He Sold Everything... Here’s What He’s Buying
Graham Stefen built his entire brand on
real estate, becoming the voice of
rental property investing on YouTube,
starting with a small $59,000 house
renovation and turning that into a
multi-million dollar empire. And now
he's selling it. Not one property. He's
not trimming his portfolio. He's selling
everything. And at the same time, he's
shutting down businesses, selling his
forever home, and essentially
simplifying his investments across the
board. When someone like Graham Stefen
walks away from the thing that made him,
you pay attention. What does he see that
everyone else is missing? Today on Dumb
Money, he sold everything and we're
going to show you what he's buying.
>> This is Dumb Money Live.
>> Hey there, Dave here along with Chris
and Jordan. We are Dumb Money. Welcome
to Dumb Money Live. Quick reminder, if
you don't mind, uh, smash the like
button for the almighty algorithm.
Graham would be very proud if you smash
that for us. Uh, thank you guys for
joining us this morning, especially
those of you trolling us in the live
chat for delaying this episode not once
but twice. Technical difficulties
scheduling on our end. You might you
might tell Chris is remote right now.
He's he's many time zones away in Hawaii
right now. I don't know if you can uh
fill us in on anything that you're
working on there.
>> Yeah, I'm uh I'm here for a reality type
I guess YouTube show. Uh, you had the
pick, Dave, that floating platform in
the middle of the ocean they built.
>> I haven't. I'll I'll try to pull that up
and we can we can show a little bit more
about what you're doing later in the
show. Yeah. But we do want to talk to
Graham Stefen selling everything. He
posted this video that got 240,000 views
on YouTube and a post on X that just
went crazy viral. Uh, 3.6 million views
so far. It's all about why he's selling
all of his remaining uh rental
properties in LA. uh and he he goes into
the financial reasons, the non-financial
reasons, the kind of broader context of
uh uh real estate in California,
but the thing we're most interested in
is what he's doing with the proceeds. Um
because he gives a lot of financial
reasons. We've been saying this for
years, real estate, it's it's it's
messy. It's timeconuming. It's not
liquid. Uh, and Graham finally realized
that his net cash flow after all of his
expenses and taxes, insurance,
maintenance, all of that, he's only
making like four to 5%. Which he says is
like, why am I why am I taking all of
this extra time and energy to do what I
could do with a Treasury bond, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. So, um, when you guys sent all
this stuff to me, I don't actually watch
Graham. So, like I thought that he was
like a I thought he was like a dividend
investor guy. I didn't realize he did
real estate. Is that bad?
>> It's It's been a while since uh you've
you've uh hung out with Graham. No,
Graham is the buy and hold S&P and he he
got his start in real estate and
continues to manage or or continued to
manage a bunch of properties in LA. Uh
but he's just buy the S&P and hold the
S&P and he's changing that. He's he's
he's come out with a whole new strategy.
So I we have things to talk about,
>> but basically LA real estate is not
passive. It is, you know, people talk
about passive investments. It is
anything but.
>> Oh, Dave, no real estate is passive.
Jordan, by the way, Graham makes you
look like a degenerate gambler uh in
terms of how conservative he is with his
money, which I always have thought was
just ridiculously too conservative. This
is this is such an awesome thing when I
saw that note go out because, you know,
every time we're around him or I I'm
always obviously,
you know, promoting get more aggressive,
dude. Get get into the stocks. Get
leverage, dude. get it. And I I felt I
felt like the transition was happening
even before he sent that note out. And
when he when he did the post, I was
like, "Yeah, it finally happened." But
>> full disclosure, Chris and I have been
on his podcast a couple of times. Chris
is on it all the time. And you are
continuously telling him, "Get more
aggressive. You are, you know, these are
your investments are basically you're
you're 95% in cash." Why? Well, the last
time I was there, he f he he he bought
Amazon at 197 right at the low. And he's
>> I know. And I think that's part of it.
Like he's just like, "What if I would
have been doing this a long time ago?"
But here's the thing. This is this is a
conversation. It's an argument that
we've been having with so many people
and so many friends for the last 20
years. And quite honestly, it was a
harder argument back in the day because
most of the appreciation, and I don't
think people truly understand this, I
don't even want to say most, but a good
chunk of the appreciation in buying
houses and renting them out for cash
flow. It's all about the the increase in
value of that home over time. It's not
about the actual cash flow because more
times than than not, the cash flow that
you're generating from a rental property
that you purchased is so much lower than
you think it is, okay? Because of
maintenance, vacancies, capex, uh,
surprises, property management fees.
There are a million things that will
eventually dent your cash flow and your
returns in residential real estate. And
when you really dig in deep with guys
that have been doing this for like 20
years and they're close to you, they
will whisper to you and they will admit
that after all the repairs, after all
the maintenance, all they're all like on
the edge of getting out of it like
because like it's not what you think it
is. They're like we we're actually
making our money
>> based on the appreciation of the real
estate. So even if the cash flow is zero
with when you account for the
maintenance and all the headaches and
all the BS you got to deal with. Even if
that's zero, they're still making like
singledigit mids singledigit returns on
the appreciation. But guys, and and
yeah, the dream on paper is that that
your renter pays for all of your costs
and then some and then you're going to
make this big bank when you actually
sell the property at some point in the
future. But in a market like LA, the
appreciation has not really been on the
trajectory that historically it has
been. So it's it's like
>> well really from what I understand the
benefit is the leverage, right? So you
can buy a property, you leverage 80% of
it and your renter is basically paying
off that 80%. And so that that's where
you make your money even if the value of
the property doesn't go up.
>> Well, you get all that debt paid for.
But Jordan, that's that that's that's
hidden risk, right? And this is what
we're talking about. Like I think real
estate gives you the illusion of safety
because it's tangible.
>> But the reality is is once you get into
that game, you're taking on a lot of
leverage usually. And when
>> a ton of leverage, nobody goes out
that's in this game and just pays500
or $700,000 for a rental house. they put
down, you know, $100,000 and the rest of
it's debt.
>> Correct. Um, but there there is a
tremendous amount of risk in that
leverage, especially when things go
wrong, the market reverses, you're still
having to pay for repairs and at some
point you even get trapped in these
homes that you have leverage in. It is
that that kind of like that black swan
risk that real estate investors don't
fully appreciate because it doesn't come
around that often. But the risk is real.
It's there. You are in a levered asset
that's completely eliquid. Okay? An
eliquid asset that you cannot get out of
quickly at all. Real estate looks really
safe, but often you're just hiding that
risk in the leverage and the illiquidity
that you have in that asset. And for two
decades, I've been telling people, yeah,
real estate's okay compared to doing
nothing with your money, but compared to
equities, you're not even playing the
same game. If if you would have taken
all that money that you were putting
into real estate and all that time and
you would have just thrown that into
aggressive equities over the past, dude,
I don't care. You're always winning with
equities. And guess what? Equities gets
you your life back. You have a 100% of
your time. Like, you're not doing any
work. There's no stress. Fully liquid.
