the Contemporary

34:26

photographer UDA bar

34:28

okay who specializes a lot in soft focus

34:33

images okay so she purposely I mean

34:36

meaning you this is where context

34:38

matters I mean if you were talking to

34:40

UDA bar and you were like it's out of

34:41

focus it should be sharp it would be

34:43

like quiet sit down um because this is

34:47

what she does right everything she makes

34:49

almost everything she makes is purposely

34:52

thrown out of focus it's also important

34:54

to know so so maybe you might say well I

34:56

didn't know that about UDA bar what you

34:58

know however I think when you look at

35:00

this image this is not a focus problem

35:04

you know what I mean and this is why you

35:05

know when I teach my students I say if

35:07

you're going to do something do it

35:09

intentionally you know like really do it

35:12

if if you just slightly throw it out a

35:13

focus it looks like a mistake it looks

35:15

like you didn't Focus your camera or

35:17

your lens didn't Focus your autofocus

35:19

didn't work so if you want to do soft

35:21

focus you have to really throw it out of

35:23

focus to make it look very intentional

35:26

and purposeful okay okay so I think you

35:29

could you know in other words if we were

35:31

talking about this image I don't think

35:32

we would say well your focus is totally

35:34

off no I think we would probably

35:37

understand the photographer did that on

35:38

purpose and then it would be very much

35:41

about the shapes and the color in the

35:45

frame and again it's not about if you

35:48

like it or don't like it okay when when

35:51

we need to talk about

35:52

images Irving Penn one of the great

35:55

greatest Studio photographers who ever

35:57

lived

35:58

right okay so a photographer like UDA

36:00

bar who chooses to use very soft focus

36:03

and then Irving pen look at the insane

36:05

detail in this image right I mean the

36:08

choices he made here the black and white

36:12

uh the really really beautiful detail

36:15

the choice though to have no detail or

36:18

light outside of her face you know that

36:21

that looks like a very purposeful choice

36:24

so again this is probably not a a an

36:26

image where we would say there's no

36:27

detail on your

36:29

blacks

36:31

right you know I think I think we can

36:33

tell I we maybe we didn't know it's IR

36:35

if we knew was iring pen we of course

36:36

know it's on purpose but you know this

36:38

is where we could talk about things like

36:41

the beautiful light um the texture

36:44

that's being revealed because it is in

36:46

black and white um and the Beautiful

36:49

excellent sharp Focus right and that

36:53

choice of not having any detail in the

36:56

hair just draws us in

36:58

to the

36:59

face

37:00

right yeah the beautiful

37:05

eyes so sugamoto my all-time favorite

37:09

photographer let me just go on record by

37:11

saying that sugamoto if you'd ever like

37:13

to meet me I'd love to meet you like

37:15

he's watching my b& lecture he studios

37:17

in Paris Tokyo and New York I don't

37:19

think he's I think he's busy doing

37:21

something else um but he's Japanese just

37:25

really interesting photographer and you

37:27

some of you might might know his work

37:28

he's in CHS in New York quite a bit and

37:30

this is a project that he did many years

37:31

ago called seascapes so he went around

37:34

the world and photograft um different

37:36

seas around the world and what's really

37:38

cool about that project is you know he

37:41

talks that he doesn't just go and snap

37:43

shots he will go and stay at the place

37:46

for months and just sort of live with it

37:50

um but my point of showing this here is

37:52

we're talking about you know um the

37:54

technical choices we make so here's an

37:56

example where uh he's allowed the ocean

37:59

to go really out of focus okay probably

38:02

using a very long exposure so that EB

38:05

and flow of the water is blurring that

38:07

Horizon here's another that he shot

38:10

where he chose to have a little more

38:12

detail from his choice of shutter

38:17

speed and then here's another one

38:20

whereas it's somewhere in between

38:24

okay this is also an example where

38:27

especially if you see three of his

38:29

images I think sugamoto probably knows

38:32

about the rule of not putting the

38:33

Horizon in the middle of the frame I

38:36

mean I think in other words I think

38:37

that's a creative choice he's making I

38:39

don't think we would say to sugamoto

38:41

here well I think if you brought it up

38:42

in the upper third or lower third you

38:45

create more visual interest I think he's

38:47

definitely um and he doesn't do this

38:49

with all of his seascapes but he's

38:51

creating this feeling of symmetry and

38:53

balance by doing that now if that

38:56

Horizon were off kilter that would be

38:59

something to address okay because if we

39:01

want a horizon off-kilter again we got

39:03

to throw it off-kilter if it's just

39:05

slightly off-kilter it looks like a

39:10

mistake okay so the last thing is

39:13

content and we're going to look at lots

39:15

of examples and then we're going to

39:16

critique images together so content

39:19

think this is the other part that we can

39:20

talk about and I left this one to last

39:22

for last because this can often be the

39:25

harder part of talking about photographs

39:27

right

39:28

what is the story what is the implied

39:32

meaning is there a symbol or metaphor

39:35

there may be there may not be but if

39:38

there's one that's obvious it's kind of

39:39

important to address we'll look at

39:42

examples is the meaning apparent or

39:45

hidden documentary photographs the story

39:48

is usually very prevalent right

39:53

photojournalism usually pretty

39:56

prevalent does it evoke a mood a memory

39:59

emotion and this is where it gets

40:01

subjective right every single one of us

40:03

in the room perhaps might get a

40:05

different mood or memory or emotion from

40:08

a

40:09

photograph or everyone in the room might

40:12

get the same one depending on how clear

40:14

that you know that communication is

40:17

right but these are all important things

40:19

to talk about when we talk about the

40:23

content okay I mean the story the

40:26

content of this photo graph is the first

40:28

thing that I think you probably see okay

40:31

and this is my point as well is subject

40:34

form content there's no order of what

40:37

you talk about first what's most

40:39

important it's basically what hits you

40:41

first and in this image you're not going

40:42

to probably start talking about all the

40:44

use of all the vertical lines first

40:46

right you're going to look at it and be

40:47

like wow what a catch what an

40:50

interesting story you know this is in

40:52

South Africa during a partti a partti

40:54

this is um Jurgen shadur is his name

40:58

he's a South African photographer um so