Like, it it is insane to me that people
just their whole life is on the real
estate track as opposed to the equity
track. I love I love that even the
biggest real estate guy ever who's been
preaching this is like, I'm done. And I
know LA is the worst of the worst in
that market, but still, it's the same
way across the country. Dave, we have
real estate friends here in Texas.
They're they're doing the same thing.
They're getting out of real estate into
equities. Same exact thing. Well, if you
just do the math and look at your what
your returns would have been if if
Graham went back and looked at what he
would have done if he had sold all of
his properties in 2020 or in
2018, you know, it just it and all of
the the mental energy and stress that
went into what he actually tried to do
in LA was uh it was just
the numbers would be uh way different
had he had he taken our advice. long
ago. That's all that's all I can say.
>> So, my my four things that I want all
the real estate guys uh to know that are
kind of evaluating real estate versus,
you know, investing in equity, right?
With equity, with public market
equities, you get liquidity plus
optionality, and that always wins. Okay?
You can buy and sell anything instantly.
You have all of your liquidity. um you
have true compounding versus trapped
equity in real estate meaning the
equities are going to compound cleanly
with dividends price appreciation real
estate returns get eaten up by all the
vacancies the maintenance affairs the
property
>> manage financial instruments you can
hedge your investments also and
>> you're right you could you could always
hedge and it's really easy to hedge you
Jordan you have time leverage uh with
equity with stocks you have no
operational load with real estate it's a
full-time job or part-time job unless
you outsource it, which is again is
going to kill your returns and your
>> I rented a house out once and it was the
worst. It was the worst. I mean, it was
like it was it was phone calls on the
weekends, you know, it was constant
problems. It was something went wrong
with the house, so now we've got to
write a big check to a plumber or
whoever to come fix problems. You have
none of those issues with an equity.
Like people are going to call you and
say, "Hey, Jordan, you own a thousand
shares of Amazon. Uh, we need you to,
you know, we need to,
>> we need you to come repair the warehouse
door. The warehouse door is stuck. We
need you to come deal with that for us,
Jordan.
>> That's right.
>> But, but Jordan, the real estate guys
will never talk about that because they
don't they want it to seem like they're
in this great investment and they don't
want people to know how hard they're
working or all their until they do until
they come out and then when they crack
and they start telling you all this
stuff, they admit that man, I wish I
just never got involved in this because
it's not what I thought it was. But the
by the way the fourth thing is very
important simply better risk adjusted
returns. Okay you know broad-based
equities generally returning 10% uh
annualize over the long term. Real
estate looks safer but the truth is that
those returns are like mid to high
singledigit but roughly half of those
returns are from price appreciation. And
now that we're in a world where you can
no longer count on the price
appreciation coming from just everything
goes up up up in real estate, we've seen
that that's not true. There is a real
risk factor there that your total
returns for all the work and all the
risk and all the ili liquidity is low
single digits. Like you're doing all of
that for low single digits when you can
be getting double to maybe triple in the
market where your only work is on your
phone. You could be doing it from the
beach. You could be doing it from
anywhere in the world, right? You're not
a landlord.
>> Yeah. The other problem is you got
really big liquidity lumps, right? So,
um you know, when you sell a house, it's
a really big event, right? It could be
$500,000. It could be a million dollars
um that you're having to take out. Maybe
you didn't need that. Hey, with stocks,
you can just sell some. You just sell a
little bit, whatever you need.
>> You You're right. And listen, there's
all these unexpected things that are
happening now. And part of the reason
why real estate is getting crushed is,
you know, the cost to replace an HVAC
unit today versus eight years ago.
Massively more expensive. The cost to
basically do anything in terms of
maintenance and repairs on your home is
so much higher right now than it was 5
to 10 years ago. And these things are
absolutely crushing the guys that have
20, 30 houses out there that the bills
are coming in and the margins on what
you're making in that ROI are not large
enough to to handle the bump in in cost
of ownership for these landlords. It's
it's terrible.
So, I I love it. I love it that like
Graham came to that conclusion
completely on his own. And I it's not
just him. It's so many real estate guys
that I know that are doing the same
exact thing right now. They're they're
moving into the markets.
>> So, let's talk about what he's doing
with the proceeds because we are very
still very different than Graham. Graham
is still super conservative compared to
us. And if you guys haven't yet
subscribe to Graham's newsletter, I
would highly recommend it. It's
completely free. You can find it from
his expost. I subscribe and I have
broken down his exact portfolio and
we're going to reveal all of that and
we're going to compare it to ours, the
the exact percentages of of where he's
allocating his money and how we allocate
our money. So, I a little tease, but
he's basically he's passive. He's uh
diversified. He's, you know, he's always
been that S&P 500 buy and hold investor
and he still does a lot of that, but
he's he's starting to diversify a little
bit more. So I think that's that's
interesting and we need to talk about
that.
>> Uh let's see. Go ahead. Hit what is it?
What does he got?
>> So and and it's a long article so I've
summarized it so I don't don't have to
uh like parse through it but basically
Graham is going to be 40 to 45% in
stocks and generally that is S&P 500.
Those are US equities.
>> Now let's compare that to to us. I am
usually 110% in stocks because I use
margin to buy stocks and then
occasionally options on top of that.
Chris,
>> uh, I have to check my balance. I've
kind of come off margin a little bit.
Dude, I am not I'm being really really
conservative right now. This is actually
nuts. Oh, I guess I'm I'm not accounting
for the options though that I have.
Okay, just in terms of equity, I'm
obviously always at least 130% equity to
200% equity. So, at this moment, I'm
kind of at 140% equity, which is really
conservative for me. But that doesn't
include uh stock options that I have,
which you know, I have, as you guys
know, I've been playing Amazon options
for the last few weeks like a complete
degenerate.
and it's worked in my favor, but I have
anywhere between I would say five and
15%
maybe maybe at one point it was as high
as 20% of my entire liquid portfolio was
in Amazon options. So, and these are
options that are like at the money
expiring in a week or two or three. So,
you know, if Amazon goes down $1, I lose
10 to 20% of my entire portfolio. That's
how confident I've been in Amazon.
>> You're so leveraged that on the most
conservative day you're 130% and
sometimes you're 500%.
>> 200%. But if you add the options in
Yeah. I mean, you start adding the
options, I think you can make an
argument that I'm 300%
uh 300% equity
>> between between the equity, the the
margin, excuse me, between the equity uh
the margin balance and then the options
300%. Is at at my most degenerate
moments.
>> That's uh pretty pretty insane. And I
think this would be the time that you
say you're not a financial advisor and
this is not something that anybody at
home should try to play along with.
>> I mean, look at me. Who who would want
to copy trade this guy? You got to be
out of your mind. Uh, no. No. This this
is this is about our risk risk
tolerance. And if you've been watching
the show the last seven years, you know
that Jordan's risk tolerance is the
polar opposite of mine. Dave sits
somewhere in the middle. I don't know.
Graham probably I didn't think it was
possible, but Graham like is is beyond
where Jordan is in terms of
>> It sounds like he's um way less
aggressive than I am.
>> So, how aggressive are you right now,
Jordan?