41:00

the story is the first thing that hits

41:02

you and I'm not saying that then you

41:04

wouldn't go and talk about the vertical

41:06

lines the use of these repetitive lines

41:09

okay but probably not the first thing

41:12

right the sense of tension here I mean

41:14

that the mood everything that's evoked

41:17

in this I think is is pretty

41:20

important those would be the first

41:21

things that I would talk

41:25

about so again

41:27

an image of mine um you know is the

41:32

meaning immediately obvious maybe maybe

41:36

not Resurrection Life

41:40

Seasons optimism Mother Nature I mean

41:44

you're hitting you're hitting them all I

41:46

mean this is deep in the winter this is

41:47

like March and winter in Montana we have

41:50

long Winters there and it so and also I

41:54

like the the um the mention of optimism

41:57

as well uh because it was I was you know

42:00

having a really just tough week tough

42:03

day and I was out and my friend drugged

42:05

me out for a photo shoot and I just

42:08

grabbed some props and I one of the

42:10

props I grabbed was this little Fern and

42:12

it was about Hope and optimism and

42:14

spring and what's coming and growth

42:17

growth in a desolate otherwise desolate

42:20

environment it's about all the things

42:21

you're talking about right so again um

42:24

you know this story might not be as

42:26

obvious as this story

42:28

but I think that that's where the

42:29

symbolism or meaning can have should

42:33

probably be important to talk about and

42:35

is different for everybody in the room

42:37

or not uh Edward siken great historical

42:41

photographer right so we're talking

42:43

about content right

42:46

um I mean I think texture is something

42:48

you would talk about probably

42:49

immediately when you saw this but what

42:52

other content or stories or symbols

42:54

comes up when you see this image facial

42:57

expression for sure would be important

42:59

to address emotion right and then

43:02

identifying what those emotions are like

43:04

what would you say she looks angry okay

43:08

demonic is a word okay so someone in

43:11

mourning there's a symbol that comes up

43:13

for someone else is the Black Veil and

43:15

what that symbolizes very mysterious I

43:17

would agree I mean when our faces are

43:19

covered or a face is covered in an image

43:23

I do think that it there's a removal

43:25

from us in the person even though she's

43:27

looking right at us and then again the

43:29

facial expression so all those things

43:31

would be really important to talk about

43:33

with this image if we were talking to

43:35

Edward he were in the

43:39

room surprise I love that

43:43

uncertainty holiday winter for sure

43:46

winter yep and I think it would be

43:48

important to talk about that that shot

43:50

of red in the otherwise black and white

43:52

landscape is pretty intentional sort of

43:55

Asian looking curiosity

43:58

isolation you guys are great you don't

44:00

even need this

44:01

class so yeah this is an image of mine

44:04

and it has to do with all those things

44:06

you were talking about a lot of them are

44:08

resonating um it was also for me that

44:10

idea of kind of hanging on it's actually

44:13

late fall you know and that that apple

44:16

is just I mean it's you could tell it's

44:18

rotted it's encased in ice and it's just

44:21

still hanging on and it's probably the

44:23

last one on the tree and you know it's

44:25

going down at some point um so yeah it

44:28

was that sort of you

44:30

know that that yeah surprise I like that

44:33

element did you say surprise was the

44:34

word I lik that word you know finding it

44:36

first of all but then that sort of like

44:39

I said that kind of hanging on the

44:41

inevitability of what that it was going

44:43

to drop and Winter's coming right not

44:46

everybody has to know that it's actually

44:48

an apple okay so an example where the

44:50

subject maybe isn't the most important

44:53

thing to talk about here but I think the

44:56

symbol the symbolism the metaphor is

44:58

something that maybe came forward more

45:00

or that you could talk

45:03

about uh can you tell what the subject

45:05

matter immediately of this image

45:09

is you know people said oh well the

45:11

banner or the lights but then someone

45:13

said it's a party right so the the

45:15

subject matter really is the event right

45:18

so yeah it is probably a celebration of

45:20

some sort would everybody agree that it

45:22

feels like a celebration of some sort

45:24

right now the the banner is in language

45:27

that we may or may not know um but can

45:30

we can we deduce I mean we've already

45:34

told that it's a

45:35

celebration welcome it says welcome yes

45:38

is it

45:41

welcoming okay so you know just an

45:43

example again of the feeling and emotion

45:46

and mood of it I hope that it's

45:49

welcoming to you I hope that the lights

45:53

and the sign and the open door and the

45:57

warmth of it would make you want to step

45:59

in no someone's going no and maybe not

46:02

everybody in the room it does again

46:04

that's why it's subjective and you might

46:06

ask well I mean this is a wedding I shot

46:08

but what you know back in the day why

46:10

did I not just step in and take the shot

46:12

well I'm sure I did that too because I'm

46:13

shooting a wedding so I shot a lot of

46:15

them but one I wanted the welcome sign

46:18

and two I wanted the rustic wood Doorway

46:22

to kind of give a sense of place of what

46:24

this place was

46:25

like okay so if we look at um if you

46:29

look at like academic um how-to

46:32

critiques okay often this is a sort of

46:36

list of what is on the academic how to

46:39

critique meaning it's important to

46:40

describe and this isn't just for

46:42

photography I looked at this up for like

46:43

anything okay so to describe to analyze

46:46

to interpret and then to

46:48

evaluate okay uh but again I like to

46:51

kind of break things down in a simpler

46:53

way so when I look at these I think

46:57

comes down to what do you

46:59

see what does it feel like and then what

47:03

do you think about

47:06

it okay it's kind of that subject form

47:10

content what do you see what do you feel

47:13

and what do you

47:19

think okay so when we talk about what we

47:21

see I mean this is pretty much what

47:23

we've talking about been talking about

47:25

for the last hour we need to talk about

47:28

sometimes the technical things we might

47:30

talk about the sharpness we might talk

47:32

about the exposure the white balance the

47:35

subject itself the depth of

47:38

field okay we might talk about these

47:41

because they're

47:43

off we might not talk about them at all

47:46

because maybe some of the images that

47:48

came up the concept or story was

47:51

so you know potent that you're not going

47:54

to be talking about the use of shallow

47:56

depth the field or the other thing is if

47:58

these are all good meaning they're not

48:01

mistakes then often we might not go

48:04

there and talk about them meaning we're

48:05

probably not going to bring up white

48:07

balance if white balance looks good but

48:09

we are going to talk about it if it

48:11

looks off right we're probably not going

48:13

to talk about exposure if the exposure

48:15

is

48:16

good okay and I don't mean notice I

48:19

don't say if it's right because there's

48:21

no right or wrong for exposure you can

48:24

choose to over underexpose that's your

48:26

creative choice

48:27

okay however if your highlights are

48:29

blown out and it's distracting from your

48:32

subject or it's problematic in the frame

48:34

then you might talk about that okay so

48:37

these are things we can talk about we

48:39

can also talk about the formal aspects

48:41

line shapes textures and colors if they

48:43

seem important or prominent in the

48:48

picture we can also talk about the

48:52

composition the perspective where the

48:54

photographer stood and the lens choice

48:57

and then what the gentleman in the back

48:59

pointed out is presentation when it gets

49:02

to that point if we're looking at not

49:03

just a digital file on a screen but a

49:06

print on a

49:08

wall presentation's really important I

49:11

would venture to say that photographers

49:13

we probably the ones who drop the ball

49:16

the most on presentation of any

49:18

collection of artists on the

49:19

planet uh meaning you know when dancers

49:22

go to their production they're not not

49:24

thinking about the costumes and when

49:27

painters hang their paintings they're

49:28

not thinking they're thinking about the

49:30

edges and at what level they're hung at

49:33

and the scale of their painting they're

49:35

considering that before they even start

49:37

the scale

49:38

right um so I think that we often and

49:43

especially more so in the digital age

49:44

where we don't print and present as much

49:47

so kudos to all of you who are doing

49:48

that and having portfolio views and

49:50

making prints and um you know

49:53

presentation's really important and it's

49:54

a very powerful tool

49:57

uh scale and installation and how things

50:00

are framed and shown are really

50:02

important that can help communicate an

50:03

idea or they can help kill an idea I've

50:06

seen many presentations of my students

50:09

work in their final where it was like I

50:11

mean luckily I would work with them

50:12

through so it was never a surprise at

50:14

the end but you know I've definitely

50:15

seen presentations where the

50:17

presentation harmed the overall message

50:21

idea or visual of the project itself it

50:25

wasn't in it wasn't in harmony with it

50:27

or it was choices were made because the

50:30

student just thought it was cool you

50:33

know and it didn't actually um it didn't

50:36

actually help communicate the idea or

50:38

sometimes the presentation can be

50:40

distracting you know if you're using

50:43

elements that aren't supporting the

50:46

subject what do you feel when you look

50:48

at the image okay the mood the emotion

50:52

is it evoking every other

50:54

senses um one of the assign ments that i

50:57

g would give my students um in the

50:59

visual studies program at Rocky Mount

51:01

school photography was the first

51:02

assignment I gave them because I kind of

51:04

wanted them to freak out a little bit um

51:06

and I would have them photograph a sense

51:09

other than

51:10

site and I would say I want to smell it

51:12

I want to taste it I want to feel it or

51:15

I want to hear

51:16

it okay so is there another sensory you

51:20

know sometimes when you look at an image

51:21

you can almost feel what it would feel

51:23

like or you could smell it imagine a

51:25

picture of you know popcorn ever

51:28

okay does it evoke a memory an

51:31

association is there a reaction that

51:35

happens those would be important to talk

51:39

about and then of course I'm kind of

51:41

summarizing what we've talked about in

51:42

the last hour just bringing it to the

51:44

seaf think what do you think is there a

51:47

story is there a message is the

51:49

photographer communicating

51:51

something is there an idea a metaphor a

51:54

symbol there may or may not be but if

51:57

there's a prevalent one then it's

51:58

important to talk

52:05

about so what I'm essentially saying is

52:09

is what you are seeing and feeling

52:11

helping to support an idea story or

52:14

message if these are in

52:17

congruent um then something's gone aide

52:21

okay and we've all been there before

52:22

whether it's our own images or someone

52:24

else's I mean it's happened a million

52:26

times with students where we have a

52:28

critique and there's all this feedback

52:31

and the students like well that's that's

52:33

to you guys are all off Bas that's

52:34

totally not what I meant by this

52:36

Photograph and that's where I would say

52:40

Okay critiques are subjective but if 20

52:43

people in the room are getting the same

52:45

message and that message is off base

52:49

then you got to listen to that right or

52:51

if 20 people say that choice of

52:54

presentation that choice of processing

52:56

that lens Choice whatever isn't

52:59

working versus one person saying that I

53:02

think then we have to kind of lesen

53:04

listen um so you know if what you're

53:07

seeing and feeling is

53:10

completely in left field from what the

53:12

photographer intended if the

53:14

photographer is there to talk to about

53:15

it then you need to start to do that you

53:19

know brainstorming and helping of okay

53:20

what went wrong here why are we all

53:22

feeling this when you wanted us to feel

53:25

this why did none of us get the metaphor

53:28

or symbol that you were going for what

53:30

what choices did you make that took us

53:33

off base or what choices can you make to

53:35

bring us closer to what you're trying to

53:37

communicate

53:40

okay this is why you know I think

53:42

critiquing is a very important skill and

53:46

I think that there's you take a lot of

53:48

responsibility in your hands when you

53:50

choose to critique someone else's work

53:53

and if you're not interested in giving

53:55

constructive criticism then don't do it

53:59

and your responsibility is to then guide

54:01

that person and help them understand

54:03

what you're getting from the image and

54:05

help them perhaps move to a better place

54:08

with it and I say this because not

54:10

everybody is meant to critique and not

54:12

not all people are good at critique and

54:14

I've definitely I've certainly been in

54:16

the situation I got a master of Fine

54:18

Arts in grad school trust me I've been

54:20

there right anybody's been in art grad

54:22

school you've had the critique where

54:24

they just

54:25

go squash what good is that what does

54:28