>> Me? Uh yeah. So, what I tend to do
>> um is I keep about Chris is going to
freak out when I say this. I keep about
a decade of cash.
>> Oh jeez. So, a decade worth of living
expenses in cash and then I invest the
rest. Um,
you know, what percentage does that
shake out at? Uh, well, the market's
been going up, so less now. I don't
know. Probably I'm probably like
80% invested. Um,
but I also have I also, you know, I I do
stock options and stuff like that too in
an aggressive account. So that that
would push that up, you know, in uh in
notional, but
>> yeah, but somewhere around 80%.
>> Yeah, but I like I like to keep a
healthy cash position and it's not cash
cash. It's in a you know, it's in a
money market that returns
>> whatever four something percent.
>> And we we'll talk about cash because
that is a big holding for for Graham and
not such a big holding for me and Chris
and a decade worth for you, Jordan.
>> All right. You don't want to know what
mine is, Dave? I I I do have some cash
in my bank account. I
>> Yeah. How much cash do you have in your
bank account?
>> I keep between three to six Well, about
I'd say two to six months of cash is
what I have. And I've been really
fortunate the past four years to have
one of the greatest cash flowing
businesses on Earth. Uh a Pokemon trade
show called Collecticon. For those that
you have been following me, you know, we
started this about four and a half years
ago. It is it started in the back of a
banquet room of a hotel. Uh, I'm an
owner of Collecticon and a founder with
my three business partners. And if you
kind of Google Collecticon right now,
you can read the press release or the
Hollywood Reporter uh, news article that
came out a few days ago. We sold the
company to Ari Emanuel uh, and you know,
the same kind of entity that owns like
what WWE and and uh, MMA and all that
stuff. So, I no longer have any cash
flow coming from Collecticon. And by the
way, it has been
>> that was going to be I was going to talk
about that after the show because that
deserves a huge congratulations. Your
your sale of Collecticon. Uh we people
have been talking about it in the uh in
the live chat already.
>> That congratulations. You you've now uh
>> surpassed a new milestone. Well, well,
Dave, it is the biggest exit I've ever
had from a private company. And quite
honestly, it's how I've been able to be
so aggressive on Amazon the last few
weeks because I knew there was like a 70
then 80 then 90% chance of the deal
closing. And I was like, worst case
scenario, half of the money I make on
this deal is wiped out because I lost
out on those Amazon calls. But I
wouldn't have been as aggressive on
Amazon without knowing that that big
chunk of money was coming in. It did
close. It's awesome. And like it feels
great, but now I need to make that money
grow because my cash flow, guys, has
gone down by like 90%. My restaurants do
pretty well, but listen, restaurant bars
don't cash flow that much. Uh, so now
I'm back to the pulling money from my
brokerage account every couple months,
two to three months to support my
lifestyle, which Jordan, that would
drive you nut. You do the same thing, I
guess, Jordan, don't you? You have to
pull money because you don't have cash
flow. You You haven't had cash flow in a
long time, right?
>> Like cash.
>> Yeah, I know. So that's why you're so
conservative. I'm in the same boat as
you now.
>> I don't have my cash flow engine
anymore. Collecticon is gone.
>> So now I I I need to think about that
more intently. At least
>> I've been in that boat for a while.
>> You could buy the You could buy some
dividend stocks.
>> Uh well, no. I'm not doing that.
>> I'm not I'm not doing that. You know,
the way I think about my my my equities
is I always assume that it will go down
by 70%. So, the number in my head when I
look at my portfolio, I subtract 70%.
And that's the number and as long as I'm
comfortable with that number, I'm I'm
good.
>> Yeah. For me, I think about it like um
everything liquid, I feel comfortable
with it going down 50%. But that's
including a large
uh money market fund. But I so what I
think about really is that the 10 years
of cash is a let's say that we had like
a 2008 style happen right now.
>> I should have enough cash to get me
through without having to sell any
equities for that decade trough.
>> But you if you can afford that that as
such a like a mind you your mind can
just be at ease with that for me.
>> That's right. Yeah. I'm totally at ease
with the with them. If the market went
down 50%.
I would not think about it.
>> But then actually reduce your 10ear
runway to five years and put more uh of
your
>> Well, I would do that too. Yeah. So that
it's cash to put to work too, right?
>> But our stocks did go down 50% basically
a month ago. Like my portfolio was down
40%. The whole thing.
>> Oh, my portfolio was down like I mean
inclusive of everything like 5%. Oh,
Jordan, when my portfolio was down 40%,
that is when I double triple down on
>> I bought I didn't go insane, but I
bought when when the market dropped like
10%. I dro I bought a bunch of stuff.
>> The best buy that I had was ARM. Uh the
thing was up 30% since I bought.
>> But you didn't change your allocation
towards equities like like you're not
deeper in equities now because of that
drop.
>> Yes.
>> Oh, you are. Okay. Good. Good.
>> But you still have a 10ear runway in
cash. Huh?
>> But you still have a 10-year runway in
cash.
>> Yeah.
>> Even after Dave, there's a caveat though
that we're not thinking about with
Jordan. When he says 10 years of cash,
people don't actually understand how
little cash Jordan uses. He is the most
frugal. He's literally on gram level in
terms of frugality of lifestyle. He is
one of the most frugal lifestyle guys I
have ever known. He tweaks his sprinkler
system to save like $4 a month. Okay.
Like like Jordan, I don't even want to
know what you spend a month. It has got
to be so low. It is completely
ridiculous how cheap you are.
>> I I have a bit high. I probably don't
have as much expense as you do, Chris,
but I um think I'm in in between in
between you two, but I try to keep a
one-year buffer in my checking account
at all times just because. And I use my
uh I use the stock market as my cash
flow engine. So I don't I don't need an
actual cash flow engine. I'm just making
enough money in the stock market that I
keep replenishing and have a nice buffer
in my checking account.
>> I I think I'm in the same boat as you
now for the rest of my life, Dave. I
don't think I'll ever have cash flow
like I had the last four or five years.
Um
>> it's the way to do it. It's so much It's
so much better. I highly recommend it
now. Okay. So Graham is 45%ish
in US stocks. He's 25% in cash and
treasuries. But his biggest increase
here is international and emerging
markets. He is increasing for
diversification. He's seen strong recent
performance uh of 26% versus the S&P 16%
hedged against US stagnation with higher
growth potential from AI adoption and
lower baseline economies. He is putting
28% of his portfolio in international
emerging markets. How does that compare?
>> That is first of all, that is quite the
move for someone like him. That's really
aggressive.
>> Aggressive to me.
>> I Okay, so Jordan, I haven't gone in
deep on due diligence, but this is
actually a trade that I'm interested in.
If you really think deeply about AI,
automation, robotics,
how the world economy is going to change
over the next 20 years, there is a case
to be made that third world countries to
some extent will see some of the biggest
lift. Uh develop at least not maybe not
fully third world but like developmental
stage countries. I I saw a report that I
haven't had the time to read yet that
said Brazil was in the pole position to
benefit from the AI super cycle the next
couple of decades. I want to spend a lot
of time doing research before I make
that move. I'm assuming he has already.
It's interesting, guys. It It's really
interesting because all of a sudden,
you're democratizing intelligence.
You're democratizing the ability to, you
know, manufacture, right? You're
democratizing essentially everything.
And once you do that, you're getting rid
of the edge that you have or or third
world developmental stage countries are
able to do things that they could never
ever do because they just didn't have
the the intelligent population to
actually put things in motion. where in
an AI age
>> that intelligence just exists and it's
just freely available for any
government, any company, right? Like to
come in and and meaningfully improve uh
an economy. So I it's it's interesting.
I haven't done it yet.
>> It's something that I actually have done
and I've done it through ETFs instead of
trying to pick individual random stocks
in a market that I know nothing about.
>> Yeah, you can't. And a lot I mean like
trying to trade individual stocks
internationally on a large scale is
really hard.
>> Yeah. And so that it to me that's just
the easy button way of doing it where I
can I can be in that section of my
portfolio I would imagine will I I'm I'm
hoping grows faster than the S&P section
of my portfolio, but who knows? Um, but
I'm I would say I'm generally between
zero and 10% in international. Uh, I own
a property in Mexico, so that is not
really an investment, but that is a
chunk of money sitting in a developing
country. Um, but now I uh I'm
comfortably
10 to 15% in these emerging developing
international markets.
Jordan, are you in any at all?
>> What? International equities?
>> Yeah,
>> of course. Yeah. Um
>> like like developmental countries like
not just
>> Yeah, I mean China. So we got like C Web
um
>> ETF. Oh, at some point we need to come
back around to this subject uh when
we've done the research because it's an
interesting play here.
>> I think it's a Yeah, I think that could
be a whole show in itself. And speaking
of whole shows, Chris, I've noticed you
uh didn't retweet this episode.
>> Thank you, Dave. I'm I'm on I'm on
Hawaii
>> time here and my just not thinking.
>> We'll let you do that while we talk
about uh the next big chunk of Graham's
portfolio because that that pretty much
accounts for most of it. But he is
shifting from a tiny position to a
meaningful asymmetric bet on in
institutional inflows, ETF adoption,
debt uh deficit hedging on Bitcoin. He
is increasing likely to 10 uh 5 to 10%
of his portfolio allocated in Bitcoin.
>> We've kind of been in that low to high
single digits Bitcoin for a long time.
I'm at the lowest I've ever been in
Bitcoin. I want to say it's like 1% of
my portfolio right now. I'm not against
bring it up to two, maybe 3%.
But I don't necessarily I think there's
just too much opportunity in equities
right now with this AI super cycle.
There's I don't want to have money
sitting in an asset that's not directly
touching that super cycle.
>> Yeah. I mean Yeah. Yeah. Um, and with
Bitcoin, I'd rather just own assets that
are like Bitcoin related
coin like I've got Coinbase. I've got,
you know, um,
>> see, I actually do own Bitcoin. I've
I've held it for a long time. I I'm
holding it through this crypto winner,
although I did, uh, sell it and reby it
for the, uh, for the tax loss
harvesting. Uh, I am currently sitting
at 12% of my assets in crypto, primarily
Bitcoin. That's a lot, Dave.
>> Of my liquid investable assets.
>> Still, that sounds like a lot. I feel
like that's a lot even for you. It
>> is a lot. It is. I'm I'm more aggressive
than Graham on this. And you are the
least aggressive I've ever heard you
being in it
>> at 1%.
>> It when I become less excited about the
equities in my portfolio, I think I
would be open to having a larger Bitcoin
position. It's just I'm way too
hyped on this kind of we're still early
stage AI. I think the opportunities are
meaningful. I'm I'm leveraged and I just
want my money in other places right now
at least. I I think there's more upside
right now. But I don't know. The Bitcoin
people are gonna want a lot of Bitcoin.
>> How much uh how much are you in uh
CryptoKitties these days,
>> dude? I I've exited, you killed this,
all all of my NFTts are are are have
were sold uh shortly after the NFT
market started to come down. I I I'm net
positive on my NFT journey. The only
ones I kept are the ones that are super
special to me that I won't sell at any
price. Not that it matters anymore
because they're pennies on the dollar,
but but I love them and it was part of
that part of my life. And uh
>> but you haven't sold your Crypto Punk.
>> Well, no. I I h I do have a few crypto
punks and I think I am more likely to
buy more than to sell over the long
term. I think crypto punks will come
back. I know you think I'm nuts. I think
they will come back at some point in
time. It could be 15 or 20 years.
>> I can't tell you how glad I am to not
hear about NFTTS every day.
>> You hated those episodes so much,
Jordan.
>> I hate everything about NFTTS.
>> He He thought we And we were a little
insane. I was a little insane. a little
insane. I was I think I was very
levelheaded on that knowing that
anything I put into an NFT is flushing
money down the toilet, but there's some
fun in owning. I have one Crypto Punk. I
have uh that Logan Paul uh project. I
have I I still have uh the Polaroids
that have NFTTS attached to them. Well,
well, now the new man, all the guys that
were into that are now into uh the
pre-199
Japanese manga magazines. There's like
four that that's where all the appro
Dude, they're up like 700% in six
months. Okay, that's where you want to
put your money buying those manga. Now,
I think Graham's going to get into
you're going to get into this because
some of his stuff is in collectibles.
I'm actually kind of cautious on the
collectible market, but that pre99
Japanese manga that all the influencers
and content creators have been
accumulating, that is interesting. If I
was going to be in a collectible right
now, that's where I'd be putting my
money. Um, because they they just became
great. For those of y'all that don't
know, like the history of comics, right?
comics were kind of like the baseline IP
for all the Marvel movies and all the
cinema that we saw on on on all that
stuff, right? Superman, this that, all
that for 30 or 40 years. Well, now the
new hot thing is Pokemon and One Piece.
Well, the the base IP for how all those
things came to life were basically a few
years, like four or five years of these
Japanese manga uh like magazines or like
really thick magazines and and they were
basically worthless up until, you know,
this last year and people started
collecting them because they were graded
gradable for the first time. So now for
the first time this last year, the big
grading services will actually grade
these mangas the same way they do with
like comic books or Pokemon cards. So
you're seeing a massive lift in the
valuation and attention to Japanese
manga. So yeah, that that's kind of the
insiders alpha on collectibles right now
>> coming from the guy who just sold
Collecticon. That's that's some good
scoop. I might not have any alpha a year
from now, but I I I just sold this thing
a week ago, so I still have some alpha.
I'm still on the inside. Uh that and and
I think dinosaur bone dinosaur bones. A
lot of these guys are I I These guys are
crazy with their dinosaur bones. That's
another thing they're all buying, right?
>> I almost bought a dinosaur bone when I
was on vacation one time.
>> Like a real dinosaur bone.
>> Yeah, like a like a fossil.
>> Shouldn't that be a museum or something?
>> No, you're supposed to. Yeah. I I I
don't I do not own, if anyone's
wondering, I do not own a fossilized
dinosaur. There's not one in my house.