that do right um it's that's just as

54:31

good as the critique that everybody just

54:32

goes Bravo great job it's beautiful what

54:36

do that that doesn't do anything for me

54:38

why is it beautiful why Bravo what's

54:40

working what's not working right I mean

54:43

if I I've had clients contact me former

54:45

students who were ready to I had one who

54:48

took down his website and was ready

54:49

ready to quit photography and he was a

54:52

fantastic photographer because he sought

54:55

out a local photographer that he

54:57

respected and admired in his town to

55:00

give him feedback and the guy obviously

55:03

was jealous and threatened by him was my

55:06

deduction and he totally annihilated the

55:08

kid annihilated him and the kid was

55:11

about to quit and I said to him first of

55:14

all that was one person's perspective he

55:16

was competition in your town or your

55:18

competition to him and if someone just

55:21

annihilates you that's that's not a

55:24

critique you you got it's hard to here I

55:26

mean we we hold on to it but you got to

55:29

go get some more feedback right so again

55:32

it's important to help when we give

55:34

feedback to help the people understand

55:37

what's working and what's not working in

55:39

our own humble

55:40

opinions okay so did the visual

55:42

technical choices the photographer make

55:44

help to support a subject and

55:46

communicate

55:49

something okay so let's start looking at

55:52

some images and asking this question

55:54

okay and thinking of our C field

55:58

think and I'm not throwing you the most

56:01

straightforward images all the time

56:03

right

56:04

so um ask yourself this question right

56:09

and this

56:12

question what what words come to mind

56:14

when you look at this Photograph and I

56:17

got nerves of Steel so don't worry I'm

56:19

not going to get offended by 34s one

56:22

quarter okay wet wet random random what

56:27

is it so okay so some people get stuck

56:30

on if they don't know what it is you can

56:32

have a hard time talking about it but

56:33

remember if you don't know what it is

56:35

you can always fall back on all the

56:37

visual what are you seeing visually or

56:39

what are you feeling and if you're not

56:41

feeling anything and then you don't know

56:43

what it is well then you're left with

56:45

talking about the visual

56:47

aspects some people might immediately

56:50

feel something wet right or something

56:53

else um and then other people are just

56:55

going I don't even know what to say

56:57

that's where you go to the visual

56:59

aspects what other words come to mind

57:01

when you look at this image in congruous

57:03

in

57:04

congruous

57:06

confusing okay and for you it evoked a

57:09

feeling of being on a train and looking

57:11

out the

57:12

window it feels sorrowful sorrowful and

57:16

someone else in the room might be going

57:17

I don't get that but that's good for you

57:19

to say it feels sorrowful it feels like

57:21

something's being pulled away because of

57:23

the image on the bright and it's good to

57:25

identify why why it feels like

57:26

something's being pulled away and you

57:28

said because of the image on the right

57:30

okay and I think perhaps maybe it's

57:32

because the image on the right is out of

57:33

focus and there's a sense of

57:35

distance okay so it's good to kind of

57:37

keep going with those thoughts of why

57:40

what choices were made that makes it

57:41

feel that

57:42

way it feels optimistic you use the word

57:46

hopeful spring so let's go a little

57:49

further with that what why do you get

57:51

the sense of what elements there are

57:53

giving you the sense of spring for

57:55

instance yeah the green and the

57:57

raindrops the person's also wearing

57:59

white which could give that feeling of

58:02

hopefulness

58:04

perhaps does it work exactly so I can

58:07

tell you what my thought process was

58:09

around it one person hit on it which was

58:12

spring and hope um however from my

58:16

perspective the fact that and also

58:19

there's people sitting in the room who

58:20

aren't talking of course so it could be

58:22

that half the room felt spring in Hope

58:24

and I'm just not getting that I I mean

58:26

if we're in a critique where the people

58:27

critiquing they're all talking which

58:29

we're not doing here and that's fine

58:31

then you know I'd get more feedback from

58:33

the panel in other words um however if I

58:36

were in a portfolio review and I'd be

58:37

hearing from all these people um when I

58:40

you know when the first words I hear are

58:41

things like in congruent random

58:44

confusing that's important for me to

58:46

hear right that's important for me to go

58:49

okay um that it there's an Inc in

58:53

congruence between the images it left

58:55

people feeling

58:57

confused um you know and then and then

59:00

there was you know a person who sort of

59:02

picked up on the raindrops and the color

59:04

and all of that so is it working or not

59:07

in my opinion even though it's my image

59:10

and I like it and you know there's also

59:12

that element for all of us that you were

59:14

just like I don't really care I don't

59:17

think that my perception of this image

59:19

was communicated clearly um because

59:24

that's not the feedback that I got from

59:25

majority of the people so if I were

59:28

really trying to communicate what the

59:30

one person got then I would have to make

59:32

some other decisions along the way okay

59:36

however because all of our images are

59:38

our own and it's up to us what we want

59:41

our images to do and say um I I didn't

59:44

need this image to clearly communicate

59:47

spring and hope to everyone like to me

59:49

it's just kind of pretty and it means

59:52

those things to me but I'm fine that it

59:55

means other things to other people okay

59:57

but if I were really trying to

59:58

communicate spring and hope I would have

1:00:00

to make some other choices along the way

1:00:02

because that's not what I got from the

1:00:04

crowd and if you're just wondering what

1:00:06

it is I shot rain through a

1:00:09

window um so this is the photograph the

1:00:14

entire photograph was green grass

1:00:16

through a rainy window and then I

1:00:19

composited this image into it which is a

1:00:22

self-portrait of me thrown out of focus

1:00:26

so I work a lot with compositing and dip

1:00:29

ticks and I was kind of playing with the

1:00:31

figure with so yeah now also keep in

1:00:34

mind this is not a critique setting

1:00:37

meaning one person would never be in a

1:00:38

room with 50

1:00:40

people 50 random New Yorkers thank God

1:00:45

getting feedback like this is not that's

1:00:47

not how it works right you you go to a

1:00:48

portfolio review and you talk to five or

1:00:50

six people or you get critiqued from one

1:00:54

other person or a team of professors

1:00:56