>> I don't think they have to be in the
museum. No, you could you can collect
them.
>> No, you can. And actually, you can if
you if you discover it and you dig it up
yourself, you can absolutely uh keep it.
>> Yeah.
>> This is the age of abundance that we're
talking about.
>> So many pieces, right? Um
>> I want a fully assembled T-Rex in my uh
in my atrium. That's that's what I
really want. It might it might fit
there.
>> You can you you can absolutely
>> like wrap around, but
>> yeah. No, not not at the in my Mexico
house because it has a doublestory large
20 by 20 room that uh I I would really
like to have a T-Rex there.
>> Oh, in the Mexico house.
>> Mhm.
>> Oh, okay.
>> Uh so I don't have any collectibles.
Chris, do you still have any uh Pokemon
cards or any anything that you would
consider collectible?
Yes, I have some stuff. So, because I
was having to do all these all these uh
collect collect shows the last five
years. So, I was traveling the country
basically just a thousand tables trading
Pokemon and all this other stuff. I
decided at one point in time that I was
going to corner
uh the market for uh there's these
Disney cards that came out and I
basically corned the market for Elsas.
So I have like more of these Elsa cards.
We're talking like six figures of Elsa
cards and I'm thinking about kind of
diversifying out of that. I also have
some sports card stuff that I want to
get out of. I'm actually not a big
believer in sports cards. I think that,
you know, they peak and trough based on
the age of the collector who was most
interested in those years of sports. So,
I don't love it as a long-term
investment. I'm just not a even though I
own Collecticon, I'm not a collectibles
guy. Like, I'm just not uh you know what
I like. I like
>> you surprised me all the time with
collecting uh cornering the market on
Elsa cards.
>> I It was
>> I would have never I would have never
guessed that about you.
>> I was bored and I had to spend so much
time at these shows. I just figured I
might as well get into something. And
there is a new Frozen movie coming out
in like 18 uh two years, a year or two.
And I think that will be the perfect
exit window uh for this Elsa collection
that I have built up over the past few
years. So, so we we we'll see. I mean, I
was just doing it for fun on the side,
but I'm getting out of all collectibles
now. Now that I'm out of collect, I'm
I'm getting out of all collectibles. I'm
done.
>> So, Graham Graham says that his uh
percentage of portfolio, it's just a
small hobby for him. collectibles uh are
basically passion assets that that do
have potential ROI like his 2005 Ford GT
is up 65%. Uh but he's very selective uh
analog uh he he's into Disney sells
supercars that sort of thing. Uh but it
is not something that he considers a uh
core to his investment portfolio. Um but
he does enjoy the drive for free
appreciation of his collectible
vehicles. I think he loves them though.
I think the thing is when you
>> He does and his his garage and his his
new space is basically all garage.
>> I listen if if you get enjoyment out of
collectibles and the appreciation if it
happens is just a bonus for you, right?
So I I I get why people love doing that
stuff. It's just it's just not for me.
My collectibles are are are stock
tickers or option tickers.
That's was what I like to call
>> you collect stocks. I collect stocks and
then I trade them out for different
stocks when I when I get bored with one.
>> Boom. And you you could see
>> so much it's so much more intuitive to
me.
>> Yeah. I can't even think about owning
cars. Like I'd rather just own
companies.
>> Yeah.
>> I get no enjoyment out of cars though.
To me, I look at a car and I'm like gh I
got to drive somewhere car.
>> I only enjoy ownership if it fits inside
of my phone. If I can't I don't want
physical
>> I don't want physical anything.
Okay. So, this last category for Graham
and this is uh this is one that I think
is interesting for us to talk about
because of our history with it. Private
equity. Graham says that he is
minimizing and exiting private equity.
It he calls it a big regret. Uh he says
it's illquid. It's a tax hassle. There's
discounts on the on exits. Now, he's
going to avoid anything that is not
tradable within weeks. I've heard some
things that private equity that there's
like a there was a big private equity
boom and that there's going to be a real
problem when these private equity firms
start trying to turn out of all the
different rollups that they've done. Um
I you know I I don't know what they do.
Do they have to try to take them public
now? Do they um you know I think they're
running out of other firms to sell them
to.
To me, that's kind of the biggest risk
of private investing in general. When
there was a market for it and people
were and there like there was new rounds
and there's always an opportunity to
sell. That's one thing. We're not in
that world now, right?
>> And other than somehow going public, all
of these things that are sitting in my
balance sheet of private investments are
basically written down to near nothing.
>> But some of these things seem really
weird to go public. Like there are
private equity firms who specialize in
like dentist offices, right? And so
you're going to send public like a
random collection of family dentist
offices.
>> I feel like those are just cash flow
businesses for the
>> Yeah. You just hold on to them and flow
the cash.
>> Yeah. And hopefully they pay dividends
at some point.
>> Yeah.
>> But at some point you have to return uh
money to to the equity holders in the
private equity fund.
>> Well Well, first of all, when we use the
word private equity, it means so many
different things. I I think the the
private equity that you're referring to,
Jordan, where they're essentially
aggregating dentist offices or vets,
>> I I think that's still probably a great
business. I think it's going to generate
great returns uh for people that are
invested in that type of private equity.
But the private equity has expanded so
much the last 10 or 15 years because
there's been so much money pumped into
the sector that they're getting outside
of their wheelhouse and they're just
starting to throw money into sectors
because they have so much money. And the
problem with any private investment is
that when you're going through a period
of time like we are now with this AI
super cycle, the world is changing
faster than we've ever seen it change.
And if you're invested in a business
that you can't get out of, that business
might lose its relevancy or the e the
the economic conditions that that
business operates under might radically
change due to something like AI. So
there is a big chunk of the private
equity sector that's invested in
businesses not understanding that the
world was going to change so quickly and
a lot of these businesses might get
their valuations destroyed the same way
that we've seen SAS valuations get
destroyed in public equities. The
difference is they can't exit. So if you
don't like being in Salesforce and
you're like this is a risk that we're in
this AI age, you could have just sold
your Salesforce three months ago or six
months ago. But if you have the
equivalent type of holding inside of a
basket of private companies in a private
equity fund, you can't necessarily get
out of that. And that's that's the
issue. It's similar to what we were
saying about real estate. People don't
fully appreciate how amazing liquidity
is in public equities. I've been
preaching this my entire life. The fact
that you can radically change in and out
of all of your portfolio in a
millisecond at any moment in time is so
valuable and people just underappreciate
how valuable that is except during times
like this. because we have a close
friend that was invested in one of what
the largest most prominent uh private uh
real estate uh funds in the state of
Texas, right? So all the big money
historically has been thrown into these
huge real estate funds where they would
own real estate all around the world and
they would develop properties. Well, we
saw what happened to commercial real
estate the last five or six years.
Massive freeze on commercial real estate
for a number of reasons. Part of it due
from work from home, part of it due to
escalating interest rates, uh part of it
due to uh construction cost uh
accelerating beyond what anybody thought
was possible. So, a lot of these funds
that were considered somewhat safe went
belly up. And we have a close friend
that literally lost a 100% of his m of
his money across all of the funds that
he had invested through this massive
institutional real estate, commercial
real estate. uh fund company, right? And
that's just not something that any of
these investors thought was possible and
they couldn't exit. There was no way to
get out.
>> Yeah.
>> Right.
>> Now, okay, there there's a new form of
investing. A question from the chat.
This is uh Nate wants to know what you
think about the Robin Hood Ventures
Index, which is which is a fund
basically. Uh and I bought it and I'm up
20% in it since it launched. Um it is
basically it buys startup companies. uh
preipo like datab bricks, revolt, maror,
airwalls, boom, supersonic, ramp, aura.
>> Wait, do they own actual shares?
>> They own Yeah, they own actual shares or
various uh instruments that represent
shares and you can buy it and sell it.
>> You say various instruments that
represent shares
>> or like SPVS and things. Um
>> yeah. Yeah,
>> they they may not because shares may not
actually exist or they may have a
contractual uh right to buy the shares,
that sort of thing.
>> I think I think it came from a good
place in that Robin Hood and Bahad are
frustrated that
regular investors, right, retail
investors get locked out of latestage
private investments, right, and then
they have to wait until the company IPOs
and they have to buy.
>> I think everybody should be frustrated
by this that Yeah. the public companies
you have access to is a fraction of all
of the cool companies that are out there
right now. Look, if and think about if
Andre were a public company right now,
what it would be doing, right?
>> Of course. But but Jordan,
>> I mean Dave, I would like it better if I
could just invest in individ individual
companies as opposed to the fund. What I
do love about it, I don't know the exact
terms, but I believe there's a 0% carry.
So, he's doing no carry on it, which is
very different from if you want to try
to get into those companies through a
private fund and you're paying a 10 or
20% carry. So,
>> so they have they have a an expense
ratio of 2.13%
until August and then a management fee
uh
>> uh of from 2 to 1%.
>> Annualized,
>> I believe. So, I' I'd have to more into
the details. It It seemed
>> reasonable. It was not like a 2 and 20
>> or 10 and 20.
>> It wasn't just a fee. It's just an
annual fee.
>> Yeah. normally you'll pay that fee plus
a 20% carry. So, at least he's not doing
a carry and and and that and that's
great. The difference I think is that
like I like to know the companies I'm
investing in and and I want to I don't
love investing in just like a blanket
>> a basket. Yeah. Yeah. A basket. Like I
>> you like to be able to pick and choose
your stocks, but these are stocks that
are not stocks that you can't buy
otherwise. And it's an interesting
concept to me to uh to allow individuals
to invest. And like I said, just full
disclosure, I did buy it. Uh and my
buying it has no impact on the price
because it's these priced elements
within it. And yeah.
>> Um yeah, I'm I'm neutral on it. Like I
said, I I want to pick individual stocks
and I want to be able to lever in and
out of them and quickly and all that
stuff. Uh,
>> I wonder if I wonder what the
maintenance rate if I can actually
margin on top of this.
>> That would be interesting.
>> Um,
what else guys? Is that his whole is
that his whole portfolio then?
>> That is his whole portfolio. Um, he
wants to be liquid. He wants to not have
any California real estate overall. He's
wants to be more aggressive on equities
and Bitcoin uh with less cash drag,
simpler liquid portfolio.
uh and he basically just wants fewer
moving parts. He doesn't want to have to
deal with uh returns that that are being
killed by expenses and taxes.
>> Did he mention a triple leverage ETF in
there?
>> He didn't mention that that I that I saw
the one the one that my entire
>> allocation to triple Q.
>> I I keep my entire uh retirement
portfolio in a triple leveraged uh ETF
at all times. whole thing. The whole
thing. I only keep 20% of my retirement
portfolio in that triple leverage ETF.
I listen Dave, we did the research on
it. Like on paper, theoretically,
we shouldn't lose all of our money and
it should theoretically generate 2x
returns even though it's a triple
leverage ETF after fees. Uh it should
generate about 2x returns theoretically
over the long term. uh if we don't have
the biggest crash in history and even
then
there's a chance it can come out and it
would likely recover it and
theoretically give us
>> theoretically because it's already gone
up so much that it would recover. Now I
I misspoke. I'm not 100%. I do have uh
some Robin Hood shares in that as well.
I I'm in I'm primarily in the leveraged
fund, but I do have some Robin Hood
shares that I think were given to me for
moving money to Robin Hood, but
otherwise it's fully in a leveraged ETF
currently in the leveraged uh uh UPRO,
which is uh the S&P 500. Uh I the one
thing I I I wish you know Graham would
do at some point and I wish a lot of
people would do publicly is talk about
having that higher risk higher reward
big money bucket separate account. Yeah.
Where they are investing in options
right and they are investing with
leverage. Maybe you know they're they're
in that triple leverage ETF. they're
maybe they're taking, you know, they're
buying options on high conviction trades
like what I did with Amazon the last few
weeks. Um, if you bucket that money
totally separately and just designate a
different type of money to go into that
bucket knowing that it could
theoretically get wiped out. I think
everyone needs to have that and it's
just frustrating that we we still don't
think that way as retail investors. We
still lump all of our money together and
we're afraid to take these big risks
because guys, what happened with me and
Amazon the last few weeks, as I've been
saying, you get one call right like
that. I I did it last year with Nvidia,
remember? And Robin Hood, you do that
one time in your life. You make one big
call that you're willing to put the
money in super leveraged and you get it
right and you become a top 1% investor
over your entire life just from getting
that one call right. That's how big of a
difference maker it has. and and it
could be years before you get that
confident around a particular company
and a time frame, but you want to have
money bucketed for that moment in time
so that you can go all in because like
you guys know what I did on Amazon. It
was insane.
>> It was insane.
And
>> your timing on that was uh just
miraculous and not because you knew
anything or had any you just you were
just had a very strong conviction that
Amazon should go up because of where we
are in the AI cycle and you just went
all in
>> guys when when the market hit its bottom
and it was the most like the worst of
the worst weeks. I don't remember was it
a few weeks ago, a couple weeks ago, uh
my account was down like 40% and I went
all in on Amazon options. My Amazon
options I think were up to as much as
40% of my entire full portfolio where
Amazon. So I was prepared to lose
another 40% of my liquid net worth.
>> But you had this check coming in from
Collecticon. You you you took risk. You
took risk when you had a very high
likelihood of having a a replenishment
event for any losses.
>> But even then, it would have been like
half of that check if I huge massive
amount of money.
>> Okay. So, tell us where where you think
Amazon goes from here.
>> We're going to talk individual stocks.
The the chat has been blowing up saying
you guys are stop talking about
collectibles. Tell me about stocks. So,
let's let's go Amazon. Where does Amazon
go from here?
>> I I still love it. I love it just as
much as I loved it at $198.
Uh where I kind of went all in. I went
all in more at like two some 205 and
then more at 215. It's at what 260 now.
258. I don't know.
>> I don't care to 300.
>> I don't even care.
>> Susa wants to know.
>> I'm all in. I'm all in. I'm not
>> 26343.