that are five people or but I mean I

1:00:59

also understand when you go to camera

1:01:00

clubs you might be in that situation

1:01:02

where a large group of people are

1:01:04

talking to you about your work okay but

1:01:06

you know we have to be a little like

1:01:08

practical about well and that brings up

1:01:10

a good point is you know be careful

1:01:13

about who you seek out feedback

1:01:17

from right okay your mom's always going

1:01:21

to love your work and so is your wife

1:01:24

and husband probably unless unless

1:01:26

they're critical which is great but not

1:01:28

overly critical right um so you know

1:01:32

it's good to seek out feedback from

1:01:34

people you

1:01:36

respect um people who have a lot of

1:01:38

experience at looking a lot at a lot of

1:01:41

images I mean I think that's why I can

1:01:43

bring to the table it's why I even put

1:01:45

together the idea of a critique class I

1:01:48

mean I'm no expert on critique I'm

1:01:50

subjective as well however I do have

1:01:53

that one asset one asset I have a asset

1:01:56

an asset of having had my eyeballs on a

1:02:00

lot of people's work over 15 years like

1:02:04

I've seen a lot of work so there's a

1:02:07

benefit to that right um so it's

1:02:09

important to seek out um work that or

1:02:13

people that you know are capable of

1:02:17

giving you good feedback and perhaps in

1:02:19

that group or Camera Club situation I

1:02:22

mean you all know there's always those

1:02:23

couple people where you just have to go

1:02:25

like la la la la la la la yeah you're

1:02:28

talking but I'm not listening because

1:02:30

they just don't maybe you just don't

1:02:32

jive with each other's work you know or

1:02:34

they just don't get your images or they

1:02:36

just don't like it because we all have

1:02:37

personal preferences as well right so or

1:02:40

they maybe they just don't know how to

1:02:42

give feedback in a constructive way

1:02:44

right so I have a a whole collection of

1:02:46

images that I want us to look at so I'm

1:02:48

going to skip through some of these

1:02:51

images um what are what's let's critique

1:02:55

this image what are some thoughts the

1:02:57

lines I mean I think the story is a

1:03:00

couple the first two things that came

1:03:02

out of people's mouth is the story

1:03:03

besides someone saying the lines and

1:03:05

then I like that you pointed out some of

1:03:07

the visual things of the arms crossed

1:03:09

tells a certain Story the ball several

1:03:12

people have talked about the waiting for

1:03:14

the for the you know owner to play I

1:03:17

mean it's not a new shiny bright green

1:03:20

tennis ball that thing's been through

1:03:23

some some fetch right I mean it's old

1:03:26

it's peeling it's dirty there's the

1:03:29

bright Sun there's the fresh green grass

1:03:32

there's the old ball and then I think

1:03:34

potentially an old dog because of the

1:03:36

white paws but that wouldn't necessarily

1:03:38

have to be this is my image so I know

1:03:40

it's an old dog I do want to make a

1:03:41

comment since this is my image is I

1:03:44

actually ended up going back in and

1:03:46

cloning that out because I found it

1:03:49

distracting too so if I were critiquing

1:03:52

this image um I think I would bring that

1:03:54

up because first of all three odd

1:03:56

numbers you know it creates this Rhythm

1:03:59

and pattern we're going to we're going

1:04:00

to follow that line it mimics this round

1:04:03

shape it's an a you know it's up tucked

1:04:05

into the corner it's bright it's white

1:04:08

and I don't think it adds anything to

1:04:09

the story so I actually went back in and

1:04:12

cloned it out and in reality I should

1:04:13

have just removed it from the scene as I

1:04:15

was shooting but I didn't see it and

1:04:18

then I cloned it out later because I

1:04:20

found it taking away from the story it

1:04:24

was what a lot of people said it was I

1:04:26

mean it's a dog that fetches a whole

1:04:28

bunch right you can tell he uses that

1:04:30

ball a lot um we're taking a break

1:04:33

because I'm like stop please right I can

1:04:36

only fetch for so long he's taken a

1:04:39

break too in the sun it's summer we're

1:04:41

having fun and he's kicking back and

1:04:44

relaxing and enjoying the sunshine while

1:04:46

we're taking a break so it was about

1:04:48

play and summer and fun and fetch I do

1:04:52

want to talk about too and we're going

1:04:54

to I'm going to go there in a second but

1:04:55

when you know when we talk about dip

1:04:57

ticks or trip ticks multiple images used

1:05:00

together or when we look at photographs

1:05:01

in a

1:05:02

series it's important to consider that

1:05:05

right when two images are shown as dip

1:05:07

ticks they're meant to be together and

1:05:09

play off each other so they kind of have

1:05:11

to be talked about they can be talked

1:05:14

about separately but ultimately they

1:05:15

need to be talked about together right

1:05:17

everybody knows what I mean about a dip

1:05:19

tick right two images shown together

1:05:21

purposely so go ahead th throw out some

1:05:25

thought

1:05:26

okay so contrast between the two images

1:05:29

and the color makes you think of one out

1:05:31

of many yes I'm getting a lot of head

1:05:34

nods on that yeah I think the colors

1:05:37

play off each other for sure there's a

1:05:39

lot of similar light Grays dark Grays

1:05:42

earth tones in both of them I think the

1:05:44

color is pretty

1:05:46

prominent okay so the texture is very

1:05:48

prominent for you the um water and wood

1:05:51

natural elements for

1:05:53

sure I mean the word contrast has come

1:05:56

up several times um that this one has a

1:05:58

lot of horizontal movement and this one

1:06:00

has a lot of vertical

1:06:02

movement much about flow was what the

1:06:05

comment was that they're both about flow

1:06:07

I don't know if there's much more to say

1:06:09

about this I mean I like what everybody

1:06:10

said about it you know I mean it was you

1:06:13

know it's about nature it was about that

1:06:15

idea of one and many I picked this one

1:06:19

um River Rock and placed it and took a

1:06:21

photograph of it because I thought it

1:06:23

was so kind of it looked like an egg it

1:06:24

was so perfect shaped and smooth and

1:06:26

beautiful and so I took it and placed it

1:06:29

on the wood down tree and took a picture

1:06:32

and then as I was going through my

1:06:34

images later they were both from the

1:06:36

same day and I liked the idea of both of

1:06:38

them together of the one that was chosen

1:06:40

out of the river and also for me it was

1:06:42

just a memory of the day and the place

1:06:45

and the time and notice also um the

1:06:48

quality of light just because we haven't

1:06:50

been talking about light so um that's

1:06:52

important to talk about in critiques as

1:06:54

well um the light feels warm okay so

1:06:58

when we talk about light and I I do talk