>> What I do, guys, is I continue to roll
up my options. So I basically take we've
talked about this in the past,
>> but you're not you're not still that
deep like 40% of your portfolio in
Amazon options. You've
>> No, because back
>> what I'm doing is I'm rolling my options
up. So I'm I'm selling my options. I'm
taking the profits and then I'm taking
some portion of those profits to
purchase new options at a higher strike
price obviously because Amazon keeps
going up. So I've essentially
>> taken the gains. Those are my gains. I'm
not losing them. I'm taking a part of
the profits to reup in new Amazon
options.
>> What would you just ballpark your
current Amazon option percentage out of
your total portfolio?
>> Uh I would say 5% right now today.
>> All right. That that may I I'll be able
to sleep better at night knowing it's
only 5% and not 40%.
>> Uh but I could get excited tomorrow and
it could go up to 10 or 15%.
>> I know that's that's what worries me.
All right. What are your What are your
thoughts on uh Robin Hood near-term?
>> Love it. Love it. Love it. Oh. Oh. Oh.
Near-term. I don't have any like super
strong thoughts on it like this week or
next week. Love it long term. I love
being able to buy it down here. I went
deeper into Robin Hood at 70.
>> Uh I think I just picked up some more
calls this morning. So like I just want
to be heavier Robin Hood, but not for
the week or for the month. This is like
I don't I don't know when Robin Hood's
going to pop again. It could be six
months from now. I don't care. I want to
have a bigger position in Robin Hood
long term.
>> You're in long. You're in for the long
term on Robin Hood. I'm in Robin Hood
for the long term.
>> Let's talk about AMD.
Michael Levescu. I'm I can't read these
names. It's too small.
>> Um, yeah, I have AMD. It's part of my AI
sector trade. I have a handful of
companies like Micron, AMD. I don't I
think I accidentally sold my Intel. It
makes me sick because I like I was
running out of money and I needed money
because my margin was capping out on
that Amazon trade. So, I was forced
>> like what is what is the what is the
dirtiest name in my portfolio? Intel.
>> Yeah. Well, it's just like
>> and then it just rocketed.
>> I had to I had to pick something and I
picked Intel to sell and of course
Intel's flying. Uh I have AMD, listen,
great. Like it's part of my sector, my
AI super trade, but it's not the one I'm
going heaviest in on. Uh, Micron. I I
love I love all of the uh memory
companies. Did you guys have you did you
see uh uh
>> SanDisk keeps just going crazy?
>> Uh Raku, the Japanese company we did a
show on. Dude, it's almost doubled. It's
crazy, dude. This is the imaging company
in Japan that basically uh is a healthc
care company, but they have imaging
equipment that they're repurposing to to
check the circuitry in AI chips before
they head to the data center. They're
one of like two companies in the world
that does this. Uh this the we did a
whole episode on this I don't know a
month or two ago and since we did that
episode the stock is up like 70%. Um
astonishing. Unfortunately, I couldn't
get leverage on that. uh because it's in
a global account, you have to transfer
into yen. There's no options. You can't
do margin.
But I I'm astonished. Uh Gian Shu Dong,
who is our close friend who tipped us
off on that trade, he did this like I
don't know 60page report on Reaku. He
really nailed it. Gianu nailed it again.
He's been on fire. He's the He's our
Bloom Energy guy, too. So, speaking of
Bloom Energy, too,
>> uh, see Bloom,
>> it exploded off of that um,
>> listen,
>> off of that uh, expanded contract with
Oracle.
>> This is what we've been saying.
>> It's it's up 55% in the past month.
>> But this is what we've been saying.
Bloom Energy is in negotiations with
every hyperscaler. So, like, when are
they going to when's the Meta
announcement? When's the Amazon
announcement? when is the Google
announcement? Like the they're what
they're bringing to market simply has to
be fully proven. Um, but they are still
>> and with each announcement it gets a
little bit more proven and easier for
the next company to actually take them
seriously because I think that that
their biggest problem was kind of people
not believing their tech and now Oracle
and then the stock booms up and if we
get another announcement I I just expect
that that chart should go up with a jolt
every time there's a new announcement
and if not I don't know what I don't
know what we're doing. The the issue
with Bloom is it's a super volatile
stock, right? So any bad news, any even
P, By the way, Bloom went down to what
$75 a share on quote bad news that we
knew was BS. That's why we doubled down
on Bloom. But
>> but it doesn't matter if it's BS. If
there's some rumor or some
misinterpretation of the market or
Bloom, people will take that stock down
so violently, it could drop by 40% in a
millisecond. So, if you're invested in
Bloom, you need to be ready for that
type of volatility. But wow, has Bloom
performed for us, man. That has just
been one hell of a call this year.
Uh, what else people want to know about?
Troy Baker wants to know if there's
anything new with Sphere, which is
another one that uh in the past month is
up 13%.
Uh up 430%
in one year. You were in this heavy for
uh the Wizard of Oz trade. Are you still
in it?
>> I
>> Anything new? And now I think I'm
pulling my account up because sometimes
I don't even know. But I believe I am
fully out of sphere.
>> I'm fully out too and kind of regretting
it.
>> Well, you know, like I said, here's the
deal, guys. It was a social arbit trade
and we entered sphere when there was a
massive information imbalance in the
company and we exited it when the rest
of the world
learned about what we already knew.
Okay. So since then the company has gone
up like 400%. And that's what being a
social investor is all about. Does it
mean that Sphere can't continue to grow
from here? Absolutely not. Um the
company could but but that's a different
trade. So I need to now understand what
new information do I understand about
sphere that the market hasn't
appreciated or is unaware of for me to
get back into sphere because I'm not
buying sphere as a fundamental you know
investor or as a technical investor. I
only buy and sell things as a social orb
investor. So that's why I'm out of
sphere. My thesis is now well known and
the stock price same listen bloom I
still think bloom is really
misunderstood by a big chunk of the
market. I think bloom if they continue
to execute if uh I think there's a lot
more upside to bloom if the company
executes because I do think they will be
a primary beneficiary of the power trade
for the AI super cycle. So, I don't want
to sell sell my bloom yet.
>> Let's talk about a stock. We talked
about our winners. We always also
address our losers. Let's talk about
TAC, Trans Alta.
>> Uh it currently uh three-month chart on
that it's down two and a almost 3%. One
month it's down 5%.
One year still up 44%. But we were not
in it for that for that rise.
>> But it's up 3% today.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Well,
>> Transalta, uh, they got killed by a
couple things. One, the we were
investing in Transalta because of the
inevitable move of data centers to
Alberta and Trans Alta would be a
primary beneficiary as one of the few
companies that has excess power in
Alberta to partner with data centers.
Right? Then they hit a major delay with
uh their data center deal. The
administration here in the US from my
intel is pressuring all the hyperscalers
not to move into Canada. They want them
here. So that could present additional
delays going into Alberta. Three, they
had an exceptionally warm uh winter in
Alberta which kind of hurt their energy
situation there in terms of pricing. So,
it was kind of like the perfect storm of
bad news. I'm not selling because I
still believe I I think I have exited
part of my position because I needed to
exit partially out of a lot of positions
when my account got destroyed last
month. But I feel that it is an
inevitability uh that data centers will
get into Canada and Alberta
specifically. So, I'm holding the
majority of my position in Trans Alta.