1:07:00

about this in the visual design course

1:07:02

we can talk about temperature Direction

1:07:04

quality hard or soft okay so it's

1:07:07

important to talk about those you can

1:07:08

tell the light's pretty warm here it

1:07:10

looks like it's a sunny day um it's

1:07:13

actually high contrast light here but

1:07:16

soft light here right because here it

1:07:19

has very hard shadows and hard specular

1:07:22

highlights and here there's no Shadow it

1:07:24

feels very soft so those are things we

1:07:26

can talk about as well and critique is

1:07:28

the quality of

1:07:32

light I wanted to show this one as an

1:07:34

example of um I think the choice between

1:07:38

color and black and white potentially

1:07:41

can tell slightly different stories um I

1:07:45

think this one says wedding a lot

1:07:49

more uh and the reason I actually chose

1:07:52

to make it black and white is even

1:07:55

though I think this can also say wedding

1:07:57

I also know it's a wedding so I have

1:07:58

that in my mind so whether that said

1:08:00

that to all of you I'm not sure but it's

1:08:02

mostly because I mean I took the picture

1:08:04

because of the expression of the dog

1:08:06

that looks miserable in this stupid

1:08:08

dress right no no offense no offense to

1:08:12

people who dress up their dogs but I

1:08:13

mean the dog looks miserable right I

1:08:16

just thought it so funny that this dog

1:08:18

was like looking at me sideways its

1:08:20

shoulders are humped it's just like are

1:08:22

you kidding me and I felt like youve

1:08:25

said you know in this picture it's very

1:08:27

much about the blue pretty dress and the

1:08:30

color and the red collar and I just

1:08:33

didn't want any of that distraction I

1:08:35

wanted it to be about the you know the

1:08:38

funny expression on the dog's on the

1:08:40

dog's face um so something to talk about

1:08:43

with black and white when we talked

1:08:44

about the formal aspects of the building

1:08:46

blocks of an image or line shape texture

1:08:48

and color keep in mind that when we

1:08:51

remove color line shape and texture

1:08:54

become much more prominent okay so uh I

1:08:58

do a whole Workshop called seeing in

1:08:59

black and white in Montana um and I mean

1:09:03

we talk about a lot of stuff but that's

1:09:05

one of the things we really focus on is

1:09:06

when we eliminate color uh we need to

1:09:09

really make sure that line texture shape

1:09:13

are very important right so you know

1:09:16

we've talked about what we see what we

1:09:19

feel what we think we've talked about

1:09:21

the subject and the content and the

1:09:24

visual aspects okay the form which also

1:09:26

include the technical choices okay we've

1:09:29

talked about is what we're seeing and

1:09:30

feeling communicating an idea okay but

1:09:34

as we've seen with some photographs and

1:09:35

I want to show you some examples is

1:09:38

sometimes

1:09:39

there's there's one of those elements

1:09:41

that's so outstanding it can't be

1:09:43

ignored right like emotion okay I mean

1:09:47

when I show you this next

1:09:50

image the emotion is the first thing

1:09:54

that hits you okay okay so some images

1:09:57

are just Laden with emotion or reaction

1:10:02

okay and that's important we have to go

1:10:05

with our gut when we give feedback and

1:10:07

when we do critiques you could not skip

1:10:10

over the feeling of this image and begin

1:10:13

to talk about line shape texture and

1:10:16

color I mean in a way it's like doing a

1:10:18

disservice to the image it would be

1:10:20

important to say wow it's very moving or

1:10:25

it's very sad or it makes me angry or

1:10:27

whatever okay um but it'd be really

1:10:30

important to say or to say wow you

1:10:32

created I mean you captured some really

1:10:35

intense emotion here okay emotion I

1:10:40

mean right I think that sometimes

1:10:43

there's an outstanding element of all

1:10:45

these things that we can talk about that

1:10:47

might hit you first and then just start

1:10:50

with that right start with that and then

1:10:52

move to the other things okay I think I

1:10:54

mean to me this emotion it's you know

1:10:56

Joy connection right and then you can

1:10:59

begin to talk about what else in the

1:11:01

scene is is causing that

1:11:05

right sometimes the technique hits you

1:11:07

over the head right we've all seen this

1:11:10

with over thtop HDR whether you like it

1:11:13

or not okay when something is massively

1:11:17

I love the HDR as a verb now when

1:11:19

something is massively

1:11:21

hdred um you can't not talk about that

1:11:24

you have to say wow the technique's

1:11:27

really prominent okay um the technique

1:11:30

of using the scratching here and the

1:11:33

soft

1:11:35

focus I think it's probably one of the

1:11:37

first things you see it's something that

1:11:39

I don't think you could ignore in a

1:11:41

critique is talking about the use of

1:11:44

texture here

1:11:47

okay David Hackney the British painter

1:11:50

who did these combination of um you know

1:11:54

snapshots basically pictures and put

1:11:56

them into collages okay again the

1:11:58

technique here can't be ignored it's

1:12:01

very prominent you can not have this

1:12:03

critique and not talk about you wouldn't

1:12:05

start talking about white balance

1:12:08

immediately right or Focus or lens

1:12:11

choice right you I mean and you'll see

1:12:14

this in some critiques the whole

1:12:16

critique you talk about the technique

1:12:18

and you don't get to anything else

1:12:19

because the some one element is just so

1:12:22

hits you over the head okay

1:12:26

with when we talk about technique as we

1:12:28

all know technique can add to the image

1:12:30

or it can get in the way and it's

1:12:32

important I think to talk about that if

1:12:34

you feel that a technique gets in the

1:12:37

way um you know again soft focused

1:12:41

images can work or not work this is my

1:12:44

image so I have my own opinion I think

1:12:45

in this situation the soft focus Works

1:12:49

where I and this is the same subject in

1:12:51

Ocean where I think in this situation

1:12:53

the soft focus doesn't work

1:12:55

it's both a soft focused shot of the

1:12:58

ocean okay that's just in my

1:13:01

opinion this one works this one not so

1:13:03

much so it'd be important to talk about

1:13:05

that and say

1:13:08

why here are some other techniques that

1:13:10

can get in the way right we've all seen

1:13:13

it and it's good to experiment with all

1:13:15

this stuff right but you know sometimes

1:13:17

it's hard to even talk about the subject

1:13:20

the form or the content when the

1:13:22

Photoshop filter is hitting you over the

1:13:24

head

1:13:25

right or the crazy Borders or the HDR or

1:13:30

whatever and that's where it'd be

1:13:32

important to not knock it down because

1:13:33

you don't like it like wow I hate over

1:13:35