It kind of sucks that we're not
participating in this market move right
now, but I'm not selling for now. I I I
think I I don't know how long it will be
with this administration before they
loosen up some of that rhetoric on
having to build just here in the US, but
I think it's an inevitability. So, it
could be two months from now or or 18
months from now before that story
finally gets to play out.
>> I'm hanging on to it. And uh as a as
just a tracker for knowing uh where this
is since we first talked about it, it is
down 14%.
Because that's what I'm down in. And I
>> People were asking about healthcare
stocks. Um I don't buy healthc care
stocks when tech stocks are exploding.
For me, healthcare is like a recession
stock because people overspend on health
care during recession.
>> So, I bought a healthcare stock. Jordan,
>> you did?
>> Yes, I did.
>> Which one?
>> So, it's a it's a s You know how
everyone's talking about this SAS
apocalypse, right? All these SAS
companies are getting destroyed.
>> Eliminated. I was trying to figure out
which of these SAS companies that got
destroyed, if any, do I actually like
long term that I that I think is
relatively protected from AI. And the
company I settled on was Viva Systems,
Vev.
um they are I mean you could research
them but they are basically in the
healthc care world and I think because
they sit in that world I think there's
simply more hurdles more regulation the
moat is larger I think the degree of
safety and trust that's involved in
anything that touches that sector is
going to make it more difficult for pure
artificial intelligence frontier model
companies to come in and disrupt the
space. So they got beaten down along
with all the other SAS companies and I
like them. So I I opened up I mean pull
the chart you could see look at that.
Wow. They literally got basically cut in
half by 50%. I took a position in the
last couple weeks. So we'll see it's a
long they're basically a cloud uh cloud
provider for the health sc life life
sciences industry.
>> Yeah. You see I don't really view that
as like a healthcare stock. When I think
healthcare stocks I'm thinking you know
like uh you know any of the any of like
UNH or uh you know
>> okay I I'm talking more
>> hospital stocks um HCA those types of
stocks. But we believe that the entire
sector is going to massively grow over
the next couple decades because of the
aging uh population. Right, Jordan? So,
>> I'm not saying that I don't like
healthcare stocks. I'm just not buying
any right now when tech stocks are going
insane. Whenever they roll over,
whenever tech stocks, you know, have
their next freak out and we're all
recession doom and gloom, then I might
buy some healthcare. But that's why I
like Viva Systems because they they they
got cut by 50%. Right? They got cut by
50%. They are a technology company that
I think long-term actually has some huge
tailwinds as more money gets pumped into
the entirety of the health care sector
with the aging population. So I I think
with with reg the regulatory environment
it gets really tricky Jordan when you're
talking about United Healthcare and all
these other you know insurance
companies. What is the government going
to mandate? I I have no clue. But I'd
rather be in a technology company there
that that's going to benefit from the
expansion of that sector that's somewhat
I think protected
>> from the regulatory environment. And
that same regulatory environment
actually might protect them a bit from
pure AI type companies that aren't fully
proven out touching patient data, you
know.
>> Yeah, I think that's good.
>> So related to healthcare and probably
the topic for an entire episode on its
own, but how do we invest in the peptide
trend? Josh wants to know.
>> Check back with us next week when we do
our peptide episode of Dumb Money. That
is going to be a good one, guys. This
peptide trend is no longer a trend. It's
officially a super cycle just like AI.
This is going to be one of the biggest
movements I think of the decade. Uh it's
unstoppable. It started just with kind
of rich guys talking about peptides from
their doctor kind of getting doing stuff
that no one else even knew about. And
now it's starting to scale out and
become democratized to where
>> it's gone ex mainstream and it will be
the thing that is on the Today show in
two months. And so we we definitely want
to get in early.
>> Guys, let me tell you this is no joke.
The the peptide trade is real. Uh we're
going to dive really deep into the
peptide peptide trade next week. We are
in the earliest stages of uh the
commercialization of peptides. I I look
at this moment in a similar way to when
I was talking about GLP1s back before
anybody was talking about GLP ones.
Remember Dave? When we were at the OMIC
trade, people thought we were insane.
I think like 35% of my portfolio back
then was in Eli Liy. Um and
>> yeah, you you were early on Eli Liy. Um
I was later that was that was good.
>> Jordan, I see
>> Novo Nordisk.
No, Novo. Actually, I'll take it back. I
was in Novo before really.
>> Novo was first. I own some Novo right
now.
>> I'm kind of mostly out of that stuff.
Yeah. Again, because the market, not
that it's bad, but the market now fully
understands everything that I understood
about the GLP1 movement back in the day
and how large it was going to get.
>> Um, I think peptides, guys, are
potentially that big. This is such a
massive storyline. We just got to figure
out the trades and
>> let's be mindful of time. We're we're at
an hour and nine and I know that uh we
>> got because I am stumping for
schoolboard elections.
>> Wait, what does that mean?
>> I don't know what that means.
>> Are you gonna be on a
>> So, I'm like out at the at the polling
sites talking to voters.
>> Oh, boy. Yeah.
>> Local politics. Very political.
Love it, man. Love it. Everyone should
get involved in local politics. That's
where people's time should be spent
trying to make a difference, I think.
>> Um, all right. Well, let's hope Amazon
keeps moving here, guys. Amazon earnings
next week. We might need
>> That's right. Oh, we we should probably
do an Amazon episode in addition to a
peptide episode if we, you know, we're
not going to be able to pull that off.
We We can do like one episode a month. I
I love the peptide episode research
because I'm I'm researching it for the
trade, but I'm researching it for
myself. I I I need to get some of my
hair back, man. I I need I I
>> I might be taking peptides, man. They
are the uh it's it's the supplement that
actually works. I
>> I was with a guy yesterday. He was on
this reality show thing with me and this
guy was 57 years old and I swear he
looked 37 tops. I said, "Tell me right
now everything that you're on right
now." And I I have a list I have a list
of the pep diets he's on.
>> Send me the list.
>> I will, man. Cuz like it's
>> You just send you to Brian Johnson's
website.
>> No, this guy was legit. Legit. I could
not believe like I I would do anything
to look like this guy looked. Um so
yeah, this is this will be a fun one. We
do our peptide episode.
>> All right, look for that next week here
on Dumb Money. Everybody have yourself a
great weekend. Oh, little uh view of
which island are you on there in Hawaii?
>> Uh I am on the northshore of Hawaii
leaving imminently. So like this is my
last couple of hours here. I've been
here all week. Uh, I'm I will be home
within hours. So
>> So we we'll see it was we'll see you
soon and we'll see everybody else next
week here on Dumb Money.
>> Thanks.
>> And I have to hit the button twice.
Get the TLDR of any YouTube video
Transcribe, summarize, and repurpose videos in 125+ languages — free, no signup required.