the top HDR this is horrible but you'd

1:13:37

say you'd have to say to the

1:13:38

photographer or maybe you'd say the

1:13:40

photographer um wow the use of that

1:13:43

photoshop filter is really strong it's

1:13:45

actually the first thing I see when I

1:13:47

look at this image um the filter is

1:13:49

actually even obscuring the form or

1:13:51

content or subject for me so if you can

1:13:54

talk to the photograph for personally um

1:13:56

what was your reasoning for doing that

1:13:58

why why so heavy on the filter and maybe

1:14:01

they have a reason and they can tell you

1:14:02

right so again it's that intent but if

1:14:05

they're just like I don't know I liked

1:14:06

it then it' be like okay well it's kind

1:14:09

of getting in the way for me and this is

1:14:11

why

1:14:13

right sometimes the story is the thing

1:14:16

that is prominent right this is

1:14:19

Christian ban not Christian bansky

1:14:21

Edward p berinsky Canadian photographer

1:14:24

Who does these large scale images um

1:14:27

about our impact on the environment okay

1:14:30

so again probably wouldn't be talking

1:14:32

about the repetitive circles here first

1:14:35

but we'll be talking about the the

1:14:37

meaning and the

1:14:38

symbolism okay again story can be very

1:14:42

strong yeah this is that South African

1:14:44

photographer again Jurgen shodg Jurgen

1:14:48

so sometimes the symbol can be really

1:14:50

strong okay and it's important when

1:14:53

there's really strong symbols or I

1:14:56

should maybe I should say loaded symbols

1:14:58

loaded

1:15:00

symbolism um we can't ignore it right

1:15:04

but we also I think have to be very

1:15:05

aware when there is a loaded symbol of

1:15:08

what we bring to it in a critique right

1:15:11

obviously there's a lot of loaded

1:15:13

symbolism around this figure and there's

1:15:16

more loaded symbolism now than five

1:15:19

years ago and it could be different in

1:15:21

two years right so you know when someone

1:15:25

puts something in their image or has an

1:15:27

image that's loaded with symbolism again

1:15:30

it can't be ignored but that's where I

1:15:32

think you got to navigate carefully um

1:15:35

you know another loaded symbol that's

1:15:39

going to have very different meaning for

1:15:41

very different people in the room

1:15:44

right so my point is just when there's

1:15:47

heavily loaded symbolism it needs to be

1:15:49

talked about but you know we also have

1:15:51

to really think about what we're

1:15:52

bringing to it and what the

1:15:54

photographers intend

1:15:57

was when there's text in an image text

1:16:00

is very prominent okay when there's text

1:16:03

in an image signage text we read it

1:16:05

immediately we can't ignore it and it

1:16:08

can also very much change the content of

1:16:10

an image or the story of an image okay

1:16:13

so that always has to be addressed and

1:16:15

also to just know that any text included

1:16:18

in an image it's the first place that

1:16:20

we're going to look because we read

1:16:22

words okay so we have to assume when

1:16:24

there's text in an image that it's

1:16:26

really meant to communicate something

1:16:29

right imagine this image if you would

1:16:31

have seen just this or now you're seeing

1:16:34

it with the text

1:16:36

included his name's Jim Goldberg and he

1:16:39

did this whole series of images where he

1:16:41

took snapshots of people and then asked

1:16:43

them to write on the print so they wrote

1:16:45

what they wanted what they wanted their

1:16:47

caption to be okay so again if we just

1:16:50

saw this image we would have a

1:16:52

completely different critique than when

1:16:55

you see it in the context of how the

1:16:56

photographer presented it it also made a

1:16:59

difference that I explained to you that

1:17:01

the person in the photograph wrote The

1:17:04

caption okay so again when you get into

1:17:06

more conceptual images you know it's

1:17:09

important to to understand more of the

1:17:11

context if you

1:17:14

can what about beauty we can get sucked

1:17:17

in by Beauty right it's just I it's

1:17:20

almost hard to critique this image it's

1:17:22

just like wow um so just to keep in mind

1:17:24

that when something's really beautiful

1:17:27

it's very easy to be like it's so

1:17:29

beautiful I love

1:17:30

it and that's fine to say but then start

1:17:33

to talk about why why is it working so

1:17:36

much why I mean yes she's beautiful but

1:17:39

then you can talk about the light the

1:17:41

quality of light the composition the

1:17:44

lines the shapes the expression all

1:17:46

those things of why it's working so much

1:17:49

on the other side of this is when

1:17:50

something's not beautiful to us and I'm

1:17:53

not stating that this is not beautiful

1:17:55

but I think everybody can agree beauty

1:17:57

and this is more of like a

1:17:59

mundane everyday scene okay so you know

1:18:04

some images are going to be strikingly

1:18:06

beautiful other images are meant to and

1:18:09

I'm not saying this one in particular

1:18:10

but some images we've all seen them are

1:18:11

sort of meant to repulse right or aren't

1:18:14

about beauty but we still need to be

1:18:16

able to talk about those as well and

1:18:19

then you talk about the formal aspects

1:18:21

and the technical choices and the

1:18:22

content and the meaning this is Wolf

1:18:25

Gang tilman's German

1:18:29

photographer some images are meant to be

1:18:31

shocking right this is actually an

1:18:34

advertisement this is Mark zybert the

1:18:36

great commercial photographer so he

1:18:39

wants it to be shocking because there's

1:18:41

a message right it says last year 16

1:18:44

million gallons of oil were consumed to

1:18:46

make plastic water bottles so it was an

1:18:49

advertisement um so my point is as

1:18:53

though is um you know if you're going to

1:18:55

critique images and give feedback it's

1:18:58

really easy when an image is shocking or

1:18:59

ugly to be like you know just like when

1:19:03

we see art in a gallery I'm guessing

1:19:05

most of you don't because you're New

1:19:06

Yorkers so you're pretty awesome when it

1:19:09

comes to Art but you know when we see

1:19:11

art we don't understand it's really easy

1:19:13

to just be like I don't get it I don't

1:19:15

like it um or we can approach it and go

1:19:20

H what's going on

1:19:22

here okay so I said I would talk a

1:19:24

little a little bit about abstract

1:19:25

images so an abstract image is when the

1:19:27

form is often simplified or magnified or

1:19:31

the meaning or the subject is obscured

1:19:33

right like we maybe we don't know what

1:19:35

it is we don't know what it is we don't

1:19:38

know what the photographer is doing or

1:19:39

saying we don't understand the technique

1:19:42

any of those can be obscured or unclear

1:19:44

to us and it could be hard to talk about

1:19:46

abstract images because we're sort of

1:19:48

like I don't know um so when we talk

1:19:51

about abstract images if we don't know

1:19:53

what the subject is

1:19:55

and we don't know what the meaning is

1:19:57

well what are we left with the visual

1:20:00

okay so often with abstract images you

1:20:03

simply talk about the visual aspects of

1:20:05

the image because you might not get

1:20:08

anything else out of it you might be

1:20:09

like I don't know what it is I don't

1:20:11

know what you're trying to say but I can

1:20:13

at least tell you what I'm seeing line

1:20:16

shape texture color technical choices

1:20:20

okay so this is great photographer Harry

1:20:23

Callahan

1:20:25

we may or may not know what it

1:20:27

is we may or may not know what he's

1:20:29

trying to

1:20:30

communicate but what can we talk about

1:20:33

here I mean you would probably

1:20:34

immediately talk about the line you'd

1:20:36

probably talk about the lack of detail

1:20:39

in black or white you would talk about

1:20:41

it being grayscale right and then you

1:20:43

might talk about what you what it

1:20:44

reminds you of or what you think of it

1:20:46

right gesture yeah gesture right

1:20:50

balance okay so again with abstract

1:20:53

images if you you if you can't tell the

1:20:55

technique if you don't know what it is

1:20:58

um you just fall back on those formal

1:21:01

aspects and then perhaps you also get a

1:21:04

mood or a feeling from it and talk about

1:21:06

that or perhaps you don't at all and you

1:21:09

say that

1:21:12

okay so I'm just bringing this up

1:21:14

because I think a lot of people get

1:21:15

turned off by images abstract images

1:21:18

that they don't get um and it's good to

1:21:20

have the skill of talking about those as

1:21:23

well

1:21:25

zuda bar

1:21:27

again Aon

1:21:30

cisin so much you can still talk about

1:21:32

without having to know what it is or

1:21:34

what it means

1:21:37

right okay we talked about multiple

1:21:39

images when images are seen together we

1:21:42

need to talk about them as a collective

1:21:44

okay especially dip ticks and trip ticks

1:21:47

right they're put together for a purpose

1:21:50

I'm also using these as examples because

1:21:52

like in the last example with the River

1:21:54

Rocks

1:21:55

sometimes the subjects are very similar

1:21:57

to each other meaning you can almost

1:21:58

tell they're shot in the same location

1:22:00

and sometimes they're very disparate and

1:22:03

sometimes the desparate cryp um dip

1:22:05

ticks are kind of even more fun for the

1:22:07

viewer because then you start to try to

1:22:09

make connections between the images

1:22:10

there's a reason the photographer put

1:22:12

them together so what's the connection

1:22:14

okay so it's important in multiple

1:22:16

images to talk about that connection and

1:22:18

that can be visually as far as color

1:22:21

scale texture and it can be conceptu as

1:22:24

far as mood idea

1:22:30

okay okay I talked in the beginning

1:22:32

about context and intention are

1:22:34

important to know if we can we can't

1:22:36

always okay but this is an example if

1:22:39

you came to this image individually you

1:22:40

might be like what's going on

1:22:43

here it's confusing it's disturbing it's

1:22:46

funny whatever you think it is however

1:22:49

when I show you the

1:22:51

series okay maybe some more pieces get

1:22:53

filled in but then most importantly

1:22:56

would be the context that this is a

1:22:58

photographer who was a father of an

1:23:00

autistic child trying to convey what the

1:23:04

world feels like to his autistic child

1:23:08

okay so an example where the artist

1:23:11

statement the titles the understanding

1:23:13

of the series is really important to the

1:23:16

series okay so I'm also saying that you

1:23:19

know sometimes hold back judgment or or

1:23:23

try to get more information

1:23:25

if we can to understand the context a

1:23:27

little more

1:23:31

okay as I said earlier if something is

1:23:34

technically off it needs to be addressed

1:23:37

okay uh I took this wedding shot um her

1:23:40

face is out of focus I missed the focus

1:23:42

it's on her dress it's a

1:23:44

problem okay it needs to be addressed

1:23:47

her face is not in Focus her

1:23:49

expression's important I missed it okay

1:23:53

um what's off in this shot

1:23:56

technically white balance totally off

1:23:59

you can't you can't ignore it and you're

1:24:01

not hurting people's feelings you're

1:24:02

just being honest the white balance is

1:24:04

off okay it should be more like this

1:24:06

needs to be talked about right focus is

1:24:09

off in this one I me being the

1:24:12

photographer okay but I think it's a

1:24:14

little more accept I think it's okay in

1:24:16

this one that the focus isn't on his

1:24:18

eyes because it's a very shallow depth

1:24:22

of field it feels intentional and about

1:24:24

the connection between the man and the

1:24:26

dog right okay I think I've sort of been

1:24:30

saying this all along okay but um you

1:24:34

know just give reasoning and

1:24:36

explanation for where you're coming from

1:24:39

but I just want to follow up with a few

1:24:41

final

1:24:43

suggestions um always begin with

1:24:45

something positive

1:24:48

please and objective maybe you know

1:24:52

meaning maybe the first thing out of

1:24:53

your mouth isn't like oh I just this is

1:24:56

so confusing I don't even know what it

1:24:58

is maybe it's like oh well I see lots of

1:25:01

varying lines I see um this I see that

1:25:05

and I'm a little confused okay

1:25:09

um stay on point it's how many times

1:25:12

have you been in a critique where the

1:25:13

person rolls off on I mean I've been in

1:25:16

critiques in grad school where the next

1:25:17

thing I know we're talking about the

1:25:19

history of feminism and I'm like um can

1:25:22

we talk about my image right here what

1:25:24

are you talking about okay so it's one

1:25:26

thing to reference Picasso or feminism

1:25:29

or something but then bring it back to

1:25:31

the image to try to stay on point make

1:25:34

it about the image and not yourself

1:25:36

we've all been there too right where the

1:25:38

person waxs poetic for 20 minutes about

1:25:40

what they would have done and their own

1:25:42

images and their own experience and

1:25:43

their own everything okay so we need to

1:25:46

make it about the

1:25:48

image give suggestions for how to

1:25:51

improve in your own personal opinion how

1:25:54

to make it better or more communicative

1:25:57

and end on a positive note as

1:25:59

well so you know if we're helping

1:26:02

someone it really helps to begin with a

1:26:03

positive and end on a positive all right

1:26:11

everybody

Continue with YouTLDR

Analyze another video with Pro

Process a new video, search every timestamp, compare sources, and keep the result in your library.

Get Pro — $12/month30-day money-back guarantee

More transcripts

Explore other videos transcribed with YouTLDR.